“We have serious concerns about any funding cuts that would harm HIV and AIDS prevention and care, but in particular ones that would cause disproportionate harm to communities that are already disenfranchised by existing health care systems,” said Tyler TerMeer, CEO of the San Francisco AIDS Foundation, in a statement. “We know that Black and African American people in San Francisco experience higher rates of HIV diagnoses than other communities — now is not the time to pull back on valuable investments made to improve health outcomes in these communities.”
Advocates criticizing the proposed cuts are calling on the city to push back against large San Francisco-based tech companies fighting business taxes. Companies such as Airbnb, Uber and Lyft are currently suing the city to claw back collectively over $300 million in taxes.
“Why should workers get laid off and residents lose essential services when big tech companies like Airbnb are holding up hundreds of millions of dollars, suing the city to get out of paying their fair share in taxes?” Worley-Ziegmann said. “Mayor Luire helped end the hotel strike and stopped a National Guard takeover with two phone calls. Maybe he should call these CEOs before asking workers and residents to foot the bill.”
While the funding from those cases, if resolved, would only provide one-time dollars, Worley-Ziegmann said it would buy the city time to address structural funding issues that still lie ahead. Proponents of the CEO tax likely headed before San Francisco voters this November say that funding generated from that proposal could offer longer-term solutions.
But critics and companies that filed the lawsuit say they were improperly taxed at a higher rate than warranted. Lurie, meanwhile, has said he does not support the proposals for a state wealth tax, saying it would drive out some of the largest tax-generating businesses.
“This is an excellent bridge plan to be able to use that funding while we work on longer-term solutions to the deficit,” Worley-Ziegmann said.