The Oakland Tribune is running a story today on the status of the five sports that UC Berkeley announced it was cutting last September. At the time, the university said that a worsening budget situation had rendered the school's athletic program unsustainable, and that baseball, women's lacrosse, and gymnastics -- both men's and women's -- would be discontinued at the end of this academic year. The plan for men's rugby, widely considered to be the most successful varsity sport in university history, was to downgrade it to a "varsity club."
The announcement, naturally, was met with considerable consternation by Cal fans and alumni. (The quote from former Cal baseball player Jeff Kent: 'You're telling me the University of California is not going to have a baseball program? ... If I could put it in one word, I'm disgusted right now. I'm absolutely embarrassed to be a Cal baseball alum knowing the school is cutting the program.")
The pressure was enough so that two months later, Director of Athletics Sandy Barbour issued an apologia and an FAQ, which included a section that seemed meant to discourage any concerted effort to save the moribund teams:
Is there a possibility that some or all of teams could be reinstated?
To preserve the current structure with 29 teams would require the department’s donor base to come forward with unprecedented levels of additional philanthropy...A careful analysis indicated – and we believe continues to indicate – that it would be unrealistic to expect a significant number of donors to immediately increase their giving far above current levels.
The present situation already relies upon considerable and growing levels of annual philanthropy in the form of annual and endowment giving, an amount that has exceeded $15 million per year recently. In addition, the department is in the midst of a major campaign to fund the retrofit of Memorial Stadium in order to comply with the UC Regents’ requirement that the facility be renovated. Any effective effort to “save” teams would need to be incremental to goals currently in place and could not “cannibalize” any current endeavors.
Keeping these concerns in mind, neither the campus nor department leadership believes that the Cal Athletics community is likely to be able to raise the permanent funding required to offset the expenses associated with impacted teams. To make up the difference and maintain an acceptable level of longterm support for all 29 programs would call for, at the absolute minimum, a doubling of the current Athletic Department endowment, now at just under $70 million, in a relatively short period of time...
... It has been our view that the availability of the substantial incremental philanthropic commitments necessary to prevent a reduction in scope of our IA program is and has been quite unlikely.
In the event, however, that members of the Cal Athletics community do come forward with significant incremental philanthropic commitments to provide for multiple years of operating costs for the impacted group of teams and a long-term plan for permanent funding (endowment), the campus would of course review such a proposal and consider other alternatives presented. As a pragmatic matter and in fairness to Cal’s student-athletes and coaches, who are in the process of contemplating their future academic and career plans, the uncertainty around possibility of immediate reinstatement cannot be allowed to extend longer than January 31, 2011, which would be over four months after announcement of the scope reduction.
Well that deadline has now passed, and the university, at least publicly, is considering the possibility of reinstatement. Cal spokesman Dan Mogulof told the Tribune that the "process of 'review and analysis' already had begun and that the chancellor hopes to make a decision as soon as Friday."