upper waypoint

3. The Trials of Marvin Mutch: The People v. Mutch

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Headed for trial in early 1975, Marvin Mutch was confident he'd be found not guilty for the murder of Cassie Riley. There was no direct evidence linking him to the killing, and footprints found around Riley's body didn't match the size or style of his shoes.

But the prosecution had a strategy that relied on a complex interpretation of indirect -- or circumstantial -- evidence. That narrative put Mutch at the scene near the time of the murder and implied that he'd come home soaking wet the night Cassie Riley was drown in a shallow creek.

Mutch's sister, Valerie, was the linchpin in the case against her brother. She had inadvertently told police that Mutch had come home with wet clothes sometime around the day of the murder, but she wasn't sure which day.

The prosecution took extreme steps to preserve Valerie Mutch's testimony and made her unavailable to the defense. The truth about Valerie's role in the case against Marvin Mutch wouldn't make it to the jury, and it would take decades to finally be revealed.


lower waypoint
next waypoint
5 Takeaways from the 1st San Francisco Mayoral Candidate DebateWhat to Expect When Enrolling Your Child in Transitional KindergartenWhy Some Bay Area Counties May Lose Millions Over an Obscure Legal Fight With the State6 Months After People’s Park Closure, Many Former Residents and Supporters Struggle to AdjustWhy These Queer Pro-Palestinian Advocates Are Calling for a Boycott of SF PrideHow Much Will It Cost You to Keep California's Last Nuclear Plant Running?California Poised to Slash Health Care Workforce Funding Amid Labor ShortagesHow The Closure Of Madera County's Only Hospital Has Impacted The CommunityA Berkeley Mother's Memoir Offers a Candid Commentary on the Crisis of MasculinityDoctors, Community Leaders Ramp Up Efforts to Halt Closure of East San José Trauma Center