upper waypoint

As the Pandemic Wanes, Newsom's Emergency Powers Remain in Place

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Gov. Gavin Newsom on March 10, 2021, while visiting a mobile COVID-19 vaccination center in South Gate, California. (Mario Tama/Getty Images)

There have been vanishingly few upsides to the COVID-19 pandemic, but take-out cocktails might be one of them. Last week in San Francisco, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced his decision to allow restaurants to keep offering cocktails to-go and be able to maintain expanded outdoor seating through the end of the year.

“To allow these businesses to expand their footprint and expand their opportunity to recover from this pandemic," Newsom said. "And, moreover, to create new business opportunities in the future.”

The move is just one of dozens Newsom has taken on his own, without legislative approval, since the beginning of the pandemic.

The governor declared a state of emergency in California on March 4, 2020, which gave him wide latitude to act alone on issues he believed would help protect the state and its residents during the crisis. For instance, Newsom implemented a statewide stay-at-home order, urged cities to halt the eviction of renters affected by COVID-19 and spent hundreds of millions of dollars with limited legislative oversight. Newsom has issued 58 executive orders to alter or suspend hundreds of laws because of the virus.

Loyola Law School professor Jessica Levinson said Newsom was appropriately aggressive as the virus spread.


“You can't say when we have exponential growth in a pandemic, I think we should all convene and talk about it and go through the committee process and vote," she said.

But the state will reopen on June 15. Capacity restrictions, physical distancing and mask mandates for the fully vaccinated will largely be lifted. Levinson said it may be time for Newsom’s emergency powers to be lifted along with them.

“The whole idea behind separation of powers is we don't trust anyone that much, that we don't want to give the so-called sovereign, the governor, too much power because they'll just keep taking and taking and taking," Levinson said. "Are we there? No. But are we at the place where we have to say if we can resume life as normal, then we can resume our government as normal? Yes.”

Republicans in California have long thought Newsom should give up his emergency powers. Gubernatorial candidates Kevin Faulconer and John Cox, both hoping to replace Newsom in the upcoming recall election, each criticized him for keeping the state of emergency in place. State Sen. Melissa Melendez, R-Lake Elsinore, told San Diego television station KUSI last February that while some safety protocols should remain, it was time for the state of emergency to end. She introduced legislation at the end of 2020 to do just that.

“Take away this kind of one-man rule over the state and allow counties to determine what is best for their county," Melendez said, "whether that is opening schools or opening businesses.”

Melendez’s measure quickly stalled in the Democratic-controlled Senate. Newsom has largely beaten any legal challenges to his authority, with the exception of limits placed on indoor religious services. And legislative Democrats have not been in any hurry to reclaim their power. Assembly Speaker Anthony Rendon, D-Lakewood, told KQED he thinks things will soon go back to normal.

“When the state reopens on June 15, we anticipate that a lot of that stuff will recede. We, the Assembly and the Legislature more generally, obviously, we think we have a role in governance. And, yeah, if the emergency goes away, it's time for the emergency powers to go away.”

However, there’s currently no vote scheduled in either the Assembly or the Senate to end the state of emergency.

Newsom could end it himself. In fact, the law requires him to “at the earliest possible date that conditions warrant.” However, at a news conference last week, Newsom said variants of the virus are still spreading that, combined with varying vaccination rates in other states and countries, could require him to issue new restrictions in the future. His office further asserts the state of emergency gives the state access to federal money needed to continue critical COVID-related services, like vaccinations, testing and contact tracing.

So for now, at least, he will keep the state of emergency in place past June 15. And that means his emergency powers will stay in place, too.

Reporting from the Associated Press was used in this report.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Carnaval San Francisco 2024: From the Parade Route to Parking, Here's What to Know‘My Octopus Teacher’ Filmmaker on Connecting to Our Wild SelvesPollster Sounding the Alarm About RFK Jr.'s Presidential CampaignAll You Can Eat: Yes, the Bay Area Does Have a Late Night Dining SceneKQED Cuts 34 Positions Amid Budget ShortfallState Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Prop. 22 … and the Gig EconomyUC Academic Workers’ Strike is Limited to Santa Cruz So Far. Here’s WhyCOVID Is Rising in Bay Area Wastewater Again. Why?Ever Seen A Koi Fish on the Sidewalk? Artist Explains Hidden MeaningPolice Respond to New UCLA Protest Camp as Academic Workers Expand Strike