“Without strong judgment enforcement, wage theft decisions risk becoming paper victories rather than real justice,” said Daniela Urban, executive director of the Center for Workers’ Rights in Sacramento, who represented Lepe Martinez in claims before the Labor Commissioner’s Office.
Urban said that a years-long delay in deciding Lepe Martinez’s case allowed her former employer to sell a property before a judgment was issued and the agency could place a lien on it. The caregiver’s payment now depends on whether the employer, an 87-year-old man, eventually sells his home, she said.
“The earlier the Labor Commissioner has authority to preserve assets, the more likely there will be payment,” Urban said.
The state Labor Commissioner Lilia García-Brower said 72% of employers pay settlements or demands as a result of the wage claim process, and only 7% of cases are referred to the agency’s Judgment Enforcement Unit to help workers with collections.
“These businesses often represent the criminal element and require extensive resources to hold accountable,” García-Brower said. “Thus, our judgment enforcement efforts focus on the hardest cases against the worst operators on behalf of the most vulnerable workers.”
Before SB 588 was approved, the employer’s payment rate in the first year of a judgment pursued by the Labor Commissioner’s Office was just 17%. That rate increased to 46% today, she said, adding that the agency has moved “in the right direction,” but needs additional support.
Since the law’s enactment, the agency’s Judgment Enforcement Unit has recovered $125 million for workers, she added. The unit has increased its number of funded positions from fewer than two dozen three years ago to 33, to handle thousands of the hardest wage collection cases statewide.