upper waypoint

Judge Orders Probe Into Reinstatement of Fired Oakland Police Officers

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

Oakland police on patrol.  (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)
Oakland police on patrol. (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images) (Justin Sullivan/Getty Images)

A federal judge is ordering a wide-ranging investigation into why two Oakland police officers disciplined for misconduct won their cases on appeal and got their jobs back. U.S. District Judge Thelton Henderson wrote that discipline is worthless if it is not carried out.

"Because imposition of discipline is meaningless if it is not final, the Monitor and the Court must consider whether discipline is upheld at the highest level, most often arbitration," wrote Henderson, whose order was issued Thursday.

He cited two cases. One was the recent reinstatement of Officer Robert Roche, who was fired for lobbing a tear gas canister into a crowd of Occupy Oakland protesters who were trying to help Iraq War veteran Scott Olsen in October 2011 after he'd been struck in the head by a police projectile.

Oakland has prevailed only three times out of the last 15 arbitration cases.


When an officer is fired by the police review board, the police union can appeal the decision by going to an arbitrator. That person then acts as a judge, hears both sides of the case and decides whether the officer can return to duty. Two weeks ago, arbitrator David Stiteler overturned the police department's termination of Roche and ordered him reinstated with back pay.

In 2011, Officer Hector Jimenez was also ordered back on the job by an arbitrator after being fired for shooting an unarmed suspect in the back.

This is not an uncommon problem, says Professor David Harris, an expert in police misconduct at the University of Pittsburgh School of Law.

"I hear this complaint almost more often than any other from police leaders. 'I fired the guy, he did this, I fired him and I got him back. I can't get rid of these officers,' " Harris said.

Sometimes the city does not build strong enough cases at arbitration hearings.

"If the city that is involved in these things does not put enough evidence in front of the arbitrator, the arbitrator has to come out for the police officer," Harris said.

It's rare that an arbitration decision can be overturned. But Oakland is in a unusual situation. Since 2003 the Oakland Police Department has been under court order to reform after the Riders police brutality case, in which four officers were accused of beating and framing suspects in West Oakland.

Henderson ordered court-appointed federal monitor Robert Warshaw to investigate why police review board decisions are being frequently overturned. The judge also questioned whether the city is providing adequate counsel and bringing the appropriate witnesses.

Judge Orders Investigation into Reinstated Oakland Police by KQED News

Tara Siler contributed to this report.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Protesters Shut Down I-880 Freeway in Oakland as Part of 'Economic Blockade' for GazaCalifornia Preschools Wrestle to Comply With State’s Tightened Suspension RulesSan Francisco’s New Parking Rules Set to Displace RV Community Near SF StateRecall of Alameda County District Attorney Pamela Price Qualifies for a VoteA New Bay Area Clásico? SF's El Farolito and Oakland Roots Set to Battle in HaywardForced Sterilization Survivors Undertake Own Healing After Feeling 'Silenced Again' by StateHalf Moon Bay Prepares to Break Ground on Farmworker HousingCalifornia Legislature Halts 'Science of Reading' Mandate, Prompting Calls for Thorough Revieware u addicted to ur phoneSilicon Valley Readies for Low-Simitian House Race Recount — but How Does It Work?