The knee-jerk impulse, which I’ll make an effort to resist for at least a few paragraphs, is to salute the late John Cassavetes for his many gutsy, painful explorations of human behavior and denigrate Lars Von Trier for a cinema of cruelty bereft of insight or compassion. Such a simplistic assessment of two unique film artists is clearly nothing more than personal preference masquerading as expert insight. And we can’t have that, can we?
This mini-chest beating is occasioned by the Bay Area release of the Danish director’s latest depiction of joyless existence and existential malaise, Melancholia, in conjunction with the brief revival of Cassavetes’ penultimate adult drama Love Streams (1984). The seemingly disparate directors are more similar than one might guess at first blush, starting with an interest in plot and incident only so far as the twists of the story increase the pressure on, and expose the fissures between, the characters.
Von Trier and Cassavetes find the human animal pretty fascinating under all circumstances, but are drawn particularly to the extreme moments when the animal is cornered. In Melancholia, Von Trier places depressed newlywed Kirsten Dunst, her sister (Charlotte Gainsbourg) and brother-in-law (Kiefer Sutherland) in an especially tight spot, setting the titular planet on a potential collision course with Earth. Stranded together on a palatial estate, their possibly final hours are a slo-motion melange of rehashed baggage, unspoken regrets and the most profound aloneness-slash-loneliness.
The failure of civilization grieves Von Trier, but its end doesn’t particularly bother him. The dark night of the soul, however — the void within each of us — rattles him to his Scandinavian core. Yet he adopts a coolly measured, distant aesthetic as the apocalypse approaches in Melancholia‘s second half. You may find his approach beautifully, unbearably devastating; it struck me as unnecessarily protracted and limpid. (Your reaction to Terence Malick’s The Tree of Life may be a useful reference point, as both films illustrate the slender line between banality and profundity. And both begin with lovely, lyrical and wordlessly mysterious sequences that respectively suggest the birth of our world and its end.)