upper waypoint

Boom or Bust, You Decide

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

San Francisco's Proposition D aims to penalize landlords who keep their storefronts vacant while holding out for higher rent.

Next week, voters will decide whether the city should tax property owners who keep their property vacant for more than 182 days.

It's tough to prove that someone is keeping their property vacant in order to get more rent income in this super-heated economy, but it sure is hard to believe all those vacant storefronts would stay empty if landlords dropped the price from "exorbitant" to "ridiculous."

Supply and demand: Try it, you'll like it!

Sponsored

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Fairfield Official's Wife Returns Money From Campaign for New California CityNewsom Proposes Cutting 10,000 Vacant State Jobs to Help Close $27 Billion BudgetCalifornia's Central Coast Could Gain First Indigenous-Named Marine Sanctuary in USDivestment from Israeli Tech Is a Tall Order for Silicon Valley. Here’s WhyOakland's Airport Has a New Name, and a Lawsuit Against SF to Back It UpSF Wants to Give Downtown a Boost With More Pop-Ups in Empty StorefrontsRegulators Approve Fixed Charge For Utility BillsThe First Indigenous-Named Marine Sanctuary; A Climber's Story; A New Home for a Beloved DinerBay Area Rock Climber Beth Rodden Shares Triumphs, Traumas in New MemoirAli Velshi on the ‘Small Acts of Courage’ That Define His Family’s Inheritance and His Journalism