upper waypoint

California Eviction Moratorium Stays, Even as Judge Strikes Down Federal Ruling

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Demonstrators hold signs that read "Evictions = Death" in front of the Capitol in Sacramento.
Demonstrators calling for lawmakers and Gov. Gavin Newsom to pass rent forgiveness and stronger eviction protections legislation, gather in front of the Capitol in Sacramento on Jan. 25, 2021. (Rich Pedroncelli/AP)

A federal judge has issued a sweeping ruling that would revoke a pandemic eviction moratorium put in place by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a decision the Justice Department is appealing on behalf of the CDC.

The ruling could have huge ramifications on millions of tenants struggling to pay rent during the pandemic, but it doesn’t directly impact states like California that have passed their own moratoriums.

"This ruling is focused on the agency's authority at the federal level and doesn't say anything about what a state has its powers to do over eviction," said Shamus Roller, executive director of the San Francisco-based National Housing Law Project.

In California, a statewide moratorium in place until the end of June prevents anyone with a pandemic-related hardship from being evicted for nonpayment of rent.

Some local cities and counties — like Oakland and San Francisco — go even further, where nearly all evictions are on hold unless there’s a health and safety risk, or if the landlord pulls the rental off the market.

"It has no impact on either state or local eviction moratoriums in California. Those remain and are no less legally sound because of this ruling," Roller said.

The case was brought by the Alabama Association of Realtors, which argued that the CDC doesn't have the power to tell landlords they can't evict people during a pandemic. The judge agreed.

"It is the role of the political branches, and not the courts, to assess the merits of policy measures designed to combat the spread of disease, even during a global pandemic," Judge Dabney Friedrich of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia wrote in her ruling.

"The question for the Court is a narrow one: Does the Public Health Service Act grant the CDC the legal authority to impose a nationwide eviction moratorium? It does not."

That act empowers the CDC to make and enforce regulations that it judges are necessary to prevent "the introduction, transmission, or spread of communicable diseases." But the judge said in this case the CDC overreached.

There have been several rulings on the matter with conflicting decisions. This latest one goes further than any of them by moving to strike down the eviction moratorium nationwide.

Sponsored

But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit could now issue a stay, which would keep the CDC's eviction protections in place, for now.

"My hope is that the D.C. Circuit Court will quickly issue a stay, and this ruling will not have effect," said Roller.

"The underlying ruling in this case is pretty weak, in my opinion," Roller said. "Congress in December extended the CDC order. So clearly Congress thinks that the CDC has this authority."

But Roller said it's unclear whether the appeals court will issue a stay and which way the appellate decision may go. He said the Trump administration appointed many conservative federal judges who he suspects could rule against the government exerting this kind of power — telling landlords not to evict tenants during a public health emergency.

"It'll be a three-judge panel that will review this," Roller said. "It will depend greatly on which three judges get selected."

Meanwhile, the plaintiff in this latest case, the Alabama Association of Realtors, said it's pleased by the ruling.

The group's CEO, Jeremy Walker, said, "The ruling will bring much needed relief to struggling mom-and-pop housing providers across the country." He said the economy is growing again and getting back on its feet.

"Our focus is now on the implementation of emergency rental assistance to support tenants who continue to suffer from the effects of the pandemic as soon as possible," Walker said.

The U.S. Census Bureau says nearly 7 million Americans are still behind on rent. And while Congress has authorized about $50 billion in rental assistance money, the vast majority of it hasn't reached the people who need it yet.

So housing groups say that without the CDC order in place, many families will get evicted who might otherwise have avoided it. They worry these families could wind up homeless, just because they lost work during the worst pandemic in a century.

This story includes reporting from NPR's Chris Arnold and KQED's Molly Solomon.

Copyright 2021 NPR. To see more, visit https://www.npr.org.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
How Have Wage Increases Affected Fast Food Workers?SFSU President Begins Negotiations With Campus Gaza ProtestersUC Berkeley Opens Civil Rights Investigation Into Confrontation at Dean’s HomeSmall Houses Pose Solution to Housing CrisisIt’s a 408 vs. 510 Showdown as San Jose Earthquakes Take on Oakland RootsA Family Fled Ethnic Violence in India. Its Echoes Resonate in the Bay AreaCalifornia Groundwater Surges After Torrential Rain and SnowstormsWho Owns the Apartment Next Door? California Agency Says it Will Take Millions to Find OutAmor Towles on his New Short Story Collection 'Table for Two'SFMOMA’s New Collaboration with Artists with Disabilities