upper waypoint

San Francisco Takes Anti-Abortion Activist Back to Court After Meme Mistrial

Anastasia Rogers faces criminal charges after using the words “Unalive them” in a video recorded outside a San Francisco Planned Parenthood. Her attorney said the phrase was taken out of context.
A Planned Parenthood Northern California health center in San Francisco, California, on Sept. 30, 2025.  (Smith Collection/Gado via Getty Images)

After a mistrial last week, a San Francisco judge has set a new trial date for an anti-abortion activist who posted a video on social media allegedly threatening a Planned Parenthood clinic escort, raising questions about the limits of political speech online.

Anastasia Rogers, a member of the anti-abortion group The Survivors, was charged with violating California’s version of the federal Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, which prohibits videotaping and distributing videos of reproductive health patients, employees or volunteers for the purpose of intimidating them from becoming or remaining in that role.

The district attorney’s office alleges that a video Rogers posted on social media, which features the words “Unalive them” over a clip of a San Francisco Planned Parenthood clinic escort, violated the FACES Act by threatening the person pictured. But Rogers’ attorneys argued in court that the clip was taken out of context, and her behavior was protected political speech.

Rogers’ criminal proceedings ended in a mistrial last week, after a jury failed to come to a unanimous decision. According to Rogers’ counsel, Michael Millen, the majority of jurors found her not guilty on both counts, citing a lack of evidence that her intention was to intimidate the volunteer.

He filed a motion asking the judge to dismiss the case on Monday. A pre-trial conference to discuss that motion is set for June 29, ahead of a new trial slated to begin June 30.

Millen said he believes under normal circumstances, the DA’s office would drop a case with such a seemingly low chance of success based on the initial jury’s leanings, but that this particular instance hasn’t been because of “political overtones.”

“If this was a robbery case, a carjacking case, and nine or 10 jurors said ‘not guilty,’ I assure you they would never retry the case,” he said.

Related Articles

The case centers around a 14-second video Rogers posted on Instagram in August, mimicking an internet trend set to a Pinkpantheress song, that juxtaposed clinic volunteers and pro-life protesters’ methods of “help[ing] women entering Planned Parenthood.” The video features a clip of Rogers with the text “Unalive them with kindness,” followed by a clip of a volunteer in a ‘clinic escort’ vest with the text “Unalive them.”

“Unalive” is internet slang often used instead of “kill” to skirt some social media apps’ content guidelines.

The suit alleges that the post threatened the life of the escort pictured, but Millen said Rogers was referring to what happens to fetuses during an abortion.

“ What she was trying to communicate was what the escorts do is ‘unalive’ their children, and given complications that can result from abortions gone wrong, actually injure or sometimes even kill the women who are going in,” he told KQED.

The video has garnered nearly 400,000 views.

Rogers was arrested outside of the same clinic in December on a warrant tied to the video. She said at the time that she was arrested for “sidewalk counseling,” or handing out pregnancy resource pamphlets.

The district attorney’s office did not respond to a request for comment on the charges.

KQED’s Desmond Meagley contributed to this report.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Player sponsored by