upper waypoint

The Re-Renaming of SF's China Beach: Honoring Immigrants, Rejecting White Supremacy

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

I was aghast when I discovered that San Francisco's beautiful little pocket beach, China Beach, was once named after James D. Phelan. Who is Phelan, you ask? He was a virulently anti-Asian San Francisco mayor and U.S. senator in the early 1900s who campaigned for reelection on a "Keep California White" platform.

In 1934, the California State Park and Recreation Commission voted unanimously to rename China Beach "James D. Phelan State Beach," partly because he helped finance the park.

It struck me as odd (OK, infuriating) that a place where Chinese people fished and camped on land formerly inhabited by the Yelamu Ohlone was, for over 40 years, named in honor of a guy who wanted to "keep California white." California turned the beach over to the National Park Service in 1974, which recommended changing the name back to China Beach.

Read the cartoon to learn about a more recent immigrant story that led to the big granite monument that's now at the beach, which honors the Chinese fishing community.

A Mark Fiore cartoon about the naming (and renaming) of San Francisco's China Beach, which was for 40 years named after San Francisco's white supremacist mayor, James D. Phelan.

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
How Have Wage Increases Affected Fast Food Workers?UC Berkeley Opens Civil Rights Investigation Into Confrontation at Dean’s HomeSFSU President Begins Negotiations With Campus Gaza ProtestersIt’s a 408 vs. 510 Showdown as San Jose Earthquakes Take on Oakland RootsSmall Houses Pose Solution to Housing CrisisA Family Fled Ethnic Violence in India. Its Echoes Resonate in the Bay AreaCalifornia Groundwater Surges After Torrential Rain and SnowstormsWho Owns the Apartment Next Door? California Agency Says it Will Take Millions to Find OutBerkeley Schools Chief Set to Testify at Congressional Hearing on AntisemitismImpact of California Fast Food Worker Wage Increase Still Too Early to Gauge