Can landlords double, triple or even quadruple a tenant’s rent just to force them to leave?
Not in San Francisco.
Landlord and realtor groups lost a lawsuit on Friday which was seeking to overturn a city law passed in January 2019. That law bars landlords of single-family homes from raising a tenant’s rent to an exorbitant amount in order to “circumvent” eviction protections.
City Attorney Dennis Herrera hailed the decision as a win for tenants.
“It shocks the conscience to think a landlord would double or triple somebody’s rent to circumvent eviction regulations and force a tenant out. It’s predatory, and it’s not allowed in San Francisco,” Herrera said in a statement. “I’m pleased we were able to protect San Francisco’s common-sense regulations that prohibit this dangerous ploy — particularly given the economic and health threats we’re all facing.”
The law, authored by San Francisco Supervisor Hillary Ronen, says that any rent increase specifically intended to “defraud, intimidate, or coerce the tenant” into vacating a rental unit would qualify as tenant harassment.
Some tests of whether or not a rental increase constitutes harassment include rent increases “in excess of market rates for comparable units,” or if a rent increase came within six months after a landlord tried to evict a tenant.
The San Francisco Apartment Association, the San Francisco Association of Realtors and the Small Property Owners of San Francisco Institute sued to overturn the rent-hike ban a month after it was approved.
The San Francisco Apartment Association could not be reached for comment, and it is unclear if they will appeal the case. The San Francisco Association of Realtors did not immediately return a request for comment.
