upper waypoint

Proposition 5: Voters Reject Expanded Property Tax Benefits for Seniors

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

 (Creative Commons)

Voters have defeated Proposition 5, a California ballot measure that would have allowed homeowners 55 and older to keep their tax bills low if they sold their home and bought a new one in another California county.

Proposition 5 would have expanded property tax benefits first enacted in 1978 with the passage of Proposition 13, a landmark measure that ushered in an era of anti-tax, smaller government crusading throughout the country. Under Proposition 13, property tax rates were set at 1 percent of a property's sale price, with annual increases limited to no more than 2 percent a year. That continues until the property is sold, and it's reassessed and taxed based on the purchase price.

In the decade after Proposition 13 passed, voters approved two other ballot measures to make that tax benefit more portable, allowing homeowners 55 and older to apply their lower tax bill to a new home purchased in any county, if that county allowed it. Fewer than a dozen of California's 58 counties currently do.

Proposition 5 was placed on the ballot by the California Association of Realtors (CAR), with help from the national affiliate. Backers spent about $6 million to put the measure before voters, but then went silent. Unlike other ballot measures with their dueling TV ads for and against, voters had little awareness of a campaign for or against Proposition 5.

Sponsored

Realtors said their ballot measure would have allowed seniors to afford to move, freeing up larger homes for families with children. But critics said Proposition 5 was a tax giveaway to homeowners who didn't need it, while doing nothing to help others wanting to buy their first home.

Local governments also opposed it, fearing the loss of property tax revenue that the legislative analyst said would eventually rise to $1 billion a year.

But another measure to tinker with Proposition 13 is already on the horizon. A measure to remove commercial property from the protections of Proposition 13, creating a so-called split roll, has qualified for the November 2020 ballot.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Why California Environmentalists Are Divided Over Plan to Change Power Utility RatesWhy Renaming Oakland's Airport Is a Big DealAllegations of Prosecutorial Bias Spark Review of Death Penalty Convictions in Alameda CountyCecil Williams, Legendary Pastor of Glide Church, Dies at 94Nurses Warn Patient Safety at Risk as AI Use Spreads in Health CareSF Democratic Party’s Support of Unlimited Housing Could Pressure Mayoral CandidatesBay Area Indians Brace for India’s Pivotal 2024 Election: Here’s What to Know‘Sweeps Kill’: Bay Area Homeless Advocates Weigh in on Pivotal US Supreme Court CaseCalifornia’s Future Educators Divided on How to Teach ReadingWhen Rivers Caught Fire: A Brief History of Earth Day