Both the SEIU and the NUHW, the two unions that have been fighting over the right to represent Kaiser health care workers, told KQED's Rachel Dornhelm a National Labor Relations Board hearing scheduled for today has been postponed until next Monday.
Jon Borsos of NUHW says NUHW asked for the extension.
In October, NUHW, which splintered from SEIU in 2009, lost an election to decertify the larger union as the representative of 43,000 Kaiser workers in California, gaining just 37 percent of ballots cast. NUHW then filed a complaint with the NLRB, asserting that SEIU violated labor law during the campaign leading up to the vote.
As reported in the Sacramento Business Journal, the NLRB in January threw out 88 of 119 NUHW objections, scheduling a hearing on the remainder.
- SEIU and the new McCarthyism (Aug 31, 2010, San Francisco Bay Guardian)
- The case for SEIU at Kaiser - SEIU's response
Update Feb 8: Leighton Woodhouse, the Communications Director at NUHW, has sent us the email below, disputing my use of the word "prevailed" in the item about the decertification battle between the two unions at Catholic Healthcare West. And it's true, the Sacramento Bee article from which I gleaned that news uses the disclaimer right in the title, "Health care workers union claims (emphasis mine) victory over smaller rival." But I neglected to frame the item that way.
SEIU sent out a press release last week claiming that because a legal window during which workers can file for a union election at CHW had closed, CHW employees can no longer choose to join NUHW. CHW workers can't file for an election between now and the end of April, but they can file for election starting in May of this year, up until SEIU settles a new contract with CHW (their current contract doesn't expire until 2012). If SEIU believes its own press release, they don't understand the NLRB's rules for filing for election.
So in no way has SEIU "prevailed" at CHW.