“The benefits to Spingola resulted in a benefit to Davis,” Jenkins said. “They have lived together since 2015, have multiple shared bank accounts at two banks, and Spingola also wrote monthly rent checks to their landlord from the bank account where his Collective Impact paycheck was deposited. They also traveled together and paid for one another’s flights and hotel stays.”
Multiple city investigations have laid out corruption charges against Davis and revealed that the Human Rights Commission had misspent at least $4 million under her leadership. In the fall, the city’s public ethics watchdogs revealed Davis accepted flight upgrades, vacation rentals, support for personal business ventures, a portrait of herself and other gifts totaling nearly $40,000 from nonprofits that received large contracts and payments from the HRC.
In the wake of the scandal, more than 30 arts and culture organizations were left in the lurch after the city canceled their funding last spring.
“This is certainly a lesson for the city that there has to be an infrastructure of checks and balances to ensure that things like this don’t happen,” Jenkins said Monday, adding that her office’s investigation into Davis and Spingola is ongoing.
Tony Brass, Davis’ attorney, said he had “a lot of questions” to be answered during the discovery phase, adding that Davis had disclosed her relationship with Collective Impact and had sought oversight and resources from the city attorney’s office.
“The city recruited somebody from Collective Impact to run the city department, and then now we’re shocked that she had conflicts of interest with Collective Impact. I mean, it’s actually just, you know, it’s really nonsensical,” Brass said.
Jen Kwart, a spokesperson for the city attorney’s office, said the office plans to suspend Davis, Spingola and Collective Impact from bidding on or receiving new city contracts, and it will continue its appeal of an administrative decision in October to allow the nonprofit to keep operating.
“James Spingola and Collective Impact were not responsible contractors that could be trusted with public money,” she said in an email.