upper waypoint

$3 Million in Chevron's Political Committee War Chest

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

The Chevron oil refinery in Richmond.  (Deborah Svoboda/KQED)

Chevron has funneled $3 million into a trio of campaign committees to influence the Nov. 4 Richmond city election, including a nearly $1.3 million contribution on Aug. 8, according to newly filed campaign finance documents.

The committees, each a variation of Chevron’s "Moving Forward” campaign, spent about $1.3 million on the Richmond mayoral and City Council races as of the end of September, much of it on attack ads targeting local officials who are critical of Chevron’s massive local refinery.

Chevron’s independent campaign contributions, which are unlimited under federal law, have come in two installments. In March, a Moving Forward committee received $1.6 million from Chevron, with $1,296,700 coming Aug. 8.

Copy-of-Moving-Forward-flow-chart-spending

Chevron created the original Moving Forward committee in 2012 as part of a new strategy to advance its political interests in Richmond. Its full name is: “Moving Forward, a coalition of labor unions, small businesses, public safety and firefighters associations. Major funding by Chevron.”

Sponsored

Moving Forward representatives listed on the campaign finance documents did not respond to calls seeking comment.

In 2014 Chevron created two new committees.

The first is organized under the name Moving Forward and supports Nat Bates for mayor and Donna Powers, Charles Ramsey and Al Martinez for City Council. The committee has received $1.4 million -- nearly all from Chevron.

The second Moving Forward committee -- organized to oppose incumbent Mayor Gayle McLaughlin and council candidates Eduardo Martinez and Jovanka Beckles -- has received $500,000. Again, almost all of that sum is from Chevron.

The two newer committees spent about $1.3 million between Aug. 15 and Sept. 29. The $1.3 million figure is sure to grow quickly now that Moving Forward is running TV ads, expenditures for which have not yet been reported to the Richmond City Clerk.

Moving Forward Chevron Source

Some observers think Chevron’s involvement in the Richmond election overwhelms the voices of regular Richmond citizens by bombarding them with shiny mailers, billboards and television attack ads.

“You have a pretty big red flag when you have a multimillion-dollar corporation getting involved in a local election,” said Sarah Swanbeck a campaign finance transparency advocate with California Common Cause. “The average Richmond citizen is not equipped or able to fight back with their own resources.”

lower waypoint
next waypoint
UC Academic Workers’ Strike is Limited to Santa Cruz So Far. Here’s WhyHere’s Why KQED Is Latest Public Media Outlet to Face LayoffsFire Burns Home of SF Dog Walker Targeted by Racist ThreatsCalifornia Forever Hands Out $500K to Solano Nonprofits Ahead of November ElectionCarnaval San Francisco 2024: From the Parade Route to Parking, Here's What to KnowAll You Can Eat: Yes, the Bay Area Does Have a Late Night Dining SceneAfter 58 Years, CCSF Music Chair Closer Than Ever to Realizing Her DreamShefali Luthra on the ‘Undue Burden’ of Post-Roe Reproductive CareAlameda County District Attorney Sues Farmers Insurance Alleging Unfair Practices‘My Octopus Teacher’ Filmmaker on Connecting to Our Wild Selves