upper waypoint

Moms 4 Housing and MLK's Case for Running 'Red Lights'

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Dominique Walker of Moms 4 Housing speaks to the media after being evicted from a house she and her group occupied in Oakland. (Molly Solomon/KQED)

Right before Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. was assassinated in 1968, he worked for over a year on something called the Poor People’s Campaign. The plan, in short, was to organize economically disenfranchised folks of all races, from all across the nation, and have them set up camp on Washington DC’s National Mall. King’s hope was that the visible public encampment would show the need for “radical wealth redistribution,” since economic inequality in America was, and still is, a national emergency.

“There is nothing wrong with the traffic law which says you have to stop for the red light,” King said, during a radio broadcast prior to the launch of the campaign. However, King added, “when a fire is raging, the fire truck goes right through that red light, and normal traffic had better get out of its way.” He explained that oppressive conditions had created “a fire raging now for the Negroes and the poor of this society,” and subsequently, the country would “need brigades of ambulance drivers that will ignore the red lights of the present system, until the emergency is solved.”

The current housing system in California, and especially the Bay Area, is a red light. Housing insecurity continues to spread like wildfire. It’s time to disregard the stop signs and send in all the fire trucks and ambulances we can muster.

Resurrection City in 1968, on the National Mall in Washington D.C.
Resurrection City in 1968, on the National Mall in Washington D.C. (Henry Zbyszynski / CC 2.0)

As we’ve seen in near-daily headlines, the alarms have been ringing for some time now. The sprawling tent cities alone are a wailing siren.

In Oakland, Mayor Libby Schaaf responded by housing people in Tuff Sheds, small buildings originally designed for storage and garden tools. In September of last year, President Trump threatened sanctions by the Environmental Protection Agency against San Francisco, saying, “They have to clean it up. We can’t have our cities going to hell.” A year earlier, a similar sentiment was shared by an official from the United Nations, calling conditions in the Bay Area “cruel and inhuman.”

Last month, two New York Times reporters compared and contrasted conditions in the Bay Area versus those of a slum in Central America. They found two advantages to living in a “shanty village” outside of Mexico City over being homeless on High Street in East Oakland: stability and running water.

As if those signs of distress aren’t loud enough, just last week Governor Gavin Newsom signed an executive order that “requires state agencies to take urgent and immediate action” to find space on state property where shelters can be built; the deadline is Jan. 31, and the order is supported by over $1 billion in funding. According to Governor Newsom, “the State of California is treating (homelessness) as a real emergency—because it is one.”

Members of the group Moms 4 Housing — Sharena Thomas, left, Carroll Fife, center, Dominique Walker, second from right, and Tolani KIng, right — outside a formerly vacant house on Magnolia Street in West Oakland, which they've occupied since November, despite an eviction order.
Members of the group Moms 4 Housing — Sharena Thomas, left, Carroll Fife, center, Dominique Walker, second from right, and Tolani KIng, right — outside a formerly vacant house on Magnolia Street in West Oakland. (Kate Wolffe/KQED)

So on Nov. 18, when Dominique Walker, Sameerah Karim and the Moms 4 Housing collective took up residency in a vacant two-story house on the 2900 block of Magnolia Street in West Oakland, they constituted, in essence, an emergency response vehicle racing toward a burning fire.

Their assertion that “housing is a human right” was driven by morality, while their occupation of the house completely disregarded the red light of the legal housing system.

They stayed in the house for nearly two months before being legally evicted last week and forcibly removed this week. Although it appears they’ve lost the battle to live in the home that’s legally owned by Wedgewood, the country’s biggest “fix and flip” investment company, their action brought awareness to a major component of the housing emergency: the fact that it’s sometimes more profitable for property owners to keep a house empty than to rent it.


As of last year, there were 4,071 unhoused people in Oakland, and 4,366 vacant homes.

Combine that with the fact that in 2019, the average rent for an apartment in Oakland rose to $2,905, a 7% increase from the previous year. Meanwhile, on Jan. 1, 2020, Oakland’s minimum wage rose only slightly, from $13.80 to $14.14.

Add on the context that Oakland’s homeless population rose 47% between 2017 and 2019, just for flavor.

And then add the not-so-secret ingredient: the fact that 70% of the unhoused population in Oakland is African American, while the city’s total population is around 25% African American, and declining.

You see why there’s a big-ass emergency cake in the oven. But Oakland isn’t the only bakery that’s on fire.

In California as a whole, black folks account for only 6.5% of the total population in this state, but roughly 30% of unhoused people. And nationally, African Americans account for only 13% of the total population, but account for 40% of unhoused individuals in the United States.

I look at those numbers, and I think about the other stories I’ve read, like how the City of Detroit, America’s largest majority African American city, erroneously over-taxed its homeowners. And the story of black farmers in the Mississippi delta being duped out of the deeds to their land. How “heirs property” clauses conned folks of color in the Carolinas. The history of redlining and the subprime mortgage crisis. And how last July, home ownership among African Americans fell to roughly the same rate it was when President Johnson signed the Fair Housing Act, not long after MLK’s assassination.

Dr. King never got to see the Poor People’s Campaign come to fruition. But after his death, the action was carried out under the guidance of Southern Christian Leadership Conference’s new president, Ralph Abernathy. The first people to occupy the space known as Resurrection City were a caravan of women’s groups, led by Coretta Scott King.

King reportedly started her trek to the capital after rallying people while standing on the very balcony where her husband was assassinated, telling the crowd that she wanted an America “where not some but all of God’s children have food, where not some but all of God’s children have decent housing, where not some but all of God’s children have a guaranteed annual income in keeping with the principles of liberty and grace.”

That sure sounds like an obvious precursor to the moral argument presented by Moms 4 Housing.

In the 50-plus years since Martin Luther King, Jr. made his ambulance analogy, homelessness, inequality and class division have proven to be, as they say, as American as apple pie.  Or rather, as American as the electric stoplight, which was actually invented here.


lower waypoint
next waypoint
Too Short Is Playing a Free Show Tuesday at the LakeKehlani, E-40, P-Lo to Celebrate Golden State Valkyries at SF Block PartyThe Return of East Oakland’s Menudo KingSan Jose’s Most Creative Paleta Cart Is Leveling Up the Mexican Ice Pop10 Free Concerts Not to Miss in the Bay Area This SummerMill Valley’s Sequoia Theatre Reopens With a Week of $1 Movies20 New Books Hitting Shelves This Summer That NPR Critics Can’t Wait to ReadA Battle Between Science and Religion, With Galileo Caught in the MiddleThe San Francisco Couple Whose Lifelong Love Changed AmericaMistah F.A.B. Drops ‘N.E.W. Oakland’ Music Video, Nearly 20 Years Later