upper waypoint

Paycheck Propositions: What Oakland Teachers Want Versus What the District Is Offering

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Proposed salary-increase scenarios.

All graphics by KQED's Elena Lacey

Oakland teachers, who are heading into the seventh day of a strike on Friday, haven’t had a contract — or a raise — since their last one expired in July 2017.

That’s why the teachers union is demanding that any new contract be retroactive to cover the 2017-2018 school year. The union is asking for a 12 percent total raise over three years, starting in 2017.

The district, which had initially offered a 5 percent increase over three years, announced its latest offer on Wednesday: an 8 percent increase over three years starting January 2019, plus a one-time 2 percent bonus (up from the 7 percent increase and 1.5 percent bonus it had offered the week before).

Keep in mind that each year’s increase is compounded, which means that the percentage increase is based on whatever the salary was the previous year (not the original salary). Also, remember that a school year is usually August through June.


The math begins to get confusing pretty fast, though, once you start adding up percentages. So we’re going to lay out, side by side, the three proposals that have been floated so far.

Here’s the teachers union’s proposal:

  • 2017-2018: 3% increase
  • 2018-2019: 4% increase
  • 2019-2020: 5% increase

So ... let’s say Mr. Jones, a high school math teacher with 10 years under his belt, currently makes the average Oakland Unified School District teaching salary of about $63,000 per year. Under this proposal, here’s what his salary increase per year would look like:

  • 2017-2018 (retroactively): $63,000 + (3% of $63,000) = $64,890
  • 2018-2019: $103 + (4% of $64,890) = $67,485
  • 2019-2020: $107.12 + (5% of $107.12) = $70,859

The union says this is a fair rate of increase, given the comparatively low salaries Oakland teachers make and the very high cost of living in the Bay Area. (Average rent in Oakland is $2,624, while the median home value is $735,100, according to RentCafe and Zillow, respectively.) Pay increases, the union argues, should meet or exceed the yearly change in the consumer price index, a measure of price changes associated with the cost of living, which in the Bay Area, one of the most expensive places to live in the country, averaged 3.2 percent in 2017 and 3.9 percent in 2018.

But the district, which is trying to cut next year’s budget by more than $20 million, says it can’t swing that big a pay bump for its 3,000 teachers, nurses and counselors. Initially, the district offered teachers a 5 percent raise over three years, less than half of what they wanted.

The week before teachers went on strike, a neutral fact-finder weighed in. He agreed that the financially strained district couldn’t afford the 12 percent increase over three years that teachers were asking for, but he also noted that the 5 percent bump the district had initially offered would fail to keep pace with inflation. The fact-finder suggested a compromise of a 6 percent pay increase over just two years (not three), beginning in July 2017. The third year would be left open to reconsideration, with the hope that additional state funding would become available to continue the same rate of increase. That proposal looks like this:

  • 2017-2018: 3% increase
  • 2018-2019: 3% increase
  • 2019-2020: Reconsider increased rate

So, under this proposal, here’s how Mr. Jones’ salary would increase:

  • 2017-2018: $63,000 + (3% of $63,000) = $64,890
  • 2018-2019: $103 + (3% of $64,890) = $66,837
  • 2019-2020: Reconsider

The teachers union said the fact-finder's proposal, while better than the district’s initial proposal of 5 percent over three years, still didn’t go far enough.

In last-minute negotiations with the union on the day before the strike started, the district made a counteroffer to increase teachers' pay by 7 percent over three years, starting in January 2019.

In a Feb. 20 press release, the district said: “Overall, OUSD’s proposal either meets or exceeds the recommendations provided by the fact-finder’s report. For example, the report recommends a 6 percent on-going raise while the district’s proposal is a 7 percent on-going increase and a 1.5 percent bonus.”

But that claim is highly debatable.

For one, it's a tricky apples-to-apples comparison to make, because the district's proposed schedule of increases is different from that proposed by the union and the fact-finder. Here’s how it would break down:

2017-2018: 1.5% bonus (that means a one-time deal, not part of the pay schedule).

  • Jan. 2019 - Dec. 2019: 3%
  • Jan. 2020 - Dec. 2020: 2%
  • Jan. 2021 - June 2021: 1%
  • Starting July 1, 2021: 1%

So for Mr. Jones, that would look like this:

  • 2017-2018: $945 + $63,000 = $63,945
  • Jan. 2019 - Dec. 2019: $63,000 + (3% of $63,000)= $64,890
  • Jan. 2020 - Dec. 2020: $64,890 + (2% of $64,890) = $66,188
  • Jan. 2021 - June 2021: $105.06 + (1% of $105.06) = $66,850
  • Starting July 1, 2021: $106.11 + (1% of $106.11) = $67,518

The latest district offer, announced Wednesday, ups the ante to 8 percent over three years and a 2 percent bonus.

The graph below shows both offers (using a hypothetical increase schedule for the latter one, because the specifics of it have not yet been announced).

“It depends on how you look at it,” said OUSD spokesman John Sasaki, when asked how the district’s proposal compared with the fact-finder's recommendation. “They had 6 percent for two years. We had 7 percent over three, guaranteed, plus the bonus. Straight numbers guaranteed, it’s more. [But] admittedly over a longer time.”

Johanna Langill, a ninth-grade math teacher at Oakland Technical High School, is still not pleased with the district’s latest offer. She said they tried to make it sound much better than it really is.

“It’s sneaky,” she said, while standing on the picket line in front of her school. “We are asking for literally the minimum to stay even with inflation, and they're still not close. So I think it’s pretty insulting.”

She added: “Really what they’re trying to do is lock us into a below-inflation rate of increase for the first year of our next contract.”

Langill said she feels a responsibility as a math teacher to clearly break it down, and is excited to teach a lesson on it to her students — whenever the strike ends.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Carnaval San Francisco 2024: From the Parade Route to Parking, Here's What to Know‘My Octopus Teacher’ Filmmaker on Connecting to Our Wild SelvesPollster Sounding the Alarm About RFK Jr.'s Presidential CampaignAll You Can Eat: Yes, the Bay Area Does Have a Late Night Dining SceneEver Seen A Koi Fish on the Sidewalk? Artist Explains Hidden MeaningKQED Cuts 34 Positions Amid Budget ShortfallCOVID Is Rising in Bay Area Wastewater Again. Why?UC Academic Workers’ Strike is Limited to Santa Cruz So Far. Here’s WhyState Supreme Court to Decide Fate of Prop. 22 … and the Gig EconomySeveral Family Resource Centers to Close Across Santa Clara County