Here is a picture I took during a night
of observing on the summit of Mauna Kea in Hawaii.
The laser from inside the dome at the Keck telescope
creates an artificial star in the upper atmosphere
that is used for adaptive optics. I mentioned before that there is one major obstacle that prevents us from obtaining the best resolution possible from a ground-based telescope. The key word here is of course "ground-based", as opposed to "in-orbit."
Although it is quite convenient to build a telescope in a place we can actually visit, these locations have one major drawback. For the same reason that stars twinkle, any observations from the ground suffer from degraded resolution. Where we would be able to see the beautiful spiral arms and compact core of a distant galaxy in an ideal observation, we really see a blob that resembles a snowman as much as it does a galaxy.
The cause of this twinkling, or degradation, is the Earth's atmosphere. I like to think of the atmosphere as a boiling pot of chicken noodle soup. We are in the unfortunate position of sitting at the bottom of the pot, trying to look out through all the turbulence into the infinite kitchen. It's hard to tell exactly what's happening in the neighboring pots from this perspective, not to mention the pots that are 10 billion light years away.
There are two solutions to this problem; the most obvious (and most expensive) solution is to build a telescope that will be launched into space. I’m actually working on such a project and will write a bit about it next time. The other solution is a little more complicated, a technology known as adaptive optics.
Image courtesy of CFHTWe use adaptive optics to tilt the lenses and mirrors in a telescope to correct the twinkling of the stars or galaxies that we are trying to observe. If my galaxy twinkles left, the optics register this disturbance and compensate by tilting left. Galaxy twinkles right, tilt right. This feedback loop happens in real time, with more than 100 measurements of the atmospheric disturbances every second. After the observations are finished, we have an image with a resolution that can be 20 times better than an image without adaptive optics.