- Home
- California Voter Guide
- Proposition 27
Proposition 27
Should California legalize online sports betting?
Proposition 27 would allow Californians to place bets online. Gambling companies, which are backing the measure, would have to partner with a California Indian tribal government to launch their app. Betting platforms would be required to pay 10% of gaming revenue to the state. After subtracting regulatory costs, 85% of revenue would be earmarked for local governments to combat homelessness, and 15% of the revenue would go to tribes that are not offering online sports betting. Voters can vote “yes” or “no” on both Proposition 26 and Proposition 27 — if both pass, the dispute could head to the courts.
Passes with a majority vote.
99% precincts reporting0% of votes countedAssociated PressThis percentage is an Associated Press estimate of how much of the vote in an election has been counted. It is informed by turnout in recent elections, details on votes cast in advance and – after polls close – early returns. The estimate may fluctuate as election officials report additional results and AP learns more about how many voters have cast a ballot.
Yes Argument
Online sports wagering has proven far more popular than betting at brick-and-mortar casinos, which means Proposition 27 will bring in far more money than Proposition 26 for state and local governments. California’s Legislative Analyst’s Office estimates that Proposition 27 could bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in revenue, much of which would be dedicated to a top priority: housing and services for the homeless. This would create a steady stream of funding to help the unhoused, one that is not subject to budget booms and busts.
No Argument
Proposition 27 would allow out-of-state gambling companies to reap the benefits of legalized sports betting. Only a handful of California’s Native American Indian tribes will be able to partner with gambling companies, and those tribes must give up some sovereign rights and submit to the regulation of the state over online gambling activities. Plus, researchers are concerned about the greater health risks posed by the accessibility of internet gambling.
Key SupportersThis list represents notable organizations and officials who have taken a position on the ballot measure, or who are funding the campaigns in support or in opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.This list represents notable organizations and officials who have taken a position on the ballot measure, or who are funding the campaigns in support or in opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.
Key OpponentsThis list represents notable organizations and officials who have taken a position on the ballot measure, or who are funding the campaigns in support or in opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.This list represents notable organizations and officials who have taken a position on the ballot measure, or who are funding the campaigns in support or in opposition. This list is not exhaustive, and may be updated.
FundraisingCampaign finance data comes from the California Secretary of State’s office and our partners at Voter’s Edge.Campaign finance data comes from the California Secretary of State’s office and our partners at Voter’s Edge.
Source: California Secretary of State
$169.3mTotal
$35.0m
$34.3m
$25.0m
$25.0m
$25.0m
$237.7mTotal
$103.2m
$30.4m
$30.1m
$22.9m
$10.4m
More California Propositions
Proposition 1
Proposition 26
Proposition 28
