upper waypoint

3. The Trials of Marvin Mutch: The People v. Mutch

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Headed for trial in early 1975, Marvin Mutch was confident he'd be found not guilty for the murder of Cassie Riley. There was no direct evidence linking him to the killing, and footprints found around Riley's body didn't match the size or style of his shoes.

But the prosecution had a strategy that relied on a complex interpretation of indirect -- or circumstantial -- evidence. That narrative put Mutch at the scene near the time of the murder and implied that he'd come home soaking wet the night Cassie Riley was drown in a shallow creek.

Mutch's sister, Valerie, was the linchpin in the case against her brother. She had inadvertently told police that Mutch had come home with wet clothes sometime around the day of the murder, but she wasn't sure which day.

The prosecution took extreme steps to preserve Valerie Mutch's testimony and made her unavailable to the defense. The truth about Valerie's role in the case against Marvin Mutch wouldn't make it to the jury, and it would take decades to finally be revealed.


lower waypoint
next waypoint
Your Guide to the 2024 San Francisco Chinese New Year ParadeIs the SMART Train Easing Highway 101 Traffic in Marin and Sonoma?Recall Supporters Disrupt Oakland Mayor’s Public Safety Grant AnnouncementOscar Grant's Cellphones Returned to His Mother, 15 Years After Notorious Police Killing on BART PlatformMassive Bird Flu Outbreak Severely Impacting Farms In Central ValleySan Francisco Appoints First Noncitizen to Serve on Elections CommissionAre Women to Blame If California Ends Up With 2 Male Senators?Hundreds of Protesters Crash Biden Fundraiser in SF, Demanding a Cease-Fire in GazaSeeing Madonna at SF's Chase Center? From Parking to Bag Policies and Parties, What to KnowCalifornia Bill Would Require Landlords to Accept Pets