Now, they’re back. And so is the controversy.
“This is part and parcel of an anti-immigrant agenda by the Trump administration,” said Marielena Hincapié, the executive director of the National Immigration Law Center. “This fits squarely within its overall strategy of instilling fear and chaos among immigrant workers.”
The Social Security Administration insists it is trying to improve the accuracy of its records.
“If we cannot match the name and SSN reported on a W-2 to our records, we cannot credit earnings to a worker’s record,” said spokesman Mark Hinkle in a written statement. “When earnings are missing, the worker may not qualify for Social Security benefits he or she is due or the benefit amount may be incorrect.”
The agency declined an interview request. Its written statement doesn’t mention immigration at all. But immigration hard-liners say they are glad to see no-match letters return.
“If an employee is using a stolen Social Security number, we think it’s important for relevant people to know,” said Dan Stein, president of the Federation for American Immigration Reform, which advocates for lower levels of immigration. Stein says he has no sympathy for undocumented immigrants who are using fake Social Security numbers to work or for employers who have been looking the other way.
“Illegal immigration is ultimately everybody’s problem,” Stein said. “And one of the reasons why we’ve seen it blow out of control in the last 30-some years is because employers have not been willing to do their fair share in ensuring that American jobs go to American workers.”
But employers say it’s not their job to enforce immigration laws.
“It’s a very fine line for employers to walk and not get in trouble on either side of the line,” said Pace, the lawyer. “That’s the catch-22 that you sometimes see.”
When no-match letters went out before, Pace asked for guidance from immigration authorities and from Justice Department lawyers, she says. And she got two different answers.
Immigration authorities said employers should look at these letters as evidence that their employees are undocumented. But the Justice Department said not so fast: If you fire a worker based just on this letter, that could be discrimination.
“Sometimes I would get both agencies on the phone at once so they could try to get on the same page with direction on that,” Pace said. “Because they gave different direction from each agency.”
This time around, the Social Security Administration has changed the wording on no-match letters to clearly say this is not about immigration:
IMPORTANT: This letter does not imply that you or your employee intentionally gave the government wrong information about the employee’s name or SSN. This letter does not address your employee’s work authorization or immigration status. You should not use this letter to take any adverse action against an employee, such as laying off, suspending, firing, or discriminating against that individual, just because his or her SSN or name does not match our records. Any of those actions could, in fact, violate State or Federal law and subject you to legal consequences.
Still, Pace has a feeling that some employers will overreact anyway. She has seen it happen before.