upper waypoint

S.F. Transportation Officials to Vote on 'Parking for God' Pilot Program

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

On Sundays, Cornerstone Church's volunteer parking attendants help their members double-park on Guerrero Street between 17th and 18th streets. When services are finished around 1:30 p.m., they call SFMTA to ticket anyone still parked in the street. (Jeremy Raff/KQED)

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency is considering formalizing part of an informal accommodation for Sunday worshipers on city streets: widespread illegal parking.

Dolores Street is one of many city thoroughfares where that religious favor collides with parking regulations each weekend.

For decades, churchgoers -- along with synagogue-goers, shoppers and others -- have clogged Dolores Street by parking along its median on a four-block stretch between 14th and 18th streets.

“I would call it a traditional accommodation,” Carlos Jimenez told KQED's Bay Curious last year. Jimenez is a pastoral staff member at Cornerstone Church on 17th Street. “I don’t think anyone can point to where that started. Many people have asked if it’s formal. It is not formal, but it’s something the city has always accommodated churches.”

The San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency doesn't staff as many enforcement officers on weekends, so it only issues tickets if it receives a complaint.

Sponsored

But that could change if the SFMTA Board of Directors approves a staff recommendation and green lights a year-long pilot that would legalize some median parking on Dolores Street. The Board is scheduled to vote on the proposal at its meeting on Tuesday.

"It is something that the community has clearly been concerned about," said John Knox White, SFMTA's program manager.

He said much of the concern came from residents and business owners who felt like churchgoers were getting special treatment. The proposed pilot could address those issues by formalizing where and when it's legal for any car to park along the median.

Last May, the SFMTA convened the Guerrero/Dolores Median Parking Policy Advisory Committee made up of neighborhood religious leaders, business owners and residents to investigate the issue and recommend a solution to SFMTA staff. At its final meeting last February, the group voted 4-3 against any further median parking.

Elizabeth Zitrin, who was on the committee, said the committee was under the impression that its recommendation at the February meeting would be the recommendation made to the SFMTA Board of Directors. She said in an email that she will be at the meeting on Tuesday to "speak to the failure of the legitimate process and the determination of SFMTA to reach the conclusion they wanted from the beginning by completely ignoring and dismissing the opinion of the people and their own process."

Zitrin cited an online survey the SFMTA and the committee commissioned, which found that 74 percent of residents supported a full ban on median parking. In the same survey, 95 percent of worshippers said they opposed such a ban.

Knox White said the same rift was present on the committee with residents wanting to end illegal median parking while religious leaders and business owners advocating formally allowing it on weekends.

“We’ve really tried to listen to everybody in the community and come up with some sort of compromise,” Knox White said.

The SFMTA is still working on developing a recommendation for how to deal with median parking on nearby Guerrero Street. Knox White said the difficulty in producing plans for just these two streets makes it unlikely that the Dolores Street plan, if approved, would be used as a blueprint to combat median parking throughout the city.

"Every street is really unique and different," he said.

However, Knox White said the process of working with different stakeholders is a solid model that could be used on future projects.

"We have a way of bringing people together and looking at data and trying to find what I feel is a fair compromise position that really brings the majority voices of the stakeholders from all sides to a place where probably nobody is getting everything they want but everybody is getting something, and we're getting to a better place," he said.

If the Board of Directors gives the go-ahead on Tuesday, Knox White said he expects to have a final proposal for the Dolores Street pilot back before the Board within six months.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Stunning Archival Photos of the 1906 Earthquake and FireCould Protesters Who Shut Down Golden Gate Bridge Be Charged With False Imprisonment?San Francisco Sues Oakland Over Plan to Change Airport NameDeath Doula Alua Arthur on How and Why to Prepare for the EndAlameda County DA Charges 3 Police Officers With Manslaughter in Death of Mario GonzalezAfter Parole, ICE Deported This Refugee Back to a Country He Never KnewDespite Progress, Black Californians Still Face Major Challenges In Closing Equality GapGaza Aid Flotilla to Include Bay Area ResidentsSF’s Equity Program Fails to Address Racial Disparities in Cannabis IndustryHow to Create Your Own ‘Garden Wonderland’