Steely Dan, Inc. Fights Itself in Lawsuit Over Shares

Save ArticleSave Article

Failed to save article

Please try again

Steely Dan's Walter Becker, left (who passed away this past September), and Donald Fagan in Los Angeles in 2001. (Laura Farr/Getty Images)

Steely Dan, the artistic partnership of Donald Fagen and Walter Becker (with a revolving cast of songwriters and players), lasted nearly 50 years before Becker's death in early September. Now, a dispute between Fagen and Becker's estate, which is now owned by his widow Delia Coffi, has put a bitter spin on the legacy of a warm, winking, coolly funky corner of pop.

The suit is over a "buy/sell" contract the members of Steely Dan signed more than 45 years ago, on Halloween, 1972. The contract, included as an addendum to the complaint filed by Fagen's lawyer, Skip Miller last Tuesday (Nov. 21), says that if any of its signees dies or leaves the band, the band's corporation has the right to immediately repurchase their shares at book value. The contract also includes mention that any transfer of those shares to another person is still subject to the agreement. Fagen is the only surviving member of the original lineup of five players who signed the contract.

Delia Coffi's lawyers, Fagen claims, sent him a letter asserting "that the buy/sell agreement dated as of October 31, 1972 is of no force or effect." They also claim that the company managing Steely Dan, Inc.'s finances and business — Nigro, Karlin, Segal, Feldstein & Bolno (NKSFB), which also oversees the estate of Walter Becker — mismanaged Steely Dan's accounts and did not respond to Fagen's request for documents on the band's finances.

Fagen wants $1 million in damages and for the court to rule on whether the buy/sell agreement remains in effect.

When reached, NKSFB declined to comment on the lawsuit or any potential conflict of interest in representing both sides of the pending case.


In a statement released earlier today, the estate of Becker writes again that it believes the 1972 contract "was not in effect" when Becker passed away, continuing: "The misrepresentation that [Becker's] widow, Ms. Cioffi, initiated any litigious action is simply untrue. In our view, Mr. Fagen is unfairly trying to deprive Walter's family of the fruits of their joint labors.

"Since Walter's passing, we have endeavored to achieve a compromise with Mr. Fagen," going on to say that Fagen, through Skip Miller, "did not even attempt to contact us prior to filing a lawsuit."

In response to that response, Skip Miller writes today that "the main point is that the buy/sell agreement at the heart of the suit is as valid as the day it was signed. It's something Mr. Becker felt strongly about keeping in place and honoring, even during his years of illness. Mr. Fagen believes Mr. Becker's estate is entitled to receive all normal royalties on the songs they wrote together. But this case is about the future of the band, and we will vigorously defend the contract."

Copyright 2017 NPR. To see more, visit