The commission president added that the lack of awareness has meant flights haven’t performed as well as they could, leading to a loss of routes and a reluctance among airlines to add new routes.
“From July 2008 to March 2024, the airport added 54 new routes; 39 of these and six preexisting destinations were lost,” Port of Oakland Interim Director of Aviation Craig Simon said.
Port officials released the results of two surveys, including more than 1,400 respondents, this week, one focusing on residents within Oakland specifically and the other focusing on residents in the broader East Bay area. There a slim majority of respondents said they were comfortable with the name change. Roughly two-thirds of both groups said they were comfortable with the change after receiving further explanation of the reasons for the change.
But not everyone was happy about it.
San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu said the new name would infringe on the San Francisco International Airport’s trademark, and the city — which owns and operates SFO — will pursue legal action if the port goes through with the change.
“Any reasonable person can see that the proposed name change is going to create confusion for passengers,” Chiu told KQED after the vote results were announced. “We believe that the proposal appears intentionally designed to divert travelers who may be unfamiliar with Bay Area geography and also lead them to believe that Oakland Airport has a business relationship with SFO, which it does not.”
“They’ve forced us to have no choice but to take legal action,” Chiu added. “As soon as I get to the office tomorrow, I’ll be huddling with my attorneys, and we will figure out next steps.”