This kind of information will also be shared in training sessions, online, and at hospitals and medical schools throughout the state before and after the law takes effect in 2016. (The precise date is not set; it will take effect 90 days after the end of the ongoing special legislative session.)
“Health care systems should start preparing now for their patients who are going to be requesting, and demanding, information about the End of Life Option Act,” says Kat West, policy director for Compassion & Choices, the advocacy group that led the charge for legalization in California and is spearheading the education campaign.
She says a few health care systems in California have called their counterparts in Oregon, where the practice has been legal since 1997, to find out how they have implemented the law there. For example, Kaiser Permanente in Oregon and Seattle Cancer Care in Washington hired patient advocates specifically to respond to requests for aid-in-dying medication and to guide patients and doctors through the process.
Medically-assisted suicide is also legal in Vermont and Montana. But West says California has some key differences that will influence implementation here.
“The challenge, of course, is California is so big,” West says. But, “in some ways, California is in a better position to start implementing aid-in-dying, because the infrastructure is already good and in place.”
Opponents have vowed to try to block the law from taking effect. A group calling itself Seniors Against Suicide filed paperwork this week to put a referendum before voters in November 2016, asking them to overturn the new law. The group needs to collect 365,880 signatures by January to qualify for the ballot, though it’s unclear if they have enough money to run a statewide campaign.
In Oregon, the law was delayed from taking effect for three years because of a lawsuit filed by the federal government. But West says that was 20 years ago, and is unlikely to happen in California.
Californians Against Assisted Suicide, a coalition of religious groups and disability rights advocates who fought the law through the legislative process, says it has not yet decided whether it will sue to stop the new law from going into effect.