UC Regents Abandon Plan to Open Campus Jobs to Undocumented Students

The University of California regents voted Thursday to suspend consideration of a proposal that would have authorized the university to hire undocumented immigrant students who do not qualify for federal work authorization.

Instead, the regents offered an alternative plan that would expand educational opportunities modeled after the California College CORPS program. The program exchanges tuition remission for volunteer work.

“We have concluded that the proposed legal pathway is not viable at this time and, in fact, carries significant risk for the institution and for those we serve,” UC President Michael Drake announced at the regents meeting.

If it were approved and found in violation of federal law, Drake said the university could be subject to civil fines, criminal penalties or debarment from federal contracting. The board voted to table consideration of the proposal until next year.

Organizers of the campaign for undocumented student employment expressed outrage and sadness at the announcement.

“Why do we have the system of separate-but-equal when we have undocumented students struggling, and we have in our hands, ways to help them?” said Karely Amaya Rios, a graduate student of public policy at UCLA and lead organizer for the Opportunity for All campaign, which lobbied the regents to consider the hiring proposal.

The proposal relied on a legal theory (PDF) developed by the UCLA Center for Immigration Law and Policy and backed by 29 prominent legal scholars at other universities across the nation. It suggests that the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, a federal law that bars employers from hiring undocumented people without legal work authorization, does not apply to employment by state governments. That’s because the U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that “if a federal law does not mention the states explicitly, that federal law does not bind state government entities,” according to UCLA scholars.

Under this legal theory, the University of California could hire undocumented immigrant students for campus jobs, such as graduate researchers and teaching assistants.

“The only real [legal] risk the university has is the federal government can sue in court to try to stop the program from running,” said Ahilan Arulanantham, a UCLA Law professor who helped advance the legal theory. “Nobody is going to jail or getting fined.”

He argued that the regents have a moral obligation to expand work and education opportunities to all of the students.

There are 44,000 undocumented college students in California, including nearly 4,000 enrolled in the UC system.

Each year, an additional 14,000 undocumented students graduate high school in the state, but none can apply for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, an Obama-era work authorization program for unauthorized immigrants who came to the United States with their parents as children.

Though there are currently 545,000 people covered by DACA, in 2021, a federal judge in Texas ruled the program was unlawful and ordered the Biden Administration to stop accepting new applicants. The administration has appealed.

The state of California and the UC system have taken numerous steps over the years to support undocumented students, offering them in-state tuition, access to financial aid and free legal support. In 2017, the University of California sued the Trump Administration to prevent it from terminating DACA, a case that went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The student-led Opportunity for All campaign launched in the fall of 2022. It gained widespread support from both students and faculty. 

In a letter to the regents, faculty members urged the campus leaders to make good on their 2023 promise to implement a plan that would expand educational opportunities to all UC students regardless of immigration status. Nearly 500 faculty members vowed “to hire undocumented students into educational employment positions for which they are qualified for once given authority to do so by the UC.”

Last May, the UC Regents created a working group to consider the proposal and provide a path for implementation to University President Michael Drake. But after months of meetings, including with the leaders and legal scholars of the Opportunity for All campaign, the regents missed their self-imposed November deadline, with Drake citing legal concerns. 

“The legal considerations are numerous, and after several discussions with the stakeholders involved, we’ve concluded that it is in everyone’s best interest to continue to study the matter further,” Drake said during the November 17th regent meeting. 

Those legal concerns included pressure from the Biden Administration to reject the proposal, according to reports from POLITICO. 

Additional pushback came from Conservative legal scholars and one Republican lawmaker, who argued the university could risk losing federal funding. 

In a statement, UC officials said the university “engages with local, state, and federal partners on numerous issues concerning public education and for maintaining compliance with existing federal law.” 

Student advocates say they believe the university is afraid of being sued by Donald Trump if he were to be reelected president. 

“The UC is hiding behind an election year and is hiding behind the threat of right wing extremism,” said Jeffry Umaña Muñoz  an undergraduate student at UCLA and lead organizer of the Opportunity for All campaign. “When they have the power and the authority to stand up against it and sends a strong message, not just here in California, but across the country, that right wing extremism, that xenophobia can be defeated.”

Umaña Muñoz said he already participates in the California College CORPS. He says it’s not an equitable alternative to employment.

“It forces students to have to negotiate with financial aid on how much resources they’re eligible for,” said Umaña Muñoz.

He says the Opportunity for All campaign will continue pushing for employment for all undocumented university students.