upper waypoint

Bay Area Nature Camp Fights ‘Bureaucracy and NIMBYism’ Ahead of Key Vote

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

This rendering shows plans for the Mosaic Project's proposed permanent home in Alameda County, which it hopes will serve up to 100 students per week, for about 130 days out of the year at a proposed new permanent facility in Castro Valley. The Alameda County Board of Supervisors is expected to vote Thursday to decide the fate of the project.  (Courtesy of the Mosaic Project)

The fate of a longstanding outdoor education program for Bay Area school children is expected to be decided Thursday, when Alameda County Supervisors could decide whether it has a future in Castro Valley.

For 25 years, the Mosaic Project has been bringing tens of thousands of fourth and fifth graders from different backgrounds together for a week of learning in nature, renting land in Napa and Santa Cruz counties — locations that require long bus rides for the kids.

The organization has spent $3 million and 10 years developing plans for a permanent home in Alameda County and hopes to serve up to 100 students per week, for about 130 days out of the year. It’s applying for a conditional land use permit to replace a former car storage building with cabins, a dining hall and staff residence on a piece of land off Cull Canyon Road.

School leaders and parents praise its mission of teaching the students to resolve conflicts peacefully, and numerous students inspired by the experience come back as youth leaders or counselors. But the Oakland-based nonprofit’s future is uncertain as it faces opposition by a small but influential group of Castro Valley residents over its plans to establish the camp near their rural properties.

“We give kids the experience of living in a welcoming, inclusive and joyful community. We’re the only ones that we know of that are doing this, and we’re in danger of not existing because of bureaucracy and NIMBYism,” Lara Mendel, co-founder of the project, said about the forces she’s up against.

A key vote that could seal the Mosaic Project’s fate may come from Nate Miley, the longtime supervisor who represents Castro Valley, an unincorporated community of 66,000 wedged between suburban sprawl and picturesque open spaces. Supporters of the outdoor recreation facility question whether he can vote independently, given that he appointed members of a municipal advisory council that unanimously rejected county staff recommendations to approve the project last August.

The Mosaic Project’s proposed new facility would replace a former car storage building with cabins, a dining hall and staff residence on a piece of land off Cull Canyon Road in Castro Valley. (Courtesy of the Mosaic Project)

“The MAC has, I would say, not very diverse appointments, and amplifies a Castro Valley that I don’t think is Castro Valley writ large,” said Michael Kusiak, a school board member who wants to provide local students convenient access to the program.

He said the appointees overwhelmingly represent “legacy voices” in the community who want to preserve the status quo in Castro Valley.

“Those voices tend to get amplified a bit more than others, and that’s frustrating, particularly when you hear people make these comments that makes you go, ‘What are we really talking about here, people? Maybe you want to say what you really mean,’” he said. “I haven’t found the arguments against the project to be very credible.”

Miley hasn’t publicly stated his position on the project. Messages seeking his comment were not returned on Wednesday.

He also nominated the majority of a five-member zoning board that voted against the proposal in December.

At that meeting, members of the governing board said they were worried the facility would increase traffic and wildfire danger in the boxed canyon, as well as strain the local water supply, which depends on wells.

Teddy Seibert, vice-chair of the West County Board of Zoning Adjustments, recused herself from voting because she owns a winery that shares boundaries with the Mosaic Project’s property. But in a letter submitted to the board, she called the proposal “a thinly-veiled attempt at urban expansion.” Her husband, Keith Seibert, said in public comments that he feared losing the winery’s license to serve alcohol if a youth facility moved in next door.

This rendering shows plans for the Mosaic Project’s proposed permanent home in Alameda County, which it hopes will serve up to 100 students per week, for about 130 days out of the year, at a proposed new permanent facility in Castro Valley. (Courtesy of the Mosaic Project)

Chuck Shipman, a resident of the Sequoians nudist club at the end of the road, said: “I would kind of feel concerned if somebody comes in there and says, ‘Well, I don’t want my kids around a nudist resort.’ That would affect our business also.”

Another resident worried about additional noise from “100 fourth and fifth graders at an evening campfire or tromping through the hills collecting forest products.” Several others sought to redefine the program as a school, which would violate Measure D, a 26-year-old initiative Miley championed to restrict urban development in rural parts of Alameda County.

However, the Mosaic Project’s land use attorney, David Smith, said an environmental review and scientific studies by outside consultants have addressed these concerns.

He said the facility, which would cover just two acres of the 37-acre property, will be built with fire-resistant materials that would create a break in the canyon in the event of a conflagration. Water tanks at the site would be reserved for fire suppression that everyone in the canyon can use.

“We have put in exhaustive modeling from fire experts of all possible scenarios,” Smith said. “It’s undisputed that the wildfire risk for the canyon as a whole is materially improved with the project than without it.”

Hydrologists also discovered a plentiful and drinkable water source on the site. As for the winery’s concern, Smith pointed out that a state law that refuses alcohol licenses for businesses near youth facilities doesn’t apply to those seeking a renewal.

“They herald [the Mosaic Project] but say it’s the wrong place for it, because a winery is the right place for parties but not for kids next door? That’s just hard to accept,” Smith said.

Email messages seeking comments from the Seiberts, owners of the TwiningVine Estate Winery, have not been returned.

Grace Russell, an eighth grade student at Oakland School of the Arts, said the long rides to the Santa Cruz Mountains created “a lot of anticipating” when she went on her first-ever overnight camp with the Mosaic Project four years ago.

“I think having Mosaic closer to where most of the schools are [located] would make a big impact because not only is it easier to get there, but then on the first day there’s more time for doing ‘get to know you’ activities, and there’s time on the last day for people to say their goodbyes,” Russell said.

Russell plans to return to Mosaic in the fall as a youth leader.

“It’s a little bit hard to understand why people don’t want Mosaic in their community, just because of how much it helps people,” she said.

Mendel said the rental locations also create unsustainable commutes for the staff, who mostly live in the East Bay.

“We go away for six weeks, and people give up their life for this,” she said. “We’ve lost amazing staff because they fall in love and they want a family and they can’t be leaving for six, seven weeks a session.”

A permanent location in Castro Valley would keep the program going in the long term, she said.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Player sponsored by