upper waypoint

Phillips 66 Fined Again for Polluting San Pablo Bay

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The Phillips 66 oil refinery in the Contra Costa County town of Rodeo.  (Craig Miller/KQED)

For the third time in the last five years, Phillips 66 plans to pay to settle accusations that its Rodeo refinery released chlorine into San Pablo Bay.

State water regulators announced Wednesday that the Houston-based company will pay $80,000 for violating chlorine limits in water it released into the bay more than a dozen times over a five-month period last year.

Water regulators documented 16 instances during eight days between last July and November when chlorine was released from the facility, according to the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board's proposed settlement.

"Phillips 66 has a history of violations," the board wrote in this week's proposed settlement.

The company violated the agency's chlorine limits twice annually in 2014, 2015 and 2016, and was fined a total of $18,000 for those violations.


"This is looking more like a pattern," said Bill Johnson, who heads the board's division that focuses on enforcement and pollution reduction.

Phillips 66 uses chlorine as part of its refinery operations and it is required to remove all of the chemical before it's released into the bay.

"Because there are so many of them across so many days we really want to send a message," Johnson said.

"Chlorine is a problem for aquatic life. We need to control the chlorine concentrations that are discharged in order to keep the fish and other aquatic life protected," Johnson said, adding that his agency did not see any dead fish in the area because of the releases.

State water regulators say Phillips 66 worked to fix the problem and reduce chlorine levels in the refinery's water releases.

But the board found that company crews did not address the root cause of the violations. Investigators found that the refinery did an "insufficient" job of mixing in bisulfite into the water to remove chlorine from its discharges.

"They are a major discharger capable of doing a better job," Johnson said.

An environmental organization that advocates for the health of San Francisco Bay said the refinery's violations represent a threat to the region's ecology.

"These chlorine discharges are very serious for fish and other aquatic life in the area," said Erica Maharg, managing attorney at San Francisco Baykeeper. "We don't want polluting and paying a fine to be a regular cost of business for Phillips 66."

Maharg also raised concern about the refinery's track record in recent years.

In September 2016, a crude oil spill near the facility's marine terminal caused an overpowering odor that sickened Vallejo residents.

"Phillips 66 has not been a good neighbor to the community and to the bay," Maharg said.

A Phillips 66 spokeswoman did not respond to a request for comment.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why California Environmentalists Are Divided Over Plan to Change Power Utility RatesAngela Davis and Black Student Leaders Talk Social Justice at Alameda High School EventWhy Renaming Oakland's Airport Is a Big DealCalifornia Court to Weigh In on Fight Over Transgender Ballot Measure Proposal LanguageBay Area Indians Brace for India’s Pivotal 2024 Election: Here’s What to KnowHow a Pivotal Case on Homelessness Could Redefine Policies in California and the NationDespite California's Investments in Public Preschool, Child Care Challenges ContinueB. Hamilton: 'Hey Sunshine'Have We Entered Into a New Cold War Era?Inheriting a Home in California? Here's What You Need to Know