Plastic Substance Created by Pollution Yields a New Word: Plastiglomerate

Save ArticleSave Article

Failed to save article

Please try again

Plastic on Laysan Island
Plastic is so widespread that it appears destined to make a worldwide layer in the geologic record. This is on Laysan Island, deep in the central Pacific Ocean. (US Fish & Wildlife Service/Flickr)

By now everyone knows the word "Anthropocene," a name pregnant with meanings. It uses the language of geological time divisions to suggest that the effects of modern civilization have made the Earth system itself operate differently. The Anthropocene has become a powerful hallmark of climate-change/global-warming rhetoric.

"Anthropocene" was coined in 2000 by an Earth scientist, Paul Crutzen, who was speaking to an audience of his peers. Geologists have always accepted its premise, for geological reasons—centuries of land-use changes and river damming really have altered the natural balance.

For several years a formal committee has been exploring whether to add an Anthropocene time unit to the end of the geological timeline, where the Holocene Epoch is today. Their work has meant a lot of head-scratching in the profession. Do we need the Anthropocene to do our work? What should its boundary be? How could we determine the boundary based on evidence in the field?

Geologists have always joked about the "Era of Broken Glass" among themselves. But in the open-access journal GSA Today, three researchers have described a substance that may well outlast humanity and remain in the rock record as a worldwide marker. It's a concrete-like rock made of plastic and sediment that they dub "plastiglomerate." The researchers are geologist Patricia Corcoran, artist Kelly Jazvac (both of University of Western Ontario) and marine researcher/activist Charles Moore (Algalita Marine Research Institute), and their field area was remote, plastic-littered Kamilo Beach in Hawaii.

Plastic effectively lasts forever, but it's not usually considered a geological material because it does eventually break down under sunlight and chemical action. It's lightweight and tends to avoid being buried, which would preserve it pretty much indefinitely. However, the researchers found that plastic can be densified by melting it and mixing it with beach sand and other crud, forming a conglomerate-type solid.


Just as particleboard acts like real wood, plastiglomerate acts like real rocks. The authors present photos showing some of its variety and divide it into two types. "In situ" plastiglomerate forms at Kamilo Beach when plastic, melted by campfires, infiltrates the lava bedrock there, and "clastic" plastiglomerate forms in lumps when melted plastic glues together sand, coral, woody bits and other crud.

Plastiglomerate types
An assortment of plastiglomerate types at Kamilo Beach. A, C and D are of the in situ type and B is the clastic type, mixing coral and lava chunks in a plastic matrix. Figure 2 of Corcoran et al. 2014, "An anthropogenic marker horizon in the future rock record."

This kind of thing could form on every coastline in the world, either from natural fires near the beach where vegetation traps windblown plastic or, of course, from human campfires. Because it is effectively a worldwide marker, rising seas could bury it and subsequent rock-forming processes could preserve it for geologists millions of years in the future, a robust sign of the Anthropocene Epoch—at least, its beginning.

I've followed the Anthropocene debate since it began, and there's a brain-twisting weirdness about it when we think about those future geologists. If future geologists are human, wouldn't they know about human history already? And if they were some other intelligent species, wouldn't they have their own geologic timescale? But it's productive to contemplate the present in new ways because it can help us better visualize the past. Much of geologic history is still mysterious, and we are surely as ignorant today as our scientific ancestors were in their day.

I think that for most geoscientists the particular question of whether the Anthropocene should go in the time scale doesn't matter. But science proceeds by sniffing down all sorts of trails that may or may not lead anywhere—it's the sniffing part that matters.