upper waypoint

S.F. Adopts Tougher Parking Penalties for Scooter Parking Violations

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

A LimeBike scooter parked on San Francisco's New Montgomery Street in April.  (Dan Brekke/KQED)

Updated Wednesday, June 20, to reflect the SFMTA board's unanimous passage of higher scooter parking fines.

Sometime this month or next, San Francisco transportation officials will issue permits to as many as five firms to operate electric stand-up rental scooters in the city.

But even before those permits are awarded, the city is signaling it will get tough on companies that don't make sure their scooters are properly parked.

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency board approved new rules Tuesday that would increase penalties for repeat parking offenses.

The scooter parking penalties would go from a flat $100 per violation to $100 for the first ticket in a 12-month period, $200 for a second offense and $500 for the third and every subsequent citation. The fines would be assessed against scooter companies, not individual riders.


Three companies -- Bird, LimeBike and Spin -- distributed scooters on the city's streets in March just after the Board of Supervisors began discussing steps to regulate the machines.

Amid the ensuing public uproar, many complaints focused on the tendency of some riders to dump their scooters just anywhere instead of parking them out of the way of pedestrians.

The Board of Supes subsequently passed an ordinance making it illegal for the scooter firms to operate without a permit. Thus the creation of the SFMTA's permit process.

The agency plans to grant permits to as many as five companies to operate a total of 1,250 scooters citywide in the initial phase of its 12-month pilot project. The agency could allow the number of scooters to double after the first six months of the pilot, which is designed to allow the city to gather data on the vehicles' use and test the companies' ability to develop parking solutions.

A staff memo prepared for Tuesday's SFMTA board meeting said the higher parking penalties are designed to ensure the scooter firms comply with city regulations.

"Meaningful enforcement is an important part of an effective permit program," the memo says. "And the ability to impose increased penalties for repeated violations will improve SFMTA’s ability to ensure compliance" with permit rules.

Ed Reiskin, the city's director of transportation, told board members Tuesday that higher fines arose from comments the SFMTA heard while developing the pilot project "that the fees that were originally proposed were too low and might be seen as a cost of doing business for a scofflaw company."

A total of 12 companies filed permit applications by the June 7 deadline -- including firms like Uber and Lyft that have not previously operated scooter programs.

Among the three companies that launched in the city in March, Bird was most aggressive in deploying its vehicles and has criticized the city's cap on the number of scooters to be deployed during the pilot project.

The Southern California-based firm was operating more than 2,000 scooters in San Francisco by late May and has argued that the city should adopt what it calls a "dynamic cap" -- essentially allowing each firm to decide how many machines to place on the streets based on demand.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Federal Judge Orders New Sentencing Hearing for David DePape in Trial Over Pelosi AttackSome Bay Area Universities Reach Deal to End Encampments, but Students Say Their Fight ContinuesAfter Months-Long Coma, This Latino Immigrant Worker Is Still Fighting Mysterious Long COVID SymptomsCalifornia Promised Health Care Workers a Higher Minimum Wage — but Will Newsom Delay It?David DePape Sentenced to 30 Years in Federal Prison for Attack on Nancy Pelosi's HusbandNewsom Says California Water Tunnel Will Cost $20 Billion. Officials and Experts Say It's Worth ItEighth-Grader's Call to 911 About Teacher's Outburst Causes StirFree Key Choir: 'What's in a Name'Antisemitism Is on the Rise, but Defining It Is Harder Than Condemning ItImpact of California Fast Food Worker Wage Increase Still Too Early to Gauge