The cameras are located along high-injury corridors, the 6% of Oakland streets that account for 60% of severe and fatal collisions. City officials said every week, two Oaklanders are killed or seriously injured in a traffic collision and that these crashes disproportionately impact people of color, seniors, children and people with disabilities.
San Francisco, the first city to implement the pilot, has reported dramatic reductions in speeding drivers at 33 automated speed camera locations since the cameras first went online last March, according to an initial evaluation by the SFMTA. That study of 15 camera locations in the city showed an average 72% reduction in speeding vehicles 6 months after the cameras were first installed.
George Spies, a co-organizer with Traffic Violence Rapid Response, a pedestrian safety organization based in Oakland, told KQED he supports the automated speed cameras, but said the most effective way to reduce vehicle speeds is to redesign streets to make them slower and safer.
“ We don’t want to see any city use automated speed cameras as an excuse not to proceed as quickly and as forcefully as possible with making streets safer through infrastructural change,” Spies said.
Spies added that he believes automated speed enforcement removes bias that may be present when a police officer conducts a traffic stop.
“ We don’t want to see that kind of enforcement continue because it leads to all sorts of really problematic outcomes,” Spies said.