upper waypoint

Why This Bay Area Senator Was the Sole No Vote on Newsom's Clean Water Plan

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

California State Senator Bob Wieckowski in Sacramento on May 15, 2017. (Bert Johnson/KQED)

Bob Wieckowski stands alone. 

He was the only state senator to vote against Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to clean up dirty drinking water in the California’s poorest communities, which passed the Senate in a 38-1 vote on Monday.

The bill — SB 200 — passed the Assembly last week without a single vote in opposition.

To be clear, Wieckowski thinks clean water is an important priority. His quibble is that California will pay for it with revenue generated from the state’s cap-and-trade auction.

His argument: money in the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund (GGRF) is supposed to be spent on, well, reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 

“Diverting limited GGRF dollars away from cutting greenhouse gas emissions to other important causes, is not a path we should go down now or in the future,” Wieckowski said in a speech on the Senate floor.

“Members, we are falling farther behind in our commitment to meeting the Paris Accord,” he said. “We should not be creating a false dichotomy that is a by-product of this deal – pitting clean air against clean water. We know all Californians can, and must, have both.”

The bill includes $100 million from the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund and another $33 million from the general fund to be spent on rebuilding broken drinking water infrastructure in unincorporated communities and small towns across the state. 

And it’s not a one-time money diversion. The bill also seeks to use 5% of California’s cap-and-trade proceeds, up to $130 million annually, for clean water projects until 2030.

Earlier this year, the governor proposed a tax on all Californians’ water bills that would fund programs to clean up the dirty water, and in January, Newsom and his cabinet visited Monterey Park Tract in Ceres, a Central Valley city with contaminated wells, to highlight the issue.

But the Legislature didn’t approve the plan, as some lawmakers worried that their constituents would object to a new monthly tax at a time when the state is enjoying a budget surplus.

The bill hasn’t reached Newsom’s desk yet, but he will have 12 days to sign it, when it does.

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
California’s New 1600-Acre State Park Set to Open This SummerHomeowners Insurance Market Stretched Even Thinner as 2 More Companies Leave CaliforniaSame-Sex Couples Face Higher Climate Change Risks, New UCLA Study ShowsHoping for a 2024 'Super Bloom'? Where to See Wildflowers in the Bay AreaEver Wake Up Frozen in the Middle of the Night, With a Shadowy Figure in the Room?These Face Mites Really Grow on YouSchizophrenia: What It's Like to Hear VoicesThis is NOT a Dandelion.Do Little Earthquakes Mean the Big One Is Close at Hand?Where to See Cherry Blossoms in the Bay Area This Spring