Proposition 3
Should marriage rights for same-sex couples be enshrined in the state constitution?
Proposition 3 would formally repeal Proposition 8, which voters passed in 2008. Proposition 8 defined marriage in California as between one man and one woman, banning same sex marriage. In 2013, Proposition 8 was formally struck down by the U.S. Supreme Court, but the invalidated language remains in the state constitution. Proposition 3 would explicitly establish marriage as a fundamental right, furthering the right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
Yes Argument
Proposition 3 strikes an outdated remnant of a homophobic ballot measure. The language of Proposition 8 should not remain in the state constitution. It contradicts both the law, which now allows same-sex couples to marry, and California’s values, which support equality for LGBTQ people.
No Argument
Marriage should be defined as between a man and a woman. Proposition 3 will create an overly broad definition of marriage that could lead to the legalization of polyamory and polygamy.
FundraisingCampaign finance data comes from the California Secretary of State’s office or the Federal Election Commission.
Source: California Secretary of State
Key Supporters
In Support
- California Democratic Party
- Evan Low, state Assembly member
- Gavin Newsom, governor, California
- Scott Wiener, state senator
In Opposition
- California Capitol Connection
- California Family Council
- Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee
- Real Impact
To learn more about how we use your information, please read our privacy policy.
Signed up.
More Statewide Propositions
Should California issue $10 billion in bonds to help build or upgrade educational facilities?
Should California issue $10 billion in bonds to fund various climate- and environment-related projects?
Should California reduce the vote threshold needed to pass certain local bonds for affordable housing and public infrastructure projects?
Should California remove limits on the ability of cities to impose rent control policies capping annual rent increases?
Should California restrict how certain health care providers can spend revenue from prescription drug sales?
Should California make permanent an existing tax on health insurance companies and restrict how those funds can be used?
Should California roll back past reforms and make it easier to charge people with felony crimes and send them to jail or prison if they repeatedly shoplift, or possess some drugs, including fentanyl and methamphetamine?