upper waypoint

Newsom Signs Law to Protect Doctors Who Mail Abortion Pills to Other States

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

A white man in a suit and tie explains something toward the camera.
Gov. Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Oakland, on Dec. 22, 2021. (Jane Tyska/Digital First Media/East Bay Times via Getty Images)

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a new law on Wednesday that aims to stop other states from prosecuting doctors and pharmacists who mail abortion pills to patients in places where the procedure is banned.

California already has a law protecting doctors who provide abortions from out-of-state judgements. But that law was designed to protect doctors who treat patients from other states who travel to California.

The new law goes further by forbidding authorities from cooperating with out-of-state investigations into doctors who mail abortion pills to patients in other states. It also bans bounty hunters or bail agents from apprehending doctors and pharmacists in California and transporting them to another state to stand trial for providing an abortion.

Other states, including New York and Massachusetts, have similar laws. But California’s law also bars state-based social media companies — like Facebook — from complying with out-of-state subpoenas, warrants or other requests for records to discover the identity of patients seeking abortion pills.

“Health care providers, physically located in California, will be able to offer a lifeline to people in states that have cut off access to essential care, and be shielded from the draconian laws of those states,” state Sen. Nancy Skinner, a Berkeley Democrat and author of the bill, said in a statement.

Sponsored

The law only protects doctors and pharmacists who reside in California. If a doctor or pharmacist leaves California to provide care to a patient in another state, the law would not protect them.

“We will continue to protect women and health care workers who are seeking and providing basic care,” Newsom said in a news release announcing he had signed the law.

The California Catholic Conference opposed the law, arguing the state is “engaging in ideological colonization against states and citizens that do not want abortion.”

“Denying the legitimate interest of other states to protect unborn children and public health is a dangerous precedent,” the association wrote in a letter to lawmakers earlier this year.

Last year, the U.S. Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, the 1973 decision that guaranteed access to abortion nationwide. Since then, half of the states have passed laws either banning or restricting access to abortion.

More Related Stories

In some states, that includes trying to limit access to the abortion pill mifepristone, which has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for up to the 10th week of pregnancy. It’s now the most common abortion method in the country.

The advocacy group Alliance Defending Freedom has challenged the FDA’s approval of mifepristone. In April, a federal judge revoked the FDA’s approval, a ruling that would have banned the drug in the U.S. But the U.S. Supreme Court decided to let the FDA’s approval remain in place while the judge’s ruling was appealed.

The law is one of eight that Newsom signed on Wednesday aiming to protect access to abortion. The Democrats who control California’s Legislature have made protecting access to abortion a priority since the overturning of Roe v. Wade.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
State Lawmaker Tries To Close Loophole In Gun Ownership Rules'We Approach in Peace': Are BART's Efforts to Help People in Crisis Working?Get Ready for the Golden State Valkyries, Bay Area's New WNBA Team'I Am Still Haunted': Women Accuse Rising SF Political Star of Rape and AbuseIn Transit: Amtrak's Future In CaliforniaSF Program Isn't Just 'Free Beer' for Unhoused. It's Backed Up by ResearchTiffany Haddish Wants to ‘Curse You With Joy’Demonstrators Rally Outside Google Conference, Call for End to Israel ContractsPro-Palestinian Protesters Stay Put on UCSF Campus a Day After Initial Police SweepUC Stands Firm on $32 Billion Investment Plans Amid Pro-Palestinian Calls for Withdrawal