window.__IS_SSR__=true
window.__INITIAL_STATE__={
"attachmentsReducer": {
"audio_0": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_0",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background0.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_1": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_1",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background1.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_2": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_2",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background2.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_3": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_3",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background3.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_4": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_4",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background4.jpg"
}
}
},
"placeholder": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "placeholder",
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-160x107.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 107,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"medium": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-800x533.jpg",
"width": 800,
"height": 533,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"medium_large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-768x512.jpg",
"width": 768,
"height": 512,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1536x1024.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 1024,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-lrg": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1536x1024.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 1024,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-med": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-sm": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-800x533.jpg",
"width": 800,
"height": 533,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1038x576.jpg",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xxsmall": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-160x107.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 107,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xsmall": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"small": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xlarge": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1920x1280.jpg",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1280,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-32": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 32,
"height": 32,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-50": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 50,
"height": 50,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-64": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 64,
"height": 64,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-96": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 96,
"height": 96,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-128": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 128,
"height": 128,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"detail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 160,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1333
}
}
}
},
"audioPlayerReducer": {
"postId": "stream_live",
"isPaused": true,
"isPlaying": false,
"pfsActive": false,
"pledgeModalIsOpen": true,
"playerDrawerIsOpen": false,
"liveAudioPlayStartedAt": 0,
"liveAudioPlayContext": ""
},
"authorsReducer": {
"jbrooks": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "80",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "80",
"found": true
},
"name": "Jon Brooks",
"firstName": "Jon",
"lastName": "Brooks",
"slug": "jbrooks",
"email": "jbrooks@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": true,
"staff_mastheads": [
"science"
],
"title": "Digital Editor",
"bio": "Jon Brooks is a former Digital Editor for KQED Science. He is the former editor of KQED’s daily news blog, News Fix. In 2014, he won a California Journalism Award for his coverage of ride services like Uber and Lyft and the taxi industry. A veteran blogger, he previously worked for Yahoo! in various news writing and editing roles. Jon is also a playwright whose work has been produced in San Francisco, New York, Italy, and around the U.S. He has written about film for his own blog and studied film at Boston University.",
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98887f7ed1c876ed414d4c915e969584?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": "jbrooksfoy",
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "arts",
"roles": [
"Contributor",
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"author"
]
},
{
"site": "futureofyou",
"roles": [
"administrator"
]
},
{
"site": "mindshift",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "stateofhealth",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "science",
"roles": [
"administrator"
]
},
{
"site": "quest",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Jon Brooks | KQED",
"description": "Digital Editor",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98887f7ed1c876ed414d4c915e969584?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98887f7ed1c876ed414d4c915e969584?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/jbrooks"
},
"matthewgreen": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "1263",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "1263",
"found": true
},
"name": "Matthew Green",
"firstName": "Matthew",
"lastName": "Green",
"slug": "matthewgreen",
"email": "mgreen@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": "KQED Editor/Reporter",
"bio": "Matthew Green is a digital media producer for KQED News. He previously produced \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/lowdown\">The Lowdown\u003c/a>, KQED’s multimedia news education blog. Matthew's written for numerous Bay Area publications, including the Oakland Tribune and San Francisco Chronicle. He also taught journalism classes at Fremont High School in East Oakland.\r\n\r\nEmail: mgreen@kqed.org; Twitter: @MGreenKQED",
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3bf498d1267ca02c8494f33d8cfc575e?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": "MGreenKQED",
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "news",
"roles": []
},
{
"site": "lowdown",
"roles": []
},
{
"site": "science",
"roles": []
},
{
"site": "education",
"roles": []
},
{
"site": "quest",
"roles": []
},
{
"site": "liveblog",
"roles": []
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Matthew Green | KQED",
"description": "KQED Editor/Reporter",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3bf498d1267ca02c8494f33d8cfc575e?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3bf498d1267ca02c8494f33d8cfc575e?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/matthewgreen"
}
},
"pagesReducer": {
"news_tag_politics": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_17968",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "17968",
"score": 8.003446
},
"name": "Politics",
"slug": "politics",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Politics | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 18002,
"isLoading": false,
"title": "Politics",
"pageMeta": {
"site": "news",
"WpPageTemplate": "page-topic-editorial",
"currentPage": 271
},
"blocks": [
{
"blockName": "kqed/post-list",
"attrs": {
"layout": "cardArticle2",
"query": "posts/news?tag=politics",
"seeMore": false,
"paginated": true,
"page": 271
}
},
{
"blockName": "kqed/ad"
}
]
}
},
"pfsSessionReducer": {},
"postsReducer": {
"stream_live": {
"type": "live",
"id": "stream_live",
"audioUrl": "https://streams.kqed.org/kqedradio",
"title": "Live Stream",
"excerpt": "Live Stream information currently unavailable.",
"link": "/radio",
"featImg": "",
"label": {
"name": "KQED Live",
"link": "/"
}
},
"stream_kqedNewscast": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "stream_kqedNewscast",
"audioUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/.stream/anon/radio/RDnews/newscast.mp3?_=1",
"title": "KQED Newscast",
"featImg": "",
"label": {
"name": "88.5 FM",
"link": "/"
}
},
"news_49051": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_49051",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "49051",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1323200746000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "the-daily-show-direct-democracy",
"title": "Video: The Daily Show on California's Direct Democracy",
"publishDate": 1323200746,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Video: The Daily Show on California’s Direct Democracy | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>The Daily Show really needs to start paying royalties to California politicians. Last night, it was current Democratic Party Chairman and Official State Potty Mouth John Burton, along with GOP Assemblyman and former Minuteman Tim Donnelly, who served as props in the burgeoning cottage industry of making fun of our government.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In this bit, John Oliver, \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2010/12/31/the-daily-shows-john-oliver-visits-kqed/\">who had some funny things to say to us last year\u003c/a> about the gubernatorial election, makes sport of California’s system of direct democracy, focusing on this year’s brouhaha over the Amazon sales tax (which now \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/23/governor-signs-amazon-compromise-bill-no-online-sales-tax-for-at-least-a-year/\">seems to have been settled\u003c/a>, though the piece doesn’t mention that). \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“What if I were to suggest an initiative that May 31 should forever be referred to as Tim Donelly is an a***** day,” Oliver asks Donnelly. “I mean, I’d need 500,000 signatures.” \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“I don’t think that would be that hard in this state,” a fully-prepared-for-mockery Donnelly retorts. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“I think that’s probably true,” says Oliver, fully prepared for someone fully prepared. Edit, joke on Donnelly.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"background-color:#000000;width:520px\">\n\u003cdiv style=\"padding:4px\">\u003cembed src=\"http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:403607\" width=\"512\" height=\"288\" type=\"application/x-shockwave-flash\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" base=\".\" flashvars=\"\">\u003c/embed>\n\u003cp style=\"text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px\">\u003cb>\u003ca href=\"http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-december-5-2011/california-s-direct-democracy-troubles\">The Daily Show\u003c/a>\u003c/b>\u003cbr>Get More: \u003ca href=\"http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/\">Daily Show Full Episodes\u003c/a>,\u003ca href=\"http://www.indecisionforever.com/\">Political Humor & Satire Blog\u003c/a>,\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow\">The Daily Show on Facebook\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\n\u003c/div>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Burton and Donnelly now join San Francisco Supervisor \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/01/04/the-daily-show-san-francisco-happy-meal-toy-ban/\">Eric Mar\u003c/a> and former Mayor Gavin Newsom; and East Bay Congressman \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/06/10/video-john-garamendi-on-stephen-colbert/\">John Garamendi\u003c/a> as California politicos-turned-comedic fodder on The Daily Show-Colbert circuit. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Sort of reminds me of the \u003ca href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Generals\">Washington Generals\u003c/a>, the born-to-lose basketball team created for the sole purpose of playing the Harlem Globetrotters. The Generals racked up a 2,495-game losing streak, gamely and earnestly taking jumpshots and collecting rebounds while the main attraction clowned up a storm around them…\u003c/p>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721146992,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 11,
"wordCount": 296
},
"headData": {
"title": "Video: The Daily Show on California's Direct Democracy | KQED",
"description": "The Daily Show really needs to start paying royalties to California politicians. Last night, it was current Democratic Party Chairman and Official State Potty Mouth John Burton, along with GOP Assemblyman and former Minuteman Tim Donnelly, who served as props in the burgeoning cottage industry of making fun of our government. In this bit, John",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Video: The Daily Show on California's Direct Democracy",
"datePublished": "2011-12-06T11:45:46-08:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-16T09:23:12-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/49051/the-daily-show-direct-democracy",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>The Daily Show really needs to start paying royalties to California politicians. Last night, it was current Democratic Party Chairman and Official State Potty Mouth John Burton, along with GOP Assemblyman and former Minuteman Tim Donnelly, who served as props in the burgeoning cottage industry of making fun of our government.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In this bit, John Oliver, \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2010/12/31/the-daily-shows-john-oliver-visits-kqed/\">who had some funny things to say to us last year\u003c/a> about the gubernatorial election, makes sport of California’s system of direct democracy, focusing on this year’s brouhaha over the Amazon sales tax (which now \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/23/governor-signs-amazon-compromise-bill-no-online-sales-tax-for-at-least-a-year/\">seems to have been settled\u003c/a>, though the piece doesn’t mention that). \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“What if I were to suggest an initiative that May 31 should forever be referred to as Tim Donelly is an a***** day,” Oliver asks Donnelly. “I mean, I’d need 500,000 signatures.” \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“I don’t think that would be that hard in this state,” a fully-prepared-for-mockery Donnelly retorts. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“I think that’s probably true,” says Oliver, fully prepared for someone fully prepared. Edit, joke on Donnelly.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"background-color:#000000;width:520px\">\n\u003cdiv style=\"padding:4px\">\u003cembed src=\"http://media.mtvnservices.com/mgid:cms:item:comedycentral.com:403607\" width=\"512\" height=\"288\" type=\"application/x-shockwave-flash\" allowfullscreen=\"true\" allowscriptaccess=\"always\" base=\".\" flashvars=\"\">\u003c/embed>\n\u003cp style=\"text-align:left;background-color:#FFFFFF;padding:4px;margin-top:4px;margin-bottom:0px;font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px\">\u003cb>\u003ca href=\"http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/mon-december-5-2011/california-s-direct-democracy-troubles\">The Daily Show\u003c/a>\u003c/b>\u003cbr>Get More: \u003ca href=\"http://www.thedailyshow.com/full-episodes/\">Daily Show Full Episodes\u003c/a>,\u003ca href=\"http://www.indecisionforever.com/\">Political Humor & Satire Blog\u003c/a>,\u003ca href=\"http://www.facebook.com/thedailyshow\">The Daily Show on Facebook\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\n\u003c/div>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Burton and Donnelly now join San Francisco Supervisor \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/01/04/the-daily-show-san-francisco-happy-meal-toy-ban/\">Eric Mar\u003c/a> and former Mayor Gavin Newsom; and East Bay Congressman \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/06/10/video-john-garamendi-on-stephen-colbert/\">John Garamendi\u003c/a> as California politicos-turned-comedic fodder on The Daily Show-Colbert circuit. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Sort of reminds me of the \u003ca href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Generals\">Washington Generals\u003c/a>, the born-to-lose basketball team created for the sole purpose of playing the Harlem Globetrotters. The Generals racked up a 2,495-game losing streak, gamely and earnestly taking jumpshots and collecting rebounds while the main attraction clowned up a storm around them…\u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/49051/the-daily-show-direct-democracy",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_223"
],
"tags": [
"news_1612",
"news_17968",
"news_71",
"news_423",
"news_1170"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_47400": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_47400",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "47400",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1321565453000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "interview-jean-quan-on-failure-of-measure-i-occupy-oakland-snow-park-and-oakland-the-city",
"title": "Interview: Jean Quan on Failure of Measure I, Occupy Oakland, Snow Park, and Oakland the City",
"publishDate": 1321565453,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Interview: Jean Quan on Failure of Measure I, Occupy Oakland, Snow Park, and Oakland the City | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>Oakland Mayor Jean Quan has not had an auspicious five weeks, even her diminishing contingent of supporters would agree. In fact, cataloguing her recent woes is no small task: \u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19089606\">Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts resigns\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/10/25/police-arrest-protesters-tear-down-occupy-oakland-tent-city/\">Police and Occupy Demonstrators Clash in Oakland\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-10-27/news/30331150_1_police-raid-oakland-mayor-jean-quan-police-officers\">Occupy Oakland: Jean Quan ‘I don’t know everything’\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/10/mayor_jean_quan_apologizes_to.php\">Mayor Jean Quan Apologizes to Occupy Oakland, Gets Booed Off Stage\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CC4QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibtimes.com%2Farticles%2F242783%2F20111103%2Foakland-mayor-criticized-police-officers-response-occupy.htm&ei=sHPFTo2eEISWiQKbivHgBQ&usg=AFQjCNEkjhNrimRQZFhDpjk5YOEboaOgyQ&sig2=RkrX1Yt76jEX-iSE1JbSlg\">Oakland Mayor criticized by Police Officers for Her Response to Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19184212\">Quan opponents file for her recall, hoping to turn 71 signatures into 20,000\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/mayor-jean-quans-oakland-dream-turned-nightmare/2011/10/28/gIQAfQBJPM_blog.html\">Mayor Jean Quan’s ‘Oakland dream turned nightmare’\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/video/6454230-quan-approval-rating-stays-low-despite-2nd-occupy-raid/\">CBS 5 Poll: Oaklanders Unhappy With Mayor Quan, Handling Of Protests\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/250038/20111115/occupy-oakland-deputy-mayor-quits-hours-quan.htm/\">Deputy Mayor Quits Hours After Quan’s Senior Legal Adviser\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_19344174\">Oakland Mayor Jean Quan loses her choice for port commission\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/video/6454230-quan-approval-rating-stays-low-despite-2nd-occupy-raid/\">Quan Approval Rating Stays Low Despite 2nd Occupy Raid\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.eastbayexpress.com/92510/archives/2011/04/06/wednesday-must-read-quans-parcel-tax-voted-down-abc-security-loses-city-contract\">Quan’s parcel tax voted down\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47613\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/jeanquanSM.jpg\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/jeanquanSM.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"jeanquanSM\" width=\"300\" height=\"198\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47613\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>I actually could go on, but you get the picture…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Journalist \u003ca href=\"http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201111041630/a\">Josh Richman recently told KQED’s Scott Shafer\u003c/a> that he didn’t know if there’s anything Quan can do to recover. Still, Quan is only one year into a four-year term. Crisis communications consultant Chris Lehane — who knows from political low points (think Monica Lewinsky. He helped manage that scandal in the Clinton White House) — \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/07/interview-political-consultant-chris-lehane-on-how-big-city-mayors-should-handle-occupy-wall-street-protests/\">told Scott Shafer last week\u003c/a> that Quan can still come back from the Occupy Oakland crisis.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“I think ultimately people in these positions will be evaluated over the long term,” Lehane said. “She’s apologized, which is important, particularly for politicians, who almost never apologize. This situation is so big, there’s going to be little she can do in the day to day. Politicians have to realize you’re not going to immediately come back, they have to have a long-term strategy.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“Given her history, that she came up through community activism, she’s someone who can step up with an interesting policy or program and seize the moment in a positive way.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Yesterday, KQED’s Joshua Johnson interviewed Quan fresh off her defeat on Measure I, a $60 million parcel tax that would have been used for a range of services related to public safety, city services, and infrastructure needs. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>One thing in particular I found interesting about the mayor’s answers, as well as those she gave in a recent \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/09/mayor-quan-on-all-things-considered-weve-got-the-extended-interview/\">national interview with NPR\u003c/a>, is how sympathetic she appears to be to the Occupy movement’s goals and even its internal processes, going so far in the NPR segment as to explain in detail the reasoning behind the Occupy Oakland general assembly’s refusal to let her address the encampment. To which All Things Considered correspondent Martin Kaste said, almost incredulously, “but you’re the mayor!” \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here is Joshua Johnson’s interview. A transcript follows the audio. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/quanjohnson.mp3\">\u003cstrong>Audio: Jean Quan on Failure of Measure I, Occupy Oakland, and the City’s Economy\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/quanjohnson.mp3|titles=quanjohnson]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What are your thoughts on the outcome of the Measure I election? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s not surprising. Even the San Francisco tax measures went down. In Oakland we’ve been a little distracted so the people who normally would have been out there campaigning for this didn’t have much time to work for it. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But it means we will not be able to restore some of the services we cut. At the beginning of the year I put out several options, including an all-cuts budget. Luckily the employees of the city gave back 10 %., undertaking for the first time major pension reform relief in the city. Even the police are now paying into their pension. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We could have restored some of the cuts, some full-time senior programs, some road and tree people, some park maintenance people, to add and upgrade our technology at the libraries, which needs constant funding to keep the internet and other services going. And probably most importantly for Oaklanders, it was going to allow us the extra money for police recruitment and training. The baby boomers are retiring and the replacement of police officers are probably the most expensive cost. It costs us about 100k to train and recruit new police officers. With boomers retiring at a higher rate, we really don’t necessarily have enough money right now to keep up with that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>My biggest hope is that the economy in Oakland swings up a bit. We’re hoping to make a couple of good announcements on new projects in Oakland and eventually we’ll be able to cover that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>It seems like all of this has been something of a double whammy. You’ve got the Occupy protesters which scared off some business….\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Yes, we had this perfect storm. I think it would have been hard to pass Measure I anyway. But we thought we had to try to give Oaklanders a chance to try to step up. It would have been a quarter a day. Otherwise what we have now is an all-cuts budget. We have the potential loss of a couple of businesses downtown. And a lot of small businesses are really hurting. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And you have the cost of Occupy Oakland, which will probably be several million dollars. Luckily for the first time in many years we have a full reserve and it will mean other things won’t get done in the city unfortunately\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Where do you see the opportunity for Oakland to bounce back and keep growing? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Oakland is in the center of the Bay Area and we’re an amazing city. Downtown Oakland is one of the most exciting places in the Bay Area. Just six months ago the New York Times said we have some of the best restaurants in the Bay area. We have a thriving art scene. If you come down on First Friday, you’ll see thousands of people visiting our art galleries and enjoying music and nightclubs downtown. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Oakland was one of the few cities predicted by the Association of Bay Area Governments to continue to grow in jobs and housing over the next decade. I think that’s going to happen. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Unfortunately there’s a national stereotype about Oakland. But it’s one of the most diverse, exciting cities in the country. We’re going to come back. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Do you have any concerns as to Occupy protesters either at Snow Park or a retrenching at Frank Ogawa?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I was very heartened the night we cleared the park that the protesters were very peaceful, that they talked about getting on with the work of the 99%. I’ve been following all the tweets in the different groups; they’re going to start organizing around the school closures in Oakland. I understand there’s going to be some picketing of banks this weekend. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Snow Park people have till Monday; they have a group of people that have been working really hard to find an alternative place. I hear one of the local churches may be willing to work with them. I think we move on, and it could be a model for the rest of the country. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I think the movement’s gotten diverted on the encampments and across the country they haven’t really been able to contain the crime or the large homeless population and it becomes a whole sap on the resources instead of moving on with the organizing. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In Oakland, our winter shelter opened yesterday so we’re hoping that a large number of the homeless that were staying in Frank Ogawa Plaza will be sheltered there for the rest of the winter. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>\u003cbr>\nHave you notified Snow Park that Monday is the day to go?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>They made a deal with the police chief. All last week we tried to get people to leave. I myself talked to nine or ten of the tents that were in Frank Ogawa Plaza. The police chief gave them a week to find a permanent home. We expect them to be gone by next Monday.\u003c/p>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102887,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 30,
"wordCount": 1397
},
"headData": {
"title": "Interview: Jean Quan on Failure of Measure I, Occupy Oakland, Snow Park, and Oakland the City | KQED",
"description": "Oakland Mayor Jean Quan has not had an auspicious five weeks, even her diminishing contingent of supporters would agree. In fact, cataloguing her recent woes is no small task: Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts resigns Police and Occupy Demonstrators Clash in Oakland Occupy Oakland: Jean Quan ‘I don’t know everything’ Mayor Jean Quan Apologizes to",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Interview: Jean Quan on Failure of Measure I, Occupy Oakland, Snow Park, and Oakland the City",
"datePublished": "2011-11-17T13:30:53-08:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:08:07-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/47400/interview-jean-quan-on-failure-of-measure-i-occupy-oakland-snow-park-and-oakland-the-city",
"audioUrl": "http://ww2.kqed.org/news/files/2011/11/quanjohnson.mp3",
"audioDuration": null,
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>Oakland Mayor Jean Quan has not had an auspicious five weeks, even her diminishing contingent of supporters would agree. In fact, cataloguing her recent woes is no small task: \u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19089606\">Oakland Police Chief Anthony Batts resigns\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/10/25/police-arrest-protesters-tear-down-occupy-oakland-tent-city/\">Police and Occupy Demonstrators Clash in Oakland\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-10-27/news/30331150_1_police-raid-oakland-mayor-jean-quan-police-officers\">Occupy Oakland: Jean Quan ‘I don’t know everything’\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://blogs.sfweekly.com/thesnitch/2011/10/mayor_jean_quan_apologizes_to.php\">Mayor Jean Quan Apologizes to Occupy Oakland, Gets Booed Off Stage\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&ved=0CC4QFjAC&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ibtimes.com%2Farticles%2F242783%2F20111103%2Foakland-mayor-criticized-police-officers-response-occupy.htm&ei=sHPFTo2eEISWiQKbivHgBQ&usg=AFQjCNEkjhNrimRQZFhDpjk5YOEboaOgyQ&sig2=RkrX1Yt76jEX-iSE1JbSlg\">Oakland Mayor criticized by Police Officers for Her Response to Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_19184212\">Quan opponents file for her recall, hoping to turn 71 signatures into 20,000\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/blogpost/post/mayor-jean-quans-oakland-dream-turned-nightmare/2011/10/28/gIQAfQBJPM_blog.html\">Mayor Jean Quan’s ‘Oakland dream turned nightmare’\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/video/6454230-quan-approval-rating-stays-low-despite-2nd-occupy-raid/\">CBS 5 Poll: Oaklanders Unhappy With Mayor Quan, Handling Of Protests\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ibtimes.com/articles/250038/20111115/occupy-oakland-deputy-mayor-quits-hours-quan.htm/\">Deputy Mayor Quits Hours After Quan’s Senior Legal Adviser\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_19344174\">Oakland Mayor Jean Quan loses her choice for port commission\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/video/6454230-quan-approval-rating-stays-low-despite-2nd-occupy-raid/\">Quan Approval Rating Stays Low Despite 2nd Occupy Raid\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.eastbayexpress.com/92510/archives/2011/04/06/wednesday-must-read-quans-parcel-tax-voted-down-abc-security-loses-city-contract\">Quan’s parcel tax voted down\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47613\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/jeanquanSM.jpg\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/jeanquanSM.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"jeanquanSM\" width=\"300\" height=\"198\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47613\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>I actually could go on, but you get the picture…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Journalist \u003ca href=\"http://www.californiareport.org/archive/R201111041630/a\">Josh Richman recently told KQED’s Scott Shafer\u003c/a> that he didn’t know if there’s anything Quan can do to recover. Still, Quan is only one year into a four-year term. Crisis communications consultant Chris Lehane — who knows from political low points (think Monica Lewinsky. He helped manage that scandal in the Clinton White House) — \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/07/interview-political-consultant-chris-lehane-on-how-big-city-mayors-should-handle-occupy-wall-street-protests/\">told Scott Shafer last week\u003c/a> that Quan can still come back from the Occupy Oakland crisis.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“I think ultimately people in these positions will be evaluated over the long term,” Lehane said. “She’s apologized, which is important, particularly for politicians, who almost never apologize. This situation is so big, there’s going to be little she can do in the day to day. Politicians have to realize you’re not going to immediately come back, they have to have a long-term strategy.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“Given her history, that she came up through community activism, she’s someone who can step up with an interesting policy or program and seize the moment in a positive way.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Yesterday, KQED’s Joshua Johnson interviewed Quan fresh off her defeat on Measure I, a $60 million parcel tax that would have been used for a range of services related to public safety, city services, and infrastructure needs. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>One thing in particular I found interesting about the mayor’s answers, as well as those she gave in a recent \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/09/mayor-quan-on-all-things-considered-weve-got-the-extended-interview/\">national interview with NPR\u003c/a>, is how sympathetic she appears to be to the Occupy movement’s goals and even its internal processes, going so far in the NPR segment as to explain in detail the reasoning behind the Occupy Oakland general assembly’s refusal to let her address the encampment. To which All Things Considered correspondent Martin Kaste said, almost incredulously, “but you’re the mayor!” \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here is Joshua Johnson’s interview. A transcript follows the audio. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/quanjohnson.mp3\">\u003cstrong>Audio: Jean Quan on Failure of Measure I, Occupy Oakland, and the City’s Economy\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "audio",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": ":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/quanjohnson.mp3|titles=quanjohnson"
},
"numeric": [
":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/quanjohnson.mp3|titles=quanjohnson"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What are your thoughts on the outcome of the Measure I election? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s not surprising. Even the San Francisco tax measures went down. In Oakland we’ve been a little distracted so the people who normally would have been out there campaigning for this didn’t have much time to work for it. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But it means we will not be able to restore some of the services we cut. At the beginning of the year I put out several options, including an all-cuts budget. Luckily the employees of the city gave back 10 %., undertaking for the first time major pension reform relief in the city. Even the police are now paying into their pension. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We could have restored some of the cuts, some full-time senior programs, some road and tree people, some park maintenance people, to add and upgrade our technology at the libraries, which needs constant funding to keep the internet and other services going. And probably most importantly for Oaklanders, it was going to allow us the extra money for police recruitment and training. The baby boomers are retiring and the replacement of police officers are probably the most expensive cost. It costs us about 100k to train and recruit new police officers. With boomers retiring at a higher rate, we really don’t necessarily have enough money right now to keep up with that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>My biggest hope is that the economy in Oakland swings up a bit. We’re hoping to make a couple of good announcements on new projects in Oakland and eventually we’ll be able to cover that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>It seems like all of this has been something of a double whammy. You’ve got the Occupy protesters which scared off some business….\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Yes, we had this perfect storm. I think it would have been hard to pass Measure I anyway. But we thought we had to try to give Oaklanders a chance to try to step up. It would have been a quarter a day. Otherwise what we have now is an all-cuts budget. We have the potential loss of a couple of businesses downtown. And a lot of small businesses are really hurting. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And you have the cost of Occupy Oakland, which will probably be several million dollars. Luckily for the first time in many years we have a full reserve and it will mean other things won’t get done in the city unfortunately\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Where do you see the opportunity for Oakland to bounce back and keep growing? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Oakland is in the center of the Bay Area and we’re an amazing city. Downtown Oakland is one of the most exciting places in the Bay Area. Just six months ago the New York Times said we have some of the best restaurants in the Bay area. We have a thriving art scene. If you come down on First Friday, you’ll see thousands of people visiting our art galleries and enjoying music and nightclubs downtown. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Oakland was one of the few cities predicted by the Association of Bay Area Governments to continue to grow in jobs and housing over the next decade. I think that’s going to happen. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Unfortunately there’s a national stereotype about Oakland. But it’s one of the most diverse, exciting cities in the country. We’re going to come back. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Do you have any concerns as to Occupy protesters either at Snow Park or a retrenching at Frank Ogawa?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I was very heartened the night we cleared the park that the protesters were very peaceful, that they talked about getting on with the work of the 99%. I’ve been following all the tweets in the different groups; they’re going to start organizing around the school closures in Oakland. I understand there’s going to be some picketing of banks this weekend. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Snow Park people have till Monday; they have a group of people that have been working really hard to find an alternative place. I hear one of the local churches may be willing to work with them. I think we move on, and it could be a model for the rest of the country. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I think the movement’s gotten diverted on the encampments and across the country they haven’t really been able to contain the crime or the large homeless population and it becomes a whole sap on the resources instead of moving on with the organizing. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In Oakland, our winter shelter opened yesterday so we’re hoping that a large number of the homeless that were staying in Frank Ogawa Plaza will be sheltered there for the rest of the winter. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>\u003cbr>\nHave you notified Snow Park that Monday is the day to go?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>They made a deal with the police chief. All last week we tried to get people to leave. I myself talked to nine or ten of the tents that were in Frank Ogawa Plaza. The police chief gave them a week to find a permanent home. We expect them to be gone by next Monday.\u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/47400/interview-jean-quan-on-failure-of-measure-i-occupy-oakland-snow-park-and-oakland-the-city",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_13"
],
"tags": [
"news_20013",
"news_204",
"news_166",
"news_2083",
"news_1963",
"news_17968"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_44907": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_44907",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "44907",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1319842420000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "ranked-choice-voting-explained",
"title": "Ranked-Choice Voting Explained",
"publishDate": 1319842420,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Ranked-Choice Voting Explained | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_45043\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/10/rcv-demo-ballot-400x400.gif\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-45043\" title=\"rcv-demo-ballot-400x400\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/10/rcv-demo-ballot-400x400-300x300.gif\" alt=\"Ranked-choir voting demonstration ballot\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ranked-choice voting demonstration ballot (Courtesy SFGov.org)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>In November San Franciscans choose their next mayor through an electoral process called ranked-choice voting (RCV). Also known as “instant run-off voting,” voters will pick three candidates (instead of one), and rank them in order of preference, eliminating the need for a separate runoff election.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Although this is not the first time San Francisco has employed this system (RCV was first used in 2004 for a board of supervisors race and again in the 2007 mayoral race, when Gavin Newsom was reelected with 72% of the vote) it is the first time the city is using it to decide a competitive mayor’s race that has a large candidate pool. And many are waiting to see how well it all works out.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Not surprisingly, RCV has its discontents; some candidates stand to benefit more than others, and a variety of opponents have cried foul, calling the system too complex and undemocratic. Last year, the system survived a court challenge alleging that it violated voters’ rights.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The biggest issue at play is that you no longer need to be the top vote-getter in the first round in order to win the election; instead you need the most-combined first, second, and third choice votes. And that significantly changes the calculus. Factor in that there are a grand total of 16 candidates running for mayor this year, and you’ve got yourself a pretty thick electoral swamp to wade through.\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So, how’d this all begin? Well, San Franciscans voted on it (ah, the irony!). In 2002, residents approved Proposition A, effectively amending the city’s charter. The RCV system’s actually been used in smaller San Francisco elections since 2004, but never for such a high-stakes contest. It used to be you just voted for one candidate, and if no one received over 50% of the votes, a December runoff election was held, and the winner was then determined by whoever got the most votes. RCV will now be used to elect all of the city’s major elected positions, including members of the Board of Supervisors. But with Election Day just a few weeks away there still seem to be a whole lot of voters out there unfamiliar – or just flat out confused – with how RCV works. So, here’s our best stab at explaining the rules of the game:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>First off, a quick preview of what the new ballot looks like. A good mock-up is available at San Francisco’s Department of Election’s site. The basic format is fairly simple: Three side-by-side columns (first-choice, second-choice and third-choice). Each column includes the names of all 16 candidates.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 1: An Even Starting Line\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nFrom the pool of 16 candidates, you pick your first, second, and third choices. (Note: you don’t have to pick three; if you want, you can just pick your first-choice, or your first two choices, etc. It also doesn’t do you any good to repeatedly pick your first-choice three times – it’ll only be counted once.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If any candidate gets more than 50 percent (50% +1) of first-choice votes, that candidate is automatically elected. Game over. But, if no one receives that majority, we go to the second round.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So just for kicks (and because puppets are more fun than politicians), let’s pretend we’re observing a heated mayoral race on Sesame Street (Just ignore that streets don’t typically have mayors, or the fact that the candidates are made of felt and fur.). There are four candidates running, and a total of 24 voters casting ballots.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Cookie Monster (the clear frontrunner, of course, well loved for his oratorical gifts and promises of free pastries to every supporter) gets 10 first-place votes. Oscar the Grouch gets 8 first place votes (with strong support from the waste management industry and a large contingent of the generally disgruntled). Big Bird gets 4 first-place votes. And poor, impetuous Grover gets only 2 first-place votes. Since no one got more than 12 votes, there’s no clear majority, but we do have our first loser … so we move on to Round 2.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 2: The First Elimination\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nGrover, the candidate with the least amount of first-choice votes, is outta there! But (and here’s the part that seems to trip people up the most), for the two voters who picked Grover as a first-choice, their second-choice votes still count. Here’s how:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>One of the voters who chose Grover picked Oscar as a second choice. So that vote goes to Oscar (who now has a total of 9 votes). The other voter in Grover’s small fan club picked Cookie Monster as a second choice. So, that vote goes to Cookie Monster (who now has 11 votes).\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>At the end of Round 2, here’s the tally:\u003cbr>\nCookie Monster: 11 votes\u003cbr>\nOscar: 9 votes\u003cbr>\nBig Bird: 4 votes\u003cbr>\nStill no clear winner (because there still are three candidates standing), so onto Round 3 we go!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 3: The Deciding Moment\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nThree candidates left, and Big Bird’s got the least amount of first-choice votes (only 4), so that oversized avian is done! Now, we look at the second-choice votes of those four voters who picked Big Bird as their first-choice. Remarkably, as it turns out, all four of Big Bird’s second-choice votes were for Oscar! That means that Oscar picks up four more votes, giving him (or it?) a final tally of 13 votes to Cookie Monster’s 11 votes. And thus, that grumpy, trash-dwelling green dude is the new boss in town.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>O.K., so in the San Francisco mayoral election, things might not be quite that simple (and all the candidates are probably going to have noses). But, hopefully this example does illustrate how a candidate can viably receive the most first-choice votes and still lose the election. Because there are 16 candidates in the real race, that same elimination process keeps going until one candidate emerges with the most votes.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>One key to understanding the RCV instant runoff process is remembering that the number of elimination rounds is determined by the number of candidates running. So, in the case of San Francisco’s mayoral race: there are 16 candidates, thus, 15 elimination rounds to determine a winner. In the Sesame Street scenario, there are a total of 4 candidates, requiring three elimination rounds to determine the winner. Just think of it as last man/woman/puppet standing. Take a look:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 1\u003c/strong>: Four candidates on the ballot with a total of 24 votes cast.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>C. Monster O. Grouch B. Bird Grover Total votes\u003cbr>\n10 votes 8 votes 4 votes 2 votes 24\u003cstrong>\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 2\u003c/strong>: Three candidates standing; Grover is eliminated and his votes go to Cookie Monster and Oscar. Remember that all 24 votes still count, but some have just been transferred to other candidates.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>C. Monster O. Grouch B. Bird Total votes\u003cbr>\n11 votes 9 votes 4 votes 24\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ctt>\u003c/tt>\u003cstrong>Round 3\u003c/strong>: Two candidates left; Big Bird is eliminated and all four of his votes go to Oscar (because the people who voted for Big Bird as their first-choice picked Oscar as their second-choice.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>C. Monster O. Grouch Total votes\u003cbr>\n11 votes 13 votes 24\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>With 13 votes to Cookie Monster’s 11, Oscar the Grouch is the winner!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Oakland’s 2010 Mayoral Election\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nLast year, Oakland used RCV to elect its mayor and witnessed a similar outcome: There were 10 candidates, and Don Perata, the clear frontrunner (who vastly outspent his opponents during the campaign), got 35% of the first-choice votes. That left Jean Quan in a distant second with only 24% of first-choice votes. But Quan – who anticipated this outcome and allied herself with other underdog candidates and their supporters – received far more second-choice votes than did Perata. And after all the elimination rounds, with second and third-choice votes factored in, Quan received 51% of the vote to Perata’s 49%.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>The Critics\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nSo is RCV a good thing? The jury’s still out. It really depends on who you ask. (Oakland’s Mayor Quan, I’m guessing would say yes; Don Perata … not so much. Oscar the Grouch though, is definitely a big fan.)\u003cbr>\nLike pretty much everything in politics, the system’s got its strong supporters and staunch enemies.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Some of the big arguments from supporters of RCV:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>It could save taxpayers millions by eliminating the need for local primaries and separate runoff elections.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It boosts electoral competition because candidates only have to raise money for one election per cycle, not two or three.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It gives underdog candidates a better chance and produces a winner that’s supported by a clear majority.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It discourages mudslinging and negative campaigning; candidates are now more likely to ally with each.\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Opponents say:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>It’s too confusing for voters and unnecessarily adds to the complexity of an already complicated ballot.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>There is lots of room for technical error as election computers tally results through the use of a complicated algorithm.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It encourages less popular candidates to game the system by teaming up against the frontrunner. Is this is a fair or appropriate strategy? Depends who you ask.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It’s discriminatory to less educated or knowledgeable segments of the voting public who haven’t received sufficient instruction on how the system works.\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Need a Visual Aid?\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nKQED TV’s \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/tv/programs/thisweek/\">This Week\u003c/a> got a rundown straight from the San Francisco Department of Elections. Watch the video below:\u003cbr>\n[youtube http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlyL1SEiCLQ?hd=1]\u003c/p>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102854,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": true,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 30,
"wordCount": 1753
},
"headData": {
"title": "Ranked-Choice Voting Explained | KQED",
"description": "In November San Franciscans choose their next mayor through an electoral process called ranked-choice voting (RCV). Also known as “instant run-off voting,” voters will pick three candidates (instead of one), and rank them in order of preference, eliminating the need for a separate runoff election. Although this is not the first time San Francisco has",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Ranked-Choice Voting Explained",
"datePublished": "2011-10-28T15:53:40-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:07:34-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/44907/ranked-choice-voting-explained",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_45043\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/10/rcv-demo-ballot-400x400.gif\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-45043\" title=\"rcv-demo-ballot-400x400\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/10/rcv-demo-ballot-400x400-300x300.gif\" alt=\"Ranked-choir voting demonstration ballot\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Ranked-choice voting demonstration ballot (Courtesy SFGov.org)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>In November San Franciscans choose their next mayor through an electoral process called ranked-choice voting (RCV). Also known as “instant run-off voting,” voters will pick three candidates (instead of one), and rank them in order of preference, eliminating the need for a separate runoff election.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Although this is not the first time San Francisco has employed this system (RCV was first used in 2004 for a board of supervisors race and again in the 2007 mayoral race, when Gavin Newsom was reelected with 72% of the vote) it is the first time the city is using it to decide a competitive mayor’s race that has a large candidate pool. And many are waiting to see how well it all works out.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Not surprisingly, RCV has its discontents; some candidates stand to benefit more than others, and a variety of opponents have cried foul, calling the system too complex and undemocratic. Last year, the system survived a court challenge alleging that it violated voters’ rights.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The biggest issue at play is that you no longer need to be the top vote-getter in the first round in order to win the election; instead you need the most-combined first, second, and third choice votes. And that significantly changes the calculus. Factor in that there are a grand total of 16 candidates running for mayor this year, and you’ve got yourself a pretty thick electoral swamp to wade through.\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So, how’d this all begin? Well, San Franciscans voted on it (ah, the irony!). In 2002, residents approved Proposition A, effectively amending the city’s charter. The RCV system’s actually been used in smaller San Francisco elections since 2004, but never for such a high-stakes contest. It used to be you just voted for one candidate, and if no one received over 50% of the votes, a December runoff election was held, and the winner was then determined by whoever got the most votes. RCV will now be used to elect all of the city’s major elected positions, including members of the Board of Supervisors. But with Election Day just a few weeks away there still seem to be a whole lot of voters out there unfamiliar – or just flat out confused – with how RCV works. So, here’s our best stab at explaining the rules of the game:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>First off, a quick preview of what the new ballot looks like. A good mock-up is available at San Francisco’s Department of Election’s site. The basic format is fairly simple: Three side-by-side columns (first-choice, second-choice and third-choice). Each column includes the names of all 16 candidates.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 1: An Even Starting Line\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nFrom the pool of 16 candidates, you pick your first, second, and third choices. (Note: you don’t have to pick three; if you want, you can just pick your first-choice, or your first two choices, etc. It also doesn’t do you any good to repeatedly pick your first-choice three times – it’ll only be counted once.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If any candidate gets more than 50 percent (50% +1) of first-choice votes, that candidate is automatically elected. Game over. But, if no one receives that majority, we go to the second round.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So just for kicks (and because puppets are more fun than politicians), let’s pretend we’re observing a heated mayoral race on Sesame Street (Just ignore that streets don’t typically have mayors, or the fact that the candidates are made of felt and fur.). There are four candidates running, and a total of 24 voters casting ballots.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Cookie Monster (the clear frontrunner, of course, well loved for his oratorical gifts and promises of free pastries to every supporter) gets 10 first-place votes. Oscar the Grouch gets 8 first place votes (with strong support from the waste management industry and a large contingent of the generally disgruntled). Big Bird gets 4 first-place votes. And poor, impetuous Grover gets only 2 first-place votes. Since no one got more than 12 votes, there’s no clear majority, but we do have our first loser … so we move on to Round 2.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 2: The First Elimination\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nGrover, the candidate with the least amount of first-choice votes, is outta there! But (and here’s the part that seems to trip people up the most), for the two voters who picked Grover as a first-choice, their second-choice votes still count. Here’s how:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>One of the voters who chose Grover picked Oscar as a second choice. So that vote goes to Oscar (who now has a total of 9 votes). The other voter in Grover’s small fan club picked Cookie Monster as a second choice. So, that vote goes to Cookie Monster (who now has 11 votes).\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>At the end of Round 2, here’s the tally:\u003cbr>\nCookie Monster: 11 votes\u003cbr>\nOscar: 9 votes\u003cbr>\nBig Bird: 4 votes\u003cbr>\nStill no clear winner (because there still are three candidates standing), so onto Round 3 we go!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 3: The Deciding Moment\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nThree candidates left, and Big Bird’s got the least amount of first-choice votes (only 4), so that oversized avian is done! Now, we look at the second-choice votes of those four voters who picked Big Bird as their first-choice. Remarkably, as it turns out, all four of Big Bird’s second-choice votes were for Oscar! That means that Oscar picks up four more votes, giving him (or it?) a final tally of 13 votes to Cookie Monster’s 11 votes. And thus, that grumpy, trash-dwelling green dude is the new boss in town.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>O.K., so in the San Francisco mayoral election, things might not be quite that simple (and all the candidates are probably going to have noses). But, hopefully this example does illustrate how a candidate can viably receive the most first-choice votes and still lose the election. Because there are 16 candidates in the real race, that same elimination process keeps going until one candidate emerges with the most votes.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>One key to understanding the RCV instant runoff process is remembering that the number of elimination rounds is determined by the number of candidates running. So, in the case of San Francisco’s mayoral race: there are 16 candidates, thus, 15 elimination rounds to determine a winner. In the Sesame Street scenario, there are a total of 4 candidates, requiring three elimination rounds to determine the winner. Just think of it as last man/woman/puppet standing. Take a look:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 1\u003c/strong>: Four candidates on the ballot with a total of 24 votes cast.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>C. Monster O. Grouch B. Bird Grover Total votes\u003cbr>\n10 votes 8 votes 4 votes 2 votes 24\u003cstrong>\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Round 2\u003c/strong>: Three candidates standing; Grover is eliminated and his votes go to Cookie Monster and Oscar. Remember that all 24 votes still count, but some have just been transferred to other candidates.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>C. Monster O. Grouch B. Bird Total votes\u003cbr>\n11 votes 9 votes 4 votes 24\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ctt>\u003c/tt>\u003cstrong>Round 3\u003c/strong>: Two candidates left; Big Bird is eliminated and all four of his votes go to Oscar (because the people who voted for Big Bird as their first-choice picked Oscar as their second-choice.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>C. Monster O. Grouch Total votes\u003cbr>\n11 votes 13 votes 24\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>With 13 votes to Cookie Monster’s 11, Oscar the Grouch is the winner!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Oakland’s 2010 Mayoral Election\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nLast year, Oakland used RCV to elect its mayor and witnessed a similar outcome: There were 10 candidates, and Don Perata, the clear frontrunner (who vastly outspent his opponents during the campaign), got 35% of the first-choice votes. That left Jean Quan in a distant second with only 24% of first-choice votes. But Quan – who anticipated this outcome and allied herself with other underdog candidates and their supporters – received far more second-choice votes than did Perata. And after all the elimination rounds, with second and third-choice votes factored in, Quan received 51% of the vote to Perata’s 49%.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>The Critics\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nSo is RCV a good thing? The jury’s still out. It really depends on who you ask. (Oakland’s Mayor Quan, I’m guessing would say yes; Don Perata … not so much. Oscar the Grouch though, is definitely a big fan.)\u003cbr>\nLike pretty much everything in politics, the system’s got its strong supporters and staunch enemies.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Some of the big arguments from supporters of RCV:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>It could save taxpayers millions by eliminating the need for local primaries and separate runoff elections.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It boosts electoral competition because candidates only have to raise money for one election per cycle, not two or three.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It gives underdog candidates a better chance and produces a winner that’s supported by a clear majority.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It discourages mudslinging and negative campaigning; candidates are now more likely to ally with each.\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Opponents say:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>It’s too confusing for voters and unnecessarily adds to the complexity of an already complicated ballot.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>There is lots of room for technical error as election computers tally results through the use of a complicated algorithm.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It encourages less popular candidates to game the system by teaming up against the frontrunner. Is this is a fair or appropriate strategy? Depends who you ask.\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>It’s discriminatory to less educated or knowledgeable segments of the voting public who haven’t received sufficient instruction on how the system works.\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Need a Visual Aid?\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nKQED TV’s \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/tv/programs/thisweek/\">This Week\u003c/a> got a rundown straight from the San Francisco Department of Elections. Watch the video below:\u003cbr>\n\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003cspan class='utils-parseShortcode-shortcodes-__youtubeShortcode__embedYoutube'>\n \u003cspan class='utils-parseShortcode-shortcodes-__youtubeShortcode__embedYoutubeInside'>\n \u003ciframe\n loading='lazy'\n class='utils-parseShortcode-shortcodes-__youtubeShortcode__youtubePlayer'\n type='text/html'\n src='//www.youtube.com/embed/SlyL1SEiCLQ?hd=1'\n title='//www.youtube.com/embed/SlyL1SEiCLQ?hd=1'\n allowfullscreen='true'\n style='border:0;'>\u003c/iframe>\n \u003c/span>\n \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/44907/ranked-choice-voting-explained",
"authors": [
"1263"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_13"
],
"tags": [
"news_17968",
"news_211",
"news_38",
"news_150",
"news_2027"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_41401": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_41401",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "41401",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1317331219000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "video-the-taiwanese-animators-on-uc-berkeley-republican-bake-sale",
"title": "Video: The Taiwanese Animators on UC Berkeley Republican Bake Sale",
"publishDate": 1317331219,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Video: The Taiwanese Animators on UC Berkeley Republican Bake Sale | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>Next Media Animation, aka the Taiwanese animators, have filed a report on the “\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/27/uc-berkeley-diversity-bake-sale/\">increase diversity bake sale\u003c/a>” by UC Berkeley Republicans the other day. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The \u003ca href=\"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIswBervGZc&feature=player_embedded\">video\u003c/a> mysteriously omits the main component of the satirical student stunt — charging caucasians more for baked goods than customers from other races were asked to pay. Maybe it’s hard to animate cupcakes…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"http://www.youtube.com/embed/YIswBervGZc\" frameborder=\"0\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If you missed Tuesday’s debate about this event on KQED Radio 88.5’s Forum show, \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/27/uc-berkeley-diversity-bake-sale/\">here it is\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/next-media-animation/\">more local coverage from Next Media Animation here\u003c/a>. \u003c/p>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102751,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": true,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 8,
"wordCount": 96
},
"headData": {
"title": "Video: The Taiwanese Animators on UC Berkeley Republican Bake Sale | KQED",
"description": "Next Media Animation, aka the Taiwanese animators, have filed a report on the “increase diversity bake sale” by UC Berkeley Republicans the other day. The video mysteriously omits the main component of the satirical student stunt — charging caucasians more for baked goods than customers from other races were asked to pay. Maybe it’s hard",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Video: The Taiwanese Animators on UC Berkeley Republican Bake Sale",
"datePublished": "2011-09-29T14:20:19-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:05:51-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/41401/video-the-taiwanese-animators-on-uc-berkeley-republican-bake-sale",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>Next Media Animation, aka the Taiwanese animators, have filed a report on the “\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/27/uc-berkeley-diversity-bake-sale/\">increase diversity bake sale\u003c/a>” by UC Berkeley Republicans the other day. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The \u003ca href=\"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIswBervGZc&feature=player_embedded\">video\u003c/a> mysteriously omits the main component of the satirical student stunt — charging caucasians more for baked goods than customers from other races were asked to pay. Maybe it’s hard to animate cupcakes…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" width=\"500\" height=\"281\" src=\"http://www.youtube.com/embed/YIswBervGZc\" frameborder=\"0\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If you missed Tuesday’s debate about this event on KQED Radio 88.5’s Forum show, \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/27/uc-berkeley-diversity-bake-sale/\">here it is\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/next-media-animation/\">more local coverage from Next Media Animation here\u003c/a>. \u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/41401/video-the-taiwanese-animators-on-uc-berkeley-republican-bake-sale",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_223",
"news_18540"
],
"tags": [
"news_1895",
"news_1784",
"news_17968",
"news_757",
"news_98"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_41121": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_41121",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "41121",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1317164111000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "photos-republican-diversity-bake-sale",
"title": "Photos: Republican \"Diversity Bake Sale\"",
"publishDate": 1317164111,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Photos: Republican “Diversity Bake Sale” | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>Caitlin Esch is covering the bake-sale to do at UC Berkeley today and snapped the photos below. The “Increase Diversity Bake Sale” is being held by Berkeley College Republicans. The event, intended as a satirical protest against \u003ca href=\"http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_185&sess=CUR&house=B&author=hernandez\">SB 185\u003c/a>, affirmative action legislation being considered by Gov. Jerry Brown, prices baked good lower for non-white students.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/27/uc-berkeley-diversity-bake-sale/\">More on the event here\u003c/a>…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003ca href=\"http://sfist.com/2011/09/27/photos_uc_berkeleys_inflammatory_ba.php#photo-1\">\u003cstrong>SFist also has photos\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>, as does \u003ca href=\"http://www.berkeleyside.com/2011/09/27/diversity-bake-sale-brings-out-protestors-choppers-media/\">\u003cstrong>Berkeleyside\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> and \u003ca href=\"http://www.dailycal.org/2011/09/27/live-blog-increase-diversity-bake-sale/\">\u003cstrong>The Daily Cal\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Oh, and the \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2011/09/27/BABR1L9PQL.DTL&object=%2Fc%2Fpictures%2F2011%2F09%2F27%2Fba-Berkeley_Dive_0504243822.jpg\">\u003cstrong>Chronicle\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>. And the \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2011/09/27/BABR1L9PQL.DTL&object=%2Fc%2Fpictures%2F2011%2F09%2F27%2Fba-Berkeley_Dive_0504243822.jpg\">\u003cstrong>Bay Area News Group\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102754,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 7,
"wordCount": 88
},
"headData": {
"title": "Photos: Republican \"Diversity Bake Sale\" | KQED",
"description": "Caitlin Esch is covering the bake-sale to do at UC Berkeley today and snapped the photos below. The “Increase Diversity Bake Sale” is being held by Berkeley College Republicans. The event, intended as a satirical protest against SB 185, affirmative action legislation being considered by Gov. Jerry Brown, prices baked good lower for non-white students.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Photos: Republican \"Diversity Bake Sale\"",
"datePublished": "2011-09-27T15:55:11-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:05:54-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/41121/photos-republican-diversity-bake-sale",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>Caitlin Esch is covering the bake-sale to do at UC Berkeley today and snapped the photos below. The “Increase Diversity Bake Sale” is being held by Berkeley College Republicans. The event, intended as a satirical protest against \u003ca href=\"http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/cgi-bin/postquery?bill_number=sb_185&sess=CUR&house=B&author=hernandez\">SB 185\u003c/a>, affirmative action legislation being considered by Gov. Jerry Brown, prices baked good lower for non-white students.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/09/27/uc-berkeley-diversity-bake-sale/\">More on the event here\u003c/a>…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003ca href=\"http://sfist.com/2011/09/27/photos_uc_berkeleys_inflammatory_ba.php#photo-1\">\u003cstrong>SFist also has photos\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>, as does \u003ca href=\"http://www.berkeleyside.com/2011/09/27/diversity-bake-sale-brings-out-protestors-choppers-media/\">\u003cstrong>Berkeleyside\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> and \u003ca href=\"http://www.dailycal.org/2011/09/27/live-blog-increase-diversity-bake-sale/\">\u003cstrong>The Daily Cal\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Oh, and the \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2011/09/27/BABR1L9PQL.DTL&object=%2Fc%2Fpictures%2F2011%2F09%2F27%2Fba-Berkeley_Dive_0504243822.jpg\">\u003cstrong>Chronicle\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>. And the \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?f=/c/a/2011/09/27/BABR1L9PQL.DTL&object=%2Fc%2Fpictures%2F2011%2F09%2F27%2Fba-Berkeley_Dive_0504243822.jpg\">\u003cstrong>Bay Area News Group\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/41121/photos-republican-diversity-bake-sale",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_18540",
"news_8"
],
"tags": [
"news_1895",
"news_17968",
"news_757",
"news_98"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_40879": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_40879",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "40879",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1316814946000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "just-how-bad-is-san-joses-budget-situation-really",
"title": "Just How Bad is San Jose's Budget Situation, Really?",
"publishDate": 1316814946,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Just How Bad is San Jose’s Budget Situation, Really? | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_40888\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 250px\">\u003ca href=\"http://www.flickr.com/photos/mamboman/261375741/\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-40888\" title=\"sanjosecityhallSM\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/09/sanjosecityhallSM.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"188\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">San Jose City Hall (Photo: Rainer Hungershausen)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>On Wednesday of this week, one could read an \u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/bay-area-news/ci_18940474?nclick_check=1\">account of the previous day’s San Jose City Council meeting\u003c/a> in the Mercury News that started this way:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Every San Jose branch library shuttered. All city community center programs shut down. No more school crossing guards or park rangers. Even fewer cops.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>That will likely be the reality for San Jose residents next summer if city officials don’t raise taxes or trim employee pensions and perks, city administrators told San Jose’s elected leaders Tuesday.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>It doesn’t take much reading of the news these days to realize what a dearth of dollars persists in local, state, and federal government. But as sky-is-falling scenarios are frequently advanced on both sides of any political issue, you always wonder just how much currency to give particularly bleak narratives like the one purveyed here. Further down in the Merc article, for example, you get this:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(T)he early budget look was also a strategic move by Mayor Chuck Reed to shore up support for his controversial pension reform proposals — which he says are critical in preventing San Jose from sliding into “service-level insolvency.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>So I asked longtime San Jose political reporter Janice Rombeck, editor and publisher of KQED News Associate \u003ca href=\"http://www.neighborwebsjdev.com/\">\u003cstrong>NeighborWebSJ\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>, just how seriously she was taking the dire predictions of severe cuts for fiscal year 2012-13 that are even more dire than those already enacted.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Very seriously, it turns out… \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s an edited transcript of my interview with her:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What happened at the City Council meeting Tuesday?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The city budget director painted three pretty grim scenarios. The first was if no new revenue comes in and if the fiscal reforms that Mayor Chuck Reed has proposed don’t get enacted. This is what the city is facing under that scenario: all libraries closed, all community centers closed or leased out to private directors, more police officers cut, no improvement done to city streets, maintenance and parks outsourced or just not done.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>City Manager Deb Figone said “this is no way to run a city of a million people.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">There was a push to sound the alarm and let people know this is for real, this is not political posturing.\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>Is this just political posturing or do these numbers really add up? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I think the numbers are real.This is much earlier than they usually start on budget projections. I think it’s because the outlook is grim, but also because they want support for these fiscal reforms, including the reduction of pension costs, the main expense that is driving these deficits. And they want to go to the ballot box probably not in June but maybe November 2012, to get a city charter change so that they can reduce pension benefits.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>If they get these pension reforms, the draconian cuts need not take place? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There probably will still be cuts in the short term because some of these cost savings won’t be realized until later on, but it won’t be as dramatic as portrayed in scenario 1. But the city is still facing cuts beyond what we’ve had here before.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What is the status of Reed’s pension reform plan? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">The city has run out of options.\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>Most of it still needs to be negotiated with the 11 unions that make up city employees. That will be the difficult part. The ballot measure will allow the city to impose reductions in benefits if it can’t be negotiated.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The city cut benefits and salaries of city employees by 10% last year, to help close the deficit in the current budget. But the Police Officers Association has filed a complaint. They want the cut to be for just one year; the city wants the cuts to be ongoing. That’s in arbitration right now, and it could be devastating to the budget if the arbitrator comes back and says the city can’t impose it again next year.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How does the public feel about pension reform?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The public is supportive of pension reform. But there was a lot of discussion at the council meeting about the public not understanding the reality of what the city is facing, and among some of the councilmembers there was a push to sound the alarm and let people know this is for real, this is not political posturing.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There has been pushback from some parts of the community who say the numbers are wrong, the actuarials are wrong, and the pension estimates and the costs are wrong. Independent auditors and insurance experts have said that’s not true, these costs are going to escalate.\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">\n\u003cp>It used to be journalists were kind of skeptical about early projections…That’s not the case anymore.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>The city has run out of options. They don’t’ feel they can cut any more employees and continue to run the government and city services. They are going to try to increase the sales tax; they just passed a medicinal marijuana ordinance that will bring in additional revenue, maybe a couple of million dollars. They’re looking under every nook and cranny. But it’s just not popular to raise taxes in a recessionary economy in which people are hurting and out of work.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Part of the other result of this is that residents are going to have to do a lot more that they have been relying on the city to do. Graffiti removal is one — the city relies on volunteers to do that. It’s not going to be business as usual in San Jose.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It used to be that journalists were kind of skeptical about early projections. There always seemed to be a little bit of crying wolf. Then when budget time came around they’d come up with the money. But I don’t see that; that’s not the case anymore. These are real numbers and real tough decisions that are going to have to be made.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve already seen it in this current budget: the anti-gang task force, the \u003ca href=\"http://www.strongneighborhoods.org/\">Strong Neighborhoods\u003c/a> initiative, anti-graffiti and anti-litter programs that are nationally known and have been held up as models for providing city services have been decimated or at least drastically cut. There are no sacred cows, there are no easy ways to balance this budge anymore.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>You can \u003ca href=\"http://sanjose.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=5314\">watch an archive of Tuesday’s City Council meeting\u003c/a> at the San Jose web site.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>Update Sep 27\u003c/em> Janice Krombeck received this email from Mayor Reed’s office today:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(We) want to point out…that the Mayor, and many of his colleagues on the Council, are currently targeting a March 2012 special election for\u003cbr>\nfiscal reforms (not June or November). If we get voter approval in March, we’ll have just enough time to implement the pension changes in time to achieve savings in FY 12-13. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve been trying to do our best to make sure the media (and through them, our employees and the public) are aware of the timeline we’re working on. Esp. since the whole reason for doing this is to try\u003cbr>\nand get the savings needed to avoid those devastating impacts next June.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1729884208,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 34,
"wordCount": 1251
},
"headData": {
"title": "Just How Bad is San Jose's Budget Situation, Really? | KQED",
"description": "On Wednesday of this week, one could read an account of the previous day's San Jose City Council meeting in the Mercury News that started this way: Every San Jose branch library shuttered. All city community center programs shut down. No more school crossing guards or park rangers. Even fewer cops. That will likely be the reality for San Jose residents next summer if city officials don't raise taxes or trim employee pensions and perks, city administrators told San Jose's elected leaders Tuesday. It doesn't take much reading of the news these days to realize what a dearth of dollars",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Just How Bad is San Jose's Budget Situation, Really?",
"datePublished": "2011-09-23T14:55:46-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-10-25T12:23:28-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/40879/just-how-bad-is-san-joses-budget-situation-really",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_40888\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 250px\">\u003ca href=\"http://www.flickr.com/photos/mamboman/261375741/\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-full wp-image-40888\" title=\"sanjosecityhallSM\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/09/sanjosecityhallSM.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"250\" height=\"188\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">San Jose City Hall (Photo: Rainer Hungershausen)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>On Wednesday of this week, one could read an \u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/bay-area-news/ci_18940474?nclick_check=1\">account of the previous day’s San Jose City Council meeting\u003c/a> in the Mercury News that started this way:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Every San Jose branch library shuttered. All city community center programs shut down. No more school crossing guards or park rangers. Even fewer cops.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>That will likely be the reality for San Jose residents next summer if city officials don’t raise taxes or trim employee pensions and perks, city administrators told San Jose’s elected leaders Tuesday.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>It doesn’t take much reading of the news these days to realize what a dearth of dollars persists in local, state, and federal government. But as sky-is-falling scenarios are frequently advanced on both sides of any political issue, you always wonder just how much currency to give particularly bleak narratives like the one purveyed here. Further down in the Merc article, for example, you get this:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(T)he early budget look was also a strategic move by Mayor Chuck Reed to shore up support for his controversial pension reform proposals — which he says are critical in preventing San Jose from sliding into “service-level insolvency.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>So I asked longtime San Jose political reporter Janice Rombeck, editor and publisher of KQED News Associate \u003ca href=\"http://www.neighborwebsjdev.com/\">\u003cstrong>NeighborWebSJ\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>, just how seriously she was taking the dire predictions of severe cuts for fiscal year 2012-13 that are even more dire than those already enacted.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Very seriously, it turns out… \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s an edited transcript of my interview with her:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What happened at the City Council meeting Tuesday?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The city budget director painted three pretty grim scenarios. The first was if no new revenue comes in and if the fiscal reforms that Mayor Chuck Reed has proposed don’t get enacted. This is what the city is facing under that scenario: all libraries closed, all community centers closed or leased out to private directors, more police officers cut, no improvement done to city streets, maintenance and parks outsourced or just not done.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>City Manager Deb Figone said “this is no way to run a city of a million people.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">There was a push to sound the alarm and let people know this is for real, this is not political posturing.\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>Is this just political posturing or do these numbers really add up? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I think the numbers are real.This is much earlier than they usually start on budget projections. I think it’s because the outlook is grim, but also because they want support for these fiscal reforms, including the reduction of pension costs, the main expense that is driving these deficits. And they want to go to the ballot box probably not in June but maybe November 2012, to get a city charter change so that they can reduce pension benefits.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>If they get these pension reforms, the draconian cuts need not take place? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There probably will still be cuts in the short term because some of these cost savings won’t be realized until later on, but it won’t be as dramatic as portrayed in scenario 1. But the city is still facing cuts beyond what we’ve had here before.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What is the status of Reed’s pension reform plan? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">The city has run out of options.\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>Most of it still needs to be negotiated with the 11 unions that make up city employees. That will be the difficult part. The ballot measure will allow the city to impose reductions in benefits if it can’t be negotiated.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The city cut benefits and salaries of city employees by 10% last year, to help close the deficit in the current budget. But the Police Officers Association has filed a complaint. They want the cut to be for just one year; the city wants the cuts to be ongoing. That’s in arbitration right now, and it could be devastating to the budget if the arbitrator comes back and says the city can’t impose it again next year.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How does the public feel about pension reform?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The public is supportive of pension reform. But there was a lot of discussion at the council meeting about the public not understanding the reality of what the city is facing, and among some of the councilmembers there was a push to sound the alarm and let people know this is for real, this is not political posturing.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There has been pushback from some parts of the community who say the numbers are wrong, the actuarials are wrong, and the pension estimates and the costs are wrong. Independent auditors and insurance experts have said that’s not true, these costs are going to escalate.\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">\n\u003cp>It used to be journalists were kind of skeptical about early projections…That’s not the case anymore.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>The city has run out of options. They don’t’ feel they can cut any more employees and continue to run the government and city services. They are going to try to increase the sales tax; they just passed a medicinal marijuana ordinance that will bring in additional revenue, maybe a couple of million dollars. They’re looking under every nook and cranny. But it’s just not popular to raise taxes in a recessionary economy in which people are hurting and out of work.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Part of the other result of this is that residents are going to have to do a lot more that they have been relying on the city to do. Graffiti removal is one — the city relies on volunteers to do that. It’s not going to be business as usual in San Jose.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It used to be that journalists were kind of skeptical about early projections. There always seemed to be a little bit of crying wolf. Then when budget time came around they’d come up with the money. But I don’t see that; that’s not the case anymore. These are real numbers and real tough decisions that are going to have to be made.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve already seen it in this current budget: the anti-gang task force, the \u003ca href=\"http://www.strongneighborhoods.org/\">Strong Neighborhoods\u003c/a> initiative, anti-graffiti and anti-litter programs that are nationally known and have been held up as models for providing city services have been decimated or at least drastically cut. There are no sacred cows, there are no easy ways to balance this budge anymore.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>You can \u003ca href=\"http://sanjose.granicus.com/MediaPlayer.php?view_id=2&clip_id=5314\">watch an archive of Tuesday’s City Council meeting\u003c/a> at the San Jose web site.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>Update Sep 27\u003c/em> Janice Krombeck received this email from Mayor Reed’s office today:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(We) want to point out…that the Mayor, and many of his colleagues on the Council, are currently targeting a March 2012 special election for\u003cbr>\nfiscal reforms (not June or November). If we get voter approval in March, we’ll have just enough time to implement the pension changes in time to achieve savings in FY 12-13. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve been trying to do our best to make sure the media (and through them, our employees and the public) are aware of the timeline we’re working on. Esp. since the whole reason for doing this is to try\u003cbr>\nand get the savings needed to avoid those devastating impacts next June.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/40879/just-how-bad-is-san-joses-budget-situation-really",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8"
],
"tags": [
"news_728",
"news_152",
"news_118",
"news_17968",
"news_18541"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_37109": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_37109",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "37109",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1313446168000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "coalition-calls-for-californians-to-boycott-amazon-over-sales-tax-issue",
"title": "Coalition Calls for Californians to Boycott Amazon Over Sales Tax Issue; Loni Hancock Statement",
"publishDate": 1313446168,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Coalition Calls for Californians to Boycott Amazon Over Sales Tax Issue; Loni Hancock Statement | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>In what could be a test of your principles versus your ability to buy Season Four of “Mad Men” at a really low price, a coalition of anti-poverty groups is \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/08/amazon-boycott-urged-advocates-for-poor.html\">calling for Californians to boycott\u003c/a> Amazon.com over the \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/online-sales-tax/\">online sales tax\u003c/a> issue. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s the group’s web site, \u003ca href=\"http://thinkbeforeyouclickca.org/\">\u003cstrong>ThinkBeforeYouClickCA.org\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>, which includes a \u003ca href=\"http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/thinkb4uclick/\">petition letter\u003c/a> to Amazon that ends with:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“If Amazon.com is unwilling to abide by the same laws as everyone else and contribute to the collective well-being of our state, then I have no choice but to close my account and end my contributions to Amazon.com.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As a reason for the boycott, the group cites Amazon’s \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/06/30/amazon-says-it-wont-collect-sales-tax/\">non-compliance\u003c/a> with the new \u003ca href=\"http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/abx1_28_bill_20110629_chaptered.html\">law\u003c/a> mandating that out-of-state online retailers collect sales tax on merchandise they sell. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Such transactions have previously been exempt because of a \u003ca href=\"http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/91-0194.ZO.html\"> Supreme Court decision\u003c/a> ruling that states cannot require companies without a physical presence in-state to collect sales tax, even if the company conducts business in that state. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>California tried to circumvent that prohibition by expanding the definition of what constitutes an in-state presence. The new law stipulates that a presence is established if sellers own a subsidiary in the state, or by a relationship with “affiliates,” web sites that refer buyers to the retailer’s site. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Amazon immediately responded to the law by severing ties with its California affiliates. Then, a couple of weeks later, it \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/capitalnotes/2011/07/11/amazon-tax-referendum-filed/\">filed a formal request for a referendum\u003c/a> to overturn the law. The company needs to submit about 504,000 signatures by mid-October in order for it to qualify.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Amazon has said it will not collect the sales tax because it’s unconstitutional, among other reasons. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>KQED’s Joshua Johnson today talked to East Bay State Sen. Loni Hancock, who co-authored the bill and is supporting the boycott. Here’s what she had to say; an edited transcript follows the audio clip.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/amazonboycotthancock.mp3\">State Sen. Loni Hancock calls for Californians to boycott Amazon.com\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/amazonboycotthancock1.mp3|titles=amazonboycotthancock]\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The legislation passed this spring is incredibly important. It creates a level playing field for California-based businesses because it requires out-of -state online retailers to collect and pay the same sales tax that all our local companies and communities do. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Right now there are a lot of angry Californians because Amazon, a multi-billion dollar corporation, refuses to comply with the law and is trying to take advantage of California’s initiative and referendum process to repeal the bill that was just passed and signed by the governor at a time when we need to have our local businesses survive and thrive and not be undercut by big out of state corporations, and at a time when the state needs all the revenue that is owed us because we’re talking about children’s education, our libraries, our parks, our roads, the things that the sales tax is used to buy for Californians. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A large coalition of people has come together just as they did around the attempt by Texas oil companies to repeal California’s clean air laws last year, and are saying just say no to this….\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Maybe so. But a \u003ca href=\"http://dornsife.usc.edu/usc-lat-poll-online-sales-tax-july-2011/\">poll\u003c/a> conducted last month found support for the tax of 46%, with 49% opposing it. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have a request out to Amazon now for comment. \u003c/p>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1727903324,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 17,
"wordCount": 593
},
"headData": {
"title": "Coalition Calls for Californians to Boycott Amazon Over Sales Tax Issue; Loni Hancock Statement | KQED",
"description": "In what could be a test of your principles versus your ability to buy Season Four of "Mad Men" at a really low price, a coalition of anti-poverty groups is calling for Californians to boycott Amazon.com over the online sales tax issue. Here's the group's web site, ThinkBeforeYouClickCA.org, which includes a petition letter to Amazon that ends with: "If Amazon.com is unwilling to abide by the same laws as everyone else and contribute to the collective well-being of our state, then I have no choice but to close my account and end my contributions to Amazon.com." As a reason for",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Coalition Calls for Californians to Boycott Amazon Over Sales Tax Issue; Loni Hancock Statement",
"datePublished": "2011-08-15T15:09:28-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-10-02T14:08:44-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/37109/coalition-calls-for-californians-to-boycott-amazon-over-sales-tax-issue",
"audioUrl": "http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/amazonboycotthancock.mp3",
"audioDuration": null,
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>In what could be a test of your principles versus your ability to buy Season Four of “Mad Men” at a really low price, a coalition of anti-poverty groups is \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.sacbee.com/capitolalertlatest/2011/08/amazon-boycott-urged-advocates-for-poor.html\">calling for Californians to boycott\u003c/a> Amazon.com over the \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/online-sales-tax/\">online sales tax\u003c/a> issue. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s the group’s web site, \u003ca href=\"http://thinkbeforeyouclickca.org/\">\u003cstrong>ThinkBeforeYouClickCA.org\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>, which includes a \u003ca href=\"http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/thinkb4uclick/\">petition letter\u003c/a> to Amazon that ends with:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“If Amazon.com is unwilling to abide by the same laws as everyone else and contribute to the collective well-being of our state, then I have no choice but to close my account and end my contributions to Amazon.com.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As a reason for the boycott, the group cites Amazon’s \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/06/30/amazon-says-it-wont-collect-sales-tax/\">non-compliance\u003c/a> with the new \u003ca href=\"http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/abx1_28_bill_20110629_chaptered.html\">law\u003c/a> mandating that out-of-state online retailers collect sales tax on merchandise they sell. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Such transactions have previously been exempt because of a \u003ca href=\"http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/91-0194.ZO.html\"> Supreme Court decision\u003c/a> ruling that states cannot require companies without a physical presence in-state to collect sales tax, even if the company conducts business in that state. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>California tried to circumvent that prohibition by expanding the definition of what constitutes an in-state presence. The new law stipulates that a presence is established if sellers own a subsidiary in the state, or by a relationship with “affiliates,” web sites that refer buyers to the retailer’s site. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Amazon immediately responded to the law by severing ties with its California affiliates. Then, a couple of weeks later, it \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/capitalnotes/2011/07/11/amazon-tax-referendum-filed/\">filed a formal request for a referendum\u003c/a> to overturn the law. The company needs to submit about 504,000 signatures by mid-October in order for it to qualify.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Amazon has said it will not collect the sales tax because it’s unconstitutional, among other reasons. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>KQED’s Joshua Johnson today talked to East Bay State Sen. Loni Hancock, who co-authored the bill and is supporting the boycott. Here’s what she had to say; an edited transcript follows the audio clip.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/amazonboycotthancock.mp3\">State Sen. Loni Hancock calls for Californians to boycott Amazon.com\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "audio",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": ":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/amazonboycotthancock1.mp3|titles=amazonboycotthancock"
},
"numeric": [
":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/08/amazonboycotthancock1.mp3|titles=amazonboycotthancock"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The legislation passed this spring is incredibly important. It creates a level playing field for California-based businesses because it requires out-of -state online retailers to collect and pay the same sales tax that all our local companies and communities do. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Right now there are a lot of angry Californians because Amazon, a multi-billion dollar corporation, refuses to comply with the law and is trying to take advantage of California’s initiative and referendum process to repeal the bill that was just passed and signed by the governor at a time when we need to have our local businesses survive and thrive and not be undercut by big out of state corporations, and at a time when the state needs all the revenue that is owed us because we’re talking about children’s education, our libraries, our parks, our roads, the things that the sales tax is used to buy for Californians. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A large coalition of people has come together just as they did around the attempt by Texas oil companies to repeal California’s clean air laws last year, and are saying just say no to this….\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Maybe so. But a \u003ca href=\"http://dornsife.usc.edu/usc-lat-poll-online-sales-tax-july-2011/\">poll\u003c/a> conducted last month found support for the tax of 46%, with 49% opposing it. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have a request out to Amazon now for comment. \u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/37109/coalition-calls-for-californians-to-boycott-amazon-over-sales-tax-issue",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_1758",
"news_248"
],
"tags": [
"news_1611",
"news_1612",
"news_17968",
"news_71",
"news_423"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_34678": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_34678",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "34678",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1311287687000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "debate-defense-of-marriage-act",
"title": "Debate on Repealing the Defense of Marriage Act",
"publishDate": 1311287687,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Debate on Repealing the Defense of Marriage Act | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>Yesterday on KQED Radio’s Forum, host Michael Krasny and guests debated the Respect for Marriage Act, a repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which legally defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, which has the effect of denying a range of benefits to same-sex married couples that are afforded to married people of the opposite sex. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s a \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/07/20/senate-judiciary-committee-on-repeal-of-defense-of-marriage-act/\">video replay\u003c/a> of Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill, which is being sponsored by Senator Dianne Feinstein, here. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Discussing the issue on Forum yesterday were Bill May, chairman of Catholics for the Common Good and an opponent of the Respect for Marriage Act, Jerrold Nadler, U.S. congressman (D NY) and co-sponsor of the bill, and Kate Kendell, executive director of the \u003ca href=\"http://www.nclrights.org/site/PageServer\">National Center for Lesbian Rights\u003c/a> and a bill proponent. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Listen to some of that show or read an edited transcript below:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/07/domadebate.mp3\">\u003cstrong>Debate on repealing the Defense of Marriage Act\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/07/domadebate.mp3|titles=domadebate]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\n\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>:\u003cbr>\nWhere marriage is concerned, and divorce and inheritance and adoptions, certainly those things have traditionally come under state law, so why keep a federal law like DOMA in place?\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Bill May, Catholics for the Common Good\u003c/strong>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>To reduce marriage to just a package of benefits demonstrates how shallow the understanding of what marriage really is. Marriage is an institution that unites a man and a woman with each other and any children born from the union. It’s the only institution that does that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The government is saying and in fact it’s a stated policy of the Obama administration that the government has no interest in uniting a man and a woman with each other and any children born from their union. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>What’s happening here is not creating a new entity called same-sex marriage but redefining the reality of marriage to simply a public recognition of a committed relationship between adults for their private interests, for benefits. And that’s just a response to a very very powerful public interest and ignores the common interest that every child has in the marriage of his or her mother and father.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nWell if it’s just benefits, they also affect real people in a very profound way, I’m sure you would concede. You’ve got people who have been together for decades and suddenly they don’t have the benefits that are afforded to other couples for that period. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Bill May\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nWell everyone has benefits that affect them in a personal way and some people qualify for benefits and other people don’t. This isn’t about benefits, it’s about the institution that unites a man and a woman with each other and any children born from their union. Do we stand with the powerful interests that want to redefine that to just the private interest for adults or to the common interest that every child has in that institution? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kate Kendell, National Center for Lesbian Rights and a proponent of the \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There’s nothing about expanding equality and fairness and justice to include people who have been traditionally excluded that works a redefinition to the institution of marriage. It is about making this country more fair, more just, more egalitarian, affording to same-sex relationships the same dignity, the same security, that we do every other married couple. It’s an expansion of a greater ideal that we include more people to be covered by the protections and the security and the dignity and the nomenclature and the common humanity that comes with couples who are married by affording that same recognition. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I would agree with Bill on one point: It is about much more than benefits. We’re talking about a system and an understanding and an institution that everybody has deep feelings for and experience with. Marriage, when people choose to make that decision, is not about benefits. It is about love and commitment and shared sacrifice. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And what I appreciate seeing in the whole discourse around marriage and the rights of same-sex couples, is that we are finally understanding – and the polls show this month after month, year after year – that we are three-dimensions as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, we’re not just in the streets marching, we’re not just on talk shows advocating for our rights. We have the same yearning for love and joy and commitment and dignity in our relationship as anyone else. And to have us alone to not have the rights that are accorded to couples who are married is unconscionable in a country that says our constitution protects everyone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny, host \u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nBill May, as a good Catholic, what do you think when you hear this is about justice and love and things of that sort? It doesn’t sound like rhetoric, it sounds like authentic, sincere sentiments. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Bill May\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nWell of course it is. Everyone is made for love. We crave it, we need it. Everybody can love. It’s not about that. While everybody is made for love, not everybody is made for marriage that unites a man and a woman and any children that are born from their union. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s not true that this isn’t redefining marriage. All Kate has to do is to go to Judge Walker’s decision that overturned Prop 8 in California that shows he created a whole new definition of marriage and treated it as a private interest for the benefits of adults in order to come to his conclusion. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>That’s not what marriage is. Marriage unites a man and a woman and any children that are born from their union. \u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102595,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 23,
"wordCount": 989
},
"headData": {
"title": "Debate on Repealing the Defense of Marriage Act | KQED",
"description": "Yesterday on KQED Radio’s Forum, host Michael Krasny and guests debated the Respect for Marriage Act, a repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which legally defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, which has the effect of denying a range of benefits to same-sex married couples that are afforded",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Debate on Repealing the Defense of Marriage Act",
"datePublished": "2011-07-21T15:34:47-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:03:15-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/34678/debate-defense-of-marriage-act",
"audioUrl": "http://ww2.kqed.org/news/files/2011/07/domadebate.mp3",
"audioDuration": null,
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>Yesterday on KQED Radio’s Forum, host Michael Krasny and guests debated the Respect for Marriage Act, a repeal of the federal Defense of Marriage Act, which legally defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman, which has the effect of denying a range of benefits to same-sex married couples that are afforded to married people of the opposite sex. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s a \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/07/20/senate-judiciary-committee-on-repeal-of-defense-of-marriage-act/\">video replay\u003c/a> of Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on the bill, which is being sponsored by Senator Dianne Feinstein, here. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Discussing the issue on Forum yesterday were Bill May, chairman of Catholics for the Common Good and an opponent of the Respect for Marriage Act, Jerrold Nadler, U.S. congressman (D NY) and co-sponsor of the bill, and Kate Kendell, executive director of the \u003ca href=\"http://www.nclrights.org/site/PageServer\">National Center for Lesbian Rights\u003c/a> and a bill proponent. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Listen to some of that show or read an edited transcript below:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/07/domadebate.mp3\">\u003cstrong>Debate on repealing the Defense of Marriage Act\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "audio",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": ":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/07/domadebate.mp3|titles=domadebate"
},
"numeric": [
":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/07/domadebate.mp3|titles=domadebate"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\n\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>:\u003cbr>\nWhere marriage is concerned, and divorce and inheritance and adoptions, certainly those things have traditionally come under state law, so why keep a federal law like DOMA in place?\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Bill May, Catholics for the Common Good\u003c/strong>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>To reduce marriage to just a package of benefits demonstrates how shallow the understanding of what marriage really is. Marriage is an institution that unites a man and a woman with each other and any children born from the union. It’s the only institution that does that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The government is saying and in fact it’s a stated policy of the Obama administration that the government has no interest in uniting a man and a woman with each other and any children born from their union. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>What’s happening here is not creating a new entity called same-sex marriage but redefining the reality of marriage to simply a public recognition of a committed relationship between adults for their private interests, for benefits. And that’s just a response to a very very powerful public interest and ignores the common interest that every child has in the marriage of his or her mother and father.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nWell if it’s just benefits, they also affect real people in a very profound way, I’m sure you would concede. You’ve got people who have been together for decades and suddenly they don’t have the benefits that are afforded to other couples for that period. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Bill May\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nWell everyone has benefits that affect them in a personal way and some people qualify for benefits and other people don’t. This isn’t about benefits, it’s about the institution that unites a man and a woman with each other and any children born from their union. Do we stand with the powerful interests that want to redefine that to just the private interest for adults or to the common interest that every child has in that institution? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kate Kendell, National Center for Lesbian Rights and a proponent of the \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There’s nothing about expanding equality and fairness and justice to include people who have been traditionally excluded that works a redefinition to the institution of marriage. It is about making this country more fair, more just, more egalitarian, affording to same-sex relationships the same dignity, the same security, that we do every other married couple. It’s an expansion of a greater ideal that we include more people to be covered by the protections and the security and the dignity and the nomenclature and the common humanity that comes with couples who are married by affording that same recognition. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I would agree with Bill on one point: It is about much more than benefits. We’re talking about a system and an understanding and an institution that everybody has deep feelings for and experience with. Marriage, when people choose to make that decision, is not about benefits. It is about love and commitment and shared sacrifice. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And what I appreciate seeing in the whole discourse around marriage and the rights of same-sex couples, is that we are finally understanding – and the polls show this month after month, year after year – that we are three-dimensions as lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender people, we’re not just in the streets marching, we’re not just on talk shows advocating for our rights. We have the same yearning for love and joy and commitment and dignity in our relationship as anyone else. And to have us alone to not have the rights that are accorded to couples who are married is unconscionable in a country that says our constitution protects everyone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny, host \u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nBill May, as a good Catholic, what do you think when you hear this is about justice and love and things of that sort? It doesn’t sound like rhetoric, it sounds like authentic, sincere sentiments. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Bill May\u003c/strong>\u003cbr>\nWell of course it is. Everyone is made for love. We crave it, we need it. Everybody can love. It’s not about that. While everybody is made for love, not everybody is made for marriage that unites a man and a woman and any children that are born from their union. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s not true that this isn’t redefining marriage. All Kate has to do is to go to Judge Walker’s decision that overturned Prop 8 in California that shows he created a whole new definition of marriage and treated it as a private interest for the benefits of adults in order to come to his conclusion. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>That’s not what marriage is. Marriage unites a man and a woman and any children that are born from their union. \u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/34678/debate-defense-of-marriage-act",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_6188"
],
"tags": [
"news_893",
"news_274",
"news_15",
"news_82",
"news_17968"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_33319": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_33319",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "33319",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1310060955000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "death-penalty-abolition-bill",
"title": "Public Safety Committee Hearing on Abolishing Death Penalty",
"publishDate": 1310060955,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Public Safety Committee Hearing on Abolishing Death Penalty | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>The California Assembly Public Safety Committee is holding a hearing on SB 490, East Bay State Senator Loni Hancock’s bill to \u003ca href=\"http://www.calchannel.com/channel/live/3\">abolish the death penalty\u003c/a> in California. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cdel datetime=\"2011-07-07T19:54:21+00:00\">\u003c/del>\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align: center\"> \u003ca href=\"http://www.calchannel.com/channel/live/3\">\u003cstrong>WATCH LIVE HERE\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>\u003c/div>\n\u003cp> (\u003cem>Update 12:55\u003c/em> p.m. The hearing is over. The California Channel provides an \u003ca href=\"http://www.calchannel.com/channel/viewvideo/2833\">archive here\u003c/a>.)\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You can \u003ca href=\"http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0451-0500/sb_490_bill_20110628_amended_asm_v95.html\">read the bill here\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Many of the \u003ca href=\"http://www.contracostatimes.com/bay-area-news/ci_18347434?nclick_check=1\">arguments\u003c/a> currently being made against the death penalty have to do with cost. A recent study by U.S. 9th Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon and Loyola Law School professor Paula M. Mitchell found the state has \u003ca href=\"http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/20/local/la-me-adv-death-penalty-costs-20110620\">spent more than $4 billion\u003c/a> on capital punishment since it was reinstated in 1978. Seven hundred and fourteen prisoners currently reside on death row, but just thirteen have been executed since reinstatement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_18412443\">Death penalty abolition bill has first hearing Thursday\u003c/a> (Oakland Tribune)\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102541,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 8,
"wordCount": 138
},
"headData": {
"title": "Public Safety Committee Hearing on Abolishing Death Penalty | KQED",
"description": "The California Assembly Public Safety Committee is holding a hearing on SB 490, East Bay State Senator Loni Hancock’s bill to abolish the death penalty in California. WATCH LIVE HERE (Update 12:55 p.m. The hearing is over. The California Channel provides an archive here.) You can read the bill here. Many of the arguments currently",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Public Safety Committee Hearing on Abolishing Death Penalty",
"datePublished": "2011-07-07T10:49:15-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:02:21-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/33319/death-penalty-abolition-bill",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>The California Assembly Public Safety Committee is holding a hearing on SB 490, East Bay State Senator Loni Hancock’s bill to \u003ca href=\"http://www.calchannel.com/channel/live/3\">abolish the death penalty\u003c/a> in California. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cdel datetime=\"2011-07-07T19:54:21+00:00\">\u003c/del>\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align: center\"> \u003ca href=\"http://www.calchannel.com/channel/live/3\">\u003cstrong>WATCH LIVE HERE\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>\u003c/div>\n\u003cp> (\u003cem>Update 12:55\u003c/em> p.m. The hearing is over. The California Channel provides an \u003ca href=\"http://www.calchannel.com/channel/viewvideo/2833\">archive here\u003c/a>.)\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You can \u003ca href=\"http://info.sen.ca.gov/pub/11-12/bill/sen/sb_0451-0500/sb_490_bill_20110628_amended_asm_v95.html\">read the bill here\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Many of the \u003ca href=\"http://www.contracostatimes.com/bay-area-news/ci_18347434?nclick_check=1\">arguments\u003c/a> currently being made against the death penalty have to do with cost. A recent study by U.S. 9th Circuit Judge Arthur L. Alarcon and Loyola Law School professor Paula M. Mitchell found the state has \u003ca href=\"http://articles.latimes.com/2011/jun/20/local/la-me-adv-death-penalty-costs-20110620\">spent more than $4 billion\u003c/a> on capital punishment since it was reinstated in 1978. Seven hundred and fourteen prisoners currently reside on death row, but just thirteen have been executed since reinstatement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_18412443\">Death penalty abolition bill has first hearing Thursday\u003c/a> (Oakland Tribune)\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/33319/death-penalty-abolition-bill",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_6188"
],
"tags": [
"news_152",
"news_17968",
"news_1658"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_31875": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_31875",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "31875",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1308777421000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "interview-robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-nuclear-energy-brightsource-solar-project",
"title": "Interview: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 'Uninsurable' Nuke Energy Industry, BrightSource Solar Project",
"publishDate": 1308777421,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Interview: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on ‘Uninsurable’ Nuke Energy Industry, BrightSource Solar Project | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_31904\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 240px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKjrSM.jpg\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKjrSM.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"RFKjrSM\" width=\"240\" height=\"160\" class=\"size-full wp-image-31904\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 2007. (Photo: Daniel Schwen)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>Last week, KQED \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/\">Climate Watch\u003c/a>‘s Gretchen Weber did a phone interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Kennedy had just appeared on KQED’s \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201106150931\">Forum radio program\u003c/a> to talk about \u003ca href=\"http://thelastmountainmovie.com/\">The Last Mountain\u003c/a>, a documentary about the effects of coal mining in Appalachia. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Weber asked Kennedy about the viability of nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuels, an issue in the news today with the release of a Field Poll showing \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/22/californians-no-thanks-to-new-nukes/\">diminished support\u003c/a> among Californians for building more nuclear plants in the state.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Listen to the RFK, Jr. interview below; an edited transcript appears below the audio clip. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca>\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKNuke.mp3\">\u003cem>Robert F. Kennedy, Jr on the nuclear industry\u003c/em>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKNuke.mp3|titles=RFKNuke]\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>What about nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuels?\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I believe in free markets and I’ve always said to the nuclear industry that I’m all in favor of it if they can make it economical and they can make it safe. The typical nuclear power plant costs about $11-14 billion per gigawatt. Well (solar energy company) BrightSource is \u003ca href=\"http://ivanpahsolar.com/\">building its plant\u003c/a> at a little over $3 billion a gigawatt, so its close to one-fifth the cost. \u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">It’s not a bunch of hippies in tie-dye teeshirts who are saying nuclear power is unsafe. It’s the insurance industry and Wall Street, guys in black ties and suits, and they’re saying, ‘you’re too risky to insure.’\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>In addition, no utility in this country will build a nuclear plant unless 100 percent of the construction costs are paid by the U.S. taxpayer and then 100 percent of the disposal costs, which is an enterprise that is going to require 30,000 years, five times the length of recorded human history. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Well they can’t get an insurance policy, so they had to go to congress with a sleazy legislative maneuver in the middle of the night and pass the \u003ca href=\"http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=ww#sclient=psy&hl=en&site=webhp&source=hp&q=price-anderson+nuclear&aq=f&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=905e9081899b75b1&biw=1016&bih=500\">Price Anderson Act\u003c/a>, which shifts the risk of their activities to the American public. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No other industry has that advantage in the marketplace. So it’s not a bunch of hippies in tie-dye teeshirts who are saying nuclear power is unsafe. It’s the insurance industry and Wall Street, guys in black ties and suits, and they’re saying, ‘you’re too risky to insure.’ In a free market capitalist society the insurance industry is the final arbiter of risk, and they’re the ones saying the nuclear industry is unsafe. The first thing I say to the nuclear industry is, “if you’re really safe, then get an insurance policy just like everybody else does. Don’t’ tell us you’re safe and then say, “oh but if we make a mistake we’re not going to pay for it.”\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Kennedy also spoke about the controversy over the Ivanpah solar farm, a large solar energy project in the Mojave Desert by Oakland-based BrightSource Energy. A sort of internecine environmental battle erupted when the planned 370-megawatt generating system came under fire from preservation groups concerned about loss of habitat for desert tortoises. The project was halted by federal officials in April but recently \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.forbes.com/toddwoody/2011/06/14/feds-find-brightsource-solar-project-will-not-jeopardize-desert-tortoise/\">allowed to resume\u003c/a>. It should be noted that Kennedy is on the board of a green venture capital fund that is a large investor in BrightSource. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Listen to the interview below; an edited transcript follows.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKBrightSource.mp3\">\u003cem>Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on BrightSource solar project\u003c/em>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n[audio:http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKBrightSource.mp3|titles=RFKBrightSource]\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>What are your thoughts on the battle between environmentalists over BrightSource, in which you have a renewable energy project versus concerns over habitat destruction?\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Any time you have large-scale energy development, you’re going to have some kind of environmental footprint. The footprint on that project is as small as you can possibly get.\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">If we want to be able to get rid of coal, which is the biggest ill, we’ve got to replace it with something, and anything you replace it with is going to have some minimal environmental impact. \u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>I just spent time in the Appalachians seeing what the alternatives are. Over the past 10 years, we’ve blown up part of the Appalachian mountains, the richest ecosystem in the entire hemisphere, the only ecosystem that survived the ice age. There’s more biological abundance per cubic meter there — the average forest in North America has three dominant tree species, Appalachia has 80. In ten years, we’ve already destroyed an area in Appalachia larger than the state of Delaware. Cut down entire mountain ranges, the 500 biggest mountains in the state. We’ve buried 2500 miles of the richest waterways in the world.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So I look at alternatives; wind has impacts. Solar has impacts. I think the least impactful form of energy is the kind of approach that BrightSource is taking. I don’t think you’ll get utility-scale energy production with less of an environmental footprint than will be created by BrightSource.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If we want an energy system in this country, if we want to be able to get rid of coal, which is the biggest ill, we’ve got to replace it with something, and anything you replace it with is going to have some minimal environmental impact. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Our object should be to have a rational system that uses systems that reduce economic environmental costs most effectively. I don’t know of a project that’s going to generate energy at utility scales with imposing fewer environmental costs than BrightSource, and I would challenge anybody to point me to one.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102435,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 22,
"wordCount": 1001
},
"headData": {
"title": "Interview: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 'Uninsurable' Nuke Energy Industry, BrightSource Solar Project | KQED",
"description": "Last week, KQED Climate Watch‘s Gretchen Weber did a phone interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Kennedy had just appeared on KQED’s Forum radio program to talk about The Last Mountain, a documentary about the effects of coal mining in Appalachia. Weber asked Kennedy about the",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Interview: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on 'Uninsurable' Nuke Energy Industry, BrightSource Solar Project",
"datePublished": "2011-06-22T14:17:01-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:00:35-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/31875/interview-robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-nuclear-energy-brightsource-solar-project",
"audioUrl": "http://ww2.kqed.org/news/files/2011/06/RFKNuke.mp3",
"audioDuration": null,
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_31904\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 240px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKjrSM.jpg\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKjrSM.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"RFKjrSM\" width=\"240\" height=\"160\" class=\"size-full wp-image-31904\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Robert F. Kennedy Jr., 2007. (Photo: Daniel Schwen)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>Last week, KQED \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/\">Climate Watch\u003c/a>‘s Gretchen Weber did a phone interview with Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., a senior attorney for the Natural Resources Defense Council. Kennedy had just appeared on KQED’s \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201106150931\">Forum radio program\u003c/a> to talk about \u003ca href=\"http://thelastmountainmovie.com/\">The Last Mountain\u003c/a>, a documentary about the effects of coal mining in Appalachia. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Weber asked Kennedy about the viability of nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuels, an issue in the news today with the release of a Field Poll showing \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/climatewatch/2011/06/22/californians-no-thanks-to-new-nukes/\">diminished support\u003c/a> among Californians for building more nuclear plants in the state.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Listen to the RFK, Jr. interview below; an edited transcript appears below the audio clip. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca>\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKNuke.mp3\">\u003cem>Robert F. Kennedy, Jr on the nuclear industry\u003c/em>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "audio",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": ":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKNuke.mp3|titles=RFKNuke"
},
"numeric": [
":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKNuke.mp3|titles=RFKNuke"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>What about nuclear power as an alternative to fossil fuels?\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I believe in free markets and I’ve always said to the nuclear industry that I’m all in favor of it if they can make it economical and they can make it safe. The typical nuclear power plant costs about $11-14 billion per gigawatt. Well (solar energy company) BrightSource is \u003ca href=\"http://ivanpahsolar.com/\">building its plant\u003c/a> at a little over $3 billion a gigawatt, so its close to one-fifth the cost. \u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">It’s not a bunch of hippies in tie-dye teeshirts who are saying nuclear power is unsafe. It’s the insurance industry and Wall Street, guys in black ties and suits, and they’re saying, ‘you’re too risky to insure.’\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>In addition, no utility in this country will build a nuclear plant unless 100 percent of the construction costs are paid by the U.S. taxpayer and then 100 percent of the disposal costs, which is an enterprise that is going to require 30,000 years, five times the length of recorded human history. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Well they can’t get an insurance policy, so they had to go to congress with a sleazy legislative maneuver in the middle of the night and pass the \u003ca href=\"http://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en&tab=ww#sclient=psy&hl=en&site=webhp&source=hp&q=price-anderson+nuclear&aq=f&aqi=g2&aql=&oq=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.&fp=905e9081899b75b1&biw=1016&bih=500\">Price Anderson Act\u003c/a>, which shifts the risk of their activities to the American public. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No other industry has that advantage in the marketplace. So it’s not a bunch of hippies in tie-dye teeshirts who are saying nuclear power is unsafe. It’s the insurance industry and Wall Street, guys in black ties and suits, and they’re saying, ‘you’re too risky to insure.’ In a free market capitalist society the insurance industry is the final arbiter of risk, and they’re the ones saying the nuclear industry is unsafe. The first thing I say to the nuclear industry is, “if you’re really safe, then get an insurance policy just like everybody else does. Don’t’ tell us you’re safe and then say, “oh but if we make a mistake we’re not going to pay for it.”\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Kennedy also spoke about the controversy over the Ivanpah solar farm, a large solar energy project in the Mojave Desert by Oakland-based BrightSource Energy. A sort of internecine environmental battle erupted when the planned 370-megawatt generating system came under fire from preservation groups concerned about loss of habitat for desert tortoises. The project was halted by federal officials in April but recently \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.forbes.com/toddwoody/2011/06/14/feds-find-brightsource-solar-project-will-not-jeopardize-desert-tortoise/\">allowed to resume\u003c/a>. It should be noted that Kennedy is on the board of a green venture capital fund that is a large investor in BrightSource. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Listen to the interview below; an edited transcript follows.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKBrightSource.mp3\">\u003cem>Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. on BrightSource solar project\u003c/em>\u003c/a>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "audio",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": ":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKBrightSource.mp3|titles=RFKBrightSource"
},
"numeric": [
":http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/RFKBrightSource.mp3|titles=RFKBrightSource"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>What are your thoughts on the battle between environmentalists over BrightSource, in which you have a renewable energy project versus concerns over habitat destruction?\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Any time you have large-scale energy development, you’re going to have some kind of environmental footprint. The footprint on that project is as small as you can possibly get.\u003c/p>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">If we want to be able to get rid of coal, which is the biggest ill, we’ve got to replace it with something, and anything you replace it with is going to have some minimal environmental impact. \u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>I just spent time in the Appalachians seeing what the alternatives are. Over the past 10 years, we’ve blown up part of the Appalachian mountains, the richest ecosystem in the entire hemisphere, the only ecosystem that survived the ice age. There’s more biological abundance per cubic meter there — the average forest in North America has three dominant tree species, Appalachia has 80. In ten years, we’ve already destroyed an area in Appalachia larger than the state of Delaware. Cut down entire mountain ranges, the 500 biggest mountains in the state. We’ve buried 2500 miles of the richest waterways in the world.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So I look at alternatives; wind has impacts. Solar has impacts. I think the least impactful form of energy is the kind of approach that BrightSource is taking. I don’t think you’ll get utility-scale energy production with less of an environmental footprint than will be created by BrightSource.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If we want an energy system in this country, if we want to be able to get rid of coal, which is the biggest ill, we’ve got to replace it with something, and anything you replace it with is going to have some minimal environmental impact. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Our object should be to have a rational system that uses systems that reduce economic environmental costs most effectively. I don’t know of a project that’s going to generate energy at utility scales with imposing fewer environmental costs than BrightSource, and I would challenge anybody to point me to one.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/31875/interview-robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-nuclear-energy-brightsource-solar-project",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_1758",
"news_19906"
],
"tags": [
"news_17968",
"news_394"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_31272": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_31272",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "31272",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1308332806000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "jerry-brown-veto-the-day-after-op-eds-from-around-the-state",
"title": "Jerry Brown Veto: The Day After; Op-Eds From Around the State",
"publishDate": 1308332806,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Jerry Brown Veto: The Day After; Op-Eds From Around the State | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_31310\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 237px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/jerrybrownSOSaddress4.jpg\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/jerrybrownSOSaddress4.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"jerrybrownSOSaddress\" width=\"237\" height=\"156\" class=\"size-full wp-image-31310\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">He did it. He really did it.\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>KQED’s John Myers \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/capitalnotes/2011/06/16/brown-blocks-dems-budget-shot/\">boils down\u003c/a> the political calculus behind yesterday’s Jerry Brown \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/06/16/report-brown-to-veto-budget/\">\u003cstrong>veto of the budget\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> sent to him by his own party:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The budget ratified Wednesday, largely on a party-line vote, placed the veteran pol in a sticky wicket: veto it and ruffle some feathers, or sign it and trigger a chorus of “Brown broke his promise about gimmicks” comments by pundits and potshot takers alike.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>At first, few seemed to think he’d do it. In fact, in records dating back to 1901, no one has found a gubernatorial budget veto (although others have been threatened, as recently as the summer of 2008). But Jerry Brown has made a career out of defying conventional wisdom. And given his passionate rebuke of budget gimmicks during the 2010 campaign, the veto of the budget seems to at least make good on those promises.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The consensus opinion from newspapers around the state seems to be that Brown did the right thing. Some extracts:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_18290934\">Brown keeps trust with voters by vetoing sham budget\u003c/a> (San Jose Mercury News)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Gov. Jerry Brown kept his promise. He has said for months that he would refuse to sign a budget filled with gimmicks. That’s exactly what Democrats in the Legislature sent him Wednesday, and he quickly vetoed it, saying, “I don’t want to see more billions in borrowing, legal maneuvers that are questionable, and a budget that will not stand the test of time.” Can we get an “amen” to that? \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/17/3707359/dan-walters-if-california-legislators.html\">Dan Walters: If California legislators get paid, vetoed budget is giant charade\u003c/a> (Sacramento Bee)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Now isn’t this fun? The Legislature’s Democrats push a chewing-gum-and-baling-wire budget through in near-record time, claiming that it’s balanced and meets the rarely observed June 15 constitutional deadline for action. One day later, Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown rejects it as unbalanced and unworkable – after hinting three days before that he might sign such a budget… A complicating factor is that Steinberg, Pérez and public employee unions really don’t want the fall election that Brown seeks on taxes, fearing – with good reason – that voters would reject them. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Still another is the new state law that strips legislators of salaries and expense checks, about $400 per day each, if a budget is not passed by June 15. Controller John Chiang has appointed himself the law’s enforcer. Legislative leaders contend that Wednesday’s budget action complies, but Brown’s declaration that the budget was unbalanced gives Chiang grounds to stop the paychecks if he wishes. Chiang was waffling Thursday, saying he wants “to complete our analysis” before deciding whether to pay lawmakers at the end of the month. If Chiang pays legislators, the rejected budget will look like a giant charade by Democrats to evade the law.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-budget-20110617,0,1483301.story\">Budget veto: Brown’s stark choice\u003c/a> (LA Times)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>By vetoing the bills, Brown kept his campaign promise not to support budgetary shell games. He also presented lawmakers with a stark choice: either agree to his proposal to ask voters to extend some temporary tax increases, or make deeper cuts in schools, universities and public safety. Those areas weren’t hit as hard as safety net programs were when the Legislature approved more than $10 billion in cuts in March, but with a budget gap of about $10 billion remaining, those programs are the biggest targets.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Lawmakers have already cut general-fund spending to 2005 levels, and cutting billions more would take an unacceptable toll on vital state services. And California doesn’t have to go down that road — Republicans have said they’re willing to let the public vote on Brown’s tax proposal, which would maintain a temporary hike in sales and vehicle taxes for five years instead of allowing them to drop on July 1.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/06/17/ED921JUS1S.DTL\">Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget veto was the right move\u003c/a> (SF Chronicle)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>…The spending plan that Brown shot down invited a veto. It siphoned off tobacco tax money, stalled payments to schools and universities, and peddled state buildings for quick cash. For months, Brown has weighed in against this kind of trickery. The one saving grace: Democrats showed balky Republicans that a budget could be done without them. The shock value of a veto clearly raises the stakes.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/ci_18291614\">Brown was right to veto the sham budget\u003c/a> (Bay Area News Group)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The budget that was passed was an unworkable melange of unrealistic revenue projections, steeper spending cuts and of dubious legality concerning motor vehicle license “fees” and local sales taxes. But it doesn’t matter now that Brown has vetoed it, making moot threats by anti-tax groups to sue. Even before the governor acted, everyone in Sacramento understood that the budget was unworkable and was passed for the sole reason of preserving legislative pay and benefits. Now that the on-time budget charade has been played out, Brown and lawmakers in both parties still have to reach an agreement that preserves essential state services and does not overburden taxpayers and businesses during a tough economic period.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/jun/17/budget-vetoed-now-back-work/\">Budget vetoed, now back to work\u003c/a> (San Diego Union-Tribune)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>…This was not a budget worth celebrating. Instead, it was one more example of the disconnect between how the real world operates and how the Capitol does. A business – or a family, for that matter – that can never make ends meet and faces financial ruin doesn’t celebrate when it makes one more bad decision. A business, or at least one with stockholders, would face a civil investigation and investor lawsuits if it issued dishonest financial statements.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But in Sacramento, the adoption of another state spending plan built on accounting gimmicks, bogus revenue predictions and legally problematic tax hikes is a reason to party. This is why we welcome Gov. Jerry Brown’s quick decision to veto the budget. “We can – and must – do better,” Brown said. “A balanced budget is critical to our economic recovery.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/brown-304831-budget-taxes.html\">A good veto, probably for wrong reasons\u003c/a> (Orange County Register)\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Gov. Jerry Brown was right Thursday to veto a gimmick-laden, tax-increasing, unworkable state budget. But he probably did it for the wrong reason. We agree with the governor that the budget passed by the Democratic-controlled Legislature was not realistically balanced, as the law intends, and that it would have extended deficits for years, adding to the state’s already enormous debt burden… Mr. Brown wants what he has wanted all year. Only new taxes adding up to $50 billion over five years can solve the budget shortfalls and address California’s longer-term fiscal problems, the governor insists. He’s wrong. Consequently, Mr. Brown and we dramatically disagree on what should come next.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.pe.com/localnews/opinion/editorials/stories/PE_OpEd_Opinion_D_op_17_ed_budget.2f6fc41.html\">Budget nonsense\u003c/a> (Riverside Press-Enterprise)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The misguided mess of a budget legislators approved on Wednesday deserved the quick death it died on Thursday. The Legislature should now pass a serious spending plan instead. The state does not need more pointless political theater, but a Legislature willing to put state finances on a more sustainable footing.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>An on-time state budget is not the same as a realistic spending plan. Democrats in the Legislature pushed through a majority-vote budget on Wednesday that supposedly closed the remaining $9.6 billion deficit in the $89 billion spending plan for 2011-12. The quick passage was aimed to preserve legislators’ pay; Prop. 25 requires them to forfeit income if a budget bill has not emerged by June 15. \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.fresnobee.com/2011/06/16/2430299/editorial-controller-chiang-should.html\">Controller Chiang should cancel lawmakers’ pay\u003c/a> (Fresno Bee)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Now that Gov. Jerry Brown has vetoed the Democratic legislators’ flawed budget, Controller John Chiang can strike a blow for fiscal responsibility by withholding lawmakers’ pay. That’s what he should do…Democrats did approve a spending plan by that deadline. Democratic leaders say that action ought to be enough to ensure they continue to be paid. However, their plan seeks to close a $10 billion budget gap with a mix of cuts, accounting trickery, and legally questionable fee hikes and raids on other funds.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102406,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 22,
"wordCount": 1400
},
"headData": {
"title": "Jerry Brown Veto: The Day After; Op-Eds From Around the State | KQED",
"description": "KQED’s John Myers boils down the political calculus behind yesterday’s Jerry Brown veto of the budget sent to him by his own party: The budget ratified Wednesday, largely on a party-line vote, placed the veteran pol in a sticky wicket: veto it and ruffle some feathers, or sign it and trigger a chorus of “Brown",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Jerry Brown Veto: The Day After; Op-Eds From Around the State",
"datePublished": "2011-06-17T10:46:46-07:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:00:06-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/31272/jerry-brown-veto-the-day-after-op-eds-from-around-the-state",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_31310\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 237px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/jerrybrownSOSaddress4.jpg\">\u003cimg loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/06/jerrybrownSOSaddress4.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"jerrybrownSOSaddress\" width=\"237\" height=\"156\" class=\"size-full wp-image-31310\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">He did it. He really did it.\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>KQED’s John Myers \u003ca href=\"http://blogs.kqed.org/capitalnotes/2011/06/16/brown-blocks-dems-budget-shot/\">boils down\u003c/a> the political calculus behind yesterday’s Jerry Brown \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/06/16/report-brown-to-veto-budget/\">\u003cstrong>veto of the budget\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> sent to him by his own party:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The budget ratified Wednesday, largely on a party-line vote, placed the veteran pol in a sticky wicket: veto it and ruffle some feathers, or sign it and trigger a chorus of “Brown broke his promise about gimmicks” comments by pundits and potshot takers alike.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>At first, few seemed to think he’d do it. In fact, in records dating back to 1901, no one has found a gubernatorial budget veto (although others have been threatened, as recently as the summer of 2008). But Jerry Brown has made a career out of defying conventional wisdom. And given his passionate rebuke of budget gimmicks during the 2010 campaign, the veto of the budget seems to at least make good on those promises.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The consensus opinion from newspapers around the state seems to be that Brown did the right thing. Some extracts:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_18290934\">Brown keeps trust with voters by vetoing sham budget\u003c/a> (San Jose Mercury News)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Gov. Jerry Brown kept his promise. He has said for months that he would refuse to sign a budget filled with gimmicks. That’s exactly what Democrats in the Legislature sent him Wednesday, and he quickly vetoed it, saying, “I don’t want to see more billions in borrowing, legal maneuvers that are questionable, and a budget that will not stand the test of time.” Can we get an “amen” to that? \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/06/17/3707359/dan-walters-if-california-legislators.html\">Dan Walters: If California legislators get paid, vetoed budget is giant charade\u003c/a> (Sacramento Bee)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Now isn’t this fun? The Legislature’s Democrats push a chewing-gum-and-baling-wire budget through in near-record time, claiming that it’s balanced and meets the rarely observed June 15 constitutional deadline for action. One day later, Democratic Gov. Jerry Brown rejects it as unbalanced and unworkable – after hinting three days before that he might sign such a budget… A complicating factor is that Steinberg, Pérez and public employee unions really don’t want the fall election that Brown seeks on taxes, fearing – with good reason – that voters would reject them. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Still another is the new state law that strips legislators of salaries and expense checks, about $400 per day each, if a budget is not passed by June 15. Controller John Chiang has appointed himself the law’s enforcer. Legislative leaders contend that Wednesday’s budget action complies, but Brown’s declaration that the budget was unbalanced gives Chiang grounds to stop the paychecks if he wishes. Chiang was waffling Thursday, saying he wants “to complete our analysis” before deciding whether to pay lawmakers at the end of the month. If Chiang pays legislators, the rejected budget will look like a giant charade by Democrats to evade the law.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/opinionla/la-ed-budget-20110617,0,1483301.story\">Budget veto: Brown’s stark choice\u003c/a> (LA Times)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>By vetoing the bills, Brown kept his campaign promise not to support budgetary shell games. He also presented lawmakers with a stark choice: either agree to his proposal to ask voters to extend some temporary tax increases, or make deeper cuts in schools, universities and public safety. Those areas weren’t hit as hard as safety net programs were when the Legislature approved more than $10 billion in cuts in March, but with a budget gap of about $10 billion remaining, those programs are the biggest targets.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Lawmakers have already cut general-fund spending to 2005 levels, and cutting billions more would take an unacceptable toll on vital state services. And California doesn’t have to go down that road — Republicans have said they’re willing to let the public vote on Brown’s tax proposal, which would maintain a temporary hike in sales and vehicle taxes for five years instead of allowing them to drop on July 1.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/06/17/ED921JUS1S.DTL\">Gov. Jerry Brown’s budget veto was the right move\u003c/a> (SF Chronicle)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>…The spending plan that Brown shot down invited a veto. It siphoned off tobacco tax money, stalled payments to schools and universities, and peddled state buildings for quick cash. For months, Brown has weighed in against this kind of trickery. The one saving grace: Democrats showed balky Republicans that a budget could be done without them. The shock value of a veto clearly raises the stakes.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.insidebayarea.com/opinion/ci_18291614\">Brown was right to veto the sham budget\u003c/a> (Bay Area News Group)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The budget that was passed was an unworkable melange of unrealistic revenue projections, steeper spending cuts and of dubious legality concerning motor vehicle license “fees” and local sales taxes. But it doesn’t matter now that Brown has vetoed it, making moot threats by anti-tax groups to sue. Even before the governor acted, everyone in Sacramento understood that the budget was unworkable and was passed for the sole reason of preserving legislative pay and benefits. Now that the on-time budget charade has been played out, Brown and lawmakers in both parties still have to reach an agreement that preserves essential state services and does not overburden taxpayers and businesses during a tough economic period.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2011/jun/17/budget-vetoed-now-back-work/\">Budget vetoed, now back to work\u003c/a> (San Diego Union-Tribune)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>…This was not a budget worth celebrating. Instead, it was one more example of the disconnect between how the real world operates and how the Capitol does. A business – or a family, for that matter – that can never make ends meet and faces financial ruin doesn’t celebrate when it makes one more bad decision. A business, or at least one with stockholders, would face a civil investigation and investor lawsuits if it issued dishonest financial statements.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But in Sacramento, the adoption of another state spending plan built on accounting gimmicks, bogus revenue predictions and legally problematic tax hikes is a reason to party. This is why we welcome Gov. Jerry Brown’s quick decision to veto the budget. “We can – and must – do better,” Brown said. “A balanced budget is critical to our economic recovery.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ocregister.com/opinion/brown-304831-budget-taxes.html\">A good veto, probably for wrong reasons\u003c/a> (Orange County Register)\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Gov. Jerry Brown was right Thursday to veto a gimmick-laden, tax-increasing, unworkable state budget. But he probably did it for the wrong reason. We agree with the governor that the budget passed by the Democratic-controlled Legislature was not realistically balanced, as the law intends, and that it would have extended deficits for years, adding to the state’s already enormous debt burden… Mr. Brown wants what he has wanted all year. Only new taxes adding up to $50 billion over five years can solve the budget shortfalls and address California’s longer-term fiscal problems, the governor insists. He’s wrong. Consequently, Mr. Brown and we dramatically disagree on what should come next.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.pe.com/localnews/opinion/editorials/stories/PE_OpEd_Opinion_D_op_17_ed_budget.2f6fc41.html\">Budget nonsense\u003c/a> (Riverside Press-Enterprise)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The misguided mess of a budget legislators approved on Wednesday deserved the quick death it died on Thursday. The Legislature should now pass a serious spending plan instead. The state does not need more pointless political theater, but a Legislature willing to put state finances on a more sustainable footing.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>An on-time state budget is not the same as a realistic spending plan. Democrats in the Legislature pushed through a majority-vote budget on Wednesday that supposedly closed the remaining $9.6 billion deficit in the $89 billion spending plan for 2011-12. The quick passage was aimed to preserve legislators’ pay; Prop. 25 requires them to forfeit income if a budget bill has not emerged by June 15. \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.fresnobee.com/2011/06/16/2430299/editorial-controller-chiang-should.html\">Controller Chiang should cancel lawmakers’ pay\u003c/a> (Fresno Bee)\u003cbr>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Now that Gov. Jerry Brown has vetoed the Democratic legislators’ flawed budget, Controller John Chiang can strike a blow for fiscal responsibility by withholding lawmakers’ pay. That’s what he should do…Democrats did approve a spending plan by that deadline. Democratic leaders say that action ought to be enough to ensure they continue to be paid. However, their plan seeks to close a $10 billion budget gap with a mix of cuts, accounting trickery, and legally questionable fee hikes and raids on other funds.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/31272/jerry-brown-veto-the-day-after-op-eds-from-around-the-state",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_13"
],
"tags": [
"news_2582",
"news_30",
"news_17968",
"news_70"
],
"label": "news_6944"
}
},
"podcastsReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"podcasts": {}
},
"radioProgramsReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"radioPrograms": {}
},
"programsReducer": {
"all-things-considered": {
"id": "all-things-considered",
"title": "All Things Considered",
"info": "Every weekday, \u003cem>All Things Considered\u003c/em> hosts Robert Siegel, Audie Cornish, Ari Shapiro, and Kelly McEvers present the program's trademark mix of news, interviews, commentaries, reviews, and offbeat features. Michel Martin hosts on the weekends.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 1pm-2pm, 4:30pm-6:30pm\u003cbr />SAT-SUN 5pm-6pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/All-Things-Considered-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/all-things-considered/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/all-things-considered"
},
"american-suburb-podcast": {
"id": "american-suburb-podcast",
"title": "American Suburb: The Podcast",
"tagline": "The flip side of gentrification, told through one town",
"info": "Gentrification is changing cities across America, forcing people from neighborhoods they have long called home. Call them the displaced. Now those priced out of the Bay Area are looking for a better life in an unlikely place. American Suburb follows this migration to one California town along the Delta, 45 miles from San Francisco. But is this once sleepy suburb ready for them?",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/American-Suburb-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/news/series/american-suburb-podcast",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 19
},
"link": "/news/series/american-suburb-podcast/",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/RBrW",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?mt=2&id=1287748328",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/American-Suburb-p1086805/",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/series/american-suburb-podcast/feed/podcast",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkMzMDExODgxNjA5"
}
},
"baycurious": {
"id": "baycurious",
"title": "Bay Curious",
"tagline": "Exploring the Bay Area, one question at a time",
"info": "KQED’s new podcast, Bay Curious, gets to the bottom of the mysteries — both profound and peculiar — that give the Bay Area its unique identity. And we’ll do it with your help! You ask the questions. You decide what Bay Curious investigates. And you join us on the journey to find the answers.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Bay-Curious-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Bay Curious",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/news/series/baycurious",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 3
},
"link": "/podcasts/baycurious",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bay-curious/id1172473406",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/500557090/bay-curious",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/category/bay-curious-podcast/feed/podcast",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/9a90d476-aa04-455d-9a4c-0871ed6216d4/bay-curious",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/bay-curious",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/6O76IdmhixfijmhTZLIJ8k"
}
},
"bbc-world-service": {
"id": "bbc-world-service",
"title": "BBC World Service",
"info": "The day's top stories from BBC News compiled twice daily in the week, once at weekends.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 9pm-10pm, TUE-FRI 1am-2am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/BBC-World-Service-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_world_service",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "BBC World Service"
},
"link": "/radio/program/bbc-world-service",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/global-news-podcast/id135067274?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/BBC-World-Service-p455581/",
"rss": "https://podcasts.files.bbci.co.uk/p02nq0gn.rss"
}
},
"californiareport": {
"id": "californiareport",
"title": "The California Report",
"tagline": "California, day by day",
"info": "KQED’s statewide radio news program providing daily coverage of issues, trends and public policy decisions.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-California-Report-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The California Report",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/californiareport",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 8
},
"link": "/californiareport",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/kqeds-the-california-report/id79681292",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/26099305-72af-4542-9dde-ac1807fe36d5/kqed-s-the-california-report",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432285393/the-california-report",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqedfm-kqeds-the-california-report-podcast-8838",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/tcram/feed/podcast"
}
},
"californiareportmagazine": {
"id": "californiareportmagazine",
"title": "The California Report Magazine",
"tagline": "Your state, your stories",
"info": "Every week, The California Report Magazine takes you on a road trip for the ears: to visit the places and meet the people who make California unique. The in-depth storytelling podcast from the California Report.",
"airtime": "FRI 4:30pm-5pm, 6:30pm-7pm, 11pm-11:30pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-California-Report-Magazine-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The California Report Magazine",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/californiareportmagazine",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 10
},
"link": "/californiareportmagazine",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-california-report-magazine/id1314750545",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM3NjkwNjk1OTAz",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/564733126/the-california-report-magazine",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-california-report-magazine",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/tcrmag/feed/podcast"
}
},
"city-arts": {
"id": "city-arts",
"title": "City Arts & Lectures",
"info": "A one-hour radio program to hear celebrated writers, artists and thinkers address contemporary ideas and values, often discussing the creative process. Please note: tapes or transcripts are not available",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/cityartsandlecture-300x300.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.cityarts.net/",
"airtime": "SUN 1pm-2pm, TUE 10pm, WED 1am",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "City Arts & Lectures"
},
"link": "https://www.cityarts.net",
"subscribe": {
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/City-Arts-and-Lectures-p692/",
"rss": "https://www.cityarts.net/feed/"
}
},
"closealltabs": {
"id": "closealltabs",
"title": "Close All Tabs",
"tagline": "Your irreverent guide to the trends redefining our world",
"info": "Close All Tabs breaks down how digital culture shapes our world through thoughtful insights and irreverent humor.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CAT_2_Tile-scaled.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Close All Tabs",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/closealltabs",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 1
},
"link": "/podcasts/closealltabs",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/close-all-tabs/id214663465",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC6993880386",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/92d9d4ac-67a3-4eed-b10a-fb45d45b1ef2/close-all-tabs",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/6LAJFHnGK1pYXYzv6SIol6?si=deb0cae19813417c"
}
},
"code-switch-life-kit": {
"id": "code-switch-life-kit",
"title": "Code Switch / Life Kit",
"info": "\u003cem>Code Switch\u003c/em>, which listeners will hear in the first part of the hour, has fearless and much-needed conversations about race. Hosted by journalists of color, the show tackles the subject of race head-on, exploring how it impacts every part of society — from politics and pop culture to history, sports and more.\u003cbr />\u003cbr />\u003cem>Life Kit\u003c/em>, which will be in the second part of the hour, guides you through spaces and feelings no one prepares you for — from finances to mental health, from workplace microaggressions to imposter syndrome, from relationships to parenting. The show features experts with real world experience and shares their knowledge. Because everyone needs a little help being human.\u003cbr />\u003cbr />\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510312/codeswitch\">\u003cem>Code Switch\u003c/em> offical site and podcast\u003c/a>\u003cbr />\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/lifekit\">\u003cem>Life Kit\u003c/em> offical site and podcast\u003c/a>\u003cbr />",
"airtime": "SUN 9pm-10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Code-Switch-Life-Kit-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/code-switch-life-kit",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/1112190608?mt=2&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnByLm9yZy9yc3MvcG9kY2FzdC5waHA_aWQ9NTEwMzEy",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3bExJ9JQpkwNhoHvaIIuyV",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510312/podcast.xml"
}
},
"commonwealth-club": {
"id": "commonwealth-club",
"title": "Commonwealth Club of California Podcast",
"info": "The Commonwealth Club of California is the nation's oldest and largest public affairs forum. As a non-partisan forum, The Club brings to the public airwaves diverse viewpoints on important topics. The Club's weekly radio broadcast - the oldest in the U.S., dating back to 1924 - is carried across the nation on public radio stations and is now podcasting. Our website archive features audio of our recent programs, as well as selected speeches from our long and distinguished history. This podcast feed is usually updated twice a week and is always un-edited.",
"airtime": "THU 10pm, FRI 1am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Commonwealth-Club-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.commonwealthclub.org/podcasts",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "Commonwealth Club of California"
},
"link": "/radio/program/commonwealth-club",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/commonwealth-club-of-california-podcast/id976334034?mt=2",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21tb253ZWFsdGhjbHViLm9yZy9hdWRpby9wb2RjYXN0L3dlZWtseS54bWw",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Commonwealth-Club-of-California-p1060/"
}
},
"forum": {
"id": "forum",
"title": "Forum",
"tagline": "The conversation starts here",
"info": "KQED’s live call-in program discussing local, state, national and international issues, as well as in-depth interviews.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 9am-11am, 10pm-11pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Forum-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Forum with Mina Kim and Alexis Madrigal",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/forum",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 9
},
"link": "/forum",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/kqeds-forum/id73329719",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM5NTU3MzgxNjMz",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432307980/forum",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqedfm-kqeds-forum-podcast",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC9557381633"
}
},
"freakonomics-radio": {
"id": "freakonomics-radio",
"title": "Freakonomics Radio",
"info": "Freakonomics Radio is a one-hour award-winning podcast and public-radio project hosted by Stephen Dubner, with co-author Steve Levitt as a regular guest. It is produced in partnership with WNYC.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/05/freakonomicsRadio.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://freakonomics.com/",
"airtime": "SUN 1am-2am, SAT 3pm-4pm",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/freakonomics-radio",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/4s8b",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/freakonomics-radio/id354668519",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/WNYC-Podcasts/Freakonomics-Radio-p272293/",
"rss": "https://feeds.feedburner.com/freakonomicsradio"
}
},
"fresh-air": {
"id": "fresh-air",
"title": "Fresh Air",
"info": "Hosted by Terry Gross, \u003cem>Fresh Air from WHYY\u003c/em> is the Peabody Award-winning weekday magazine of contemporary arts and issues. One of public radio's most popular programs, Fresh Air features intimate conversations with today's biggest luminaries.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 7pm-8pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Fresh-Air-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/fresh-air",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/4s8b",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=214089682&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Fresh-Air-p17/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/381444908/podcast.xml"
}
},
"here-and-now": {
"id": "here-and-now",
"title": "Here & Now",
"info": "A live production of NPR and WBUR Boston, in collaboration with stations across the country, Here & Now reflects the fluid world of news as it's happening in the middle of the day, with timely, in-depth news, interviews and conversation. Hosted by Robin Young, Jeremy Hobson and Tonya Mosley.",
"airtime": "MON-THU 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Here-And-Now-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/here-and-now",
"subsdcribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?mt=2&id=426698661",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Here--Now-p211/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510051/podcast.xml"
}
},
"hidden-brain": {
"id": "hidden-brain",
"title": "Hidden Brain",
"info": "Shankar Vedantam uses science and storytelling to reveal the unconscious patterns that drive human behavior, shape our choices and direct our relationships.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/hiddenbrain.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/series/423302056/hidden-brain",
"airtime": "SUN 7pm-8pm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "NPR"
},
"link": "/radio/program/hidden-brain",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/hidden-brain/id1028908750?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Science-Podcasts/Hidden-Brain-p787503/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510308/podcast.xml"
}
},
"how-i-built-this": {
"id": "how-i-built-this",
"title": "How I Built This with Guy Raz",
"info": "Guy Raz dives into the stories behind some of the world's best known companies. How I Built This weaves a narrative journey about innovators, entrepreneurs and idealists—and the movements they built.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/05/howIBuiltThis.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510313/how-i-built-this",
"airtime": "SUN 7:30pm-8pm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/how-i-built-this",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/3zxy",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/how-i-built-this-with-guy-raz/id1150510297?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Arts--Culture-Podcasts/How-I-Built-This-p910896/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510313/podcast.xml"
}
},
"hyphenacion": {
"id": "hyphenacion",
"title": "Hyphenación",
"tagline": "Where conversation and cultura meet",
"info": "What kind of no sabo word is Hyphenación? For us, it’s about living within a hyphenation. Like being a third-gen Mexican-American from the Texas border now living that Bay Area Chicano life. Like Xorje! Each week we bring together a couple of hyphenated Latinos to talk all about personal life choices: family, careers, relationships, belonging … everything is on the table. ",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Hyphenacion_FinalAssets_PodcastTile.png",
"imageAlt": "KQED Hyphenación",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/hyphenacion",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 15
},
"link": "/podcasts/hyphenacion",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hyphenaci%C3%B3n/id1191591838",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/2p3Fifq96nw9BPcmFdIq0o?si=39209f7b25774f38",
"youtube": "https://www.youtube.com/c/kqedarts",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/6c3dd23c-93fb-4aab-97ba-1725fa6315f1/hyphenaci%C3%B3n",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC2275451163"
}
},
"jerrybrown": {
"id": "jerrybrown",
"title": "The Political Mind of Jerry Brown",
"tagline": "Lessons from a lifetime in politics",
"info": "The Political Mind of Jerry Brown brings listeners the wisdom of the former Governor, Mayor, and presidential candidate. Scott Shafer interviewed Brown for more than 40 hours, covering the former governor's life and half-century in the political game – and Brown has some lessons he'd like to share. ",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Political-Mind-of-Jerry-Brown-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Political Mind of Jerry Brown",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/jerrybrown",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 18
},
"link": "/podcasts/jerrybrown",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/790253322/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1492194549",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/series/jerrybrown/feed/podcast/",
"tuneIn": "http://tun.in/pjGcK",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/54C1dmuyFyKMFttY6X2j6r?si=K8SgRCoISNK6ZbjpXrX5-w",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/44420f75-3b0e-4301-ab3b-16da6b09e543/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown"
}
},
"latino-usa": {
"id": "latino-usa",
"title": "Latino USA",
"airtime": "MON 1am-2am, SUN 6pm-7pm",
"info": "Latino USA, the radio journal of news and culture, is the only national, English-language radio program produced from a Latino perspective.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/latinoUsa.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://latinousa.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/latino-usa",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/xtTd",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=79681317&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Latino-USA-p621/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510016/podcast.xml"
}
},
"marketplace": {
"id": "marketplace",
"title": "Marketplace",
"info": "Our flagship program, helmed by Kai Ryssdal, examines what the day in money delivered, through stories, conversations, newsworthy numbers and more. Updated Monday through Friday at about 3:30 p.m. PT.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 4pm-4:30pm, MON-WED 6:30pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Marketplace-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.marketplace.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "American Public Media"
},
"link": "/radio/program/marketplace",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=201853034&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/APM-Marketplace-p88/",
"rss": "https://feeds.publicradio.org/public_feeds/marketplace-pm/rss/rss"
}
},
"masters-of-scale": {
"id": "masters-of-scale",
"title": "Masters of Scale",
"info": "Masters of Scale is an original podcast in which LinkedIn co-founder and Greylock Partner Reid Hoffman sets out to describe and prove theories that explain how great entrepreneurs take their companies from zero to a gazillion in ingenious fashion.",
"airtime": "Every other Wednesday June 12 through October 16 at 8pm (repeats Thursdays at 2am)",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Masters-of-Scale-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://mastersofscale.com/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "WaitWhat"
},
"link": "/radio/program/masters-of-scale",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "http://mastersofscale.app.link/",
"rss": "https://rss.art19.com/masters-of-scale"
}
},
"mindshift": {
"id": "mindshift",
"title": "MindShift",
"tagline": "A podcast about the future of learning and how we raise our kids",
"info": "The MindShift podcast explores the innovations in education that are shaping how kids learn. Hosts Ki Sung and Katrina Schwartz introduce listeners to educators, researchers, parents and students who are developing effective ways to improve how kids learn. We cover topics like how fed-up administrators are developing surprising tactics to deal with classroom disruptions; how listening to podcasts are helping kids develop reading skills; the consequences of overparenting; and why interdisciplinary learning can engage students on all ends of the traditional achievement spectrum. This podcast is part of the MindShift education site, a division of KQED News. KQED is an NPR/PBS member station based in San Francisco. You can also visit the MindShift website for episodes and supplemental blog posts or tweet us \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/MindShiftKQED\">@MindShiftKQED\u003c/a> or visit us at \u003ca href=\"/mindshift\">MindShift.KQED.org\u003c/a>",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mindshift-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED MindShift: How We Will Learn",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/mindshift/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 12
},
"link": "/podcasts/mindshift",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mindshift-podcast/id1078765985",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM1NzY0NjAwNDI5",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/464615685/mind-shift-podcast",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/stories-teachers-share",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/0MxSpNYZKNprFLCl7eEtyx"
}
},
"morning-edition": {
"id": "morning-edition",
"title": "Morning Edition",
"info": "\u003cem>Morning Edition\u003c/em> takes listeners around the country and the world with multi-faceted stories and commentaries every weekday. Hosts Steve Inskeep, David Greene and Rachel Martin bring you the latest breaking news and features to prepare you for the day.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 3am-9am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Morning-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/morning-edition/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/morning-edition"
},
"onourwatch": {
"id": "onourwatch",
"title": "On Our Watch",
"tagline": "Deeply-reported investigative journalism",
"info": "For decades, the process for how police police themselves has been inconsistent – if not opaque. In some states, like California, these proceedings were completely hidden. After a new police transparency law unsealed scores of internal affairs files, our reporters set out to examine these cases and the shadow world of police discipline. On Our Watch brings listeners into the rooms where officers are questioned and witnesses are interrogated to find out who this system is really protecting. Is it the officers, or the public they've sworn to serve?",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/On-Our-Watch-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "On Our Watch from NPR and KQED",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/onourwatch",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 11
},
"link": "/podcasts/onourwatch",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1567098962",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5ucHIub3JnLzUxMDM2MC9wb2RjYXN0LnhtbD9zYz1nb29nbGVwb2RjYXN0cw",
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/onourwatch",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/0OLWoyizopu6tY1XiuX70x",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/On-Our-Watch-p1436229/",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/show/on-our-watch",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510360/podcast.xml"
}
},
"on-the-media": {
"id": "on-the-media",
"title": "On The Media",
"info": "Our weekly podcast explores how the media 'sausage' is made, casts an incisive eye on fluctuations in the marketplace of ideas, and examines threats to the freedom of information and expression in America and abroad. For one hour a week, the show tries to lift the veil from the process of \"making media,\" especially news media, because it's through that lens that we see the world and the world sees us",
"airtime": "SUN 2pm-3pm, MON 12am-1am",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/onTheMedia.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/otm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "wnyc"
},
"link": "/radio/program/on-the-media",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/on-the-media/id73330715?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/On-the-Media-p69/",
"rss": "http://feeds.wnyc.org/onthemedia"
}
},
"pbs-newshour": {
"id": "pbs-newshour",
"title": "PBS NewsHour",
"info": "Analysis, background reports and updates from the PBS NewsHour putting today's news in context.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 3pm-4pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/PBS-News-Hour-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "pbs"
},
"link": "/radio/program/pbs-newshour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/pbs-newshour-full-show/id394432287?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/PBS-NewsHour---Full-Show-p425698/",
"rss": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/feeds/rss/podcasts/show"
}
},
"perspectives": {
"id": "perspectives",
"title": "Perspectives",
"tagline": "KQED's series of daily listener commentaries since 1991",
"info": "KQED's series of daily listener commentaries since 1991.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Perspectives_Tile_Final.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Perspectives",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/perspectives/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 14
},
"link": "/perspectives",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id73801135",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432309616/perspectives",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/perspectives/category/perspectives/feed/",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93dzIua3FlZC5vcmcvcGVyc3BlY3RpdmVzL2NhdGVnb3J5L3BlcnNwZWN0aXZlcy9mZWVkLw"
}
},
"planet-money": {
"id": "planet-money",
"title": "Planet Money",
"info": "The economy explained. Imagine you could call up a friend and say, Meet me at the bar and tell me what's going on with the economy. Now imagine that's actually a fun evening.",
"airtime": "SUN 3pm-4pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/planetmoney.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/sections/money/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/planet-money",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/M4f5",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/planet-money/id290783428?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Business--Economics-Podcasts/Planet-Money-p164680/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510289/podcast.xml"
}
},
"politicalbreakdown": {
"id": "politicalbreakdown",
"title": "Political Breakdown",
"tagline": "Politics from a personal perspective",
"info": "Political Breakdown is a new series that explores the political intersection of California and the nation. Each week hosts Scott Shafer and Marisa Lagos are joined with a new special guest to unpack politics -- with personality — and offer an insider’s glimpse at how politics happens.",
"airtime": "THU 6:30pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Political-Breakdown-2024-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Political Breakdown",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/politicalbreakdown",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 5
},
"link": "/podcasts/politicalbreakdown",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/political-breakdown/id1327641087",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/e0c2d153-ad36-4c8d-901d-f1da6a724824/political-breakdown",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/572155894/political-breakdown",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/political-breakdown",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/07RVyIjIdk2WDuVehvBMoN",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/political-breakdown/feed/podcast"
}
},
"possible": {
"id": "possible",
"title": "Possible",
"info": "Possible is hosted by entrepreneur Reid Hoffman and writer Aria Finger. Together in Possible, Hoffman and Finger lead enlightening discussions about building a brighter collective future. The show features interviews with visionary guests like Trevor Noah, Sam Altman and Janette Sadik-Khan. Possible paints an optimistic portrait of the world we can create through science, policy, business, art and our shared humanity. It asks: What if everything goes right for once? How can we get there? Each episode also includes a short fiction story generated by advanced AI GPT-4, serving as a thought-provoking springboard to speculate how humanity could leverage technology for good.",
"airtime": "SUN 2pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Possible-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.possible.fm/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "Possible"
},
"link": "/radio/program/possible",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/possible/id1677184070",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/730YpdUSNlMyPQwNnyjp4k"
}
},
"pri-the-world": {
"id": "pri-the-world",
"title": "PRI's The World: Latest Edition",
"info": "Each weekday, host Marco Werman and his team of producers bring you the world's most interesting stories in an hour of radio that reminds us just how small our planet really is.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 2pm-3pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-World-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.pri.org/programs/the-world",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "PRI"
},
"link": "/radio/program/pri-the-world",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/pris-the-world-latest-edition/id278196007?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/News--Politics-Podcasts/PRIs-The-World-p24/",
"rss": "http://feeds.feedburner.com/pri/theworld"
}
},
"radiolab": {
"id": "radiolab",
"title": "Radiolab",
"info": "A two-time Peabody Award-winner, Radiolab is an investigation told through sounds and stories, and centered around one big idea. In the Radiolab world, information sounds like music and science and culture collide. Hosted by Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich, the show is designed for listeners who demand skepticism, but appreciate wonder. WNYC Studios is the producer of other leading podcasts including Freakonomics Radio, Death, Sex & Money, On the Media and many more.",
"airtime": "SUN 12am-1am, SAT 2pm-3pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/radiolab1400.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/radiolab/",
"meta": {
"site": "science",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/radiolab",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/radiolab/id152249110?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/RadioLab-p68032/",
"rss": "https://feeds.wnyc.org/radiolab"
}
},
"reveal": {
"id": "reveal",
"title": "Reveal",
"info": "Created by The Center for Investigative Reporting and PRX, Reveal is public radios first one-hour weekly radio show and podcast dedicated to investigative reporting. Credible, fact based and without a partisan agenda, Reveal combines the power and artistry of driveway moment storytelling with data-rich reporting on critically important issues. The result is stories that inform and inspire, arming our listeners with information to right injustices, hold the powerful accountable and improve lives.Reveal is hosted by Al Letson and showcases the award-winning work of CIR and newsrooms large and small across the nation. In a radio and podcast market crowded with choices, Reveal focuses on important and often surprising stories that illuminate the world for our listeners.",
"airtime": "SAT 4pm-5pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/reveal300px.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.revealnews.org/episodes/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/reveal",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/reveal/id886009669",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Reveal-p679597/",
"rss": "http://feeds.revealradio.org/revealpodcast"
}
},
"rightnowish": {
"id": "rightnowish",
"title": "Rightnowish",
"tagline": "Art is where you find it",
"info": "Rightnowish digs into life in the Bay Area right now… ish. Journalist Pendarvis Harshaw takes us to galleries painted on the sides of liquor stores in West Oakland. We'll dance in warehouses in the Bayview, make smoothies with kids in South Berkeley, and listen to classical music in a 1984 Cutlass Supreme in Richmond. Every week, Pen talks to movers and shakers about how the Bay Area shapes what they create, and how they shape the place we call home.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Rightnowish-Podcast-Tile-500x500-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Rightnowish with Pendarvis Harshaw",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/rightnowish",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 16
},
"link": "/podcasts/rightnowish",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/721590300/rightnowish",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/arts/programs/rightnowish/feed/podcast",
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rightnowish/id1482187648",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/rightnowish",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkMxMjU5MTY3NDc4",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/7kEJuafTzTVan7B78ttz1I"
}
},
"science-friday": {
"id": "science-friday",
"title": "Science Friday",
"info": "Science Friday is a weekly science talk show, broadcast live over public radio stations nationwide. Each week, the show focuses on science topics that are in the news and tries to bring an educated, balanced discussion to bear on the scientific issues at hand. Panels of expert guests join host Ira Flatow, a veteran science journalist, to discuss science and to take questions from listeners during the call-in portion of the program.",
"airtime": "FRI 11am-1pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Science-Friday-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/science-friday",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/science-friday",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=73329284&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Science-Friday-p394/",
"rss": "http://feeds.wnyc.org/science-friday"
}
},
"snap-judgment": {
"id": "snap-judgment",
"title": "Snap Judgment",
"tagline": "Real stories with killer beats",
"info": "The Snap Judgment radio show and podcast mixes real stories with killer beats to produce cinematic, dramatic radio. Snap's musical brand of storytelling dares listeners to see the world through the eyes of another. This is storytelling... with a BEAT!! Snap first aired on public radio stations nationwide in July 2010. Today, Snap Judgment airs on over 450 public radio stations and is brought to the airwaves by KQED & PRX.",
"airtime": "SAT 1pm-2pm, 9pm-10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Snap-Judgment-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Snap Judgment",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://snapjudgment.org",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 4
},
"link": "https://snapjudgment.org",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/snap-judgment/id283657561",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/449018144/snap-judgment",
"stitcher": "https://www.pandora.com/podcast/snap-judgment/PC:241?source=stitcher-sunset",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3Cct7ZWmxHNAtLgBTqjC5v",
"rss": "https://snap.feed.snapjudgment.org/"
}
},
"soldout": {
"id": "soldout",
"title": "SOLD OUT: Rethinking Housing in America",
"tagline": "A new future for housing",
"info": "Sold Out: Rethinking Housing in America",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Sold-Out-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Sold Out: Rethinking Housing in America",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/soldout",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 13
},
"link": "/podcasts/soldout",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/911586047/s-o-l-d-o-u-t-a-new-future-for-housing",
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/introducing-sold-out-rethinking-housing-in-america/id1531354937",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/soldout",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/38dTBSk2ISFoPiyYNoKn1X",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/sold-out-rethinking-housing-in-america",
"tunein": "https://tunein.com/radio/SOLD-OUT-Rethinking-Housing-in-America-p1365871/"
}
},
"spooked": {
"id": "spooked",
"title": "Spooked",
"tagline": "True-life supernatural stories",
"info": "",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Spooked-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Spooked",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://spookedpodcast.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 7
},
"link": "https://spookedpodcast.org/",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spooked/id1279361017",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/549547848/snap-judgment-presents-spooked",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/76571Rfl3m7PLJQZKQIGCT",
"rss": "https://feeds.simplecast.com/TBotaapn"
}
},
"tech-nation": {
"id": "tech-nation",
"title": "Tech Nation Radio Podcast",
"info": "Tech Nation is a weekly public radio program, hosted by Dr. Moira Gunn. Founded in 1993, it has grown from a simple interview show to a multi-faceted production, featuring conversations with noted technology and science leaders, and a weekly science and technology-related commentary.",
"airtime": "FRI 10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Tech-Nation-Radio-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://technation.podomatic.com/",
"meta": {
"site": "science",
"source": "Tech Nation Media"
},
"link": "/radio/program/tech-nation",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://technation.podomatic.com/rss2.xml"
}
},
"ted-radio-hour": {
"id": "ted-radio-hour",
"title": "TED Radio Hour",
"info": "The TED Radio Hour is a journey through fascinating ideas, astonishing inventions, fresh approaches to old problems, and new ways to think and create.",
"airtime": "SUN 3pm-4pm, SAT 10pm-11pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/tedRadioHour.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/?showDate=2018-06-22",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/ted-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/8vsS",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=523121474&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/TED-Radio-Hour-p418021/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510298/podcast.xml"
}
},
"thebay": {
"id": "thebay",
"title": "The Bay",
"tagline": "Local news to keep you rooted",
"info": "Host Devin Katayama walks you through the biggest story of the day with reporters and newsmakers.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Bay-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Bay",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/thebay",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 2
},
"link": "/podcasts/thebay",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-bay/id1350043452",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/d800ea4c-7a2c-42f2-b861-edaf78a5db0b/the-bay",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/586725995/the-bay",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-bay",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/4BIKBKIujizLHlIlBNaAqQ",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC8259786327"
}
},
"thelatest": {
"id": "thelatest",
"title": "The Latest",
"tagline": "Trusted local news in real time",
"info": "",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/The-Latest-2025-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Latest",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/thelatest",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 6
},
"link": "/thelatest",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-latest-from-kqed/id1197721799",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/1257949365/the-latest-from-k-q-e-d",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/5KIIXMgM9GTi5AepwOYvIZ?si=bd3053fec7244dba",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC9137121918"
}
},
"theleap": {
"id": "theleap",
"title": "The Leap",
"tagline": "What if you closed your eyes, and jumped?",
"info": "Stories about people making dramatic, risky changes, told by award-winning public radio reporter Judy Campbell.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Leap-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Leap",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/theleap",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 17
},
"link": "/podcasts/theleap",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-leap/id1046668171",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/447248267/the-leap",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-leap",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3sSlVHHzU0ytLwuGs1SD1U",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/programs/the-leap/feed/podcast"
}
},
"the-moth-radio-hour": {
"id": "the-moth-radio-hour",
"title": "The Moth Radio Hour",
"info": "Since its launch in 1997, The Moth has presented thousands of true stories, told live and without notes, to standing-room-only crowds worldwide. Moth storytellers stand alone, under a spotlight, with only a microphone and a roomful of strangers. The storyteller and the audience embark on a high-wire act of shared experience which is both terrifying and exhilarating. Since 2008, The Moth podcast has featured many of our favorite stories told live on Moth stages around the country. For information on all of our programs and live events, visit themoth.org.",
"airtime": "SAT 8pm-9pm and SUN 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/theMoth.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://themoth.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "prx"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-moth-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-moth-podcast/id275699983?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/The-Moth-p273888/",
"rss": "http://feeds.themoth.org/themothpodcast"
}
},
"the-new-yorker-radio-hour": {
"id": "the-new-yorker-radio-hour",
"title": "The New Yorker Radio Hour",
"info": "The New Yorker Radio Hour is a weekly program presented by the magazine's editor, David Remnick, and produced by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Each episode features a diverse mix of interviews, profiles, storytelling, and an occasional burst of humor inspired by the magazine, and shaped by its writers, artists, and editors. This isn't a radio version of a magazine, but something all its own, reflecting the rich possibilities of audio storytelling and conversation. Theme music for the show was composed and performed by Merrill Garbus of tUnE-YArDs.",
"airtime": "SAT 10am-11am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-New-Yorker-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/tnyradiohour",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-new-yorker-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1050430296",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/WNYC-Podcasts/New-Yorker-Radio-Hour-p803804/",
"rss": "https://feeds.feedburner.com/newyorkerradiohour"
}
},
"the-sam-sanders-show": {
"id": "the-sam-sanders-show",
"title": "The Sam Sanders Show",
"info": "One of public radio's most dynamic voices, Sam Sanders helped launch The NPR Politics Podcast and hosted NPR's hit show It's Been A Minute. Now, the award-winning host returns with something brand new, The Sam Sanders Show. Every week, Sam Sanders and friends dig into the culture that shapes our lives: what's driving the biggest trends, how artists really think, and even the memes you can't stop scrolling past. Sam is beloved for his way of unpacking the world and bringing you up close to fresh currents and engaging conversations. The Sam Sanders Show is smart, funny and always a good time.",
"airtime": "FRI 12-1pm AND SAT 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-Sam-Sanders-Show-Podcast-Tile-400x400-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.kcrw.com/shows/the-sam-sanders-show/latest",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "KCRW"
},
"link": "https://www.kcrw.com/shows/the-sam-sanders-show/latest",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://feed.cdnstream1.com/zjb/feed/download/ac/28/59/ac28594c-e1d0-4231-8728-61865cdc80e8.xml"
}
},
"the-splendid-table": {
"id": "the-splendid-table",
"title": "The Splendid Table",
"info": "\u003cem>The Splendid Table\u003c/em> hosts our nation's conversations about cooking, sustainability and food culture.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Splendid-Table-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.splendidtable.org/",
"airtime": "SUN 10-11 pm",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-splendid-table"
},
"this-american-life": {
"id": "this-american-life",
"title": "This American Life",
"info": "This American Life is a weekly public radio show, heard by 2.2 million people on more than 500 stations. Another 2.5 million people download the weekly podcast. It is hosted by Ira Glass, produced in collaboration with Chicago Public Media, delivered to stations by PRX The Public Radio Exchange, and has won all of the major broadcasting awards.",
"airtime": "SAT 12pm-1pm, 7pm-8pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/thisAmericanLife.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.thisamericanlife.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "wbez"
},
"link": "/radio/program/this-american-life",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=201671138&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"rss": "https://www.thisamericanlife.org/podcast/rss.xml"
}
},
"tinydeskradio": {
"id": "tinydeskradio",
"title": "Tiny Desk Radio",
"info": "We're bringing the best of Tiny Desk to the airwaves, only on public radio.",
"airtime": "SUN 8pm and SAT 9pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/300x300-For-Member-Station-Logo-Tiny-Desk-Radio-@2x.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/series/g-s1-52030/tiny-desk-radio",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/tinydeskradio",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/g-s1-52030/rss.xml"
}
},
"wait-wait-dont-tell-me": {
"id": "wait-wait-dont-tell-me",
"title": "Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!",
"info": "Peter Sagal and Bill Kurtis host the weekly NPR News quiz show alongside some of the best and brightest news and entertainment personalities.",
"airtime": "SUN 10am-11am, SAT 11am-12pm, SAT 6pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Wait-Wait-Podcast-Tile-300x300-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/wait-wait-dont-tell-me/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/wait-wait-dont-tell-me",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/Xogv",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=121493804&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Wait-Wait-Dont-Tell-Me-p46/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/344098539/podcast.xml"
}
},
"weekend-edition-saturday": {
"id": "weekend-edition-saturday",
"title": "Weekend Edition Saturday",
"info": "Weekend Edition Saturday wraps up the week's news and offers a mix of analysis and features on a wide range of topics, including arts, sports, entertainment, and human interest stories. The two-hour program is hosted by NPR's Peabody Award-winning Scott Simon.",
"airtime": "SAT 5am-10am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Weekend-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/weekend-edition-saturday/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/weekend-edition-saturday"
},
"weekend-edition-sunday": {
"id": "weekend-edition-sunday",
"title": "Weekend Edition Sunday",
"info": "Weekend Edition Sunday features interviews with newsmakers, artists, scientists, politicians, musicians, writers, theologians and historians. The program has covered news events from Nelson Mandela's 1990 release from a South African prison to the capture of Saddam Hussein.",
"airtime": "SUN 5am-10am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Weekend-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/weekend-edition-sunday/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/weekend-edition-sunday"
}
},
"racesReducer": {},
"racesGenElectionReducer": {},
"racesGenElection2026Reducer": {},
"radioSchedulesReducer": {},
"listsReducer": {
"posts/news?tag=politics": {
"isFetching": false,
"latestQuery": {
"from": 3240,
"size": 12
},
"vitalsOnly": false,
"totalRequested": 11,
"isLoading": false,
"isLoadingMore": true,
"total": {
"value": 3251,
"relation": "eq"
},
"items": [
"news_49051",
"news_47400",
"news_44907",
"news_41401",
"news_41121",
"news_40879",
"news_37109",
"news_34678",
"news_33319",
"news_31875",
"news_31272"
],
"complete": true
}
},
"recallGuideReducer": {
"intros": {},
"policy": {},
"candidates": {}
},
"savedArticleReducer": {
"articles": [],
"status": {}
},
"newslettersReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"newsletters": {},
"isSubscribing": false,
"isUnsubscribing": false,
"subscribedNewsletters": {}
},
"termsReducer": {
"about": {
"name": "About",
"type": "terms",
"id": "about",
"slug": "about",
"link": "/about",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"arts": {
"name": "Arts & Culture",
"grouping": [
"arts",
"pop",
"trulyca"
],
"description": "KQED Arts provides daily in-depth coverage of the Bay Area's music, art, film, performing arts, literature and arts news, as well as cultural commentary and criticism.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "arts",
"slug": "arts",
"link": "/arts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"artschool": {
"name": "Art School",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "artschool",
"slug": "artschool",
"link": "/artschool",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"bayareabites": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "bayareabites",
"slug": "bayareabites",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"bayareahiphop": {
"name": "Bay Area Hiphop",
"type": "terms",
"id": "bayareahiphop",
"slug": "bayareahiphop",
"link": "/bayareahiphop",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"campaign21": {
"name": "Campaign 21",
"type": "terms",
"id": "campaign21",
"slug": "campaign21",
"link": "/campaign21",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"careers": {
"name": "Careers",
"type": "terms",
"id": "careers",
"slug": "careers",
"link": "/careers",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"checkplease": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "checkplease",
"slug": "checkplease",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"education": {
"name": "Education",
"grouping": [
"education"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "education",
"slug": "education",
"link": "/education",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"elections": {
"name": "Elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "elections",
"slug": "elections",
"link": "/elections",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"events": {
"name": "Events",
"type": "terms",
"id": "events",
"slug": "events",
"link": "/events",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"event": {
"name": "Event",
"alias": "events",
"type": "terms",
"id": "event",
"slug": "event",
"link": "/event",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"filmschoolshorts": {
"name": "Film School Shorts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "filmschoolshorts",
"slug": "filmschoolshorts",
"link": "/filmschoolshorts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"food": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "food",
"slug": "food",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"forum": {
"name": "Forum",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/forum?",
"parent": "news",
"type": "terms",
"id": "forum",
"slug": "forum",
"link": "/forum",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"futureofyou": {
"name": "Future of You",
"grouping": [
"science",
"futureofyou"
],
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "futureofyou",
"slug": "futureofyou",
"link": "/futureofyou",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"jpepinheart": {
"name": "KQED food",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/food,bayareabites,checkplease",
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "jpepinheart",
"slug": "jpepinheart",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"liveblog": {
"name": "Live Blog",
"type": "terms",
"id": "liveblog",
"slug": "liveblog",
"link": "/liveblog",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"livetv": {
"name": "Live TV",
"parent": "tv",
"type": "terms",
"id": "livetv",
"slug": "livetv",
"link": "/livetv",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"lowdown": {
"name": "The Lowdown",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/lowdown?",
"parent": "news",
"type": "terms",
"id": "lowdown",
"slug": "lowdown",
"link": "/lowdown",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"mindshift": {
"name": "Mindshift",
"parent": "news",
"description": "MindShift explores the future of education by highlighting the innovative – and sometimes counterintuitive – ways educators and parents are helping all children succeed.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "mindshift",
"slug": "mindshift",
"link": "/mindshift",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"news": {
"name": "News",
"grouping": [
"news",
"forum"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "news",
"slug": "news",
"link": "/news",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"newsletters": {
"name": "newsletters",
"type": "terms",
"id": "newsletters",
"slug": "newsletters",
"link": "/newsletters",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"perspectives": {
"name": "Perspectives",
"parent": "radio",
"type": "terms",
"id": "perspectives",
"slug": "perspectives",
"link": "/perspectives",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"podcasts": {
"name": "Podcasts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "podcasts",
"slug": "podcasts",
"link": "/podcasts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"pop": {
"name": "Pop",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "pop",
"slug": "pop",
"link": "/pop",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"pressroom": {
"name": "Pressroom",
"type": "terms",
"id": "pressroom",
"slug": "pressroom",
"link": "/pressroom",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"quest": {
"name": "Quest",
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "quest",
"slug": "quest",
"link": "/quest",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"radio": {
"name": "Radio",
"grouping": [
"forum",
"perspectives"
],
"description": "Listen to KQED Public Radio – home of Forum and The California Report – on 88.5 FM in San Francisco, 89.3 FM in Sacramento, 88.3 FM in Santa Rosa and 88.1 FM in Martinez.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "radio",
"slug": "radio",
"link": "/radio",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"root": {
"name": "KQED",
"image": "https://ww2.kqed.org/app/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"imageWidth": 1200,
"imageHeight": 630,
"headData": {
"title": "KQED | News, Radio, Podcasts, TV | Public Media for Northern California",
"description": "KQED provides public radio, television, and independent reporting on issues that matter to the Bay Area. We’re the NPR and PBS member station for Northern California."
},
"type": "terms",
"id": "root",
"slug": "root",
"link": "/root",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"science": {
"name": "Science",
"grouping": [
"science",
"futureofyou"
],
"description": "KQED Science brings you award-winning science and environment coverage from the Bay Area and beyond.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "science",
"slug": "science",
"link": "/science",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"stateofhealth": {
"name": "State of Health",
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "stateofhealth",
"slug": "stateofhealth",
"link": "/stateofhealth",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"support": {
"name": "Support",
"type": "terms",
"id": "support",
"slug": "support",
"link": "/support",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"thedolist": {
"name": "The Do List",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "thedolist",
"slug": "thedolist",
"link": "/thedolist",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"trulyca": {
"name": "Truly CA",
"grouping": [
"arts",
"pop",
"trulyca"
],
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "trulyca",
"slug": "trulyca",
"link": "/trulyca",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"tv": {
"name": "TV",
"type": "terms",
"id": "tv",
"slug": "tv",
"link": "/tv",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"voterguide": {
"name": "Voter Guide",
"parent": "elections",
"alias": "elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "voterguide",
"slug": "voterguide",
"link": "/voterguide",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"guiaelectoral": {
"name": "Guia Electoral",
"parent": "elections",
"alias": "elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "guiaelectoral",
"slug": "guiaelectoral",
"link": "/guiaelectoral",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"news_tag_politics": {
"isLoading": true
},
"news_17968": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_17968",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "17968",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Politics",
"slug": "politics",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Politics | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 18002,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/politics"
},
"news_6944": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_6944",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "6944",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": "https://ww2.kqed.org/app/uploads/sites/10/2014/10/News-Fix-Logo-Web-Banners-04.png",
"name": "News Fix",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "program",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": "The News Fix is a daily news podcast from KQED that breaks down the latest headlines and provides in-depth analysis of the stories that matter to the Bay Area.",
"title": "News Fix - Daily Dose of Bay Area News | KQED",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 6968,
"slug": "news-fix",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/program/news-fix"
},
"news_223": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_223",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "223",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Arts and Culture",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Arts and Culture Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 231,
"slug": "arts-and-culture",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/arts-and-culture"
},
"news_1612": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1612",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1612",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "online sales tax",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "online sales tax Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1624,
"slug": "online-sales-tax",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/online-sales-tax"
},
"news_71": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_71",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "71",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "State Budget",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "State Budget Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 72,
"slug": "state-budget-2",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/state-budget-2"
},
"news_423": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_423",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "423",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "taxes",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "taxes Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 432,
"slug": "taxes",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/taxes"
},
"news_1170": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1170",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1170",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Tim Donnelly",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Tim Donnelly Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1181,
"slug": "tim-donnelly",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/tim-donnelly"
},
"news_13": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_13",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "13",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Politics",
"slug": "politics",
"taxonomy": "category",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Politics | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 13,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/politics"
},
"news_20013": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_20013",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "20013",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "education",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "education Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 20030,
"slug": "education",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/education"
},
"news_204": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_204",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "204",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Jean Quan",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Jean Quan Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 212,
"slug": "jean-quan",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/jean-quan"
},
"news_166": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_166",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "166",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Joshua Johnson",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Joshua Johnson Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 173,
"slug": "joshua-johnson",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/joshua-johnson"
},
"news_2083": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2083",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2083",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Occupy",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Occupy Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2098,
"slug": "occupy",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/occupy"
},
"news_1963": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1963",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1963",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Occupy Oakland",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Occupy Oakland Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1978,
"slug": "occupy-oakland",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/occupy-oakland"
},
"news_211": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_211",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "211",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Ranked-Choice Voting",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Ranked-Choice Voting Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 219,
"slug": "ranked-choice-voting",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/ranked-choice-voting"
},
"news_38": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_38",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "38",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "San Francisco",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "San Francisco Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 58,
"slug": "san-francisco",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/san-francisco"
},
"news_150": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_150",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "150",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "video",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "video Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 157,
"slug": "video",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/video"
},
"news_2027": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2027",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2027",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "voting",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "voting Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2042,
"slug": "voting",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/voting"
},
"news_18540": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_18540",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "18540",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Education",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Education Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2595,
"slug": "education",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/education"
},
"news_1895": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1895",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1895",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "affirmative action",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "affirmative action Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1910,
"slug": "affirmative-action",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/affirmative-action"
},
"news_1784": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1784",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1784",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Next Media Animation",
"slug": "next-media-animation",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Next Media Animation | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 1799,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/next-media-animation"
},
"news_757": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_757",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "757",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "University of California at Berkeley",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "University of California at Berkeley Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 766,
"slug": "university-of-california-at-berkeley",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/university-of-california-at-berkeley"
},
"news_98": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_98",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "98",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Youth",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Youth Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 101,
"slug": "youth",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/youth"
},
"news_8": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_8",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "8",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "News",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "News Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 8,
"slug": "news",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/news"
},
"news_728": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_728",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "728",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Chuck Reed",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Chuck Reed Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 737,
"slug": "chuck-reed",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/chuck-reed"
},
"news_152": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_152",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "152",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Government",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Government Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 159,
"slug": "government",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/government"
},
"news_118": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_118",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "118",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "pensions",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "pensions Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 122,
"slug": "pensions",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/pensions"
},
"news_18541": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_18541",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "18541",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "San Jose",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "San Jose Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 91,
"slug": "san-jose",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/san-jose"
},
"news_1758": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1758",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1758",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Economy",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": "Full coverage of the economy",
"title": "Economy Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2648,
"slug": "economy",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/economy"
},
"news_248": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_248",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "248",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Technology",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Technology Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 256,
"slug": "technology",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/technology"
},
"news_1611": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1611",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1611",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Amazon",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Amazon Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1623,
"slug": "amazon",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/amazon"
},
"news_6188": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_6188",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "6188",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Law and Justice",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Law and Justice Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 6212,
"slug": "law-and-justice",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/law-and-justice"
},
"news_893": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_893",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "893",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Defense of Marriage Act",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Defense of Marriage Act Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 903,
"slug": "defense-of-marriage-act",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/defense-of-marriage-act"
},
"news_274": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_274",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "274",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Dianne Feinstein",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Dianne Feinstein Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 282,
"slug": "dianne-feinstein",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/dianne-feinstein"
},
"news_15": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_15",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "15",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Forum",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Forum Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 15,
"slug": "forum",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/forum"
},
"news_82": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_82",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "82",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "LGBT",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "LGBT Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 83,
"slug": "lgbt",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/lgbt"
},
"news_1658": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1658",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1658",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "SB 490",
"slug": "sb-490",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "SB 490 | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 1670,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/sb-490"
},
"news_19906": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_19906",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "19906",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Environment",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Environment Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 19923,
"slug": "environment",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/environment"
},
"news_394": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_394",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "394",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "solar power",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "solar power Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 402,
"slug": "solar-power",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/solar-power"
},
"news_2582": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2582",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2582",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "government",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "government Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2598,
"slug": "government-2",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/government-2"
},
"news_30": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_30",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "30",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Jerry Brown",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Jerry Brown Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 30,
"slug": "jerry-brown",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/jerry-brown"
},
"news_70": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_70",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "70",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "state budget",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "state budget Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 71,
"slug": "state-budget",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/state-budget"
}
},
"userPermissionsReducer": {
"wpLoggedIn": false
},
"eventsReducer": {},
"fssReducer": {},
"tvDailyScheduleReducer": {},
"tvWeeklyScheduleReducer": {},
"tvPrimetimeScheduleReducer": {},
"tvMonthlyScheduleReducer": {},
"userAccountReducer": {
"user": {
"email": null,
"emailStatus": "EMAIL_UNVALIDATED",
"loggedStatus": "LOGGED_OUT",
"loggingChecked": false,
"articles": [],
"firstName": null,
"lastName": null,
"phoneNumber": null,
"fetchingMembership": false,
"membershipError": false,
"memberships": [
{
"id": null,
"startDate": null,
"firstName": null,
"lastName": null,
"familyNumber": null,
"memberNumber": null,
"memberSince": null,
"expirationDate": null,
"pfsEligible": false,
"isSustaining": false,
"membershipLevel": "Prospect",
"membershipStatus": "Non Member",
"lastGiftDate": null,
"renewalDate": null,
"lastDonationAmount": null
}
]
},
"authModal": {
"isOpen": false,
"view": "LANDING_VIEW"
},
"error": null
},
"youthMediaReducer": {},
"checkPleaseReducer": {
"filterData": {
"region": {
"key": "Restaurant Region",
"filters": [
"Any Region"
]
},
"cuisine": {
"key": "Restaurant Cuisine",
"filters": [
"Any Cuisine"
]
}
},
"restaurantDataById": {},
"restaurantIdsSorted": [],
"error": null
},
"userAgentReducer": {
"userAgent": "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)",
"isBot": true
}
}
