But the industry is split on whether there should be more government regulations. Big oil companies are generally supportive of more rules, while smaller ones typically oppose them.
The large companies are heavily invested in natural gas. They worry that if methane emissions aren’t controlled, that could undermine arguments that gas is cleaner-burning than coal for generating electricity.
BP says it “applauds the EPA for proposing new rules aimed at reducing methane emissions.” In a statement, BP America Chair and President David Lawler says the company “supports the direct federal regulation of methane emissions from new and existing sources.”
But smaller drillers worry the new rules will make it harder for them to stay in business.
“The methane regulations proposed today by EPA will likely result in significant new costs associated with compliance,” says Anne Bradbury, CEO of the American Exploration and Production Council. Hinting at a possible legal challenge, Bradbury says her group will work with the EPA to craft regulations that “are cost-effective and workable” and “can withstand legal scrutiny.”
In 2014, Colorado was the first state to regulate methane produced by the oil and gas industry. Since then, the state has found — based on reports from oil and gas companies — that methane emissions have increased more slowly than oil production. But in Boston, a new study using a different method finds that methane leaks along smaller distribution lines are six times higher than state estimates. The study authors indicate methane leaks in other cities may also be higher than what the EPA has estimated.
Methane is getting more attention globally
Carbon dioxide gets most of the attention when it comes to greenhouse gases, but lately there’s been an increasing focus on methane. In May, a U.N. report urged immediate cuts in methane, calling it “the strongest lever we have to slow climate change over the next 25 years.”
As President Biden seeks to pass budget legislation to support his climate change plans, Democrats have drafted several forms of a methane fee. The details are still being worked out in Congress, but essentially the fee would charge oil and gas companies for releasing certain amounts of methane and potentially pay them to monitor and reduce emissions. Past methane-fee proposals have faced opposition from the oil industry and even Democrats in fossil fuel states.
In Glasgow, the U.S. and the European Union are leading an effort for a Global Methane Pledge. Countries that sign it commit to collectively reduce global methane emissions by at least 30% by 2030.
“It’s one of the most potent greenhouse gases there is,” said Biden as he addressed the U.N. climate meeting Tuesday. “It amounts to about half — half the warming we’re experiencing today — just methane.”
The White House says meeting that goal would reduce warming by at least 0.2 degrees Celsius (0.36 degrees Fahrenheit).
More than 100 countries have signed the pledge so far. Notably absent are some of the world’s largest methane emitters, including China, India and Russia. Biden didn’t mention those countries specifically, but he did encourage more countries to sign on to the pledge.
“For too long this potent super-pollutant has fallen off the agenda at major climate summits while its emissions have risen to all-time highs,” said Sarah Smith of the Clean Air Task Force. She said this risks “pushing our planet closer to potentially irreversible tipping points.”
What the EPA announced today is just a proposed regulation. Now the agency will collect comments, with final rules expected by the end of 2022.
Copyright 2021 NPR. To see more, visit npr.org.
9(MDAxOTAwOTE4MDEyMTkxMDAzNjczZDljZA004))