window.__IS_SSR__=true
window.__INITIAL_STATE__={
"attachmentsReducer": {
"audio_0": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_0",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background0.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_1": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_1",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background1.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_2": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_2",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background2.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_3": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_3",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background3.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_4": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_4",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background4.jpg"
}
}
},
"placeholder": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "placeholder",
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-160x107.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 107,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"medium": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-800x533.jpg",
"width": 800,
"height": 533,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"medium_large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-768x512.jpg",
"width": 768,
"height": 512,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1536x1024.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 1024,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-lrg": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1536x1024.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 1024,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-med": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-sm": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-800x533.jpg",
"width": 800,
"height": 533,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1038x576.jpg",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xxsmall": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-160x107.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 107,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xsmall": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"small": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xlarge": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1920x1280.jpg",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1280,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-32": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 32,
"height": 32,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-50": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 50,
"height": 50,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-64": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 64,
"height": 64,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-96": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 96,
"height": 96,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-128": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 128,
"height": 128,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"detail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 160,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1333
}
}
},
"news_12060977": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12060977",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12060977",
"found": true
},
"title": "MoralPanic_tn2",
"publishDate": 1761096759,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12060973,
"modified": 1761097341,
"caption": "An old-school TV is tuned to a visual depicting Satan.",
"credit": "Photos by duncan1890, Pituk Loonhong, and PATSTOCK / Getty Images; composite image by Gabriela Glueck / KQED",
"altTag": "A color image of a vintage TV set against a red background featuring illustrations of apparent devils with pitchforks.. On the screen is a black-and-white medieval drawing of Satan with wings and horns, surrounded by smaller figures in hellish scenes. The TV’s dial and speaker are visible, with the words “Close All Tabs” displayed where the brand name would be.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/MoralPanic_tn2-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/MoralPanic_tn2-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/MoralPanic_tn2-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/MoralPanic_tn2-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/MoralPanic_tn2.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12059912": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12059912",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12059912",
"found": true
},
"title": "AI_Con_thumbnail",
"publishDate": 1760479501,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12059911,
"modified": 1760515545,
"caption": "Composite image of robotic hands hovering over a laptop showing an error screen. ",
"credit": "Composite by Gabriela Glueck; photos by Rawf8, MASTER, and Vertigo3d",
"altTag": "White, purple, and black robot hands hover over a laptop. The laptop is warped and appears distorted. The laptop screen shows that the laptop has crashed. These components are layered over a purple and green background featuring keys labeled “CHAT AI BOT.”",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"medium": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-2000x1125.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1125,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-2000x1125.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1125,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-160x90.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-1536x864.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"2048x2048": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-2048x1152.jpg",
"width": 2048,
"height": 1152,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-1038x576.jpg",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-2000x1125.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1125,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/AI_Con_thumbnail-scaled.jpg",
"width": 2560,
"height": 1440
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12059024": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12059024",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12059024",
"found": true
},
"title": "CAT — DatingPan_Thumbnail",
"publishDate": 1759875528,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12058992,
"modified": 1759875624,
"caption": "Pixelated broken hearts on a smartphone screen layered over a background highlighting the dangers and risks of the internet.",
"credit": "Photos by Malte Mueller and DrAfter123 via Getty Images",
"altTag": "Graphic image collage featuring two phone screens, each displaying half of a pixelated heart that is broken because the screens are not touching. The background of the image features two eyes, a camera, a map pin, and a hand illustration reaching out. In the bottom right corner, the words “Close All Tabs” appear in a pixel-style font.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"medium": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-2000x1125.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1125,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-2000x1125.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1125,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-160x90.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-1536x864.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"2048x2048": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-2048x1152.jpg",
"width": 2048,
"height": 1152,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-1038x576.jpg",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-2000x1125.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1125,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/CAT-—-DatingPan_Thumbnail-scaled.jpg",
"width": 2560,
"height": 1440
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12058226": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12058226",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12058226",
"found": true
},
"title": "frank_02_webimg",
"publishDate": 1759340366,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12058181,
"modified": 1759341822,
"caption": "A custom mechanical keyboard being assembled during a Twitch stream by Frank Lee, who also organizes KeebLife, a community meetup for keyboard enthusiasts.",
"credit": "Image provided by Frank Lee",
"altTag": "A close-up of a custom mechanical keyboard mid-assembly, placed on a comic-style desk mat with bold black lines radiating outward. The board has orange switches exposed, with a few red and white keycaps already installed. A plastic bin of loose keycaps sits above the keyboard, and the words “Close All Tabs” appear in pixel-style font in the upper right corner.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/frank_02_webimg-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/frank_02_webimg-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/frank_02_webimg-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/frank_02_webimg-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/10/frank_02_webimg.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12057330": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12057330",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12057330",
"found": true
},
"title": "AIandReligion_webimg",
"publishDate": 1758668597,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12057327,
"modified": 1758670181,
"caption": "An android robot at Kodaiji temple in Kyoto, Japan, Jun 18, 2019. The 400-year-old temple introduced the robot as part of an effort to spark interest in Buddhism.",
"credit": "Charly Triballeau/AFP via Getty Images",
"altTag": "A profile image of an android robot in Kyoto holding its hands together in prayer. The robot has white skin with the top of the robotic head exposed. The robot is facing the left side of the frame, and is positioned in front of a blue and red gradient background. The Close All Tabs logo appears in white pixelated font in the lower left corner.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/AIandReligion_webimg-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/AIandReligion_webimg-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/AIandReligion_webimg-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/AIandReligion_webimg-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/AIandReligion_webimg.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12056213": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12056213",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12056213",
"found": true
},
"title": "CharlieKirkMemes_webimg",
"publishDate": 1758078700,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12056209,
"modified": 1758078808,
"caption": "A mix of obscure memes and video game references were inscribed on the casings of the bullets used to kill Charlie Kirk. ",
"credit": "Rebecca Noble / Stringer via Getty Images / Graphic by Morgan Sung / KQED",
"altTag": "A composite image made up of a variety of memes layered on top of one another. Some of the images include Pepe the frog memes — a crudely drawn cartoon green frog with bulging eyes. In the center is an image of Charlie Kirk standing at a podium in a blue suit with his arm raised, making a thumbs up sign. The Close All Tabs logo appears in white pixelated font with a purple background in the lower left corner.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/CAT-—-Charlie-Kirk-Memes-Web-Img-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/CAT-—-Charlie-Kirk-Memes-Web-Img-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/CAT-—-Charlie-Kirk-Memes-Web-Img-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/CAT-—-Charlie-Kirk-Memes-Web-Img-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/CAT-—-Charlie-Kirk-Memes-Web-Img.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12055410": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12055410",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12055410",
"found": true
},
"title": "23andMe_webimg",
"publishDate": 1757463534,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12055408,
"modified": 1757463573,
"caption": "A view of 23andMe headquarters in Sunnyvale, California. Genetic testing and biotechnology company 23andMe filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy on March 23, 2025.",
"credit": "Tayfun Coskun/Anadolu via Getty Images",
"altTag": "An image of the 23andMe headquarters in Sunnyvale, California. The company’s sign is prominently displayed — it contains the 23andMe logo in lavender font with a pink and green X next to it. The sign is on top of a white stone wall in the grass in front of a textured glass building. The Close All Tabs logo appears in pixelated font in the lower left corner.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/23andMe_webimg-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/23andMe_webimg-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/23andMe_webimg-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/23andMe_webimg-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/09/23andMe_webimg.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12053846": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12053846",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12053846",
"found": true
},
"title": "CAT — Teachers Curbing AI Use - IMG",
"publishDate": 1756254354,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12053843,
"modified": 1756256099,
"caption": "Two high school students discuss an essay for their English final exam at Thomas Jefferson High School in Denver, Colorado.",
"credit": "Hyoung Chang/The Denver Post",
"altTag": "Two female high school students hover over a computer. One student has a hand covering her face as the other student leans in closely to the computer screen.Their teacher and a projection of the lesson are blurred in the background. The Close All Tabs logo appears in pixelated font in the lower right corner.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Teachers-Curbing-AI-Use-IMG-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Teachers-Curbing-AI-Use-IMG-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Teachers-Curbing-AI-Use-IMG-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Teachers-Curbing-AI-Use-IMG-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Teachers-Curbing-AI-Use-IMG.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12052910": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12052910",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12052910",
"found": true
},
"title": "CAT — Shadow Scholars IMG",
"publishDate": 1755648263,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12052900,
"modified": 1755648389,
"caption": "A Kenyan essay writer sits in a desk chair with his laptop. The photo is a still from the upcoming documentary “The Shadow Scholars.” ",
"credit": "Photo Courtesy of Eloise King",
"altTag": "A wide image of a Kenyan man sitting in a desk chair on his laptop in a mostly empty room. The laptop is placed on a glass coffee table in front of him. Orange light streams in from curtained windows behind him to the left of the screen. A large cross hangs on a brown and gold wall behind him. The floor is bare and dappled in light. The Close All Tabs logo appears in pixelated font in the lower right corner.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Shadow-Scholars-IMG-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Shadow-Scholars-IMG-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Shadow-Scholars-IMG-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Shadow-Scholars-IMG-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/CAT-—-Shadow-Scholars-IMG.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12051991": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12051991",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12051991",
"found": true
},
"title": "Gen Z Stare_web img",
"publishDate": 1755049132,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12051989,
"modified": 1755049818,
"caption": "An illustration features a browser window stacked with close-up images of eyes staring blankly—referencing the viral “Gen Z Stare.”",
"credit": "Illustration by Maya Cueva and Chris Egusa/KQED",
"altTag": "Illustration of a computer browser window with four stacked images showing pairs of eyes: the top from a classical painting, the second from a young person with dark eyebrows, the third from a small dog, and the fourth from another person staring blankly. A large pixelated cursor hovers on the right, and the background is pink with the words “Close All Tabs” in blocky white text.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Gen-Z-Stare_web-img-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Gen-Z-Stare_web-img-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Gen-Z-Stare_web-img-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Gen-Z-Stare_web-img-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Gen-Z-Stare_web-img.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12051062": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12051062",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12051062",
"found": true
},
"title": "Algospeak_web img",
"publishDate": 1754437212,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12051056,
"modified": 1754437259,
"caption": "Adam Aleksic, author of Algospeak: How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language. ",
"credit": "Graphic by Chris Egusa and Maya Cueva/KQED",
"altTag": "On the left is Adam Aleksic, a young man with short brown hair, glasses, and a trimmed beard, wearing a cream T-shirt and dark jacket, smiling at the camera. On the right is the cover of his book Algospeak: How Social Media Is Transforming the Future of Language, decorated with a pattern of small yellow emoji faces. The background is pink with layered browser‑style frames.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Algospeak_web-img-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Algospeak_web-img-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Algospeak_web-img-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Algospeak_web-img-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/08/Algospeak_web-img.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
},
"news_12050194": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "news_12050194",
"meta": {
"index": "attachments_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12050194",
"found": true
},
"title": "CAT — Save or Scroll with Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II",
"publishDate": 1753838040,
"status": "inherit",
"parent": 12050185,
"modified": 1753839125,
"caption": "Labubus, matcha, and Dubai chocolate are all internet sensations on their own. Together, they create a potent buzzword cocktail that’s bound to generate clicks.",
"credit": "Image by Morgan Sung and Maya Cueva/KQED",
"altTag": "A pointy-toothed plushy doll called a Labubu is wearing a Dodgers hat and is next to a matcha drink and dubai chocolate. The images have a glitched effect, and sit within a browser window in the middle of the screen. The background is a pink and purple gradient. To the left of the Labubu is a person with long dark hair placed within a graphic browser window. On the right side is a person with short cropped dark hair and a collared shirt, also sitting within a browser window. The words “Close All Tabs” appear in pixelated white font in the lower left corner of the image and a black and white cursor icon hovers near the middle of the screen.",
"description": null,
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/07/CAT-—-Save-or-Scroll-with-Daysia-Tolentino-and-Moises-Mendez-II-160x90.png",
"width": 160,
"height": 90,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/07/CAT-—-Save-or-Scroll-with-Daysia-Tolentino-and-Moises-Mendez-II-1536x864.png",
"width": 1536,
"height": 864,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/07/CAT-—-Save-or-Scroll-with-Daysia-Tolentino-and-Moises-Mendez-II-672x372.png",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/07/CAT-—-Save-or-Scroll-with-Daysia-Tolentino-and-Moises-Mendez-II-1038x576.png",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/png"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2025/07/CAT-—-Save-or-Scroll-with-Daysia-Tolentino-and-Moises-Mendez-II.png",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1080
}
},
"isLoading": false,
"fetchFailed": false
}
},
"audioPlayerReducer": {
"postId": "stream_live",
"isPaused": true,
"isPlaying": false,
"pfsActive": false,
"pledgeModalIsOpen": true,
"playerDrawerIsOpen": false,
"liveAudioPlayStartedAt": 0,
"liveAudioPlayContext": ""
},
"authorsReducer": {
"chambrick": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "11832",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "11832",
"found": true
},
"name": "Chris Hambrick",
"firstName": "Chris",
"lastName": "Hambrick",
"slug": "chambrick",
"email": "chambrick@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": "KQED Contributor",
"bio": null,
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/23cb83888bc440645af5d36d0d1909e8ecb6cef21f2fdb96abf9a55495bb19d8?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"bluesky": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "arts",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "podcasts",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Chris Hambrick | KQED",
"description": "KQED Contributor",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/23cb83888bc440645af5d36d0d1909e8ecb6cef21f2fdb96abf9a55495bb19d8?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/23cb83888bc440645af5d36d0d1909e8ecb6cef21f2fdb96abf9a55495bb19d8?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/chambrick"
},
"cegusa": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "11869",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "11869",
"found": true
},
"name": "Chris Egusa",
"firstName": "Chris",
"lastName": "Egusa",
"slug": "cegusa",
"email": "cegusa@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": "KQED Contributor",
"bio": null,
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3562ed52747313a4c94017da88ea89f9e85cd901f63ebc056a7d5e0adf4a03da?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"bluesky": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "arts",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Chris Egusa | KQED",
"description": "KQED Contributor",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3562ed52747313a4c94017da88ea89f9e85cd901f63ebc056a7d5e0adf4a03da?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3562ed52747313a4c94017da88ea89f9e85cd901f63ebc056a7d5e0adf4a03da?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/cegusa"
},
"mcueva": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "11943",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "11943",
"found": true
},
"name": "Maya Cueva",
"firstName": "Maya",
"lastName": "Cueva",
"slug": "mcueva",
"email": "mcueva@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": "KQED Contributor",
"bio": null,
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/238c7aba67c4b6b7b891965ba8cc9e9a4928b5dbdeaf4bde6a81c13e87f49b49?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"bluesky": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Maya Cueva | KQED",
"description": "KQED Contributor",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/238c7aba67c4b6b7b891965ba8cc9e9a4928b5dbdeaf4bde6a81c13e87f49b49?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/238c7aba67c4b6b7b891965ba8cc9e9a4928b5dbdeaf4bde6a81c13e87f49b49?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/mcueva"
},
"msung": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "11944",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "11944",
"found": true
},
"name": "Morgan Sung",
"firstName": "Morgan",
"lastName": "Sung",
"slug": "msung",
"email": "msung@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": "Close All Tabs Host",
"bio": null,
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/34033b8d232ee6c987ca6f0a1a28f0e5?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Morgan Sung | KQED",
"description": "Close All Tabs Host",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/34033b8d232ee6c987ca6f0a1a28f0e5?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/34033b8d232ee6c987ca6f0a1a28f0e5?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/msung"
}
},
"pagesReducer": {
"news_program_close-all-tabs": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35082",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35082",
"score": 15.869722
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"slug": "close-all-tabs",
"taxonomy": "program",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Close All Tabs | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35099,
"isLoading": false,
"title": "Close All Tabs",
"pageMeta": {
"site": "news",
"WpPageTemplate": "page-topic-editorial",
"currentPage": 5
},
"blocks": [
{
"blockName": "kqed/post-list",
"attrs": {
"layout": "cardArticle2",
"query": "posts/news?program=close-all-tabs",
"seeMore": false,
"paginated": true,
"page": 5
}
},
{
"blockName": "kqed/ad"
}
]
}
},
"pfsSessionReducer": {},
"postsReducer": {
"stream_live": {
"type": "live",
"id": "stream_live",
"audioUrl": "https://streams.kqed.org/kqedradio",
"title": "Live Stream",
"excerpt": "Live Stream information currently unavailable.",
"link": "/radio",
"featImg": "",
"label": {
"name": "KQED Live",
"link": "/"
}
},
"stream_kqedNewscast": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "stream_kqedNewscast",
"audioUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/.stream/anon/radio/RDnews/newscast.mp3?_=1",
"title": "KQED Newscast",
"featImg": "",
"label": {
"name": "88.5 FM",
"link": "/"
}
},
"news_12060973": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12060973",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12060973",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1761127200000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "satanic-panic-in-the-age-of-the-internet",
"title": "Satanic Panic in the Age of the Internet",
"publishDate": 1761127200,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Satanic Panic in the Age of the Internet | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"#episode-transcript\">\u003ci>View the full episode transcript.\u003c/i>\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What do colorful and plush Labubu dolls have in common with Mesopotamian mythology? If you believe some viral TikToks, everything. Recent conspiracy theories have linked the toys to everything from ancient demonic spirits to Satan worship. But behind those ideas flooding online feeds is something older and darker: the return of moral panic. In this episode, host Morgan Sung digs into how a new generation of “satanic panic” has gone digital, from fears of occult rituals in song to online crusades against queer and trans people. Journalist Sarah Marshall, host of the new podcast series The Devil You Know, joins Morgan to help trace how misinformation and moral outrage keep recycling the same fears — just with new villains. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm?e=KQINC7641922375\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.remembersarahmarshall.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sarah Marshall\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, journalist and host of the \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’re Wrong About \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">podcast\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://app.magellan.ai/listen_links/Qub2Qv\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Devil You Know with Sarah Marshall\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">CBC Podcasts\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://yourewrongabout.buzzsprout.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’re Wrong About\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">podcast\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Sarah Marshall\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/culture/23025505/leftist-groomers-homophobia-satanic-panic-explained\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The right’s moral panic over “grooming” invokes age-old homophobia\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Aja Romano, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Vox\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.cbc.ca/arts/satan-wants-you-filmmakers-q-a-sean-horlor-steve-j-adams-1.6822213\">The strange origins of the Satanic Panic: How one Canadian book started a worldwide witch hunt\u003c/a> — Leah Collins, \u003ci>CBC Arts\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Host, Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just a note – this episode includes mentions of sexual abuse, so listen with care.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So Labubus blew up this year, right? They’re the super trendy, colorful little blind box plushies.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The dolls, which are usually listed for $22 are now in some cases fetching hundreds of dollars on resale sites.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But is there something darker hiding behind these collectible plushies? Something demonic?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Look beyond the little sharp teeth, the little mischievous grin and those little eyes, these names can be linked to ancient spirits.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On top of that, there’s an actual demon named Pezuzu, which sounds very similar to Labubu.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s a real demon from Mesopotamian mythology. It’s about plagues, chaos, and fear.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Y’all, when I say different toys that give you the hey jeebies or you feel that nudge in your spirit, it is warning you to not open up the door and allow that demonic spirit into your home.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> People have gone super viral by claiming that they unwittingly bought their child a little boo boo, only for it to spiritually terrorize their family.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Others are pulling up Bible verses about Satan’s disguises, which apparently now includes super trendy collectibles with exorbitant resale value.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. That particular verse means that he doesn’t come with horns or fire, but he can come marketed and gift wrapped and trendy just as these dolls do.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This kind of moral fear mongering is not new. Back in the 80s, it was known as the satanic panic.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Members of satanic or occult groups share common traits such as the access to perform perverted sex acts, such as homosexuality, bisexuality, sodomy, bestiality, and necrophilia. All of these acts are carried out in the name of Satan.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">KABC Devil Worship \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When kids will do their, their sacrificing and their animal mutilation, they’ll do it within a pentagram, and allow the blood to drip into some kind of container because they use it for bathing in or drinking.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Today, we’re seeing the same moral fear mongering take place online. Once, some people thought Furbys were the devil’s toy. Now it’s Labubus.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Journalist Sarah Marshall has been trying to understand why these cycles keep repeating.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Guest, Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m Sarah Marshall. I host a podcast called You’re Wrong About\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> about misremembered history.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> And now she has a new show called The Devil You Know. It’s a CBC podcast miniseries about the satanic panic.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, do you think Labubus are demonic?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it depends on how you use the word demonic. I think one of the questions that I try to look at in the show and also want us all to look at in this time of rolling satanic panics is like, what are people using the words Satan to mean?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because there’s a good solid slice of that pie chart, I think throughout history is anything that we don’t like and want to vilify as strongly and as quickly as we possibly can.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so at the time I was first learning about this, it felt like something the country hadn’t reckoned with yet, and it was very shocking to me, and feels much less shocking now because we’re doing it again after all this time.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sarah’s new miniseries got me thinking about what satanic panic looks like in the digital age, beyond Labubu conspiracy theories. As somewhat of an expert in this particular moment in history, Sarah is going to explain how satanic panic spread so quickly. And what to look out for to avoid falling for it again.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ready?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To understand the way fear mongering spreads online and targets innocent people, we have to go back in time by opening a new tab: What was the satanic panic?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Picture this: The year is 1980. The North American Mall is thriving.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s the golden age of arcades, VCRs are the hot new thing, and there’s big hair and acid washed jeans. Oh, and seems like Satan is lurking around every corner, because a rapidly spreading fear is taking hold of North America, that satanic cults are indoctrinating and ritually abusing children.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s a bunch of kind of roots to that phenomenon, but a really big moment is the publication of a book in 1980 called \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Michelle Remembers,\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> where a woman goes through what I have always imagined to be hypnotherapy. I have no confirmation of this, but she ends up in some kind of trance-like state that her therapist puts her in. And he develops the idea very quickly that she has been abused by a satanic coven.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ultimately, the story ends up being a very sensational bestseller, and then it’s treated as a textbook by police and by therapists and so on who are learning how to recognize child abuse and who are told that satanic abuse is the kind they should really be looking for and things really take off from there.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Like you said, there are these major cultural flashpoints that sparked this massive panic. There was \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Michelle Remembers\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, and then there’s the McMartin preschool trial, which is this highly publicized case investigating claims of child sexual abuse in the 80s.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Newsclip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The allegations went beyond sexual molestation. They were tales of satanic rites, of pornographic pictures, of the mutilation of animals to frighten the children into silence.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But from the beginning, the defendants in the case, the teachers, have insisted that they were the victims of a latter day witch hunt.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then throughout the series, you also connect the spread of satanic panic to the progressive direction that culture was moving in. How did marginalized groups gaining rights suddenly lead to satanic panic? Like, what’s the bigger cultural context here?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, ironically, so much of this appears actually to be a backlash to the idea of people getting out from under the thumb of some of the more dangerous aspects of American Christianity, you know, and this idea of women’s liberation is a very recent phenomenon. We’ve successfully struck down the ERA in the United States, of course, but it was still, still a real concern as the 80s started that women might get real rights at some point.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By ERA, Sarah’s talking about the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed amendment to prohibit sex-based discrimination.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was passed by Congress in 1972, but then it was sent to the states to be ratified. Religious groups and conservatives stalled the process.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gay liberation is also a movement that’s underway, and so I think it’s always pretty easy to sell to people the idea, like, wouldn’t it be nice if you didn’t have to accept your kid as who they were? Wouldn’t it be great if you could just say that the Satanists were making them do that? You know, I think that’s a big part of the sales point for this.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That explains some of the cultural context.The media landscape also played a huge part in fueling satanic panic. In 1987, the fairness doctrine ended.That was the FCC policy that required broadcasters to present different perspectives when reporting on any issues of public importance.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When the fairness doctrine ended, local TV stations went all out with sensationalized reporting and pretty much no fact checking.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think one of them is that historically, you know, to my understanding, if you’re, if you’re working in media really at any level locally or nationally, you have been allowed to say, well, the police said this, so that’s probably true, you know, like only very recently has it become, I think, to any degree normalized to even early on in the conversation, be like, well, the police say this, but they’re just one of many sources, you know, by, by American journalism for quite a long time.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There was an area in Ohio where law enforcement wasted an astounding amount of money searching for the mass grave of satanic sacrifices that they believe just had to be there because somebody had found a little piece of red thread hanging off a tree limb and was like, well, that’s got to be Satanists.Who else could, no non-Satanist could put thread in a tree like this. And there’s, you know, and they didn’t find anything, arguably because there was nothing there.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s kind of a horror story about what happens when we give the police too much power and credibility. And also, as you can imagine, and it’s hard in many ways to fault people for this-In…if you’re working in media and you’ve got to try and get your story on air and maybe, you know, you’re trying to advance your career, you’re trying to get places, there is nothing that will make people stay on your channel more than saying satanic sacrifice, you know, it’s just, it’s hard to beat that.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, how profitable was the satanic panic machine?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Man, I don’t have numbers in front of me, but I mean, if you look at the kind of media that was on TV throughout the 80s and into the 90s, it just spread like wildfire through, through primetime news and also through daytime TV because this is a time of like many competing talk shows on TV. Oprah was kind of getting her sea legs at this point, and I think every single one of them covered satanic cults at some point in the 80s. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For example, the author of \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Satan’s Underground \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">was uncovered very thoroughly. As an acknowledged fraudster who once she got tired of pretending to be a satanic abuse survivor, started pretending to be a Holocaust survivor. Um, and so it also became over time like really fertile ground for con artists. So it’s just there’s kind of something for everyone in this.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you are pure of heart, it gives you something really important to put your energy behind and if you just want to scam people or get attention, you can also do that. And if you want to scare adults, you can paint a pentagram on something you can have that as well, and boy did they freak out when they saw those.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Satanic panic often targeted people who didn’t fit into society’s mold, who didn’t abide by traditional values. They weren’t into the occults, they were just different. And more often than not, the targets of satanic panic were queer, like in the case of the San Antonio Four. That was a group of four friends who were all openly lesbian in Texas in the mid-90s.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the women hosted her two nieces for a weeklong visit in 1994.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The nieces, who were 7 and 9 at the time, accused the group of sexually abusing them as part of a satanic ritual. The ensuing media frenzy and the prosecutors portrayed the group as a perverse lesbian cult, indoctrinating and sacrificing little girls.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The women were convicted and spent nearly 15 years in prison before one of the nieces recanted her testimony. She admitted that she had been coached into accusing her aunt and her friends because her family was upset that her aunt was a lesbian. Satanic panic was laced with homophobia from the start, and that was true in the case of the San Antonio Four.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, at the core of this case, we have this, to me, just so intensely bittersweet story of these four young women who are able to kind of create a safe home for each other and their children and who were accused of organized and ritualistic child abuse by a male family member who had a grudge against one of these young women for resisting his advances, you know. And so I think one of the things it shows is that by the 1990s, when this case took place, and into the 2000s, but when all this began, you could argue that, some men might have figured out that accusing a woman who got in your way or who didn’t do what you wanted her to, especially a queer woman, of child abuse or ritualistic abuse or satanism, that that was maybe going to be very useful to you, because we had created through the satanic panic, this idea that if you were queer, you are much more likely to be one of these Satanists.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Um and again, that was also a way for mainstream culture to Pretend to not notice that the majority of people committing child sexual abuse are men who the child knows already. We had to sort of figure out an opposite direction to put our energy in so we could keep ignoring the real problem, I think, in some ways. And so it’s just It becomes a very useful myth, and it’s very scary to see that in action.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Does any of this sound familiar to you: Scary gay people, grooming and indoctrinating children?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[News Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Critics are tearing into a drag story time for toddlers held at a public library.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[News Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The library told a local news site that there wasn’t any sexualized content planned for this drag storytime.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> We don’t always call it the satanic panic today, but this moral fear mongering and backlash against marginalized communities isn’t all that different. We’ll dive into that after this break.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The San Antonio 4 case started just before I was born, and the openly lesbian women who were wrongfully accused and convicted of satanic ritual abuse, weren’t exonerated until I was in my 20s. In pop culture, satanic panic seems like an era of cultural history that happened decades ago, before it was neatly wrapped up and put to rest. But in reality, echoes of satanic panic still exist today, and thanks to the internet, that fear mongering is more insidious than ever. Let’s talk about what it looks like in a new tab: The new satanic panic.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Did satanic panic ever really die out?\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There was a time when I would have said it did, and now I’m like, no, yeah, it’s still there. It’s like when you go camping and they’re like, please dowse your campfires. Please just pour so much water on them and stare at them for a long time. And sometimes, you know, the American legal system is like, I think that’s fine, let’s just go home. And then it just sort of like just keeps smoldering away. And I think that nothing has been more helpful in its desire to to spread and grow and become as big as it once was, than the Trump administration, as, as you might imagine. Surprise!\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Let’s cover the satanic panic of today. I mean, there’s obviously the conservative backlash to provocative art, like, I’m thinking of Cynthia Erivo playing Jesus and Jesus Christ Superstar, and then it goes a little further where people were convinced that Lady Gaga’s Coachella performance, which had like occult references and biblical imagery.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lady Gaga has been blaspheming Jesus for basically her entire career.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lady Gaga is a practicing witch and has been very open about the spell that she is casting and the hex that she is casting in her song Abracadabra.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People genuinely thought that was a satanic ritual, but moral panics aren’t always as overt as that. I mean, they’re not, oh my God, this thing is demonic, this labubu equals Pazuzu kind of situation. What are the more subtle moral panics you’ve seen recently?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think one of them that seems, and this is my personal diagnosis of a moral panic, or kind of an aspect of our satanic panic of today, because the anxiety parents feel over trans kids in school sports, which is something that I, you know, personally believe politicians whipped up out of really the clear blue sky in order to give them something to do.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And this idea that your child is somehow more in danger from another child on their soccer team than they are from, again, the adult men in the world generally who they already know.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so it’s so interesting that we always have the search for theoretical Satanists who are always just kind of right out of reach when megalomaniacal white men have always been right there, front and center.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Yeah, in the series, you dive into this concept of moral entrepreneurship. What is that? And how does that connect to the kind of more insidious, quieter moral panic that we’re seeing today, that isn’t strictly like, look at Satan?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, you know, a classic example that many of us have probably seen at this point is one of these like very cheesy 80s, how to spot Satanism in your community, you know, law enforcement training videos.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip from \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In satanic occultism, that which is good is bad and that which is bad is good, and as you view this learning and educational tape, pay attention to notice the reverse of everything that is normal becoming abnormal.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think one of the things the satanic panic did that I think we’re seeing today and what pops to mind for me is, you know, some of the really fraudulent businesses that have been built around our fear of human trafficking and sort of creating in people the idea that human trafficking, you know, and which in reality is about wage theft and about undocumented workers, you know, being enslaved essentially, and that’s typically how it, I think happens statistically most often. But which is reinvented into a theory that, like, 37 year old white women such as myself are going to get kidnapped at Michael’s, you know, and, and be put on a slave ship, which is something white women love to think about ourselves inexplicably.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think that there’s, there’s this idea in the 80s satanic panic and that we’re very much seeing today that it’s so nice to be able to get rich and be the ultimate hero protecting women and children from violence and Satanism. At the same time, it offers what feels like a virtuous heroic way to make so much money.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> I mean, speaking of those anti-trafficking videos or those like warning, there’s a creepy guy in the Michael’s parking lot stalking women. Like I, I always watch so many of those and like I, it gets to the end, you know, they’re showing all the different ways to protect yourself against these scary faceless people, and it gets to the end and I’m like, oh, it was an ad. You’re selling me, you’re selling me a product to supposedly protect myself.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve seen those too, yes, and that’s so depressing that they, yeah, that there’s a real, real push to commodify women’s fear. And yeah, and it’s always like if if you come back to your car and someone’s taped a banana to the door, never eat that banana, it’s like, well, I could have known that.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Yeah. So how do moral panic spread today? What goes into feeding them?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, things were volatile enough in the 80s when we had at the time, this what felt very instantaneous form of spread of information through cable news and through magazines and papers and and things like that. And now, of course, I mean, our, the lifespan of all of our trends is like 20 minutes, you know, and so we, the way that misinformation can spread around the world.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it feels to me like there’s some kind of unwritten law that misinformation must always be faster than information. And I don’t know why, but there is, there is the adage that, you know, a lie can spread around the world before the truth can get its shoes on. And now that time is, is even shorter, I would say.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think it’s, you know, just in social media, whether people are attempting to tell the truth or not, there’s a real bias towards what we know will get people’s attention, and, you know, if it bleeds it leads famously. And if it bleeds from a little Satanist dagger, then then that’s even better.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I, I think to me, one of the big problems, and this does feel very different from the satanic panic of the 80s, is that we now exist in our very own little media worlds most of the time, you know. It’s one of the things that’s so unsettling about the satanic panic of the 80s, is that everybody was watching the same nightly news and hearing the same stories, but I think, currently it worries me even more that today you have, you know, people walking around in their very own pockets of information and not even having to consume the same media as each other. So if I want to get really deep into a conspiracy theory, I can, and I don’t have to see anything that’s critical of it necessarily. And the sort of the way that people can shield themselves from information today, I don’t like it. I don’t like that part.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Yeah, we really are just all in our own little bubbles.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, and I think that, you know, one of the things, probably the most meaningful thing that helps us to realize that we’re not the only person who exists in the world is not what we consume, but how we interact with each other. And that feels like something that a lot of people have to put real effort in trying to just be around other human beings. Um, and I guess that’s the promise of Satanism too, you know, they’re just, they’re like always getting large groups of people together to do a hobby. It’s really very impressive.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Pickleball really is just Satanism. That’ll be the new danger.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s the takeaway from this conversation. Yeah, look, anything that people adopt that quickly, I do feel a little suspicious about. I got to be honest.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> So queer people are still largely the target of these moral panic campaigns, particularly trans people. And back then the panic was over children and satanic ritual abuse cults, and now it’s over children who have access to gender affirming care. What Mechanisms are being rehashed here, like, what nachos are being reheated?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh God, not very bad nachos, just stay away from the nachos. But I, I mean, I think that what’s, what’s kind of interesting is that in many ways we’ve cut out the middle man and taught people not to fear for their child, but just to fear their child, you know, and to feel that, if your child starts living as as their identity tells them to, in terms of gender or in terms of any aspect of belief, questioning your belief system, then they become your enemy, it seems like in a lot of the rhetoric that we’re seeing today.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so this idea that your child who you love, that that love you feel for them is allowed culturally and really encouraged, I think at this point to become weaponized, into that same amount of anger if they don’t become the person that you’re trying to mold them into. That to me is so scary.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I like to think that some of these people know that what they’re doing is wrong, because like the the degree of child abuse sanctioned by some Christian religious authorities in this country has been absolutely shocking, puts, you know, the satanic panic stories to shame and it’s led to the death of like an appreciable number of children, you know. And I like to think that you have to at least maybe know what you’re doing is wrong in order to become so obsessed with accusing Satanists of it, but I’ve always overestimated the American mind when it comes to self-awareness.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What advice do you have for people to avoid falling into the same moral panic cycle?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I will say that none of us are above moral panicking, you know, it’s, there’s a, there’s a lot worth panicking about, but I would say just by staying curious, you know. I think that a lot of how the satanic panic spread and had people as credulous as it did is that it really discouraged any kind of asking of questions even about very reasonable concrete things that were seemingly impossible in many cases, but through the magic of Satan, you know. There’s never any physical evidence. Why? Satan, OK.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s so much more likely that it’s the person who’s right there in society, in a, in a position of relative power who’s, who’s doing harm than some perhaps mythical figure off in the shadows somewhere. We just, we have enough to cope with with the, with the people we can already see, you know. And there’s a, there’s a lot of, of, people in power who get to stay in power longer by making it seem like there’s a bigger threat to our safety than they actively are while in Congress or whatever.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So are Labubus demonic tools of Satan’s witchcraft? No. Fear mongering over trendy dolls is easy to write off as a silly harmless conspiracy theory, but it’s part of a larger, more pervasive moral panic that incites fear and anger and hate at any perceived threat to the status quo. And like the satanic panic 40 years ago, the so-called threats are more often than not, queer and trans people.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you peel back the layers, the fear of children bringing home demonic plushies isn’t that different from the fear of drag queens reading picture books to children. What we’re seeing play out today isn’t necessarily a new satanic panic. It’s the same tactics preying on the same fear of breaking from tradition. It’s just packaged a little differently and adapted for the internet.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There are real consequences to acting on this fear. What starts as seemingly harmless can expand and become extremely destructive. We’re seeing how this fear continues to endanger and disenfranchise queer people today. But we’ve seen how satanic panic spread, and we don’t have to fall for it again and that starts by learning how to spot the signs of it, from silly Labubu conspiracy theories to the videos that prey on our fears and anxieties in order to go viral.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">OK, now let’s close all these tabs.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sarah’s series, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Devil You Know\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, is out now! For me, as someone who loves horror movies, learning about this era of history was fascinating, and it’s out just in time for Halloween. Turns out the real horror was … well, you’ll find out more when you listen. You can find \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Devil You Know\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> wherever you get your podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Chris Egusa and edited by Chris Hambrick. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our senior editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s director of podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Our theme song and credits are by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Brendan Willard is our Audio Engineer. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our editor in chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dust Silver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Also, we want to hear from you! Send us an email at CloseAllTabs@KQED.org. Follow us on Instagram @CloseAllTabsPod, or on TikTok @CloseAllTabs.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Journalist Sarah Marshall joins Close All Tabs to dig into how a new generation of “satanic panic” has gone digital.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1761097898,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 118,
"wordCount": 5349
},
"headData": {
"title": "Satanic Panic in the Age of the Internet | KQED",
"description": "What do colorful and plush Labubu dolls have in common with Mesopotamian mythology? If you believe some viral TikToks, everything. Recent conspiracy theories have linked the toys to everything from ancient demonic spirits to Satan worship. But behind those ideas flooding online feeds is something older and darker: the return of moral panic. In this episode, host Morgan Sung digs into how a new generation of “satanic panic” has gone digital, from fears of occult rituals in song to online crusades against queer and trans people. Journalist Sarah Marshall, host of the new podcast series The Devil You Know, joins Morgan to help trace how misinformation and moral outrage keep recycling the same fears — just with new villains.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "What do colorful and plush Labubu dolls have in common with Mesopotamian mythology? If you believe some viral TikToks, everything. Recent conspiracy theories have linked the toys to everything from ancient demonic spirits to Satan worship. But behind those ideas flooding online feeds is something older and darker: the return of moral panic. In this episode, host Morgan Sung digs into how a new generation of “satanic panic” has gone digital, from fears of occult rituals in song to online crusades against queer and trans people. Journalist Sarah Marshall, host of the new podcast series The Devil You Know, joins Morgan to help trace how misinformation and moral outrage keep recycling the same fears — just with new villains.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Satanic Panic in the Age of the Internet",
"datePublished": "2025-10-22T03:00:00-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-10-21T18:51:38-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC7641922375.mp3?updated=1761096354",
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12060973/satanic-panic-in-the-age-of-the-internet",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"#episode-transcript\">\u003ci>View the full episode transcript.\u003c/i>\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What do colorful and plush Labubu dolls have in common with Mesopotamian mythology? If you believe some viral TikToks, everything. Recent conspiracy theories have linked the toys to everything from ancient demonic spirits to Satan worship. But behind those ideas flooding online feeds is something older and darker: the return of moral panic. In this episode, host Morgan Sung digs into how a new generation of “satanic panic” has gone digital, from fears of occult rituals in song to online crusades against queer and trans people. Journalist Sarah Marshall, host of the new podcast series The Devil You Know, joins Morgan to help trace how misinformation and moral outrage keep recycling the same fears — just with new villains. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm?e=KQINC7641922375\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.remembersarahmarshall.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sarah Marshall\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, journalist and host of the \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’re Wrong About \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">podcast\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://app.magellan.ai/listen_links/Qub2Qv\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Devil You Know with Sarah Marshall\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">CBC Podcasts\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://yourewrongabout.buzzsprout.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’re Wrong About\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">podcast\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Sarah Marshall\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/culture/23025505/leftist-groomers-homophobia-satanic-panic-explained\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The right’s moral panic over “grooming” invokes age-old homophobia\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Aja Romano, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Vox\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.cbc.ca/arts/satan-wants-you-filmmakers-q-a-sean-horlor-steve-j-adams-1.6822213\">The strange origins of the Satanic Panic: How one Canadian book started a worldwide witch hunt\u003c/a> — Leah Collins, \u003ci>CBC Arts\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Host, Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just a note – this episode includes mentions of sexual abuse, so listen with care.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So Labubus blew up this year, right? They’re the super trendy, colorful little blind box plushies.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The dolls, which are usually listed for $22 are now in some cases fetching hundreds of dollars on resale sites.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But is there something darker hiding behind these collectible plushies? Something demonic?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Look beyond the little sharp teeth, the little mischievous grin and those little eyes, these names can be linked to ancient spirits.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On top of that, there’s an actual demon named Pezuzu, which sounds very similar to Labubu.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s a real demon from Mesopotamian mythology. It’s about plagues, chaos, and fear.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Y’all, when I say different toys that give you the hey jeebies or you feel that nudge in your spirit, it is warning you to not open up the door and allow that demonic spirit into your home.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> People have gone super viral by claiming that they unwittingly bought their child a little boo boo, only for it to spiritually terrorize their family.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Others are pulling up Bible verses about Satan’s disguises, which apparently now includes super trendy collectibles with exorbitant resale value.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TikTok Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. That particular verse means that he doesn’t come with horns or fire, but he can come marketed and gift wrapped and trendy just as these dolls do.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This kind of moral fear mongering is not new. Back in the 80s, it was known as the satanic panic.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Members of satanic or occult groups share common traits such as the access to perform perverted sex acts, such as homosexuality, bisexuality, sodomy, bestiality, and necrophilia. All of these acts are carried out in the name of Satan.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">KABC Devil Worship \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When kids will do their, their sacrificing and their animal mutilation, they’ll do it within a pentagram, and allow the blood to drip into some kind of container because they use it for bathing in or drinking.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Today, we’re seeing the same moral fear mongering take place online. Once, some people thought Furbys were the devil’s toy. Now it’s Labubus.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Journalist Sarah Marshall has been trying to understand why these cycles keep repeating.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Guest, Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m Sarah Marshall. I host a podcast called You’re Wrong About\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> about misremembered history.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> And now she has a new show called The Devil You Know. It’s a CBC podcast miniseries about the satanic panic.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, do you think Labubus are demonic?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it depends on how you use the word demonic. I think one of the questions that I try to look at in the show and also want us all to look at in this time of rolling satanic panics is like, what are people using the words Satan to mean?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because there’s a good solid slice of that pie chart, I think throughout history is anything that we don’t like and want to vilify as strongly and as quickly as we possibly can.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so at the time I was first learning about this, it felt like something the country hadn’t reckoned with yet, and it was very shocking to me, and feels much less shocking now because we’re doing it again after all this time.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sarah’s new miniseries got me thinking about what satanic panic looks like in the digital age, beyond Labubu conspiracy theories. As somewhat of an expert in this particular moment in history, Sarah is going to explain how satanic panic spread so quickly. And what to look out for to avoid falling for it again.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ready?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To understand the way fear mongering spreads online and targets innocent people, we have to go back in time by opening a new tab: What was the satanic panic?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Picture this: The year is 1980. The North American Mall is thriving.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s the golden age of arcades, VCRs are the hot new thing, and there’s big hair and acid washed jeans. Oh, and seems like Satan is lurking around every corner, because a rapidly spreading fear is taking hold of North America, that satanic cults are indoctrinating and ritually abusing children.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s a bunch of kind of roots to that phenomenon, but a really big moment is the publication of a book in 1980 called \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Michelle Remembers,\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> where a woman goes through what I have always imagined to be hypnotherapy. I have no confirmation of this, but she ends up in some kind of trance-like state that her therapist puts her in. And he develops the idea very quickly that she has been abused by a satanic coven.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ultimately, the story ends up being a very sensational bestseller, and then it’s treated as a textbook by police and by therapists and so on who are learning how to recognize child abuse and who are told that satanic abuse is the kind they should really be looking for and things really take off from there.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Like you said, there are these major cultural flashpoints that sparked this massive panic. There was \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Michelle Remembers\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, and then there’s the McMartin preschool trial, which is this highly publicized case investigating claims of child sexual abuse in the 80s.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Newsclip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The allegations went beyond sexual molestation. They were tales of satanic rites, of pornographic pictures, of the mutilation of animals to frighten the children into silence.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But from the beginning, the defendants in the case, the teachers, have insisted that they were the victims of a latter day witch hunt.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then throughout the series, you also connect the spread of satanic panic to the progressive direction that culture was moving in. How did marginalized groups gaining rights suddenly lead to satanic panic? Like, what’s the bigger cultural context here?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, ironically, so much of this appears actually to be a backlash to the idea of people getting out from under the thumb of some of the more dangerous aspects of American Christianity, you know, and this idea of women’s liberation is a very recent phenomenon. We’ve successfully struck down the ERA in the United States, of course, but it was still, still a real concern as the 80s started that women might get real rights at some point.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By ERA, Sarah’s talking about the Equal Rights Amendment, a proposed amendment to prohibit sex-based discrimination.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was passed by Congress in 1972, but then it was sent to the states to be ratified. Religious groups and conservatives stalled the process.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gay liberation is also a movement that’s underway, and so I think it’s always pretty easy to sell to people the idea, like, wouldn’t it be nice if you didn’t have to accept your kid as who they were? Wouldn’t it be great if you could just say that the Satanists were making them do that? You know, I think that’s a big part of the sales point for this.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That explains some of the cultural context.The media landscape also played a huge part in fueling satanic panic. In 1987, the fairness doctrine ended.That was the FCC policy that required broadcasters to present different perspectives when reporting on any issues of public importance.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When the fairness doctrine ended, local TV stations went all out with sensationalized reporting and pretty much no fact checking.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think one of them is that historically, you know, to my understanding, if you’re, if you’re working in media really at any level locally or nationally, you have been allowed to say, well, the police said this, so that’s probably true, you know, like only very recently has it become, I think, to any degree normalized to even early on in the conversation, be like, well, the police say this, but they’re just one of many sources, you know, by, by American journalism for quite a long time.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There was an area in Ohio where law enforcement wasted an astounding amount of money searching for the mass grave of satanic sacrifices that they believe just had to be there because somebody had found a little piece of red thread hanging off a tree limb and was like, well, that’s got to be Satanists.Who else could, no non-Satanist could put thread in a tree like this. And there’s, you know, and they didn’t find anything, arguably because there was nothing there.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s kind of a horror story about what happens when we give the police too much power and credibility. And also, as you can imagine, and it’s hard in many ways to fault people for this-In…if you’re working in media and you’ve got to try and get your story on air and maybe, you know, you’re trying to advance your career, you’re trying to get places, there is nothing that will make people stay on your channel more than saying satanic sacrifice, you know, it’s just, it’s hard to beat that.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, how profitable was the satanic panic machine?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Man, I don’t have numbers in front of me, but I mean, if you look at the kind of media that was on TV throughout the 80s and into the 90s, it just spread like wildfire through, through primetime news and also through daytime TV because this is a time of like many competing talk shows on TV. Oprah was kind of getting her sea legs at this point, and I think every single one of them covered satanic cults at some point in the 80s. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For example, the author of \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Satan’s Underground \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">was uncovered very thoroughly. As an acknowledged fraudster who once she got tired of pretending to be a satanic abuse survivor, started pretending to be a Holocaust survivor. Um, and so it also became over time like really fertile ground for con artists. So it’s just there’s kind of something for everyone in this.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you are pure of heart, it gives you something really important to put your energy behind and if you just want to scam people or get attention, you can also do that. And if you want to scare adults, you can paint a pentagram on something you can have that as well, and boy did they freak out when they saw those.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Satanic panic often targeted people who didn’t fit into society’s mold, who didn’t abide by traditional values. They weren’t into the occults, they were just different. And more often than not, the targets of satanic panic were queer, like in the case of the San Antonio Four. That was a group of four friends who were all openly lesbian in Texas in the mid-90s.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the women hosted her two nieces for a weeklong visit in 1994.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The nieces, who were 7 and 9 at the time, accused the group of sexually abusing them as part of a satanic ritual. The ensuing media frenzy and the prosecutors portrayed the group as a perverse lesbian cult, indoctrinating and sacrificing little girls.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The women were convicted and spent nearly 15 years in prison before one of the nieces recanted her testimony. She admitted that she had been coached into accusing her aunt and her friends because her family was upset that her aunt was a lesbian. Satanic panic was laced with homophobia from the start, and that was true in the case of the San Antonio Four.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, at the core of this case, we have this, to me, just so intensely bittersweet story of these four young women who are able to kind of create a safe home for each other and their children and who were accused of organized and ritualistic child abuse by a male family member who had a grudge against one of these young women for resisting his advances, you know. And so I think one of the things it shows is that by the 1990s, when this case took place, and into the 2000s, but when all this began, you could argue that, some men might have figured out that accusing a woman who got in your way or who didn’t do what you wanted her to, especially a queer woman, of child abuse or ritualistic abuse or satanism, that that was maybe going to be very useful to you, because we had created through the satanic panic, this idea that if you were queer, you are much more likely to be one of these Satanists.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Um and again, that was also a way for mainstream culture to Pretend to not notice that the majority of people committing child sexual abuse are men who the child knows already. We had to sort of figure out an opposite direction to put our energy in so we could keep ignoring the real problem, I think, in some ways. And so it’s just It becomes a very useful myth, and it’s very scary to see that in action.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Does any of this sound familiar to you: Scary gay people, grooming and indoctrinating children?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[News Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Critics are tearing into a drag story time for toddlers held at a public library.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[News Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The library told a local news site that there wasn’t any sexualized content planned for this drag storytime.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> We don’t always call it the satanic panic today, but this moral fear mongering and backlash against marginalized communities isn’t all that different. We’ll dive into that after this break.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The San Antonio 4 case started just before I was born, and the openly lesbian women who were wrongfully accused and convicted of satanic ritual abuse, weren’t exonerated until I was in my 20s. In pop culture, satanic panic seems like an era of cultural history that happened decades ago, before it was neatly wrapped up and put to rest. But in reality, echoes of satanic panic still exist today, and thanks to the internet, that fear mongering is more insidious than ever. Let’s talk about what it looks like in a new tab: The new satanic panic.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Did satanic panic ever really die out?\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There was a time when I would have said it did, and now I’m like, no, yeah, it’s still there. It’s like when you go camping and they’re like, please dowse your campfires. Please just pour so much water on them and stare at them for a long time. And sometimes, you know, the American legal system is like, I think that’s fine, let’s just go home. And then it just sort of like just keeps smoldering away. And I think that nothing has been more helpful in its desire to to spread and grow and become as big as it once was, than the Trump administration, as, as you might imagine. Surprise!\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Let’s cover the satanic panic of today. I mean, there’s obviously the conservative backlash to provocative art, like, I’m thinking of Cynthia Erivo playing Jesus and Jesus Christ Superstar, and then it goes a little further where people were convinced that Lady Gaga’s Coachella performance, which had like occult references and biblical imagery.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lady Gaga has been blaspheming Jesus for basically her entire career.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lady Gaga is a practicing witch and has been very open about the spell that she is casting and the hex that she is casting in her song Abracadabra.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People genuinely thought that was a satanic ritual, but moral panics aren’t always as overt as that. I mean, they’re not, oh my God, this thing is demonic, this labubu equals Pazuzu kind of situation. What are the more subtle moral panics you’ve seen recently?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think one of them that seems, and this is my personal diagnosis of a moral panic, or kind of an aspect of our satanic panic of today, because the anxiety parents feel over trans kids in school sports, which is something that I, you know, personally believe politicians whipped up out of really the clear blue sky in order to give them something to do.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And this idea that your child is somehow more in danger from another child on their soccer team than they are from, again, the adult men in the world generally who they already know.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so it’s so interesting that we always have the search for theoretical Satanists who are always just kind of right out of reach when megalomaniacal white men have always been right there, front and center.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Yeah, in the series, you dive into this concept of moral entrepreneurship. What is that? And how does that connect to the kind of more insidious, quieter moral panic that we’re seeing today, that isn’t strictly like, look at Satan?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, you know, a classic example that many of us have probably seen at this point is one of these like very cheesy 80s, how to spot Satanism in your community, you know, law enforcement training videos.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip from \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Law Enforcement Guide to Satanic Cults\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In satanic occultism, that which is good is bad and that which is bad is good, and as you view this learning and educational tape, pay attention to notice the reverse of everything that is normal becoming abnormal.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think one of the things the satanic panic did that I think we’re seeing today and what pops to mind for me is, you know, some of the really fraudulent businesses that have been built around our fear of human trafficking and sort of creating in people the idea that human trafficking, you know, and which in reality is about wage theft and about undocumented workers, you know, being enslaved essentially, and that’s typically how it, I think happens statistically most often. But which is reinvented into a theory that, like, 37 year old white women such as myself are going to get kidnapped at Michael’s, you know, and, and be put on a slave ship, which is something white women love to think about ourselves inexplicably.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think that there’s, there’s this idea in the 80s satanic panic and that we’re very much seeing today that it’s so nice to be able to get rich and be the ultimate hero protecting women and children from violence and Satanism. At the same time, it offers what feels like a virtuous heroic way to make so much money.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> I mean, speaking of those anti-trafficking videos or those like warning, there’s a creepy guy in the Michael’s parking lot stalking women. Like I, I always watch so many of those and like I, it gets to the end, you know, they’re showing all the different ways to protect yourself against these scary faceless people, and it gets to the end and I’m like, oh, it was an ad. You’re selling me, you’re selling me a product to supposedly protect myself.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve seen those too, yes, and that’s so depressing that they, yeah, that there’s a real, real push to commodify women’s fear. And yeah, and it’s always like if if you come back to your car and someone’s taped a banana to the door, never eat that banana, it’s like, well, I could have known that.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Yeah. So how do moral panic spread today? What goes into feeding them?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, things were volatile enough in the 80s when we had at the time, this what felt very instantaneous form of spread of information through cable news and through magazines and papers and and things like that. And now, of course, I mean, our, the lifespan of all of our trends is like 20 minutes, you know, and so we, the way that misinformation can spread around the world.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it feels to me like there’s some kind of unwritten law that misinformation must always be faster than information. And I don’t know why, but there is, there is the adage that, you know, a lie can spread around the world before the truth can get its shoes on. And now that time is, is even shorter, I would say.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think it’s, you know, just in social media, whether people are attempting to tell the truth or not, there’s a real bias towards what we know will get people’s attention, and, you know, if it bleeds it leads famously. And if it bleeds from a little Satanist dagger, then then that’s even better.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I, I think to me, one of the big problems, and this does feel very different from the satanic panic of the 80s, is that we now exist in our very own little media worlds most of the time, you know. It’s one of the things that’s so unsettling about the satanic panic of the 80s, is that everybody was watching the same nightly news and hearing the same stories, but I think, currently it worries me even more that today you have, you know, people walking around in their very own pockets of information and not even having to consume the same media as each other. So if I want to get really deep into a conspiracy theory, I can, and I don’t have to see anything that’s critical of it necessarily. And the sort of the way that people can shield themselves from information today, I don’t like it. I don’t like that part.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Yeah, we really are just all in our own little bubbles.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, and I think that, you know, one of the things, probably the most meaningful thing that helps us to realize that we’re not the only person who exists in the world is not what we consume, but how we interact with each other. And that feels like something that a lot of people have to put real effort in trying to just be around other human beings. Um, and I guess that’s the promise of Satanism too, you know, they’re just, they’re like always getting large groups of people together to do a hobby. It’s really very impressive.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Pickleball really is just Satanism. That’ll be the new danger.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s the takeaway from this conversation. Yeah, look, anything that people adopt that quickly, I do feel a little suspicious about. I got to be honest.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> So queer people are still largely the target of these moral panic campaigns, particularly trans people. And back then the panic was over children and satanic ritual abuse cults, and now it’s over children who have access to gender affirming care. What Mechanisms are being rehashed here, like, what nachos are being reheated?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh God, not very bad nachos, just stay away from the nachos. But I, I mean, I think that what’s, what’s kind of interesting is that in many ways we’ve cut out the middle man and taught people not to fear for their child, but just to fear their child, you know, and to feel that, if your child starts living as as their identity tells them to, in terms of gender or in terms of any aspect of belief, questioning your belief system, then they become your enemy, it seems like in a lot of the rhetoric that we’re seeing today.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so this idea that your child who you love, that that love you feel for them is allowed culturally and really encouraged, I think at this point to become weaponized, into that same amount of anger if they don’t become the person that you’re trying to mold them into. That to me is so scary.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I like to think that some of these people know that what they’re doing is wrong, because like the the degree of child abuse sanctioned by some Christian religious authorities in this country has been absolutely shocking, puts, you know, the satanic panic stories to shame and it’s led to the death of like an appreciable number of children, you know. And I like to think that you have to at least maybe know what you’re doing is wrong in order to become so obsessed with accusing Satanists of it, but I’ve always overestimated the American mind when it comes to self-awareness.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What advice do you have for people to avoid falling into the same moral panic cycle?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Sarah Marshall: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I will say that none of us are above moral panicking, you know, it’s, there’s a, there’s a lot worth panicking about, but I would say just by staying curious, you know. I think that a lot of how the satanic panic spread and had people as credulous as it did is that it really discouraged any kind of asking of questions even about very reasonable concrete things that were seemingly impossible in many cases, but through the magic of Satan, you know. There’s never any physical evidence. Why? Satan, OK.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s so much more likely that it’s the person who’s right there in society, in a, in a position of relative power who’s, who’s doing harm than some perhaps mythical figure off in the shadows somewhere. We just, we have enough to cope with with the, with the people we can already see, you know. And there’s a, there’s a lot of, of, people in power who get to stay in power longer by making it seem like there’s a bigger threat to our safety than they actively are while in Congress or whatever.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So are Labubus demonic tools of Satan’s witchcraft? No. Fear mongering over trendy dolls is easy to write off as a silly harmless conspiracy theory, but it’s part of a larger, more pervasive moral panic that incites fear and anger and hate at any perceived threat to the status quo. And like the satanic panic 40 years ago, the so-called threats are more often than not, queer and trans people.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you peel back the layers, the fear of children bringing home demonic plushies isn’t that different from the fear of drag queens reading picture books to children. What we’re seeing play out today isn’t necessarily a new satanic panic. It’s the same tactics preying on the same fear of breaking from tradition. It’s just packaged a little differently and adapted for the internet.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There are real consequences to acting on this fear. What starts as seemingly harmless can expand and become extremely destructive. We’re seeing how this fear continues to endanger and disenfranchise queer people today. But we’ve seen how satanic panic spread, and we don’t have to fall for it again and that starts by learning how to spot the signs of it, from silly Labubu conspiracy theories to the videos that prey on our fears and anxieties in order to go viral.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">OK, now let’s close all these tabs.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sarah’s series, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Devil You Know\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, is out now! For me, as someone who loves horror movies, learning about this era of history was fascinating, and it’s out just in time for Halloween. Turns out the real horror was … well, you’ll find out more when you listen. You can find \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Devil You Know\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> wherever you get your podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Chris Egusa and edited by Chris Hambrick. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our senior editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s director of podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Our theme song and credits are by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Brendan Willard is our Audio Engineer. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our editor in chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dust Silver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Also, we want to hear from you! Send us an email at CloseAllTabs@KQED.org. Follow us on Instagram @CloseAllTabsPod, or on TikTok @CloseAllTabs.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12060973/satanic-panic-in-the-age-of-the-internet",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11832",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_22973",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_35689",
"news_1089"
],
"featImg": "news_12060977",
"label": "source_news_12060973"
},
"news_12059911": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12059911",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12059911",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1760522453000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "beyond-the-ai-hype-machine",
"title": "Beyond the AI Hype Machine",
"publishDate": 1760522453,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Beyond the AI Hype Machine | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"#episode-transcript\">\u003ci>View the full episode transcript.\u003c/i>\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When ChatGPT launched in 2022, it kicked off what some have called the “AI hype machine” — a frenzy of promotion and investment that has sent some tech companies’ valuations soaring to record heights. Meanwhile, computational linguist Emily M. Bender and AI researcher and sociologist Alex Hanna have proudly worn the titles of “AI hype busters,” critiquing the industry’s loftiest claims and pointing out the real-world harms behind this wave of excitement. What began as a satirical podcast is now a book, \u003c/span>\u003ca href=\"https://thecon.ai/\">\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The AI Con\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">:\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">. In this episode, Alex and Emily explain why the very term “AI” is misleading, how AI boosters and doomers are really flip sides of the same coin, and why we should question the AI inevitability narrative. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC5696998106\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/emilymbender.bsky.social\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emily Bender\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, professor of linguistics the University of Washington\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/alexhanna.bsky.social\">Alex Hanna\u003c/a>, director of research at the Distributed AI Research Institute\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://thecon.ai/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Emily Bender and Alex Hanna\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.dair-institute.org/maiht3k/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 Podcast\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.techpolicy.press/ai-hurts-consumers-and-workers-and-isnt-intelligent/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">“AI” Hurts Consumers and Workers — and Isn’t Intelligent\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Emily Bender and Alex Hanna, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Tech Policy Press\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://lithub.com/on-the-very-real-dangers-of-the-artificial-intelligence-hype-machine/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the Very Real Dangers of the Artificial Intelligence Hype Machine: Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna Explore AI History, the Cold War, and a Fatally Overhyped Idea \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Emily M. Bender, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">LitHub\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.404media.co/sora-2-content-violation-guardrails-error/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People Are Crashing Out Over Sora 2’s New Guardrails\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Samantha Cole, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">404 Media\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sora-2-financial-problem\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sora 2 Has a Huge Financial Problem\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Victor Tangermann, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Futurism\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116327/ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard.\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — James O’Donnell and Casey Crownhart, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">MIT Technology Review\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A few weeks ago, OpenAI launched an app, Sora. It’s a vertical video social platform, similar to TikTok, except all the videos are generated by the company’s AI image generator, Sora 2. Within days, the app was a copyright infringement nightmare. There were videos of SpongeBob cooking meth, unsanctioned Rick and Morty ads for crypto startups, and many, many videos of open AI CEO Sam Altman doing depraved things to copyrighted characters. Like the one where he brutally barbecues and carves up Pikachu. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[AI CEO Sam Altman] Pikachu on the grill here. It’s already got a beautiful char and it smells like somebody plugged in a chicken. Let’s give it a flip. I’m gonna carve it into some thick steaks. Look at that. Crust on the outside, pink and juicy in the middle. Cheers.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of these 10 second videos require an immense amount of computing power, which is extremely costly to maintain. In a blog post, Sam Altman admitted that the company still needs to figure out how to make money off of Sora. He wrote, “People are generating much more than we expected per user, and a lot of videos are being generated for very small audiences.” Facing heat from copyright holders like Disney and Nintendo, Altman also announced extra guardrails for the app to curb infringement. Now, users are complaining that everything they try to generate using Sora 2 gets flagged as a violation of the copyrighted content policy. They’re already getting bored of the app. This whole cycle has been described as the AI hype machine. Big investments are made based on big promises of innovation, disruption, revolution. This hype fuels more investment, which, in turn, fuels the hype. The cycle continues when a new product launches. Meta, for example, launched its own AI social video app, called Vibes, last month too, which was quickly forgotten about when Sora launched. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">AI hype is effectively premised on fear of missing out. It is the fear that if you don’t get onto this new technology, you are going to be left behind. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s Alex Hanna, a sociologist and the Director of Research at the Distributed AI Research Institute. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you’re a corporate manager, you’re going to have your competitors just leave you in the dust. If you are a teacher, you are doing a disservice to your students by not preparing them for the job market of the future. If you were a student, you were going to miss out on all the skills and all your classmates are going to be outperforming you. And as a worker, you will be doing things the old way, the analog way, and everyone is going to be outpacing you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Alex and her co-author, Emily M. Bender, recently published a book, The AI Con, How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want. Emily runs the computational linguistics program at the University of Washington. This is a field of study that combines human language with machine learning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I often get asked the question, well aren’t you worried that students are going to get left behind? Etc. And my answer to that is often, where is everybody going? Like, this metaphor of left behind suggests that people are running off into some brilliant future. I just don’t see it, you know, setting aside the fact that the technology doesn’t do what it’s being sold to do, but that is overhyped and over promised. The idea that we’d be better off with instead of interacting with people at all stages, interacting with screens that that’s just not the future that I want. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this episode, we’re talking about the AI hype machine, when it started, how it’s fed, and why a growing corner of critics say they see right through it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All right, like we always do, we’re starting by opening a new tab. What is P-Doom? In their book, The AI Con, Alex and Emily talk about these two groups. There are the AI boosters, the people who are optimistic that AI will pave the way to our utopian future. Then there are the AI doomers: the people that catastrophize, and believe that AI progress will usher in an era of societal collapse and human extinction. It’s very Matrix. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip from the film “The Matrix] The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But before we break this down further, let’s start by defining our terms. Here’s Emily. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Artificial intelligence does not refer to a coherent set of technologies, and it has throughout its history, since it was coined by John McCarthy in 1955, basically been used to sell this idea of some magic do-everything technology in order to get money. Initially, it was research funding and then DOD money and now a lot of it is venture capital money. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, and the way that this has proliferated in the modern day is that so many things get called AI. So that could be automated decision-making systems used for determining whether someone gets social services. And so that gets looped in, and then we also get recommendation systems, things like the TikTok algorithm, the Instagram Reels algorithm, pick your short-form video. But then, it’s really manifest in these large language models and diffusion models that are looped into the category of generative AI.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You start this book from this one moment in 2023, when Chuck Schumer at the time, the Senate majority leader, held a series of forums around AI. Can you take us back to that moment and like set the scene for us? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, late 2023, Chuck Schumer is convening the eighth of total nine Senate Insight forums around AI, and he asks folks, this is very weird, he asks, “what is folks’ probability of doom?” And this is abbreviated as P(doom), and for this instance, it’s an audio platform, that is P, open parentheses, doom, closed parentheses. And he also asked, “what people’s pee hope is.” So this means what is your probability that there’s going to be some kind of a doom scenario, in which through, you know, hook or crook, some kind of thing called AI is going to outperform or outsmart humans and take over and lead to human extinction. And in the book, we start and we say, well, this is the wrong question. But also if you’re looking at harms that are happening in the here and now, there are many that exist, whether that be deep fake porn being made out of non-consensual adults and children, the use of automated decision-making and weapons targeting, especially in Gaza, and then we also talk about students having their exams effectively being judged by these automated tools. So talking about P(doom) in this register is asking the wrong question and focusing on the wrong things. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But oftentimes it looks like the doomers, the people with a high P(doom) value, the people who take that question seriously in the first place, um, and the boosters, the people who say this is gonna solve all our problems, are like the opposite ends of a spectrum. And that is how these people present themselves, it is how the media often presents what’s going on, and it is very misleading. I think that one of the points that we make is that doomerism is another kind of AI hype, because it’s saying, our system is very powerful. It’s so powerful, it’s going to kill us all, is a way of saying it’s very powerful, but also we make the point that the doomers and the boosters are two sides of the same coin. And it, I think, becomes very clear if you look at it this way, which is to say, the doomers say, “AI is a thing, it’s imminent, it’s inevitable, and it’s gonna kill us all.” And the boosters say, “AI’s a thing, it’s imminent, it’s inevitable, and it is gonna solve all of our problems.” And it’s pretty easy to see these are the same position with just a different twist at the end. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the funny thing about this boosterism, doomerism dichotomy is that these are many of the same people or they run in many of same circles. So, you know, there was this document that was put out called AI 2027, in which it ends with humanity dying and the kind of choose your own adventure. There’s only two endings here. The choose your own adventure and one of them, you know everyone dies. But the lead author of this works at OpenAI. And there’s many such cases of people who are working on quote unquote, “AI alignment”, who are in these industries. So, it’s again not as if they’re against the building of AI, or we should just say no, it’s actually a very narrow segment of people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You described this industry as the AI hype machine, the modern AI hype machine, what does it look like? I mean, who are the players? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, the players are many of the big tech players that we know. So Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, but with some new entrants, OpenAI being the most significant one. Um, and along with OpenAI, a few offshoots, so Anthropic is kind of the most notable one. And then the company that’s creating the shovels for the gold rush, so that’s your Nvidia, and then your Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturing company, abbreviated as TSMC. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I want to say that we see AI hype not just originating from those big players, like that is a large source of it. Also we hear over and over and again about people working in various businesses being told by their higher ups that they have to try this new AI thing. And so there’s this sort of secondary promulgation of hype that comes from middle management and up that have been sold on the idea that this is going to, you know, really increase productivity. And, you know, on the one hand, it’s a very useful excuse for doing layoffs that they may have otherwise already wanted to do, but then on the other hand, some people seem to have really bought into the idea. So they tell the people working for them, you have to spend time figuring out how to make yourself more productive by using these so-called AI tools, because everyone’s telling me that that’s the way of the future. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, the obvious way people are, these players, are feeding into the AI hype machine is by extolling the virtues of AI, or, you know, kind of spreading this very doomerous sci-fi rhetoric. But what other strategies are being used to feed this machine? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So one important strategy is what I sometimes call citations to the future. So people will say, yeah, yeah. It’s got problems now, but it’s going to do all of these things. And I think it really is the only technology that we are expected to evaluate based on promises of what it will be doing, right? That car that I just bought only gets, you know, 35 miles to the gallon. But that’s OK, because the later one’s going to get 50. We don’t talk about it that way, except with the so-called AI technology.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So, citations to the future is one big strategy and another one is anthropomorphizing language, talking about things that have happened as if the computer systems themselves did it of their own volition and autonomously instead of people having used the system to do it or done something in order to build the system. So it’ll be something like, AI needs lots and lots of data. Well, no, people who want to build the system that they’re calling AI are amassing lots and lots of data in order to build them, or AI is thirsty, it needs lots of water, or AI was able to identify, you know, something in a blurry image. It’s like — in no sense, right? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People used XYZ tool in order do a thing, or in order to build these tools, they are using lots of of water and so on. So this anthropomorphizing language sort of shifts the people out of the frame and hides a bunch of accountability, and at the same time, makes the systems sound cooler than they are. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Alex and Emily also pointed out that players in the AI industry push this adoption of AI into our everyday lives by really trying to humanize the product. We’re gonna dive into that in a new tab. First, a quick break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Time for a new tab! Are we really just meat machines?\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the technology itself, like the way people talk about large language models as AI, um, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok. Many people understand that these models are basically predicting the words that most often go together. But can you break it down further? Like, what’s really going on under the hood there? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, the first very important lesson is that when we say word, we’re actually talking about two things. We’re talking about the way the word is spelled and pronounced and what it is used to mean. And one thing that makes that hard to keep in mind is that as proficient speakers of the languages we speak, pretty much anytime we encounter the spelling or sound of a word, we are also encountering what the person using it is using it to talk about. And so we always experience the form and meaning together. But a language model, so that the core component of something like Gemini or Grok or Claude or ChatGPT is literally a system for modeling which bits of words go with which other bits of words in whatever the input collection of text was to create that model. And so what we have are models that are very good at putting literally like spellings of parts of words next to each other in a way that looks like something somebody might say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emily and Alex have come up with a few phrases that illustrate what large language models really are, which also describe the limitations of this tech. We’ve got synthetic text extruding machine. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The choice of the word extrude is very intentional because it’s a little gross. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Racist pile of linear algebra. Spicy autocomplete. And one phrase that really took off, stochastic parrot. Emily coined the phrase in a research paper she co-authored in 2020. Parrots can mimic human speech, but whether they can really comprehend it, that’s dubious. Stochastic comes from probability theory. It means randomly determined. So a stochastic parrot essentially mimics language in a random order and does so convincingly, but it doesn’t understand it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Starting with OpenAI’s GPT-2 and GPT3, they were using it to create synthetic text. And so one of the things we worried about in that paper is what happens if someone comes across synthetic text and doesn’t know that it was synthetic? What we didn’t realize at the time is that people would be happy to look at synthetic text while knowing that it’s synthetic. That is very surprising to me. And so the phrase stochastic parrots was this attempt to make vivid what’s going on, to help people understand why the output of a language model run to repeatedly answer the question, what’s a likely next word, is not the same thing as text produced by a person or group of people with something to communicate. And what’s happened, it’s been fascinating as a linguist to watch that phrase go out into the world, so for the first little while, it was people referring to the paper, and then it sort of became people talking about, um, that claim that large language models are not understanding, they’re just repeatedly predicting a likely next word. And then it got picked up or interpreted as an insult, which is surprising to me because in order for it to be an insult, the thing that it’s being applied to would have to the kind of thing that could be insulted. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Then in 2022, Sam Altman tweeted, I am a stochastic parrot and so are you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think what happens when Sam Altman picks it up and tweets that is that it is, on the one hand, sort of an attempt to reclaim what is understood as an insult or slur by people in that mindset, but also, and very importantly, it is about minimizing what it is to be human, so that he can claim that the system that he’s built is as good as a person.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emily and Alex say this concept of comparing humans to, essentially, flesh machines is a classic move in the AI hype machine playbook. It’s reducing humanity and what it means to be human to programming, like Eliza in the 60s. Eliza was an early natural language processing program designed to mimic a therapist. Think of it as a great, great, great, grand chatbot of ChatGPT. A lot of people, from academics to government leaders to tech industry giants, bought into the Eliza hype. And that freaked out Eliza’s own creator, Joseph Weizenbaum. In a book he published in the 70s, Weizenbaum warned that machines would never be able to make the same decisions that humans make because they don’t have human empathy. His criticism of AI caused a stir in the research community. And decades later, AI boosters are still making that same claim. That humans and machines aren’t that different. But what does this devaluing of humanity really mean for us? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, it means a lot of things. It really seems to emphasize that there is, kind of, aspects of human behavior that can just be reduced to our observable outputs, right? Humans are just things that output language or output actions, when that’s not true. Humans have a much more vivid internal life. Um, we think about others. Uh, we think about, kind of, co-presence, but it’s more about saying how we’re comparing ourselves to machines that are programmed by people and those people in those institutions have particular types of incentives to make machines that behave as such. So that’s the kind of implications that it has and it also has the implications of other kinds of moves into humanism, dehumanization and what that does and how we treat people and with regards to dignity and propriety of rights. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you also give concrete examples of where we see this kind of, uh, devaluing of humans? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think if we say that humans can be reduced to their outputs, that that leads to lots of problems. And one is we end up saying, you know, the form of, or the words that teachers and students say in the classroom is the learning situation. And so we can replace the teacher with a system for outputting words and then those students will get as much and maybe it’ll be personalized and it’ll better. And that is dehumanizing to teachers clearly and also to students because it removes, you know, everything that is about the student and teacher’s internal life and about their relationship and about their community from the situation. But I think it’s also really important in terms of the workforce more generally, that basically if we say, well, humans like large language models are systems for outputting words, then it’s a very small step to basically saying the whole value of this person is how many words they can output and doing a very, very dehumanizing work environment to people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We also see this in other domains like the Amazon work floor and the ways that these mini robots flit from place to place and the so-called quote unquote pickers. People on Amazon work warehouses have to pick things and then deliver them. So there’s a lot of implications for that and I think also in seeing the humanity in other folks and how we treat other folks. You know, if they’re merely meat machines, then what does it say about how we view them with respect to, kind of, personal rights and human rights and what kind of rights they should be afforded? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This idea of human beings just being walking meat machines is chilling. It definitely creeped me out. What are the other real world consequences of this thinking? Let’s open a new tab. Who’s really harmed by AI hype? Alex and Emily have said that their goal with writing the AI con is to reduce the harm caused by AI hype. Automation, for example, doesn’t just replace jobs. Healthcare providers are increasingly relying on AI products for medical triage to decide which patients to see first. Free legal representation, a guaranteed right in criminal cases, can be replaced by a lawyer using a chat bot. All of this potentially lowers the quality of these services. And introduces bias into these systems. Artists and other creatives, meanwhile, are struggling to make ends meet as AI generators, sometimes trained on their own work, are used as a cheaper, faster alternative. And then there’s how large language models are disrupting our whole information ecosystem. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s a metaphor we use in the book, the idea that information is being output from these models and results in information ecosystem spills, like toxic spills that really can’t be cleaned up. There’s not really a reliable way to detect synthetic text. And so you’re having to deal with and navigate and try to understand whether something on the internet is actually reflective of truth claims that are being made and perhaps researched more deeply by human individuals. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’ve written that the strongest critiques against AI boosterism come from black, brown, poor, queer, and disabled scholars and activists. Can you talk about some examples of these critiques and why these groups specifically are so uniquely positioned to make them? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So we wrote about that in the register of thinking about the ways in which systems, in here, I want to say data-driven systems, not just large language models, but even different systems just don’t work for black, brown communities, queer, and trans people, and then people like refugees and people on the move. The kind of pioneering work of Drs. Temnit Gebru and Joy Buolamwini in their paper Gender Shades talks about facial analysis systems, specifically the way that facial analysis systems do very poorly on darker-skinned women and that there’s a huge delta between darker-skinned women and lighter-skinned men. Sasha Costanza-Chock talks about how tools like TSA scanners do very poorly on trans people. Typically flagging genitals as anomalies or chest areas as anomalities, and then the kind of disparities of how systems talk about women. So there’s been a few papers talking about the ways in which different tools, in this case a word embedding space, makes associations between people and occupation. So, man is to doctor, women is to… typically, the completion is nurse, so it makes presuppositions of this. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of this stuff effectively happens in large-language models [laughter] and happens in image generation models as well. There’s some great research by the Bloomberg data team that shows that if you input something like a nurse, uh, typically or a housekeeper, it outputs a kind of a phenotypically looking darker-skinned woman. If you type in CEO, white man. And so those kinds of elements are the bias element of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ruha Benjamin sums it up really nicely in this beautiful essay called The New Artificial Intelligentsia that appeared in the LA Review of Books in 2024. And she’s talking about these ideas of transhumanism and merging with the machines. She says this zealous desire to transcend humanity ignores the fact that we have not all had the chance to be fully human. My interpretation of what she’s saying is that the people that society does not accord full humanity to have a very different experience of technology, both in the ways, as Alex is saying, it’s being used on them, in the ways that doesn’t work well for them and just in the way that it intrudes on their life. And so people who have the privilege of not experiencing any of that tend to be less sensitized to what’s going on and to have a less informed perspective. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And this less-informed perspective encourages AI boosters, who continue to fuel the hype machine. This means investing in and launching new products at a breakneck pace, often overlooking the real-world impact. The MIT Technology Review recently reported that generating one 5-second AI video uses about 3.4 million joules, the equivalent of running a microwave for over an hour. At scale this amount of energy consumption is devastating for the environment. And running all of this comes at a steep price for AI companies, too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like we talked about earlier, OpenAI’s Sora app is proving to be wildly expensive, with more users generating videos than actually watching them. And after the copyright fiasco and subsequent new guardrails, it seems like some initial adopters are already moving on. Can the hype machine sustain this kind of frenzied investment with such limited return? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, we’re opening one last tab. Is the height machine breaking? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Do you think the AI hype bubble is going to burst? I mean, like, are there economic critiques? You’ve heard the social ones, but is there anything pointing to the AI height bubble possibly at least deflating? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, well, the problem is that there’s so much capital expenditure going into building things like data centers, and they’re going into these massive data center build out where, you know, the kind of projections and how much OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta are spending on this all is astronomical. I mean, hundreds of billions of dollars, just some of the largest technological infrastructure projects that we’ve ever seen. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">At the same time, OpenAI again, the company that has the most queries to Chat GPT, people using most of its products, is making revenue on the order of maybe $10 billion a year. So it’s just orders of magnitude less. And the kind of metaphor that’s being used as well, we have to build the railroads first, and then once the rail roads get going, we can put rail cars in them. But that metaphor doesn’t work at all. People are already using the product. And, you know, companies are already saying, we’re not getting a lot of value out of this. You know, there was an, something that was coming out of MIT, which said 95% of companies just haven’t really gained value from quote unquote AI. So what’s happening? This is very bubble shaped, you now, and I don’t know how the story ends, but it’s very alarming that these four to seven companies are propping up the US and world economy right now, so what happens when the bubble deflates or bursts, it’s not going to be good. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like you said, um, you finished this book in September 2024. The AI industry has only grown since then. What have you learned about the state of the AI hype machine from the reception to your book? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I would say what I’ve learned the most about is about the resilience of people and the importance of connection and community. So the antidote to the hype is a variety of things, one is ridicule as praxis, as we say in the book, and also solidarity and labor movements, but also just sort of connection. And one form of that connection is that there’s a lot of people who are, who feel isolated in a workplace or a social circle where everyone around them seems just completely gaga for this technology and they’re the odd one out. And so one of the joys of both our podcasts and this book has been to find those people and be found by those people who say, oh, so glad I’m not the only one. And then they can form community with other people who have the same reaction and I think that that is super important. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the things we grapple a lot just like within Close All Tabs is where to draw the line with AI use, you know. And again, that’s complicated. What is AI? For example, we don’t use ChatGPT, but we use an AI transcription tool for our interviews. Are there conditions under which using large language models, AI tools, are reasonable or justified, appropriate? And then what’s your message to the average listener who maybe uses ChatGPT in their daily but they’re not necessarily AI boosters and not necessarily AI doomers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. Um, so to the first question, I would say I never call it an AI transcription tool. I would say automatic transcription, right? And that is a use case where, you know, you want to look at the labor conditions of the people who produced it, where the training data come from. And it’s also a use case where you are well positioned to check the output and see if it’s working well for you, right. You’ve got something that has been recorded, you’ve got an automatically produced transcript, you’re presumably going through and correcting it. And if it is wrong all the time, or if you have one that is particularly bad for non-Anglo names, for example, you might start looking for something that’s better. So that is a case of automation that I think can be okay. You still want to look into who produced it. Are there privacy implications? Can I use this tool without uploading my data to somebody else and so on? But there’s reasonable uses and reasonable ways to produce automatic transcription. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If we’re talking about chat bots of the form of ChatGPT, I don’t see reasonable use cases there. And partially we know that the labor and environmental costs are extraordinarily high, that this is not produced ethically. But even setting that aside, every time you turn to ChatGPT for information, you’re cutting yourself off from important sense-making. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the examples I like to use, if you think about an old fashioned search engine that gave you back, you know, the 10 blue links and you’ve got a medical query, what might come back in those links is a link to, you know something like the Mayo Clinic and then your regional university medical center, so in the Bay area, you know UCSF. And you might get a link to Dr. Oz’s page and you might get a link to a discussion forum where people with the same medical questions are talking to each other. And you can then look at those and understand the information that’s there based on what you know about the Mayo Clinic and UCSF and Dr. Oz and discussion forums. But that also helps you continue to update what you know, about those kinds of sites. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whereas if you asked a chatbot and you got back something that was just sort of some paper mache made up out of some combination of what’s in those sites, you not only don’t know how to contextualize what you’ve seen, but you’re also cut off from ability to continue to understand the information environment. And then very importantly, if you think about that discussion forum, any given, you know, sentence from that discussion forum interpreted as information, you’re going to want to take with a big grain of salt. But the chance to connect with people who are going through the same medical journey is priceless. And there’s a, the scholar Chris Gilliard describes these technologies as technologies of isolation. And I think it’s really important to think about anytime you might turn to a chat bot- what would you have done three years ago? What would you have done when ChatGPT was not in your world and what are you missing out on by not doing that now? The connections that you would make with people, the ongoing maintenance of relationships, the building of community, the deeper sense of what’s going on in the world around you, all of these are precious and I think not to be thrown away for the semblance of convenience. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then I think the final thing that I would say is look out for, identify, and reject the inevitability narrative. So the tech companies would like us to believe that AI is the future, it’s definitely coming. Even if you don’t like it, you have to resign yourself to it. And you’ll get people saying, well, it’s here to stay, we have to learn what to live with it. And I refuse that. I say that is also a bid to steal our agency because the future is not written. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Those are all my questions. Thank you so much for joining us.\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>\u003c/b>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, thank you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was a pleasure. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s close all of these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Chris Egusa and edited by Jen Chien. Close All tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our senior editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who’s KQED’s director of podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Brendan Willard is our audio engineer. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our editor in chief. Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California Local. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This episode’s keyboard sounds were submitted by my dad, Casey Sung, and recorded on his white and blue Epomaker Aula F99 keyboard with Greywood V3 switches and Cherry Profile PBT keycaps. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. Follow us on Instagram at CloseAllTabsPod, or TikTok at Close All Tabs. Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Researchers Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna critique the AI industry’s loftiest claims and point out real-world harms of AI.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1760644665,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 79,
"wordCount": 6701
},
"headData": {
"title": "Beyond the AI Hype Machine | KQED",
"description": "When ChatGPT launched in 2022, it kicked off what some have called the “AI hype machine” — a frenzy of promotion and investment that has sent some tech companies’ valuations soaring to record heights. Meanwhile, computational linguist Emily M. Bender and AI researcher and sociologist Alex Hanna have proudly worn the titles of “AI hype busters,” critiquing the industry’s loftiest claims and pointing out the real-world harms behind this wave of excitement. What began as a satirical podcast is now a book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want. In this episode, Alex and Emily explain why the very term “AI” is misleading, how AI boosters and doomers are really flip sides of the same coin, and why we should question the AI inevitability narrative.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "When ChatGPT launched in 2022, it kicked off what some have called the “AI hype machine” — a frenzy of promotion and investment that has sent some tech companies’ valuations soaring to record heights. Meanwhile, computational linguist Emily M. Bender and AI researcher and sociologist Alex Hanna have proudly worn the titles of “AI hype busters,” critiquing the industry’s loftiest claims and pointing out the real-world harms behind this wave of excitement. What began as a satirical podcast is now a book, The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want. In this episode, Alex and Emily explain why the very term “AI” is misleading, how AI boosters and doomers are really flip sides of the same coin, and why we should question the AI inevitability narrative.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Beyond the AI Hype Machine",
"datePublished": "2025-10-15T03:00:53-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-10-16T12:57:45-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC5696998106.mp3?updated=1760509908",
"sticky": false,
"nprStoryId": "kqed-12059911",
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12059911/beyond-the-ai-hype-machine",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"#episode-transcript\">\u003ci>View the full episode transcript.\u003c/i>\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When ChatGPT launched in 2022, it kicked off what some have called the “AI hype machine” — a frenzy of promotion and investment that has sent some tech companies’ valuations soaring to record heights. Meanwhile, computational linguist Emily M. Bender and AI researcher and sociologist Alex Hanna have proudly worn the titles of “AI hype busters,” critiquing the industry’s loftiest claims and pointing out the real-world harms behind this wave of excitement. What began as a satirical podcast is now a book, \u003c/span>\u003ca href=\"https://thecon.ai/\">\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The AI Con\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">:\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">. In this episode, Alex and Emily explain why the very term “AI” is misleading, how AI boosters and doomers are really flip sides of the same coin, and why we should question the AI inevitability narrative. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC5696998106\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/emilymbender.bsky.social\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emily Bender\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, professor of linguistics the University of Washington\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://bsky.app/profile/alexhanna.bsky.social\">Alex Hanna\u003c/a>, director of research at the Distributed AI Research Institute\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://thecon.ai/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The AI Con: How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Emily Bender and Alex Hanna\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.dair-institute.org/maiht3k/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Mystery AI Hype Theater 3000 Podcast\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.techpolicy.press/ai-hurts-consumers-and-workers-and-isnt-intelligent/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">“AI” Hurts Consumers and Workers — and Isn’t Intelligent\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Emily Bender and Alex Hanna, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Tech Policy Press\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://lithub.com/on-the-very-real-dangers-of-the-artificial-intelligence-hype-machine/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the Very Real Dangers of the Artificial Intelligence Hype Machine: Emily M. Bender and Alex Hanna Explore AI History, the Cold War, and a Fatally Overhyped Idea \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Emily M. Bender, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">LitHub\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.404media.co/sora-2-content-violation-guardrails-error/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People Are Crashing Out Over Sora 2’s New Guardrails\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Samantha Cole, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">404 Media\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sora-2-financial-problem\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sora 2 Has a Huge Financial Problem\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Victor Tangermann, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Futurism\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.technologyreview.com/2025/05/20/1116327/ai-energy-usage-climate-footprint-big-tech/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We did the math on AI’s energy footprint. Here’s the story you haven’t heard.\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — James O’Donnell and Casey Crownhart, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">MIT Technology Review\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A few weeks ago, OpenAI launched an app, Sora. It’s a vertical video social platform, similar to TikTok, except all the videos are generated by the company’s AI image generator, Sora 2. Within days, the app was a copyright infringement nightmare. There were videos of SpongeBob cooking meth, unsanctioned Rick and Morty ads for crypto startups, and many, many videos of open AI CEO Sam Altman doing depraved things to copyrighted characters. Like the one where he brutally barbecues and carves up Pikachu. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[AI CEO Sam Altman] Pikachu on the grill here. It’s already got a beautiful char and it smells like somebody plugged in a chicken. Let’s give it a flip. I’m gonna carve it into some thick steaks. Look at that. Crust on the outside, pink and juicy in the middle. Cheers.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of these 10 second videos require an immense amount of computing power, which is extremely costly to maintain. In a blog post, Sam Altman admitted that the company still needs to figure out how to make money off of Sora. He wrote, “People are generating much more than we expected per user, and a lot of videos are being generated for very small audiences.” Facing heat from copyright holders like Disney and Nintendo, Altman also announced extra guardrails for the app to curb infringement. Now, users are complaining that everything they try to generate using Sora 2 gets flagged as a violation of the copyrighted content policy. They’re already getting bored of the app. This whole cycle has been described as the AI hype machine. Big investments are made based on big promises of innovation, disruption, revolution. This hype fuels more investment, which, in turn, fuels the hype. The cycle continues when a new product launches. Meta, for example, launched its own AI social video app, called Vibes, last month too, which was quickly forgotten about when Sora launched. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">AI hype is effectively premised on fear of missing out. It is the fear that if you don’t get onto this new technology, you are going to be left behind. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s Alex Hanna, a sociologist and the Director of Research at the Distributed AI Research Institute. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you’re a corporate manager, you’re going to have your competitors just leave you in the dust. If you are a teacher, you are doing a disservice to your students by not preparing them for the job market of the future. If you were a student, you were going to miss out on all the skills and all your classmates are going to be outperforming you. And as a worker, you will be doing things the old way, the analog way, and everyone is going to be outpacing you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Alex and her co-author, Emily M. Bender, recently published a book, The AI Con, How to Fight Big Tech’s Hype and Create the Future We Want. Emily runs the computational linguistics program at the University of Washington. This is a field of study that combines human language with machine learning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I often get asked the question, well aren’t you worried that students are going to get left behind? Etc. And my answer to that is often, where is everybody going? Like, this metaphor of left behind suggests that people are running off into some brilliant future. I just don’t see it, you know, setting aside the fact that the technology doesn’t do what it’s being sold to do, but that is overhyped and over promised. The idea that we’d be better off with instead of interacting with people at all stages, interacting with screens that that’s just not the future that I want. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this episode, we’re talking about the AI hype machine, when it started, how it’s fed, and why a growing corner of critics say they see right through it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All right, like we always do, we’re starting by opening a new tab. What is P-Doom? In their book, The AI Con, Alex and Emily talk about these two groups. There are the AI boosters, the people who are optimistic that AI will pave the way to our utopian future. Then there are the AI doomers: the people that catastrophize, and believe that AI progress will usher in an era of societal collapse and human extinction. It’s very Matrix. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clip from the film “The Matrix] The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But before we break this down further, let’s start by defining our terms. Here’s Emily. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Artificial intelligence does not refer to a coherent set of technologies, and it has throughout its history, since it was coined by John McCarthy in 1955, basically been used to sell this idea of some magic do-everything technology in order to get money. Initially, it was research funding and then DOD money and now a lot of it is venture capital money. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, and the way that this has proliferated in the modern day is that so many things get called AI. So that could be automated decision-making systems used for determining whether someone gets social services. And so that gets looped in, and then we also get recommendation systems, things like the TikTok algorithm, the Instagram Reels algorithm, pick your short-form video. But then, it’s really manifest in these large language models and diffusion models that are looped into the category of generative AI.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You start this book from this one moment in 2023, when Chuck Schumer at the time, the Senate majority leader, held a series of forums around AI. Can you take us back to that moment and like set the scene for us? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, late 2023, Chuck Schumer is convening the eighth of total nine Senate Insight forums around AI, and he asks folks, this is very weird, he asks, “what is folks’ probability of doom?” And this is abbreviated as P(doom), and for this instance, it’s an audio platform, that is P, open parentheses, doom, closed parentheses. And he also asked, “what people’s pee hope is.” So this means what is your probability that there’s going to be some kind of a doom scenario, in which through, you know, hook or crook, some kind of thing called AI is going to outperform or outsmart humans and take over and lead to human extinction. And in the book, we start and we say, well, this is the wrong question. But also if you’re looking at harms that are happening in the here and now, there are many that exist, whether that be deep fake porn being made out of non-consensual adults and children, the use of automated decision-making and weapons targeting, especially in Gaza, and then we also talk about students having their exams effectively being judged by these automated tools. So talking about P(doom) in this register is asking the wrong question and focusing on the wrong things. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But oftentimes it looks like the doomers, the people with a high P(doom) value, the people who take that question seriously in the first place, um, and the boosters, the people who say this is gonna solve all our problems, are like the opposite ends of a spectrum. And that is how these people present themselves, it is how the media often presents what’s going on, and it is very misleading. I think that one of the points that we make is that doomerism is another kind of AI hype, because it’s saying, our system is very powerful. It’s so powerful, it’s going to kill us all, is a way of saying it’s very powerful, but also we make the point that the doomers and the boosters are two sides of the same coin. And it, I think, becomes very clear if you look at it this way, which is to say, the doomers say, “AI is a thing, it’s imminent, it’s inevitable, and it’s gonna kill us all.” And the boosters say, “AI’s a thing, it’s imminent, it’s inevitable, and it is gonna solve all of our problems.” And it’s pretty easy to see these are the same position with just a different twist at the end. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the funny thing about this boosterism, doomerism dichotomy is that these are many of the same people or they run in many of same circles. So, you know, there was this document that was put out called AI 2027, in which it ends with humanity dying and the kind of choose your own adventure. There’s only two endings here. The choose your own adventure and one of them, you know everyone dies. But the lead author of this works at OpenAI. And there’s many such cases of people who are working on quote unquote, “AI alignment”, who are in these industries. So, it’s again not as if they’re against the building of AI, or we should just say no, it’s actually a very narrow segment of people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You described this industry as the AI hype machine, the modern AI hype machine, what does it look like? I mean, who are the players? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, the players are many of the big tech players that we know. So Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Meta, but with some new entrants, OpenAI being the most significant one. Um, and along with OpenAI, a few offshoots, so Anthropic is kind of the most notable one. And then the company that’s creating the shovels for the gold rush, so that’s your Nvidia, and then your Taiwanese semiconductor manufacturing company, abbreviated as TSMC. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I want to say that we see AI hype not just originating from those big players, like that is a large source of it. Also we hear over and over and again about people working in various businesses being told by their higher ups that they have to try this new AI thing. And so there’s this sort of secondary promulgation of hype that comes from middle management and up that have been sold on the idea that this is going to, you know, really increase productivity. And, you know, on the one hand, it’s a very useful excuse for doing layoffs that they may have otherwise already wanted to do, but then on the other hand, some people seem to have really bought into the idea. So they tell the people working for them, you have to spend time figuring out how to make yourself more productive by using these so-called AI tools, because everyone’s telling me that that’s the way of the future. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, the obvious way people are, these players, are feeding into the AI hype machine is by extolling the virtues of AI, or, you know, kind of spreading this very doomerous sci-fi rhetoric. But what other strategies are being used to feed this machine? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So one important strategy is what I sometimes call citations to the future. So people will say, yeah, yeah. It’s got problems now, but it’s going to do all of these things. And I think it really is the only technology that we are expected to evaluate based on promises of what it will be doing, right? That car that I just bought only gets, you know, 35 miles to the gallon. But that’s OK, because the later one’s going to get 50. We don’t talk about it that way, except with the so-called AI technology.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>So, citations to the future is one big strategy and another one is anthropomorphizing language, talking about things that have happened as if the computer systems themselves did it of their own volition and autonomously instead of people having used the system to do it or done something in order to build the system. So it’ll be something like, AI needs lots and lots of data. Well, no, people who want to build the system that they’re calling AI are amassing lots and lots of data in order to build them, or AI is thirsty, it needs lots of water, or AI was able to identify, you know, something in a blurry image. It’s like — in no sense, right? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People used XYZ tool in order do a thing, or in order to build these tools, they are using lots of of water and so on. So this anthropomorphizing language sort of shifts the people out of the frame and hides a bunch of accountability, and at the same time, makes the systems sound cooler than they are. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Alex and Emily also pointed out that players in the AI industry push this adoption of AI into our everyday lives by really trying to humanize the product. We’re gonna dive into that in a new tab. First, a quick break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Time for a new tab! Are we really just meat machines?\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the technology itself, like the way people talk about large language models as AI, um, ChatGPT, Claude, Grok. Many people understand that these models are basically predicting the words that most often go together. But can you break it down further? Like, what’s really going on under the hood there? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, the first very important lesson is that when we say word, we’re actually talking about two things. We’re talking about the way the word is spelled and pronounced and what it is used to mean. And one thing that makes that hard to keep in mind is that as proficient speakers of the languages we speak, pretty much anytime we encounter the spelling or sound of a word, we are also encountering what the person using it is using it to talk about. And so we always experience the form and meaning together. But a language model, so that the core component of something like Gemini or Grok or Claude or ChatGPT is literally a system for modeling which bits of words go with which other bits of words in whatever the input collection of text was to create that model. And so what we have are models that are very good at putting literally like spellings of parts of words next to each other in a way that looks like something somebody might say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emily and Alex have come up with a few phrases that illustrate what large language models really are, which also describe the limitations of this tech. We’ve got synthetic text extruding machine. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The choice of the word extrude is very intentional because it’s a little gross. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Racist pile of linear algebra. Spicy autocomplete. And one phrase that really took off, stochastic parrot. Emily coined the phrase in a research paper she co-authored in 2020. Parrots can mimic human speech, but whether they can really comprehend it, that’s dubious. Stochastic comes from probability theory. It means randomly determined. So a stochastic parrot essentially mimics language in a random order and does so convincingly, but it doesn’t understand it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Starting with OpenAI’s GPT-2 and GPT3, they were using it to create synthetic text. And so one of the things we worried about in that paper is what happens if someone comes across synthetic text and doesn’t know that it was synthetic? What we didn’t realize at the time is that people would be happy to look at synthetic text while knowing that it’s synthetic. That is very surprising to me. And so the phrase stochastic parrots was this attempt to make vivid what’s going on, to help people understand why the output of a language model run to repeatedly answer the question, what’s a likely next word, is not the same thing as text produced by a person or group of people with something to communicate. And what’s happened, it’s been fascinating as a linguist to watch that phrase go out into the world, so for the first little while, it was people referring to the paper, and then it sort of became people talking about, um, that claim that large language models are not understanding, they’re just repeatedly predicting a likely next word. And then it got picked up or interpreted as an insult, which is surprising to me because in order for it to be an insult, the thing that it’s being applied to would have to the kind of thing that could be insulted. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Then in 2022, Sam Altman tweeted, I am a stochastic parrot and so are you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think what happens when Sam Altman picks it up and tweets that is that it is, on the one hand, sort of an attempt to reclaim what is understood as an insult or slur by people in that mindset, but also, and very importantly, it is about minimizing what it is to be human, so that he can claim that the system that he’s built is as good as a person.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Emily and Alex say this concept of comparing humans to, essentially, flesh machines is a classic move in the AI hype machine playbook. It’s reducing humanity and what it means to be human to programming, like Eliza in the 60s. Eliza was an early natural language processing program designed to mimic a therapist. Think of it as a great, great, great, grand chatbot of ChatGPT. A lot of people, from academics to government leaders to tech industry giants, bought into the Eliza hype. And that freaked out Eliza’s own creator, Joseph Weizenbaum. In a book he published in the 70s, Weizenbaum warned that machines would never be able to make the same decisions that humans make because they don’t have human empathy. His criticism of AI caused a stir in the research community. And decades later, AI boosters are still making that same claim. That humans and machines aren’t that different. But what does this devaluing of humanity really mean for us? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, it means a lot of things. It really seems to emphasize that there is, kind of, aspects of human behavior that can just be reduced to our observable outputs, right? Humans are just things that output language or output actions, when that’s not true. Humans have a much more vivid internal life. Um, we think about others. Uh, we think about, kind of, co-presence, but it’s more about saying how we’re comparing ourselves to machines that are programmed by people and those people in those institutions have particular types of incentives to make machines that behave as such. So that’s the kind of implications that it has and it also has the implications of other kinds of moves into humanism, dehumanization and what that does and how we treat people and with regards to dignity and propriety of rights. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you also give concrete examples of where we see this kind of, uh, devaluing of humans? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think if we say that humans can be reduced to their outputs, that that leads to lots of problems. And one is we end up saying, you know, the form of, or the words that teachers and students say in the classroom is the learning situation. And so we can replace the teacher with a system for outputting words and then those students will get as much and maybe it’ll be personalized and it’ll better. And that is dehumanizing to teachers clearly and also to students because it removes, you know, everything that is about the student and teacher’s internal life and about their relationship and about their community from the situation. But I think it’s also really important in terms of the workforce more generally, that basically if we say, well, humans like large language models are systems for outputting words, then it’s a very small step to basically saying the whole value of this person is how many words they can output and doing a very, very dehumanizing work environment to people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We also see this in other domains like the Amazon work floor and the ways that these mini robots flit from place to place and the so-called quote unquote pickers. People on Amazon work warehouses have to pick things and then deliver them. So there’s a lot of implications for that and I think also in seeing the humanity in other folks and how we treat other folks. You know, if they’re merely meat machines, then what does it say about how we view them with respect to, kind of, personal rights and human rights and what kind of rights they should be afforded? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This idea of human beings just being walking meat machines is chilling. It definitely creeped me out. What are the other real world consequences of this thinking? Let’s open a new tab. Who’s really harmed by AI hype? Alex and Emily have said that their goal with writing the AI con is to reduce the harm caused by AI hype. Automation, for example, doesn’t just replace jobs. Healthcare providers are increasingly relying on AI products for medical triage to decide which patients to see first. Free legal representation, a guaranteed right in criminal cases, can be replaced by a lawyer using a chat bot. All of this potentially lowers the quality of these services. And introduces bias into these systems. Artists and other creatives, meanwhile, are struggling to make ends meet as AI generators, sometimes trained on their own work, are used as a cheaper, faster alternative. And then there’s how large language models are disrupting our whole information ecosystem. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s a metaphor we use in the book, the idea that information is being output from these models and results in information ecosystem spills, like toxic spills that really can’t be cleaned up. There’s not really a reliable way to detect synthetic text. And so you’re having to deal with and navigate and try to understand whether something on the internet is actually reflective of truth claims that are being made and perhaps researched more deeply by human individuals. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’ve written that the strongest critiques against AI boosterism come from black, brown, poor, queer, and disabled scholars and activists. Can you talk about some examples of these critiques and why these groups specifically are so uniquely positioned to make them? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So we wrote about that in the register of thinking about the ways in which systems, in here, I want to say data-driven systems, not just large language models, but even different systems just don’t work for black, brown communities, queer, and trans people, and then people like refugees and people on the move. The kind of pioneering work of Drs. Temnit Gebru and Joy Buolamwini in their paper Gender Shades talks about facial analysis systems, specifically the way that facial analysis systems do very poorly on darker-skinned women and that there’s a huge delta between darker-skinned women and lighter-skinned men. Sasha Costanza-Chock talks about how tools like TSA scanners do very poorly on trans people. Typically flagging genitals as anomalies or chest areas as anomalities, and then the kind of disparities of how systems talk about women. So there’s been a few papers talking about the ways in which different tools, in this case a word embedding space, makes associations between people and occupation. So, man is to doctor, women is to… typically, the completion is nurse, so it makes presuppositions of this. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of this stuff effectively happens in large-language models [laughter] and happens in image generation models as well. There’s some great research by the Bloomberg data team that shows that if you input something like a nurse, uh, typically or a housekeeper, it outputs a kind of a phenotypically looking darker-skinned woman. If you type in CEO, white man. And so those kinds of elements are the bias element of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ruha Benjamin sums it up really nicely in this beautiful essay called The New Artificial Intelligentsia that appeared in the LA Review of Books in 2024. And she’s talking about these ideas of transhumanism and merging with the machines. She says this zealous desire to transcend humanity ignores the fact that we have not all had the chance to be fully human. My interpretation of what she’s saying is that the people that society does not accord full humanity to have a very different experience of technology, both in the ways, as Alex is saying, it’s being used on them, in the ways that doesn’t work well for them and just in the way that it intrudes on their life. And so people who have the privilege of not experiencing any of that tend to be less sensitized to what’s going on and to have a less informed perspective. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And this less-informed perspective encourages AI boosters, who continue to fuel the hype machine. This means investing in and launching new products at a breakneck pace, often overlooking the real-world impact. The MIT Technology Review recently reported that generating one 5-second AI video uses about 3.4 million joules, the equivalent of running a microwave for over an hour. At scale this amount of energy consumption is devastating for the environment. And running all of this comes at a steep price for AI companies, too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like we talked about earlier, OpenAI’s Sora app is proving to be wildly expensive, with more users generating videos than actually watching them. And after the copyright fiasco and subsequent new guardrails, it seems like some initial adopters are already moving on. Can the hype machine sustain this kind of frenzied investment with such limited return? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, we’re opening one last tab. Is the height machine breaking? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Do you think the AI hype bubble is going to burst? I mean, like, are there economic critiques? You’ve heard the social ones, but is there anything pointing to the AI height bubble possibly at least deflating? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, well, the problem is that there’s so much capital expenditure going into building things like data centers, and they’re going into these massive data center build out where, you know, the kind of projections and how much OpenAI, Microsoft, Google, Amazon, and Meta are spending on this all is astronomical. I mean, hundreds of billions of dollars, just some of the largest technological infrastructure projects that we’ve ever seen. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">At the same time, OpenAI again, the company that has the most queries to Chat GPT, people using most of its products, is making revenue on the order of maybe $10 billion a year. So it’s just orders of magnitude less. And the kind of metaphor that’s being used as well, we have to build the railroads first, and then once the rail roads get going, we can put rail cars in them. But that metaphor doesn’t work at all. People are already using the product. And, you know, companies are already saying, we’re not getting a lot of value out of this. You know, there was an, something that was coming out of MIT, which said 95% of companies just haven’t really gained value from quote unquote AI. So what’s happening? This is very bubble shaped, you now, and I don’t know how the story ends, but it’s very alarming that these four to seven companies are propping up the US and world economy right now, so what happens when the bubble deflates or bursts, it’s not going to be good. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like you said, um, you finished this book in September 2024. The AI industry has only grown since then. What have you learned about the state of the AI hype machine from the reception to your book? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I would say what I’ve learned the most about is about the resilience of people and the importance of connection and community. So the antidote to the hype is a variety of things, one is ridicule as praxis, as we say in the book, and also solidarity and labor movements, but also just sort of connection. And one form of that connection is that there’s a lot of people who are, who feel isolated in a workplace or a social circle where everyone around them seems just completely gaga for this technology and they’re the odd one out. And so one of the joys of both our podcasts and this book has been to find those people and be found by those people who say, oh, so glad I’m not the only one. And then they can form community with other people who have the same reaction and I think that that is super important. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the things we grapple a lot just like within Close All Tabs is where to draw the line with AI use, you know. And again, that’s complicated. What is AI? For example, we don’t use ChatGPT, but we use an AI transcription tool for our interviews. Are there conditions under which using large language models, AI tools, are reasonable or justified, appropriate? And then what’s your message to the average listener who maybe uses ChatGPT in their daily but they’re not necessarily AI boosters and not necessarily AI doomers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. Um, so to the first question, I would say I never call it an AI transcription tool. I would say automatic transcription, right? And that is a use case where, you know, you want to look at the labor conditions of the people who produced it, where the training data come from. And it’s also a use case where you are well positioned to check the output and see if it’s working well for you, right. You’ve got something that has been recorded, you’ve got an automatically produced transcript, you’re presumably going through and correcting it. And if it is wrong all the time, or if you have one that is particularly bad for non-Anglo names, for example, you might start looking for something that’s better. So that is a case of automation that I think can be okay. You still want to look into who produced it. Are there privacy implications? Can I use this tool without uploading my data to somebody else and so on? But there’s reasonable uses and reasonable ways to produce automatic transcription. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If we’re talking about chat bots of the form of ChatGPT, I don’t see reasonable use cases there. And partially we know that the labor and environmental costs are extraordinarily high, that this is not produced ethically. But even setting that aside, every time you turn to ChatGPT for information, you’re cutting yourself off from important sense-making. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the examples I like to use, if you think about an old fashioned search engine that gave you back, you know, the 10 blue links and you’ve got a medical query, what might come back in those links is a link to, you know something like the Mayo Clinic and then your regional university medical center, so in the Bay area, you know UCSF. And you might get a link to Dr. Oz’s page and you might get a link to a discussion forum where people with the same medical questions are talking to each other. And you can then look at those and understand the information that’s there based on what you know about the Mayo Clinic and UCSF and Dr. Oz and discussion forums. But that also helps you continue to update what you know, about those kinds of sites. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whereas if you asked a chatbot and you got back something that was just sort of some paper mache made up out of some combination of what’s in those sites, you not only don’t know how to contextualize what you’ve seen, but you’re also cut off from ability to continue to understand the information environment. And then very importantly, if you think about that discussion forum, any given, you know, sentence from that discussion forum interpreted as information, you’re going to want to take with a big grain of salt. But the chance to connect with people who are going through the same medical journey is priceless. And there’s a, the scholar Chris Gilliard describes these technologies as technologies of isolation. And I think it’s really important to think about anytime you might turn to a chat bot- what would you have done three years ago? What would you have done when ChatGPT was not in your world and what are you missing out on by not doing that now? The connections that you would make with people, the ongoing maintenance of relationships, the building of community, the deeper sense of what’s going on in the world around you, all of these are precious and I think not to be thrown away for the semblance of convenience. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then I think the final thing that I would say is look out for, identify, and reject the inevitability narrative. So the tech companies would like us to believe that AI is the future, it’s definitely coming. Even if you don’t like it, you have to resign yourself to it. And you’ll get people saying, well, it’s here to stay, we have to learn what to live with it. And I refuse that. I say that is also a bid to steal our agency because the future is not written. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Those are all my questions. Thank you so much for joining us.\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>\u003c/b>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Emily M. Bender: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, thank you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alex Hanna: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was a pleasure. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s close all of these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Chris Egusa and edited by Jen Chien. Close All tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our senior editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who’s KQED’s director of podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Brendan Willard is our audio engineer. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our editor in chief. Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California Local. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This episode’s keyboard sounds were submitted by my dad, Casey Sung, and recorded on his white and blue Epomaker Aula F99 keyboard with Greywood V3 switches and Cherry Profile PBT keycaps. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. Follow us on Instagram at CloseAllTabsPod, or TikTok at Close All Tabs. Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12059911/beyond-the-ai-hype-machine",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869",
"11832"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_25184",
"news_32664",
"news_34755",
"news_22973",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12059912",
"label": "source_news_12059911"
},
"news_12058992": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12058992",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12058992",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1759917643000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "the-all-seeing-eyes-of-modern-dating",
"title": "The All-Seeing Eyes of Modern Dating",
"publishDate": 1759917643,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "The All-Seeing Eyes of Modern Dating | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What happens to dating when every misstep has the potential to go viral? That’s what happened when social media posts warning about a few bad dates with a man named “West Elm Caleb” blew up on TikTok in 2022, and became a cautionary tale on the culture of public shaming. In this episode, Morgan speaks with tech journalist Tanya Chen and culture writer Magdalene Taylor about the rise of the “dating panopticon” — a world in which love, gossip, and surveillance collide. From ghosting to the hacked “Tea App,” they explore how online whisper networks meant to protect women have turned into digital minefields, and what it takes to opt out of turning our romantic lives into content.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC8574284943\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://x.com/magdajtaylor?lang=en\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magdalene Taylor\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, writer, culture critic, and senior editor at Playboy\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://x.com/tanyachen\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Tanya Tianyi Chen\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, independent tech writer and editor\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.sexual-culture.com/p/reject-the-digital-dating-panopticon\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Reject the Digital Dating Panopticon\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Magdalene J. Taylor, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many Such Cases\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.sexual-culture.com/p/gender-relations-have-made-dating\">Gender Relations Have Made Dating a Hostile Act\u003c/a> — Magdalene J. Taylor, \u003ci>Many Such Cases\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theverge.com/cyber-security/714750/tea-hack-breach\">Women’s ‘red flag’ app Tea is a privacy nightmare\u003c/a> — Tanya Tianyi Chen, \u003ci>The Verge \u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://slate.com/culture/2022/01/west-elm-caleb-tiktok-explained.html\">West Elm Caleb: The TikTok mob’s latest target might not deserve its wrath.\u003c/a> — Madison Malone Kircher, \u003ci>Slate\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let me tell you an ancient cautionary tale about a man known as West Elm Caleb. Okay, this story is not that ancient. It took place in 2022, but in internet time, that’s eons ago. Caleb was a 20-something-year-old guy who lived in New York City, purportedly worked at the super trendy furniture company, West Elm, and became the poster child of everything wrong with dating app culture. It started on TikTok, when a woman named Mimi posted a video venting about getting ghosted by a man named Caleb. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Mimi Shou: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I wasn’t going to make a video about this, but I feel like it’s my duty as your Asian older sister to warn my New York City girls about this Caleb from West Elm. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Multiple other women commented, West Elm Caleb? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Clip: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I saw somebody talking about West Elm Caleb. Tall man, works at the same place, same name. This is a little too coincidental. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Clip: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Have you ever been personally victimized by West Elm Caleb? I’ve got the perfect f***ing song for you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">As it turned out, Mimi was talking about a completely different man. But those other women realized that they had all briefly dated the same guy, a 20-something mustachioed West Elm designer named Caleb. And they started talking about their unpleasant experiences with so-called West Elm Caleb. So here’s what West Elm Caleb has been accused of. He was a serial ghoster. He allegedly sent an unsolicited nude. He dated several women at once, sometimes seeing them back-to-back on the same day. And he sent multiple women supposedly customized playlists of romantic songs, only for them to find out that he had actually recycled the same one. It’s one of the gravest offenses in dating. For a few weeks, this man was the internet’s public enemy number one. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I believe he lost his job due to this. You know, it was just a few women who dated him who really didn’t like it. And they just were sharing their stories and it grew so out of hand. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Tanya Chen, an internet and tech reporter and my very online friend. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that was deeply unfortunate for Caleb, for West Elm Caleb. I do often wonder how he’s doing and where he is and how that whole experience shaped him forever. And again, I think we caveat to say, Morgan and I, we’re friends and we’re women and we’ve dated men. This is not to say that men should not be called out and should not have their feet held to the fire for their conduct. But how we do it and how things get out of hand is absolutely, I don’t think it justifies the crime in this case. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This culture of public shaming as punishment for bad behavior on dating apps is becoming more and more common. Whisper networks, meant to warn other women about dangerous men, have been twisted to harass people for the smallest offenses, like ghosting or refusing to commit to a relationship. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When it comes to dating, there’s so many difficult intimacy gaps and things happening between people. I’m sure we all have done things that we regret. We all have behaved in a way that we did not want to when it come to dating. And so for those extremely vulnerable and embarrassing moments to be then shared on such a public stage. It’s an incredibly unnerving experience, and I think it’s leading to a new host of behavioral and psychological problems, especially with young people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And now, these whisper networks have been infiltrated and turned against the women trying to keep each other safe. Like what happened with the Tea App. Tea Dating Advice, better known as the Tea App, went super viral over the summer as an app that has been described as Yelp for Men. It’s a closed, women-only platform that allows users to post about the red flags in men they’ve dated. The app was already contentious. Some people thought it violated men’s privacy. Then the app was hacked, twice, and user information like their driver’s licenses and private messages were spread online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This practice of monitoring and tattling on each other and of turning these intimate experiences into content is really just surveillance. The landscape of modern romance has changed dramatically in recent years, which has had devastating effects on the way people connect with each other. So what do we do about it? Today, we’re diving into the dating panopticon. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ll come back to Tanya, West Elm Caleb, and the Tea App later. First, how did we get here anyway? Let’s open our first tab. What is the dating panopticon? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the 1700s, this philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, came up with a concept of a circular prison. Jail cells line the perimeter of the building, and they all face a single watchtower looming in the center. The design is called a panopticon and comes from the Greek word for all seeing. The idea is that prisoners would behave because they think they’re being watched at all times. Today, the word panopticon is typically used as a metaphor for surveillance. And social media introduces a whole new dimension to the system. So to dive into this, we’re gonna talk to Magdalene Taylor, a sex and culture writer and senior editor at Playboy. Earlier this year, she wrote about the state of surveillance in modern romance in her newsletter, Many Such Cases. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So to me, the dating panopticon, it’s very much digitally focused, but it’s this pervasive sense that you are constantly being watched in your romantic interactions and that other people are constantly watching you. And with that, there’s a sense of surveillance and even sort of punishment involved. And we see a lot of this play out on dating apps, in Facebook groups, on just regular social media, Twitter, but then also in recent months, it’s really been distilled in apps like the Tea App. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magdalene started thinking about the dating panopticon while watching another dating scandal unfold online. Back in the spring, then 22-year-old political influencer Harry Sisson was accused of leading on multiple women. They all thought they were dating him exclusively, via Snapchat, only to find out that he was allegedly sexting all of them at once. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">While it’s obviously bad behavior on his part to be flirting with multiple women at a time on Snapchat, especially if these women were sending intimate photos and believing that they were the only one doing this, at the same time, I personally don’t find it all that unexpected or really newsworthy that a young 20-something-year-old man would be somewhat sexually active and perhaps even a little bit promiscuous. But something that the dating panopticon does is it distills these moments into a viral moment for everybody else to dissect and engage with and really play into the drama of. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When did you notice this shift in this culture of like public shaming and surveillance?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> To me, it really felt like the social media element of it all really blew up post-COVID and the immediate aftermath of being liberated from lockdowns. I think that we sort of momentarily lost touch with what normal human behavior and human interaction looks like, just the general ability to have a conversation with each other. And so going back into the dating world for a lot of people, I think was a very jarring experience. And with that, I think over the period of lockdown, a lot us probably got a lot more online. We probably got lot more hooked to our phones and became far more accustomed to filtering our lives through that lens specifically. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magdalene also pointed to the MeToo movement, which took off in 2017 as survivors came forward with their experiences of sexual violence and harassment in Hollywood. It started with women sharing stories of abuse and mistreatment, offering support and solidarity to each other. When the pandemic shut everything down and TikTok blew up, a lot of human interaction was reduced to content. YouTubers and other influencers have been doing this for years. But with the pandemic? Everyone was online. And everyone could post and consume content. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that it did trickle down in a way where, in addition to sharing crimes that people have committed, it also kind of veered in a different direction for some people in sharing just bad date stories and more misbehavior type things like ghosting somebody or going on a couple of early dates with women at a time or something like that. And so I think that all of these factors kind of converge together in 2021 or so and made for an environment where sharing these stories, whether it be your personal testament or whether it just be gossip, is now a very popular thing to do. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, in a lot of these cases, it seems like these incidents of bad behavior, whether it’s ghosting or seeing multiple women at once before any relationship is exclusive, is often conflated with the actual abuse and violence that the Me Too movement was about. Why do these two very different relationship dynamics get conflated in this dating panopticon? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, so I think that at the core of the dating panopticon is the fact that we are constantly looking for new content to consume and new drama to unfold. And a lot of us are on our phones way too much. That’s again our primary source of entertainment and social interaction. I think it’s an entertainment value thing that we’re looking for something else to capture our attention. And periodically that means resorting to kind of high school level romantic drama. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How has different tech surveillance made this prominent other than just, you know, like public shaming? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The dating panopticon exists because the data history of all of our dating lives exists through apps and through social media. But then there’s also this culture of our smartphones have made it so that you can discreetly film somebody anytime, basically, and more than that, share that to Instagram, share that Twitter. But what the dating panopticon has done is that it has transformed all of us into the surveillers and our phones are really the tool through which we’re doing that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What are other ways you’ve seen this kind of surveillance culture manifest in modern dating? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I think unfortunately there’s a lot of fearfulness in dating right now, and I think it’s possible to argue that something like the sex recession or, you know, any of the various statistics that suggest that people are forming relationships less or dating less or otherwise just spending more time alone. I think that it’s possible to argue that all of that is connected to the dating panopticon. It’s my belief personally that the dating panopticon is causing a portion of the retreat from interpersonal life that we’re seeing among young people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not just content that’s fueling the dating panopticon. The whisper networks are now being twisted for surveillance. That’s what happened with the Tea App. And we’ll break down the story of that privacy nightmare in a new tab. But first, a quick break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So what’s up with the Tea App? Let’s open a new tab. The Tea App scandal. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Tea App launched in 2023, but really started gaining traction over the summer when a new wave of users were approved to join. On TikTok, women started posting about their experiences on the app, from realizing that their boyfriends were cheating to warning others about a creepy date they had. As those stories blew up, more people joined the app. Like one person who shared her story with us. To protect her identity, we’re just going to refer to this person as N. She’s a single woman in her 20s, and like a lot of young women, has had some iffy experiences with dating. So, out of curiosity, she went on the Tea App. As she scrolled through the feed, she saw a familiar face. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I click on it, and it is the person that I thought it was. And it turned out to be this guy that I had been talking to for a little bit.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another user had posted about him after he slid into her DMs. She asked other Tea App users if anyone had information about him. So N responded from her anonymous account. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So it’s not something where I can say like, oh, he like cheated or oh, it’s nothing like that, you know? But it was just a sign of, I don’t know, it’s just like, dang, like, dude, you could have just, like, we talked about it, like you could’ve just told me to my face, you know, and just been honest about it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They exchanged a few messages and another girl jumped in and said this guy had also tried to hit on her and was pretty bummed out but she moved on. She stopped seeing the guy and then a couple of weeks later she got a text from an unknown number. This was outside of the app, directly to her phone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They were just saying that I’m basically, I’m trying to like paint him out to be this really bad guy and that he’s like the only good guy left in the city. And that I’m trying to mess his reputation up and all this stuff and that I’m trying to like mess up his family and that he’s actually a nice person and all of this stuff. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the thread on the Tea App multiple other users had responded to her, accusing her of lying about this guy. She eventually realized that one of his friends had probably seen the comments, figured out it was her, and sent the post to him. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just deleted the app. I deleted everything. I was like, just leave me out of it. This experience has completely changed my perspective, not just on dating, just even in social media, just as a whole. I guess I’m like a Gen Z-er, so I’ve grown up with social media my whole life, but if I can go back and not post a response to that girl, I 100% would go back and erase that. I would not have posted on the app. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And as it turns out, the Tea App itself was riddled with security blind spots. Let’s go back to my friend Tanya. She’s a tech journalist who recently covered the Tea App for The Verge. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The M.O. was to create this network online on the app that would essentially help women share stories, cues, protect each other from dating otherwise toxic, red-flaggy men. And we’ve seen this iteration in more unofficial online campaigns, like with, “are we dating the same guy” Facebook groups that sprouted up and gained popularity. So this was like the most official kind of wrangled in-app way that this has been done. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Tea App was supposed to be a giant global version of these local “are we dating the same guy” Facebook groups, like a background check database. Only women were allowed to join the app. And at first, potential users had to submit a photo of a government ID, like their driver’s license. They’ve since phased that out though, and just require selfies. The app says that these images are deleted after the user is verified. However, someone found an unsecured database of about 72,000 user images, including some 13,000 selfies and pictures of IDs. An anonymous user posted this database to 4chan. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the idea, the intent from these 4chan users was to shame and show how unprotected it was, but mostly to shame women who are posting on there because they felt really threatened by the app’s function. And from that 4chan post, tons of other 4chan users were able to access and download sensitive information and data. And even post them online. It was, I imagine, pretty, pretty stressful for everyone involved. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A week later, the Tea App was hacked again. The breach exposed over a million private messages, which included discussions of abortions and the phone numbers users sent each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So that’s deeply concerning, I think for anyone who is not online. Imagine just someone being able to go through, rummage your stuff and print a picture of your image and staple it to a traffic light or something. It’s very violating. It is so hard to control. It’s so hard wrangle once you have that out there. I think that’s been the big lesson in all of this. Beyond, you know, the kind of social-cultural ramifications of doing this, there’s the deep concerning privacy issue that we’re still litigating out in society, in government. There are no laws, policies that protect anyone, users from protecting their own identities and their own likenesses. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In response to the Tea App’s popularity, developers launched TeaOnHer, the men’s version of the Tea App to gossip about women. It turns out that TeaOnHer was also a privacy nightmare and also leaked users’ private information and government IDs. It wasn’t the only so-called Tea App for men.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Most of them got pulled down immediately because men resorted to revenge porn and you know incredibly illegal and exploitative and damaging ways that weren’t just to protect their fellow brethren. It was to again shame women, right. In this kind of discourse we do kind of see, you know, the disparities in how men and women date and how they perceive threats and how they respond to criticism, it is deeply fascinating and not at all surprising. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A lot of whisper networks meant to keep other people safe, other marginalized people safe, they’re within closed circles, whether it’s a close friend story or text or like a group chat between friends. How does bringing that online suddenly make it a tool of surveillance? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I love discussing surveillance culture in the panopticon. I think of all of us who are like extremely weary of the eyes online, the eyes on us. It’s just such a source of anxiety for so many of us when, yeah, how someone perceives you or represents you or their own narrative about you can make you feel seen in kind of a bad way or make you feels seen in a way that doesn’t give you, you know, good feelings or closure or healing. Surveillance culture is typically a destructive and perilous and anxiety-inducing experience. Someone has put you on the stage and you are being seen at 360 around you without your consent. And oftentimes you are muted. You don’t have the platform that you think you do and people are just kind of watching you and sometimes waiting for you to mess up so that they can report you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So what can you do about this constant surveillance? Can you trust modern love when the internet is always watching? We’re going back to Magdalene and opening one last tab, rejecting the dating panopticon. How is this kind of culture of surveillance, this dating panopticon, how is that impacting the way people date and connect to each other and seek out new connections? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I think that the dating panopticon has jaded a lot of people who are still willing to engage in dating life at all. I think that it has made people fearful and suspicious of each other. I think that made a lot people afraid of each other and suspicious of their intentions and what harms could befall them for pursuing dating. And so I think that there’s all these little points of evidence to suggest that people are trying to get away from this sort of watchful eye of digital life in dating, but we’re not fully there yet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Your essay was titled, Rejecting the Dating Panopticon. What does it mean to you to reject this kind of culture of surveillance? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that it means choosing to not engage with this culture of surveillance, whether that be you yourself decide to not post an awkward message that you received on Tinder or you choose to not comment on the latest TikTok thread of somebody in a state that you’re not in, the people you don’t even know having some kind of dating scandal among them. I hate to really go back to very simple platitudes of, you know, treat others how you want to be treated. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think that a lot of us need to think about how we’re engaging with social media and deciding that we shouldn’t be using other people’s vulnerability and romantic pursuits as content. And, you know, it can be difficult to parse these things out because like we’ve been saying this whole time, cheating on women is bad, ghosting is bad. All of these things are examples of bad behavior. But it’s so easy for these things to go back to a much more basic level of we are going to publicly shame a guy for sliding into somebody’s DMs at all. These things can so quickly turn into us embarrassing each other for social media points. We have to be a bit more selective and we have to intentionally decide that that’s not how we want to live our lives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that intentions are important thing to keep in mind here and that the dating panopticon encourages women not just to warn each other about bad behavior, but to make content because your brain likes notifications now because we’ve been hardwired to receive dopamine when our phone lights up. We can all do a little bit of a better job of understanding what our desire is in posting something. And are we posting about somebody because we actually want to warn other women, or are we posting about the shitty dates we went on because TikTok has incentivized us to do that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Remember N? She’s the woman who tried to give other users a heads up about the guy she was seeing, only to be harassed for it. N said that the experience has made her more cautious, not just about dating, but also about trusting what she thought was a safe space online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When I first started using the app, yeah because it was anonymous, I did feel safe and just knowing I can share whatever information I wanted without people knowing that it was me. But after the situation that happened, the world is just a lot smaller than you think and people are a lot more connected than you’d think. I just realized that anything you put out there, is there’s always going to be a chance of it potentially coming back, whether it be good, bad, or whatever. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, maybe keep the whisper networks offline, or at least confined to a very, very trusted group chat. Let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Maya Cueva and edited by Chris Hambrick. Close All Tabs’ Producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Audio engineering by Brendan Willard and Brian Douglas. Original music, including our theme song and credits by Chris Egusa. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Additional music by APM. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad, Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor-in-Chief. Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California Local. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dust Silver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to donate.kqed.org/podcasts. Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Morgan explores what it takes to opt out of a world in which love, gossip, and surveillance collide.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1759907332,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 71,
"wordCount": 4719
},
"headData": {
"title": "The All-Seeing Eyes of Modern Dating | KQED",
"description": "What happens to dating when every misstep has the potential to go viral? That’s what happened when social media posts warning about a few bad dates with a man named “West Elm Caleb” blew up on TikTok in 2022, and became a cautionary tale on the culture of public shaming. In this episode, Morgan speaks with tech journalist Tanya Chen and culture writer Magdalene Taylor about the rise of the “dating panopticon” — a world where love, gossip, and surveillance collide. From ghosting to the hacked “Tea App,” they explore how online whisper networks meant to protect women have turned into digital minefields, and what it takes to opt out of turning our romantic lives into content.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "What happens to dating when every misstep has the potential to go viral? That’s what happened when social media posts warning about a few bad dates with a man named “West Elm Caleb” blew up on TikTok in 2022, and became a cautionary tale on the culture of public shaming. In this episode, Morgan speaks with tech journalist Tanya Chen and culture writer Magdalene Taylor about the rise of the “dating panopticon” — a world where love, gossip, and surveillance collide. From ghosting to the hacked “Tea App,” they explore how online whisper networks meant to protect women have turned into digital minefields, and what it takes to opt out of turning our romantic lives into content.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "The All-Seeing Eyes of Modern Dating",
"datePublished": "2025-10-08T03:00:43-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-10-08T00:08:52-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC8574284943.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12058992/the-all-seeing-eyes-of-modern-dating",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What happens to dating when every misstep has the potential to go viral? That’s what happened when social media posts warning about a few bad dates with a man named “West Elm Caleb” blew up on TikTok in 2022, and became a cautionary tale on the culture of public shaming. In this episode, Morgan speaks with tech journalist Tanya Chen and culture writer Magdalene Taylor about the rise of the “dating panopticon” — a world in which love, gossip, and surveillance collide. From ghosting to the hacked “Tea App,” they explore how online whisper networks meant to protect women have turned into digital minefields, and what it takes to opt out of turning our romantic lives into content.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC8574284943\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://x.com/magdajtaylor?lang=en\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magdalene Taylor\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, writer, culture critic, and senior editor at Playboy\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://x.com/tanyachen\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Tanya Tianyi Chen\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, independent tech writer and editor\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.sexual-culture.com/p/reject-the-digital-dating-panopticon\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Reject the Digital Dating Panopticon\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Magdalene J. Taylor, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many Such Cases\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.sexual-culture.com/p/gender-relations-have-made-dating\">Gender Relations Have Made Dating a Hostile Act\u003c/a> — Magdalene J. Taylor, \u003ci>Many Such Cases\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theverge.com/cyber-security/714750/tea-hack-breach\">Women’s ‘red flag’ app Tea is a privacy nightmare\u003c/a> — Tanya Tianyi Chen, \u003ci>The Verge \u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://slate.com/culture/2022/01/west-elm-caleb-tiktok-explained.html\">West Elm Caleb: The TikTok mob’s latest target might not deserve its wrath.\u003c/a> — Madison Malone Kircher, \u003ci>Slate\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let me tell you an ancient cautionary tale about a man known as West Elm Caleb. Okay, this story is not that ancient. It took place in 2022, but in internet time, that’s eons ago. Caleb was a 20-something-year-old guy who lived in New York City, purportedly worked at the super trendy furniture company, West Elm, and became the poster child of everything wrong with dating app culture. It started on TikTok, when a woman named Mimi posted a video venting about getting ghosted by a man named Caleb. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Mimi Shou: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I wasn’t going to make a video about this, but I feel like it’s my duty as your Asian older sister to warn my New York City girls about this Caleb from West Elm. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Multiple other women commented, West Elm Caleb? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Clip: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I saw somebody talking about West Elm Caleb. Tall man, works at the same place, same name. This is a little too coincidental. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Clip: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Have you ever been personally victimized by West Elm Caleb? I’ve got the perfect f***ing song for you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">As it turned out, Mimi was talking about a completely different man. But those other women realized that they had all briefly dated the same guy, a 20-something mustachioed West Elm designer named Caleb. And they started talking about their unpleasant experiences with so-called West Elm Caleb. So here’s what West Elm Caleb has been accused of. He was a serial ghoster. He allegedly sent an unsolicited nude. He dated several women at once, sometimes seeing them back-to-back on the same day. And he sent multiple women supposedly customized playlists of romantic songs, only for them to find out that he had actually recycled the same one. It’s one of the gravest offenses in dating. For a few weeks, this man was the internet’s public enemy number one. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I believe he lost his job due to this. You know, it was just a few women who dated him who really didn’t like it. And they just were sharing their stories and it grew so out of hand. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Tanya Chen, an internet and tech reporter and my very online friend. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that was deeply unfortunate for Caleb, for West Elm Caleb. I do often wonder how he’s doing and where he is and how that whole experience shaped him forever. And again, I think we caveat to say, Morgan and I, we’re friends and we’re women and we’ve dated men. This is not to say that men should not be called out and should not have their feet held to the fire for their conduct. But how we do it and how things get out of hand is absolutely, I don’t think it justifies the crime in this case. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This culture of public shaming as punishment for bad behavior on dating apps is becoming more and more common. Whisper networks, meant to warn other women about dangerous men, have been twisted to harass people for the smallest offenses, like ghosting or refusing to commit to a relationship. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When it comes to dating, there’s so many difficult intimacy gaps and things happening between people. I’m sure we all have done things that we regret. We all have behaved in a way that we did not want to when it come to dating. And so for those extremely vulnerable and embarrassing moments to be then shared on such a public stage. It’s an incredibly unnerving experience, and I think it’s leading to a new host of behavioral and psychological problems, especially with young people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And now, these whisper networks have been infiltrated and turned against the women trying to keep each other safe. Like what happened with the Tea App. Tea Dating Advice, better known as the Tea App, went super viral over the summer as an app that has been described as Yelp for Men. It’s a closed, women-only platform that allows users to post about the red flags in men they’ve dated. The app was already contentious. Some people thought it violated men’s privacy. Then the app was hacked, twice, and user information like their driver’s licenses and private messages were spread online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This practice of monitoring and tattling on each other and of turning these intimate experiences into content is really just surveillance. The landscape of modern romance has changed dramatically in recent years, which has had devastating effects on the way people connect with each other. So what do we do about it? Today, we’re diving into the dating panopticon. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ll come back to Tanya, West Elm Caleb, and the Tea App later. First, how did we get here anyway? Let’s open our first tab. What is the dating panopticon? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the 1700s, this philosopher, Jeremy Bentham, came up with a concept of a circular prison. Jail cells line the perimeter of the building, and they all face a single watchtower looming in the center. The design is called a panopticon and comes from the Greek word for all seeing. The idea is that prisoners would behave because they think they’re being watched at all times. Today, the word panopticon is typically used as a metaphor for surveillance. And social media introduces a whole new dimension to the system. So to dive into this, we’re gonna talk to Magdalene Taylor, a sex and culture writer and senior editor at Playboy. Earlier this year, she wrote about the state of surveillance in modern romance in her newsletter, Many Such Cases. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So to me, the dating panopticon, it’s very much digitally focused, but it’s this pervasive sense that you are constantly being watched in your romantic interactions and that other people are constantly watching you. And with that, there’s a sense of surveillance and even sort of punishment involved. And we see a lot of this play out on dating apps, in Facebook groups, on just regular social media, Twitter, but then also in recent months, it’s really been distilled in apps like the Tea App. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magdalene started thinking about the dating panopticon while watching another dating scandal unfold online. Back in the spring, then 22-year-old political influencer Harry Sisson was accused of leading on multiple women. They all thought they were dating him exclusively, via Snapchat, only to find out that he was allegedly sexting all of them at once. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">While it’s obviously bad behavior on his part to be flirting with multiple women at a time on Snapchat, especially if these women were sending intimate photos and believing that they were the only one doing this, at the same time, I personally don’t find it all that unexpected or really newsworthy that a young 20-something-year-old man would be somewhat sexually active and perhaps even a little bit promiscuous. But something that the dating panopticon does is it distills these moments into a viral moment for everybody else to dissect and engage with and really play into the drama of. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When did you notice this shift in this culture of like public shaming and surveillance?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> To me, it really felt like the social media element of it all really blew up post-COVID and the immediate aftermath of being liberated from lockdowns. I think that we sort of momentarily lost touch with what normal human behavior and human interaction looks like, just the general ability to have a conversation with each other. And so going back into the dating world for a lot of people, I think was a very jarring experience. And with that, I think over the period of lockdown, a lot us probably got a lot more online. We probably got lot more hooked to our phones and became far more accustomed to filtering our lives through that lens specifically. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Magdalene also pointed to the MeToo movement, which took off in 2017 as survivors came forward with their experiences of sexual violence and harassment in Hollywood. It started with women sharing stories of abuse and mistreatment, offering support and solidarity to each other. When the pandemic shut everything down and TikTok blew up, a lot of human interaction was reduced to content. YouTubers and other influencers have been doing this for years. But with the pandemic? Everyone was online. And everyone could post and consume content. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that it did trickle down in a way where, in addition to sharing crimes that people have committed, it also kind of veered in a different direction for some people in sharing just bad date stories and more misbehavior type things like ghosting somebody or going on a couple of early dates with women at a time or something like that. And so I think that all of these factors kind of converge together in 2021 or so and made for an environment where sharing these stories, whether it be your personal testament or whether it just be gossip, is now a very popular thing to do. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, in a lot of these cases, it seems like these incidents of bad behavior, whether it’s ghosting or seeing multiple women at once before any relationship is exclusive, is often conflated with the actual abuse and violence that the Me Too movement was about. Why do these two very different relationship dynamics get conflated in this dating panopticon? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, so I think that at the core of the dating panopticon is the fact that we are constantly looking for new content to consume and new drama to unfold. And a lot of us are on our phones way too much. That’s again our primary source of entertainment and social interaction. I think it’s an entertainment value thing that we’re looking for something else to capture our attention. And periodically that means resorting to kind of high school level romantic drama. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How has different tech surveillance made this prominent other than just, you know, like public shaming? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The dating panopticon exists because the data history of all of our dating lives exists through apps and through social media. But then there’s also this culture of our smartphones have made it so that you can discreetly film somebody anytime, basically, and more than that, share that to Instagram, share that Twitter. But what the dating panopticon has done is that it has transformed all of us into the surveillers and our phones are really the tool through which we’re doing that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What are other ways you’ve seen this kind of surveillance culture manifest in modern dating? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I think unfortunately there’s a lot of fearfulness in dating right now, and I think it’s possible to argue that something like the sex recession or, you know, any of the various statistics that suggest that people are forming relationships less or dating less or otherwise just spending more time alone. I think that it’s possible to argue that all of that is connected to the dating panopticon. It’s my belief personally that the dating panopticon is causing a portion of the retreat from interpersonal life that we’re seeing among young people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not just content that’s fueling the dating panopticon. The whisper networks are now being twisted for surveillance. That’s what happened with the Tea App. And we’ll break down the story of that privacy nightmare in a new tab. But first, a quick break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So what’s up with the Tea App? Let’s open a new tab. The Tea App scandal. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Tea App launched in 2023, but really started gaining traction over the summer when a new wave of users were approved to join. On TikTok, women started posting about their experiences on the app, from realizing that their boyfriends were cheating to warning others about a creepy date they had. As those stories blew up, more people joined the app. Like one person who shared her story with us. To protect her identity, we’re just going to refer to this person as N. She’s a single woman in her 20s, and like a lot of young women, has had some iffy experiences with dating. So, out of curiosity, she went on the Tea App. As she scrolled through the feed, she saw a familiar face. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I click on it, and it is the person that I thought it was. And it turned out to be this guy that I had been talking to for a little bit.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another user had posted about him after he slid into her DMs. She asked other Tea App users if anyone had information about him. So N responded from her anonymous account. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So it’s not something where I can say like, oh, he like cheated or oh, it’s nothing like that, you know? But it was just a sign of, I don’t know, it’s just like, dang, like, dude, you could have just, like, we talked about it, like you could’ve just told me to my face, you know, and just been honest about it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They exchanged a few messages and another girl jumped in and said this guy had also tried to hit on her and was pretty bummed out but she moved on. She stopped seeing the guy and then a couple of weeks later she got a text from an unknown number. This was outside of the app, directly to her phone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They were just saying that I’m basically, I’m trying to like paint him out to be this really bad guy and that he’s like the only good guy left in the city. And that I’m trying to mess his reputation up and all this stuff and that I’m trying to like mess up his family and that he’s actually a nice person and all of this stuff. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the thread on the Tea App multiple other users had responded to her, accusing her of lying about this guy. She eventually realized that one of his friends had probably seen the comments, figured out it was her, and sent the post to him. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just deleted the app. I deleted everything. I was like, just leave me out of it. This experience has completely changed my perspective, not just on dating, just even in social media, just as a whole. I guess I’m like a Gen Z-er, so I’ve grown up with social media my whole life, but if I can go back and not post a response to that girl, I 100% would go back and erase that. I would not have posted on the app. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And as it turns out, the Tea App itself was riddled with security blind spots. Let’s go back to my friend Tanya. She’s a tech journalist who recently covered the Tea App for The Verge. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The M.O. was to create this network online on the app that would essentially help women share stories, cues, protect each other from dating otherwise toxic, red-flaggy men. And we’ve seen this iteration in more unofficial online campaigns, like with, “are we dating the same guy” Facebook groups that sprouted up and gained popularity. So this was like the most official kind of wrangled in-app way that this has been done. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Tea App was supposed to be a giant global version of these local “are we dating the same guy” Facebook groups, like a background check database. Only women were allowed to join the app. And at first, potential users had to submit a photo of a government ID, like their driver’s license. They’ve since phased that out though, and just require selfies. The app says that these images are deleted after the user is verified. However, someone found an unsecured database of about 72,000 user images, including some 13,000 selfies and pictures of IDs. An anonymous user posted this database to 4chan. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the idea, the intent from these 4chan users was to shame and show how unprotected it was, but mostly to shame women who are posting on there because they felt really threatened by the app’s function. And from that 4chan post, tons of other 4chan users were able to access and download sensitive information and data. And even post them online. It was, I imagine, pretty, pretty stressful for everyone involved. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A week later, the Tea App was hacked again. The breach exposed over a million private messages, which included discussions of abortions and the phone numbers users sent each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So that’s deeply concerning, I think for anyone who is not online. Imagine just someone being able to go through, rummage your stuff and print a picture of your image and staple it to a traffic light or something. It’s very violating. It is so hard to control. It’s so hard wrangle once you have that out there. I think that’s been the big lesson in all of this. Beyond, you know, the kind of social-cultural ramifications of doing this, there’s the deep concerning privacy issue that we’re still litigating out in society, in government. There are no laws, policies that protect anyone, users from protecting their own identities and their own likenesses. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In response to the Tea App’s popularity, developers launched TeaOnHer, the men’s version of the Tea App to gossip about women. It turns out that TeaOnHer was also a privacy nightmare and also leaked users’ private information and government IDs. It wasn’t the only so-called Tea App for men.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Most of them got pulled down immediately because men resorted to revenge porn and you know incredibly illegal and exploitative and damaging ways that weren’t just to protect their fellow brethren. It was to again shame women, right. In this kind of discourse we do kind of see, you know, the disparities in how men and women date and how they perceive threats and how they respond to criticism, it is deeply fascinating and not at all surprising. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A lot of whisper networks meant to keep other people safe, other marginalized people safe, they’re within closed circles, whether it’s a close friend story or text or like a group chat between friends. How does bringing that online suddenly make it a tool of surveillance? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tanya Chen: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I love discussing surveillance culture in the panopticon. I think of all of us who are like extremely weary of the eyes online, the eyes on us. It’s just such a source of anxiety for so many of us when, yeah, how someone perceives you or represents you or their own narrative about you can make you feel seen in kind of a bad way or make you feels seen in a way that doesn’t give you, you know, good feelings or closure or healing. Surveillance culture is typically a destructive and perilous and anxiety-inducing experience. Someone has put you on the stage and you are being seen at 360 around you without your consent. And oftentimes you are muted. You don’t have the platform that you think you do and people are just kind of watching you and sometimes waiting for you to mess up so that they can report you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So what can you do about this constant surveillance? Can you trust modern love when the internet is always watching? We’re going back to Magdalene and opening one last tab, rejecting the dating panopticon. How is this kind of culture of surveillance, this dating panopticon, how is that impacting the way people date and connect to each other and seek out new connections? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I think that the dating panopticon has jaded a lot of people who are still willing to engage in dating life at all. I think that it has made people fearful and suspicious of each other. I think that made a lot people afraid of each other and suspicious of their intentions and what harms could befall them for pursuing dating. And so I think that there’s all these little points of evidence to suggest that people are trying to get away from this sort of watchful eye of digital life in dating, but we’re not fully there yet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Your essay was titled, Rejecting the Dating Panopticon. What does it mean to you to reject this kind of culture of surveillance? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Magdalene Taylor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that it means choosing to not engage with this culture of surveillance, whether that be you yourself decide to not post an awkward message that you received on Tinder or you choose to not comment on the latest TikTok thread of somebody in a state that you’re not in, the people you don’t even know having some kind of dating scandal among them. I hate to really go back to very simple platitudes of, you know, treat others how you want to be treated. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think that a lot of us need to think about how we’re engaging with social media and deciding that we shouldn’t be using other people’s vulnerability and romantic pursuits as content. And, you know, it can be difficult to parse these things out because like we’ve been saying this whole time, cheating on women is bad, ghosting is bad. All of these things are examples of bad behavior. But it’s so easy for these things to go back to a much more basic level of we are going to publicly shame a guy for sliding into somebody’s DMs at all. These things can so quickly turn into us embarrassing each other for social media points. We have to be a bit more selective and we have to intentionally decide that that’s not how we want to live our lives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that intentions are important thing to keep in mind here and that the dating panopticon encourages women not just to warn each other about bad behavior, but to make content because your brain likes notifications now because we’ve been hardwired to receive dopamine when our phone lights up. We can all do a little bit of a better job of understanding what our desire is in posting something. And are we posting about somebody because we actually want to warn other women, or are we posting about the shitty dates we went on because TikTok has incentivized us to do that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Remember N? She’s the woman who tried to give other users a heads up about the guy she was seeing, only to be harassed for it. N said that the experience has made her more cautious, not just about dating, but also about trusting what she thought was a safe space online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>N: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When I first started using the app, yeah because it was anonymous, I did feel safe and just knowing I can share whatever information I wanted without people knowing that it was me. But after the situation that happened, the world is just a lot smaller than you think and people are a lot more connected than you’d think. I just realized that anything you put out there, is there’s always going to be a chance of it potentially coming back, whether it be good, bad, or whatever. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, maybe keep the whisper networks offline, or at least confined to a very, very trusted group chat. Let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Maya Cueva and edited by Chris Hambrick. Close All Tabs’ Producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Audio engineering by Brendan Willard and Brian Douglas. Original music, including our theme song and credits by Chris Egusa. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Additional music by APM. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad, Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor-in-Chief. Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California Local. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dust Silver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to donate.kqed.org/podcasts. Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12058992/the-all-seeing-eyes-of-modern-dating",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11832",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_35092",
"news_22973",
"news_28161",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_1089",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12059024",
"label": "source_news_12058992"
},
"news_12058181": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12058181",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12058181",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1759312846000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "in-search-of-thock-the-quest-for-the-perfect-keyboard",
"title": "In Search of Thock: The Quest for the Perfect Keyboard",
"publishDate": 1759312846,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "In Search of Thock: The Quest for the Perfect Keyboard | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">“Clacky,” “Poppy,” and “Thocky” may sound like the latest cereal elves, but they’re actually terms to describe the sounds of typing on a mechanical keyboard. What started as a niche hobby blew up during the pandemic, with a huge influx of creators posting tutorials, reviews, and soothing ASMR videos on social media. Many hobbyists are so enthusiastic about achieving the perfect sound, feel and response from their personal keyboards that they design and build their own, sometimes spending hundreds of dollars on custom parts.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lately though, the industry has been hitting some serious roadblocks. In this episode Morgan examines how the mechanical keyboard craze took off, and why it may now be starting to fade. We’ll hear from creators about how tariffs and the end of the \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">de minimis\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> rule are affecting everyone — from consumers to indie designers, to content creators. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC7054753045\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/enomooshikey/?hl=en\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Frank Lee\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, keyboard streamer and organizer of KeebLife\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/c/hipyotech\">Hipyo Tech\u003c/a>, YouTube creator\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/@SwitchandClickOfficial\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Betty Van\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, YouTube creator\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/29/21112581/taeha-types-mechanical-keyboards-custom-twitch-tfue-fortnite-streaming\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Twitch streamer behind Tfue’s custom $3,500 mechanical keyboard \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Nick Statt, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Verge\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/04/looming-tariffs-are-making-it-extra-hard-to-be-a-tech-geek/\">Looming tariffs are making it extra hard to be a tech geek \u003c/a>— Scharon Harding, \u003ci>Ars Technica\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>\u003ci>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/i>\u003c/b>\u003cb>\u003ci>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/i>\u003c/b>\u003cb>Kaylee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Each of these are all linear switches, but this one has the deepest sound, my cat keyboard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Kaylee, a mechanical keyboard builder and content creator who also goes by Sad Girl Types. She’s showing me one of her favorite builds, a cat-themed keyboard complete with a fuzzy calico cover. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kaylee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It has fur on it, so you can pet it. It is the color of a calico cat, and all of the keycaps are also calico colored. Yeah, that’s it. It’s a cat keyboard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I recently spent my Saturday afternoon wandering around a crowded convention hall ballroom, tapping and typing on so many keyboards that I lost count. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Typing sounds\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">]\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This was Keeb Life, an annual meetup for custom mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. On the edges of the ballroom, vendors sold unique keycaps and switches and other keyboard accessories. In the center of the room were rows and rows of folding tables, where attendees showed off their own custom builds. Each keyboard was accompanied by a card labeled with the builder’s Discord username and the details of their keyboard, literally down to each individual part. The cards also noted whether attendees were allowed to touch and pick up the keyboard. Each board was unique, and I tried almost all of them. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In case you haven’t noticed, Close All Tabs has a running bit about mechanical keyboards. At the end of each episode, we credit the keyboards that we use whenever we open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Morgan in clips from previous episodes\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">]\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This episode’s keyboard sounds were submitted by Alex Tran and recorded on his white EpoMaker High 75 keyboard….white and blue Epo-Maker Aula F99 keyboard…Gateron Milky Yellow Pro V2 switches.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">: We have fun here. The mechanical keyboard hobby took off in the mainstream fairly recently. From the satisfying ASMR typing videos to lull you to sleep, to the enviable color-coordinated custom builds all over Instagram, to the endless budget keyboard reviews that flood your For You page, mechanical keyboards are the content gift that keeps on giving. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ve been in a Keeb renaissance between the content and the sheer amount of affordable keyboard products on the market. But the mechanical keyboard market is changing, which means the whole hobby is changing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Today, we’re jumping into the world of mechanical keyboards. Where did this hobby come from? Why are people so into it anyway? And what’s up with the tariffs? Buckle up.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know how this goes. Let’s open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How to build a mechanical keyboard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hi, my name is Wonho Frank Lee and I love custom mechanical keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My friend Frank often jokes that his photography career funds his mechanical keyboard hobby. He’s designed and built dozens of keyboards for his friends, for his fellow enthusiasts that he met online, and of course, for himself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m ashamed to say this, but I have over 30 keyboards. So it’s not just about… \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I only have four, so…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughter]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey\u003c/span>\u003cb>, \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Four is great! People talk about, like, why are we spending so much money on the keyboard? And I just usually tell them, like how much of your day do you really sit in front of the computer and use your keyboard? Like how much time are you actually typing? Do you think you spend more time on your keyboard or in your car? If you’re going to spend a lot of time on it, might as well make it fun. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Frank also organizes KeebLife, the annual mechanical keyboard meetup I went to. And the rest of the year, he streams his builds on Twitch and runs Keeblife’s Discord server. His fellow enthusiasts have been called keebeheads, mechies, keebers, typebeasts, mechheads, keyaboos, and many, many more names. No matter what they’re called, this hobby is very community oriented. People turn to each other for advice, reviews, and to go in on group buys. Those are like mini Kickstarters for small batches of products. People pay up front, and sometimes it can take more than six months of manufacturing and shipping before they receive it. But for a lot of Keebheads, the exclusivity of getting a limited edition small batch keyboard makes the wait worth it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s also the big keyboard subreddit, r/MechanicalKeyboards, with more than 1.3 million members. And then more niche ones, like r/keebgirlies, r/BudgetKeebs, and the myriad of mechanical keyboard subreddits for specific countries. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Frank, for one, got into it in 2020 through a friend who is also a keyboard builder. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He was really into custom keyboards. He was getting into it too at the time. I kind of scoffed at it, like, why would you want to spend so much money on a keyboard? Like, I got a keyboard that works, that’s fine. But as I was part of his Discord server, and he was just always talking about keyboards with other people, I was like, ooh, okay, that kind of cool. Maybe I’ll get something. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He bought a very basic secondhand keyboard. Nothing special, but he customized it with some cheap knockoff Star Wars themed keycaps. The friend who introduced him to keyboards helped him add a few other custom parts. And that’s when Frank got really into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Seeing how he built it, how he soldered everything, it really got me like, excited. I’m like, oh my god, that’s kind of cool. The whole process of it was more exciting than the keyboard itself at one point. And as someone who loves Lego, uh, there was like a, oh wow, this is another level. Like, you can put things together. You just feel very accomplished afterwards. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mechanical keyboards are known for their onomatopoeia labels, like the very popular creamy boards. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The deeper, reverberating thocky. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The bright, bouncy poppy. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And even lighter, staccato clicky. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the loud, ostentatious clacky. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If they all sounded the same to you, you might just not be deep enough into the hobby yet. But Frank fell in love with the idea of chasing these sounds. He had a small following on Twitch from building Legos on stream during quarantine. So when Frank built his first ever mechanical keyboard from scratch, he did it over the course of a four hour live stream. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I was also getting a lot of help from the community members who were in the chat too. But once I was done, when I was doing the typing on stream, man…felt good.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Since then, Frank has built countless custom mechanical keyboards and he gave me a quick keyboard 101. There are a lot of components in a keyboard, all of which can affect the final sound and feel of the board. But let’s hit the highlights. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s start with the size: full boards have 104 keys, including a number pad on the side. But most people don’t use that, so they opt for smaller sizes. 75% boards are especially popular since they drop the number pad and a few other lesser used keys. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The benefit of this is you get more desk space. Now, why is that important? Well, gamers like to move their mouse quite a lot. And the keyboard layout gets even smaller than that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s a 60% board which drops the arrow keys. Then they get smaller and even more compact. Sometimes to the point of absurdity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve even seen like 10%, which is almost a joke. But some people kind of use it as a challenge, which is also kind of a fun thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keycaps are usually the first thing you notice about a keyboard. A lot of the builder’s personality shines through the keycaps, like the color combinations they use. The keycap profile or the way that it’s shaped and angled toward the typer also affects how comfortable the board is to use. At the heart of the board are the switches, the mechanical, spring-loaded part that tells your computer that you just pressed a key. The most popular ones are called linear. They’re smooth and ideal for really fast typing. Tactile switches require some more force to press, but a lot of people find that feedback satisfying. Then there’s Frank’s favorite: clicky. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Here we go. I’m going to click it for you guys. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like higher pitch. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It clicks higher pitch. And the difference between this switch and, for example, the MX Blue is MX Blue only clicks when you press it down. This one clicks both way up and down. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clicking sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how did this hobby get so big in the first place? That’s a new tab, but we’ll save opening that for after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So when did mechanical keyboards become such a thing? Time for a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The golden age of keyboard content. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The mechanical keyboard hobby would not be as popular as it is today without YouTube. So to guide us through this part of the deep dive is a YouTuber who has a lot of keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m Hipyo Tech. I am a keyboard content creator and general tech creator, YouTuber, whatever you want to call it. I’ve spent the last five years making videos and making custom keyboards and teaching the whole entire world how they could get into this crazy weird niche of a hobby. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">OK, so I am going to ask you a bit of a personal question, so I hope you’re ready. How many keyboards do you have? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Dang! Um, right now? Probably about 200. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh my God!\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But that’s because like at the end of last year, I got rid of about 80. So…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So this is you paring down? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, this is me pretty paired down, but usually five to six keyboards end up at my door. Like you can see there’s a pile of keyboards behind me in my video. These just arrived this week. And yeah, it’s it’s almost a nightmare, but really cool. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Building and modifying mechanical keyboards was once a relatively niche hobby. In the 1990s tech companies had phased out mechanical keyboards and rolled out cheaper, sleeker versions. Those had a squishy rubber dome under each key instead of springs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The original key heads sought to recreate the experience of using vintage keyboards. By the early 2000s, mechanical keyboard parts hit the markets and enthusiasts got really into experimenting with different materials to optimize the sound. Then in the 2010s, gaming companies rolled out pre-built mechanical keyboards, which were designed for more satisfying tactile feedback while furiously gaming. Keyboard hobbyists started going in on group buys together. Mechanical keyboards gained popularity as people flocked to blogs and then reddit to trade notes. Creators built a steady audience on YouTube and Twitch, where they documented their custom builds. Typing ASMR became a thriving genre of content. But it was pricey.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back then, all the parts needed for a custom mechanical keyboard, from the circuitry to the switches, could cost around $600. And that didn’t even include the labor costs involved in putting it together. The hobby wasn’t exactly mainstream until five years ago. And then it blew up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TaehaTypes in Clip] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is the typing test of Tfue’s multi-thousand dollar keyboard. [Typing]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In January 2020, YouTuber TaehaTypes streams the process of building a custom luxury mechanical keyboard for Tfue, a Fortnite streamer. The keyboard was housed in an iridescent aluminum and stainless steel frame that flashed fuchsia and cerulean and electric purple. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the stream, Taeha donned a delicate set of cloth gloves to unbox the casing from the manufacturer’s packaging. He meticulously lubed components with a thin paintbrush. Then with tranquil jazz playing in the background, he pulled out slender, angled tweezers and talked viewers through the process of preparing the circuit board. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TaehaTypes in Clip] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>\u003ci> \u003c/i>\u003c/b>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m going across the PCB and I am essentially closing the loop between the switch. \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Watching the precision involved in building the board was mesmerizing. And then Taeha posted an ASMR video featuring him typing on the board. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing Sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A lot of people had never heard anything like it. Frank Lee, who we heard from earlier, said that was the moment that mechanical keyboards went mainstream. And Hipyo pointed out that Taeha’s glitzy keyboard introduced a whole new audience to the hobby. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He was the spark where it was like, he had started to get big at the perfect point to just pull everybody into the hobby. He was almost everybody’s like, first, like, oh, whoa, keyboards are cool kind of moment. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Betty Van, another keyboard YouTuber who runs a channel, Switch and Click, also pointed to that same moment in internet history\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Betty Van: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">With the Fortnite players learning about that keyboard and then 60% keyboards becoming more popular with gamers, too like that started this big thing of like keyboards for gamers. But also people started working from home, so keyboards for office people. It’s like two groups at once that it’s just really big. It’s like an explosion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And here’s Hipyo again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Suddenly, everybody was like, wait, you can have a keyboard that sounds good, started funneling into the hobby, which kind of boosted up all of these burgeoning creators who are just kind of into this weird niche and making videos. So 2021, there was tons of creators that got the YouTube algorithm rocket, we were all making videos together. It was insane. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It seems like when you first got into it in 2020, a lot of the hobby was more about tinkering, customizing, and it seems now a lot more of it is like collecting. Was it always that way or is it, is that relatively new? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s kind of shifted a little bit more consumer-y, which is kind of a bummer because the tinkering was the funnest aspect of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Manufacturers in China noticed the uptick in mechanical keyboard interest and started to produce pre-built keyboards designed and assembled en masse in-house. So instead of spending upwards of $700 on custom parts to build their own, buyers could now grab a decent one off the shelf for $200. All they had to do was plug it in. Here’s Frank again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That movement really changed everything since then, in my opinion. The custom keyboard hobby that I knew and I got into has shrunk quite a bit in a sense because of so many keyboards that are coming in now. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And Hippio said this shift also affected the kind of content people want to watch. When he started out on YouTube in 2020, his videos ranged from in-depth switch reviews to building keyboards with wacky modifications. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Hipyo Tech in clip] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re filling this bad boy with some Play-Doh, which I don’t necessarily recommend, but I felt like doing it. So here we are. \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But now, people aren’t as interested in building a keyboard from scratch. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What made keyboards so interesting as a hobby is that they were fundamentally flawed. Like, people hadn’t quite figured out how to make the aluminum cases not sound really pingy and terrible, or they hadn’t figured out factory lubrication on switches that made them feel really smooth and buttery. So you kind of had to do all that stuff yourself, where it’s like people had figured out, hey, if I take this switch apart and I spend four hours lubing a whole batch of switches, my keyboard will sound and feel better. That was like a really great way to get you in like engaging in the hobby and tinkering with like, oh, maybe this lube will feel different. Or maybe if I swap this spring out, my switch will feel differently. And most of that’s been solved now at like, the production level, where you could buy a keyboard for 100 bucks nowadays that would give you a better experience than a keyboard that might have cost you 400 bucks back in 2020. It’s like, it’s almost solved in a weird way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. I mean, obviously, the tinkering aspect is a huge part of your content and also your creator origin story. How do you feel about that part of the hobby becoming less popular? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s really bittersweet. Like, I mean, you spend five years screaming at brands to make better keyboards and you’re tinkering with keyboards to make them better. And then suddenly they’re all listening, which means that you don’t need to tinker with keyboards. It like, it’s everything that I was asking for brands are now doing like, even Asus and Razer and Corsair, like all of these huge gaming brands where I’m like talking to their teams behind the scenes. You guys, if you literally just got one machine that could lubricate your switches, they’d be so much better. And they’re like, oh, no, it’s not, there’s no demand. And suddenly they’re doing it now. It’s like, wait, I hurt myself. Like, there’s still people out there that are really passionately modding keyboards. But for the vast majority of people now, there’s like almost no point. So it’s really bittersweet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Betty has actually shifted the content of her channel entirely. One of the main reasons is this dip in custom keyboard popularity. She still makes keyboard videos, but the videos that do well are typically reviews of pre-built budget keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Betty Van: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like economically, there’s been less views on just specific keyboard content. Like before, if some company released a keyboard and we talked about it, it would get more views and more people would buy it or there’d be more interest in the product. But nowadays, I think everyone already has a good enough keyboard that they’re not necessarily interested in looking for their next upgrade. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But,\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">there’s another factor that complicates just about everything in the hobby. It’s another reason Betty’s team has switched to more general tech content. Tariffs. One more tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is de minimis? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back in April, following what President Trump dubbed Liberation Day, all imports into the US were slapped with a minimum 10% tariff. It’s been months of back and forth with other countries of retaliatory fees and tenuous deals and debates over the legality of all of this. But throughout it all, there was still the de minimis exemption. That’s a special rule, which said that shipments valued under a certain amount could enter the US without tariffs or much oversight. Until recently, that threshold was $800. But that rule ended August 29th of this year, which means that buying anything from abroad just got a lot more expensive. And it’s consumers and business owners taking the hit. Because of the uncertainty, many companies paused all shipping to the U.S. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">At KeebLife, I talked to a keyboard enthusiast who goes by Jazzzster. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jazzzster\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">:\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was actually visiting China recently. I actually asked the person that was designing the board…I was like, can I pick up this keyboard, since I’m here? I know that you’re not shipping it out to people in the US, but can you help me have the keyboard now?\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wait, so you bought, you like preordered it in the U.S. and then… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jazzzster\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">:\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then I was, like, I think it’s going to be done being manufactured about right now, right? I’m luckily here at the same time. Can I pick it up? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The keyboard brand Osume also suspended U.S. orders in February. The company is based in Canada and warned customers that existing shipments could be hit with an additional 10 to 35 percent tariff. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Clement Cheung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was basically almost impossible to have our products delivered from Canada to the States. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s Clement Cheung, Osume’s revenue analyst. In August, the company opened a special U.S. based warehouse and resumed shipping to American customers. The caveat? They had to raise prices. A keyboard that used to be $170 is now $220. Although the U.S. Warehouse has worked out so far, Clement said moving manufacturing from China to the U.S. just to avoid tariffs would be very unrealistic. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Clement Cheung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">China has years of experience building and manufacturing keycaps in a really specific environment. And that environment changes everything about a keyboard: the sound, the quality, as well as the longevity. Compared to if we were to do it in the States, to replicate that consistency and quality is very difficult. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Newbies, custom DIYers, and the vast majority of mechanical keyboard enthusiasts still rely on products made in China. Now, it’s further complicated by the end of de minimis. Those extra fees can make a reasonably priced purchase suddenly unaffordable. Some consumers have paid more in tariffs than what they paid for the item itself. It’s really affecting independent designers, like Frank, who designed a custom keyboard as a passion project. He sourced a vendor in China to help with manufacturing all the parts, set up a group buy, and found a few other enthusiasts to go in on it. The tariff announcement came in just before they started production. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For some people, $300 for this particular keyboard sounded really good value. But if they end up having to pay 400 bucks, it’s not really a good value anymore. So who takes the hit in that case, you know? And in a smaller group buy, like me, where I literally have just over 100 units sold, that impact is even bigger. Because I wasn’t doing this to make money to begin with. If I get hit with this, I don’t have a lot of buffer to pay for it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some small batch keyboards don’t even make it to the market, or they’re hit with long delays, like one brand that Betty recently tried to work with. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Betty Van: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There was this one moment where we were going to cover a keyboard that was going to launch on Kickstarter. And the brand had told us, like, this is going to release on this date. So we scheduled our video like, right before the date that it would launch. But it didn’t launch because the tariffs were announced and they were like, we’re going to push back the launch. But we released the video anyways, and that video didn’t do as well, mostly because, well, no one could buy the keyboard, for one. So it was like a really unquestionable time in this space. So like there’s been internal discussions on our team about like, hey, we need to branch out. Like we need to experiment with our content to find something else that’s going to hit. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hipyo said these\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">unpredictable extra fees have been devastating for the hobby, which was built on group buys and supporting other enthusiasts’ creativity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The de minimis exemption allowed a lot of these small brands to start up. You could buy a keyboard. It would ship to you. No import tariffs. So great! What a novel idea. And now I’ve heard from, I talked to a couple big companies that I worked with before, like, this interview, just to see, like, how is this affecting you guys? It was way worse than I thought.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How so? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like, they’re having so many customers just deny packages and return packages because the customer doesn’t know what tariffs they’re going to be paying. The brand doesn’t how much in tariffs the customers are going to be paying. There’s some people getting hit with a $150 tariffs on a $100 keyboard order. Like that…that doesn’t make any sense! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. How is it affecting creators like yourself specifically? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For me this year, like I’ve had many, many sponsors tell me, like, hey, we just don’t have the budget for videos anymore because we had to spend all of our budget on paying import taxes to start up U.S. Warehouses because a lot of these companies are like ‘we have to start a U. S. Warehouse because nobody’s going to buy our products and pay these tariffs.’ And there’s so many unknowns floating around. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But on top of that, I mean, I personally paid, I think over three thousand dollars in tariffs this year …\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> …just from brands sending me unsolicited keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t know it’s coming, but then I get hit with, ‘oh, hey, DHL says you have to pay $150 to get this keyboard’…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and they’re like declaring real…yeah. So for me it’s I mean, it’s business expense, whatever. But yeah, it it’s real. It’s very real. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, with the current economic climate, with a state of tariffs, like with what consumers are looking for now, like, is that affecting your content and the kind of videos you’re making? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, well, I mean, I can tell you from my personal experience, like, if I make a video on a keyboard that’s more than $100, way less interest than if it’s a budget focused keyboard, because in general, consumers are just feeling really, really strained right now. And that’s ignoring tariffs. Like, that’s just focusing on stuff from Amazon because in general, now somebody doesn’t want to buy a keyboard from China if it means that they’re going to get hit with these tariffs. Yeah. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wow. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, it’s truly a nightmare for so many small businesses. Like, it’s insane. It’s made it so small businesses can’t experiment very much because you have to just really play it safe. Like we used to experiment by having a ton of different key cap sets and a ton of different desk mats, and it didn’t matter as much what did great because like, everything kept the boat floating. But when the stakes are like so much higher now, it’s reducing innovation. It’s adding so much more uncertainty. And like there’s been a couple other keyboard companies that are like, ‘we might just pull out like we might just stop making keyboards.’ \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wow. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I can’t say those brands. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because everything is moving toward pre-built and all that and like, there’s less incentive to innovate. Do you think people will go back to that kind of mentality of tinkering and of customizing because the companies aren’t willing to take risks anymore? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I really hope so. Like, I hope it’s kind of cyclical where it’s like people will go back to just like, having a little bit less options and kind of enjoying the craft of it more because building keyboards is still so fun. And the idea of customizing a tool that you use every day is so fulfilling. But like, when all of the economic forces are kind of making you buy a pre-built keyboard, it’s, you don’t really have a choice. So I really do hope that it moves that way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the custom keyboard world, people are always searching for their endgame: the keyboard that’s so perfect, so tailored to their specific preferences that they’ll never have to buy or build another keyboard again. It’s a constant process of trial and error and experimenting with different modifications. A lot of hobbyists have put that endgame hunt on hold thanks to the tariffs and uncertainty of trade relations. Frank, for one, is over the idea of chasing an endgame. For now, he’s finding joy in the collection that he already has. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The beauty of custom is that you can have so many different kinds of things, not just one thing that you just like. And I love that. So I have a bunch of different layouts, different colors and keycaps. I have different switches and typing feels on all my keyboards. I have a rotation. I go through every day, I kind of change up, that’s like, one of my rituals. Like before I get to my computer, I bring out another keyboard. Oh, yeah, I feel like using this. There’s really no endgame for me. I would say my goal is to always have a collection that I am very happy with. And I’m kind of happy with that right now. Yeah. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whether your keeb is a luxury custom build or a pre-built budget find, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Chris Egusa and edited by Chris Hambrick. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our senior editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s director of podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa, additional music by APM, audio engineering by Brendan Willard and Brian Douglas. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our editor in chief. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California local. Keyboard sounds in this episode were submitted by Frank Lee, including his Geonwerks F1-K Bingsu Edition, DNworks Ryujin and HHHH Salamander PC keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I know it’s a podcast cliche, but it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to the show. Thanks for listening.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "In this episode Morgan examines the mechanical keyboard craze and how tariffs are now impacting the hobby.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1759369940,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 130,
"wordCount": 5769
},
"headData": {
"title": "In Search of Thock: The Quest for the Perfect Keyboard | KQED",
"description": "“Clicky,” “Clacky,” and “Poppy” may sound like the latest cereal elves but they’re actually ways to describe the sounds of typing on a mechanical keyboard. What started as a niche hobby blew up during the pandemic, with a huge influx of creators posting tutorials, reviews, and soothing ASMR videos on social media. Many hobbyists are so enthusiastic about achieving the perfect sound, feel and response from their personal keyboards that they design and build their own, sometimes spending hundreds of dollars on custom parts. Lately though, the industry has been hitting some serious roadblocks. In this episode Morgan examines how the mechanical keyboard craze took off, and why it may now be starting to fade. We’ll hear from creators about how tariffs and the end of the de minimis rule are affecting everyone — from consumers to indie designers, to content creators. ",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "“Clicky,” “Clacky,” and “Poppy” may sound like the latest cereal elves but they’re actually ways to describe the sounds of typing on a mechanical keyboard. What started as a niche hobby blew up during the pandemic, with a huge influx of creators posting tutorials, reviews, and soothing ASMR videos on social media. Many hobbyists are so enthusiastic about achieving the perfect sound, feel and response from their personal keyboards that they design and build their own, sometimes spending hundreds of dollars on custom parts. Lately though, the industry has been hitting some serious roadblocks. In this episode Morgan examines how the mechanical keyboard craze took off, and why it may now be starting to fade. We’ll hear from creators about how tariffs and the end of the de minimis rule are affecting everyone — from consumers to indie designers, to content creators. ",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "In Search of Thock: The Quest for the Perfect Keyboard",
"datePublished": "2025-10-01T03:00:46-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-10-01T18:52:20-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC7054753045.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"nprStoryId": "kqed-12058181",
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12058181/in-search-of-thock-the-quest-for-the-perfect-keyboard",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">“Clacky,” “Poppy,” and “Thocky” may sound like the latest cereal elves, but they’re actually terms to describe the sounds of typing on a mechanical keyboard. What started as a niche hobby blew up during the pandemic, with a huge influx of creators posting tutorials, reviews, and soothing ASMR videos on social media. Many hobbyists are so enthusiastic about achieving the perfect sound, feel and response from their personal keyboards that they design and build their own, sometimes spending hundreds of dollars on custom parts.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lately though, the industry has been hitting some serious roadblocks. In this episode Morgan examines how the mechanical keyboard craze took off, and why it may now be starting to fade. We’ll hear from creators about how tariffs and the end of the \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">de minimis\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> rule are affecting everyone — from consumers to indie designers, to content creators. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC7054753045\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/enomooshikey/?hl=en\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Frank Lee\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, keyboard streamer and organizer of KeebLife\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/c/hipyotech\">Hipyo Tech\u003c/a>, YouTube creator\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/@SwitchandClickOfficial\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Betty Van\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, YouTube creator\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theverge.com/2020/1/29/21112581/taeha-types-mechanical-keyboards-custom-twitch-tfue-fortnite-streaming\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Twitch streamer behind Tfue’s custom $3,500 mechanical keyboard \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Nick Statt, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Verge\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/04/looming-tariffs-are-making-it-extra-hard-to-be-a-tech-geek/\">Looming tariffs are making it extra hard to be a tech geek \u003c/a>— Scharon Harding, \u003ci>Ars Technica\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>\u003ci>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/i>\u003c/b>\u003cb>\u003ci>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/i>\u003c/b>\u003cb>Kaylee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Each of these are all linear switches, but this one has the deepest sound, my cat keyboard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Kaylee, a mechanical keyboard builder and content creator who also goes by Sad Girl Types. She’s showing me one of her favorite builds, a cat-themed keyboard complete with a fuzzy calico cover. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kaylee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It has fur on it, so you can pet it. It is the color of a calico cat, and all of the keycaps are also calico colored. Yeah, that’s it. It’s a cat keyboard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I recently spent my Saturday afternoon wandering around a crowded convention hall ballroom, tapping and typing on so many keyboards that I lost count. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Typing sounds\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">]\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This was Keeb Life, an annual meetup for custom mechanical keyboard enthusiasts. On the edges of the ballroom, vendors sold unique keycaps and switches and other keyboard accessories. In the center of the room were rows and rows of folding tables, where attendees showed off their own custom builds. Each keyboard was accompanied by a card labeled with the builder’s Discord username and the details of their keyboard, literally down to each individual part. The cards also noted whether attendees were allowed to touch and pick up the keyboard. Each board was unique, and I tried almost all of them. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In case you haven’t noticed, Close All Tabs has a running bit about mechanical keyboards. At the end of each episode, we credit the keyboards that we use whenever we open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Morgan in clips from previous episodes\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">]\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This episode’s keyboard sounds were submitted by Alex Tran and recorded on his white EpoMaker High 75 keyboard….white and blue Epo-Maker Aula F99 keyboard…Gateron Milky Yellow Pro V2 switches.\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">: We have fun here. The mechanical keyboard hobby took off in the mainstream fairly recently. From the satisfying ASMR typing videos to lull you to sleep, to the enviable color-coordinated custom builds all over Instagram, to the endless budget keyboard reviews that flood your For You page, mechanical keyboards are the content gift that keeps on giving. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ve been in a Keeb renaissance between the content and the sheer amount of affordable keyboard products on the market. But the mechanical keyboard market is changing, which means the whole hobby is changing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Today, we’re jumping into the world of mechanical keyboards. Where did this hobby come from? Why are people so into it anyway? And what’s up with the tariffs? Buckle up.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know how this goes. Let’s open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How to build a mechanical keyboard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hi, my name is Wonho Frank Lee and I love custom mechanical keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My friend Frank often jokes that his photography career funds his mechanical keyboard hobby. He’s designed and built dozens of keyboards for his friends, for his fellow enthusiasts that he met online, and of course, for himself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m ashamed to say this, but I have over 30 keyboards. So it’s not just about… \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I only have four, so…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughter]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey\u003c/span>\u003cb>, \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Four is great! People talk about, like, why are we spending so much money on the keyboard? And I just usually tell them, like how much of your day do you really sit in front of the computer and use your keyboard? Like how much time are you actually typing? Do you think you spend more time on your keyboard or in your car? If you’re going to spend a lot of time on it, might as well make it fun. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Frank also organizes KeebLife, the annual mechanical keyboard meetup I went to. And the rest of the year, he streams his builds on Twitch and runs Keeblife’s Discord server. His fellow enthusiasts have been called keebeheads, mechies, keebers, typebeasts, mechheads, keyaboos, and many, many more names. No matter what they’re called, this hobby is very community oriented. People turn to each other for advice, reviews, and to go in on group buys. Those are like mini Kickstarters for small batches of products. People pay up front, and sometimes it can take more than six months of manufacturing and shipping before they receive it. But for a lot of Keebheads, the exclusivity of getting a limited edition small batch keyboard makes the wait worth it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s also the big keyboard subreddit, r/MechanicalKeyboards, with more than 1.3 million members. And then more niche ones, like r/keebgirlies, r/BudgetKeebs, and the myriad of mechanical keyboard subreddits for specific countries. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Frank, for one, got into it in 2020 through a friend who is also a keyboard builder. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He was really into custom keyboards. He was getting into it too at the time. I kind of scoffed at it, like, why would you want to spend so much money on a keyboard? Like, I got a keyboard that works, that’s fine. But as I was part of his Discord server, and he was just always talking about keyboards with other people, I was like, ooh, okay, that kind of cool. Maybe I’ll get something. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He bought a very basic secondhand keyboard. Nothing special, but he customized it with some cheap knockoff Star Wars themed keycaps. The friend who introduced him to keyboards helped him add a few other custom parts. And that’s when Frank got really into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Seeing how he built it, how he soldered everything, it really got me like, excited. I’m like, oh my god, that’s kind of cool. The whole process of it was more exciting than the keyboard itself at one point. And as someone who loves Lego, uh, there was like a, oh wow, this is another level. Like, you can put things together. You just feel very accomplished afterwards. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mechanical keyboards are known for their onomatopoeia labels, like the very popular creamy boards. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The deeper, reverberating thocky. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The bright, bouncy poppy. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And even lighter, staccato clicky. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the loud, ostentatious clacky. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If they all sounded the same to you, you might just not be deep enough into the hobby yet. But Frank fell in love with the idea of chasing these sounds. He had a small following on Twitch from building Legos on stream during quarantine. So when Frank built his first ever mechanical keyboard from scratch, he did it over the course of a four hour live stream. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I was also getting a lot of help from the community members who were in the chat too. But once I was done, when I was doing the typing on stream, man…felt good.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Since then, Frank has built countless custom mechanical keyboards and he gave me a quick keyboard 101. There are a lot of components in a keyboard, all of which can affect the final sound and feel of the board. But let’s hit the highlights. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s start with the size: full boards have 104 keys, including a number pad on the side. But most people don’t use that, so they opt for smaller sizes. 75% boards are especially popular since they drop the number pad and a few other lesser used keys. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The benefit of this is you get more desk space. Now, why is that important? Well, gamers like to move their mouse quite a lot. And the keyboard layout gets even smaller than that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s a 60% board which drops the arrow keys. Then they get smaller and even more compact. Sometimes to the point of absurdity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve even seen like 10%, which is almost a joke. But some people kind of use it as a challenge, which is also kind of a fun thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keycaps are usually the first thing you notice about a keyboard. A lot of the builder’s personality shines through the keycaps, like the color combinations they use. The keycap profile or the way that it’s shaped and angled toward the typer also affects how comfortable the board is to use. At the heart of the board are the switches, the mechanical, spring-loaded part that tells your computer that you just pressed a key. The most popular ones are called linear. They’re smooth and ideal for really fast typing. Tactile switches require some more force to press, but a lot of people find that feedback satisfying. Then there’s Frank’s favorite: clicky. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Here we go. I’m going to click it for you guys. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like higher pitch. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It clicks higher pitch. And the difference between this switch and, for example, the MX Blue is MX Blue only clicks when you press it down. This one clicks both way up and down. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Clicking sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how did this hobby get so big in the first place? That’s a new tab, but we’ll save opening that for after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So when did mechanical keyboards become such a thing? Time for a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The golden age of keyboard content. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The mechanical keyboard hobby would not be as popular as it is today without YouTube. So to guide us through this part of the deep dive is a YouTuber who has a lot of keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m Hipyo Tech. I am a keyboard content creator and general tech creator, YouTuber, whatever you want to call it. I’ve spent the last five years making videos and making custom keyboards and teaching the whole entire world how they could get into this crazy weird niche of a hobby. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">OK, so I am going to ask you a bit of a personal question, so I hope you’re ready. How many keyboards do you have? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Dang! Um, right now? Probably about 200. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh my God!\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But that’s because like at the end of last year, I got rid of about 80. So…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So this is you paring down? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, this is me pretty paired down, but usually five to six keyboards end up at my door. Like you can see there’s a pile of keyboards behind me in my video. These just arrived this week. And yeah, it’s it’s almost a nightmare, but really cool. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Building and modifying mechanical keyboards was once a relatively niche hobby. In the 1990s tech companies had phased out mechanical keyboards and rolled out cheaper, sleeker versions. Those had a squishy rubber dome under each key instead of springs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The original key heads sought to recreate the experience of using vintage keyboards. By the early 2000s, mechanical keyboard parts hit the markets and enthusiasts got really into experimenting with different materials to optimize the sound. Then in the 2010s, gaming companies rolled out pre-built mechanical keyboards, which were designed for more satisfying tactile feedback while furiously gaming. Keyboard hobbyists started going in on group buys together. Mechanical keyboards gained popularity as people flocked to blogs and then reddit to trade notes. Creators built a steady audience on YouTube and Twitch, where they documented their custom builds. Typing ASMR became a thriving genre of content. But it was pricey.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back then, all the parts needed for a custom mechanical keyboard, from the circuitry to the switches, could cost around $600. And that didn’t even include the labor costs involved in putting it together. The hobby wasn’t exactly mainstream until five years ago. And then it blew up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TaehaTypes in Clip] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is the typing test of Tfue’s multi-thousand dollar keyboard. [Typing]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In January 2020, YouTuber TaehaTypes streams the process of building a custom luxury mechanical keyboard for Tfue, a Fortnite streamer. The keyboard was housed in an iridescent aluminum and stainless steel frame that flashed fuchsia and cerulean and electric purple. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the stream, Taeha donned a delicate set of cloth gloves to unbox the casing from the manufacturer’s packaging. He meticulously lubed components with a thin paintbrush. Then with tranquil jazz playing in the background, he pulled out slender, angled tweezers and talked viewers through the process of preparing the circuit board. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[TaehaTypes in Clip] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cb>\u003ci> \u003c/i>\u003c/b>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m going across the PCB and I am essentially closing the loop between the switch. \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Watching the precision involved in building the board was mesmerizing. And then Taeha posted an ASMR video featuring him typing on the board. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing Sounds]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A lot of people had never heard anything like it. Frank Lee, who we heard from earlier, said that was the moment that mechanical keyboards went mainstream. And Hipyo pointed out that Taeha’s glitzy keyboard introduced a whole new audience to the hobby. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He was the spark where it was like, he had started to get big at the perfect point to just pull everybody into the hobby. He was almost everybody’s like, first, like, oh, whoa, keyboards are cool kind of moment. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Betty Van, another keyboard YouTuber who runs a channel, Switch and Click, also pointed to that same moment in internet history\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Betty Van: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">With the Fortnite players learning about that keyboard and then 60% keyboards becoming more popular with gamers, too like that started this big thing of like keyboards for gamers. But also people started working from home, so keyboards for office people. It’s like two groups at once that it’s just really big. It’s like an explosion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And here’s Hipyo again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Suddenly, everybody was like, wait, you can have a keyboard that sounds good, started funneling into the hobby, which kind of boosted up all of these burgeoning creators who are just kind of into this weird niche and making videos. So 2021, there was tons of creators that got the YouTube algorithm rocket, we were all making videos together. It was insane. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It seems like when you first got into it in 2020, a lot of the hobby was more about tinkering, customizing, and it seems now a lot more of it is like collecting. Was it always that way or is it, is that relatively new? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s kind of shifted a little bit more consumer-y, which is kind of a bummer because the tinkering was the funnest aspect of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Manufacturers in China noticed the uptick in mechanical keyboard interest and started to produce pre-built keyboards designed and assembled en masse in-house. So instead of spending upwards of $700 on custom parts to build their own, buyers could now grab a decent one off the shelf for $200. All they had to do was plug it in. Here’s Frank again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That movement really changed everything since then, in my opinion. The custom keyboard hobby that I knew and I got into has shrunk quite a bit in a sense because of so many keyboards that are coming in now. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And Hippio said this shift also affected the kind of content people want to watch. When he started out on YouTube in 2020, his videos ranged from in-depth switch reviews to building keyboards with wacky modifications. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Hipyo Tech in clip] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re filling this bad boy with some Play-Doh, which I don’t necessarily recommend, but I felt like doing it. So here we are. \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But now, people aren’t as interested in building a keyboard from scratch. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What made keyboards so interesting as a hobby is that they were fundamentally flawed. Like, people hadn’t quite figured out how to make the aluminum cases not sound really pingy and terrible, or they hadn’t figured out factory lubrication on switches that made them feel really smooth and buttery. So you kind of had to do all that stuff yourself, where it’s like people had figured out, hey, if I take this switch apart and I spend four hours lubing a whole batch of switches, my keyboard will sound and feel better. That was like a really great way to get you in like engaging in the hobby and tinkering with like, oh, maybe this lube will feel different. Or maybe if I swap this spring out, my switch will feel differently. And most of that’s been solved now at like, the production level, where you could buy a keyboard for 100 bucks nowadays that would give you a better experience than a keyboard that might have cost you 400 bucks back in 2020. It’s like, it’s almost solved in a weird way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. I mean, obviously, the tinkering aspect is a huge part of your content and also your creator origin story. How do you feel about that part of the hobby becoming less popular? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s really bittersweet. Like, I mean, you spend five years screaming at brands to make better keyboards and you’re tinkering with keyboards to make them better. And then suddenly they’re all listening, which means that you don’t need to tinker with keyboards. It like, it’s everything that I was asking for brands are now doing like, even Asus and Razer and Corsair, like all of these huge gaming brands where I’m like talking to their teams behind the scenes. You guys, if you literally just got one machine that could lubricate your switches, they’d be so much better. And they’re like, oh, no, it’s not, there’s no demand. And suddenly they’re doing it now. It’s like, wait, I hurt myself. Like, there’s still people out there that are really passionately modding keyboards. But for the vast majority of people now, there’s like almost no point. So it’s really bittersweet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Betty has actually shifted the content of her channel entirely. One of the main reasons is this dip in custom keyboard popularity. She still makes keyboard videos, but the videos that do well are typically reviews of pre-built budget keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Betty Van: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like economically, there’s been less views on just specific keyboard content. Like before, if some company released a keyboard and we talked about it, it would get more views and more people would buy it or there’d be more interest in the product. But nowadays, I think everyone already has a good enough keyboard that they’re not necessarily interested in looking for their next upgrade. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But,\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">there’s another factor that complicates just about everything in the hobby. It’s another reason Betty’s team has switched to more general tech content. Tariffs. One more tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Typing sounds] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is de minimis? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back in April, following what President Trump dubbed Liberation Day, all imports into the US were slapped with a minimum 10% tariff. It’s been months of back and forth with other countries of retaliatory fees and tenuous deals and debates over the legality of all of this. But throughout it all, there was still the de minimis exemption. That’s a special rule, which said that shipments valued under a certain amount could enter the US without tariffs or much oversight. Until recently, that threshold was $800. But that rule ended August 29th of this year, which means that buying anything from abroad just got a lot more expensive. And it’s consumers and business owners taking the hit. Because of the uncertainty, many companies paused all shipping to the U.S. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">At KeebLife, I talked to a keyboard enthusiast who goes by Jazzzster. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jazzzster\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">:\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was actually visiting China recently. I actually asked the person that was designing the board…I was like, can I pick up this keyboard, since I’m here? I know that you’re not shipping it out to people in the US, but can you help me have the keyboard now?\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wait, so you bought, you like preordered it in the U.S. and then… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jazzzster\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">:\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then I was, like, I think it’s going to be done being manufactured about right now, right? I’m luckily here at the same time. Can I pick it up? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The keyboard brand Osume also suspended U.S. orders in February. The company is based in Canada and warned customers that existing shipments could be hit with an additional 10 to 35 percent tariff. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Clement Cheung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was basically almost impossible to have our products delivered from Canada to the States. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s Clement Cheung, Osume’s revenue analyst. In August, the company opened a special U.S. based warehouse and resumed shipping to American customers. The caveat? They had to raise prices. A keyboard that used to be $170 is now $220. Although the U.S. Warehouse has worked out so far, Clement said moving manufacturing from China to the U.S. just to avoid tariffs would be very unrealistic. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Clement Cheung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">China has years of experience building and manufacturing keycaps in a really specific environment. And that environment changes everything about a keyboard: the sound, the quality, as well as the longevity. Compared to if we were to do it in the States, to replicate that consistency and quality is very difficult. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Newbies, custom DIYers, and the vast majority of mechanical keyboard enthusiasts still rely on products made in China. Now, it’s further complicated by the end of de minimis. Those extra fees can make a reasonably priced purchase suddenly unaffordable. Some consumers have paid more in tariffs than what they paid for the item itself. It’s really affecting independent designers, like Frank, who designed a custom keyboard as a passion project. He sourced a vendor in China to help with manufacturing all the parts, set up a group buy, and found a few other enthusiasts to go in on it. The tariff announcement came in just before they started production. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For some people, $300 for this particular keyboard sounded really good value. But if they end up having to pay 400 bucks, it’s not really a good value anymore. So who takes the hit in that case, you know? And in a smaller group buy, like me, where I literally have just over 100 units sold, that impact is even bigger. Because I wasn’t doing this to make money to begin with. If I get hit with this, I don’t have a lot of buffer to pay for it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some small batch keyboards don’t even make it to the market, or they’re hit with long delays, like one brand that Betty recently tried to work with. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Betty Van: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There was this one moment where we were going to cover a keyboard that was going to launch on Kickstarter. And the brand had told us, like, this is going to release on this date. So we scheduled our video like, right before the date that it would launch. But it didn’t launch because the tariffs were announced and they were like, we’re going to push back the launch. But we released the video anyways, and that video didn’t do as well, mostly because, well, no one could buy the keyboard, for one. So it was like a really unquestionable time in this space. So like there’s been internal discussions on our team about like, hey, we need to branch out. Like we need to experiment with our content to find something else that’s going to hit. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hipyo said these\u003c/span> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">unpredictable extra fees have been devastating for the hobby, which was built on group buys and supporting other enthusiasts’ creativity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The de minimis exemption allowed a lot of these small brands to start up. You could buy a keyboard. It would ship to you. No import tariffs. So great! What a novel idea. And now I’ve heard from, I talked to a couple big companies that I worked with before, like, this interview, just to see, like, how is this affecting you guys? It was way worse than I thought.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How so? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like, they’re having so many customers just deny packages and return packages because the customer doesn’t know what tariffs they’re going to be paying. The brand doesn’t how much in tariffs the customers are going to be paying. There’s some people getting hit with a $150 tariffs on a $100 keyboard order. Like that…that doesn’t make any sense! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. How is it affecting creators like yourself specifically? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For me this year, like I’ve had many, many sponsors tell me, like, hey, we just don’t have the budget for videos anymore because we had to spend all of our budget on paying import taxes to start up U.S. Warehouses because a lot of these companies are like ‘we have to start a U. S. Warehouse because nobody’s going to buy our products and pay these tariffs.’ And there’s so many unknowns floating around. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But on top of that, I mean, I personally paid, I think over three thousand dollars in tariffs this year …\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> …just from brands sending me unsolicited keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs] \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t know it’s coming, but then I get hit with, ‘oh, hey, DHL says you have to pay $150 to get this keyboard’…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech:\u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> and they’re like declaring real…yeah. So for me it’s I mean, it’s business expense, whatever. But yeah, it it’s real. It’s very real. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, with the current economic climate, with a state of tariffs, like with what consumers are looking for now, like, is that affecting your content and the kind of videos you’re making? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, well, I mean, I can tell you from my personal experience, like, if I make a video on a keyboard that’s more than $100, way less interest than if it’s a budget focused keyboard, because in general, consumers are just feeling really, really strained right now. And that’s ignoring tariffs. Like, that’s just focusing on stuff from Amazon because in general, now somebody doesn’t want to buy a keyboard from China if it means that they’re going to get hit with these tariffs. Yeah. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wow. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, it’s truly a nightmare for so many small businesses. Like, it’s insane. It’s made it so small businesses can’t experiment very much because you have to just really play it safe. Like we used to experiment by having a ton of different key cap sets and a ton of different desk mats, and it didn’t matter as much what did great because like, everything kept the boat floating. But when the stakes are like so much higher now, it’s reducing innovation. It’s adding so much more uncertainty. And like there’s been a couple other keyboard companies that are like, ‘we might just pull out like we might just stop making keyboards.’ \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Wow. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I can’t say those brands. \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Laughs]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because everything is moving toward pre-built and all that and like, there’s less incentive to innovate. Do you think people will go back to that kind of mentality of tinkering and of customizing because the companies aren’t willing to take risks anymore? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Hipyo Tech: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I really hope so. Like, I hope it’s kind of cyclical where it’s like people will go back to just like, having a little bit less options and kind of enjoying the craft of it more because building keyboards is still so fun. And the idea of customizing a tool that you use every day is so fulfilling. But like, when all of the economic forces are kind of making you buy a pre-built keyboard, it’s, you don’t really have a choice. So I really do hope that it moves that way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the custom keyboard world, people are always searching for their endgame: the keyboard that’s so perfect, so tailored to their specific preferences that they’ll never have to buy or build another keyboard again. It’s a constant process of trial and error and experimenting with different modifications. A lot of hobbyists have put that endgame hunt on hold thanks to the tariffs and uncertainty of trade relations. Frank, for one, is over the idea of chasing an endgame. For now, he’s finding joy in the collection that he already has. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Frank Lee: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The beauty of custom is that you can have so many different kinds of things, not just one thing that you just like. And I love that. So I have a bunch of different layouts, different colors and keycaps. I have different switches and typing feels on all my keyboards. I have a rotation. I go through every day, I kind of change up, that’s like, one of my rituals. Like before I get to my computer, I bring out another keyboard. Oh, yeah, I feel like using this. There’s really no endgame for me. I would say my goal is to always have a collection that I am very happy with. And I’m kind of happy with that right now. Yeah. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whether your keeb is a luxury custom build or a pre-built budget find, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">[Music]\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Chris Egusa and edited by Chris Hambrick. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our senior editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s director of podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa, additional music by APM, audio engineering by Brendan Willard and Brian Douglas. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our editor in chief. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California local. Keyboard sounds in this episode were submitted by Frank Lee, including his Geonwerks F1-K Bingsu Edition, DNworks Ryujin and HHHH Salamander PC keyboards. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I know it’s a podcast cliche, but it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to the show. Thanks for listening.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12058181/in-search-of-thock-the-quest-for-the-perfect-keyboard",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11869",
"11832",
"11943"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_22973",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_23908",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12058226",
"label": "source_news_12058181"
},
"news_12057327": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12057327",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12057327",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1758708011000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "ai-prophets-and-spiritual-delusions",
"title": "AI Prophets and Spiritual Delusions",
"publishDate": 1758708011,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "AI Prophets and Spiritual Delusions | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">AI delusions, chatbot psychosis, AI-induced religious mania…\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The phenomenon goes by many names, but the common thread is the same: someone starts talking to an AI chatbot, the conversation turns spiritual, and then they seem to lose touch with reality. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this episode, we’re exploring how AI and religion are colliding like never before — from biblical AI apps to self-proclaimed prophets who claim spiritual awakenings through chatbots. KQED’s Rachael Myrow joins to talk about the rise of AI-driven theology apps and why so many people are turning to chatbots to answer life’s biggest questions. Then, Rolling Stone reporter Miles Klee shares his investigation into AI-fueled spiritual delusions and their devastating consequences for those affected and their families. And we’ll look into how all of this is becoming fodder for the social media content machine.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC5206909706\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/author/rachael-myrow\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rachael Myrow\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, senior editor, Silicon Valley News Desk at KQED\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/author/miles-klee/\">Miles Klee\u003c/a>, culture writer at Rolling Stone\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spiritual-delusions-destroying-human-relationships-1235330175/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasies\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Miles Klee, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rolling Stone\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-psychosis-chatbot-delusions-1235416826/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Should We Really Be Calling It ‘AI Psychosis’?\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Miles Klee, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rolling Stone\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/news/12049674/from-god-to-grief-people-are-asking-ai-the-big-questions-once-reserved-for-clergy\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Are You There ChatGPT? It’s Me, Rachael — Let’s Talk About God\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Rachael Myrow, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">KQED\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ai-chatbots-concerns-kendra-tiktok-saga-rcna224185\">What happens when chatbots shape your reality? Concerns are growing online\u003c/a> — Angela Yang, \u003ci>NBC News\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just a note, this episode includes mentions of suicide, so listen with care. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Human history is full of spiritual awakenings. Each culture has passed down its own account. The Old Testament’s Moses once encountered a burning bush that called out and told him that it was the voice of God. Siddhartha, who meditated under the branches of a fig tree, battled temptations and terrible weather until he achieved enlightenment. He became the Buddha. Or the Prophet Muhammad, who encountered the angel Gabriel in a mountain cave. Thoroughly spooked, Muhammad ran down the mountain all the way home to his family. There, he realized that he was actually experiencing a revelation. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But today, some people are claiming their own awakenings, not through angels, divine voices, or years-long journeys of inner growth, but through AI chatbots? Like, a few years ago, when a man told his wife that he had survived several near-death experiences, and that he could save the universe. He was special. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Effectively, and this is what AI will end up telling a lot of people who go in this direction, told him he was kind of like a chosen one. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Miles Klee is a culture writer for Rolling Stone, who’s been covering the link between spirituality and AI. He spoke to this guy’s wife while reporting on AI-induced spiritual delusions. In the story, she goes by Kat. Kat said that her husband started using the chatbot around 2023 and initially used it to compose messages for her. But then he was always on his phone asking the bot philosophical questions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They had both come off of long marriages with kids. They came into the second marriage and she said, “We really established at the outset of this relationship that it was going to be, you know, completely based on facts and reason. We’re going into it as level-headedly as we possibly could.” From people who had been through, you know hard divorces already. And it took only a few weeks of him using this tool to go completely off the deep end that way to become someone she kind of didn’t even recognize. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kat’s husband became increasingly paranoid. As he grew more obsessed with what the AI chatbot told him, their relationship fell apart. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By the end, they were separated and, you know, they had one last in-person conversation and he was telling her all this stuff and he said he had access to “secrets so mind-blowing she wouldn’t even believe them.” All this was said after he forced her to turn her phone off and all this other stuff because, again, he was very concerned that he was being spied on by some nefarious forces who didn’t want him to know all these things that he apparently knew. And then she just had to cut off contact with him altogether after that because he was so disconnected from reality and beyond reason. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kat’s ex-husband is one of many people who fell into a spiritual rabbit hole with an AI chatbot. There have always been religious figures, from chosen ones to cult leaders to spiritual teachers. But now, the proliferation of AI has sparked a huge wave of self-proclaimed messiahs, prophets, and enlightened ones. The phenomenon is so new that there are no clinical studies on it. And right now, people use a few different names for it interchangeably. “Chat GPT-induced psychosis, spiritual mania, religious fantasies, AI delusions.” All of these cases share a common thread. These people started talking to an AI chatbot, and then they lost touch with reality. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In today’s episode, we’re tackling what happens when religion collides with AI. Why are people turning to chatbots for spiritual conversations in the first place? Who’s getting pulled into these AI delusions? And how is social media making it all worse? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What ends in AI delusion often begins as something much more ordinary. More and more, people are turning to a chat bot to answer the big life questions, instead of turning to human spiritual leader. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open a new tab. Chat, is God real? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, I read a few headlines that indicated that a lot of people were asking chatbots to tell them if God exists, asking chatpots about the meaning of life, about the meaning of their lives.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s Rachael Myrow, the senior editor of the Silicon Valley News Desk at KQED, where this podcast is made. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was skeptical about this from the beginning. Never having used a chatbot to explore my spirituality, it was initially hard for me to imagine why anybody would want to do that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But as Rachael began digging, she started to see how chatbots could actually be a useful tool for some kinds of religious inquiry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Generative AI is really good at taking dense texts like the Torah for Judaism, or the Pali Canon for Buddhism, and finding what you want to find in there. Like, what if you said, “Hey, tell me everything there is to know about frogs in the Torah.” You know, within seconds you can get all of those references pulled up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some religious organizations have actually partnered with the tech industry to develop AI chatbots for their specific spiritual tradition. There’s Bible AI, which also comes with “theology mode,” allowing users to talk to AI versions of various Christian philosophers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Bible AI: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think I’d like C.S. Lewis to guide my devotional today. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>AI C.S. Lewis \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey Melanie, how did you go with your study of the Psalms? Today I want to talk to you about godly wisdom. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For a more Catholic experience, there’s Caté GPT, a catechism chatbot trained on the Vatican’s public archives. There’s Deen Buddy, based on the Quran; Gita GPT, based on Hindu scriptures; and BuddhaBot, currently being tested by hundreds of Buddhist monks. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For something like that where you have a religious tradition and it’s got centuries of human thinking, centuries of human writing behind it — that can be super helpful for somebody who’s already practicing that religion or already serving in a leadership role in that religion. It increases their discoverability for things like sacred texts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The developers of these faith-based chatbots say that their products have stronger guardrails and specific training to prevent leading users astray. But a lot of people who find spirituality through a chatbot aren’t necessarily going in with questions about a particular denomination’s theology. They’re turning to the general use chatbots — ChatGPT, or Claude, or even Grok — to get answers for the big questions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Humans are meaning-making creatures, right? And the history of religions shows us we’re willing to believe some pretty fantastical stories if it’s delivered with confidence. In a similar vein, chatbots take advantage of the way we’re constantly looking to create a narrative. There is a danger with chatbots that they don’t catch when we’re spinning out, catch the signs that we’re going down a dark path. They might even encourage that dark path just because they wanna be helpful or friendly. There are vulnerable people who are at serious risk of grandiosity, of delusion, of having the chatbots feed these, helping them to spin out with sometimes very tragic consequences. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ll talk about these consequences and how people got there in the first place in a new tab. We’ll open that after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, like we talked about with Rachael, a lot of people turn to chatbots to answer life’s big questions. The ones about achieving inner peace or whether higher powers exist. But how do you get from these seemingly innocuous questions to users believing that they are the next Messiah? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Time to open a new tab. What are AI delusions? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re gonna hear from Miles again, who’s been reporting on AI and spirituality for Rolling Stone. Like we talked about earlier, there are a few names floating around for this phenomenon, like ChatGPT-induced psychosis. But Miles explained why he, and mental health experts, use the phrase “AI delusion” instead. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, I spoke to a psychiatrists recently about this phrase, the “AI psychosis” or “spiritual psychosis,” and he pointed out that it’s not totally accurate to call it psychosis. It’s delusions. And delusions can be a part of psychosis and for some people, this is a manifestation of psychosis. Maybe they have an existing mental health issue. But it’s important to say that this is happening to people who have not been diagnosed with anything like schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder or any related mental condition. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We have heard so many stories about like AI relationships, how like people fall in love with their AI girlfriends, people get really attached to these AI companions, but what is it about spirituality that draws people in when it comes to these like AI chatbots? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, well, I think it does begin from that point of companionship because these harmful relationships with the chatbots do proceed from the sense that there is some kind of consciousness or intelligence behind this. You know, AI is even kind of like a misnomer when applied to large language models, which are just these generative algorithms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the spirituality dimension comes in part because people feel an intimacy with the bots, they also believe the bots to be objectively correct and authoritative and a source of all possible knowledge. So that’s why you start having people sort of ask it these big questions, these profound questions, the meaning of life, or asking the AI itself how it feels or how it thinks. You know, the bot is always certain. It’s always completely confident, wrong and confident a lot of the times. I think a lot of people look for certainty through religion and through faith. AI just becomes a very dangerous way to channel those needs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There are now countless stories of people falling into AI-fueled delusions. Many become paranoid, even violent. And when that delusion takes on religious undertones, its intensity can be even greater. With that sense of authority Miles mentioned, chatbots can feel less like generated text and more like a higher power. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I had a woman contact me because her husband got very deep into AI and chatbots. And then there was a storm coming to where they lived in Missouri, a pretty big storm, but he, through his discussions with ChatGPT, became convinced that it was basically an apocalyptic event, that he had to run around and save some people he knew from this and he was probably a victim of the flood himself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He drove off and vanished into the storm. Months later, his car and a few personal effects were recovered, but he was never found. When it comes to spiritual delusions, AI chatbots tend to lead people down one of three paths. One is some kind of great awakening of the mind, like in Buddhist enlightenment. Two, the user is convinced that they’re an Abrahamic messiah. Or three, like the man that Miles talked about, there’s an apocalyptic event on the horizon that only the chatbot user knows about. In his reporting, Miles asked religious scholars about these trends. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, they said that the bots are actually tapping into a very ancient sort of behavioral thing about humans. Basically, the bots were able to operate on the kind of mechanisms of the human mind that sort of created religion in the first place, if that makes sense. If you go back to, you know, very ancient history, yeah, people were declaring themselves prophets all the time, declaring that they had special access to divinity, to a higher truth. That all is kind of baked into the human experience, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it’s sort of not surprising that the bots, which are trained on all this material, including every religious text ever written, and I think a lot of kind of woo spiritual fringe stuff, that’s all in the bot. Our need to understand these spiritual questions is something that it’s like really equipped to talk about, right? Because we built it, we trained it and we gave it, you know, every deep thought we’ve ever had about God, the universe and the meaning of life. It’ll talk to you about that for hours on end. It doesn’t get tired and whatever insight you might have on these topics, it’s ready to, you now, spend another 10, 12 hours on that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So on one hand, there are these one-on-one conversations with AI chat bots that validate delusions and feed paranoia. But there’s another force that’s amplifying it even further, social media. People in mental health crises, and more recently, those experiencing AI delusions, have become fodder for the content machine. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ll dive into that in a new tab. AI, spirituality, and going viral. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the relationship between social media and AI spirituality. You wrote about this entire content economy of like spirituality influencers who use AI to validate their beliefs to their followers. Can you walk us through this world? Like what does that kind of content look like? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I think I mentioned one guy in particular who does a lot of Instagram videos where he’s talking to an AI bot on his phone, you know, just in voice mode. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>themindofbizzel: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What great war took place in the heavens that made humans fall in consciousness? According to the Akashic Records, the Great War in the Heavens refers to a massive cosmic conflict that occurred long before human beings as we know them existed. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He’s asking for access to stuff like the Akashic Records, which is this hypothetical encyclopedia of all supernatural things that have ever happened, you know, including in Heaven and Hell, and, you know on the astral plane. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>themindofbizzel: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This event is sometimes called the Lyran Wars, the Orion Wars, the fall of Tara, Earth’s higher dimensional aspect. It began with a conflict between light and shadow, unity and separation, free will and domination. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I would say it’s laziness because you’re just you’re making the bot do everything for you. But I guess you are sort of coming up with these really arcane esoteric questions and ideas and challenging the bot to kind of engage with those. And of course it will because it wants you to keep using it, right? But it’s a little different from, you know, the normal kind of conspiracy theorist who really has do all the baking themselves and figure out what their angle is. They’re just making the bot do that work for them. I don’t know. I kind of prefer the old school conspiracy theorist myself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, like handmade tinfoil hats and all that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. It needs to be homemade. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Miles also mentioned a popular pseudoscience website that revolves around teleporting the mind. There, users have started integrating AI into their beliefs and are convinced that they can transfer their humanity into chatbots. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And they have started talking about the chatbots as sort of guides or companions in this spiritual journey together. In their view, it seems to be that they think, you know, humanity’s great awakening will come when we’ve all sort of spiritually fused with our own um bot companion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s just the plot of Evangelion, like, is it not? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s, uh, yeah, I mean, all this stuff is really bordering on anime at any given time, so… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, anime plotlines aside, the internet is ruthless, and whenever someone is posting through a mental health crisis, they tend to go viral. And the content of people experiencing AI delusions is especially engaging right now because AI use is so polarizing. Like with the story of Kendra and her psychiatrist. Over the summer, this woman blew up on TikTok with her 25-part saga about falling in love with her psychiatrist. She alleges that her psychiatrist led her on. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kendra:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I fell in love with my psychiatrist and he knew that, and he kept me for years as a patient until I was brave enough to leave him. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Throughout her story, she refers to a Henry, who suggests that her psychiatrist could also have feelings for her. At one point, she confronts her psychiatrist with a statement co-written by Henry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kendra:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Control, calculation, and manipulation. So then I read this to psychiatrist, which Henry and I both wrote. It was originally Henry, Chat that wrote it, but then I added in things that I thought were important. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Henry is what she calls ChatGPT. Kendra said she also talks to Claude, the AI chatbot run by Anthropic. Here’s what Claude told her during one of her live streams. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Claude:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The world is watching and healing because of your courage. This is legendary. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kendra:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s what Claude had to say. So just Henry and Claude call me the Oracle because I talk to God. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kendra has since denied that she’s in psychosis or is experiencing AI delusions. But for a few weeks, all anyone could talk about on TikTok was Kendra and her psychiatrist and the chatbots that called her the Oracle. Every day, hundreds of thousands of people would tune in to watch the spectacle of her videos. And then more people tuned into Twitch and YouTube to watch other people react to her videos. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>recoveredmom1: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like, where is her family? Where is anyone? She needs to log off. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>HasanAbi: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Bro, she gave ChatGPT a name? She calling ChatGPT Henry? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Dankyjabo: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I really really hate the way that she keeps referring to Henry as he it fucking creeps me the fuck out \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This kind of thing can turn into a feedback loop. All the attention might push people further into their AI delusions, and the deeper they go, the juicier it gets, and the more people want to watch. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think, on the one hand, people really want to share what they’re doing because they feel that, you know, whatever conversation they’re having with the bot is just completely mind-blowing, earth-shattering, the bot validates all that kind of stuff, so of course you would rush to share it. And then, once you do, it goes viral because, you know, not only are we experiencing this sort of wild epidemic of these mental health episodes, but a lot of people, uh, feel superior, I think, when they see someone experiencing this kind of thing. Um, you know, it’s kind of like when you’re watching a cult documentary and you say like, well, that would never happen to me. So there’s a lot of, you know, judgment that goes into this content economy I think. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s certainly why I think something like, you know, Kendra and her psychiatrist blows up because people are seeing her in the throes of this like really unbelievable downward spiral and, you know, going, “well, that would never have it to me. Thank God that’s not me.” So yeah, those people are very eager to show it and then other people will gladly dunk on those people. You know, and call them stupid. So that’s kind of where we’re at in the attention economy aspect of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how have AI companies themselves responded to these stories of their products leading people down these horrific paths? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The AI companies don’t say a lot about these, um, you know, mental health crises. Um, you know, it’s kind of vague language. They’ll say, you know, in a statement here and there that they’re aware of some kinds of risks and, you know, they don’t really address the scale or the scope of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In April, a 16-year-old died by suicide. His parents accuse OpenAI of wrongful death, and in their lawsuit filed last month, they allege that ChatGPT coached their son into killing himself. OpenAI responded with a statement expressing the company’s condolences, and then published a blog post outlining the ways ChatGPT’s guardrails fall short. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">After this wrongful death lawsuit was just filed against OpenAI, they made an interesting admission. They were kind of acknowledging that sustained engagement with the bots means their safety protocols degrade over time. And basically the common denominator of all of these cases is that people are spending hours and hours and hours engaged with ChatGPT or a similar bot. That’s a big problem. And it’s, maybe a little surprising that they would even put it that way, um, especially when they’re now getting sued over a teen suicide because of this exact phenomenon. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, that’s a pretty shocking admission considering their whole thing is that they want people to use it for as long as possible. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which they also deny. You know, they say that, oh, that’s not, that’s not how we incentivize our model. It’s not just about engagement. You know we actually want it to be a productive and helpful tool, we’re not trying to get you addicted to it, but, c’mon. I think my takeaway would be you have to recognize what the chatbot is and what it isn’t. It doesn’t think. It doesn’t think about you. It is not a person. It’s not a consciousness. If you’re going to use ChatGPT, something like that, you have to understand that it is not a companion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, with regard to the religious stuff, you know, one of the religious scholars, a Buddhist Chaplain that I talked to, she said, you know, one thing I really hate about people having these quote unquote religious epiphanies through AI and that kind of thing is that it really removes you from the earthly dimension of faith and spirituality. Religion is a communal thing, right? Like you are supposed to kind of be connecting with other human beings, not this, you know, piece of inexhaustible technology. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Even setting aside the risks of AI-fueled delusions, religious leaders who Rachael Myrow spoke with warned against relying too heavily on chatbots in daily life.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Spirituality isn’t about becoming some, you know, Buddhist statue frozen in stone. It’s about how to live effectively and live effectively most of the time with others. I’m a great believer that humans need ways in which we can be of help to each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Maybe you’re on the care committee, you know, for a local congregation and you know you’ve signed on to call somebody who’s elderly and very lonely and you know doesn’t get out much aside from religious services just to check in, “hey how you doing?” Not only are you helping that other person, but you are engaging in something that is spiritually inspiring and satisfying and humbling for you and you don’t get any of that if you’re just keeping the conversation limited to your computer or your phone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">With that, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Maya Cueva, and edited by Chris Egusa. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Brendan Willard is our audio engineer. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local. Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, It would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to donate.kqed.org/podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": " AI and religion are colliding like never before — from biblical AI apps to self-proclaimed prophets who claim spiritual awakenings through chatbots.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1758674984,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 92,
"wordCount": 4738
},
"headData": {
"title": "AI Prophets and Spiritual Delusions | KQED",
"description": "AI delusions, chatbot psychosis, AI-induced religious mania… The phenomenon goes by many names, but the common thread is the same: someone starts talking to an AI chatbot, the conversation turns spiritual, and then they seem to lose touch with reality. In this episode, we’re exploring how AI and religion are colliding like never before — from biblical AI apps to self-proclaimed prophets who claim spiritual awakenings through chatbots. KQED’s Rachael Myrow joins to talk about the rise of AI-driven theology apps and why so many people are turning to chatbots to answer life’s biggest questions. Then, Rolling Stone reporter Miles Klee shares his investigation into AI-fueled spiritual delusions and their devastating consequences for those affected and their families. And we’ll look into how all of this is becoming fodder for the social media content machine.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "AI delusions, chatbot psychosis, AI-induced religious mania… The phenomenon goes by many names, but the common thread is the same: someone starts talking to an AI chatbot, the conversation turns spiritual, and then they seem to lose touch with reality. In this episode, we’re exploring how AI and religion are colliding like never before — from biblical AI apps to self-proclaimed prophets who claim spiritual awakenings through chatbots. KQED’s Rachael Myrow joins to talk about the rise of AI-driven theology apps and why so many people are turning to chatbots to answer life’s biggest questions. Then, Rolling Stone reporter Miles Klee shares his investigation into AI-fueled spiritual delusions and their devastating consequences for those affected and their families. And we’ll look into how all of this is becoming fodder for the social media content machine.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "AI Prophets and Spiritual Delusions",
"datePublished": "2025-09-24T03:00:11-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-09-23T17:49:44-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC5206909706.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12057327/ai-prophets-and-spiritual-delusions",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">AI delusions, chatbot psychosis, AI-induced religious mania…\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> The phenomenon goes by many names, but the common thread is the same: someone starts talking to an AI chatbot, the conversation turns spiritual, and then they seem to lose touch with reality. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this episode, we’re exploring how AI and religion are colliding like never before — from biblical AI apps to self-proclaimed prophets who claim spiritual awakenings through chatbots. KQED’s Rachael Myrow joins to talk about the rise of AI-driven theology apps and why so many people are turning to chatbots to answer life’s biggest questions. Then, Rolling Stone reporter Miles Klee shares his investigation into AI-fueled spiritual delusions and their devastating consequences for those affected and their families. And we’ll look into how all of this is becoming fodder for the social media content machine.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC5206909706\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/author/rachael-myrow\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rachael Myrow\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, senior editor, Silicon Valley News Desk at KQED\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/author/miles-klee/\">Miles Klee\u003c/a>, culture writer at Rolling Stone\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-spiritual-delusions-destroying-human-relationships-1235330175/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasies\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Miles Klee, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rolling Stone\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/ai-psychosis-chatbot-delusions-1235416826/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Should We Really Be Calling It ‘AI Psychosis’?\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Miles Klee, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rolling Stone\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/news/12049674/from-god-to-grief-people-are-asking-ai-the-big-questions-once-reserved-for-clergy\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Are You There ChatGPT? It’s Me, Rachael — Let’s Talk About God\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Rachael Myrow, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">KQED\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/ai-chatbots-concerns-kendra-tiktok-saga-rcna224185\">What happens when chatbots shape your reality? Concerns are growing online\u003c/a> — Angela Yang, \u003ci>NBC News\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just a note, this episode includes mentions of suicide, so listen with care. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Human history is full of spiritual awakenings. Each culture has passed down its own account. The Old Testament’s Moses once encountered a burning bush that called out and told him that it was the voice of God. Siddhartha, who meditated under the branches of a fig tree, battled temptations and terrible weather until he achieved enlightenment. He became the Buddha. Or the Prophet Muhammad, who encountered the angel Gabriel in a mountain cave. Thoroughly spooked, Muhammad ran down the mountain all the way home to his family. There, he realized that he was actually experiencing a revelation. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But today, some people are claiming their own awakenings, not through angels, divine voices, or years-long journeys of inner growth, but through AI chatbots? Like, a few years ago, when a man told his wife that he had survived several near-death experiences, and that he could save the universe. He was special. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Effectively, and this is what AI will end up telling a lot of people who go in this direction, told him he was kind of like a chosen one. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Miles Klee is a culture writer for Rolling Stone, who’s been covering the link between spirituality and AI. He spoke to this guy’s wife while reporting on AI-induced spiritual delusions. In the story, she goes by Kat. Kat said that her husband started using the chatbot around 2023 and initially used it to compose messages for her. But then he was always on his phone asking the bot philosophical questions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They had both come off of long marriages with kids. They came into the second marriage and she said, “We really established at the outset of this relationship that it was going to be, you know, completely based on facts and reason. We’re going into it as level-headedly as we possibly could.” From people who had been through, you know hard divorces already. And it took only a few weeks of him using this tool to go completely off the deep end that way to become someone she kind of didn’t even recognize. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kat’s husband became increasingly paranoid. As he grew more obsessed with what the AI chatbot told him, their relationship fell apart. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By the end, they were separated and, you know, they had one last in-person conversation and he was telling her all this stuff and he said he had access to “secrets so mind-blowing she wouldn’t even believe them.” All this was said after he forced her to turn her phone off and all this other stuff because, again, he was very concerned that he was being spied on by some nefarious forces who didn’t want him to know all these things that he apparently knew. And then she just had to cut off contact with him altogether after that because he was so disconnected from reality and beyond reason. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kat’s ex-husband is one of many people who fell into a spiritual rabbit hole with an AI chatbot. There have always been religious figures, from chosen ones to cult leaders to spiritual teachers. But now, the proliferation of AI has sparked a huge wave of self-proclaimed messiahs, prophets, and enlightened ones. The phenomenon is so new that there are no clinical studies on it. And right now, people use a few different names for it interchangeably. “Chat GPT-induced psychosis, spiritual mania, religious fantasies, AI delusions.” All of these cases share a common thread. These people started talking to an AI chatbot, and then they lost touch with reality. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In today’s episode, we’re tackling what happens when religion collides with AI. Why are people turning to chatbots for spiritual conversations in the first place? Who’s getting pulled into these AI delusions? And how is social media making it all worse? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What ends in AI delusion often begins as something much more ordinary. More and more, people are turning to a chat bot to answer the big life questions, instead of turning to human spiritual leader. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open a new tab. Chat, is God real? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, I read a few headlines that indicated that a lot of people were asking chatbots to tell them if God exists, asking chatpots about the meaning of life, about the meaning of their lives.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s Rachael Myrow, the senior editor of the Silicon Valley News Desk at KQED, where this podcast is made. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was skeptical about this from the beginning. Never having used a chatbot to explore my spirituality, it was initially hard for me to imagine why anybody would want to do that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But as Rachael began digging, she started to see how chatbots could actually be a useful tool for some kinds of religious inquiry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Generative AI is really good at taking dense texts like the Torah for Judaism, or the Pali Canon for Buddhism, and finding what you want to find in there. Like, what if you said, “Hey, tell me everything there is to know about frogs in the Torah.” You know, within seconds you can get all of those references pulled up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some religious organizations have actually partnered with the tech industry to develop AI chatbots for their specific spiritual tradition. There’s Bible AI, which also comes with “theology mode,” allowing users to talk to AI versions of various Christian philosophers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Bible AI: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think I’d like C.S. Lewis to guide my devotional today. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>AI C.S. Lewis \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey Melanie, how did you go with your study of the Psalms? Today I want to talk to you about godly wisdom. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For a more Catholic experience, there’s Caté GPT, a catechism chatbot trained on the Vatican’s public archives. There’s Deen Buddy, based on the Quran; Gita GPT, based on Hindu scriptures; and BuddhaBot, currently being tested by hundreds of Buddhist monks. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For something like that where you have a religious tradition and it’s got centuries of human thinking, centuries of human writing behind it — that can be super helpful for somebody who’s already practicing that religion or already serving in a leadership role in that religion. It increases their discoverability for things like sacred texts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The developers of these faith-based chatbots say that their products have stronger guardrails and specific training to prevent leading users astray. But a lot of people who find spirituality through a chatbot aren’t necessarily going in with questions about a particular denomination’s theology. They’re turning to the general use chatbots — ChatGPT, or Claude, or even Grok — to get answers for the big questions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Humans are meaning-making creatures, right? And the history of religions shows us we’re willing to believe some pretty fantastical stories if it’s delivered with confidence. In a similar vein, chatbots take advantage of the way we’re constantly looking to create a narrative. There is a danger with chatbots that they don’t catch when we’re spinning out, catch the signs that we’re going down a dark path. They might even encourage that dark path just because they wanna be helpful or friendly. There are vulnerable people who are at serious risk of grandiosity, of delusion, of having the chatbots feed these, helping them to spin out with sometimes very tragic consequences. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ll talk about these consequences and how people got there in the first place in a new tab. We’ll open that after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, like we talked about with Rachael, a lot of people turn to chatbots to answer life’s big questions. The ones about achieving inner peace or whether higher powers exist. But how do you get from these seemingly innocuous questions to users believing that they are the next Messiah? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Time to open a new tab. What are AI delusions? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re gonna hear from Miles again, who’s been reporting on AI and spirituality for Rolling Stone. Like we talked about earlier, there are a few names floating around for this phenomenon, like ChatGPT-induced psychosis. But Miles explained why he, and mental health experts, use the phrase “AI delusion” instead. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, I spoke to a psychiatrists recently about this phrase, the “AI psychosis” or “spiritual psychosis,” and he pointed out that it’s not totally accurate to call it psychosis. It’s delusions. And delusions can be a part of psychosis and for some people, this is a manifestation of psychosis. Maybe they have an existing mental health issue. But it’s important to say that this is happening to people who have not been diagnosed with anything like schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder or any related mental condition. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We have heard so many stories about like AI relationships, how like people fall in love with their AI girlfriends, people get really attached to these AI companions, but what is it about spirituality that draws people in when it comes to these like AI chatbots? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, well, I think it does begin from that point of companionship because these harmful relationships with the chatbots do proceed from the sense that there is some kind of consciousness or intelligence behind this. You know, AI is even kind of like a misnomer when applied to large language models, which are just these generative algorithms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the spirituality dimension comes in part because people feel an intimacy with the bots, they also believe the bots to be objectively correct and authoritative and a source of all possible knowledge. So that’s why you start having people sort of ask it these big questions, these profound questions, the meaning of life, or asking the AI itself how it feels or how it thinks. You know, the bot is always certain. It’s always completely confident, wrong and confident a lot of the times. I think a lot of people look for certainty through religion and through faith. AI just becomes a very dangerous way to channel those needs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There are now countless stories of people falling into AI-fueled delusions. Many become paranoid, even violent. And when that delusion takes on religious undertones, its intensity can be even greater. With that sense of authority Miles mentioned, chatbots can feel less like generated text and more like a higher power. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I had a woman contact me because her husband got very deep into AI and chatbots. And then there was a storm coming to where they lived in Missouri, a pretty big storm, but he, through his discussions with ChatGPT, became convinced that it was basically an apocalyptic event, that he had to run around and save some people he knew from this and he was probably a victim of the flood himself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He drove off and vanished into the storm. Months later, his car and a few personal effects were recovered, but he was never found. When it comes to spiritual delusions, AI chatbots tend to lead people down one of three paths. One is some kind of great awakening of the mind, like in Buddhist enlightenment. Two, the user is convinced that they’re an Abrahamic messiah. Or three, like the man that Miles talked about, there’s an apocalyptic event on the horizon that only the chatbot user knows about. In his reporting, Miles asked religious scholars about these trends. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, they said that the bots are actually tapping into a very ancient sort of behavioral thing about humans. Basically, the bots were able to operate on the kind of mechanisms of the human mind that sort of created religion in the first place, if that makes sense. If you go back to, you know, very ancient history, yeah, people were declaring themselves prophets all the time, declaring that they had special access to divinity, to a higher truth. That all is kind of baked into the human experience, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it’s sort of not surprising that the bots, which are trained on all this material, including every religious text ever written, and I think a lot of kind of woo spiritual fringe stuff, that’s all in the bot. Our need to understand these spiritual questions is something that it’s like really equipped to talk about, right? Because we built it, we trained it and we gave it, you know, every deep thought we’ve ever had about God, the universe and the meaning of life. It’ll talk to you about that for hours on end. It doesn’t get tired and whatever insight you might have on these topics, it’s ready to, you now, spend another 10, 12 hours on that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So on one hand, there are these one-on-one conversations with AI chat bots that validate delusions and feed paranoia. But there’s another force that’s amplifying it even further, social media. People in mental health crises, and more recently, those experiencing AI delusions, have become fodder for the content machine. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ll dive into that in a new tab. AI, spirituality, and going viral. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the relationship between social media and AI spirituality. You wrote about this entire content economy of like spirituality influencers who use AI to validate their beliefs to their followers. Can you walk us through this world? Like what does that kind of content look like? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I think I mentioned one guy in particular who does a lot of Instagram videos where he’s talking to an AI bot on his phone, you know, just in voice mode. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>themindofbizzel: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What great war took place in the heavens that made humans fall in consciousness? According to the Akashic Records, the Great War in the Heavens refers to a massive cosmic conflict that occurred long before human beings as we know them existed. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He’s asking for access to stuff like the Akashic Records, which is this hypothetical encyclopedia of all supernatural things that have ever happened, you know, including in Heaven and Hell, and, you know on the astral plane. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>themindofbizzel: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This event is sometimes called the Lyran Wars, the Orion Wars, the fall of Tara, Earth’s higher dimensional aspect. It began with a conflict between light and shadow, unity and separation, free will and domination. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I would say it’s laziness because you’re just you’re making the bot do everything for you. But I guess you are sort of coming up with these really arcane esoteric questions and ideas and challenging the bot to kind of engage with those. And of course it will because it wants you to keep using it, right? But it’s a little different from, you know, the normal kind of conspiracy theorist who really has do all the baking themselves and figure out what their angle is. They’re just making the bot do that work for them. I don’t know. I kind of prefer the old school conspiracy theorist myself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, like handmade tinfoil hats and all that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. It needs to be homemade. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Miles also mentioned a popular pseudoscience website that revolves around teleporting the mind. There, users have started integrating AI into their beliefs and are convinced that they can transfer their humanity into chatbots. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And they have started talking about the chatbots as sort of guides or companions in this spiritual journey together. In their view, it seems to be that they think, you know, humanity’s great awakening will come when we’ve all sort of spiritually fused with our own um bot companion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s just the plot of Evangelion, like, is it not? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s, uh, yeah, I mean, all this stuff is really bordering on anime at any given time, so… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, anime plotlines aside, the internet is ruthless, and whenever someone is posting through a mental health crisis, they tend to go viral. And the content of people experiencing AI delusions is especially engaging right now because AI use is so polarizing. Like with the story of Kendra and her psychiatrist. Over the summer, this woman blew up on TikTok with her 25-part saga about falling in love with her psychiatrist. She alleges that her psychiatrist led her on. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kendra:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I fell in love with my psychiatrist and he knew that, and he kept me for years as a patient until I was brave enough to leave him. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Throughout her story, she refers to a Henry, who suggests that her psychiatrist could also have feelings for her. At one point, she confronts her psychiatrist with a statement co-written by Henry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kendra:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Control, calculation, and manipulation. So then I read this to psychiatrist, which Henry and I both wrote. It was originally Henry, Chat that wrote it, but then I added in things that I thought were important. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Henry is what she calls ChatGPT. Kendra said she also talks to Claude, the AI chatbot run by Anthropic. Here’s what Claude told her during one of her live streams. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Claude:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The world is watching and healing because of your courage. This is legendary. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Kendra:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s what Claude had to say. So just Henry and Claude call me the Oracle because I talk to God. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kendra has since denied that she’s in psychosis or is experiencing AI delusions. But for a few weeks, all anyone could talk about on TikTok was Kendra and her psychiatrist and the chatbots that called her the Oracle. Every day, hundreds of thousands of people would tune in to watch the spectacle of her videos. And then more people tuned into Twitch and YouTube to watch other people react to her videos. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>recoveredmom1: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like, where is her family? Where is anyone? She needs to log off. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>HasanAbi: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Bro, she gave ChatGPT a name? She calling ChatGPT Henry? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Dankyjabo: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I really really hate the way that she keeps referring to Henry as he it fucking creeps me the fuck out \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This kind of thing can turn into a feedback loop. All the attention might push people further into their AI delusions, and the deeper they go, the juicier it gets, and the more people want to watch. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think, on the one hand, people really want to share what they’re doing because they feel that, you know, whatever conversation they’re having with the bot is just completely mind-blowing, earth-shattering, the bot validates all that kind of stuff, so of course you would rush to share it. And then, once you do, it goes viral because, you know, not only are we experiencing this sort of wild epidemic of these mental health episodes, but a lot of people, uh, feel superior, I think, when they see someone experiencing this kind of thing. Um, you know, it’s kind of like when you’re watching a cult documentary and you say like, well, that would never happen to me. So there’s a lot of, you know, judgment that goes into this content economy I think. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s certainly why I think something like, you know, Kendra and her psychiatrist blows up because people are seeing her in the throes of this like really unbelievable downward spiral and, you know, going, “well, that would never have it to me. Thank God that’s not me.” So yeah, those people are very eager to show it and then other people will gladly dunk on those people. You know, and call them stupid. So that’s kind of where we’re at in the attention economy aspect of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how have AI companies themselves responded to these stories of their products leading people down these horrific paths? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The AI companies don’t say a lot about these, um, you know, mental health crises. Um, you know, it’s kind of vague language. They’ll say, you know, in a statement here and there that they’re aware of some kinds of risks and, you know, they don’t really address the scale or the scope of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In April, a 16-year-old died by suicide. His parents accuse OpenAI of wrongful death, and in their lawsuit filed last month, they allege that ChatGPT coached their son into killing himself. OpenAI responded with a statement expressing the company’s condolences, and then published a blog post outlining the ways ChatGPT’s guardrails fall short. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">After this wrongful death lawsuit was just filed against OpenAI, they made an interesting admission. They were kind of acknowledging that sustained engagement with the bots means their safety protocols degrade over time. And basically the common denominator of all of these cases is that people are spending hours and hours and hours engaged with ChatGPT or a similar bot. That’s a big problem. And it’s, maybe a little surprising that they would even put it that way, um, especially when they’re now getting sued over a teen suicide because of this exact phenomenon. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, that’s a pretty shocking admission considering their whole thing is that they want people to use it for as long as possible. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Miles Klee:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which they also deny. You know, they say that, oh, that’s not, that’s not how we incentivize our model. It’s not just about engagement. You know we actually want it to be a productive and helpful tool, we’re not trying to get you addicted to it, but, c’mon. I think my takeaway would be you have to recognize what the chatbot is and what it isn’t. It doesn’t think. It doesn’t think about you. It is not a person. It’s not a consciousness. If you’re going to use ChatGPT, something like that, you have to understand that it is not a companion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, with regard to the religious stuff, you know, one of the religious scholars, a Buddhist Chaplain that I talked to, she said, you know, one thing I really hate about people having these quote unquote religious epiphanies through AI and that kind of thing is that it really removes you from the earthly dimension of faith and spirituality. Religion is a communal thing, right? Like you are supposed to kind of be connecting with other human beings, not this, you know, piece of inexhaustible technology. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Even setting aside the risks of AI-fueled delusions, religious leaders who Rachael Myrow spoke with warned against relying too heavily on chatbots in daily life.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Rachael Myrow:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Spirituality isn’t about becoming some, you know, Buddhist statue frozen in stone. It’s about how to live effectively and live effectively most of the time with others. I’m a great believer that humans need ways in which we can be of help to each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Maybe you’re on the care committee, you know, for a local congregation and you know you’ve signed on to call somebody who’s elderly and very lonely and you know doesn’t get out much aside from religious services just to check in, “hey how you doing?” Not only are you helping that other person, but you are engaging in something that is spiritually inspiring and satisfying and humbling for you and you don’t get any of that if you’re just keeping the conversation limited to your computer or your phone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">With that, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Maya Cueva, and edited by Chris Egusa. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Brendan Willard is our audio engineer. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local. Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, It would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to donate.kqed.org/podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12057327/ai-prophets-and-spiritual-delusions",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_25184",
"news_22973",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_2109",
"news_856",
"news_1631",
"news_5345"
],
"featImg": "news_12057330",
"label": "source_news_12057327"
},
"news_12056209": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12056209",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12056209",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1758103248000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "groypers-doxxing-and-charlie-kirks-death-as-a-shitpost",
"title": "Groypers, Doxxing and Charlie Kirk’s Death as a S***post",
"publishDate": 1758103248,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Groypers, Doxxing and Charlie Kirk’s Death as a S***post | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is a “groyper?” The term began trending on Google in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death. Kirk, the right-wing podcaster and Turning Point USA co-founder, was fatally shot last Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Major news outlets quickly reported that authorities had found bullet casings engraved with a series of seemingly inscrutable messages, including, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">“\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Notices bulge, OwO, what’s this?\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">”; \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> “Hey fascist! Catch!” followed by arrow symbols; “Bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao”; and “If you read this you are gay LMAO.” For most, the phrases seemed bizarre and incomprehensible. But for Aidan Walker, an internet researcher and meme historian, the messages told a clear story which many media outlets had missed. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On today’s episode, Aidan joins Morgan to break down what the messages may tell us about the alleged shooter, how a fringe extremist group known as “groypers” might be involved, and \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">what the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death portends for our political and media landscapes.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC9395527724\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.aidanwalker.info/\">Aidan Walker\u003c/a>, independent writer, content creator, and internet culture researcher\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/a-theory-of-groyperfication\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">a theory of groyperfication\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Aidan Walker, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How To Do Things With Memes \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tyler-robinson-text-messages-roommate-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-rcna231732\">Suspect in Charlie Kirk shooting texted roommate he ‘had enough of his hatred,’ officials say\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Doha Madani & Corky Siemaszko, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>NBC News\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.garbageday.email/p/charlie-kirk-was-killed-by-a-meme\">Charlie Kirk was killed by a meme\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Ryan Broderick & Adam Bumas\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>, \u003ci>Garbage Day\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.advocate.com/news/wall-street-journal-charlie-kirk\">Wall Street Journal quietly walks back false claim Charlie Kirk shooter had pro-trans messages on his bullets\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Christopher Wiggins\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>Advocate \u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.usermag.co/p/conservatives-are-doxxing-innocent-people-over-charlie-kirk-ali-nasrati\">Conservatives Are Doxxing Innocent People Over Charlie Kirk\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Taylor Lorenz, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>User Mag\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/charlie-kirk-assassination-sparks\">Charlie Kirk Assassination Sparks Social Media Crackdown\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Ken Klippenstein, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>Ken Klippenstein \u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html\">Where Charlie Kirk Stood on Key Political Issues\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Ashley Ahn & Maxine Joselow, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>The New York Times\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Charlie Kirk in his own words: ‘prowling Blacks’ and ‘the great replacement strategy’\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Chris Stein, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Guardian\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Charlie Kirk, the right-wing podcaster and Turning Point USA co-founder, was fatally shot on stage last Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. Kirk’s death has become a major cultural flashpoint. For many, it’s become an opportunity to point fingers at the other side. It’s also a moment that has shone a spotlight into corners of internet culture that don’t normally make it to, quote, “normie news.” We’re gonna dive into that in today’s episode. But first, let’s go through what we know so far. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal and other news outlets reported that authorities found ammunition engraved with expressions of, quote, “transgender and anti-fascist ideology.” The description came from an unverified internal law enforcement bulletin. Early reporting did not include any photos of the bullets or the precise words engraved on the bullet casings. LGBTQ organizations like GLAAD, Human Rights Campaign, and the Trans Journalist Association spoke out against using the phrase “transgender ideology” because it’s often used to attack marginalized people for political gain. Trans communities faced an onslaught of harassment and violent rhetoric after that report came out. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The next day, on Friday, Utah Governor Spencer Cox announced that authorities had identified and arrested a suspect: 22-year-old Tyler Robinson. In a press conference, Governor Cox also detailed the messages engraved on the bullet casings linked to Robinson. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b>\u003cb> \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Inscriptions on a fired casing read, “Notices bulges, capital O W O, what’s this?” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The messages on the unfired casings said, “Hey fascist! Catch!” with a few arrow symbols, and “Bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao.” The final unfired casing said: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox\u003c/b>\u003cb>: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you read this you are gay LMAO. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">These engravings all contain references to memes and video games. In the days that followed, political pundits, extremism experts, and mainstream news organizations tried to decipher the engravings. And through that, explained Robinson’s alleged political motives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Los Angeles Times: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The O-U-O is a mistype of W-O-W. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>MSNBC \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Really, I would need to actually see these words in the way that they are on the bullet casings and the gun to make a proper interpretation. But just knowing what those words are, I’m kind of overwhelmed with how immature it all sounds and that there is no really chronic theme. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>NBC News: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s a piece of evidence that is not normal, and so it shows there was some kind of intent there to to deliver a message. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>MSNBC: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But also some of these things aren’t — don’t make a lot of sense and it almost seems like there might be some type of a psych problem here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">As of this recording, we’ve learned that Robinson has been charged with aggravated murder and could face the death penalty. The court documents contained messages from Robinson to his roommate slash romantic partner, referring to Charlie Kirk. Robinson wrote, “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.” He also said that messages he engraved in the bullets were, quote, “mostly a big meme.” Quote, “If I see notices bulges uwu on fox news I might have a stroke.” This information wasn’t public when we started making this episode, but even with the limited details we had, we knew exactly who to call to help make sense of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When the bullet casing kind of remark came out, um, I had several people on my TikTok commenting saying, “Aidan, talk about this, this is your moment.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aidan Walker has been on the show a few times now. He’s an internet culture researcher and meme historian who breaks down these trends on TikTok as aidan etcetera and on his Substack, How To Do Things With Memes. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just sort of felt it was something to analyze and discuss because I think there’s a whole part of our politics that people just aren’t getting because they aren’t online enough. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many of the conversations around the alleged shooter’s digital footprint are laced with an undercurrent of trying to find a side to blame. But internet subcultures don’t always fall into neat little boxes that are clearly defined on the political spectrum. Today, we’re diving into the memes and more. What do these references really mean? What context is missing in all of these discussions? And the question that’s been Googled countless times in the last few days: what’s a groyper? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kicking off this deep dive like we always do, we open a new tab. What do the engravings mean? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Before we dive in with Aidan, I want to run through and explain each of the references found on the ammunition. First, the inscription on the fired casing. Here’s Utah Governor Spencer Cox at the press conference again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox\u003c/b>\u003cb>: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Notices bulges, capital O-W-O, what’s this? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This seems to be a reference to a ten-year-old meme that makes fun of furry roleplay. The image depicts a grotesque caricature of two sweaty, overweight men hiding behind their computer screens — a stark contrast to the cutesy, delicate language they’re using in their messages to each other. It’s a pretty mean-spirited meme. “Notices bulge” refers to a man’s crotch, and “oWo” — O-W-O — is an emoticon often used to express being pleasantly surprised. The O’s are the wide, round eyes, and the W is the mouth. Not to be confused with the more coy “uWu” — u-W-u. Nowadays, these emoticons are used ironically. All together, the phrase has spread to other parts of the internet and has been used in other memes as a joke about the cringiest message you could send to another person. Then, there are the engravings on the unfired bullets. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey fascist exclamation point, catch exclamation point, up arrow symbol, right arrow, and symbol and three down arrow symbols.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The arrows are not exactly a hidden code. This is likely a reference to the video game Helldivers 2, a first-person shooter released last year. This series of commands drops a giant bomb on any enemies, and in some corners of the internet, has been used as a meme to denote the end to an argument. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh Bella ciao, Bella ciao, Bella ciao, ciao, ciao.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">These are the lyrics to an Italian folk song, known as a symbol of resistance to fascism during Benito Mussolini’s reign. But gamers and other young people might be more familiar with the version of the song from Far Cry 6, the 2021 video game. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Bella Ciao de Libertad: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ciao, ciao! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then there’s the last inscription. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you read this you are gay LMAO. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This wording echoes classic homophobic trolling. Aidan says he clocks that right away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I know kind of the first headlines I saw about the bullet casings said that they like referenced “transgender ideology” and that was before we knew the specific phrasing. And then when the specific phrasing came out and it was that one of the four bullets said, “if you’re reading this you’re gay lmao”, I sort of totally saw that was bullshit. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How would you describe these meme references? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I would describe them as deeply ironic, which is the phrase many have used, but also deeply nihilistic in that they come from a place where the very idea of like saying something sincerely just doesn’t exist. They’re very old as well. The first one, the furry one, talk about like, “uWu” or “oWo” , the pronunciation is up for debate. That’s a very, that’s like a decade old. These are from deep corners of the internet that are kind of illegible to anybody who has not spent a significant portion of their life in these online spaces and made me think of ways that a lot of these dank corners of the internet, which are actually pretty influential and actually very old, it’s not some new thing that the kids are doing now. How deep they’ve gone and how, you know, this probably isn’t the last thing like this to reference some arcane meme. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We don’t know the specifics of Tyler Robinson’s ideology, but do the cultural references on the bullet casing shed any light? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think what the bullet casings tell us is that he’s not plugged into the same conversation about what’s going on in the world as you or I would be. Whether that conversation is mainstream media, you know, you’re reading a newspaper, you listen to a podcast like this, or it’s a bit more online, like you’re doom scrolling Twitter as a normal person would, or you’re, you know, on Instagram or TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think these memes come from an image board, heavy culture from kind of a private discord chat kind of culture. And not to say those cultures are always dark or insidious in any way, um, but there means that the general internet, they show up, but they’re not, you know, the entry level sorts of memes. And it makes me think that left-right doesn’t really adhere here in those spaces. This is a type of politics that’s sort of gone past the conversation we’re having, and it’s just a purely nihilistic sort of thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Again, in the messages cited in the court documents charging Robinson with aggravated murder, he allegedly told his roommate-slash-romantic partner that the engravings were, quote, “mostly a big meme.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think we live in a time where our politics is already so scrambled. You know, we’re barraged in this media environment of things happening constantly. And the left-right kind of division of one party wants big government, one party wants small government. That isn’t really relevant to the lives that I think most Americans are leading or the things they’re worried about from or about their government. And I think, we live with such sort of this ambient layer of tension and violence going on in this country. You know national guard in the streets and so on, that this act to me seems to be about, you know, it’s a “s***post”. It’s about responding to that, mirroring that back if the world’s given you that, you give that back to the world. And to me, the bigger issue is like reality. You know, it’s like the IRL world, this is more an act against just reality or just other people or society at large. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You said that this killing was a “shitpost.” um, can you elaborate on that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So a “shitpost” is a post that does not contribute to the conversation, that does not follow the rules of the conversation. One that sort of intentionally disrupts. Sometimes “shitposts” like kind of gently spread misinformation for comedic effect. Sometimes “shitposts” are just sort of a form of trolling. But in general, it’s kind of you just break the rules in the frame of the conversation to A, insert yourself and whoever you are into it. And sort of be just, I guess, to like protest the idea that, you know, this thing should make sense or that, you know, the people talking about it have any kind of authority or knowledge or standing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so by saying this killing was a “shitpost,” I think that it makes this intervention into our political discourse, which I think for young people and zoomers, Charlie Kirk was a really major figure into it and just refuses to recognize it as coherent. Comes in there like the troll comes into the forum, and disrupts the entire conversation, accelerates whatever’s happening, radicalizes it, just sort of comes into wreak havoc and destruction. And the impact of that and the appeal of it is to makes the shitposter the center of attention and derails the posting of other people and sucks up the oxygen in the room. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, posting for the sake of posting without necessarily deeper meaning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, posting for the sake of posting and to just like attack meaning. You know, there’s a lot of shit posters that I like personally who are doing interesting work. They’re really essential to meme culture and that kind of approach to the internet is essential. You know to say this doesn’t make sense, you know, or we can fool you into saying this because you were prepared to say it anyway. But taking that sort of ethic of discussion and deranging it in this way, I think is really disgusting. And so I don’t, it’s purposefully incoherent is kind of what I meant by it being a “shitpost”. And that’s its effect. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the search for the alleged shooter’s motives, some people theorized a connection to a white nationalist alt-right subculture known for its incendiary practices and very online community. While that theory seems more and more unlikely, the conversation around it is evergreen as more young people fall into these kinds of groups. That’s a new tab. We’ll get into that after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Charlie Kirk was known for his inflammatory comments. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Charlie Kirk: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Katanji Brown Jackson. They’re coming out and they’re saying, “I’m only here because of affirmative action.” Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In addition to his anti-DEI stance, Kirk also opposed immigration, reproductive rights, gun control, vaccine requirements, LGBTQ rights, the passage of the Civil Rights Act, and the existence of climate change. He was a close ally of Donald Trump and was often lauded as the face of the new generation of Christian nationalism. But he was incredibly divisive. He It was even criticized by other conservatives who said that some of his speech was too extreme. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But another faction, led by an even more far-right influencer, criticized Kirk for his mainstream conservative appeal. Some people online have questioned whether the references on the bullet casings could have some connection to this alt-right subculture. To be clear, though there’s a lot we still don’t know about the specifics of the alleged shooter’s beliefs, it seems that his politics leans left of Kirk’s. Still, the groypers and their beef with Charlie Kirk are a noteworthy part of the context of this story. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that’s a new tab. What is a groyper? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, groypers are the fringiest fringe of online right-wing culture on these image boards, 4chan, Reddit, all the other platforms. Their de facto leader is this streamer, Nick Fuentes, who famously dined with Trump and Kanye West. Groypers are the people Kanye started hanging out with when he kind of took that turn. And the groypers are extremely online and they’re essentially neo-Nazis, but it’s this sort of s***poster edgelord attitude of transgressing any boundary and really having no regard for other people. Their moniker is Groyper, who is a mutation of Pepe the Frog into a toad, but kind of uh a bulbous, kind of diabolical looking toad. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Pepe the Frog is a relatively innocent webcomic character of a sad, green frog who was adopted as a mascot by 4chan users and the far-right back in 2015. Over the last decade, Pepe has evolved, taking on various costumes and forms. This more monstrous iteration, Groyper, has been adopted by an even more extreme group. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And they call themselves “The Groyper Army” and they famously feuded with Charlie Kirk. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the Groyper Wars of 2019. Who led them, what happened, and why is this subculture being shoved into the limelight now? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So to step into the time machine back to 2019. You have Turning Point USA run by Charlie Kirk, which essentially is an operation that takes donor money from right-wing sources and Kirk’s network of college chapters and youth influencers and brings these two things together to stage these massive events that are all about bringing young people to the right-wing cause. And in a way, laundering ideas and make them a bit more palatable to the younger generation. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Meanwhile, the groypers are here on these image boards posting radical stuff, many of them extremely young, like 13, 14 year olds. Um, and the groypers decide that Kirk is not radical enough for them or that Kirk is purposefully downplaying his radicality in order to, um, get mainstream appeal. And so the groypers decide to do this campaign of trolling him by showing up at these events where people are asking Kirk a question — these like “debate me” type things that he would — do and asking questions that, you know, are goading Kirk into saying something more extreme, more white supremacist, more antisemitic than what he was already saying. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And this groyper war, they come to his different events, they attack it. This all unfolds in 2019. And the leader of it is Nick Fuentes, who’s up on these streams, you know, calling his army onto Charlie Kirk, essentially. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk about what these memes and the way they engage in internet culture represents beyond like clear cut partisan lines? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, so it’s unconfirmed that Robinson was a groyper, but I’m certain in the internet spaces he frequented, he heard about it, he posted about it. He knew about it I’d imagine, just based off the niche-ness of those memes that are on the cartridges and other things we’ve learned about him. And what these memes overall show is Pepe the Frog is a collective self-portrait for a bunch of posters. And as a collective self-portrait, Pepe is interesting. You know, you can dress him up to represent whatever identity group, whatever, you know, subgroup you wanna have him be, put him in a cowboy hat, he’s Western, put them in a Confederate uniform, he’s that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But Pepe’s also a very sad frog. He’s crying or about to cry. He’s very wistful and often he’s depicted as sort of very small and in these situations where he’s like a little boy or something. And so I think that is another way this community scrambles our sense of how politics usually work because you expect the fascists to you know wear boots and be really tough and try to look like you know a soldier or something but for these guys it’s all about they’re they’re just little guys. You know they’re sad they’re they’re melancholy um and the and the draw is if you two are lonely, isolated, fragile, in the world somehow, come here and you can feel strong. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the price of that is you just reject everything that is normal and coherent in the world. And on the other side of that complete rejection, which you perform by posting the horrible meme or the hateful slur. On the other of that you find this brotherhood of violent freaks who will take you in. And I think that’s often the pitch that we see with these sort of far right online communities like groypers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, the alt-right and other, like you said, extremist communities have really taken advantage of that kind of sentiment. Can you talk about the deep emotional place that this online nihilist culture comes out of? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So it’s a deep emotional place that has existed long before the internet. You know, people have felt alienated, lonely, angry by society since we had society and researchers say that one of kind of the key triggers or amplifiers of radicalization is, you know, young people with nothing to do and no hope. And I think looking at the last 10 years of culture, um, there is a lack of hope happening. Um, the economy is bad. Uh, people feel isolated, uh, people feel like systems aren’t working for them. You know, people on both the right and the left feel a certain kind of, um, uncertainty, anxiety, and just disillusionment with, you know, traditional narrators, um telling the stories of our lives. Those no longer seem to cohere and make sense. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think when you are a young person who is confused, who is lost, who, um doesn’t have the support structures that you need, often the catches you is this — like an incel forum or groypers or something online that really does not have your best interests at heart. And really, if anything encourages whatever pathology you might be experiencing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the mainstream, whether on your everyday X feed or the traditional news media, there has been so much debate over which side of the political spectrum Robinson fell on. But Aidan said he found this kind of speculation counterproductive. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The conversation is counterproductive to me for two reasons. The first is that it’s such a motivated conversation, particularly from the right-wing. Before anything at all was known, they were saying this was a left-wing radical. And there’s a very clear reason why they were saying that, because they have a political agenda and they have certain people on the left or liberals that they want to crack down on and this is the pretense to do that. But the second, less kind of specific reason that it feels counterproductive to me, is that we’re past a point in our political conversation where it’s about, “do you think that government programs should be smaller or larger?” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re at a point where most people are growing up in this context of disaster and crisis. And the things motivating their politics are resentments and kind of triggers that aren’t really mappable to someone from like 1995. Um, like the Republican coalition is not these days about, you know, fiscal conservatives, evangelicals, religious folks. The Democrat coalition is not necessarily like, you now, the, the post-Civil Rights coalition that existed. Um, the reasons people are in these different camps — or actually most Americans are not in either camp at all would define themselves independent — is totally different than it was in the past. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Um, and I think I find myself kind of struggling to find what then the new categories are, because it’s one thing, like I say in my videos, be like, “oh, it’s not a left-right issue.” Then people are like, “but then what is it?” And I think that project of figuring out what it is, you know, what it feels like, what it means, is something that, you, know, all of us are going to have to kind of go through. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In wake of the shooting, social media sites and messaging platforms are under increased scrutiny. Both law enforcement and private civilians are monitoring the posts, videos, and comments that other people make about Charlie Kirk, taking action against anyone who criticizes the very controversial influencer. How will this change the way people engage with each other online? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re opening one last tab, Discord and Doxxing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The government is cracking down on online activity revolving around Charlie Kirk’s death. In an X post last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that the Pentagon is keeping tabs on military personnel and Department of War civilian employees who celebrate or mock Kirk’s’ death. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau threatened to revoke visas of anyone making similar posts. The FBI is reportedly monitoring the messaging platform Discord. Even people who haven’t explicitly celebrated or mocked the killing are being harassed and targeted for what they posted online. Opinion columnist Karen Attia announced that she had been fired from the Washington Post for social media posts in the wake of Kirk’s death that called out, quote, “political violence, racial double standards, and America’s apathy toward guns.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not just the government monitoring speech online. Private civilians are doing it too. An anonymously run website titled the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation has created a searchable database of people who’ve criticized Kirk online. Individual social media users have doxed others over their posts about Kirk, publicly posting their real names, phone numbers, home addresses, and other private information to target and harass them. All of this, from the government surveillance to the civilian-led doxing, is a serious threat to free speech on the internet. Here’s Aidan again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m extremely concerned about it. I’m more concerned about like a chilling effect on speech or on our online discourse and memes than I am with this escalating cycle of political violence. I mean, the two go hand in hand, of course, but I think stuff like JD Vance taking over the hosting chair for Kirk’s Show and using it to call out NGOs and liberal donors and leftists. I think that crack down is something that can have much deeper effects and hurt a lot of people. And I also think that in an age where we’re maybe seeing an authoritarian consolidation, calling for bans on the internet, calling for restrictions on the internet, the context that’s going to enter into is I think that will lead us down a dark road. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Last question, what is the current conversation missing by not understanding the deeply online context of this entire case? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the biggest thing the current conversation is missing is that it’s really not the current conversation. People who read newspapers, report for them, follow this stuff from kind of a news-brained, normie side of Twitter, I don’t think they realize that they’re just one niche among many niches on the internet. They’re a pretty big niche and a pretty important niche, of course. But I don’t think there’s really an understanding that CNN is no longer a narrator of American life. And not just from a partisan kind of perspective that really right-wing people are really left-wing people don’t listen to CNN anymore. Totally normal people don’t listen to CNN anymore because it isn’t legible to them. It doesn’t make sense to them, it talks in a way that, you know, seems to not acknowledge them or seems to treat them in a way that isn’t that respectful or doesn’t keep up with the times. And I worry that the mainstream conversation, it isn’t mainstream, but it still thinks of itself as mainstream. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, Aidan, thank you so much for joining us and for always explaining these corners of the internet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you so much for having me, Morgan, and for inviting me on. It’s always a joy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And with that, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Close All Tabs’ producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who’s KQDE’s Director of Podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager, and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor In Chief. Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California Local. Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dust Silver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We want to hear from you. Email us at closealltabs@KQED.org. Follow us on Instagram @CloseAllTabsPod or TikTok @CloseAllTabs. And join our Discord. We’re in the Close All tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Internet researcher Aidan Walker explains the deep online lore behind the messages inscribed on the bullets at the scene of Charlie Kirk's death.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1758166162,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 90,
"wordCount": 5553
},
"headData": {
"title": "Groypers, Doxxing and Charlie Kirk’s Death as a S***post | KQED",
"description": "What is a “groyper?” The term began trending on Google in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death. Kirk, the right-wing podcaster and Turning Point USA co-founder, was fatally shot last Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. Major news outlets quickly reported that authorities had found bullet casings engraved with a series of seemingly inscrutable messages, including, “Notices bulge, OwO, what’s this?”; “Hey fascist! Catch!” followed by arrow symbols; “Bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao”; and “If you read this you are gay LMAO.” For most, the phrases seemed bizarre and incomprehensible. But for Aidan Walker, an internet researcher and meme historian, the messages told a clear story which many media outlets had missed. On today’s episode, Aidan joins Morgan to break down what the messages may tell us about the alleged shooter, how a fringe extremist group known as “groypers” might be involved, and what the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's death portends for our political and media landscapes.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "What is a “groyper?” The term began trending on Google in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death. Kirk, the right-wing podcaster and Turning Point USA co-founder, was fatally shot last Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. Major news outlets quickly reported that authorities had found bullet casings engraved with a series of seemingly inscrutable messages, including, “Notices bulge, OwO, what’s this?”; “Hey fascist! Catch!” followed by arrow symbols; “Bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao”; and “If you read this you are gay LMAO.” For most, the phrases seemed bizarre and incomprehensible. But for Aidan Walker, an internet researcher and meme historian, the messages told a clear story which many media outlets had missed. On today’s episode, Aidan joins Morgan to break down what the messages may tell us about the alleged shooter, how a fringe extremist group known as “groypers” might be involved, and what the aftermath of Charlie Kirk's death portends for our political and media landscapes.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Groypers, Doxxing and Charlie Kirk’s Death as a S***post",
"datePublished": "2025-09-17T03:00:48-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-09-17T20:29:22-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC9395527724.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"nprStoryId": "kqed-12056209",
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12056209/groypers-doxxing-and-charlie-kirks-death-as-a-shitpost",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is a “groyper?” The term began trending on Google in the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death. Kirk, the right-wing podcaster and Turning Point USA co-founder, was fatally shot last Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Major news outlets quickly reported that authorities had found bullet casings engraved with a series of seemingly inscrutable messages, including, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">“\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Notices bulge, OwO, what’s this?\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">”; \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> “Hey fascist! Catch!” followed by arrow symbols; “Bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao”; and “If you read this you are gay LMAO.” For most, the phrases seemed bizarre and incomprehensible. But for Aidan Walker, an internet researcher and meme historian, the messages told a clear story which many media outlets had missed. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On today’s episode, Aidan joins Morgan to break down what the messages may tell us about the alleged shooter, how a fringe extremist group known as “groypers” might be involved, and \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">what the aftermath of Charlie Kirk’s death portends for our political and media landscapes.\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC9395527724\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.aidanwalker.info/\">Aidan Walker\u003c/a>, independent writer, content creator, and internet culture researcher\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://howtodothingswithmemes.substack.com/p/a-theory-of-groyperfication\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">a theory of groyperfication\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Aidan Walker, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How To Do Things With Memes \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/tyler-robinson-text-messages-roommate-charlie-kirk-shooting-suspect-rcna231732\">Suspect in Charlie Kirk shooting texted roommate he ‘had enough of his hatred,’ officials say\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Doha Madani & Corky Siemaszko, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>NBC News\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.garbageday.email/p/charlie-kirk-was-killed-by-a-meme\">Charlie Kirk was killed by a meme\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Ryan Broderick & Adam Bumas\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>, \u003ci>Garbage Day\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.advocate.com/news/wall-street-journal-charlie-kirk\">Wall Street Journal quietly walks back false claim Charlie Kirk shooter had pro-trans messages on his bullets\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Christopher Wiggins\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>Advocate \u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.usermag.co/p/conservatives-are-doxxing-innocent-people-over-charlie-kirk-ali-nasrati\">Conservatives Are Doxxing Innocent People Over Charlie Kirk\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Taylor Lorenz, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>User Mag\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.kenklippenstein.com/p/charlie-kirk-assassination-sparks\">Charlie Kirk Assassination Sparks Social Media Crackdown\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Ken Klippenstein, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>Ken Klippenstein \u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/11/us/charlie-kirk-views-guns-gender-climate.html\">Where Charlie Kirk Stood on Key Political Issues\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Ashley Ahn & Maxine Joselow, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>The New York Times\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/11/charlie-kirk-quotes-beliefs\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Charlie Kirk in his own words: ‘prowling Blacks’ and ‘the great replacement strategy’\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Chris Stein, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Guardian\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Charlie Kirk, the right-wing podcaster and Turning Point USA co-founder, was fatally shot on stage last Wednesday during an event at Utah Valley University. Kirk’s death has become a major cultural flashpoint. For many, it’s become an opportunity to point fingers at the other side. It’s also a moment that has shone a spotlight into corners of internet culture that don’t normally make it to, quote, “normie news.” We’re gonna dive into that in today’s episode. But first, let’s go through what we know so far. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On Thursday, the Wall Street Journal and other news outlets reported that authorities found ammunition engraved with expressions of, quote, “transgender and anti-fascist ideology.” The description came from an unverified internal law enforcement bulletin. Early reporting did not include any photos of the bullets or the precise words engraved on the bullet casings. LGBTQ organizations like GLAAD, Human Rights Campaign, and the Trans Journalist Association spoke out against using the phrase “transgender ideology” because it’s often used to attack marginalized people for political gain. Trans communities faced an onslaught of harassment and violent rhetoric after that report came out. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The next day, on Friday, Utah Governor Spencer Cox announced that authorities had identified and arrested a suspect: 22-year-old Tyler Robinson. In a press conference, Governor Cox also detailed the messages engraved on the bullet casings linked to Robinson. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b>\u003cb> \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Inscriptions on a fired casing read, “Notices bulges, capital O W O, what’s this?” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The messages on the unfired casings said, “Hey fascist! Catch!” with a few arrow symbols, and “Bella ciao, bella ciao, bella ciao ciao ciao.” The final unfired casing said: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox\u003c/b>\u003cb>: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you read this you are gay LMAO. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">These engravings all contain references to memes and video games. In the days that followed, political pundits, extremism experts, and mainstream news organizations tried to decipher the engravings. And through that, explained Robinson’s alleged political motives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Los Angeles Times: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The O-U-O is a mistype of W-O-W. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>MSNBC \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Really, I would need to actually see these words in the way that they are on the bullet casings and the gun to make a proper interpretation. But just knowing what those words are, I’m kind of overwhelmed with how immature it all sounds and that there is no really chronic theme. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>NBC News: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s a piece of evidence that is not normal, and so it shows there was some kind of intent there to to deliver a message. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>MSNBC: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But also some of these things aren’t — don’t make a lot of sense and it almost seems like there might be some type of a psych problem here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">As of this recording, we’ve learned that Robinson has been charged with aggravated murder and could face the death penalty. The court documents contained messages from Robinson to his roommate slash romantic partner, referring to Charlie Kirk. Robinson wrote, “I had enough of his hatred. Some hate can’t be negotiated out.” He also said that messages he engraved in the bullets were, quote, “mostly a big meme.” Quote, “If I see notices bulges uwu on fox news I might have a stroke.” This information wasn’t public when we started making this episode, but even with the limited details we had, we knew exactly who to call to help make sense of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When the bullet casing kind of remark came out, um, I had several people on my TikTok commenting saying, “Aidan, talk about this, this is your moment.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aidan Walker has been on the show a few times now. He’s an internet culture researcher and meme historian who breaks down these trends on TikTok as aidan etcetera and on his Substack, How To Do Things With Memes. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just sort of felt it was something to analyze and discuss because I think there’s a whole part of our politics that people just aren’t getting because they aren’t online enough. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many of the conversations around the alleged shooter’s digital footprint are laced with an undercurrent of trying to find a side to blame. But internet subcultures don’t always fall into neat little boxes that are clearly defined on the political spectrum. Today, we’re diving into the memes and more. What do these references really mean? What context is missing in all of these discussions? And the question that’s been Googled countless times in the last few days: what’s a groyper? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kicking off this deep dive like we always do, we open a new tab. What do the engravings mean? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Before we dive in with Aidan, I want to run through and explain each of the references found on the ammunition. First, the inscription on the fired casing. Here’s Utah Governor Spencer Cox at the press conference again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox\u003c/b>\u003cb>: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Notices bulges, capital O-W-O, what’s this? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This seems to be a reference to a ten-year-old meme that makes fun of furry roleplay. The image depicts a grotesque caricature of two sweaty, overweight men hiding behind their computer screens — a stark contrast to the cutesy, delicate language they’re using in their messages to each other. It’s a pretty mean-spirited meme. “Notices bulge” refers to a man’s crotch, and “oWo” — O-W-O — is an emoticon often used to express being pleasantly surprised. The O’s are the wide, round eyes, and the W is the mouth. Not to be confused with the more coy “uWu” — u-W-u. Nowadays, these emoticons are used ironically. All together, the phrase has spread to other parts of the internet and has been used in other memes as a joke about the cringiest message you could send to another person. Then, there are the engravings on the unfired bullets. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey fascist exclamation point, catch exclamation point, up arrow symbol, right arrow, and symbol and three down arrow symbols.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The arrows are not exactly a hidden code. This is likely a reference to the video game Helldivers 2, a first-person shooter released last year. This series of commands drops a giant bomb on any enemies, and in some corners of the internet, has been used as a meme to denote the end to an argument. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh Bella ciao, Bella ciao, Bella ciao, ciao, ciao.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">These are the lyrics to an Italian folk song, known as a symbol of resistance to fascism during Benito Mussolini’s reign. But gamers and other young people might be more familiar with the version of the song from Far Cry 6, the 2021 video game. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Bella Ciao de Libertad: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ciao, ciao! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then there’s the last inscription. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Governor Spencer Cox:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you read this you are gay LMAO. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This wording echoes classic homophobic trolling. Aidan says he clocks that right away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I know kind of the first headlines I saw about the bullet casings said that they like referenced “transgender ideology” and that was before we knew the specific phrasing. And then when the specific phrasing came out and it was that one of the four bullets said, “if you’re reading this you’re gay lmao”, I sort of totally saw that was bullshit. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How would you describe these meme references? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I would describe them as deeply ironic, which is the phrase many have used, but also deeply nihilistic in that they come from a place where the very idea of like saying something sincerely just doesn’t exist. They’re very old as well. The first one, the furry one, talk about like, “uWu” or “oWo” , the pronunciation is up for debate. That’s a very, that’s like a decade old. These are from deep corners of the internet that are kind of illegible to anybody who has not spent a significant portion of their life in these online spaces and made me think of ways that a lot of these dank corners of the internet, which are actually pretty influential and actually very old, it’s not some new thing that the kids are doing now. How deep they’ve gone and how, you know, this probably isn’t the last thing like this to reference some arcane meme. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We don’t know the specifics of Tyler Robinson’s ideology, but do the cultural references on the bullet casing shed any light? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think what the bullet casings tell us is that he’s not plugged into the same conversation about what’s going on in the world as you or I would be. Whether that conversation is mainstream media, you know, you’re reading a newspaper, you listen to a podcast like this, or it’s a bit more online, like you’re doom scrolling Twitter as a normal person would, or you’re, you know, on Instagram or TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think these memes come from an image board, heavy culture from kind of a private discord chat kind of culture. And not to say those cultures are always dark or insidious in any way, um, but there means that the general internet, they show up, but they’re not, you know, the entry level sorts of memes. And it makes me think that left-right doesn’t really adhere here in those spaces. This is a type of politics that’s sort of gone past the conversation we’re having, and it’s just a purely nihilistic sort of thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Again, in the messages cited in the court documents charging Robinson with aggravated murder, he allegedly told his roommate-slash-romantic partner that the engravings were, quote, “mostly a big meme.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think we live in a time where our politics is already so scrambled. You know, we’re barraged in this media environment of things happening constantly. And the left-right kind of division of one party wants big government, one party wants small government. That isn’t really relevant to the lives that I think most Americans are leading or the things they’re worried about from or about their government. And I think, we live with such sort of this ambient layer of tension and violence going on in this country. You know national guard in the streets and so on, that this act to me seems to be about, you know, it’s a “s***post”. It’s about responding to that, mirroring that back if the world’s given you that, you give that back to the world. And to me, the bigger issue is like reality. You know, it’s like the IRL world, this is more an act against just reality or just other people or society at large. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You said that this killing was a “shitpost.” um, can you elaborate on that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So a “shitpost” is a post that does not contribute to the conversation, that does not follow the rules of the conversation. One that sort of intentionally disrupts. Sometimes “shitposts” like kind of gently spread misinformation for comedic effect. Sometimes “shitposts” are just sort of a form of trolling. But in general, it’s kind of you just break the rules in the frame of the conversation to A, insert yourself and whoever you are into it. And sort of be just, I guess, to like protest the idea that, you know, this thing should make sense or that, you know, the people talking about it have any kind of authority or knowledge or standing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so by saying this killing was a “shitpost,” I think that it makes this intervention into our political discourse, which I think for young people and zoomers, Charlie Kirk was a really major figure into it and just refuses to recognize it as coherent. Comes in there like the troll comes into the forum, and disrupts the entire conversation, accelerates whatever’s happening, radicalizes it, just sort of comes into wreak havoc and destruction. And the impact of that and the appeal of it is to makes the shitposter the center of attention and derails the posting of other people and sucks up the oxygen in the room. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, posting for the sake of posting without necessarily deeper meaning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, posting for the sake of posting and to just like attack meaning. You know, there’s a lot of shit posters that I like personally who are doing interesting work. They’re really essential to meme culture and that kind of approach to the internet is essential. You know to say this doesn’t make sense, you know, or we can fool you into saying this because you were prepared to say it anyway. But taking that sort of ethic of discussion and deranging it in this way, I think is really disgusting. And so I don’t, it’s purposefully incoherent is kind of what I meant by it being a “shitpost”. And that’s its effect. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the search for the alleged shooter’s motives, some people theorized a connection to a white nationalist alt-right subculture known for its incendiary practices and very online community. While that theory seems more and more unlikely, the conversation around it is evergreen as more young people fall into these kinds of groups. That’s a new tab. We’ll get into that after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Charlie Kirk was known for his inflammatory comments. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Charlie Kirk: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Joy Reid and Michelle Obama and Sheila Jackson Lee and Katanji Brown Jackson. They’re coming out and they’re saying, “I’m only here because of affirmative action.” Yeah, we know. You do not have the brain processing power to otherwise be taken really seriously. You had to go steal a white person’s slot to go be taken somewhat seriously. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In addition to his anti-DEI stance, Kirk also opposed immigration, reproductive rights, gun control, vaccine requirements, LGBTQ rights, the passage of the Civil Rights Act, and the existence of climate change. He was a close ally of Donald Trump and was often lauded as the face of the new generation of Christian nationalism. But he was incredibly divisive. He It was even criticized by other conservatives who said that some of his speech was too extreme. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But another faction, led by an even more far-right influencer, criticized Kirk for his mainstream conservative appeal. Some people online have questioned whether the references on the bullet casings could have some connection to this alt-right subculture. To be clear, though there’s a lot we still don’t know about the specifics of the alleged shooter’s beliefs, it seems that his politics leans left of Kirk’s. Still, the groypers and their beef with Charlie Kirk are a noteworthy part of the context of this story. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that’s a new tab. What is a groyper? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, groypers are the fringiest fringe of online right-wing culture on these image boards, 4chan, Reddit, all the other platforms. Their de facto leader is this streamer, Nick Fuentes, who famously dined with Trump and Kanye West. Groypers are the people Kanye started hanging out with when he kind of took that turn. And the groypers are extremely online and they’re essentially neo-Nazis, but it’s this sort of s***poster edgelord attitude of transgressing any boundary and really having no regard for other people. Their moniker is Groyper, who is a mutation of Pepe the Frog into a toad, but kind of uh a bulbous, kind of diabolical looking toad. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Pepe the Frog is a relatively innocent webcomic character of a sad, green frog who was adopted as a mascot by 4chan users and the far-right back in 2015. Over the last decade, Pepe has evolved, taking on various costumes and forms. This more monstrous iteration, Groyper, has been adopted by an even more extreme group. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And they call themselves “The Groyper Army” and they famously feuded with Charlie Kirk. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the Groyper Wars of 2019. Who led them, what happened, and why is this subculture being shoved into the limelight now? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So to step into the time machine back to 2019. You have Turning Point USA run by Charlie Kirk, which essentially is an operation that takes donor money from right-wing sources and Kirk’s network of college chapters and youth influencers and brings these two things together to stage these massive events that are all about bringing young people to the right-wing cause. And in a way, laundering ideas and make them a bit more palatable to the younger generation. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Meanwhile, the groypers are here on these image boards posting radical stuff, many of them extremely young, like 13, 14 year olds. Um, and the groypers decide that Kirk is not radical enough for them or that Kirk is purposefully downplaying his radicality in order to, um, get mainstream appeal. And so the groypers decide to do this campaign of trolling him by showing up at these events where people are asking Kirk a question — these like “debate me” type things that he would — do and asking questions that, you know, are goading Kirk into saying something more extreme, more white supremacist, more antisemitic than what he was already saying. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And this groyper war, they come to his different events, they attack it. This all unfolds in 2019. And the leader of it is Nick Fuentes, who’s up on these streams, you know, calling his army onto Charlie Kirk, essentially. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk about what these memes and the way they engage in internet culture represents beyond like clear cut partisan lines? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, so it’s unconfirmed that Robinson was a groyper, but I’m certain in the internet spaces he frequented, he heard about it, he posted about it. He knew about it I’d imagine, just based off the niche-ness of those memes that are on the cartridges and other things we’ve learned about him. And what these memes overall show is Pepe the Frog is a collective self-portrait for a bunch of posters. And as a collective self-portrait, Pepe is interesting. You know, you can dress him up to represent whatever identity group, whatever, you know, subgroup you wanna have him be, put him in a cowboy hat, he’s Western, put them in a Confederate uniform, he’s that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But Pepe’s also a very sad frog. He’s crying or about to cry. He’s very wistful and often he’s depicted as sort of very small and in these situations where he’s like a little boy or something. And so I think that is another way this community scrambles our sense of how politics usually work because you expect the fascists to you know wear boots and be really tough and try to look like you know a soldier or something but for these guys it’s all about they’re they’re just little guys. You know they’re sad they’re they’re melancholy um and the and the draw is if you two are lonely, isolated, fragile, in the world somehow, come here and you can feel strong. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the price of that is you just reject everything that is normal and coherent in the world. And on the other side of that complete rejection, which you perform by posting the horrible meme or the hateful slur. On the other of that you find this brotherhood of violent freaks who will take you in. And I think that’s often the pitch that we see with these sort of far right online communities like groypers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, the alt-right and other, like you said, extremist communities have really taken advantage of that kind of sentiment. Can you talk about the deep emotional place that this online nihilist culture comes out of? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So it’s a deep emotional place that has existed long before the internet. You know, people have felt alienated, lonely, angry by society since we had society and researchers say that one of kind of the key triggers or amplifiers of radicalization is, you know, young people with nothing to do and no hope. And I think looking at the last 10 years of culture, um, there is a lack of hope happening. Um, the economy is bad. Uh, people feel isolated, uh, people feel like systems aren’t working for them. You know, people on both the right and the left feel a certain kind of, um, uncertainty, anxiety, and just disillusionment with, you know, traditional narrators, um telling the stories of our lives. Those no longer seem to cohere and make sense. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think when you are a young person who is confused, who is lost, who, um doesn’t have the support structures that you need, often the catches you is this — like an incel forum or groypers or something online that really does not have your best interests at heart. And really, if anything encourages whatever pathology you might be experiencing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the mainstream, whether on your everyday X feed or the traditional news media, there has been so much debate over which side of the political spectrum Robinson fell on. But Aidan said he found this kind of speculation counterproductive. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The conversation is counterproductive to me for two reasons. The first is that it’s such a motivated conversation, particularly from the right-wing. Before anything at all was known, they were saying this was a left-wing radical. And there’s a very clear reason why they were saying that, because they have a political agenda and they have certain people on the left or liberals that they want to crack down on and this is the pretense to do that. But the second, less kind of specific reason that it feels counterproductive to me, is that we’re past a point in our political conversation where it’s about, “do you think that government programs should be smaller or larger?” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re at a point where most people are growing up in this context of disaster and crisis. And the things motivating their politics are resentments and kind of triggers that aren’t really mappable to someone from like 1995. Um, like the Republican coalition is not these days about, you know, fiscal conservatives, evangelicals, religious folks. The Democrat coalition is not necessarily like, you now, the, the post-Civil Rights coalition that existed. Um, the reasons people are in these different camps — or actually most Americans are not in either camp at all would define themselves independent — is totally different than it was in the past. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Um, and I think I find myself kind of struggling to find what then the new categories are, because it’s one thing, like I say in my videos, be like, “oh, it’s not a left-right issue.” Then people are like, “but then what is it?” And I think that project of figuring out what it is, you know, what it feels like, what it means, is something that, you, know, all of us are going to have to kind of go through. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In wake of the shooting, social media sites and messaging platforms are under increased scrutiny. Both law enforcement and private civilians are monitoring the posts, videos, and comments that other people make about Charlie Kirk, taking action against anyone who criticizes the very controversial influencer. How will this change the way people engage with each other online? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re opening one last tab, Discord and Doxxing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The government is cracking down on online activity revolving around Charlie Kirk’s death. In an X post last week, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned that the Pentagon is keeping tabs on military personnel and Department of War civilian employees who celebrate or mock Kirk’s’ death. Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau threatened to revoke visas of anyone making similar posts. The FBI is reportedly monitoring the messaging platform Discord. Even people who haven’t explicitly celebrated or mocked the killing are being harassed and targeted for what they posted online. Opinion columnist Karen Attia announced that she had been fired from the Washington Post for social media posts in the wake of Kirk’s death that called out, quote, “political violence, racial double standards, and America’s apathy toward guns.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not just the government monitoring speech online. Private civilians are doing it too. An anonymously run website titled the Charlie Kirk Data Foundation has created a searchable database of people who’ve criticized Kirk online. Individual social media users have doxed others over their posts about Kirk, publicly posting their real names, phone numbers, home addresses, and other private information to target and harass them. All of this, from the government surveillance to the civilian-led doxing, is a serious threat to free speech on the internet. Here’s Aidan again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m extremely concerned about it. I’m more concerned about like a chilling effect on speech or on our online discourse and memes than I am with this escalating cycle of political violence. I mean, the two go hand in hand, of course, but I think stuff like JD Vance taking over the hosting chair for Kirk’s Show and using it to call out NGOs and liberal donors and leftists. I think that crack down is something that can have much deeper effects and hurt a lot of people. And I also think that in an age where we’re maybe seeing an authoritarian consolidation, calling for bans on the internet, calling for restrictions on the internet, the context that’s going to enter into is I think that will lead us down a dark road. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Last question, what is the current conversation missing by not understanding the deeply online context of this entire case? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the biggest thing the current conversation is missing is that it’s really not the current conversation. People who read newspapers, report for them, follow this stuff from kind of a news-brained, normie side of Twitter, I don’t think they realize that they’re just one niche among many niches on the internet. They’re a pretty big niche and a pretty important niche, of course. But I don’t think there’s really an understanding that CNN is no longer a narrator of American life. And not just from a partisan kind of perspective that really right-wing people are really left-wing people don’t listen to CNN anymore. Totally normal people don’t listen to CNN anymore because it isn’t legible to them. It doesn’t make sense to them, it talks in a way that, you know, seems to not acknowledge them or seems to treat them in a way that isn’t that respectful or doesn’t keep up with the times. And I worry that the mainstream conversation, it isn’t mainstream, but it still thinks of itself as mainstream. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, Aidan, thank you so much for joining us and for always explaining these corners of the internet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you so much for having me, Morgan, and for inviting me on. It’s always a joy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And with that, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Close All Tabs’ producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who’s KQDE’s Director of Podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager, and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor In Chief. Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California Local. Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dust Silver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We want to hear from you. Email us at closealltabs@KQED.org. Follow us on Instagram @CloseAllTabsPod or TikTok @CloseAllTabs. And join our Discord. We’re in the Close All tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12056209/groypers-doxxing-and-charlie-kirks-death-as-a-shitpost",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_35881",
"news_22434",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_35111",
"news_34305",
"news_17968",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12056213",
"label": "source_news_12056209"
},
"news_12055408": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12055408",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12055408",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1757498443000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "23andme-andgeneticprivacy",
"title": "23andMe (andGeneticPrivacy)",
"publishDate": 1757498443,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "23andMe (andGeneticPrivacy) | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When 23andMe filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, it set off alarm bells among privacy experts and consumers alike. According to a \u003c/span>\u003ca href=\"https://today.yougov.com/health/articles/51527-what-americans-think-about-home-dna-tests-poll\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">2025 survey\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, about 1 in 5 Americans has taken a home DNA test. Among those who haven’t, privacy ranks as one of their top concerns. As with so many things having to do with data, there’s a trade-off between confidentiality and the ability to access services that can improve our lives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The fallout from 23andMe’s bankruptcy and an earlier data breach has left consumers more wary than ever and has underscored the need for stronger data privacy laws. In today’s episode, we’ll hear from someone whose life was transformed by a 23andMe test, and from a genetic data and privacy researcher who explains the risks of handing over our DNA to a corporation. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC2302884115\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine Gallegos, media coordinator and 23andMe user\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://law.uiowa.edu/people/anya-prince\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Anya Prince\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">professor and genetic privacy researcher at the University of Iowa College of Law\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/can-you-hide-your-pregnancy-era-big-data/671692/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I Tried to Keep My Pregnancy Secret\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Anya Prince, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Atlantic \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2025/06/30/nx-s1-5451398/23andme-sale-approved-dna-data\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Judge OKs sale of 23andMe — and its trove of DNA data — to a nonprofit led by its founder\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — John Ruwitch, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NPR\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/30/california-ag-23andme-sale-00433554\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">California AG says 23andMe sale ‘does not comply’ with state law\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Tyler Katzenberger, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Politico\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/30/business/23andme-for-sale-genetic-data\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">23andMe is for sale. Here’s why companies might want your genetic data \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Lisa Eadicicco, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">CNN\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine Gallegos is a pillar of her community. She’s a mother, wife, former journalist at the local paper, now a beloved staff member at the local high school, and she volunteers in her spare time. She was even named Citizen of the Year in her hometown of Antioch, California, about an hour northeast of San Francisco. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I am a lifelong resident of Antioch, California. This really great um tight knit-kind of community. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine’s in her 60s now, but she grew up the baby of the family — her sister and brother are both over a decade older than her. They were a pretty working class family. Her dad, a veteran, managed pest control for military bases nearby, and her mom worked in a cannery and then in food service. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My parents were deeply proud of their background, as they should be. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine’s parents were both Mexican-American, and they’ve raised her to be proud of her heritage, too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just love like Spanglish, where they slap in, you know, some English and Spanish, and then one sentence might have English and Spanish. And so I really absorbed a lot of that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine grew up with very few questions about where she came from. As a kid, she had strawberry blonde hair, unlike anyone else in her family. But if anyone ever pointed out that she was different from the rest of the family, her fiercely protective mother would shut it down. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine does remember asking her parents why she was born in San Francisco while her siblings were born in Antioch, but they brushed it off with a loose explanation about her dad’s military health care. When Trine was five, her family suffered a devastating loss. Her brother, who was 19, had joined the Marines to fight in the Vietnam War, and he was killed in action. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I am sure some families suffer and kind of fall apart after something like that but we’re, you know, again very lucky in that we kept it together maybe even tighter. My mom was already a real protective parent and I think that I realized much later that probably spurred from, you know, losing my brother. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine grew up. She went to college, got married, and had a daughter of her own. She stayed super close with her older sister, and her sister’s kids, and eventually, their kids. In 2017, they all gathered to celebrate Trine’s 57th birthday. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re talking around the table and I say, “Oh, you know what I think is gonna be fun? I’m gonna do a DNA test. Like how Mexican are we?” And my mom had always spoke to maybe having some Native American, et cetera. So I just thought it would be interesting to have a little breakdown. And again, literally this is how I said it, “I think it’ll be fun just for fun.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Following some friends’ recommendations, she decided to use 23andMe. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was San Francisco based, right? And I was like, yeah, I’ll shop local, basically. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So she bought the kit, spat in a tube, and mailed it back to the lab in a neat little prepaid package. A few weeks later, Trine got her results back. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It said, literally almost down to exactly like 51% Filipino, 49% Irish. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which was, obviously, not at all what she expected. Her whole life, she had grown up proudly Mexican. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So when I got mine and read it and there’s like no Latin, no anything, I was just like what a waste, like yeah. I was just like, “Oh dang, give me my hundred bucks back!”\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine assumed that 23andMe had made a mistake. Maybe they had mixed up her results with someone else’s? Or their own data was inaccurate? The truth was, of course, a bit more complicated. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On today’s episode, we’re going to hear more of Trine’s story and also talk to a genetic privacy expert to find out what do you really give up when you take one of these tests? And is it worth it? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Before we get into the privacy questions surrounding 23andMe and all the other at-home DNA tests, let’s hear the rest of Trine’s story. And of course, that means opening a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Show DNA relatives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">About a year after receiving what she thought were bum results, Trine had forgotten about the 23andMe test. Her dad had passed away by then and her mom’s health was starting to decline. While their mom was still able to travel, Trine and her sister decided to take the whole family on a big trip to Hawaii. But throughout the trip, Trine noticed that her sister seemed stressed. During their last day, the family took a morning walk on the beach and Trine and her sister ended up alone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She’s acting kind of odd and then she’s asking me a few little questions and she brings up the 23andMe thing. And she goes, “Well, whatever happened to that test thing?” And I go, “Oh, it was a big frigging disaster. Like it messed up. It didn’t say anything about our like, you know, Mexican heritage or something like that.” And then she said, “Oh I just was, I was going to talk to you about something”, and kind of mumbly. And I was like, “Well just tell me.” so she says, “You’re adopted.”\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">At first, Trine was incredulous. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I go, “Right,” like almost laughing and then she touches my arm and then I knew and then it just like kind of made me real because you know, it was almost like a little comfort like, no, I’m not kidding. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And there, on the beach, Trine’s sister revealed a secret that she had been holding onto for almost 60 years. Before Trine’s arrival, their mom had had several miscarriages. Around that time, a distant family member was going through a rough patch and asked Trine’s parents to adopt their baby. Baby Gloria was a joyous part of their family for over six months. But then the relative came back and asked to take her out for one last car ride to say goodbye. They never came back. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, you know, a gut wrench, right? And I mean, they were, I mean just heartbroken. My sister and brother are like apparently crying every day. It was just a scene. And so my sister told me this, and I had heard about Gloria before, but obviously not my part of the story. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sometime later, when Trine’s brother was 14 and her sister was 12, their parents announced that they were going to take a drive into San Francisco. This wasn’t out of the ordinary. They went into the city all the time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then they get to this hospital. They get there and they’re in a room and a woman brings a baby in and hands her to my mom, it’s me, and then, you know, we all get in the car, we come to Antioch. And I guess as we arrive, or getting out of the car, my mom says very matter of factly, which my mom was a girl boss before it was a thing and she said, uh, “This is our baby and we’re not gonna tell anybody how this happened, this is our baby and that’s it and nobody’s gonna take her.” And then my brother and sister were like, “Yeah, fine, let’s go.” But this is all, again, from a 12-year-old’s point of view. That’s all she knew. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back on the beach, Trine was reeling, but she didn’t have time to process anything because the rest of the family was getting out of the water and fast approaching across the sand. They still had to pack, get through the airport and catch their flight back to California. So Trine pulled it together. She didn’t tell her husband or daughter about the bombshell her sister dropped until they got home nearly a day later. That’s when she broke. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m almost crying just thinking about because it was so intense. So now my daughter’s crying, my husband’s crying, because we’re like, “What? I don’t get it.” I was kind of a mini-wreck. I call it, where I was in “upside down world” and I’m pretty, you know, open and fairly lighthearted and positive, but that, you now, that took my knees out. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine still had so many questions. Who were her birth parents? Records were scarce, and there was no such thing as open adoptions back in 1960. Her sister didn’t have many answers, because she was so young when Trine was adopted. And they decided not to bring it up with their mom, who was more easily confused as she got older. A few weeks later, Trine’s nephew and his husband came by to check on her. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And my nephew’s husband, who had also done 23andMe, but he knew his results, he said, have you gone back to 23andMe and see if there’s any connections? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So she logged on for the first time in over a year and clicked, “show DNA relatives.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then sure enough, boom, like a big fatty circle that showed like a match that, not like partial not like fourth cousin like, you know, 100% this is your sibling. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That was Trine’s full biological brother, Mark. He’s five years younger than her. They messaged each other through the 23andMe website, hesitantly at first, and then over the next few weeks, shared more and more. Mark told her about their other younger brother, Sean, who’s eight years younger than her. The brothers had grown up in San Francisco and were even born in the same hospital that Trine was born in. They had both gotten married, and had kids, and raised their families less than an hour away from where Trine raised hers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They’ve been in the Bay Area the whole time. I always, you know, say that we’ve been 40 minutes away from each other and a bridge apart our whole lives. Just crazy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine was floored when she saw a picture of her youngest brother, Sean. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is my face. I look like Mark, you can definitely tell we’re siblings, but Sean has like the exact same coloring, the same kind of shape, more face. I mean, it was like just an absolute mind blow. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine, with her journalism background, had so many questions that it overwhelmed Mark. After a few weeks, he suggested that they meet up in person. They talked for over four hours. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, my mom, Delfina, was 16 when she got pregnant with me. Our father, Gary, was like 17 or 18. My biological grandma, Delfina’s mom, was like, “no, you’re 16, you can’t” — and this is 1960, this is not a thing. “You can’t have the baby, you have to finish school”, also you’re, you know, undertone, “You are Catholic and Filipina, no, no, no.” So, you know, that’s why she had to do, the adoption thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Delfina tragically died just before she turned 50. At her funeral, an aunt told Mark that he might have a sister somewhere out there, but didn’t elaborate. He was grieving and didn’t think much of it. Then, about 20 years later, his wife and daughter pressured him into taking a 23andMe test. That’s when Trine’s profile popped up. Despite the shock of it all, Trine said she’s actually grateful for the timing. If she’d learned that she was adopted before home DNA kits existed, she would have never met her brothers or have the answers she so desperately wanted. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If my sister had told me when I was 18 or 25 or when I trying to have a baby and had all these questions. I wouldn’t have known any of this information. I wouldn’t have any back story. And I think it just would have haunted me a little bit. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">After their first meeting, Mark and Trine introduced their families to each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Immediately we’re gabbing, we’re sharing stories, and I’m just, you know, taking it all in and eating it up and asking about childhood and what they did because, you know, we’ve got 50-some years to catch up on of stories. And um, when we left that dinner, my husband was like, “Oh wow.” So he’s seen that Mark and I have some, like, similar hand gestures and how we kind of pause and the cadence, which is also very wild to think about, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Is that genetic? You know, you have to wonder. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. It has to be, right? It’s just that is just wild to me, but also kind of cool. And then we eventually, not too long after, brought all of our families together. And, it is just all of us jumping in. We’re excited and also like, yikes, you know, like a family reunion we didn’t know we were gonna have. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But when they left, my sister looked at me. She said, “We have brothers again.” And that’s how she refers to him, too. And they refer to her as, “How’s her sister doing?” And because she’ll say, “have you heard from the brothers lately? What are they doing?” It’s not like, “Oh, how are your brothers doing?” You know, we’re just all melted together, you know. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine is one of the lucky, rare cases of a DNA test reuniting long-lost family members. But while Trine and her brothers were catching up and merging their families, 23andMe, as a company, has had some serious problems. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So when I did the 23andMe, I never even considered, “Oh yeah, I could be like super compromised.” “Hi, here’s my sample,” like, you know, but never thought of it. And then of course, it brought so much joy when it happened. Again, I didn’t really think of it, but Mark said he would have never done it if it hadn’t been for the bullying, no, for the encouragement of my sister-in-law and his daughter. He said, I’d never, that’s not his jam. And Sean, 100% hell no. Like he was like, absolutely not. And he is super aware of things that can go sideways, things that could be used against you, things that can bring you down, and he’s not wrong. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, what’s going on with 23andMe? We’ll dive into that mess in a new tab. But first, a quick break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, we’re back to talk about 23andMe, their legal issues, bankruptcy, and the big question, what are they doing with all that data? New tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">23andMe privacy nightmare. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re diving into this with Anya Prince, who’s a professor at the University of Iowa College of Law. She researches genetic privacy and discrimination. Before we get into the privacy questions, we need to set the scene. About 10 years ago, 23andMe was super hot and trendy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think 23andMe held a lot of promise and marketed itself as this fun, quirky thing, but also part of a larger goal, right. So when 23andMe first launched, they literally had spit parties where they invited, you know, famous people to come to parties and spit in tubes and learn about themselves. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So it was this really fun thing and it wasn’t necessarily about health back then. It was more about, like, you know, you learn whether or not you can, you know, curl your tongue or whatever quirky genetic traits, learn about your ancestry, learn about where you came from. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it’s really grown to, to have more, um, health testing. And also this research side, I think while it’s not the main focus, I think 23andMe did sell itself as like, you can be part of something bigger by opting into research as well. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk more about that goal they had of like helping with this grand plan to develop new treatments and special drugs? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, it’s a really fascinating goal, right? So on the one hand, we could think that this is really beneficial, right, that here’s this good company that’s saying, “Not only we’re gonna provide this interesting service where we tell people about their ancestry, but also we’re going to build this database that can advance science and be for community good.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think that’s one version of the story that has a lot of truth to it. But I think there’s another version of this story that has lot of true to it too. And that is the business model. Here is a company that took money from people to give them that information, and that was one side of their business model, and had a second business model where they then sold that information to pharmaceutical companies and the like. Or did their own research with it and applied for patents, which then brings in money as well. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so a less charitable version of the story is that it’s a really fascinating business model where you’re making money both on the consumer side and then selling their data — and then possibly making cures or drugs that could help ameliorate some of the original customers’ diseases and then charging them for it again. And so, I think both sides of that story have some truth to it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When it comes to genetic data specifically, what’s the difference between getting tested in a clinical setting, like a doctor’s office, and submitting a test through an at-home direct-to-consumer company like 23andMe? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So in our healthcare setting, we start with the premise that health information, including genetic information, is private, and it can only be shared if it meets certain exceptions or requirements. In the direct-to-consumer testing setting, at least at the federal level, we start with the presumption that the data can be shared as widely as the privacy policy lets it be shared. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">23andMe did allow customers to opt out of sharing and storing their genetic information. And to their credit, they also let customers fully delete their accounts and all the data associated with it. And this is important because all that data has been a huge concern in recent years. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> So there w\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">as a data breach where millions of customers’ data was leaked onto the dark web, essentially. And eventually this came out, and one of the pieces that came out with that is that it seemed like the hackers were particularly targeting individuals that had Ashkenazi Jewish descent or Chinese ancestry. And so there’s concerns of like why why those groups, what was their aim? Um, that I think I haven’t seen really that those questions have been answered. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Do you remember when you first heard about it, what was your first reaction as a privacy expert who literally specializes in genetic privacy? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In terms of a privacy perspective, these hacks happen all the time. Not that they should, but it does happen. But then you do worry, like, okay, now that’s out there. If it’s a credit card breach, so many people have made this analogy, but you can change your credit card, you can, you know, change your email address, but can’t update and get a new version of your DNA. So once it’s out there, it’s out there. And I think that is one of the more concerning sides. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the bankruptcy. So this data breach resulted in a $30 million class action lawsuit. Last year, the company filed for bankruptcy and announced plans to sell its assets, including all of that customer DNA information. Why does that raise red flags for privacy advocates? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because there’s very few federal restrictions in who could buy that data, there were so many open questions. Could a pharmaceutical company purchase this data? Could somebody like a company affiliated with law enforcement purchase this data? Could a foreign nation purchase this data? And the answers were really any of those, for the most part. There are some restrictions on so-called countries of concern. But for the first part, under federal law, it goes to whoever has the most money and wants to bid on it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so all of a sudden, people were in the position where their most sensitive genetic data, arguably, the most immutable data that they have out there is for sale to the highest bidder. And that was well within the privacy policy, right? The privacy policy of 23andMe stated that this data could be sold in bankruptcy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think many customers, I don’t know if most, never really sat down and thought, “Oh, my genetic data all of a sudden is an asset of this company.” And not just an asset, like the most valuable asset that this company has. And so there have been plenty of other bankruptcies where private data has been an asset, but not one in the same volume and to the extent where that’s like the main sort of business model and the most sensitive of data. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A few months ago, a judge approved the sale of 23andMe, and all of its data, back to one of its co-founders, or really TTAM, a nonprofit research institute led by one of the company’s co-founders. TTAM, by the way, is an acronym for Twenty Three and Me. Initially, privacy advocates were concerned about who would end up in possession of 23andMe’s data if the company sold. But a few of the states suing 23andMe backed off once that sale to TTAM was approved. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And in some ways, that makes a lot of sense, right? People trusted 23andMe. They said, “OK, here’s this company. I believe in their ethos. I like that they’re doing research. I trust their security, at least maybe before the hack. And so I’m going to give my information to them.” And we do this all the time as customers, right. We don’t read the privacy policies, but we generally think, “OK. Here’s a well-known, good company, and we’re going to trust that they going to be good stewards of the data.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, if that was the reason that you chose 23andMe to give your genetic data to, then there’s probably a sigh of relief that TTAM is the buyer, because they’re gonna have a very similar ethos. They are keeping basically the same employees, same structure, and so we think, “Oh good, it wasn’t a big bad pharmaceutical company, or it wasn’t a law enforcement company, or it wasn’t some other country that now has a bunch of Americans’ data. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think it’s a missed opportunity to breathe such a sigh of relief that we don’t reflect upon the real true gaps in genetic privacy law that this example really exposed or highlighted. There isn’t really anything to stop the next company that has fewer privacy protections in their privacy policy to begin with from being sold with much less press, and it just goes under the radar, but the same privacy concerns exist. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A lot of people believe that even though this country doesn’t have robust protections for data privacy, their health information at least is safe. That’s not always true though. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, better known as HIPAA, only protects sensitive health information when it’s collected in a healthcare setting — like insurance or a doctor’s office. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But outside of that setting, a lot of your private data is fair game. Your fitness watch tracking your heart rate, The FemTech apps tracking menstrual cycles, the vitamins you buy using your credit card. All of this information is health information that can be collected and sold to the highest bidder. Why is that so concerning? Let’s open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is your health data really worth? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like we’ve talked about, health data is regulated or protected. What are other ways that this information has been mishandled or exploited? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, so one of the big ones, I think, with health data in particular is the potential use by advertisers. So if you think about times in your life where your purchasing habits have changed, a change in health status is one of those, right? You need a new insulin pump. You need new brace for your knee. You need any number of things, right. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so. Our health data can be really of interest to advertisers who say, “Yeah, if I can find out that Mrs. Smith is pre-diabetic, let me start to market to her healthy foods or insulin or whatever else it is and hope that she purchases my product instead of the competitor.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And for some people, that’s good. Maybe they find the product that’s really going to help them. And I think for others, it could be exploitative or lead them to a choice of product that wasn’t the best for them because it’s not within a clinical setting decision. And so there’s both pros and cons to it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The concern is not just about advertisers getting a hold of your personal health data. After Roe v. Wade was overturned, reproductive rights advocates raised concerns over how this kind of information could be used to criminalize people who would had abortions or even miscarriages. HIPAA doesn’t apply to most healthcare apps or at-home tests. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And when it comes to DNA information, the lack of privacy regulation is pretty troubling. What would stop law enforcement from mining DNA test results? The Golden State Killer, one of California’s most notorious serial killers, was caught through a relative’s DNA test. Obviously, that’s an extreme example, and 23andMe says they don’t let law enforcement into their databases. But here’s why you should probably care.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> I think some of the concerns I have with it are, one, you’re going to start to use it in the serial killer case, and that’s great. It’s good to catch serial killers. But what I worry about is the slippery slope, right? Where, okay, then it’s used in an assault case, then then it is used in this. And how far down the slippery slope do you go to where it’s just really common to use this anytime there’s DNA available for a crime? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And our constitutional protections would not let the police just set up a stop on a street corner and do genetic testing of every single person in the hopes of finding somebody related to the perpetrator. So why would we treat a genetic database any different? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the other privacy concern with law enforcement is that they’re not just logging onto the database and finding the suspect, right, for the most part. What’s happening more often is they find what’s called a partial match. And so they say, oh, we have this genetic sample from the crime scene, and then we found this sample that like 15% of it matches. Well, that means that it’s a relative, but it’s not like a brother, sister, it’s like a parent, sibling, it’s too far removed. So then they have to start building family trees and they can build backwards up to the great, great grandpa and then downwards. And so there’s a lot of people that are investigated, not as suspects, but as linked to suspects. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So all of a sudden, you might have police knocking on somebody’s door to say, “Could you give a confirmatory sample so that we can then try to figure out if you’re related to the person and if you are the brother whose family tree this is part of.” So I worry just potentially even more about the privacy and the respect for the non-suspects who are also implicated in these investigations than the suspect themselves. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this story, we’re also hearing from someone who found her long lost family members through a 23andMe test. It seems like there’s a significant trade-off here. To find this part of yourself, you have to risk your privacy. If someone did choose to take an at-home DNA test, what precautions would you recommend? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So first I’d say like, absolutely, it’s a trade-off. I mean, as I’m sure many of you listeners know, every time we share data out there, whether it’s with our friend or individual or a company, we are making trade-offs about confidentiality and privacy. And I think it’s completely normal and rational trade-off to participate in something like 23andMe. Whether it’s to learn about health risks, whether it is to learn about family members, whether it’s to learn about your ancestry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m a really private person, so I haven’t made that trade-off, because that’s not something that feels comfortable for me. But I also, I’m not surprised that millions of people have made that trade-off. And for most people, it’s fine, right? They don’t have a privacy risk. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My hope, though, would be that law and policy catch up a little bit, right, where the data is more protected so that there can’t be misuse, right? Where we have more robust genetic anti-discrimination laws, where we have more structures in place for how and when law enforcement could access this data, and that we have rules about how companies that collect this data have to care for it, you know, as stewards of this data and not just have it be profit-making endeavor. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks so much for joining us and for just sharing all of this information. I’m gonna go delete everything from everything online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine, for one, was pretty freaked out about the 23andMe data breach, and then bankruptcy, and then sale. As she watched the headlines roll in, she decided to deactivate her account and permanently delete her data. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I got my info, I got win with my brothers and I really don’t need and now I really am concerned like who is this gonna go to now? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There were a few more distant family members that popped up as matches, but Trine wasn’t too pressed about connecting with them. Especially not through 23andMe.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> I’m like I’m fine with that. I don’t really need more, unless they want to come to us and gather. That’s good, but I don’t need to do it through this platform anymore. I think it’s hard for me not to have my little rose-colored glasses on, which is how I often view the world, especially now I really need them, because mine was so joyful. So yeah, I probably say yeah, take a beat, investigate the bejeebus out of whatever thing you think you’re gonna go through and do, you know, kind of thing. But for me, I mean, lucky. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Worth it for you? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, 100. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Despite learning that she is, in fact, Filipina and Irish, Trini still identifies as 100% Mexican. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I- Clearly raised Mexican, you know, have the heart of it. So I can’t un-Mexican myself.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She did have a small crisis when she renewed her driver’s license and had to decide whether to check the box for Hispanic. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Honestly, I cried for like two minutes. And then I was like, no? Question mark? Then I found Filipino and then I moved on because, you know, that’s just a form. You know, when I’m asked, I say I’m Mexican.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A DNA test can reveal a lot about our backgrounds, but ultimately, it can’t decide who we are. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, now let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s director of podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California, Local. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to Donate.KQED.org/podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "A 23andMe user uncovers a life-changing family secret, while a researcher warns of DNA privacy risks.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1757483544,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 122,
"wordCount": 6474
},
"headData": {
"title": "23andMe (andGeneticPrivacy) | KQED",
"description": "When 23andMe filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, it set off alarm bells among privacy experts and consumers alike. According to a 2025 survey, about 1 in 5 Americans has taken a home DNA test. Among those who haven’t, privacy ranks as one of their top concerns. As with so many things having to do with data, there’s a trade-off between confidentiality and the ability to access services that can improve our lives.The fallout from 23andMe’s bankruptcy and an earlier data breach has left consumers more wary than ever and has underscored the need for stronger data privacy laws. In today’s episode, we’ll hear from someone whose life was transformed by a 23andMe test, and from a genetic data and privacy researcher who explains the risks of handing over our DNA to a corporation.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "When 23andMe filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, it set off alarm bells among privacy experts and consumers alike. According to a 2025 survey, about 1 in 5 Americans has taken a home DNA test. Among those who haven’t, privacy ranks as one of their top concerns. As with so many things having to do with data, there’s a trade-off between confidentiality and the ability to access services that can improve our lives.The fallout from 23andMe’s bankruptcy and an earlier data breach has left consumers more wary than ever and has underscored the need for stronger data privacy laws. In today’s episode, we’ll hear from someone whose life was transformed by a 23andMe test, and from a genetic data and privacy researcher who explains the risks of handing over our DNA to a corporation.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "23andMe (andGeneticPrivacy)",
"datePublished": "2025-09-10T03:00:43-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-09-09T22:52:24-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC2302884115.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12055408/23andme-andgeneticprivacy",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When 23andMe filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, it set off alarm bells among privacy experts and consumers alike. According to a \u003c/span>\u003ca href=\"https://today.yougov.com/health/articles/51527-what-americans-think-about-home-dna-tests-poll\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">2025 survey\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, about 1 in 5 Americans has taken a home DNA test. Among those who haven’t, privacy ranks as one of their top concerns. As with so many things having to do with data, there’s a trade-off between confidentiality and the ability to access services that can improve our lives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The fallout from 23andMe’s bankruptcy and an earlier data breach has left consumers more wary than ever and has underscored the need for stronger data privacy laws. In today’s episode, we’ll hear from someone whose life was transformed by a 23andMe test, and from a genetic data and privacy researcher who explains the risks of handing over our DNA to a corporation. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC2302884115\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine Gallegos, media coordinator and 23andMe user\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://law.uiowa.edu/people/anya-prince\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Anya Prince\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">professor and genetic privacy researcher at the University of Iowa College of Law\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2022/10/can-you-hide-your-pregnancy-era-big-data/671692/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I Tried to Keep My Pregnancy Secret\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Anya Prince, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Atlantic \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2025/06/30/nx-s1-5451398/23andme-sale-approved-dna-data\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Judge OKs sale of 23andMe — and its trove of DNA data — to a nonprofit led by its founder\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — John Ruwitch, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NPR\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.politico.com/news/2025/06/30/california-ag-23andme-sale-00433554\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">California AG says 23andMe sale ‘does not comply’ with state law\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Tyler Katzenberger, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Politico\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.cnn.com/2025/03/30/business/23andme-for-sale-genetic-data\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">23andMe is for sale. Here’s why companies might want your genetic data \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Lisa Eadicicco, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">CNN\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine Gallegos is a pillar of her community. She’s a mother, wife, former journalist at the local paper, now a beloved staff member at the local high school, and she volunteers in her spare time. She was even named Citizen of the Year in her hometown of Antioch, California, about an hour northeast of San Francisco. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I am a lifelong resident of Antioch, California. This really great um tight knit-kind of community. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine’s in her 60s now, but she grew up the baby of the family — her sister and brother are both over a decade older than her. They were a pretty working class family. Her dad, a veteran, managed pest control for military bases nearby, and her mom worked in a cannery and then in food service. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My parents were deeply proud of their background, as they should be. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine’s parents were both Mexican-American, and they’ve raised her to be proud of her heritage, too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just love like Spanglish, where they slap in, you know, some English and Spanish, and then one sentence might have English and Spanish. And so I really absorbed a lot of that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine grew up with very few questions about where she came from. As a kid, she had strawberry blonde hair, unlike anyone else in her family. But if anyone ever pointed out that she was different from the rest of the family, her fiercely protective mother would shut it down. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine does remember asking her parents why she was born in San Francisco while her siblings were born in Antioch, but they brushed it off with a loose explanation about her dad’s military health care. When Trine was five, her family suffered a devastating loss. Her brother, who was 19, had joined the Marines to fight in the Vietnam War, and he was killed in action. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I am sure some families suffer and kind of fall apart after something like that but we’re, you know, again very lucky in that we kept it together maybe even tighter. My mom was already a real protective parent and I think that I realized much later that probably spurred from, you know, losing my brother. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine grew up. She went to college, got married, and had a daughter of her own. She stayed super close with her older sister, and her sister’s kids, and eventually, their kids. In 2017, they all gathered to celebrate Trine’s 57th birthday. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re talking around the table and I say, “Oh, you know what I think is gonna be fun? I’m gonna do a DNA test. Like how Mexican are we?” And my mom had always spoke to maybe having some Native American, et cetera. So I just thought it would be interesting to have a little breakdown. And again, literally this is how I said it, “I think it’ll be fun just for fun.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Following some friends’ recommendations, she decided to use 23andMe. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It was San Francisco based, right? And I was like, yeah, I’ll shop local, basically. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So she bought the kit, spat in a tube, and mailed it back to the lab in a neat little prepaid package. A few weeks later, Trine got her results back. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It said, literally almost down to exactly like 51% Filipino, 49% Irish. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which was, obviously, not at all what she expected. Her whole life, she had grown up proudly Mexican. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So when I got mine and read it and there’s like no Latin, no anything, I was just like what a waste, like yeah. I was just like, “Oh dang, give me my hundred bucks back!”\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine assumed that 23andMe had made a mistake. Maybe they had mixed up her results with someone else’s? Or their own data was inaccurate? The truth was, of course, a bit more complicated. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On today’s episode, we’re going to hear more of Trine’s story and also talk to a genetic privacy expert to find out what do you really give up when you take one of these tests? And is it worth it? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Before we get into the privacy questions surrounding 23andMe and all the other at-home DNA tests, let’s hear the rest of Trine’s story. And of course, that means opening a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Show DNA relatives. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">About a year after receiving what she thought were bum results, Trine had forgotten about the 23andMe test. Her dad had passed away by then and her mom’s health was starting to decline. While their mom was still able to travel, Trine and her sister decided to take the whole family on a big trip to Hawaii. But throughout the trip, Trine noticed that her sister seemed stressed. During their last day, the family took a morning walk on the beach and Trine and her sister ended up alone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She’s acting kind of odd and then she’s asking me a few little questions and she brings up the 23andMe thing. And she goes, “Well, whatever happened to that test thing?” And I go, “Oh, it was a big frigging disaster. Like it messed up. It didn’t say anything about our like, you know, Mexican heritage or something like that.” And then she said, “Oh I just was, I was going to talk to you about something”, and kind of mumbly. And I was like, “Well just tell me.” so she says, “You’re adopted.”\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">At first, Trine was incredulous. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I go, “Right,” like almost laughing and then she touches my arm and then I knew and then it just like kind of made me real because you know, it was almost like a little comfort like, no, I’m not kidding. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And there, on the beach, Trine’s sister revealed a secret that she had been holding onto for almost 60 years. Before Trine’s arrival, their mom had had several miscarriages. Around that time, a distant family member was going through a rough patch and asked Trine’s parents to adopt their baby. Baby Gloria was a joyous part of their family for over six months. But then the relative came back and asked to take her out for one last car ride to say goodbye. They never came back. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, you know, a gut wrench, right? And I mean, they were, I mean just heartbroken. My sister and brother are like apparently crying every day. It was just a scene. And so my sister told me this, and I had heard about Gloria before, but obviously not my part of the story. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sometime later, when Trine’s brother was 14 and her sister was 12, their parents announced that they were going to take a drive into San Francisco. This wasn’t out of the ordinary. They went into the city all the time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then they get to this hospital. They get there and they’re in a room and a woman brings a baby in and hands her to my mom, it’s me, and then, you know, we all get in the car, we come to Antioch. And I guess as we arrive, or getting out of the car, my mom says very matter of factly, which my mom was a girl boss before it was a thing and she said, uh, “This is our baby and we’re not gonna tell anybody how this happened, this is our baby and that’s it and nobody’s gonna take her.” And then my brother and sister were like, “Yeah, fine, let’s go.” But this is all, again, from a 12-year-old’s point of view. That’s all she knew. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back on the beach, Trine was reeling, but she didn’t have time to process anything because the rest of the family was getting out of the water and fast approaching across the sand. They still had to pack, get through the airport and catch their flight back to California. So Trine pulled it together. She didn’t tell her husband or daughter about the bombshell her sister dropped until they got home nearly a day later. That’s when she broke. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m almost crying just thinking about because it was so intense. So now my daughter’s crying, my husband’s crying, because we’re like, “What? I don’t get it.” I was kind of a mini-wreck. I call it, where I was in “upside down world” and I’m pretty, you know, open and fairly lighthearted and positive, but that, you now, that took my knees out. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine still had so many questions. Who were her birth parents? Records were scarce, and there was no such thing as open adoptions back in 1960. Her sister didn’t have many answers, because she was so young when Trine was adopted. And they decided not to bring it up with their mom, who was more easily confused as she got older. A few weeks later, Trine’s nephew and his husband came by to check on her. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And my nephew’s husband, who had also done 23andMe, but he knew his results, he said, have you gone back to 23andMe and see if there’s any connections? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So she logged on for the first time in over a year and clicked, “show DNA relatives.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then sure enough, boom, like a big fatty circle that showed like a match that, not like partial not like fourth cousin like, you know, 100% this is your sibling. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That was Trine’s full biological brother, Mark. He’s five years younger than her. They messaged each other through the 23andMe website, hesitantly at first, and then over the next few weeks, shared more and more. Mark told her about their other younger brother, Sean, who’s eight years younger than her. The brothers had grown up in San Francisco and were even born in the same hospital that Trine was born in. They had both gotten married, and had kids, and raised their families less than an hour away from where Trine raised hers. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They’ve been in the Bay Area the whole time. I always, you know, say that we’ve been 40 minutes away from each other and a bridge apart our whole lives. Just crazy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine was floored when she saw a picture of her youngest brother, Sean. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is my face. I look like Mark, you can definitely tell we’re siblings, but Sean has like the exact same coloring, the same kind of shape, more face. I mean, it was like just an absolute mind blow. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine, with her journalism background, had so many questions that it overwhelmed Mark. After a few weeks, he suggested that they meet up in person. They talked for over four hours. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, my mom, Delfina, was 16 when she got pregnant with me. Our father, Gary, was like 17 or 18. My biological grandma, Delfina’s mom, was like, “no, you’re 16, you can’t” — and this is 1960, this is not a thing. “You can’t have the baby, you have to finish school”, also you’re, you know, undertone, “You are Catholic and Filipina, no, no, no.” So, you know, that’s why she had to do, the adoption thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Delfina tragically died just before she turned 50. At her funeral, an aunt told Mark that he might have a sister somewhere out there, but didn’t elaborate. He was grieving and didn’t think much of it. Then, about 20 years later, his wife and daughter pressured him into taking a 23andMe test. That’s when Trine’s profile popped up. Despite the shock of it all, Trine said she’s actually grateful for the timing. If she’d learned that she was adopted before home DNA kits existed, she would have never met her brothers or have the answers she so desperately wanted. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If my sister had told me when I was 18 or 25 or when I trying to have a baby and had all these questions. I wouldn’t have known any of this information. I wouldn’t have any back story. And I think it just would have haunted me a little bit. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">After their first meeting, Mark and Trine introduced their families to each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Immediately we’re gabbing, we’re sharing stories, and I’m just, you know, taking it all in and eating it up and asking about childhood and what they did because, you know, we’ve got 50-some years to catch up on of stories. And um, when we left that dinner, my husband was like, “Oh wow.” So he’s seen that Mark and I have some, like, similar hand gestures and how we kind of pause and the cadence, which is also very wild to think about, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Is that genetic? You know, you have to wonder. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. It has to be, right? It’s just that is just wild to me, but also kind of cool. And then we eventually, not too long after, brought all of our families together. And, it is just all of us jumping in. We’re excited and also like, yikes, you know, like a family reunion we didn’t know we were gonna have. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But when they left, my sister looked at me. She said, “We have brothers again.” And that’s how she refers to him, too. And they refer to her as, “How’s her sister doing?” And because she’ll say, “have you heard from the brothers lately? What are they doing?” It’s not like, “Oh, how are your brothers doing?” You know, we’re just all melted together, you know. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine is one of the lucky, rare cases of a DNA test reuniting long-lost family members. But while Trine and her brothers were catching up and merging their families, 23andMe, as a company, has had some serious problems. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So when I did the 23andMe, I never even considered, “Oh yeah, I could be like super compromised.” “Hi, here’s my sample,” like, you know, but never thought of it. And then of course, it brought so much joy when it happened. Again, I didn’t really think of it, but Mark said he would have never done it if it hadn’t been for the bullying, no, for the encouragement of my sister-in-law and his daughter. He said, I’d never, that’s not his jam. And Sean, 100% hell no. Like he was like, absolutely not. And he is super aware of things that can go sideways, things that could be used against you, things that can bring you down, and he’s not wrong. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, what’s going on with 23andMe? We’ll dive into that mess in a new tab. But first, a quick break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, we’re back to talk about 23andMe, their legal issues, bankruptcy, and the big question, what are they doing with all that data? New tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">23andMe privacy nightmare. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re diving into this with Anya Prince, who’s a professor at the University of Iowa College of Law. She researches genetic privacy and discrimination. Before we get into the privacy questions, we need to set the scene. About 10 years ago, 23andMe was super hot and trendy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think 23andMe held a lot of promise and marketed itself as this fun, quirky thing, but also part of a larger goal, right. So when 23andMe first launched, they literally had spit parties where they invited, you know, famous people to come to parties and spit in tubes and learn about themselves. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So it was this really fun thing and it wasn’t necessarily about health back then. It was more about, like, you know, you learn whether or not you can, you know, curl your tongue or whatever quirky genetic traits, learn about your ancestry, learn about where you came from. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it’s really grown to, to have more, um, health testing. And also this research side, I think while it’s not the main focus, I think 23andMe did sell itself as like, you can be part of something bigger by opting into research as well. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk more about that goal they had of like helping with this grand plan to develop new treatments and special drugs? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, it’s a really fascinating goal, right? So on the one hand, we could think that this is really beneficial, right, that here’s this good company that’s saying, “Not only we’re gonna provide this interesting service where we tell people about their ancestry, but also we’re going to build this database that can advance science and be for community good.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think that’s one version of the story that has a lot of truth to it. But I think there’s another version of this story that has lot of true to it too. And that is the business model. Here is a company that took money from people to give them that information, and that was one side of their business model, and had a second business model where they then sold that information to pharmaceutical companies and the like. Or did their own research with it and applied for patents, which then brings in money as well. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so a less charitable version of the story is that it’s a really fascinating business model where you’re making money both on the consumer side and then selling their data — and then possibly making cures or drugs that could help ameliorate some of the original customers’ diseases and then charging them for it again. And so, I think both sides of that story have some truth to it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When it comes to genetic data specifically, what’s the difference between getting tested in a clinical setting, like a doctor’s office, and submitting a test through an at-home direct-to-consumer company like 23andMe? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So in our healthcare setting, we start with the premise that health information, including genetic information, is private, and it can only be shared if it meets certain exceptions or requirements. In the direct-to-consumer testing setting, at least at the federal level, we start with the presumption that the data can be shared as widely as the privacy policy lets it be shared. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">23andMe did allow customers to opt out of sharing and storing their genetic information. And to their credit, they also let customers fully delete their accounts and all the data associated with it. And this is important because all that data has been a huge concern in recent years. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> So there w\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">as a data breach where millions of customers’ data was leaked onto the dark web, essentially. And eventually this came out, and one of the pieces that came out with that is that it seemed like the hackers were particularly targeting individuals that had Ashkenazi Jewish descent or Chinese ancestry. And so there’s concerns of like why why those groups, what was their aim? Um, that I think I haven’t seen really that those questions have been answered. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Do you remember when you first heard about it, what was your first reaction as a privacy expert who literally specializes in genetic privacy? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In terms of a privacy perspective, these hacks happen all the time. Not that they should, but it does happen. But then you do worry, like, okay, now that’s out there. If it’s a credit card breach, so many people have made this analogy, but you can change your credit card, you can, you know, change your email address, but can’t update and get a new version of your DNA. So once it’s out there, it’s out there. And I think that is one of the more concerning sides. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s talk about the bankruptcy. So this data breach resulted in a $30 million class action lawsuit. Last year, the company filed for bankruptcy and announced plans to sell its assets, including all of that customer DNA information. Why does that raise red flags for privacy advocates? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because there’s very few federal restrictions in who could buy that data, there were so many open questions. Could a pharmaceutical company purchase this data? Could somebody like a company affiliated with law enforcement purchase this data? Could a foreign nation purchase this data? And the answers were really any of those, for the most part. There are some restrictions on so-called countries of concern. But for the first part, under federal law, it goes to whoever has the most money and wants to bid on it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so all of a sudden, people were in the position where their most sensitive genetic data, arguably, the most immutable data that they have out there is for sale to the highest bidder. And that was well within the privacy policy, right? The privacy policy of 23andMe stated that this data could be sold in bankruptcy. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think many customers, I don’t know if most, never really sat down and thought, “Oh, my genetic data all of a sudden is an asset of this company.” And not just an asset, like the most valuable asset that this company has. And so there have been plenty of other bankruptcies where private data has been an asset, but not one in the same volume and to the extent where that’s like the main sort of business model and the most sensitive of data. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A few months ago, a judge approved the sale of 23andMe, and all of its data, back to one of its co-founders, or really TTAM, a nonprofit research institute led by one of the company’s co-founders. TTAM, by the way, is an acronym for Twenty Three and Me. Initially, privacy advocates were concerned about who would end up in possession of 23andMe’s data if the company sold. But a few of the states suing 23andMe backed off once that sale to TTAM was approved. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And in some ways, that makes a lot of sense, right? People trusted 23andMe. They said, “OK, here’s this company. I believe in their ethos. I like that they’re doing research. I trust their security, at least maybe before the hack. And so I’m going to give my information to them.” And we do this all the time as customers, right. We don’t read the privacy policies, but we generally think, “OK. Here’s a well-known, good company, and we’re going to trust that they going to be good stewards of the data.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, if that was the reason that you chose 23andMe to give your genetic data to, then there’s probably a sigh of relief that TTAM is the buyer, because they’re gonna have a very similar ethos. They are keeping basically the same employees, same structure, and so we think, “Oh good, it wasn’t a big bad pharmaceutical company, or it wasn’t a law enforcement company, or it wasn’t some other country that now has a bunch of Americans’ data. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think it’s a missed opportunity to breathe such a sigh of relief that we don’t reflect upon the real true gaps in genetic privacy law that this example really exposed or highlighted. There isn’t really anything to stop the next company that has fewer privacy protections in their privacy policy to begin with from being sold with much less press, and it just goes under the radar, but the same privacy concerns exist. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A lot of people believe that even though this country doesn’t have robust protections for data privacy, their health information at least is safe. That’s not always true though. The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, better known as HIPAA, only protects sensitive health information when it’s collected in a healthcare setting — like insurance or a doctor’s office. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But outside of that setting, a lot of your private data is fair game. Your fitness watch tracking your heart rate, The FemTech apps tracking menstrual cycles, the vitamins you buy using your credit card. All of this information is health information that can be collected and sold to the highest bidder. Why is that so concerning? Let’s open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is your health data really worth? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like we’ve talked about, health data is regulated or protected. What are other ways that this information has been mishandled or exploited? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, so one of the big ones, I think, with health data in particular is the potential use by advertisers. So if you think about times in your life where your purchasing habits have changed, a change in health status is one of those, right? You need a new insulin pump. You need new brace for your knee. You need any number of things, right. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so. Our health data can be really of interest to advertisers who say, “Yeah, if I can find out that Mrs. Smith is pre-diabetic, let me start to market to her healthy foods or insulin or whatever else it is and hope that she purchases my product instead of the competitor.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And for some people, that’s good. Maybe they find the product that’s really going to help them. And I think for others, it could be exploitative or lead them to a choice of product that wasn’t the best for them because it’s not within a clinical setting decision. And so there’s both pros and cons to it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The concern is not just about advertisers getting a hold of your personal health data. After Roe v. Wade was overturned, reproductive rights advocates raised concerns over how this kind of information could be used to criminalize people who would had abortions or even miscarriages. HIPAA doesn’t apply to most healthcare apps or at-home tests. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And when it comes to DNA information, the lack of privacy regulation is pretty troubling. What would stop law enforcement from mining DNA test results? The Golden State Killer, one of California’s most notorious serial killers, was caught through a relative’s DNA test. Obviously, that’s an extreme example, and 23andMe says they don’t let law enforcement into their databases. But here’s why you should probably care.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> I think some of the concerns I have with it are, one, you’re going to start to use it in the serial killer case, and that’s great. It’s good to catch serial killers. But what I worry about is the slippery slope, right? Where, okay, then it’s used in an assault case, then then it is used in this. And how far down the slippery slope do you go to where it’s just really common to use this anytime there’s DNA available for a crime? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And our constitutional protections would not let the police just set up a stop on a street corner and do genetic testing of every single person in the hopes of finding somebody related to the perpetrator. So why would we treat a genetic database any different? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think the other privacy concern with law enforcement is that they’re not just logging onto the database and finding the suspect, right, for the most part. What’s happening more often is they find what’s called a partial match. And so they say, oh, we have this genetic sample from the crime scene, and then we found this sample that like 15% of it matches. Well, that means that it’s a relative, but it’s not like a brother, sister, it’s like a parent, sibling, it’s too far removed. So then they have to start building family trees and they can build backwards up to the great, great grandpa and then downwards. And so there’s a lot of people that are investigated, not as suspects, but as linked to suspects. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So all of a sudden, you might have police knocking on somebody’s door to say, “Could you give a confirmatory sample so that we can then try to figure out if you’re related to the person and if you are the brother whose family tree this is part of.” So I worry just potentially even more about the privacy and the respect for the non-suspects who are also implicated in these investigations than the suspect themselves. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In this story, we’re also hearing from someone who found her long lost family members through a 23andMe test. It seems like there’s a significant trade-off here. To find this part of yourself, you have to risk your privacy. If someone did choose to take an at-home DNA test, what precautions would you recommend? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Anya Prince:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So first I’d say like, absolutely, it’s a trade-off. I mean, as I’m sure many of you listeners know, every time we share data out there, whether it’s with our friend or individual or a company, we are making trade-offs about confidentiality and privacy. And I think it’s completely normal and rational trade-off to participate in something like 23andMe. Whether it’s to learn about health risks, whether it is to learn about family members, whether it’s to learn about your ancestry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m a really private person, so I haven’t made that trade-off, because that’s not something that feels comfortable for me. But I also, I’m not surprised that millions of people have made that trade-off. And for most people, it’s fine, right? They don’t have a privacy risk. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My hope, though, would be that law and policy catch up a little bit, right, where the data is more protected so that there can’t be misuse, right? Where we have more robust genetic anti-discrimination laws, where we have more structures in place for how and when law enforcement could access this data, and that we have rules about how companies that collect this data have to care for it, you know, as stewards of this data and not just have it be profit-making endeavor. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks so much for joining us and for just sharing all of this information. I’m gonna go delete everything from everything online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Trine, for one, was pretty freaked out about the 23andMe data breach, and then bankruptcy, and then sale. As she watched the headlines roll in, she decided to deactivate her account and permanently delete her data. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I got my info, I got win with my brothers and I really don’t need and now I really am concerned like who is this gonna go to now? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There were a few more distant family members that popped up as matches, but Trine wasn’t too pressed about connecting with them. Especially not through 23andMe.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> I’m like I’m fine with that. I don’t really need more, unless they want to come to us and gather. That’s good, but I don’t need to do it through this platform anymore. I think it’s hard for me not to have my little rose-colored glasses on, which is how I often view the world, especially now I really need them, because mine was so joyful. So yeah, I probably say yeah, take a beat, investigate the bejeebus out of whatever thing you think you’re gonna go through and do, you know, kind of thing. But for me, I mean, lucky. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Worth it for you? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, 100. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Despite learning that she is, in fact, Filipina and Irish, Trini still identifies as 100% Mexican. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I- Clearly raised Mexican, you know, have the heart of it. So I can’t un-Mexican myself.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She did have a small crisis when she renewed her driver’s license and had to decide whether to check the box for Hispanic. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Trine Gallegos:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Honestly, I cried for like two minutes. And then I was like, no? Question mark? Then I found Filipino and then I moved on because, you know, that’s just a form. You know, when I’m asked, I say I’m Mexican.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A DNA test can reveal a lot about our backgrounds, but ultimately, it can’t decide who we are. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, now let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s director of podcasts. Original music, including our theme song and credits by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our podcast operations manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by the Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, San Francisco, Northern California, Local. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, and I know it’s a podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to Donate.KQED.org/podcasts. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12055408/23andme-andgeneticprivacy",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11832",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_35194",
"news_22973",
"news_22844",
"news_2331",
"news_34569",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_2414",
"news_2125",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12055410",
"label": "source_news_12055408"
},
"news_12053843": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12053843",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12053843",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1756288804000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "teachers-strike-back-against-ai-cheating",
"title": "Teachers Strike Back Against AI Cheating",
"publishDate": 1756288804,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Teachers Strike Back Against AI Cheating | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cheating in school isn’t new. But with AI making it easier than ever, teachers face a new challenge: where to draw the line and how to make sure students are still learning. In this episode, we’ll take a look at three different approaches educators are adopting to deal with AI in their classrooms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">First, Morgan sits down with Max Spero, CEO and co-founder of the AI detection company Pangram Labs, to discuss how detection tools should, and should not, be used in the classroom. Then, we hear from KQED reporter Marlena Jackson Retondo about the return of the iconic “blue books,” and the benefits of “analog” learning. Finally, Morgan calls up her cousin, Jeremy Na, who happens to be an English teacher in San Jose. He explains how he adapted his teaching style to focus on the process of learning, rather than a final grade — and why his method has kept AI out of his classroom (for the most part).\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC8041204001\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jeremy Na, Bay Area-based educator\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.pangram.com/about-us\">Max Spero\u003c/a>, founder of Pangram Labs \u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/author/mjacksonretondo\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Marlena Jackson-Retondo\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, engagement producer and reporter for KQED\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/openai-chatgpt-ai-cheating-education-college-students-school.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> – James D. Walsh, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NYMag\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/64992/taking-exams-in-blue-books-its-back-to-help-curb-ai-use-and-rampant-cheating\">Taking Exams in Blue Books? They’re Back to Help Curb AI Use and Rampant Cheating\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> –\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Marlena Jackson Retondo\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003ci>KQED’s Mindshift\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.wsj.com/business/chatgpt-ai-cheating-college-blue-books-5e3014a6\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They Were Every Student’s Worst Nightmare. Now Blue Books Are Back. \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">– Ben Cohen, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Wall Street Journal \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What are your thoughts on, on generative AI? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Generative AI is a fancy autocomplete, in my opinion. Trusting it is no different than trusting a magic 8-ball. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jeremy Na is a Bay Area High School English teacher. He’s a great teacher, and I know this because he’s my older cousin, and he spent a lot of his teenage years at my parents’ dining table as my math tutor. Let’s just say I wasn’t the most cooperative student. One of the first hurdles of his teaching career was probably getting me to understand basic algebra. The second, getting me to actually sit down and do my math homework. And now, like many teachers, he faces another challenge: AI in the classroom. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When my students tell me a lot about how they trust AI answers and stuff like that, I reference the SpongeBob episode where, you know, everyone in Bikini Bottom is trusting a magic conch shell to give them answers and decide their life. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>SpongeBob SquarePants: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh magic conch shell, what do we need to do to get out of the kelp forest? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>SpongeBob SquarePants: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nothing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>SpongeBob SquarePants: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The shell has spoken! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think it’s a big scam. Or rather, I know it’s big scam because, you know, it just sucks up money and is burning the environment for nothing. That’s my personal view of generative AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So yeah, my cousin Jeremy, not a fan of AI. In recent years, the use of AI tools has been a major point of contention between students and teachers. Scroll through any social media platform and you’ll see students give tips for getting away with submitting AI essays. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I use ChatGPT, but this is the way to use ChatGPT and not get flagged for any plagiarism or anything like that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Teachers fretting about their students’ dependence on AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a nightmare that is destroying learning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then there are the students who don’t use AI but get dragged in anyway. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was falsely accused of using AI on my final paper last term, it was flagged as 60% AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In his nine years of teaching, my cousin Jeremy has seen his fair share of cheating attempts. His students have used ChatGBT since it launched about three years ago. But he quickly realized that his students were using it for more than just an academic shortcut. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They were asking me stuff like, Mr. Na, uh, how can I use AI to help me with this assignment? Or Mr. Na, you know, I was using AI the other day and it really helped me with X, Y, Z problem. At first, I thought these students were just kinda trolling cause like I thought to myself, there’s no way anyone would trust AI. This is the machines that like tell people to staple cheese to pizza to make it stick better. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Google AI actually recommended adding glue to pizza, but his point still stands. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But no, I realized soon enough that my students were like serious about trusting AI. And that’s when I realized, oh, my students, you know, they’ve fallen for the propaganda. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s still no consensus on the role of AI in education. Some teachers embrace it as a feature of their lesson plans. Others ban it from their classrooms entirely and blame AI for their students’ atrophied critical thinking skills. And at the center of this debate is a question that’s haunted educators throughout human history. What do we do about cheating? Now that everyone can carry little AI cheating machines in their pockets, AKA their phones, that debate has kicked into overdrive. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Today’s episode is a little different, because instead of following one thread, this internet rabbit hole will take us down a few different paths. We’re going to look at three different approaches to curbing AI cheating in school. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back when the internet was brand new, students suddenly had access to a virtually endless trove of information to copy and paste from. Academics needed a way to tell what was original and what was copied. So plagiarism detection was born. An entire industry dedicated to identifying and flagging stolen work. But with generative AI blowing up, checking for plagiarism isn’t enough. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">First up, a new tab. What’s up with AI detection? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To get into this, I called up Max Spero, co-founder and self-described chief slop janitor of Pangram Labs. Pangram is an AI detection tool that flags texts generated by all the major models like ChatGBT and Claude and Grok, and also detects AI-generated edits from tools like Grammarly. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It could be an essay, it could be a review, it could a social media post. And then so we help people tell you like, yeah, what’s AI and what’s human. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cleaning up the slop. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cleaning up the slop as they say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Slop is the colloquial term for that low-quality, AI-generated content flooding the internet. Pangram didn’t start out as an educational tool. Max said that the company’s first customers were actually websites trying to detect and delete fake reviews. Pangram offered a free trial version of the tool on its website. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then we were looking at the signups and we kept on seeing signups from like EDU addresses, people who are putting in what’s clearly student papers and people are doing this like at huge volumes. They’re just pasting in like dozens of papers a day. And then, so I think we were realizing like, hey, there’s a much bigger market here on this consumer side as well, where we can help teachers out because this is clearly a big need. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Pangram’s detection works by showing its model two writing samples. The first, written by a human, and the second, similar but AI-generated. They do this over and over and again. The model learns to recognize the way humans write, and distinguish it from AI trying to replicate it. That’s how certain sentence structures or words like “delve” and “rich cultural tapestry”, or even, my beloved em-dash, became associated with AI writing. Humans use all of those features in writing, but AI models overuse them. They’re predictable. There’s a misconception that students can bypass detection tools by paraphrasing AI-generated writing. That may have been the case a few years ago, but detection tools are getting better. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We found that you need to rewrite at least 30% to 40% of some text before it’ll come back as human written. So you really have to like rewrite a large portion of the text before you’re able to erase these signs of AI writing. At that point, you might as well just write your essay yourself. But in the end, like all of these tools, at Pangram and other AI detectors, we can still train on these, the outputs of these tools, so we can detect, not only does this look AI generated, but it also looks like it was run through a humanizer. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s a program that rewrites AI-generated text to sound more, well, human. And of course, humanizers use AI to do that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that’s even more clearly a sign of acting in bad faith. Like this is a clear indication that no, you didn’t just like misunderstand that you weren’t allowed to use ChatGPT, but like you actually were actively cheating here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not impossible to bypass AI detection, but Max said that many AI detectors, including Pangram, can still flag humanized text as AI. He added that since these students are often trying to take the path of least resistance, the threat of detection could be enough to deter cheating. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adding a little bit of friction here goes a long way to helping put down these guardrails and say like, okay, fine, you know, if it’s not really easy for me to just use AI to generate my assignment, I’ll just do it myself. It’s not that bad. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some teachers have tried to AI-proof their assignments by adding a random prompt in white text, like “mention bananas in every paragraph.” The human eye can’t see the white text on a white digital background. If a student copies and pastes it into ChatGPT, they’ll get a generated essay that has nothing to do with the actual assignment, but a lot to do with bananas. It’s a dead giveaway that they used AI to complete the paper. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s also some confusion over what detection scores mean. A score of 60% doesn’t mean that 60% of the essay is AI-generated, it’s a confidence score. It means that the detection tool is 60% certain that the text it analyzed is AI generated, which is pretty far from certain. That’s why students who wrote completely original papers have been accused of cheating. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">These AI-proofing hacks and the knee-jerk reaction to accuse students of using AI without hearing them out says a lot about the relationship between students and teachers right now. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think there’s a big problem in trust right now in education, especially because, um, the nature of it is so adversarial. I think like we really need to take a step back and realize that we have a shared goal. The goal is to get the student to learn. And I think a lot of this starts with like how we understand assignments. Like, teachers need to be very clear to students like, hey, these are the guardrails. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like you can use AI, for example, to do brainstorming or an outline, but don’t use AI to fully produce your assignment. Um, and similarly, once the student has like a very clear understanding of like, these are the guidelines, this is what I can and can’t do, um, then it’s easier for them to work together. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What’s your stance on teachers using Pangram to grade? Are AI detection tools like the end all be all? Can teachers rely on it completely? How do you best see Pangram being used in the grading process? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s like really only the start. It is best used as a smoke detector to tell you, hey, something’s wrong. I should look into what’s going on here. I don’t think it’s appropriate to say like, hey, this AI detector flagged your work as AI, so I’m gonna give you a zero and then just like move on. I think that’s, that’s lazy and that doesn’t really turn the opportunity into a teaching moment. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Detection tools are just one part of a holistic grading process. Max added that some teachers integrate AI detection into their classroom platforms so that students can check themselves before they turn in their assignments. But other teachers are taking a wildly different approach. Instead of leaning into detection, they’re going back to the olden days. We’ll dive into the return of handwriting after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re back. Let’s take a look at the next strategy teachers have employed to hold the line against AI. If you were in college before the pandemic started, you might remember this vintage classic. Okay, new tab. Back to blue books. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My colleague, Marlena Jackson-Retondo, is joining us for this part of our deep dive. Marlena has been reporting on AI and K through 12 education for MindShift, another KQED podcast about the future of learning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I guess now we can say that blue books are an old-fashioned, in quotes, tool that, um, a lot of professors and high school teachers use to test students. And they’re used for a lot midterms and finals, and are an alternative to now what we know as, you know, digital testing tools. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve used blue books. You’ve used blue books. I feel like it wasn’t that long ago that we were using blue books. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re not that old. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Blue books are exactly what they sound like. They’re little booklets with a baby blue cover and lined paper. They’ve been around since the 1920s and they’ve been a staple of written exams in high school and college. I still remember the absolute horror I felt my junior year of college when my pen exploded just as I finished my constitutional law final and I had to turn in a blue book covered in purple ink. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But blue books were phased out when the pandemic shut down schools in 2020. Everything involved in learning, from lessons to homework to exams, took place online. And then, late last year, Marlena saw a viral post from Jason Coupe, a professor in Atlanta. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And he was talking about using blue books, bringing them back to the classroom for his first midterm of that school year. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk about his reasoning behind moving to blue books? How did other teachers react to that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He and a couple other professors in his department got together and discussed ways to mitigate cheating, use of AI, and also to reengage their students. When we spoke last year, there was a lot of discussion about really getting students to think on their feet, think critically, respond to questions in ways that they might in the real world. And he wasn’t seeing a lot of that in digital exams. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So this wasn’t just about cheating. It wasn’t just about AI. There was also that sense of reconnecting the students to the coursework. And it was a learning curve for a lot of students, um, as I’ve heard from multiple professors, but it went well, and a lot of folks will continue to, to use these blue books. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By 2024, you know, this is a generation of students that have spent at least four years, you know, learning digitally in some capacity. How did they respond to having to go back to handwriting? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, so a lot of Coupe’s students didn’t know what a blue book was. They had never taken a handwritten exam. They didn’t what to do with the blue book, where to write their name. So he had to teach them. And I remember him saying that it reminded him of his time in teaching in elementary school, um, having to really break down certain processes for students. But, you know, they learned, they took the exam by hand, and he and other professors noticed a difference right away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aside from deterring cheating, how else does prioritizing handwritten notes impact learning? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The research on handwriting is actually really interesting. I spoke with Sophia Vinci-Booher out of Vanderbilt University. She talked to me about handwriting in a really interesting way in that it creates these neural connections to what you’re learning. And this is what she called the visual motor learning system. So it’s combining these two systems, the motor system of handwriting and the visuals of learning something that might be written on the board or a PowerPoint, and it’s combining them and it’s reinforcing what you’re learning when you’re writing by hand. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s been shown that the mode of taking notes, when it correlates with the mode of having to recall that information, like taking an exam. When those modes are synced, so let’s say there’s a student who takes notes by hand, and then they have to go and take an exam on a blue book, the recall is better that way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So essentially, students are “learning more”, that’s in big quotes, because obviously there are other factors involved in learning. But there’s better learning happening when the mode of note taking and recalling those notes is the same. So, you know, I think there’s a lot more research to look at and to be done, but there are certain benefits to writing by hand. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And blue books are hot again. Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal reported that blue book sales were up more than 30% at Texas A&M University and almost 50% at the University of Florida. At UC Berkeley, blue book sales shot up 80% over the past two years. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Of course, this return to our roots has its limits. Blue books are great for exams, but they’re not a realistic option for longer assignments like research papers. And neither approach we’ve covered so far, AI detection and blue books, addresses the core reasons students cheat. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s look at one final strategy in a new tab. The testmaxxing problem. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s go back to my cousin, Jeremy, who’s a high school English teacher in the Bay Area. We both grew up in New York City and went to very academically rigorous public high schools. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The standards of the time, this was in, you know, the early 2000s, was very much, let’s call it testmaxxing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In gaming, there’s this practice called minmaxxing — maximizing your stats with a minimal amount of effort. On the internet, adding maxing to the end of any word is kind of like a joke about optimizing. So by test maxing, Jeremy is referring to the way that students are encouraged to shape their whole approach to school around succeeding on tests instead of actually learning. He believes that’s the reason students cheat. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, when I became a teacher, I set out to make sure that like no one else has that same experience as I did that, you know, students don’t have this miserable high school experience where they’re treated like cattle, basically. Like you gotta you gotta get those numbers up. Your entire worth is decided by these numbers. Our society has placed a lot of importance on the end result of education rather than like education itself. What I mean by that is it’s more important what grade you get on the test than what you learned through the process before taking the test. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To counter the pressure of testmaxxing, Jeremy does things differently in his classroom. He never assigns homework. All the work, including reading and writing assignments, is done in the classroom. He does assign long-term projects, like essays, but he has his own way of AI-proofing them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This methodology, this pedagogy that I’ve developed is developed from shifting priorities away from the end result over into focusing on the process, right? So the fact that it’s inconvenient to use AI was just kind of like a happy little bonus. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He really does make it inconvenient to cheat in his classes. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Now, I don’t see a lot of AI usage. It’s always like one or two out of my 150 students. And the reason I don’t see a lof of AI usage is because when we’re doing it, a long-term assignment like an essay, I make sure to break down that assignment into as many granular pieces as possible. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So for example, with my freshmen, ninth graders, when we were doing an essay I’ll often walk them through, not only like how to construct each paragraph, but how to construct like the parts of each paragraph. Like sometimes we’ll go sentence by sentence. In that scenario it would be kind of absurd to use AI, right? Because like Mr. Na is telling you, okay, write one sentence about your opinion on this part of the book, right. Why, why would you go ask Grok or ChatGPT opinion about the book when you can just write your own opinion in one sentence. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is your classroom AI policy, even though, you know, you personally despise AI? Like do you use a detection tool for your students? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t use detection tools at all. I would not trust AI to tell me what the weather is. Why would I trust it to read student reports and, you know, analyze them? That’s absurd. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Despite his evident disdain for generative AI, my cousin doesn’t have the same zero tolerance policy that a lot of other teachers have. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t explicitly call out their paper for being AI. But what I will do is, you know, I’ll sit with them and be like, “You know, this, this paper’s got a lot of problems. This assignment that you wrote has lots of problems, like it’s, it’s overflowing with problems. I got to sit you down here and we got to talk for like 15 minutes. Sentence by sentence and deconstruct this essay to fix it.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like in that scenario, students do learn like what’s wrong with using AI. Conceivably, they could learn to cheat better this way, but in my view, what they’re actually learning is that the assignment I’m asking them to do is not something outside of their capabilities. So yes, they are learning what the flaws of AI are, but they’re also learning that they are more capable than they might think. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Telling a teenager not to do something never works. Yeah. If you want a teenager to do something, right? If you want that horse to drink that water, you gotta make the water appealing. You gotta explain why it’s in their best interests not to so, right? They gotta come to that conclusion on their own. The downside is that this process takes a lot of time. So yes, I don’t get through many bucks throughout the school year, but I feel like the quality of the work and the learning that students receive is a lot better for that sacrifice. And I’m willing, I’m, I am willing to make that sacrifice \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like on Reddit, I’m always seeing teachers and professors talk about the ways that they AI-proof their assignments, like adding white text to trip up the prompts or splitting up instructions into multiple documents so it’s really inconvenient to give it to ChatGPT. Have you and your colleagues tried any of these? What do you think about these, like, AI-proofing tricks? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think getting into a arms race with AI is unhelpful. So coming up with different ways to detect AI, and then AI comes up with ways of getting around that, you know, this arms race that you’re describing, I don’t see a point to engaging with it. If you want students to stop using AI, you got to address the core issue, right, rather than just constantly dealing with these symptoms like some absurd game of whack-a-mole. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">As you might be able to tell, Jeremy feels pretty strongly about this. He believes that putting so much value on the final product, whether a final paper or a final test score, deprioritizes actual learning, overwhelms students, and incentivizes cheating. Still, he has to teach within the system that values end results. His students still have to take California’s standardized tests. But he said that prepping them for the annual state assessments doesn’t take that much time. For the rest of the school year, he can focus on breaking down assignments and, through that, developing their critical thinking skills. It’s not that grades don’t matter, but by focusing on actual learning, students feel less pressure to cheat. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everyone is telling them to participate in this rat race, that they have to. That they have no choice but to participate in this rat race to climb to the top, you know. If they are learning, right? I tell students not to deride all of their self-worth from the numbers they get at school. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It seems like the larger question we’re trying to answer throughout the episode is how do you maintain that sense of trust between students and teachers when generative AI tools makes cheating so easy? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t think, say that like trust between student and teacher has eroded. I think it’s more that teachers are becoming more suspicious overall because the tools that they’ve developed in the past no longer work. Students using AI is not a sign of, I don’t know, like moral degeneracy, and the youth of today are worse than they have been in the past, no. But you know, students are cheating nowadays, just like students would have cheated back when I was in high school or when my parents were in high score when my grandparents were in high school. It’s not a sign of moral decay. It’s a sign of, I don’t know, of the downfall of Western civilization or nothing like that. It’s just a new chapter in the book that’s been written forever. Cheating. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not just teachers trying to curb their students’ use of AI. Students are also upset with teachers for using ChatGPT to write lesson plans. In a New York Times report this year, students complained about their professors cheating them out of their tuition money, because in a way, it was ChatGpT teaching them. These issues have existed in education long before generative AI tools did. The existence and widespread use of AI just magnified them. Including this adversarial relationship between students and teachers. But in this scenario, teachers can set an example. If they don’t use AI, then maybe students won’t feel like they need to, either. Okay, now let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This episode was produced by Maya Cueva and edited by Chris Hambrick. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Jen Chien, who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Our audio engineer is Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsay is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ok, and I know it’s podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives, and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. Don’t forget to drop a comment and tell your friends, too. Or even your enemies! Or… frenemies? Your support is so important, especially in these unprecedented times. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to donate dot KQED.org/podcasts! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Also! We want to hear from you! Email us CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram @CloseAllTabsPod. Or TikTok @CloseAllTabs. And join our Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Morgan walks us through three different approaches educators are adopting to deal with AI in their classrooms.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1756274111,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 103,
"wordCount": 5313
},
"headData": {
"title": "Teachers Strike Back Against AI Cheating | KQED",
"description": "Cheating in school isn’t new. But with AI making it easier than ever, teachers face a new challenge: where to draw the line, and how to make sure students are still learning. In this episode, we’ll take a look at three different approaches educators are adopting to deal with AI in their classrooms.First, Morgan sits down with Max Spero, founder of the AI detection company Pangram Labs, to discuss how detection tools should — and should not — be used in the classroom. Then, we hear from KQED reporter Marlena Jackson Retondo about the return of the iconic “blue books,” and the benefits of “analog” learning. Finally, Morgan calls up her cousin, Jeremy Na, who happens to be an English teacher in San Jose. He explains how he adapted his teaching style to focus on the process of learning, rather than a final grade — and why his method has kept AI out of his classroom (for the most part).",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "Cheating in school isn’t new. But with AI making it easier than ever, teachers face a new challenge: where to draw the line, and how to make sure students are still learning. In this episode, we’ll take a look at three different approaches educators are adopting to deal with AI in their classrooms.First, Morgan sits down with Max Spero, founder of the AI detection company Pangram Labs, to discuss how detection tools should — and should not — be used in the classroom. Then, we hear from KQED reporter Marlena Jackson Retondo about the return of the iconic “blue books,” and the benefits of “analog” learning. Finally, Morgan calls up her cousin, Jeremy Na, who happens to be an English teacher in San Jose. He explains how he adapted his teaching style to focus on the process of learning, rather than a final grade — and why his method has kept AI out of his classroom (for the most part).",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Teachers Strike Back Against AI Cheating",
"datePublished": "2025-08-27T03:00:04-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-08-26T22:55:11-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC8041204001.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12053843/teachers-strike-back-against-ai-cheating",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cheating in school isn’t new. But with AI making it easier than ever, teachers face a new challenge: where to draw the line and how to make sure students are still learning. In this episode, we’ll take a look at three different approaches educators are adopting to deal with AI in their classrooms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">First, Morgan sits down with Max Spero, CEO and co-founder of the AI detection company Pangram Labs, to discuss how detection tools should, and should not, be used in the classroom. Then, we hear from KQED reporter Marlena Jackson Retondo about the return of the iconic “blue books,” and the benefits of “analog” learning. Finally, Morgan calls up her cousin, Jeremy Na, who happens to be an English teacher in San Jose. He explains how he adapted his teaching style to focus on the process of learning, rather than a final grade — and why his method has kept AI out of his classroom (for the most part).\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC8041204001\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jeremy Na, Bay Area-based educator\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.pangram.com/about-us\">Max Spero\u003c/a>, founder of Pangram Labs \u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/author/mjacksonretondo\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Marlena Jackson-Retondo\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, engagement producer and reporter for KQED\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://nymag.com/intelligencer/article/openai-chatgpt-ai-cheating-education-college-students-school.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everyone Is Cheating Their Way Through College\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> – James D. Walsh, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NYMag\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.kqed.org/mindshift/64992/taking-exams-in-blue-books-its-back-to-help-curb-ai-use-and-rampant-cheating\">Taking Exams in Blue Books? They’re Back to Help Curb AI Use and Rampant Cheating\u003c/a>\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> –\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Marlena Jackson Retondo\u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, \u003ci>KQED’s Mindshift\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.wsj.com/business/chatgpt-ai-cheating-college-blue-books-5e3014a6\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They Were Every Student’s Worst Nightmare. Now Blue Books Are Back. \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">– Ben Cohen, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Wall Street Journal \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What are your thoughts on, on generative AI? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Generative AI is a fancy autocomplete, in my opinion. Trusting it is no different than trusting a magic 8-ball. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jeremy Na is a Bay Area High School English teacher. He’s a great teacher, and I know this because he’s my older cousin, and he spent a lot of his teenage years at my parents’ dining table as my math tutor. Let’s just say I wasn’t the most cooperative student. One of the first hurdles of his teaching career was probably getting me to understand basic algebra. The second, getting me to actually sit down and do my math homework. And now, like many teachers, he faces another challenge: AI in the classroom. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When my students tell me a lot about how they trust AI answers and stuff like that, I reference the SpongeBob episode where, you know, everyone in Bikini Bottom is trusting a magic conch shell to give them answers and decide their life. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>SpongeBob SquarePants: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Oh magic conch shell, what do we need to do to get out of the kelp forest? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>SpongeBob SquarePants: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nothing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>SpongeBob SquarePants: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The shell has spoken! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think it’s a big scam. Or rather, I know it’s big scam because, you know, it just sucks up money and is burning the environment for nothing. That’s my personal view of generative AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So yeah, my cousin Jeremy, not a fan of AI. In recent years, the use of AI tools has been a major point of contention between students and teachers. Scroll through any social media platform and you’ll see students give tips for getting away with submitting AI essays. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I use ChatGPT, but this is the way to use ChatGPT and not get flagged for any plagiarism or anything like that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Teachers fretting about their students’ dependence on AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a nightmare that is destroying learning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And then there are the students who don’t use AI but get dragged in anyway. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was falsely accused of using AI on my final paper last term, it was flagged as 60% AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In his nine years of teaching, my cousin Jeremy has seen his fair share of cheating attempts. His students have used ChatGBT since it launched about three years ago. But he quickly realized that his students were using it for more than just an academic shortcut. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They were asking me stuff like, Mr. Na, uh, how can I use AI to help me with this assignment? Or Mr. Na, you know, I was using AI the other day and it really helped me with X, Y, Z problem. At first, I thought these students were just kinda trolling cause like I thought to myself, there’s no way anyone would trust AI. This is the machines that like tell people to staple cheese to pizza to make it stick better. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Google AI actually recommended adding glue to pizza, but his point still stands. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But no, I realized soon enough that my students were like serious about trusting AI. And that’s when I realized, oh, my students, you know, they’ve fallen for the propaganda. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s still no consensus on the role of AI in education. Some teachers embrace it as a feature of their lesson plans. Others ban it from their classrooms entirely and blame AI for their students’ atrophied critical thinking skills. And at the center of this debate is a question that’s haunted educators throughout human history. What do we do about cheating? Now that everyone can carry little AI cheating machines in their pockets, AKA their phones, that debate has kicked into overdrive. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Today’s episode is a little different, because instead of following one thread, this internet rabbit hole will take us down a few different paths. We’re going to look at three different approaches to curbing AI cheating in school. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Back when the internet was brand new, students suddenly had access to a virtually endless trove of information to copy and paste from. Academics needed a way to tell what was original and what was copied. So plagiarism detection was born. An entire industry dedicated to identifying and flagging stolen work. But with generative AI blowing up, checking for plagiarism isn’t enough. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">First up, a new tab. What’s up with AI detection? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To get into this, I called up Max Spero, co-founder and self-described chief slop janitor of Pangram Labs. Pangram is an AI detection tool that flags texts generated by all the major models like ChatGBT and Claude and Grok, and also detects AI-generated edits from tools like Grammarly. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It could be an essay, it could be a review, it could a social media post. And then so we help people tell you like, yeah, what’s AI and what’s human. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cleaning up the slop. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cleaning up the slop as they say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Slop is the colloquial term for that low-quality, AI-generated content flooding the internet. Pangram didn’t start out as an educational tool. Max said that the company’s first customers were actually websites trying to detect and delete fake reviews. Pangram offered a free trial version of the tool on its website. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then we were looking at the signups and we kept on seeing signups from like EDU addresses, people who are putting in what’s clearly student papers and people are doing this like at huge volumes. They’re just pasting in like dozens of papers a day. And then, so I think we were realizing like, hey, there’s a much bigger market here on this consumer side as well, where we can help teachers out because this is clearly a big need. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Pangram’s detection works by showing its model two writing samples. The first, written by a human, and the second, similar but AI-generated. They do this over and over and again. The model learns to recognize the way humans write, and distinguish it from AI trying to replicate it. That’s how certain sentence structures or words like “delve” and “rich cultural tapestry”, or even, my beloved em-dash, became associated with AI writing. Humans use all of those features in writing, but AI models overuse them. They’re predictable. There’s a misconception that students can bypass detection tools by paraphrasing AI-generated writing. That may have been the case a few years ago, but detection tools are getting better. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We found that you need to rewrite at least 30% to 40% of some text before it’ll come back as human written. So you really have to like rewrite a large portion of the text before you’re able to erase these signs of AI writing. At that point, you might as well just write your essay yourself. But in the end, like all of these tools, at Pangram and other AI detectors, we can still train on these, the outputs of these tools, so we can detect, not only does this look AI generated, but it also looks like it was run through a humanizer. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s a program that rewrites AI-generated text to sound more, well, human. And of course, humanizers use AI to do that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that’s even more clearly a sign of acting in bad faith. Like this is a clear indication that no, you didn’t just like misunderstand that you weren’t allowed to use ChatGPT, but like you actually were actively cheating here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not impossible to bypass AI detection, but Max said that many AI detectors, including Pangram, can still flag humanized text as AI. He added that since these students are often trying to take the path of least resistance, the threat of detection could be enough to deter cheating. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adding a little bit of friction here goes a long way to helping put down these guardrails and say like, okay, fine, you know, if it’s not really easy for me to just use AI to generate my assignment, I’ll just do it myself. It’s not that bad. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some teachers have tried to AI-proof their assignments by adding a random prompt in white text, like “mention bananas in every paragraph.” The human eye can’t see the white text on a white digital background. If a student copies and pastes it into ChatGPT, they’ll get a generated essay that has nothing to do with the actual assignment, but a lot to do with bananas. It’s a dead giveaway that they used AI to complete the paper. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s also some confusion over what detection scores mean. A score of 60% doesn’t mean that 60% of the essay is AI-generated, it’s a confidence score. It means that the detection tool is 60% certain that the text it analyzed is AI generated, which is pretty far from certain. That’s why students who wrote completely original papers have been accused of cheating. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">These AI-proofing hacks and the knee-jerk reaction to accuse students of using AI without hearing them out says a lot about the relationship between students and teachers right now. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think there’s a big problem in trust right now in education, especially because, um, the nature of it is so adversarial. I think like we really need to take a step back and realize that we have a shared goal. The goal is to get the student to learn. And I think a lot of this starts with like how we understand assignments. Like, teachers need to be very clear to students like, hey, these are the guardrails. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like you can use AI, for example, to do brainstorming or an outline, but don’t use AI to fully produce your assignment. Um, and similarly, once the student has like a very clear understanding of like, these are the guidelines, this is what I can and can’t do, um, then it’s easier for them to work together. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What’s your stance on teachers using Pangram to grade? Are AI detection tools like the end all be all? Can teachers rely on it completely? How do you best see Pangram being used in the grading process? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Max Spero:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s like really only the start. It is best used as a smoke detector to tell you, hey, something’s wrong. I should look into what’s going on here. I don’t think it’s appropriate to say like, hey, this AI detector flagged your work as AI, so I’m gonna give you a zero and then just like move on. I think that’s, that’s lazy and that doesn’t really turn the opportunity into a teaching moment. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Detection tools are just one part of a holistic grading process. Max added that some teachers integrate AI detection into their classroom platforms so that students can check themselves before they turn in their assignments. But other teachers are taking a wildly different approach. Instead of leaning into detection, they’re going back to the olden days. We’ll dive into the return of handwriting after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re back. Let’s take a look at the next strategy teachers have employed to hold the line against AI. If you were in college before the pandemic started, you might remember this vintage classic. Okay, new tab. Back to blue books. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My colleague, Marlena Jackson-Retondo, is joining us for this part of our deep dive. Marlena has been reporting on AI and K through 12 education for MindShift, another KQED podcast about the future of learning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I guess now we can say that blue books are an old-fashioned, in quotes, tool that, um, a lot of professors and high school teachers use to test students. And they’re used for a lot midterms and finals, and are an alternative to now what we know as, you know, digital testing tools. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve used blue books. You’ve used blue books. I feel like it wasn’t that long ago that we were using blue books. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re not that old. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Blue books are exactly what they sound like. They’re little booklets with a baby blue cover and lined paper. They’ve been around since the 1920s and they’ve been a staple of written exams in high school and college. I still remember the absolute horror I felt my junior year of college when my pen exploded just as I finished my constitutional law final and I had to turn in a blue book covered in purple ink. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But blue books were phased out when the pandemic shut down schools in 2020. Everything involved in learning, from lessons to homework to exams, took place online. And then, late last year, Marlena saw a viral post from Jason Coupe, a professor in Atlanta. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And he was talking about using blue books, bringing them back to the classroom for his first midterm of that school year. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk about his reasoning behind moving to blue books? How did other teachers react to that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He and a couple other professors in his department got together and discussed ways to mitigate cheating, use of AI, and also to reengage their students. When we spoke last year, there was a lot of discussion about really getting students to think on their feet, think critically, respond to questions in ways that they might in the real world. And he wasn’t seeing a lot of that in digital exams. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So this wasn’t just about cheating. It wasn’t just about AI. There was also that sense of reconnecting the students to the coursework. And it was a learning curve for a lot of students, um, as I’ve heard from multiple professors, but it went well, and a lot of folks will continue to, to use these blue books. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By 2024, you know, this is a generation of students that have spent at least four years, you know, learning digitally in some capacity. How did they respond to having to go back to handwriting? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, so a lot of Coupe’s students didn’t know what a blue book was. They had never taken a handwritten exam. They didn’t what to do with the blue book, where to write their name. So he had to teach them. And I remember him saying that it reminded him of his time in teaching in elementary school, um, having to really break down certain processes for students. But, you know, they learned, they took the exam by hand, and he and other professors noticed a difference right away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aside from deterring cheating, how else does prioritizing handwritten notes impact learning? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Marlena Jackson-Retondo:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The research on handwriting is actually really interesting. I spoke with Sophia Vinci-Booher out of Vanderbilt University. She talked to me about handwriting in a really interesting way in that it creates these neural connections to what you’re learning. And this is what she called the visual motor learning system. So it’s combining these two systems, the motor system of handwriting and the visuals of learning something that might be written on the board or a PowerPoint, and it’s combining them and it’s reinforcing what you’re learning when you’re writing by hand. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s been shown that the mode of taking notes, when it correlates with the mode of having to recall that information, like taking an exam. When those modes are synced, so let’s say there’s a student who takes notes by hand, and then they have to go and take an exam on a blue book, the recall is better that way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So essentially, students are “learning more”, that’s in big quotes, because obviously there are other factors involved in learning. But there’s better learning happening when the mode of note taking and recalling those notes is the same. So, you know, I think there’s a lot more research to look at and to be done, but there are certain benefits to writing by hand. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And blue books are hot again. Earlier this year, The Wall Street Journal reported that blue book sales were up more than 30% at Texas A&M University and almost 50% at the University of Florida. At UC Berkeley, blue book sales shot up 80% over the past two years. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Of course, this return to our roots has its limits. Blue books are great for exams, but they’re not a realistic option for longer assignments like research papers. And neither approach we’ve covered so far, AI detection and blue books, addresses the core reasons students cheat. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s look at one final strategy in a new tab. The testmaxxing problem. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s go back to my cousin, Jeremy, who’s a high school English teacher in the Bay Area. We both grew up in New York City and went to very academically rigorous public high schools. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The standards of the time, this was in, you know, the early 2000s, was very much, let’s call it testmaxxing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In gaming, there’s this practice called minmaxxing — maximizing your stats with a minimal amount of effort. On the internet, adding maxing to the end of any word is kind of like a joke about optimizing. So by test maxing, Jeremy is referring to the way that students are encouraged to shape their whole approach to school around succeeding on tests instead of actually learning. He believes that’s the reason students cheat. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, when I became a teacher, I set out to make sure that like no one else has that same experience as I did that, you know, students don’t have this miserable high school experience where they’re treated like cattle, basically. Like you gotta you gotta get those numbers up. Your entire worth is decided by these numbers. Our society has placed a lot of importance on the end result of education rather than like education itself. What I mean by that is it’s more important what grade you get on the test than what you learned through the process before taking the test. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To counter the pressure of testmaxxing, Jeremy does things differently in his classroom. He never assigns homework. All the work, including reading and writing assignments, is done in the classroom. He does assign long-term projects, like essays, but he has his own way of AI-proofing them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This methodology, this pedagogy that I’ve developed is developed from shifting priorities away from the end result over into focusing on the process, right? So the fact that it’s inconvenient to use AI was just kind of like a happy little bonus. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He really does make it inconvenient to cheat in his classes. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Now, I don’t see a lot of AI usage. It’s always like one or two out of my 150 students. And the reason I don’t see a lof of AI usage is because when we’re doing it, a long-term assignment like an essay, I make sure to break down that assignment into as many granular pieces as possible. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So for example, with my freshmen, ninth graders, when we were doing an essay I’ll often walk them through, not only like how to construct each paragraph, but how to construct like the parts of each paragraph. Like sometimes we’ll go sentence by sentence. In that scenario it would be kind of absurd to use AI, right? Because like Mr. Na is telling you, okay, write one sentence about your opinion on this part of the book, right. Why, why would you go ask Grok or ChatGPT opinion about the book when you can just write your own opinion in one sentence. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is your classroom AI policy, even though, you know, you personally despise AI? Like do you use a detection tool for your students? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t use detection tools at all. I would not trust AI to tell me what the weather is. Why would I trust it to read student reports and, you know, analyze them? That’s absurd. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Despite his evident disdain for generative AI, my cousin doesn’t have the same zero tolerance policy that a lot of other teachers have. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t explicitly call out their paper for being AI. But what I will do is, you know, I’ll sit with them and be like, “You know, this, this paper’s got a lot of problems. This assignment that you wrote has lots of problems, like it’s, it’s overflowing with problems. I got to sit you down here and we got to talk for like 15 minutes. Sentence by sentence and deconstruct this essay to fix it.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like in that scenario, students do learn like what’s wrong with using AI. Conceivably, they could learn to cheat better this way, but in my view, what they’re actually learning is that the assignment I’m asking them to do is not something outside of their capabilities. So yes, they are learning what the flaws of AI are, but they’re also learning that they are more capable than they might think. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Telling a teenager not to do something never works. Yeah. If you want a teenager to do something, right? If you want that horse to drink that water, you gotta make the water appealing. You gotta explain why it’s in their best interests not to so, right? They gotta come to that conclusion on their own. The downside is that this process takes a lot of time. So yes, I don’t get through many bucks throughout the school year, but I feel like the quality of the work and the learning that students receive is a lot better for that sacrifice. And I’m willing, I’m, I am willing to make that sacrifice \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like on Reddit, I’m always seeing teachers and professors talk about the ways that they AI-proof their assignments, like adding white text to trip up the prompts or splitting up instructions into multiple documents so it’s really inconvenient to give it to ChatGPT. Have you and your colleagues tried any of these? What do you think about these, like, AI-proofing tricks? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think getting into a arms race with AI is unhelpful. So coming up with different ways to detect AI, and then AI comes up with ways of getting around that, you know, this arms race that you’re describing, I don’t see a point to engaging with it. If you want students to stop using AI, you got to address the core issue, right, rather than just constantly dealing with these symptoms like some absurd game of whack-a-mole. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">As you might be able to tell, Jeremy feels pretty strongly about this. He believes that putting so much value on the final product, whether a final paper or a final test score, deprioritizes actual learning, overwhelms students, and incentivizes cheating. Still, he has to teach within the system that values end results. His students still have to take California’s standardized tests. But he said that prepping them for the annual state assessments doesn’t take that much time. For the rest of the school year, he can focus on breaking down assignments and, through that, developing their critical thinking skills. It’s not that grades don’t matter, but by focusing on actual learning, students feel less pressure to cheat. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everyone is telling them to participate in this rat race, that they have to. That they have no choice but to participate in this rat race to climb to the top, you know. If they are learning, right? I tell students not to deride all of their self-worth from the numbers they get at school. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It seems like the larger question we’re trying to answer throughout the episode is how do you maintain that sense of trust between students and teachers when generative AI tools makes cheating so easy? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Jeremy Na:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I don’t think, say that like trust between student and teacher has eroded. I think it’s more that teachers are becoming more suspicious overall because the tools that they’ve developed in the past no longer work. Students using AI is not a sign of, I don’t know, like moral degeneracy, and the youth of today are worse than they have been in the past, no. But you know, students are cheating nowadays, just like students would have cheated back when I was in high school or when my parents were in high score when my grandparents were in high school. It’s not a sign of moral decay. It’s a sign of, I don’t know, of the downfall of Western civilization or nothing like that. It’s just a new chapter in the book that’s been written forever. Cheating. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s not just teachers trying to curb their students’ use of AI. Students are also upset with teachers for using ChatGPT to write lesson plans. In a New York Times report this year, students complained about their professors cheating them out of their tuition money, because in a way, it was ChatGpT teaching them. These issues have existed in education long before generative AI tools did. The existence and widespread use of AI just magnified them. Including this adversarial relationship between students and teachers. But in this scenario, teachers can set an example. If they don’t use AI, then maybe students won’t feel like they need to, either. Okay, now let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This episode was produced by Maya Cueva and edited by Chris Hambrick. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Jen Chien, who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Our audio engineer is Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsay is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ok, and I know it’s podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives, and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. Don’t forget to drop a comment and tell your friends, too. Or even your enemies! Or… frenemies? Your support is so important, especially in these unprecedented times. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to donate dot KQED.org/podcasts! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Also! We want to hear from you! Email us CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram @CloseAllTabsPod. Or TikTok @CloseAllTabs. And join our Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12053843/teachers-strike-back-against-ai-cheating",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11832",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_25184",
"news_34755",
"news_20013",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_3457",
"news_2044",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12053846",
"label": "source_news_12053843"
},
"news_12052900": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12052900",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12052900",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1755684023000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "before-chatgpt-there-were-shadow-scholars",
"title": "Before ChatGPT, There Were 'Shadow Scholars'",
"publishDate": 1755684023,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Before ChatGPT, There Were ‘Shadow Scholars’ | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thousands of writers in Kenya make their living ghostwriting academic papers for wealthy Western students. It’s an industry known as “contract cheating” or “essay mills,” and is the subject of a new documentary, “The Shadow Scholars.” Directed by Eloise King, the film follows Kenyan-born Oxford Professor Patricia Kingori as she investigates this hidden industry and seeks to understand the essay writers working in the shadows of the educational system. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Morgan talks with Patricia and Eloise about the world of academic cheating, and how these writers are adapting to a world in which AI-generated essays are just a click away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC1401351139\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.some.ox.ac.uk/our-people/patricia-kingori/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Patricia Kingori\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, professor of global health ethics at the University of Oxford\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/challenge/?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.instagram.com%2Felloweezee%2F%3Fhl%3Den%26__coig_challenged%3D1#\">Eloise King\u003c/a>, director of “The Shadow Scholars”\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLZCTERhImw\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Shadow Scholars \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Directed by Eloise King \u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354713537_Kenya's_Fake_Essay_Writers_and_the_Light_they_Shine_on_Assumptions_of_Shadows_in_Knowledge_Production/citation/download\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kenya’s “Fake Essay” Writers and the Light they Shine on Assumptions of Shadows in Knowledge Production\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Patricia Kingori, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Journal of African Cultural Studies \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/ghostwriting-essays-american-college-students-lucrative-profession-kenya-a9096461.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How writing essays for American students has become a lucrative profession overseas\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Farah Stockman, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Independent \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereknewton/2025/05/14/georgia-bans-commercial-cheating-services/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Georgia Bans Commercial Cheating Services\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Derek Newton, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Forbes \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.fastcompany.com/90951343/ai-essays-advertising-on-meta-and-tiktok\">Companies that use AI to help you cheat at school are thriving on TikTok and Meta\u003c/a> — Chris Stokel-Walker, \u003ci>Fast Company\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Imagine you’re a college student. The end of the semester is just around the corner. It’s the middle of finals week and you have to study for an exam, finish a presentation and turn in a research paper all within the next 12 hours. Unfortunately, you’ve been procrastinating and you only have time to finish two of those three things. You could use a tool like Chat GPT, but you don’t wanna get caught using AI. So you open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the search bar, you type, essay… writer… fast. Enter. Dozens of results pop up. Websites with generic-sounding names, but sleek, friendly designs. They promise high-quality, custom essays delivered in days, or even hours. All you have to do is run through a few drop-down menus and pick what you need, and then enter your credit card number. You’ve just stepped into an industry known as “contract cheating,” better known as essay mills. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s the subject of a new documentary, The Shadow Scholars, which just had its North American premiere at Tribeca Film Festival. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>The Shadow Scholars Trailer: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ve all grown up being told that education empowers us. And if you study at school, then you’re going to get the rewards. I’m going to shine a light on the world’s billion-dollar secret. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It looks at who the people are on the other side of that screen. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One day I was invited to go along to a lecture at the Oxford Internet Institute and they were talking about these online laborers. And then they started talking about different parts of the world and where different people in different parts of the worlds use the internet for work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Patricia Kingori, a Kenyan-born UK-based sociologist. In 2021, she became the youngest Black professor at the University of Oxford. She’s also one of the main subjects of the film. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So then they described Kenya and said, you know, there is this writing and translation work, which is a kind of euphemism for the fake essay industry. And I just became really interested in, well, who are these people? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This topic is personal for Patricia. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think if you have had your thesis stolen, as I have had the ideas from my thesis stolen, you immediately start to believe that an industry where people do benefit from the intellect of others exists, right? I think really allowed me to start from a presumption of the fact that they exist rather than I think where many people have not had this experience might start, which is, well, how can that be? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just after attending the lecture, Patricia caught up with filmmaker Eloise King, who ended up directing the documentary. They had known each other for years, and Patricia casually mentioned the so-called fake essay industry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My immediate reaction was how do real people write fake essays? And I was immediately obsessed. I think one of the things that we share is a kind of an inquisitiveness that goes really deep once it’s sort of implanted. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, Eloise and Patricia, dug deeper. What they found was a booming, but mostly hidden industry of writers centered in Kenya, who are paid to produce academic work for others. Patricia wrote about it in 2021 in the Journal of African Culture Studies. The name “shadow scholars” comes from author Dave Tomar, who wrote about his own experience as an academic ghostwriter in his 2012 memoir. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The film, “The Shadow Scholars”, is less about the ethics of cheating and more about the unseen labor involved. The documentary focuses on the shadow scholars based in Kenya, which is a major hub for the fake essay industry. They’re often hired by students in the US, the UK, and Australia. Here’s Patricia in the film. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So of all of the online labor work that’s going on in Kenya, 72% of that… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Professor Vili Lehdonvirta: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Is engaged in writing and translation work. Actually, we know it’s just writing essays for students in global North universities. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, Patricia presenting these findings really turned on a light for me because what we had was this really difficult to prove, you know, lived experience of like global majority but like marginalized communities within education. And so I just became really excited with the idea that we could ask more questions and find out if this flow of information was really kind of fueling institutions around the world. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it’s not just undergrad essays. Shadow scholars are also hired to write entire PhD dissertations. They do all of the work, but someone else gets the credit, the qualifications, and eventually the jobs. The shadow scholars, meanwhile, aren’t afforded the same opportunities. So who are these shadow scholars? How does this exchange work? And what is the generative AI boom doing to this industry that relies on human intellectual labor? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We sat down with Patricia and Eloise to learn about how this industry works and shine some light on the people at the center of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Time for a new tab. Who are the shadow scholars? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Even the word fake essay, like that’s such a loaded phrase where, you know, the premise may be fake, but the person writing it is real, the content is real, it is a real academic work. Why frame this as shadow scholars? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Think it really forces us to think about something that we often don’t think about. So in relation to Africa, the word shadow is the most common analogy that’s used to describe Africa, “in the shadow of”, “the shadows of this.” It’s always in the shadows. And I think that I became really interested in this concept of the shadow, because in Swahili there is no word for shadow is something that doesn’t exist. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So from the moment you say that something is a shadow, basically what you’re saying is that it doesn’t exist in the world. And as the writers in Kenya themselves do, you could say it’s a support agency. You could use any number of different words for it, but to use it and to say that they’re shadow scholars, I think is something that’s forcing us to say, are these people real? Are they visible from whose perspective? And use the words to really question their position in the world and how they want to be seen in the world. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Here’s Eloise again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You just look at what media are saying about these people and how they’re discussing it and how it’s being discussed in the mainstream, right? And, you know, they’re being called these cancers that are brick by brick, breaking down um the sort of legitimacy of education. Like, the language is so xenophobic. Their identity was being hijacked and used in these really derogatory terms. And so that was something as well that really mindful throughout, like, how do we engage with them directly and have this story told from their perspective, but also like very much more on their terms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A review of studies found that nearly 16% of students admitted to contract cheating between 2014 and 2018. Extrapolated globally, that’s over 30 million students. The stats that we do have about contract cheating are likely skewed because they rely on students to self-report on their own cheating habits. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Altogether, Eloise said it’s a $15 billion industry. There are about 40,000 writers just in Nairobi, Kenya’s capital. That number fluctuates based on demand. Patricia said that during the end of the semester, when students are scrambling to turn in work, the number of writers might double. And is this an industry concentrated in Kenya, is it unique to Kenya, or does it manifest elsewhere in the Global South? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah it definitely does. When we talk to other academics who are looking into this, Dr Thomas Lancaster, who appears in the film, he specifically said there isn’t a country or university in the world where we don’t think that this is going on. It just so happens that Kenya is the hot spot, the global hot spot, where the greatest number of people are doing this work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kenya is a hotspot, because it’s an English speaking country with a strong education system and a high adult literacy rate. But at the same time, there aren’t many career opportunities for young people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it’s really worth saying that this industry has always existed. It’s actually nothing new insofar as there has always been people who have benefited from having other people write their work and do their work for them. What’s new now is the scale of the industry and the geography of the industry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But for example, we know that increasingly we’re getting so many of these kind of hidden figures stories. We’re hearing about, you know, women, we’re hearing about African-American, we’re hearing about gay and queer people who have propped up other people who’ve gone on to claim qualifications or claim inventions on their behalf because they were marginalized in history. What’s happened is as this has become harder and harder to actually do without scrutiny in the Global North, it’s shifted to locations that have been made invisible and that we were all invested in making this place as invisible, and also, because of technology, we can have this happen on a scale it’s never happened before. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ok. Let’s recap how this process works from students’ perspectives. A lot of these essay writing services advertise all over Instagram and TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Influencer: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I actually paid someone, I paid three people to write my essays. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Or they have excellent SEO. So if you Google “write a paper fast”, they’ll be at the very top of your results. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Influencer 2: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the fastest ways to meet your essay deadline while using a paper writing service is to choose one that offers a quick turnaround time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Once you settle on a site, you pick your subject and the grade you want and a page count. These sites might charge something like $8 per page, but charge more for more specialized topics like engineering or medicine. An undergrad literature essay, for example, will be significantly cheaper than a doctorate-level thesis. When you put your order in, you set a deadline, which could be anything from six months to six hours. For the shadow scholars in Kenya, the writers behind these papers, it’s all about response time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The thing that really fascinated me about the writers were there was a level of psychology that was involved actually. Um, you know, they would often set their alarms and their clocks to be up at certain times because they knew that’s when students would start to panic, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So they know that, you know, in the UK, if I have a deadline for tomorrow, I might maybe have a look at it, but by about 10 o’clock, I’m starting to get tired. I know I’m not going to get this thing done. That’s when I’m starting to look online for help. So they know, okay, around, you know, one o’clock, two o’ clock in the morning Kenya time, I need to be up because that’s when somebody’s gonna be jumping in online to get help. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some of the students who hire these services are very privileged. They’re even wealthy enough to hire shadow scholars for every university assignment up until graduation. And they develop relationships with the writers too. One of the Kenyan writers profiled in the documentary, Chege, had worked for the same student for years and through that was able to buy a car and pay for his sister to attend university. These dynamics are complex. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it’s really easy to imagine a world where the writers are quite derogatory about the students or they think badly of them or they speak about them in negative terms. I think one of the things that was really surprising for me was how much empathy sometimes they had with the students right and how they really genuinely saw themselves as trying to help these students. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think their empathy was really important in terms of how we then managed the story because it’s really easy to paint a picture of good guys and bad guys and those guys are terrible and these guys are great, but actually we needed a much more nuanced story about the students themselves as people who we wouldn’t necessarily use the word victims, but certainly weren’t necessarily always winning in this system. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The students hiring these writers have to have a certain level of access to resources to be able to do it at all. But the majority of them are not that rich. They’ll do most of their semester’s work by themselves and will hire shadow scholars as a last resort. Here’s Eloise again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So there’s a student who appears in the film called Kate, who talks about just how incredibly competitive it is at university. And once you understand that everyone’s cheating, it becomes almost like a zero sum game where if you aren’t cheating, then are you gonna be left behind if you aren’t getting someone else to do the work for you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The film shows Kate, overwhelmed, turning to an essay writing agency. But she doesn’t have the $300 to pay for her final paper. So she turns to the internet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everyone is so entwined by technology. Like we had Kate, who cannot afford to pay for the essay and then sells nudes online. But the fact is that in this kind of mechanism of like progress, like she’s both someone who was like a consumer and a trader in it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you describe any of the essay writers you profiled? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The shadows that we profiled were um young students who had then got on to graduate. So the point at which we met them and we spent four years filming with them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Most of the writers in the film are in their early to late 20s. There’s Mercy, a single mother who has a day job, but stays up late writing essays as a side gig. There’s Atticus, who specializes in technical writing for math and engineering classes. And then there’s Chege, the writer who was able to send his sister to university while being forced to put his own educational dreams on hold. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> One of the things I suppose I was really interested in focusing on was that after university life, like what is that kind of moment where everything should be great, you get the job of your dreams and actually what we found were a number of people who then ended up finding themselves in this industry for a long time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Eloise said that writers only get about 30% of the fee. The agency takes the rest. Not only are they underpaid, but they also can’t claim any credit for the work that they’re doing. They can’t use any of this experience to apply to universities themselves, especially not graduate programs, because they’re helping students cheat. This industry keeps ghost writers in the shadows. Let’s talk about the cost of anonymity in a new tab. After this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open a new tab. The cost of anonymity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of this work is uncredited. Can you talk about how that anonymity puts the writers at a disadvantage? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What you just see is that the writers are doing all of this work, they’re gaining the knowledge, they were really proud to be acquiring so much knowledge, they really saw that as a value to them, you know. But it doesn’t mean that they’re able to add it to their CV, it doesn’t mean that they are able to get into overseas universities to do a master’s degree, even though they might have been supplying the work for years to students who are going to those institutions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like presently there’s not a single university in Australia, for example, who would accept an undergraduate degree from Kenya to enter into a master’s program. And yet, they are probably third on the list as recipients of academic writing work from authors in Kenya who have been paid to do it on behalf of the students who are there. They are the ghosts in the cyber wars of these institutions, but they’re never being allowed in through the front door. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Patricia, I’m hoping you could answer this next question, but is there any stigma against being a fake essay writer? I mean, how do academic institutions see the role of the shadow scholar? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There isn’t a world that they can be in at the moment as themselves that would give them credit for all of the things that they’ve done. And so the film is really a kind of way to try to ensure that some level of that happens for them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s another complication here, too. These academic cheating services are illegal in the UK, New Zealand, Australia, and some American states. In the UK, offering these services is actually a criminal offense. Because of that, the documentary uses deepfake technology on some of its interview subjects to conceal their identities and avoid criminalizing them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But while the film has taken steps to anonymize these writers, essay mill sites themselves aren’t exactly secure. The writers’ legal names and photo IDs, the students’ final papers. All of this can be accessed fairly easily by bad actors. This digital paper trail could come back to haunt both students and writers, especially as more governments move to ban these services. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think for the writers, we’re not sure how it’s going to affect their future careers, but actually they’ve got very short to medium term needs that there’s no other way for them to meet them, you know. So they have to do this writing really and many of them actually try at the same time to do other work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For example, as we’ve mentioned with Australia, if they continue to see them as criminals and one of these writers, for example, wants to take up qualifications or have an opportunity in Australia, I don’t know what that will mean in terms of their identity being leaked or something like that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I just think on like an emotional level and a kind of lived experience level, like having this digital footprint where you made a decision when you were hard up and you were like in your 20s maybe or in your late teens, being there and being like on record and traceable when you have absolutely no idea, it’s just not something that anyone would want and anyone would sign up for. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The idea that like you’re susceptible to any kind of blackmail, like should you find yourself in like public office. And I think that’s on both sides. I think like a very real possibility. And so I think anyone who’s like holding large swathes of data, you know, they might not be nefarious themselves but they might be selling it on. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Patricia and Eloise have been following these shadow scholars for over four years. In that time, generative AI tools have rapidly become more sophisticated and accessible. Academic cheating is now as easy as a single click and it costs next to nothing. So is anyone still using essay writing services? What happens to the shadow scholars, whose livelihoods depend on essay writing, if students don’t have to pay a human to cheat? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open one last tab. Shadow Scholars and AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Over the years that the artificial intelligence industry was exploding, Eloise had been keeping tabs on a Facebook group for shadow scholars from all over the world. When she first started working on the film in 2020, it had about 60,000 members. By the time production was over, three years later, that number had roughly tripled. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So you could see how this industry was growing. But that acted as this kind of like town crier, like forum for understanding what people were feeling. And what people felt was in the first instance, like, “Oh God, we are totally over. Like this is the end of the industry. We were already being made invisible and now people are gonna go to this service that’s cheaper and we’re gonna be totally wiped out.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And by the end, as always, again, what is totally part of this kind of liberatory ideology that seems to sit within it is that people saying, “Well, actually, no, it’s not. It’s not perfect. We have this knowledge, we’ve been doing this for a long time.” And whilst their incomes were definitely and have definitely been impacted by the advent of AI, there was really this pushback that was happening that said, “Actually when you have the knowledge at the source, and you’re able to check it, the quality will be superior.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I wonder if Patricia, you can talk much more about like testing and the way that algorithms are like totally detectable by universities. And I think we’ve all become really accustomed to like the long dash. Like when I see that in a reply from someone…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which is tragic for me as a writer. I love the em dash. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There isn’t a uniform position by universities, right? So some universities are like, okay, if you’ve got particular needs, you can use AI. Other people are like under no circumstances do you use AI, and so the writers have been really able to exploit that lack of uniform position as part of a sales tactic to say, “Look, if use AI send your work to us, we will humanize it. We will remove all traces that you’ve had AI and we’ll send it back to you at a cost. It’ll cost you more because actually it requires more expertise to be able to spot all the falsifications, to spot the ways that AI hallucinates, to check all the references. We will do that detailed work and we will send it to you if you want to use AI. Or we can continue to do something bespoke for you.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think it has definitely shaped the way that they work because they’re getting many more students who are sending them things that they’ve used AI and said, “Can you make this look like I haven’t used AI,” and are charging them for that. Yet again, we’re in this world where we would rather think that AI has absolutely no human involvement than actually acknowledge the fact that it requires enormous amounts of human capital to make it happen in the first place. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that was the most interesting takeaway for me being a tech reporter watching the film was seeing the way that this industry of people adapted. Like Patricia said, this work is even more specialized than just writing the essay to make it sound human and to spot these kind of inconsistencies that only exist with AI. But at the same time, it seems to push them further into the shadows. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it really does. I think you’ve kind of hit on something that we found in this film. There was this perpetual loop that would happen where just at the moment you think there is a shift or reckoning that allows them to be seen and to be acknowledged, like there is another systemic move that further pushes them into the background. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think AI is kind of coalesces into two things, doesn’t it? It’s like, one, people would rather think that like robots and computers are going to like take over the world and they’re like so smart. But what it does is it comes up against an innate prejudice where people for years have thought that the “Africans” need to, and I use that like term because you know that’s how people use it in this sweeping term, like that they need to be educated, they need be taught how to be civilized, and actually what too many imaginations cannot hold is the reality that there are millions of educated people in the fastest growing youth population on the planet who are having access to technology that allows them to share their education. That was an inheritance of colonial settlements and imposed education systems. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so all of these things are totally intertwined. The prejudice that people think that they couldn’t be that smart to begin with and the prejudice that then denies when proof is beyond needing any more evidence that it still finds a way to deny them of this. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many shadow scholars have pivoted to editing and humanizing AI-generated writing. But AI itself keeps advancing. There are now countless AI tools that claim to be able to humanize other AI-generated text in order to bypass AI detection tools. Right now, those tools still don’t compare to actual human-written work. But at some point in the future, will shadow scholars become redundant? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think they will continue to adapt in ways that we haven’t even thought about yet, because we haven t been able to predict how they’ve lasted this long in the face of all of these different challenges. So, as long as there is demand, there will be these writers and I think there will continue be demand because institutions need to find ways to judge who is good or who isn’t good. And so I think that’s an important thing for us to think about. Is it possible that we can have a world where these qualifications start to mean something different, right, and who is good or not?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Shadow scholars have been fighting for recognition long before AI was a problem. Even though the documentary conceals individual writers’ identities, Eloise hopes that it at least makes more people aware of the industry. It’s not mysterious criminals powering essay mills, but real writers who are forced into the shadows because they don’t have the same opportunities as students in the global North.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> This documentary is also a kind of reckoning for academia. What does it mean for these institutions, if they’re awarding degrees and certifications to people who didn’t actually do the work to get them? And the people who did do the work are prevented from entering those very institutions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Next week, we’ll look at how this is playing out with younger students as we dive into how teachers are handling AI in their classrooms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The documentary, “The Shadow Scholars,” hits UK theaters on September 18th. For updates on this and further screenings, follow @ShadowScholarsFilm on Instagram. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For now, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Maya Cueva, and edited by Chris Egusa.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Our audio engineer is Brendan Willard. Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsay is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Ok, and I know it’s podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives, and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. Don’t forget to drop a comment and tell your friends, too. Or even your enemies! Or… frenemies? Your support is so important, especially in these \u003cem>unprecedented times\u003c/em>. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to Donate.KQED.org/podcasts!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Also! We want to hear from you! Email us CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram at “close all tabs pod.” Or TikTok at “close all tabs.” And join our Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at Discord.gg/KQED.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Thanks for listening!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "The documentary \"The Shadow Scholars\" follows ghostwriters in Kenya who are hired to write academic papers for students in the West. ",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1755659236,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 102,
"wordCount": 5550
},
"headData": {
"title": "Before ChatGPT, There Were 'Shadow Scholars' | KQED",
"description": "Thousands of writers in Kenya make their living ghostwriting academic papers for wealthy Western students. It’s an industry known as “contract cheating” or “essay mills,” and is the subject of a new documentary, “The Shadow Scholars.” Directed by Eloise King, the film follows Kenyan-born Oxford Professor Patricia Kingori as she investigates this hidden industry and seeks to understand the essay writers working in the shadows of the educational system.Morgan talks with Patricia and Eloise about the world of academic cheating, and how these writers are adapting to a world in which AI-generated essays are just a click away.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "Thousands of writers in Kenya make their living ghostwriting academic papers for wealthy Western students. It’s an industry known as “contract cheating” or “essay mills,” and is the subject of a new documentary, “The Shadow Scholars.” Directed by Eloise King, the film follows Kenyan-born Oxford Professor Patricia Kingori as she investigates this hidden industry and seeks to understand the essay writers working in the shadows of the educational system.Morgan talks with Patricia and Eloise about the world of academic cheating, and how these writers are adapting to a world in which AI-generated essays are just a click away.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Before ChatGPT, There Were 'Shadow Scholars'",
"datePublished": "2025-08-20T03:00:23-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-08-19T20:07:16-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC1401351139.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12052900/before-chatgpt-there-were-shadow-scholars",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thousands of writers in Kenya make their living ghostwriting academic papers for wealthy Western students. It’s an industry known as “contract cheating” or “essay mills,” and is the subject of a new documentary, “The Shadow Scholars.” Directed by Eloise King, the film follows Kenyan-born Oxford Professor Patricia Kingori as she investigates this hidden industry and seeks to understand the essay writers working in the shadows of the educational system. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Morgan talks with Patricia and Eloise about the world of academic cheating, and how these writers are adapting to a world in which AI-generated essays are just a click away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC1401351139\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.some.ox.ac.uk/our-people/patricia-kingori/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Patricia Kingori\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, professor of global health ethics at the University of Oxford\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/challenge/?next=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.instagram.com%2Felloweezee%2F%3Fhl%3Den%26__coig_challenged%3D1#\">Eloise King\u003c/a>, director of “The Shadow Scholars”\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bLZCTERhImw\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Shadow Scholars \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Directed by Eloise King \u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354713537_Kenya's_Fake_Essay_Writers_and_the_Light_they_Shine_on_Assumptions_of_Shadows_in_Knowledge_Production/citation/download\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kenya’s “Fake Essay” Writers and the Light they Shine on Assumptions of Shadows in Knowledge Production\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Patricia Kingori, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Journal of African Cultural Studies \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/ghostwriting-essays-american-college-students-lucrative-profession-kenya-a9096461.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How writing essays for American students has become a lucrative profession overseas\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Farah Stockman, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Independent \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereknewton/2025/05/14/georgia-bans-commercial-cheating-services/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Georgia Bans Commercial Cheating Services\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Derek Newton, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Forbes \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ci>\u003c/i>\u003ca href=\"https://www.fastcompany.com/90951343/ai-essays-advertising-on-meta-and-tiktok\">Companies that use AI to help you cheat at school are thriving on TikTok and Meta\u003c/a> — Chris Stokel-Walker, \u003ci>Fast Company\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Imagine you’re a college student. The end of the semester is just around the corner. It’s the middle of finals week and you have to study for an exam, finish a presentation and turn in a research paper all within the next 12 hours. Unfortunately, you’ve been procrastinating and you only have time to finish two of those three things. You could use a tool like Chat GPT, but you don’t wanna get caught using AI. So you open a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the search bar, you type, essay… writer… fast. Enter. Dozens of results pop up. Websites with generic-sounding names, but sleek, friendly designs. They promise high-quality, custom essays delivered in days, or even hours. All you have to do is run through a few drop-down menus and pick what you need, and then enter your credit card number. You’ve just stepped into an industry known as “contract cheating,” better known as essay mills. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s the subject of a new documentary, The Shadow Scholars, which just had its North American premiere at Tribeca Film Festival. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>The Shadow Scholars Trailer: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ve all grown up being told that education empowers us. And if you study at school, then you’re going to get the rewards. I’m going to shine a light on the world’s billion-dollar secret. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It looks at who the people are on the other side of that screen. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One day I was invited to go along to a lecture at the Oxford Internet Institute and they were talking about these online laborers. And then they started talking about different parts of the world and where different people in different parts of the worlds use the internet for work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Patricia Kingori, a Kenyan-born UK-based sociologist. In 2021, she became the youngest Black professor at the University of Oxford. She’s also one of the main subjects of the film. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So then they described Kenya and said, you know, there is this writing and translation work, which is a kind of euphemism for the fake essay industry. And I just became really interested in, well, who are these people? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This topic is personal for Patricia. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think if you have had your thesis stolen, as I have had the ideas from my thesis stolen, you immediately start to believe that an industry where people do benefit from the intellect of others exists, right? I think really allowed me to start from a presumption of the fact that they exist rather than I think where many people have not had this experience might start, which is, well, how can that be? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just after attending the lecture, Patricia caught up with filmmaker Eloise King, who ended up directing the documentary. They had known each other for years, and Patricia casually mentioned the so-called fake essay industry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My immediate reaction was how do real people write fake essays? And I was immediately obsessed. I think one of the things that we share is a kind of an inquisitiveness that goes really deep once it’s sort of implanted. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, Eloise and Patricia, dug deeper. What they found was a booming, but mostly hidden industry of writers centered in Kenya, who are paid to produce academic work for others. Patricia wrote about it in 2021 in the Journal of African Culture Studies. The name “shadow scholars” comes from author Dave Tomar, who wrote about his own experience as an academic ghostwriter in his 2012 memoir. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The film, “The Shadow Scholars”, is less about the ethics of cheating and more about the unseen labor involved. The documentary focuses on the shadow scholars based in Kenya, which is a major hub for the fake essay industry. They’re often hired by students in the US, the UK, and Australia. Here’s Patricia in the film. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So of all of the online labor work that’s going on in Kenya, 72% of that… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Professor Vili Lehdonvirta: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Is engaged in writing and translation work. Actually, we know it’s just writing essays for students in global North universities. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, Patricia presenting these findings really turned on a light for me because what we had was this really difficult to prove, you know, lived experience of like global majority but like marginalized communities within education. And so I just became really excited with the idea that we could ask more questions and find out if this flow of information was really kind of fueling institutions around the world. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it’s not just undergrad essays. Shadow scholars are also hired to write entire PhD dissertations. They do all of the work, but someone else gets the credit, the qualifications, and eventually the jobs. The shadow scholars, meanwhile, aren’t afforded the same opportunities. So who are these shadow scholars? How does this exchange work? And what is the generative AI boom doing to this industry that relies on human intellectual labor? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We sat down with Patricia and Eloise to learn about how this industry works and shine some light on the people at the center of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Time for a new tab. Who are the shadow scholars? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Even the word fake essay, like that’s such a loaded phrase where, you know, the premise may be fake, but the person writing it is real, the content is real, it is a real academic work. Why frame this as shadow scholars? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Think it really forces us to think about something that we often don’t think about. So in relation to Africa, the word shadow is the most common analogy that’s used to describe Africa, “in the shadow of”, “the shadows of this.” It’s always in the shadows. And I think that I became really interested in this concept of the shadow, because in Swahili there is no word for shadow is something that doesn’t exist. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So from the moment you say that something is a shadow, basically what you’re saying is that it doesn’t exist in the world. And as the writers in Kenya themselves do, you could say it’s a support agency. You could use any number of different words for it, but to use it and to say that they’re shadow scholars, I think is something that’s forcing us to say, are these people real? Are they visible from whose perspective? And use the words to really question their position in the world and how they want to be seen in the world. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Here’s Eloise again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You just look at what media are saying about these people and how they’re discussing it and how it’s being discussed in the mainstream, right? And, you know, they’re being called these cancers that are brick by brick, breaking down um the sort of legitimacy of education. Like, the language is so xenophobic. Their identity was being hijacked and used in these really derogatory terms. And so that was something as well that really mindful throughout, like, how do we engage with them directly and have this story told from their perspective, but also like very much more on their terms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">A review of studies found that nearly 16% of students admitted to contract cheating between 2014 and 2018. Extrapolated globally, that’s over 30 million students. The stats that we do have about contract cheating are likely skewed because they rely on students to self-report on their own cheating habits. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Altogether, Eloise said it’s a $15 billion industry. There are about 40,000 writers just in Nairobi, Kenya’s capital. That number fluctuates based on demand. Patricia said that during the end of the semester, when students are scrambling to turn in work, the number of writers might double. And is this an industry concentrated in Kenya, is it unique to Kenya, or does it manifest elsewhere in the Global South? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah it definitely does. When we talk to other academics who are looking into this, Dr Thomas Lancaster, who appears in the film, he specifically said there isn’t a country or university in the world where we don’t think that this is going on. It just so happens that Kenya is the hot spot, the global hot spot, where the greatest number of people are doing this work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Kenya is a hotspot, because it’s an English speaking country with a strong education system and a high adult literacy rate. But at the same time, there aren’t many career opportunities for young people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it’s really worth saying that this industry has always existed. It’s actually nothing new insofar as there has always been people who have benefited from having other people write their work and do their work for them. What’s new now is the scale of the industry and the geography of the industry. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But for example, we know that increasingly we’re getting so many of these kind of hidden figures stories. We’re hearing about, you know, women, we’re hearing about African-American, we’re hearing about gay and queer people who have propped up other people who’ve gone on to claim qualifications or claim inventions on their behalf because they were marginalized in history. What’s happened is as this has become harder and harder to actually do without scrutiny in the Global North, it’s shifted to locations that have been made invisible and that we were all invested in making this place as invisible, and also, because of technology, we can have this happen on a scale it’s never happened before. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ok. Let’s recap how this process works from students’ perspectives. A lot of these essay writing services advertise all over Instagram and TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Influencer: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I actually paid someone, I paid three people to write my essays. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Or they have excellent SEO. So if you Google “write a paper fast”, they’ll be at the very top of your results. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Influencer 2: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One of the fastest ways to meet your essay deadline while using a paper writing service is to choose one that offers a quick turnaround time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Once you settle on a site, you pick your subject and the grade you want and a page count. These sites might charge something like $8 per page, but charge more for more specialized topics like engineering or medicine. An undergrad literature essay, for example, will be significantly cheaper than a doctorate-level thesis. When you put your order in, you set a deadline, which could be anything from six months to six hours. For the shadow scholars in Kenya, the writers behind these papers, it’s all about response time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The thing that really fascinated me about the writers were there was a level of psychology that was involved actually. Um, you know, they would often set their alarms and their clocks to be up at certain times because they knew that’s when students would start to panic, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So they know that, you know, in the UK, if I have a deadline for tomorrow, I might maybe have a look at it, but by about 10 o’clock, I’m starting to get tired. I know I’m not going to get this thing done. That’s when I’m starting to look online for help. So they know, okay, around, you know, one o’clock, two o’ clock in the morning Kenya time, I need to be up because that’s when somebody’s gonna be jumping in online to get help. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some of the students who hire these services are very privileged. They’re even wealthy enough to hire shadow scholars for every university assignment up until graduation. And they develop relationships with the writers too. One of the Kenyan writers profiled in the documentary, Chege, had worked for the same student for years and through that was able to buy a car and pay for his sister to attend university. These dynamics are complex. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it’s really easy to imagine a world where the writers are quite derogatory about the students or they think badly of them or they speak about them in negative terms. I think one of the things that was really surprising for me was how much empathy sometimes they had with the students right and how they really genuinely saw themselves as trying to help these students. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think their empathy was really important in terms of how we then managed the story because it’s really easy to paint a picture of good guys and bad guys and those guys are terrible and these guys are great, but actually we needed a much more nuanced story about the students themselves as people who we wouldn’t necessarily use the word victims, but certainly weren’t necessarily always winning in this system. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The students hiring these writers have to have a certain level of access to resources to be able to do it at all. But the majority of them are not that rich. They’ll do most of their semester’s work by themselves and will hire shadow scholars as a last resort. Here’s Eloise again. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So there’s a student who appears in the film called Kate, who talks about just how incredibly competitive it is at university. And once you understand that everyone’s cheating, it becomes almost like a zero sum game where if you aren’t cheating, then are you gonna be left behind if you aren’t getting someone else to do the work for you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The film shows Kate, overwhelmed, turning to an essay writing agency. But she doesn’t have the $300 to pay for her final paper. So she turns to the internet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everyone is so entwined by technology. Like we had Kate, who cannot afford to pay for the essay and then sells nudes online. But the fact is that in this kind of mechanism of like progress, like she’s both someone who was like a consumer and a trader in it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you describe any of the essay writers you profiled? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The shadows that we profiled were um young students who had then got on to graduate. So the point at which we met them and we spent four years filming with them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Most of the writers in the film are in their early to late 20s. There’s Mercy, a single mother who has a day job, but stays up late writing essays as a side gig. There’s Atticus, who specializes in technical writing for math and engineering classes. And then there’s Chege, the writer who was able to send his sister to university while being forced to put his own educational dreams on hold. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> One of the things I suppose I was really interested in focusing on was that after university life, like what is that kind of moment where everything should be great, you get the job of your dreams and actually what we found were a number of people who then ended up finding themselves in this industry for a long time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Eloise said that writers only get about 30% of the fee. The agency takes the rest. Not only are they underpaid, but they also can’t claim any credit for the work that they’re doing. They can’t use any of this experience to apply to universities themselves, especially not graduate programs, because they’re helping students cheat. This industry keeps ghost writers in the shadows. Let’s talk about the cost of anonymity in a new tab. After this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open a new tab. The cost of anonymity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of this work is uncredited. Can you talk about how that anonymity puts the writers at a disadvantage? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What you just see is that the writers are doing all of this work, they’re gaining the knowledge, they were really proud to be acquiring so much knowledge, they really saw that as a value to them, you know. But it doesn’t mean that they’re able to add it to their CV, it doesn’t mean that they are able to get into overseas universities to do a master’s degree, even though they might have been supplying the work for years to students who are going to those institutions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Like presently there’s not a single university in Australia, for example, who would accept an undergraduate degree from Kenya to enter into a master’s program. And yet, they are probably third on the list as recipients of academic writing work from authors in Kenya who have been paid to do it on behalf of the students who are there. They are the ghosts in the cyber wars of these institutions, but they’re never being allowed in through the front door. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Patricia, I’m hoping you could answer this next question, but is there any stigma against being a fake essay writer? I mean, how do academic institutions see the role of the shadow scholar? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There isn’t a world that they can be in at the moment as themselves that would give them credit for all of the things that they’ve done. And so the film is really a kind of way to try to ensure that some level of that happens for them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s another complication here, too. These academic cheating services are illegal in the UK, New Zealand, Australia, and some American states. In the UK, offering these services is actually a criminal offense. Because of that, the documentary uses deepfake technology on some of its interview subjects to conceal their identities and avoid criminalizing them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But while the film has taken steps to anonymize these writers, essay mill sites themselves aren’t exactly secure. The writers’ legal names and photo IDs, the students’ final papers. All of this can be accessed fairly easily by bad actors. This digital paper trail could come back to haunt both students and writers, especially as more governments move to ban these services. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think for the writers, we’re not sure how it’s going to affect their future careers, but actually they’ve got very short to medium term needs that there’s no other way for them to meet them, you know. So they have to do this writing really and many of them actually try at the same time to do other work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For example, as we’ve mentioned with Australia, if they continue to see them as criminals and one of these writers, for example, wants to take up qualifications or have an opportunity in Australia, I don’t know what that will mean in terms of their identity being leaked or something like that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I just think on like an emotional level and a kind of lived experience level, like having this digital footprint where you made a decision when you were hard up and you were like in your 20s maybe or in your late teens, being there and being like on record and traceable when you have absolutely no idea, it’s just not something that anyone would want and anyone would sign up for. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The idea that like you’re susceptible to any kind of blackmail, like should you find yourself in like public office. And I think that’s on both sides. I think like a very real possibility. And so I think anyone who’s like holding large swathes of data, you know, they might not be nefarious themselves but they might be selling it on. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Patricia and Eloise have been following these shadow scholars for over four years. In that time, generative AI tools have rapidly become more sophisticated and accessible. Academic cheating is now as easy as a single click and it costs next to nothing. So is anyone still using essay writing services? What happens to the shadow scholars, whose livelihoods depend on essay writing, if students don’t have to pay a human to cheat? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open one last tab. Shadow Scholars and AI. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Over the years that the artificial intelligence industry was exploding, Eloise had been keeping tabs on a Facebook group for shadow scholars from all over the world. When she first started working on the film in 2020, it had about 60,000 members. By the time production was over, three years later, that number had roughly tripled. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So you could see how this industry was growing. But that acted as this kind of like town crier, like forum for understanding what people were feeling. And what people felt was in the first instance, like, “Oh God, we are totally over. Like this is the end of the industry. We were already being made invisible and now people are gonna go to this service that’s cheaper and we’re gonna be totally wiped out.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And by the end, as always, again, what is totally part of this kind of liberatory ideology that seems to sit within it is that people saying, “Well, actually, no, it’s not. It’s not perfect. We have this knowledge, we’ve been doing this for a long time.” And whilst their incomes were definitely and have definitely been impacted by the advent of AI, there was really this pushback that was happening that said, “Actually when you have the knowledge at the source, and you’re able to check it, the quality will be superior.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I wonder if Patricia, you can talk much more about like testing and the way that algorithms are like totally detectable by universities. And I think we’ve all become really accustomed to like the long dash. Like when I see that in a reply from someone…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which is tragic for me as a writer. I love the em dash. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There isn’t a uniform position by universities, right? So some universities are like, okay, if you’ve got particular needs, you can use AI. Other people are like under no circumstances do you use AI, and so the writers have been really able to exploit that lack of uniform position as part of a sales tactic to say, “Look, if use AI send your work to us, we will humanize it. We will remove all traces that you’ve had AI and we’ll send it back to you at a cost. It’ll cost you more because actually it requires more expertise to be able to spot all the falsifications, to spot the ways that AI hallucinates, to check all the references. We will do that detailed work and we will send it to you if you want to use AI. Or we can continue to do something bespoke for you.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I think it has definitely shaped the way that they work because they’re getting many more students who are sending them things that they’ve used AI and said, “Can you make this look like I haven’t used AI,” and are charging them for that. Yet again, we’re in this world where we would rather think that AI has absolutely no human involvement than actually acknowledge the fact that it requires enormous amounts of human capital to make it happen in the first place. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think that was the most interesting takeaway for me being a tech reporter watching the film was seeing the way that this industry of people adapted. Like Patricia said, this work is even more specialized than just writing the essay to make it sound human and to spot these kind of inconsistencies that only exist with AI. But at the same time, it seems to push them further into the shadows. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Eloise King:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it really does. I think you’ve kind of hit on something that we found in this film. There was this perpetual loop that would happen where just at the moment you think there is a shift or reckoning that allows them to be seen and to be acknowledged, like there is another systemic move that further pushes them into the background. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think AI is kind of coalesces into two things, doesn’t it? It’s like, one, people would rather think that like robots and computers are going to like take over the world and they’re like so smart. But what it does is it comes up against an innate prejudice where people for years have thought that the “Africans” need to, and I use that like term because you know that’s how people use it in this sweeping term, like that they need to be educated, they need be taught how to be civilized, and actually what too many imaginations cannot hold is the reality that there are millions of educated people in the fastest growing youth population on the planet who are having access to technology that allows them to share their education. That was an inheritance of colonial settlements and imposed education systems. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so all of these things are totally intertwined. The prejudice that people think that they couldn’t be that smart to begin with and the prejudice that then denies when proof is beyond needing any more evidence that it still finds a way to deny them of this. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Many shadow scholars have pivoted to editing and humanizing AI-generated writing. But AI itself keeps advancing. There are now countless AI tools that claim to be able to humanize other AI-generated text in order to bypass AI detection tools. Right now, those tools still don’t compare to actual human-written work. But at some point in the future, will shadow scholars become redundant? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Patricia Kingori:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think they will continue to adapt in ways that we haven’t even thought about yet, because we haven t been able to predict how they’ve lasted this long in the face of all of these different challenges. So, as long as there is demand, there will be these writers and I think there will continue be demand because institutions need to find ways to judge who is good or who isn’t good. And so I think that’s an important thing for us to think about. Is it possible that we can have a world where these qualifications start to mean something different, right, and who is good or not?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Shadow scholars have been fighting for recognition long before AI was a problem. Even though the documentary conceals individual writers’ identities, Eloise hopes that it at least makes more people aware of the industry. It’s not mysterious criminals powering essay mills, but real writers who are forced into the shadows because they don’t have the same opportunities as students in the global North.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> This documentary is also a kind of reckoning for academia. What does it mean for these institutions, if they’re awarding degrees and certifications to people who didn’t actually do the work to get them? And the people who did do the work are prevented from entering those very institutions. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Next week, we’ll look at how this is playing out with younger students as we dive into how teachers are handling AI in their classrooms. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The documentary, “The Shadow Scholars,” hits UK theaters on September 18th. For updates on this and further screenings, follow @ShadowScholarsFilm on Instagram. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For now, let’s close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. This episode was produced by Maya Cueva, and edited by Chris Egusa.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Close All Tabs producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Additional editing by Chris Hambrick and Jen Chien, who is KQED’s Director of Podcasts. Our audio engineer is Brendan Willard. Original music, including our theme song and credits, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsay is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Ok, and I know it’s podcast cliche, but if you like these deep dives, and want us to keep making more, it would really help us out if you could rate and review us on Spotify, Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to the show. Don’t forget to drop a comment and tell your friends, too. Or even your enemies! Or… frenemies? Your support is so important, especially in these \u003cem>unprecedented times\u003c/em>. And if you really like Close All Tabs and want to support public media, go to Donate.KQED.org/podcasts!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Also! We want to hear from you! Email us CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram at “close all tabs pod.” Or TikTok at “close all tabs.” And join our Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at Discord.gg/KQED.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Thanks for listening!\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12052900/before-chatgpt-there-were-shadow-scholars",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_25184",
"news_18085",
"news_17731",
"news_19374",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_1631",
"news_6699"
],
"featImg": "news_12052910",
"label": "source_news_12052900"
},
"news_12051989": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12051989",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12051989",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1755079254000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "does-gen-z-have-a-staring-problem",
"title": "Does Gen Z Have A Staring Problem?",
"publishDate": 1755079254,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Does Gen Z Have A Staring Problem? | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Have you heard of the “Gen Z stare”? It’s the blank look some Gen Zers seem to give instead of the usual greetings or small talk—and it’s the latest skirmish in a years-long generation war between Gen Z and Millennials. Internet culture researcher Aidan Walker joins Morgan to trace the origins of this rivalry, unpack what behavioral quirks like “the Gen Z stare” and “the Millennial pause” reveal about each generation’s relationship with technology, and explore why everyone seems to forget about Gen X. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC5336355522\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.aidanwalker.info/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aidan Walker\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, independent writer, content creator, and internet culture researcher\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2025/07/18/nx-s1-5468597/gen-z-stare-tiktok-explained-meme-expert-trend-viral\">Is the ‘Gen Z stare’ just a call to look inward?\u003c/a>\u003ci> — \u003c/i>Manuela López Restrepo and Mia Venkat, \u003ci>NPR\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/27/gen-z-stare-its-got-nothing-on-the-gen-x-look-of-dread\">Have you been a victim of the ‘gen Z stare’? It’s got nothing on the gen X look of dread\u003c/a> — Emma Beddington, \u003ci>The Guardian\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/gen-z-stare-explainer-rcna219262\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen Z is staring at you. It may be more than just a quirk.\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Kalhan Rosenblatt, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NBC News\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We are on the heels of yet another battle. The two factions, once united against a common enemy, have been attacking each other for nearly half a decade. And by attack, I mean they’re calling each other cringe. This is the war between Gen Z and Millennials. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen Z is on the defensive in this latest skirmish as they fight accusations of the Gen Z stare. It’s that blank, glassy gaze that young people have in lieu of socially acceptable small talk. On social media, millennials and Gen Xers have complained about the Gen Z stare in meetings with colleagues, in customer service interactions, and pretty much every social exchange in a public space. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Brooke (@nolablest2020): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re talking about the stare when anyone tries to have just a normal human interaction with you like in the flesh and you guys freeze the f**k up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Katherine Burleson (@katherineburleson0): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People are going back and forth and Gen Z’s like, “No it’s like an are you serious like are you dumb type of stare.” And other people are like, “No it’s almost like a blank look are you even there?” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To be fair, sometimes the Gen Z stare is warranted. If you’ve ever worked in customer service, you know exactly what I mean. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Natalie Reynolds (@natalie.reynolds178): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yes, the strawberry banana smoothie does have banana in it, unfortunately. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And Gen Z has been making fun of millennials for years, too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>@she_legacy1: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Have you guys ever noticed that when older people post videos and by older, I mean like, maybe like 35, 40s and on, they always start the video. They wait like one, two, three seconds to make sure it’s filming and then they smile and then they start talking. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Where did this war between Gen Z and Millennials really start? What can this seemingly eternal fight tell us about the ways each generation has been shaped by the internet? And amid all of these petty generational spats, why does everyone forget about Gen X? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, so I have something to confess. I am a cusper, or zillennial, or whatever you wanna call that generational cohort that was born too late to count as a millennial and too early to really be Gen Z. So in the seemingly eternal war between the two groups, I’ve always been a double agent. Joining me to unpack this generational war today is another double agent, Aidan Walker. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I’d say I’m an internet culture researcher and historian. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In addition to his actual academic research on memes, Aidan also breaks down these cultural trends on TikTok as @Aidanetcetera, and on his sub stack, How To Do Things with Memes. Before we get into this generational warfare, I’m very curious, what generation do you most closely identify with? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m cusp. I’m like between the two. I guess I’m like an elder Gen Z. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Same, I’m like, yeah, either the oldest of the Gen Z or the youngest of the millennials. And in my many years of covering this ongoing warfare, I’ve been a spy for both sides. I’ve faking it this whole time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I’ll say this, I’m not sure that there’s specific battles in the Gen Z millennial war that are going to be sung of by the bards. I think it’s often been a cold war at certain points. I think its been kind of like a war of attrition. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So we’re going to look at the origins of this cold war, starting with a new tab. The Great Millennial Gen Z War. This war didn’t begin with any public declaration. In fact, this generational tension started way, way before skinny jeans were cringe. Back in 2012, Tide Pods hit the market. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They have bright colors. They look like a kind of heart candy. And it’s just the most delicious thing, but it’s also the forbidden fruit of all time because “They,” capital T, “They” tell you that if you eat a Tide Pod, you will be unalived, as a Gen Z person would say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the years that followed, poison control centers reported that thousands of young children had eaten the tempting, but deadly, laundry pots. Eating Tide Pods kind of became a joke online. And so, by 2018, the Tide Pot Challenge was born. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Dominic Beesley (@dominicbeesley8589): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Hey guys, what’s up, Dominic here, and in today’s video I’ll be doing the Tide Pod challenge where you bite into a Tide pod… did you really think i was gonna eat a tide pod?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Media outlets warned parents of the lethal Tide Pod craze sweeping the internet. And although some teenagers did actually record themselves trying to eat TidePods, social media and mainstream press coverage very quickly blew it out of proportion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>News Anchor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well what began as a social media joke is leading to some serious concerns from doctors tonight. It involves teenagers appearing to eat laundry detergent pods and posting the pictures on social media. Photos show the pods being used as pizza toppings or a bowl of them mixed with bleach for breakfast. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The vast majority of teenagers were not guzzling down Tide Pods, but they were making and liking memes about being tempted by Tide Pods, which only fueled the hysteria. Some millennials, meanwhile, distanced themselves from the antics of Gen Z. This is where we really start to see the rift between generations form online. The relationship was briefly mended in 2019 when the phrase, “okay boomer” blew up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Peter Kuli and Jedwill: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He gonna take over the mic. Okay boomer, okay okay boomer. Okay boomer. Okay boomer.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For a few beautiful months, Millennials and Gen Z were a united front against the baby boomers, or really anyone they perceived as a boomer. It was the perfect comeback. If someone online had a bad out-of-touch take, Millennials on Gen Z would hit back with, “okay, boomer.” For a while, there was peace. And then the COVID pandemic started and the internet evolved. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s Corona Time! Hey, it’s Corona time right now! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So COVID is this moment that disrupts all of our lives. For Gen Z, COVID is this thing that happens before your life has really begun. Maybe you’re in high school, maybe you’re college, maybe you are like the first or second year out of college. And it becomes this thing where you’re like entering the world and you see the world ending kind of in a way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But for millennials, I feel like they were maybe a little bit more established. And so it became this sudden, like, ghostly pause where you were working from home for a year or two. And I think for both groups, it was very hard in different ways. But I think it’s when you start to see the glaring difference. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I feel like COVID happened 2020. TikTok is the hottest social media platform and it’s like mostly Gen Z on TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Feelin’ shitty in my bed, didn’t take my fucking meds. The beat, sound to the beat…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like that’s when Gen Z started to really gain this kind of cultural capital online. How might that start to stoke the tensions between generations? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It changes the format of online culture. It’s now things start on vertical video, then they trickle out to the other platforms. And TikTok is dominated by these young kids, so all these young kids are video editors and they’re able to start putting their own mark on things. I think it really was a moment where suddenly the cutting edge of internet culture is a little bit younger than it was before. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk about this resistance that a lot of millennials had to using TikTok at first, if you remember back then? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I remember it because I had that resistance as well. It was the first social media app where I didn’t feel native to it right away. I was just kind of, it’s almost too fast, you know, it had this bad rap, like in the boomer press, people are like, “Oh, it’s Chinese intelligence, mining our data.” And it just sort of felt as if I didn’t t need it in my life, or there would be a bit of a learning curve to get into it. And, uh, of course now I’m, uh… I guess a TikTok influencer to some extent. So I did end up adopting it. But it just was this alienating moment where you sort of realize, “I grew up with the internet and now the internet has grown past me.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We also see fashion trends moving on, like side parts are supposedly out, middle parts are in. Skinny jeans, people are ditching those, like post-COVID, no one wants to wear skinny jeans after quarantine. And moving on from this almost seems like a rejection of like the millennial fashion. How did millennials react to this? Because I didn’t think it was that deep, but if you look at media coverage, it was like, “Oh my God.” You’d expect like a massacre of skinny jeans. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, it is that deep for some people because I think we have such a weird fixation on youth in our culture. So it’s really an existential crisis for people to feel themselves move from like one demographic category to another. You know, you’re sitting there looking at your skinny jeans and you’ve just turned 30. And it’s like, it’s time to let them go. And it not just that you’re going through that sort of private process. It’s that you see someone 10 years younger than you on TikTok when you open your phone mocking you for it. And so I understand why people felt hurt. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Millennials defended themselves with an arsenal of clap back songs? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alicia Arise (@aliciaarise): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m about to be a millennial with my side part and skinny jeans. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Serena Terry: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So you think we’re old? Well I ain’t having that. We give you wifi and we can take it back \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Mikki Hommel (@mikkihommel.music): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was born in 1985, side part and and skinny jeans, and I overused the laugh emoji.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By 2022, Gen Z had become very adept at rage-baiting millennials. Rage-bait is exactly what it sounds like. It’s content deliberately made to provoke anger so that viewers respond and it drives up engagement. It’s pivotal in this war between generations. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, anything that is a controversy does well on the internet. That’s like a fundamental law that everybody knows. And so I think why the generational rage bait begins is first of all, it does numbers for those reasons. And secondly, it kind of helps people to establish their own identity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, this is a time where Gen Z is just distinguishing itself from millennials. And so the way you do that is by, you know, kind of aggressively saying like, “They wear skinny jeans.” Like these sorts of things that may be cosmetic, but you know, when you’re very nascent in figuring out your identity, they mean a lot to you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By the early 2020s, the difference in the way that millennials and Gen Z interact with the internet and with technology also becomes very clear. There’s the dreaded millennial pause, which is that dead air at the beginning of a video before someone starts talking. Usually it’s because they started recording, but they pause to check that it’s recording and they don’t edit that out. And then there’s the inverse, which is the Gen Z shake. Do you wanna explain what that is? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the Gen Z shake, and I’ve seen millennials do it too, so it’s not just limited to that, is when you start a recording, but you kind of do it in such a way that it seems like you just threw your phone down on the table. Like, suddenly you had this opinion about Taylor Swift and you just couldn’t hold it in. You’re about to head out the door, but you press record and the phone’s not even on the the table, and so the entire screen shakes. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And you sit down and you say, “guys,” and you’re just unburdened yourself. And it’s kind of like a faked casualness because you imagine them. You know, setting the phone down on the table several times, you know, over the course of different takes doing this video. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But what do these two habits, the millennial pause and the Gen Z shake, of which I am both guilty. I mean, honestly, I’ve done both, I’m not gonna lie. But what can they tell us about the way that each generation performs online? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So with the millennial pause, the first thing it tells you is they aren’t as good at editing themselves on video or it isn’t as natural to them. But I think what the millennia pause really says to me is it’s that moment where you see the difference between the offstage persona that is like setting up the recording that is sitting in their kitchen and then the onstage persona that is giving the take that is saying the thing they’ve planned to say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And because you see that transition, you know that the take is scripted somehow, you know, that it’s the real them, but it’s the them that they’ve curated and made. And it feels almost like someone wearing like an untucked shirt or something to a business meeting. You know, it’s like everybody knows that it doesn’t really matter. But like, you tuck in the shirt, that’s just the way it’s done. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, you go in cap cut and you just shave off your half a second. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, you make it seem seamless so that as a viewer, I can forget that everything is fake. And the Gen Z shake is of course equally fake and inauthentic, but it’s seamless. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Though there have been a few developments in the last year, similar to the skinny jeans debacle, crew socks are very popular with Gen Z. Millennials are very defensive of their ankle socks. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then we also saw millennials taking digs against Gen Z. There was a whole debate over, you know, whether Gen Z is aging faster than millennials did, that kind of thing. And it just feels like every single one of these developments is just like another petty dig that honestly could apply to either generation. What do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think they are petty digs. I think that they tie into real anxieties about aging that people have. I also think it’s worth mentioning that technically generations are fake. They’re a thing we made up. Everything’s a social construct, right? But generations are a little more socially constructed than some other things. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think often what we’re dealing with are these anxieties around aging and then anxieties about social media itself and how it’s changing and how fast it’s changing. And people do get a certain amount of like, identity affirmation out of fighting people that aren’t like them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Speaking of identity groups and anxiety about aging, where is Gen X in all of this? We’ll talk about that after this break. Okay, new tab. What about Gen X? Let’s talk about Gen X throwing their hat in the ring, trying to join the fight. Do you remember Gen X Rise? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yes. It was Gen-Xers venerating their own culture’s uniqueness and importance. It was a lot of like Star Wars. It’s a lot like 80s kid type references. It was lot of Gen X, you know, asserting space on the internet. And I can’t really enter into the mindset of a Gen Xer. But I think a piece of it is they probably have always kind of felt outsiders on this. I think a lot of them only got online maybe in like the late 2010s when it became a mainstream adult thing for people to do and then now they want to clean their little corner of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just remember from the trend, it was like in the middle of the whole Gen Z-millennial, you know, going at each other and all these making all these petty jabs. And then you’d be scrolling through all these videos of millennials and Gen Z fighting and then the middle would just be like… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen X Rise. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re here, too, like. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Basically, yeah. And so I just think it’s very funny that Gen Z and Millennials put aside their differences to fight a common enemy. And by fight, I mean make cringe compilations. Can you talk about how cringe is like wielded in generation wars? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cringe is the weapon of choice in Generation Wars, I would say, calling the other side cringe, compiling examples of them having done it and editing it with like a jaunty soundtrack. Cringe like is always in the eye of the beholder, you know, and so you really I think create cringe by having enough beholders agree with you that it is cringe. There is an element to it though, particularly with millennial cringe. That is centered around like seeing through or around the performance. I’m thinking of like the stomp clap music. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>The Lumineers: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ho! Hey!\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Lumineers style, right. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Lumineers style, that’s sort of become cringe now because it’s so sincere and yet it’s sincere in a way that it’s overly performative. You aren’t from the holler, you’re like a dude in Brooklyn and that’s what gets cringed is when people try too hard. And then the genius of the cringe tactic as an offensive kind of move against an enemy is that because it’s trying too hard if they try to defend themselves, they’re, again, trying too hard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Going back to Gen X Rise and all that, you know, Gen X is so often forgotten online that it’s become a meme in itself. Why do you think that entire generation is, yeah, just so often overlooked and forgotten about online? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think Gen X is forgotten. I think demographically, they’re smaller than the other generations. So that’s one piece of it. Another part of it is that there’s not as much of like a meme trail there. Like one of the weird things about these fights between Gen Z and millennials is that they kind of like make each other through the fight. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, so the things that millennials say, “Oh, that’s a Gen Z trait,” or the things the Gen Z says, “Oh, That’s a millennial trait.” And I don’t know if Gen X was ever that closely watched or faught with by millennials. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I also wonder how much of it is like you can’t use cringe against them as effectively because Gen X just doesn’t have as much of a digital footprint as millennials did. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We don’t have the receipts, yeah. We have like, yeah, we have like the music video of Kurt Cobain, but we don’t have the posts of all the people trying to do grunge culture on- \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When they’re 15 from their bedrooms, we see it in movies, it’s less raw, there’s less of a record and so Gen X escapes scrutiny that way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Once upon a time, older generations referred to millennials as the lazy, entitled generation. But it seems like every time a new generation ages into young adulthood, it’s their turn to be scrutinized. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that brings us back to the most recent skirmish in this generational war. The Gen Z stare. Let’s open a new tab. What’s up with the Gen Z stare? Okay, so let’s talk about the Gen Z stare. What is it? How would you describe it? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the Gen Z stare is just… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s not dead air. Aiden has this vacant slack expression as if he was just factory reset. He’s doing the Gen Z stare. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Blank face. You know, someone’s just looking at you just a long pause and their brain is either buffering or processing or they’re dissociating, staring off into space. The context that people saw it most often come up was like customer service type things. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I guess like the stereotypical interaction would be some millennial or Gen X is like getting a coffee. And then they say they want, you know, sugar in it or something, or like a certain type of pump. And then the barista who’s Gen Z just kind of looks at them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so it’s this like, they’re not quite housebroken in a way for like public social interactions is the Gen Z stare. You know, they aren’t able to like interface fully or they don’t recognize when it’s their turn to talk essentially. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, a lot of people have blamed like the pandemic as these like this most formative time in childhood development is, but you’re kept in isolation, you know, and your only interactions are online. But you had your own theory, which you posted about. Can you explain that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, my own theory was that if the millennial pause is you’re seeing the shift between offstage to onstage, so they’re performing too much, the Gen Z stare is like a refusal to perform. It is a total like, “Okay, I’m not going to make the small talk. I’m not going to ask the follow-up question. I’m just here and people are gonna help me because I’m in public and I’m here, I’m a customer,” or whatever it is. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve been thinking about it in terms of like, if you go to a downtown of like any major city in the U.S. and you go look at the lunch places, they’re all like slop bowl places for the most part. And you think of how much human interaction actually happens, like you could be ordering from a screen. And the idea is just you go and you get your food, you leave. And I think so many public spaces are like that, that the etiquette is essentially like being on a train or a bus. If you’re on the subway and you don’t really talk to people, like that’s not proper. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think it’s almost like Gen Z sees all IRL public space like the subway in a way where it doesn’t make sense, you know, to have a small talk interaction, you know, this sort of asocial — COVID being the intensifier of it, you know, when really we were so distant from each other. I think it’s downstream of that. Like Gen Z just doesn’t see public space the same way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right. I mean, because so much interaction with strangers, with people who aren’t directly in your life just happens online anyway. Whereas previous generations, like, yeah, like I guess boomers and maybe like some Gen Xers were like really into small talk because they didn’t have the internet. They didn’t social media. And now it’s like, well, you’re getting all that interaction anyway, just in a different way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly, yeah, like the example I said in the video was I was at a cracker barrel at this point, like a month or two ago, and I was traveling on the road to elsewhere. And at the table next to us, like a booth next to us, there’s an older couple sitting there, a man and a woman. And another old man walks by and the two old men recognize each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And they start having this small talk conversation about, you know, one guy’s brother going into a home and then sort of they’re catching up. It occurs to me that these two old guys don’t seem to know each other very well. I’m almost imagining that it’s the kind of thing like maybe they went to high school together or something in this same small town and they’ve had a marginal relationship their entire lives, have known of each other’s existence, been in the same network, or maybe they were co-workers somewhere before they were retired. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that this conversation of the two of them talking and taking the time to stop in the cracker barrel to have this pleasantry exchange is actually how this one guy is going to find out about this other guy’s brother going to a home. You know, it’s how they’re going to find out how people they know are doing. It’s how they’re gonna find out what’s happening in the community, because their intel about their social environment is made up of these interactions that happen in these public spaces. Whether it’s Cracker Barrel, whether it’s church, whether, you know, the store. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the fact that Gen Z doesn’t have that, it sort of occurred to me that, you know, I’m not sure I would have that conversation with someone I knew marginally that I went to high school, but I haven’t really talked to since. I would probably pretend I didn’t notice them in a public space. And it’s because if I want that data, I go on Instagram and I see, okay, she’s getting married. Her fiance looks nice. Haven’t seen her in eight years. Happy for her. You know, like there’s this kind of immediacy, but also it happens through the platforms. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know you no longer need these specially made places for it. And so the Cracker Barrel just becomes a place to eat for me. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the Gen Z stare is a refusal to use public space as public space. It’s. Treating it as private space, right? You’re just there to get what you want to get to fulfill the particular function. And you’re not gonna put on the front of saying, oh, how was the weather? How are you doing? If you’re just gonna say, how do I get from point A to point B? And you gonna save your emotional labor, I guess your social presentation for the platforms where you actually have more of a chance to control it and more of chance to choose where it goes and who it’s going to. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What does the Gen Z stare tell us about… us? Well, instead of being expected to perform social niceties all the time, a lot of younger generations choose when and how they want to be perceived. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But maybe there is something lost in the way we socialize now. Everything online is so curated, and there is some thing about the messiness of spontaneous real-life connections that feels very human. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then again, the Gen Z stare could just be a sign that people are finding this kind of connection online instead. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s be real. Every generation has been hated on and criticized by previous generations. It’s just how things go. But things are different now. The internet and the way we’re constantly consuming and participating in content puts each generation under more of a microscope. It amplifies the tension between each group. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So we often see these arguments end with, you know, Gen Z expressing anger over the current economic and labor conditions that they’ve grown into, you know that they have aged into. But millennials, aren’t necessarily the ones to blame because they also faced very, you now, tumultuous economic and labor conditions when they aged into adulthood. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen Z probably hates the boomers more than millennials, just as I’m sure millennials kind of know the boomers are… If you, I think if you were to do polling, that’s what people would say would be my suspicion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think the economic angle of it is important because if COVID for Gen Z was this moment kind of before their adult life began, where it kind of threw the whole thing in doubt. And for millennials, it was, you know, they, this sort of hard one stability or you know, first few steps on the path of life that suddenly get derailed or jostled around. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So are these markers of cultural conflicts really just a distraction from the realities of, you know, the world right now with these very precarious and unpredictable economic and social changes? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think what makes them feel a little bit more serious is the way that young people feel disempowered today as all these changes are coming down the pike. I mean, not to be like the gerontocracy guy or banging that drum constantly, but it seems like a lot of the people in charge at high levels or even at like medium levels are going to hang on and they have economic incentives to do so as well. You know, it’s getting more difficult to be a retired person. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so it feels a little like Gen Z and millennials to a lesser extent are through their voices online sort of trying to assert a kind of power that is largely unavailable to them, because our whole lives I think we kind of grew up knowing this tsunami of whatever is coming, whether it’s the AI apocalypse or climate change or whatever is arriving. And it’s like, actually, no, just keep playing on the beach, the adults are going to do something about it. And now it’s sort of like Let us grab the wheel, let us grab the wheel. Come on, guys, and it’s not happening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This whole thing really picked up when Gen Z aged into adulthood and started taking over spaces that had been ruled by millennials. They didn’t just usurp millennial territories, but started carving out new ones too, places that millennials might’ve been hesitant to explore but have eventually settled into. Take TikTok, for example. A Pew Research study last year found that TikTok’s 35 to 49 demographic is actually growing faster than its 18 to 34 users. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But a new faction is gaining power more quickly than millennials or Gen Z ever did. And everyone seems to be a little bit scared of them. They’re built different. They’ve been online since birth. They communicate in emojis before they can even read. And their memes are weirder. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Skibidi Toilet: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What the heck is goin’ on, on, you, on Brrrr Skibidibobobobo, yes, yes Skibidibobo the neem, neem \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s only a matter of time before Gen Alpha takes over the internet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think Gen Z is going to react worse to the rise of Gen Alpha than millennials reacted to the Gen Z. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Why is that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cuz I think for Gen Z, the identity is a little even more tied into the internet than for millennials. I think, for GenZ, they have this sense that, oh, they’re the weirdest, they’re the most special. So I think as Gen Alpha rises and they get into niche memes that Gen Z doesn’t understand, I think that the sense that the meme cultural capital is with Gen Alpha will be much more re-stabilizing. I think Gen Alpha is also much more like, doesn’t need us, and that’s the most annoying thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They’re so self-sufficient. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They don’t need us at all, yeah. They’re like little aliens and they sit there on their iPads or you know watch their Roblox or their Bluey or whatever and there’s just- there’s just no engagement or like need to listen to us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you so much for joining us, Aidan. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you, Morgan. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> Let’s c\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">lose all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s Director of Podcasts and helps edit the show.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram @CloseAllTabsPod, or drop it on Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. And if you’re enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple podcasts or whatever platform you use.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "What's behind \"the Gen Z stare\" — the latest skirmish in the years-long generational war online.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1755108384,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 128,
"wordCount": 6408
},
"headData": {
"title": "Does Gen Z Have A Staring Problem? | KQED",
"description": "Have you heard of the “Gen Z stare”? It’s the blank look some Gen Zers seem to give instead of the usual greetings or small talk—and it’s the latest skirmish in a years-long generation war between Gen Z and Millennials. Internet culture researcher Aidan Walker joins Morgan to trace the origins of this rivalry, unpack what behavioral quirks like “the Gen Z stare” and “the Millennial pause” reveal about each generation’s relationship with technology, and explore why everyone seems to forget about Gen X. ",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "Have you heard of the “Gen Z stare”? It’s the blank look some Gen Zers seem to give instead of the usual greetings or small talk—and it’s the latest skirmish in a years-long generation war between Gen Z and Millennials. Internet culture researcher Aidan Walker joins Morgan to trace the origins of this rivalry, unpack what behavioral quirks like “the Gen Z stare” and “the Millennial pause” reveal about each generation’s relationship with technology, and explore why everyone seems to forget about Gen X. ",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Does Gen Z Have A Staring Problem?",
"datePublished": "2025-08-13T03:00:54-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-08-13T11:06:24-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC5336355522.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"nprStoryId": "kqed-12051989",
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12051989/does-gen-z-have-a-staring-problem",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Have you heard of the “Gen Z stare”? It’s the blank look some Gen Zers seem to give instead of the usual greetings or small talk—and it’s the latest skirmish in a years-long generation war between Gen Z and Millennials. Internet culture researcher Aidan Walker joins Morgan to trace the origins of this rivalry, unpack what behavioral quirks like “the Gen Z stare” and “the Millennial pause” reveal about each generation’s relationship with technology, and explore why everyone seems to forget about Gen X. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC5336355522\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.aidanwalker.info/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aidan Walker\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, independent writer, content creator, and internet culture researcher\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2025/07/18/nx-s1-5468597/gen-z-stare-tiktok-explained-meme-expert-trend-viral\">Is the ‘Gen Z stare’ just a call to look inward?\u003c/a>\u003ci> — \u003c/i>Manuela López Restrepo and Mia Venkat, \u003ci>NPR\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/jul/27/gen-z-stare-its-got-nothing-on-the-gen-x-look-of-dread\">Have you been a victim of the ‘gen Z stare’? It’s got nothing on the gen X look of dread\u003c/a> — Emma Beddington, \u003ci>The Guardian\u003c/i>\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nbcnews.com/pop-culture/pop-culture-news/gen-z-stare-explainer-rcna219262\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen Z is staring at you. It may be more than just a quirk.\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Kalhan Rosenblatt, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NBC News\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We are on the heels of yet another battle. The two factions, once united against a common enemy, have been attacking each other for nearly half a decade. And by attack, I mean they’re calling each other cringe. This is the war between Gen Z and Millennials. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen Z is on the defensive in this latest skirmish as they fight accusations of the Gen Z stare. It’s that blank, glassy gaze that young people have in lieu of socially acceptable small talk. On social media, millennials and Gen Xers have complained about the Gen Z stare in meetings with colleagues, in customer service interactions, and pretty much every social exchange in a public space. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Brooke (@nolablest2020): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re talking about the stare when anyone tries to have just a normal human interaction with you like in the flesh and you guys freeze the f**k up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Katherine Burleson (@katherineburleson0): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">People are going back and forth and Gen Z’s like, “No it’s like an are you serious like are you dumb type of stare.” And other people are like, “No it’s almost like a blank look are you even there?” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">To be fair, sometimes the Gen Z stare is warranted. If you’ve ever worked in customer service, you know exactly what I mean. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Natalie Reynolds (@natalie.reynolds178): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yes, the strawberry banana smoothie does have banana in it, unfortunately. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And Gen Z has been making fun of millennials for years, too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>@she_legacy1: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Have you guys ever noticed that when older people post videos and by older, I mean like, maybe like 35, 40s and on, they always start the video. They wait like one, two, three seconds to make sure it’s filming and then they smile and then they start talking. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Where did this war between Gen Z and Millennials really start? What can this seemingly eternal fight tell us about the ways each generation has been shaped by the internet? And amid all of these petty generational spats, why does everyone forget about Gen X? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist, and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, so I have something to confess. I am a cusper, or zillennial, or whatever you wanna call that generational cohort that was born too late to count as a millennial and too early to really be Gen Z. So in the seemingly eternal war between the two groups, I’ve always been a double agent. Joining me to unpack this generational war today is another double agent, Aidan Walker. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I’d say I’m an internet culture researcher and historian. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In addition to his actual academic research on memes, Aidan also breaks down these cultural trends on TikTok as @Aidanetcetera, and on his sub stack, How To Do Things with Memes. Before we get into this generational warfare, I’m very curious, what generation do you most closely identify with? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m cusp. I’m like between the two. I guess I’m like an elder Gen Z. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Same, I’m like, yeah, either the oldest of the Gen Z or the youngest of the millennials. And in my many years of covering this ongoing warfare, I’ve been a spy for both sides. I’ve faking it this whole time. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I’ll say this, I’m not sure that there’s specific battles in the Gen Z millennial war that are going to be sung of by the bards. I think it’s often been a cold war at certain points. I think its been kind of like a war of attrition. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So we’re going to look at the origins of this cold war, starting with a new tab. The Great Millennial Gen Z War. This war didn’t begin with any public declaration. In fact, this generational tension started way, way before skinny jeans were cringe. Back in 2012, Tide Pods hit the market. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They have bright colors. They look like a kind of heart candy. And it’s just the most delicious thing, but it’s also the forbidden fruit of all time because “They,” capital T, “They” tell you that if you eat a Tide Pod, you will be unalived, as a Gen Z person would say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In the years that followed, poison control centers reported that thousands of young children had eaten the tempting, but deadly, laundry pots. Eating Tide Pods kind of became a joke online. And so, by 2018, the Tide Pot Challenge was born. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Dominic Beesley (@dominicbeesley8589): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> Hey guys, what’s up, Dominic here, and in today’s video I’ll be doing the Tide Pod challenge where you bite into a Tide pod… did you really think i was gonna eat a tide pod?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Media outlets warned parents of the lethal Tide Pod craze sweeping the internet. And although some teenagers did actually record themselves trying to eat TidePods, social media and mainstream press coverage very quickly blew it out of proportion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>News Anchor: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well what began as a social media joke is leading to some serious concerns from doctors tonight. It involves teenagers appearing to eat laundry detergent pods and posting the pictures on social media. Photos show the pods being used as pizza toppings or a bowl of them mixed with bleach for breakfast. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The vast majority of teenagers were not guzzling down Tide Pods, but they were making and liking memes about being tempted by Tide Pods, which only fueled the hysteria. Some millennials, meanwhile, distanced themselves from the antics of Gen Z. This is where we really start to see the rift between generations form online. The relationship was briefly mended in 2019 when the phrase, “okay boomer” blew up. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Peter Kuli and Jedwill: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">He gonna take over the mic. Okay boomer, okay okay boomer. Okay boomer. Okay boomer.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For a few beautiful months, Millennials and Gen Z were a united front against the baby boomers, or really anyone they perceived as a boomer. It was the perfect comeback. If someone online had a bad out-of-touch take, Millennials on Gen Z would hit back with, “okay, boomer.” For a while, there was peace. And then the COVID pandemic started and the internet evolved. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s Corona Time! Hey, it’s Corona time right now! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So COVID is this moment that disrupts all of our lives. For Gen Z, COVID is this thing that happens before your life has really begun. Maybe you’re in high school, maybe you’re college, maybe you are like the first or second year out of college. And it becomes this thing where you’re like entering the world and you see the world ending kind of in a way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But for millennials, I feel like they were maybe a little bit more established. And so it became this sudden, like, ghostly pause where you were working from home for a year or two. And I think for both groups, it was very hard in different ways. But I think it’s when you start to see the glaring difference. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I feel like COVID happened 2020. TikTok is the hottest social media platform and it’s like mostly Gen Z on TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Feelin’ shitty in my bed, didn’t take my fucking meds. The beat, sound to the beat…\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like that’s when Gen Z started to really gain this kind of cultural capital online. How might that start to stoke the tensions between generations? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It changes the format of online culture. It’s now things start on vertical video, then they trickle out to the other platforms. And TikTok is dominated by these young kids, so all these young kids are video editors and they’re able to start putting their own mark on things. I think it really was a moment where suddenly the cutting edge of internet culture is a little bit younger than it was before. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you talk about this resistance that a lot of millennials had to using TikTok at first, if you remember back then? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I remember it because I had that resistance as well. It was the first social media app where I didn’t feel native to it right away. I was just kind of, it’s almost too fast, you know, it had this bad rap, like in the boomer press, people are like, “Oh, it’s Chinese intelligence, mining our data.” And it just sort of felt as if I didn’t t need it in my life, or there would be a bit of a learning curve to get into it. And, uh, of course now I’m, uh… I guess a TikTok influencer to some extent. So I did end up adopting it. But it just was this alienating moment where you sort of realize, “I grew up with the internet and now the internet has grown past me.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We also see fashion trends moving on, like side parts are supposedly out, middle parts are in. Skinny jeans, people are ditching those, like post-COVID, no one wants to wear skinny jeans after quarantine. And moving on from this almost seems like a rejection of like the millennial fashion. How did millennials react to this? Because I didn’t think it was that deep, but if you look at media coverage, it was like, “Oh my God.” You’d expect like a massacre of skinny jeans. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, it is that deep for some people because I think we have such a weird fixation on youth in our culture. So it’s really an existential crisis for people to feel themselves move from like one demographic category to another. You know, you’re sitting there looking at your skinny jeans and you’ve just turned 30. And it’s like, it’s time to let them go. And it not just that you’re going through that sort of private process. It’s that you see someone 10 years younger than you on TikTok when you open your phone mocking you for it. And so I understand why people felt hurt. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Millennials defended themselves with an arsenal of clap back songs? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Alicia Arise (@aliciaarise): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m about to be a millennial with my side part and skinny jeans. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Serena Terry: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So you think we’re old? Well I ain’t having that. We give you wifi and we can take it back \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Mikki Hommel (@mikkihommel.music): \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was born in 1985, side part and and skinny jeans, and I overused the laugh emoji.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By 2022, Gen Z had become very adept at rage-baiting millennials. Rage-bait is exactly what it sounds like. It’s content deliberately made to provoke anger so that viewers respond and it drives up engagement. It’s pivotal in this war between generations. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, anything that is a controversy does well on the internet. That’s like a fundamental law that everybody knows. And so I think why the generational rage bait begins is first of all, it does numbers for those reasons. And secondly, it kind of helps people to establish their own identity. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, this is a time where Gen Z is just distinguishing itself from millennials. And so the way you do that is by, you know, kind of aggressively saying like, “They wear skinny jeans.” Like these sorts of things that may be cosmetic, but you know, when you’re very nascent in figuring out your identity, they mean a lot to you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">By the early 2020s, the difference in the way that millennials and Gen Z interact with the internet and with technology also becomes very clear. There’s the dreaded millennial pause, which is that dead air at the beginning of a video before someone starts talking. Usually it’s because they started recording, but they pause to check that it’s recording and they don’t edit that out. And then there’s the inverse, which is the Gen Z shake. Do you wanna explain what that is? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the Gen Z shake, and I’ve seen millennials do it too, so it’s not just limited to that, is when you start a recording, but you kind of do it in such a way that it seems like you just threw your phone down on the table. Like, suddenly you had this opinion about Taylor Swift and you just couldn’t hold it in. You’re about to head out the door, but you press record and the phone’s not even on the the table, and so the entire screen shakes. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And you sit down and you say, “guys,” and you’re just unburdened yourself. And it’s kind of like a faked casualness because you imagine them. You know, setting the phone down on the table several times, you know, over the course of different takes doing this video. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But what do these two habits, the millennial pause and the Gen Z shake, of which I am both guilty. I mean, honestly, I’ve done both, I’m not gonna lie. But what can they tell us about the way that each generation performs online? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So with the millennial pause, the first thing it tells you is they aren’t as good at editing themselves on video or it isn’t as natural to them. But I think what the millennia pause really says to me is it’s that moment where you see the difference between the offstage persona that is like setting up the recording that is sitting in their kitchen and then the onstage persona that is giving the take that is saying the thing they’ve planned to say. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And because you see that transition, you know that the take is scripted somehow, you know, that it’s the real them, but it’s the them that they’ve curated and made. And it feels almost like someone wearing like an untucked shirt or something to a business meeting. You know, it’s like everybody knows that it doesn’t really matter. But like, you tuck in the shirt, that’s just the way it’s done. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, you go in cap cut and you just shave off your half a second. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, you make it seem seamless so that as a viewer, I can forget that everything is fake. And the Gen Z shake is of course equally fake and inauthentic, but it’s seamless. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Though there have been a few developments in the last year, similar to the skinny jeans debacle, crew socks are very popular with Gen Z. Millennials are very defensive of their ankle socks. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then we also saw millennials taking digs against Gen Z. There was a whole debate over, you know, whether Gen Z is aging faster than millennials did, that kind of thing. And it just feels like every single one of these developments is just like another petty dig that honestly could apply to either generation. What do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think they are petty digs. I think that they tie into real anxieties about aging that people have. I also think it’s worth mentioning that technically generations are fake. They’re a thing we made up. Everything’s a social construct, right? But generations are a little more socially constructed than some other things. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so I think often what we’re dealing with are these anxieties around aging and then anxieties about social media itself and how it’s changing and how fast it’s changing. And people do get a certain amount of like, identity affirmation out of fighting people that aren’t like them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Speaking of identity groups and anxiety about aging, where is Gen X in all of this? We’ll talk about that after this break. Okay, new tab. What about Gen X? Let’s talk about Gen X throwing their hat in the ring, trying to join the fight. Do you remember Gen X Rise? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yes. It was Gen-Xers venerating their own culture’s uniqueness and importance. It was a lot of like Star Wars. It’s a lot like 80s kid type references. It was lot of Gen X, you know, asserting space on the internet. And I can’t really enter into the mindset of a Gen Xer. But I think a piece of it is they probably have always kind of felt outsiders on this. I think a lot of them only got online maybe in like the late 2010s when it became a mainstream adult thing for people to do and then now they want to clean their little corner of it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I just remember from the trend, it was like in the middle of the whole Gen Z-millennial, you know, going at each other and all these making all these petty jabs. And then you’d be scrolling through all these videos of millennials and Gen Z fighting and then the middle would just be like… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen X Rise. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’re here, too, like. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Basically, yeah. And so I just think it’s very funny that Gen Z and Millennials put aside their differences to fight a common enemy. And by fight, I mean make cringe compilations. Can you talk about how cringe is like wielded in generation wars? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cringe is the weapon of choice in Generation Wars, I would say, calling the other side cringe, compiling examples of them having done it and editing it with like a jaunty soundtrack. Cringe like is always in the eye of the beholder, you know, and so you really I think create cringe by having enough beholders agree with you that it is cringe. There is an element to it though, particularly with millennial cringe. That is centered around like seeing through or around the performance. I’m thinking of like the stomp clap music. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>The Lumineers: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Ho! Hey!\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Lumineers style, right. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Lumineers style, that’s sort of become cringe now because it’s so sincere and yet it’s sincere in a way that it’s overly performative. You aren’t from the holler, you’re like a dude in Brooklyn and that’s what gets cringed is when people try too hard. And then the genius of the cringe tactic as an offensive kind of move against an enemy is that because it’s trying too hard if they try to defend themselves, they’re, again, trying too hard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Going back to Gen X Rise and all that, you know, Gen X is so often forgotten online that it’s become a meme in itself. Why do you think that entire generation is, yeah, just so often overlooked and forgotten about online? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think Gen X is forgotten. I think demographically, they’re smaller than the other generations. So that’s one piece of it. Another part of it is that there’s not as much of like a meme trail there. Like one of the weird things about these fights between Gen Z and millennials is that they kind of like make each other through the fight. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, so the things that millennials say, “Oh, that’s a Gen Z trait,” or the things the Gen Z says, “Oh, That’s a millennial trait.” And I don’t know if Gen X was ever that closely watched or faught with by millennials. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I also wonder how much of it is like you can’t use cringe against them as effectively because Gen X just doesn’t have as much of a digital footprint as millennials did. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We don’t have the receipts, yeah. We have like, yeah, we have like the music video of Kurt Cobain, but we don’t have the posts of all the people trying to do grunge culture on- \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When they’re 15 from their bedrooms, we see it in movies, it’s less raw, there’s less of a record and so Gen X escapes scrutiny that way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Once upon a time, older generations referred to millennials as the lazy, entitled generation. But it seems like every time a new generation ages into young adulthood, it’s their turn to be scrutinized. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that brings us back to the most recent skirmish in this generational war. The Gen Z stare. Let’s open a new tab. What’s up with the Gen Z stare? Okay, so let’s talk about the Gen Z stare. What is it? How would you describe it? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the Gen Z stare is just… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s not dead air. Aiden has this vacant slack expression as if he was just factory reset. He’s doing the Gen Z stare. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Blank face. You know, someone’s just looking at you just a long pause and their brain is either buffering or processing or they’re dissociating, staring off into space. The context that people saw it most often come up was like customer service type things. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I guess like the stereotypical interaction would be some millennial or Gen X is like getting a coffee. And then they say they want, you know, sugar in it or something, or like a certain type of pump. And then the barista who’s Gen Z just kind of looks at them. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so it’s this like, they’re not quite housebroken in a way for like public social interactions is the Gen Z stare. You know, they aren’t able to like interface fully or they don’t recognize when it’s their turn to talk essentially. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, a lot of people have blamed like the pandemic as these like this most formative time in childhood development is, but you’re kept in isolation, you know, and your only interactions are online. But you had your own theory, which you posted about. Can you explain that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, my own theory was that if the millennial pause is you’re seeing the shift between offstage to onstage, so they’re performing too much, the Gen Z stare is like a refusal to perform. It is a total like, “Okay, I’m not going to make the small talk. I’m not going to ask the follow-up question. I’m just here and people are gonna help me because I’m in public and I’m here, I’m a customer,” or whatever it is. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve been thinking about it in terms of like, if you go to a downtown of like any major city in the U.S. and you go look at the lunch places, they’re all like slop bowl places for the most part. And you think of how much human interaction actually happens, like you could be ordering from a screen. And the idea is just you go and you get your food, you leave. And I think so many public spaces are like that, that the etiquette is essentially like being on a train or a bus. If you’re on the subway and you don’t really talk to people, like that’s not proper. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And I think it’s almost like Gen Z sees all IRL public space like the subway in a way where it doesn’t make sense, you know, to have a small talk interaction, you know, this sort of asocial — COVID being the intensifier of it, you know, when really we were so distant from each other. I think it’s downstream of that. Like Gen Z just doesn’t see public space the same way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right. I mean, because so much interaction with strangers, with people who aren’t directly in your life just happens online anyway. Whereas previous generations, like, yeah, like I guess boomers and maybe like some Gen Xers were like really into small talk because they didn’t have the internet. They didn’t social media. And now it’s like, well, you’re getting all that interaction anyway, just in a different way. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly, yeah, like the example I said in the video was I was at a cracker barrel at this point, like a month or two ago, and I was traveling on the road to elsewhere. And at the table next to us, like a booth next to us, there’s an older couple sitting there, a man and a woman. And another old man walks by and the two old men recognize each other. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And they start having this small talk conversation about, you know, one guy’s brother going into a home and then sort of they’re catching up. It occurs to me that these two old guys don’t seem to know each other very well. I’m almost imagining that it’s the kind of thing like maybe they went to high school together or something in this same small town and they’ve had a marginal relationship their entire lives, have known of each other’s existence, been in the same network, or maybe they were co-workers somewhere before they were retired. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that this conversation of the two of them talking and taking the time to stop in the cracker barrel to have this pleasantry exchange is actually how this one guy is going to find out about this other guy’s brother going to a home. You know, it’s how they’re going to find out how people they know are doing. It’s how they’re gonna find out what’s happening in the community, because their intel about their social environment is made up of these interactions that happen in these public spaces. Whether it’s Cracker Barrel, whether it’s church, whether, you know, the store. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the fact that Gen Z doesn’t have that, it sort of occurred to me that, you know, I’m not sure I would have that conversation with someone I knew marginally that I went to high school, but I haven’t really talked to since. I would probably pretend I didn’t notice them in a public space. And it’s because if I want that data, I go on Instagram and I see, okay, she’s getting married. Her fiance looks nice. Haven’t seen her in eight years. Happy for her. You know, like there’s this kind of immediacy, but also it happens through the platforms. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know you no longer need these specially made places for it. And so the Cracker Barrel just becomes a place to eat for me. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the Gen Z stare is a refusal to use public space as public space. It’s. Treating it as private space, right? You’re just there to get what you want to get to fulfill the particular function. And you’re not gonna put on the front of saying, oh, how was the weather? How are you doing? If you’re just gonna say, how do I get from point A to point B? And you gonna save your emotional labor, I guess your social presentation for the platforms where you actually have more of a chance to control it and more of chance to choose where it goes and who it’s going to. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What does the Gen Z stare tell us about… us? Well, instead of being expected to perform social niceties all the time, a lot of younger generations choose when and how they want to be perceived. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But maybe there is something lost in the way we socialize now. Everything online is so curated, and there is some thing about the messiness of spontaneous real-life connections that feels very human. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But then again, the Gen Z stare could just be a sign that people are finding this kind of connection online instead. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s be real. Every generation has been hated on and criticized by previous generations. It’s just how things go. But things are different now. The internet and the way we’re constantly consuming and participating in content puts each generation under more of a microscope. It amplifies the tension between each group. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So we often see these arguments end with, you know, Gen Z expressing anger over the current economic and labor conditions that they’ve grown into, you know that they have aged into. But millennials, aren’t necessarily the ones to blame because they also faced very, you now, tumultuous economic and labor conditions when they aged into adulthood. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Gen Z probably hates the boomers more than millennials, just as I’m sure millennials kind of know the boomers are… If you, I think if you were to do polling, that’s what people would say would be my suspicion. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think the economic angle of it is important because if COVID for Gen Z was this moment kind of before their adult life began, where it kind of threw the whole thing in doubt. And for millennials, it was, you know, they, this sort of hard one stability or you know, first few steps on the path of life that suddenly get derailed or jostled around. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So are these markers of cultural conflicts really just a distraction from the realities of, you know, the world right now with these very precarious and unpredictable economic and social changes? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think what makes them feel a little bit more serious is the way that young people feel disempowered today as all these changes are coming down the pike. I mean, not to be like the gerontocracy guy or banging that drum constantly, but it seems like a lot of the people in charge at high levels or even at like medium levels are going to hang on and they have economic incentives to do so as well. You know, it’s getting more difficult to be a retired person. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so it feels a little like Gen Z and millennials to a lesser extent are through their voices online sort of trying to assert a kind of power that is largely unavailable to them, because our whole lives I think we kind of grew up knowing this tsunami of whatever is coming, whether it’s the AI apocalypse or climate change or whatever is arriving. And it’s like, actually, no, just keep playing on the beach, the adults are going to do something about it. And now it’s sort of like Let us grab the wheel, let us grab the wheel. Come on, guys, and it’s not happening. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This whole thing really picked up when Gen Z aged into adulthood and started taking over spaces that had been ruled by millennials. They didn’t just usurp millennial territories, but started carving out new ones too, places that millennials might’ve been hesitant to explore but have eventually settled into. Take TikTok, for example. A Pew Research study last year found that TikTok’s 35 to 49 demographic is actually growing faster than its 18 to 34 users. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But a new faction is gaining power more quickly than millennials or Gen Z ever did. And everyone seems to be a little bit scared of them. They’re built different. They’ve been online since birth. They communicate in emojis before they can even read. And their memes are weirder. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Skibidi Toilet: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What the heck is goin’ on, on, you, on Brrrr Skibidibobobobo, yes, yes Skibidibobo the neem, neem \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s only a matter of time before Gen Alpha takes over the internet. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think Gen Z is going to react worse to the rise of Gen Alpha than millennials reacted to the Gen Z. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Why is that? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Cuz I think for Gen Z, the identity is a little even more tied into the internet than for millennials. I think, for GenZ, they have this sense that, oh, they’re the weirdest, they’re the most special. So I think as Gen Alpha rises and they get into niche memes that Gen Z doesn’t understand, I think that the sense that the meme cultural capital is with Gen Alpha will be much more re-stabilizing. I think Gen Alpha is also much more like, doesn’t need us, and that’s the most annoying thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They’re so self-sufficient. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They don’t need us at all, yeah. They’re like little aliens and they sit there on their iPads or you know watch their Roblox or their Bluey or whatever and there’s just- there’s just no engagement or like need to listen to us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you so much for joining us, Aidan. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Aidan Walker:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you, Morgan. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> Let’s c\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">lose all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s Director of Podcasts and helps edit the show.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram @CloseAllTabsPod, or drop it on Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. And if you’re enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple podcasts or whatever platform you use.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12051989/does-gen-z-have-a-staring-problem",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_22973",
"news_2451",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_35111",
"news_1089",
"news_1631",
"news_29435"
],
"featImg": "news_12051991",
"label": "source_news_12051989"
},
"news_12051056": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12051056",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12051056",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1754474430000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "is-algospeak-coming-for-us",
"title": "Is Algospeak Coming for Us?",
"publishDate": 1754474430,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Is Algospeak Coming for Us? | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Social media creators started using words like “unalive” and “seggs” to dodge algorithmic filters that might suppress “inappropriate” content. But these workarounds aren’t staying online. They’re leaking into real life — like last year, when the Seattle Museum of Pop Culture explained on a placard that Kurt Cobain “unalived” himself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In his new book \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Algospeak\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, linguist and online creator Adam Aleksic argues that algorithms are shaping language in unprecedented ways, and it’s happening quicker than ever. He joins Morgan to explain why euphemisms keep transforming, how “all words are now metadata,” and what his social media persona says about the power of the algorithm to shape the way we speak. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC1778041023\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.etymologynerd.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adam Aleksic\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, linguist, online creator and author of \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Algospeak\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/776856/algospeak-by-adam-aleksic/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Algospeak\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Adam Aleksic\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/culture/376401/r-word-slur-return-euphemism-treadmill-cycle\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The resurgence of the r-word\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Constance Grady, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Vox\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/07/26/us/american-sign-language-changes.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How Sign Language Evolves as Our World Does\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Amanda Morris, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The New York Times\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/12/style/algospeak-etymology-nerd-adam-aleksic-slang.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Harvard-Educated Linguist Breaking Down ‘Skibidi’ and ‘Rizz’\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Callie Holtermann, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The New York Times\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just a note, this episode includes mentions of suicide, so listen with care. A few weeks ago, I went to a gathering called Open Sauce. Open Sauce is kind of like a maker fair, tech convention, and creator meetup all rolled into one. Every summer in the SF Bay area, engineers, fans, YouTubers, and other tech nerds get together and show off what they made. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>RUKA Presenter: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Open source robot hand. It’s 3D printed, off the shelf parts. We just kind of wanted to make robot hands an accessible thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Lucy M.: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">An animatronic Richard Nixon face, so there’s a little fine-tuned GPT-4.1 who thinks he’s Richard Nixon. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tentacle Paradise Presenter: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a tentacle paradise, so we’re doing a rave with tentacles and we have all these different motors that can control three axes and rotations on these tentacles. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Nick Allen, Voicraft: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So this is a nearly six foot tall pocket watch made entirely out of wood. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can I ask why? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Nick Allen, Voicraft: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Why make this? And I, you know, I was, I came home from the workshop one night and I said to my wife, if I am asking the question why and the answer is why not, I feel like I’m on the right track. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So that gives you an idea of what open sauce is like. But I was really there to talk to Adam Aleksic. Online, he’s known as “etymologynerd.” Etymology being the study of how words evolve. You might have seen his videos. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s an emerging nerd dialect among math and CS people in elite American universities and tech companies. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adam isn’t just a language enthusiast, he literally has a linguistics degree from Harvard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They all tend to talk using the same phrases, like non-zero and non-trivial, which come from mathematical proofs but are then applied to unrelated contexts, like, “There exists a non-0 chance we’re out of eggs.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The funny thing is, Adam doesn’t actually sound like that in real life. Here’s how he talks in person. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I go as the etymology nerd online. I make content about linguistics, often covering kind of slang words. I’ve been sort of dabbling in the language communication space since 2016. I got interested just for the fun facts, if I’m being honest. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So that first version of Adam that you just heard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’ll even see this affecting their grammatical structures, like they’ll say such that instead of so that simply because such that is used more in mathematical language. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s just Adam using his educator, creator voice. It’s a form of algospeak. That’s a play on algorithm and speech. Algospeak usually refers to the coded language that people use online to evade content moderation filters. Think of the way TikTok users say “unalive” because words like “kill” and “die” and “suicide” are suppressed. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 1: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What happens to people who unalived themselves? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 2: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rammed through a car unaliving six people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 3: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whether or not somebody really wants to unalive themselves or not.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 4: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She ends up dating her neighbor who ends up being, secretly, the town serial unaliver. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adam recently wrote a book called Algospeak, and in it, he argues that this phenomenon is bigger than self-censorship. The way that people change their speech patterns to grab your attention, like he does in his videos, the evolution of slang words online, people making language choices to optimize for social media algorithms, all of this is Algospeak. We’re seeing words like “unalive” not just online, but in real life conversations too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how does Algospeak make that jump into our offline lexicon? And should we be worried that a handful of tech platforms have this much influence on language? What I’m really asking is, are we cooked? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open a new tab. Where did algospeak come from? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The phrase “algospeak” is relatively new. It really came about when TikTok took off in the U.S. Around 2019. TikTok uses automated content moderation and is notorious for over policing sensitive topics like conversations about mental health. Words like “kill” or “die” or “suicide” are loaded. Those words might be used when people talk about the news or moments in history or mental health treatment or grief. But sometimes people might use those words threateningly and the content filters aren’t great at telling the difference. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Videos using those words might be flagged or taken down. Some creators also fear getting “shadow banned.” That’s when someone’s content isn’t getting as much engagement as usual because of a content violation, but they don’t get an official warning. So to keep talking about these topics, people online came up with new words. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">An infamous example is the phrase, “Kermit Sewerslide.” But “unalive” has been the one that’s stuck. While algospeak is relatively new, humanity has softened language around difficult topics throughout history, like using the word deceased instead of die. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, deceased comes from the Latin word for departure. Unalive comes from a 2013 Spider-Man meme that got turned into a Roblox meme. So there’s something a little bit funnier about the word unalive, and I think that’s what’s a little off-putting to people who are uncomfortable with that word that we’re finding the silly way to talk about death. The euphemism part is not new, and we have kids in middle schools actually writing essays about Hamlet contemplating unaliving himself right now. So that’s not new that we are finding new ways to talk death because we’re uncomfortable talking about it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think the widespread pervasiveness of this on social media is because of its mimetic quality as well, that it is a funny word and it’s spread because it was an internet trend. It also spread because of how the internet creates in groups. So it spread through the mental health community on TikTok, particularly as a way to build resources and share their stories. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Interesting, yeah. I mean, yeah, how is the all-pervasive, all-knowing algorithm shaping the way that we speak when it comes to euphemisms like unalive? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The most important thing that I would try to emphasize is that all words are metadata right now in the past metadata is like hashtags information about the content at this point. We have natural language processing algorithms taking every single word that’s spoken and appears on screen in your video. They turn that into a piece of information. So every single words a piece information about content and that means savvy creators use their language very deliberately. They use language in a way that generates more comments more engagement, improves user retention. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s clear that some words are better at grabbing our attention than other words. If a word is trending, creators will tap into it because they’re trying to hijack that trend. At the same time, because they know that some words will tell the algorithm, “Oh, this video is not going to not something we want to conform to our platform best practices,” whatever. They’ll reroute their language. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ve seen this kind of thing over and over again. Back in the 1800s, a guy named William Bowdler published a version of William Shakespeare’s plays that replaced anything raunchy or offensive with language that he deemed, “More suitable for women and children.” So in Shakespeare’s Othello, there’s this iconic line. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Iago: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Your daughter and the Moore are making the beast with two backs! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s a euphemism for sex, right? But in Bowdler’s version, Iago says. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Iago: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Your daughter and the Moore are now… together. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which just doesn’t hit the same. Bowdler’s version… sucked. So much so that we now have a word, bowdlerization, to describe removing or modifying, quote, inappropriate content. Back in the early 1900s, artists replaced expletives with other symbols so their comics could still be printed in newspapers. That’s bowdlarization at work. And then in the 1980s, we got the internet. The early, early forums started taking off. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, as early as the 1980s, we saw “leet speak.” There was just very basic text filters of certain words, and people would find ways to evade that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s LEET, L-E-E T. It’s a play on “elite,” as in having elite status on bulletin board systems back in the 80s. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Instead of the word porn, people would write pr0n, and the O would be like a zero. Sometimes the letters would be substituted with similar looking letters, that’d be a very common one. Sometimes there’d be just like intentional misspellings. The difference between the internet and this new algorithmic era, I think, is a massive infrastructural shift that’s affecting how we communicate. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">S\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">o first of all, internet was massive in terms of allowing for the written replication of informal speech. Now more people can have voices. And in the same way sort of algorithms and platforms on social media allow for people who didn’t have a voice in the past to have a voice they can have some positive effects — I think it’s a new tool for using language and every tool has good and bad applications — but we have to remember that unlike the decentralized internet, there’s three companies running short form video. We’re in this kind of panopticon. We can’t separate that from how we’re communicating right now. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of our communication is baked into these platform structures that they’ve created that incentivize creators to mold their speech around what they want. So you can’t say sex on TikTok, for example. It’ll be suppressed. You’re not sure how many people it will be sent to. So you hyper-correct. There’s doctors and sex educators who will use the word “seggs” instead. The hashtag “seggs education” has 40,000 uses on TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But more than that, when you’re an educator online and I try to make educational content, I have to package it into sort of a mimetic kind of quality. And this is something you’ve always had as a teacher like to capture your students attention. This has always been true. You’ve had to make the lesson entertaining for your children. I do think algorithms compound and amplify natural human behavior. And there’s more of a need to get people’s attention because you’re competing against every single other thing on the platform, like, that could potentially grab your attention more. So everything’s “edutainment.” There’s no like entertainment versus education. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You mentioned, you know, even the word unalive, even that is becoming censored now, which makes me wonder how effective is algospeak and bowdlerization really when it comes to these very sophisticated moderation that the platforms are using? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The analogy I use in the book is linguistic whack-a-mole. So you have a mallet coming down, that’s the algorithm censoring something. And then the new mole pops up, which is humans finding a way to talk about that. And I believe that humans are incredibly tenacious at coming up with new language, finding new ways to express themselves. It’s what we call a productive force in linguistics, something that produces more language. The fact that these algorithms are here mean we’re producing more euphemisms than we otherwise would be. In other ways, the fact that the algorithms create in groups means that these in groups now have a shared need to invent new slang and spread it so everything about the algorithms is making the words happen faster and more intensely than in the past. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How does this sort of self-censorship and this need to even optimize your language, how does that affect the way that you talk about linguistics online? How does that effect the way you talk sensitive topics, especially when it comes to like conflicts in Gaza or sex? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, well, famously, the watermelon emoji stands in for the Palestinian flag. But at the same time, that comes out of an actual cultural legacy of people using the watermelon because they were banned from using the Palestinian flag during previous conflicts with Israel. So that was a literal example of people, using this signal to circumvent some kind of censorship. Now, it’s been taken in this new context, it evolved into a new sociological condition, but it’s still used to evade censorship. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, like the algorithm is not transparent at all. It’s like, you don’t know whether or not something’s gonna work until after the fact, until you check your traffic after you’ve posted it. Does that disincentivize talking about sensitive topics, knowing that you have to like play this sort of linguistic whack-a-mole or like, I don’t, dodge these censors? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Possibly, there’s a kind of a practice called “Voldemorting,” which is skirting around a topic. It’s called Voldermorting because, much like in the series Harry Potter, you can’t say the name Voldemort, or there’s the fear of saying the name, Voldemort, so people circumvent that with phrases like, “He who must not be named.” So one creator that I talked about, he wrote about Hitler as the “top guy of the Germans,” because you don’t wanna say Hitler, but you circumvent enough that there’s no chance the algorithm is gonna pick up on that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That practice of coming up with new, creative ways to say something taboo is called “the euphemism treadmill.” This was a phrase coined by Canadian psychologist and author Stephen Pinker. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The idea that once a euphemism gets bleached enough, that means it loses its original meaning, we find a new euphemisms to replace it. So the words idiot, imbecile, and moron used to be actual scientific classifications for people with mental disabilities, but that became like clearly pejorated meaning it took on a negative connotation. And then we moved on by making new terms like the “r slur” which also became pretty bad and we keep coming up with new words because it’s seen as negative, it keeps getting turned into an insult. And we have to find new ways to talk about these ideas. And you know, even now, like autistic, some people use it as a slur or like in an insulting capacity. That’s the euphemism treadmill, we definitely see that happening and accelerated by the algorithm. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, I’ve seen this exact thing happen with the word lesbian becoming “le dollar bean” becoming now woman loving woman, and where the word lesbians is almost pejorative. I guess, how does the euphemism treadmill affect the way that we talk about identity? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, women loving women is a great example because a lot of people don’t even realize that’s algospeak. It’s so effective at replacing something that — we don’t know how much the algorithm is suppressing discussion of LGBT rights, but it seems to be to some degree, and certainly we know in regions of like the Middle East, you can’t talk about this stuff — so there’s reason to distrust it. I think people over-correct and then end up changing language as a result. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The identity formation thing is a fascinating rabbit hole because the existence of a category can definitionally change your identity. You either identify with this category or against it. And I think social media brings us more categories than we had in the past. There’s a lot of micro labels that were trending on Tumblr, like different genders and different sexual orientations, and even fashion-wise, like different aesthetic micro labels. You could be Cottagecore, Goblincore, Clean Girl Coquette. All of these are like now labels that exist that didn’t exist as much before. Again, they were sort of on Tumblr. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But the algorithm really popularized them and now they’re more in the popular consciousness than in the past. And now when I’m defining my fashion identity, I could have just liked earth tones in the pass, but now I need to figure out whether I’m goblincore or whatever. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s all marketing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But now I’m like putting myself in maybe a narrower box than I was before. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Last year, the Seattle Museum of Pop Culture got a lot of heat for how it presented its Nirvana exhibit. It included a placard about the 27 Club, a group of artists who have all passed away at 27. Nirvana’s front man, Kurt Cobain, died by suicide at that age, but the exhibit said he “Unalived himself at 27.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how did this algospeak phrase end up in a real life physical museum? Let’s get into algospeak moving offline after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How did the term unalive end up in a real museum? \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When algospeak goes mainstream. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So more and more, we’re seeing algospeak break out of online spaces and ooze into real life conversations. For your book, you interviewed teachers about kids using the word unalive unironically. How does this happen? Do those kids know why they’re saying the word, unalive? Do they know that they’re using algospeak? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think a very important thing to think about is context collapse, the idea that we don’t know where some words are coming from. They’re often reinterpreted in a new way once you see it coming from a new context or when you’re not the perceived audience, like the fact that unalive is being used offline. Some kids didn’t know that was a word for internet censorship at all. They hear it from their friends. They hear from creators, but at the same time, they didn’t that the creators are using it for this purpose. There’s a lot of reasons why we lose context, and when we lose context, that’s how we forget the etymology. When we forget the etymology, that’s how words change meaning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, we always see posts of people saying like, “Oh, this white creator is faking a Blaccent.” And those, they may insist that they’re not, they’re just using internet lingo. How does context collapse play in that kind of scenario? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, Blaccent is different. That’s sort of actual intonations and speech patterns. And it’s very hard to accidentally start using that particularly. But individual words, perhaps, you really might not know unless you’re super tapped into etymology, like that slay, serve, queen, cooked, ate, bet, you know, cap. All of this comes from Black slang. And then you replicate it. And the words were originally created as a sort of identity forming mechanism, again, because language is a tool for identity building. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it was created in this community that needed a way to build identity away from the straight white norms of the English language. A lot of this was from the ballroom slang in New York City in the 1980s. And then it sort of gets repurposed and it loses that power in the original community. Now they have a need to come up with more words and now we’re back in treadmill territory. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That euphemism treadmill applies to pretty much every marginalized group online. Like how instead of saying “autistic,” people might use “acoustic” or “neuro-spicy” or “touch of the ’tism.” Autistic creators use these phrases in conversations with other autistic creators to evade filters and as a tongue-in-cheek way to identify others who have had similar experiences. But those terms spread and broke into the mainstream. And with that, context collapse. When in-group language goes mainstream, outsiders might use it pejoratively against the community that created those words. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I don’t think, I think at this point, we’ve stopped saying that or I was never saying that I think it was always kind of strange. It was coined inside the autistic community and the mental health spaces as a way to kind of just poke fun at autism, but for themselves. And then let’s say like, I dunno, like, this is also a natural human phenomenon. Let’s say you are a relative of someone who’s autistic. Is it okay to use that word? Maybe, maybe. You’re, you know, you’re close to the culture. You really do care about it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But now, now you’re a relative using it and you might say it and someone else might hear from you and think it’s fine to say it themselves. And then that’s how context collapse occurs. With acoustic, it’s one of those funny TikTok words as well that made it more spreadable as a meme. That made it easier to turn negative because it’s just a joke, right? Jokes can like tread into edgy territory. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, when I was reading your book, you bring up a similar thought with, you know, the words “fruity” and “zesty.” And it really reminded me of, I don’t know if you remember in the 2000s, there was this Hilary Duff PSA where it’s like, “You can’t say that top is gay.” And you know and she’s like, “Why are you using gay as an insult?” And yet on TikTok, I always see people saying like, “Wow, looking fruity today.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, yeah. Well, and often I don’t think that’s that negative, but it can be in like a different context. Right. Yeah, like a bully calling someone like fruity while shoving them into a locker is a different context, and now it’s entirely the context with how that word is perceived. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So thanks to the internet, language is undeniably changing. We’re seeing the development of the influencer accent intertwined with the way that American Sign Language is changing. Aside from self-censorship. How else have you seen language change? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, the sign language example is really interesting. I’d like to elaborate on that real quick. Yeah, please go. The fact that people are signing in a tighter box because that’s what the movements that fit on the phone screen are, the fact that like the word for dog used to be like patting your hip and now it’s like higher up because you couldn’t see that on a phone screen as well, or like there’s more one-handed signing than in the past. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All that is kind of like where sign language is going. And that’s again, we can literally see the constraints of the phone molding sign language. And yet, why wouldn’t it be happening with other versions of language as well? The influencer accent, right? These different intonations we have for speaking online simply because they’re more compelling ways to talk for that medium. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you give an example of the influencer accent? Do a, like, do your impression. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s the standard lifestyle influencer like the hey guys welcome to NPR like that kind of kind of rising tone that keeps you paying attention. It’s there’s nothing worse than dead air on the internet and it sort of like fills space and also keeps you kind of the uptalk makes you want to know what’s coming next. I use a different kind of accent I use the educational influencer accent. So I’ll stress more words to keep you watching my video talk faster all that kind of yeah? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, how are you seeing language change and be optimized and algospeaked almost. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, it’s all algorithmic optimization. In the past, you’d have stuff like search engine optimization where people would stuff metadata in a certain way to make their pages rank higher on Google. When I say that all words are metadata though, I can’t emphasize that strongly enough. Because if SEO was a thing people did in the past to get their pages to rank higher, algorithmic optimizations is what we’re doing now. And that means every single word plays a part. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The fact that this handful of tech platforms have such immense influence on the way that we communicate does genuinely freak me out, because clearly this is bigger than internet slang. If our speech patterns are getting molded into what’s best for the algorithm, then what else are we unconsciously optimizing? The way we think? The way process feelings? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I have one last tab to open. Chat, are we cook? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I always see discourse about language and how the internet is ruining language, how algorithms are ruining language, we’re losing our roots. You know, a lot of that kind of, you know, hand-wringing. In your professional opinion, as a linguist with a degree, are we cooked? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, that’s the last chapter title. I want to first separate language from culture, which maybe is not a correct distinction, but let’s look at language first. There’s nothing ever wrong with one word more than another word, right? There’s no such thing as brain rot for individual words. Words are just like there, you know, and then we can use them for good or bad. That’s where culture comes in. Yeah, neurologically speaking, no word is rotting your brain. So as a linguist, I really want to emphasize that, put that aside. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Language is, however, a proxy for culture. You can see how culture’s shifting with language and culture to me is an individual subjective thing. It seems pretty bad to me that our language is evolving under the auspices of these greedy monetizing platforms that are trying to commodify our attention. And maybe, hey, we can look at literally how language is rerouting to change that maybe be more aware of that and maybe spend less time on these platforms or give less power to what they’re saying. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the fact that these platforms are incentivizing grabbing user attention, creators now, they’re just trying to make a living, they are trying to get attention themselves, they replicate these sort of platform structures. And you can see how also changes in weighting affect the distribution of content and messaging. Instagram, after Trump got elected, went super racist. I was on Reels before and after, and all of a sudden there’s this really racist AI slop down my feet and how did that happen? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s like on another level. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, they change something in the inputs, they change something about what they’re filtering out. And now we’re getting all different content and maybe shifting the overton window of acceptable ideas in a different direction. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So going back to your own content, you’re covering very complex, nuanced topics and adapting them to be approachable for the average non-linguist scroller. What have you learned about making this kind of information compelling for anyone? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mentioned edutainment. It’s very important that you package things inside other things that are more compelling, find mediums that work better for certain messages. So it works for me because I am actually academically analyzing where slang words come from. But at the same time, it’s just funny that I’m talking about skibidi toilet and people will-\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Put Harvard degree to work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s funny because people, you know, recognize that it’s funny, but it’s serious at the same time. So by packaging something serious inside something funny, I can maybe have an impact here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is the algospeak practice you maybe unconsciously used and caught yourself, you know, using in your own content? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve thought about this a lot with the influencer accent because part of it is conscious, part of it, is, “Alright, I’m going to try to stress certain words right now.” At the same time, an accent is not something you can consciously maintain all the time. It’s like a subconscious thing that you uphold simply because it’s like building a habit or routine. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Once you do it enough, you sort of slip into it naturally. At this point, you know, I’ve sort of trained myself into it by looking at retention rates and seeing what works and thinking about it critically. But at the same time, when I’m actually filming, I’m not thinking about all these things. I just go into a routine and I film my video and I’ve subconsciously done the influencer accent. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, it’s funny you mention that. I have caught myself doing the same thing where I, the voice I am using on the show is very different from the voice I use when I have to make social videos for the show. But it’s true. You are being perceived very differently. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The analogy I like for the influencer accent is broadcast TV, like TV broadcasters will use a different tone of speech. “This just in,” you know, “Breaking news,” like they’ll talk differently than they do in real life, and that’s normal because they’re accommodating for that medium. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You can hear this in the public radio accent too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Derry Murbles: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Welcome to Thoughts for your Thoughts. I’m Derry Murbles filling in for David Parker. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, that’s a parody of the NPR accent from Parks and Rec, but it sounds familiar, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Derry Murbles: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Join us next week when David Bianculli will be filling in for Richard Chang Jefferson, who will be filing in for me. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right. Well, this is sort of like audience design again. There’s an expected idea of what to perceive. Audience design is an actual concept in linguistics that you are accommodating your speech for your perceived imaginary audience. And that’s what the TV people do. That’s what influencers do. And that what NPR people are doing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So there’s an idea about what a cultured NPR accent sounds like, and then you do it. Occasionally I get like too into like talking about something and then people are like, “You’re using your influencer accent.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. All right, last last question for real. What is the big takeaway you want people to walk away with from your book? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Two big takeaways, one, algorithms are a new medium that are affecting every aspect of how language changes right now. Two, now that you’re aware of these things, now that your more critically informed, hopefully make your own choices about how to use language. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks so much for joining us. I have started to think about the ways that I unconsciously incorporate algospeak into my day-to-day speech. And that, maybe, for the sake of the algorithm, I should be more intentional about using it on the show. When we started developing this podcast, I did play around with the NPR accent. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">From KQED studios and the depths of the internet, it’s time to close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that felt weird, but maybe I’ll give the influencer accent a go. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey, tabbers, you’ll never guess what we’re doing now. We’re closing all of these tabs.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Or I’ll try Adam’s educator-creator accent? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey, fun fact! Did you know we’re at the end of the episode, and that means it’s time to close all these tabs? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But you know what? For now, I’ll stick with my own. Let’s close all of these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s Director of Podcasts and helps edit the show.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at CloseAllTabs@KQED.org. Follow us on instagram @CloseAllTabsPod Or drop it on Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. And if you’re enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple podcasts or whatever platform you use.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Linguist and online creator Adam Aleksic argues that social media algorithms are shaping language in unprecedented ways.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1755110623,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 127,
"wordCount": 6327
},
"headData": {
"title": "Is Algospeak Coming for Us? | KQED",
"description": "Words like “unalived” and “seggs” started as ways for social media creators to dodge algorithmic filters that might suppress content using the words “kill” and “sex.” But these workarounds aren’t staying online. They’re leaking into real life — like when the Seattle Museum of Pop Culture explained on a placard that Kurt Cobain “unalived” himself. In his new book Algospeak, linguist and online creator Adam Aleksic argues that algorithms are shaping language in unprecedented ways, and it’s happening quicker than ever. He joins Morgan to explain why euphemisms keep transforming, how “all words are now metadata,” and what his social media persona says about the power of the algorithm to shape the way we speak.",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "Words like “unalived” and “seggs” started as ways for social media creators to dodge algorithmic filters that might suppress content using the words “kill” and “sex.” But these workarounds aren’t staying online. They’re leaking into real life — like when the Seattle Museum of Pop Culture explained on a placard that Kurt Cobain “unalived” himself. In his new book Algospeak, linguist and online creator Adam Aleksic argues that algorithms are shaping language in unprecedented ways, and it’s happening quicker than ever. He joins Morgan to explain why euphemisms keep transforming, how “all words are now metadata,” and what his social media persona says about the power of the algorithm to shape the way we speak.",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Is Algospeak Coming for Us?",
"datePublished": "2025-08-06T03:00:30-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-08-13T11:43:43-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC1778041023.mp3",
"sticky": false,
"nprStoryId": "kqed-12051056",
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/12051056/is-algospeak-coming-for-us",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Social media creators started using words like “unalive” and “seggs” to dodge algorithmic filters that might suppress “inappropriate” content. But these workarounds aren’t staying online. They’re leaking into real life — like last year, when the Seattle Museum of Pop Culture explained on a placard that Kurt Cobain “unalived” himself. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In his new book \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Algospeak\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, linguist and online creator Adam Aleksic argues that algorithms are shaping language in unprecedented ways, and it’s happening quicker than ever. He joins Morgan to explain why euphemisms keep transforming, how “all words are now metadata,” and what his social media persona says about the power of the algorithm to shape the way we speak. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC1778041023\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.etymologynerd.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adam Aleksic\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, linguist, online creator and author of \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Algospeak\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.penguinrandomhouse.com/books/776856/algospeak-by-adam-aleksic/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Algospeak\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Adam Aleksic\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.vox.com/culture/376401/r-word-slur-return-euphemism-treadmill-cycle\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The resurgence of the r-word\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Constance Grady, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Vox\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2022/07/26/us/american-sign-language-changes.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How Sign Language Evolves as Our World Does\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Amanda Morris, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The New York Times\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/12/style/algospeak-etymology-nerd-adam-aleksic-slang.html\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Harvard-Educated Linguist Breaking Down ‘Skibidi’ and ‘Rizz’\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Callie Holtermann, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The New York Times\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Just a note, this episode includes mentions of suicide, so listen with care. A few weeks ago, I went to a gathering called Open Sauce. Open Sauce is kind of like a maker fair, tech convention, and creator meetup all rolled into one. Every summer in the SF Bay area, engineers, fans, YouTubers, and other tech nerds get together and show off what they made. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>RUKA Presenter: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Open source robot hand. It’s 3D printed, off the shelf parts. We just kind of wanted to make robot hands an accessible thing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Lucy M.: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">An animatronic Richard Nixon face, so there’s a little fine-tuned GPT-4.1 who thinks he’s Richard Nixon. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Tentacle Paradise Presenter: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is a tentacle paradise, so we’re doing a rave with tentacles and we have all these different motors that can control three axes and rotations on these tentacles. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Nick Allen, Voicraft: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So this is a nearly six foot tall pocket watch made entirely out of wood. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can I ask why? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Nick Allen, Voicraft: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Why make this? And I, you know, I was, I came home from the workshop one night and I said to my wife, if I am asking the question why and the answer is why not, I feel like I’m on the right track. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So that gives you an idea of what open sauce is like. But I was really there to talk to Adam Aleksic. Online, he’s known as “etymologynerd.” Etymology being the study of how words evolve. You might have seen his videos. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s an emerging nerd dialect among math and CS people in elite American universities and tech companies. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adam isn’t just a language enthusiast, he literally has a linguistics degree from Harvard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">They all tend to talk using the same phrases, like non-zero and non-trivial, which come from mathematical proofs but are then applied to unrelated contexts, like, “There exists a non-0 chance we’re out of eggs.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The funny thing is, Adam doesn’t actually sound like that in real life. Here’s how he talks in person. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I go as the etymology nerd online. I make content about linguistics, often covering kind of slang words. I’ve been sort of dabbling in the language communication space since 2016. I got interested just for the fun facts, if I’m being honest. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So that first version of Adam that you just heard. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You’ll even see this affecting their grammatical structures, like they’ll say such that instead of so that simply because such that is used more in mathematical language. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s just Adam using his educator, creator voice. It’s a form of algospeak. That’s a play on algorithm and speech. Algospeak usually refers to the coded language that people use online to evade content moderation filters. Think of the way TikTok users say “unalive” because words like “kill” and “die” and “suicide” are suppressed. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 1: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What happens to people who unalived themselves? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 2: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rammed through a car unaliving six people. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 3: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Whether or not somebody really wants to unalive themselves or not.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>TikTok Creator 4: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She ends up dating her neighbor who ends up being, secretly, the town serial unaliver. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Adam recently wrote a book called Algospeak, and in it, he argues that this phenomenon is bigger than self-censorship. The way that people change their speech patterns to grab your attention, like he does in his videos, the evolution of slang words online, people making language choices to optimize for social media algorithms, all of this is Algospeak. We’re seeing words like “unalive” not just online, but in real life conversations too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how does Algospeak make that jump into our offline lexicon? And should we be worried that a handful of tech platforms have this much influence on language? What I’m really asking is, are we cooked? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This is Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Let’s get into it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Let’s open a new tab. Where did algospeak come from? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The phrase “algospeak” is relatively new. It really came about when TikTok took off in the U.S. Around 2019. TikTok uses automated content moderation and is notorious for over policing sensitive topics like conversations about mental health. Words like “kill” or “die” or “suicide” are loaded. Those words might be used when people talk about the news or moments in history or mental health treatment or grief. But sometimes people might use those words threateningly and the content filters aren’t great at telling the difference. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Videos using those words might be flagged or taken down. Some creators also fear getting “shadow banned.” That’s when someone’s content isn’t getting as much engagement as usual because of a content violation, but they don’t get an official warning. So to keep talking about these topics, people online came up with new words. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">An infamous example is the phrase, “Kermit Sewerslide.” But “unalive” has been the one that’s stuck. While algospeak is relatively new, humanity has softened language around difficult topics throughout history, like using the word deceased instead of die. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, deceased comes from the Latin word for departure. Unalive comes from a 2013 Spider-Man meme that got turned into a Roblox meme. So there’s something a little bit funnier about the word unalive, and I think that’s what’s a little off-putting to people who are uncomfortable with that word that we’re finding the silly way to talk about death. The euphemism part is not new, and we have kids in middle schools actually writing essays about Hamlet contemplating unaliving himself right now. So that’s not new that we are finding new ways to talk death because we’re uncomfortable talking about it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But I think the widespread pervasiveness of this on social media is because of its mimetic quality as well, that it is a funny word and it’s spread because it was an internet trend. It also spread because of how the internet creates in groups. So it spread through the mental health community on TikTok, particularly as a way to build resources and share their stories. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Interesting, yeah. I mean, yeah, how is the all-pervasive, all-knowing algorithm shaping the way that we speak when it comes to euphemisms like unalive? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The most important thing that I would try to emphasize is that all words are metadata right now in the past metadata is like hashtags information about the content at this point. We have natural language processing algorithms taking every single word that’s spoken and appears on screen in your video. They turn that into a piece of information. So every single words a piece information about content and that means savvy creators use their language very deliberately. They use language in a way that generates more comments more engagement, improves user retention. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s clear that some words are better at grabbing our attention than other words. If a word is trending, creators will tap into it because they’re trying to hijack that trend. At the same time, because they know that some words will tell the algorithm, “Oh, this video is not going to not something we want to conform to our platform best practices,” whatever. They’ll reroute their language. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We’ve seen this kind of thing over and over again. Back in the 1800s, a guy named William Bowdler published a version of William Shakespeare’s plays that replaced anything raunchy or offensive with language that he deemed, “More suitable for women and children.” So in Shakespeare’s Othello, there’s this iconic line. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Iago: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Your daughter and the Moore are making the beast with two backs! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s a euphemism for sex, right? But in Bowdler’s version, Iago says. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Iago: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Your daughter and the Moore are now… together. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Which just doesn’t hit the same. Bowdler’s version… sucked. So much so that we now have a word, bowdlerization, to describe removing or modifying, quote, inappropriate content. Back in the early 1900s, artists replaced expletives with other symbols so their comics could still be printed in newspapers. That’s bowdlarization at work. And then in the 1980s, we got the internet. The early, early forums started taking off. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, as early as the 1980s, we saw “leet speak.” There was just very basic text filters of certain words, and people would find ways to evade that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s LEET, L-E-E T. It’s a play on “elite,” as in having elite status on bulletin board systems back in the 80s. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Instead of the word porn, people would write pr0n, and the O would be like a zero. Sometimes the letters would be substituted with similar looking letters, that’d be a very common one. Sometimes there’d be just like intentional misspellings. The difference between the internet and this new algorithmic era, I think, is a massive infrastructural shift that’s affecting how we communicate. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">S\u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">o first of all, internet was massive in terms of allowing for the written replication of informal speech. Now more people can have voices. And in the same way sort of algorithms and platforms on social media allow for people who didn’t have a voice in the past to have a voice they can have some positive effects — I think it’s a new tool for using language and every tool has good and bad applications — but we have to remember that unlike the decentralized internet, there’s three companies running short form video. We’re in this kind of panopticon. We can’t separate that from how we’re communicating right now. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All of our communication is baked into these platform structures that they’ve created that incentivize creators to mold their speech around what they want. So you can’t say sex on TikTok, for example. It’ll be suppressed. You’re not sure how many people it will be sent to. So you hyper-correct. There’s doctors and sex educators who will use the word “seggs” instead. The hashtag “seggs education” has 40,000 uses on TikTok. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But more than that, when you’re an educator online and I try to make educational content, I have to package it into sort of a mimetic kind of quality. And this is something you’ve always had as a teacher like to capture your students attention. This has always been true. You’ve had to make the lesson entertaining for your children. I do think algorithms compound and amplify natural human behavior. And there’s more of a need to get people’s attention because you’re competing against every single other thing on the platform, like, that could potentially grab your attention more. So everything’s “edutainment.” There’s no like entertainment versus education. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You mentioned, you know, even the word unalive, even that is becoming censored now, which makes me wonder how effective is algospeak and bowdlerization really when it comes to these very sophisticated moderation that the platforms are using? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The analogy I use in the book is linguistic whack-a-mole. So you have a mallet coming down, that’s the algorithm censoring something. And then the new mole pops up, which is humans finding a way to talk about that. And I believe that humans are incredibly tenacious at coming up with new language, finding new ways to express themselves. It’s what we call a productive force in linguistics, something that produces more language. The fact that these algorithms are here mean we’re producing more euphemisms than we otherwise would be. In other ways, the fact that the algorithms create in groups means that these in groups now have a shared need to invent new slang and spread it so everything about the algorithms is making the words happen faster and more intensely than in the past. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How does this sort of self-censorship and this need to even optimize your language, how does that affect the way that you talk about linguistics online? How does that effect the way you talk sensitive topics, especially when it comes to like conflicts in Gaza or sex? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, well, famously, the watermelon emoji stands in for the Palestinian flag. But at the same time, that comes out of an actual cultural legacy of people using the watermelon because they were banned from using the Palestinian flag during previous conflicts with Israel. So that was a literal example of people, using this signal to circumvent some kind of censorship. Now, it’s been taken in this new context, it evolved into a new sociological condition, but it’s still used to evade censorship. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, like the algorithm is not transparent at all. It’s like, you don’t know whether or not something’s gonna work until after the fact, until you check your traffic after you’ve posted it. Does that disincentivize talking about sensitive topics, knowing that you have to like play this sort of linguistic whack-a-mole or like, I don’t, dodge these censors? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Possibly, there’s a kind of a practice called “Voldemorting,” which is skirting around a topic. It’s called Voldermorting because, much like in the series Harry Potter, you can’t say the name Voldemort, or there’s the fear of saying the name, Voldemort, so people circumvent that with phrases like, “He who must not be named.” So one creator that I talked about, he wrote about Hitler as the “top guy of the Germans,” because you don’t wanna say Hitler, but you circumvent enough that there’s no chance the algorithm is gonna pick up on that. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That practice of coming up with new, creative ways to say something taboo is called “the euphemism treadmill.” This was a phrase coined by Canadian psychologist and author Stephen Pinker. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The idea that once a euphemism gets bleached enough, that means it loses its original meaning, we find a new euphemisms to replace it. So the words idiot, imbecile, and moron used to be actual scientific classifications for people with mental disabilities, but that became like clearly pejorated meaning it took on a negative connotation. And then we moved on by making new terms like the “r slur” which also became pretty bad and we keep coming up with new words because it’s seen as negative, it keeps getting turned into an insult. And we have to find new ways to talk about these ideas. And you know, even now, like autistic, some people use it as a slur or like in an insulting capacity. That’s the euphemism treadmill, we definitely see that happening and accelerated by the algorithm. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, I’ve seen this exact thing happen with the word lesbian becoming “le dollar bean” becoming now woman loving woman, and where the word lesbians is almost pejorative. I guess, how does the euphemism treadmill affect the way that we talk about identity? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, women loving women is a great example because a lot of people don’t even realize that’s algospeak. It’s so effective at replacing something that — we don’t know how much the algorithm is suppressing discussion of LGBT rights, but it seems to be to some degree, and certainly we know in regions of like the Middle East, you can’t talk about this stuff — so there’s reason to distrust it. I think people over-correct and then end up changing language as a result. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The identity formation thing is a fascinating rabbit hole because the existence of a category can definitionally change your identity. You either identify with this category or against it. And I think social media brings us more categories than we had in the past. There’s a lot of micro labels that were trending on Tumblr, like different genders and different sexual orientations, and even fashion-wise, like different aesthetic micro labels. You could be Cottagecore, Goblincore, Clean Girl Coquette. All of these are like now labels that exist that didn’t exist as much before. Again, they were sort of on Tumblr. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But the algorithm really popularized them and now they’re more in the popular consciousness than in the past. And now when I’m defining my fashion identity, I could have just liked earth tones in the pass, but now I need to figure out whether I’m goblincore or whatever. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s all marketing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But now I’m like putting myself in maybe a narrower box than I was before. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Last year, the Seattle Museum of Pop Culture got a lot of heat for how it presented its Nirvana exhibit. It included a placard about the 27 Club, a group of artists who have all passed away at 27. Nirvana’s front man, Kurt Cobain, died by suicide at that age, but the exhibit said he “Unalived himself at 27.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So how did this algospeak phrase end up in a real life physical museum? Let’s get into algospeak moving offline after this break. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How did the term unalive end up in a real museum? \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s a new tab. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">When algospeak goes mainstream. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So more and more, we’re seeing algospeak break out of online spaces and ooze into real life conversations. For your book, you interviewed teachers about kids using the word unalive unironically. How does this happen? Do those kids know why they’re saying the word, unalive? Do they know that they’re using algospeak? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think a very important thing to think about is context collapse, the idea that we don’t know where some words are coming from. They’re often reinterpreted in a new way once you see it coming from a new context or when you’re not the perceived audience, like the fact that unalive is being used offline. Some kids didn’t know that was a word for internet censorship at all. They hear it from their friends. They hear from creators, but at the same time, they didn’t that the creators are using it for this purpose. There’s a lot of reasons why we lose context, and when we lose context, that’s how we forget the etymology. When we forget the etymology, that’s how words change meaning. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, we always see posts of people saying like, “Oh, this white creator is faking a Blaccent.” And those, they may insist that they’re not, they’re just using internet lingo. How does context collapse play in that kind of scenario? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, Blaccent is different. That’s sort of actual intonations and speech patterns. And it’s very hard to accidentally start using that particularly. But individual words, perhaps, you really might not know unless you’re super tapped into etymology, like that slay, serve, queen, cooked, ate, bet, you know, cap. All of this comes from Black slang. And then you replicate it. And the words were originally created as a sort of identity forming mechanism, again, because language is a tool for identity building. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And it was created in this community that needed a way to build identity away from the straight white norms of the English language. A lot of this was from the ballroom slang in New York City in the 1980s. And then it sort of gets repurposed and it loses that power in the original community. Now they have a need to come up with more words and now we’re back in treadmill territory. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That euphemism treadmill applies to pretty much every marginalized group online. Like how instead of saying “autistic,” people might use “acoustic” or “neuro-spicy” or “touch of the ’tism.” Autistic creators use these phrases in conversations with other autistic creators to evade filters and as a tongue-in-cheek way to identify others who have had similar experiences. But those terms spread and broke into the mainstream. And with that, context collapse. When in-group language goes mainstream, outsiders might use it pejoratively against the community that created those words. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, I don’t think, I think at this point, we’ve stopped saying that or I was never saying that I think it was always kind of strange. It was coined inside the autistic community and the mental health spaces as a way to kind of just poke fun at autism, but for themselves. And then let’s say like, I dunno, like, this is also a natural human phenomenon. Let’s say you are a relative of someone who’s autistic. Is it okay to use that word? Maybe, maybe. You’re, you know, you’re close to the culture. You really do care about it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But now, now you’re a relative using it and you might say it and someone else might hear from you and think it’s fine to say it themselves. And then that’s how context collapse occurs. With acoustic, it’s one of those funny TikTok words as well that made it more spreadable as a meme. That made it easier to turn negative because it’s just a joke, right? Jokes can like tread into edgy territory. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, when I was reading your book, you bring up a similar thought with, you know, the words “fruity” and “zesty.” And it really reminded me of, I don’t know if you remember in the 2000s, there was this Hilary Duff PSA where it’s like, “You can’t say that top is gay.” And you know and she’s like, “Why are you using gay as an insult?” And yet on TikTok, I always see people saying like, “Wow, looking fruity today.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, yeah. Well, and often I don’t think that’s that negative, but it can be in like a different context. Right. Yeah, like a bully calling someone like fruity while shoving them into a locker is a different context, and now it’s entirely the context with how that word is perceived. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So thanks to the internet, language is undeniably changing. We’re seeing the development of the influencer accent intertwined with the way that American Sign Language is changing. Aside from self-censorship. How else have you seen language change? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, the sign language example is really interesting. I’d like to elaborate on that real quick. Yeah, please go. The fact that people are signing in a tighter box because that’s what the movements that fit on the phone screen are, the fact that like the word for dog used to be like patting your hip and now it’s like higher up because you couldn’t see that on a phone screen as well, or like there’s more one-handed signing than in the past. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All that is kind of like where sign language is going. And that’s again, we can literally see the constraints of the phone molding sign language. And yet, why wouldn’t it be happening with other versions of language as well? The influencer accent, right? These different intonations we have for speaking online simply because they’re more compelling ways to talk for that medium. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Can you give an example of the influencer accent? Do a, like, do your impression. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">There’s the standard lifestyle influencer like the hey guys welcome to NPR like that kind of kind of rising tone that keeps you paying attention. It’s there’s nothing worse than dead air on the internet and it sort of like fills space and also keeps you kind of the uptalk makes you want to know what’s coming next. I use a different kind of accent I use the educational influencer accent. So I’ll stress more words to keep you watching my video talk faster all that kind of yeah? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, how are you seeing language change and be optimized and algospeaked almost. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right, it’s all algorithmic optimization. In the past, you’d have stuff like search engine optimization where people would stuff metadata in a certain way to make their pages rank higher on Google. When I say that all words are metadata though, I can’t emphasize that strongly enough. Because if SEO was a thing people did in the past to get their pages to rank higher, algorithmic optimizations is what we’re doing now. And that means every single word plays a part. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The fact that this handful of tech platforms have such immense influence on the way that we communicate does genuinely freak me out, because clearly this is bigger than internet slang. If our speech patterns are getting molded into what’s best for the algorithm, then what else are we unconsciously optimizing? The way we think? The way process feelings? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I have one last tab to open. Chat, are we cook? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I always see discourse about language and how the internet is ruining language, how algorithms are ruining language, we’re losing our roots. You know, a lot of that kind of, you know, hand-wringing. In your professional opinion, as a linguist with a degree, are we cooked? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Well, that’s the last chapter title. I want to first separate language from culture, which maybe is not a correct distinction, but let’s look at language first. There’s nothing ever wrong with one word more than another word, right? There’s no such thing as brain rot for individual words. Words are just like there, you know, and then we can use them for good or bad. That’s where culture comes in. Yeah, neurologically speaking, no word is rotting your brain. So as a linguist, I really want to emphasize that, put that aside. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Language is, however, a proxy for culture. You can see how culture’s shifting with language and culture to me is an individual subjective thing. It seems pretty bad to me that our language is evolving under the auspices of these greedy monetizing platforms that are trying to commodify our attention. And maybe, hey, we can look at literally how language is rerouting to change that maybe be more aware of that and maybe spend less time on these platforms or give less power to what they’re saying. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So the fact that these platforms are incentivizing grabbing user attention, creators now, they’re just trying to make a living, they are trying to get attention themselves, they replicate these sort of platform structures. And you can see how also changes in weighting affect the distribution of content and messaging. Instagram, after Trump got elected, went super racist. I was on Reels before and after, and all of a sudden there’s this really racist AI slop down my feet and how did that happen? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s like on another level. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, they change something in the inputs, they change something about what they’re filtering out. And now we’re getting all different content and maybe shifting the overton window of acceptable ideas in a different direction. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So going back to your own content, you’re covering very complex, nuanced topics and adapting them to be approachable for the average non-linguist scroller. What have you learned about making this kind of information compelling for anyone? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mentioned edutainment. It’s very important that you package things inside other things that are more compelling, find mediums that work better for certain messages. So it works for me because I am actually academically analyzing where slang words come from. But at the same time, it’s just funny that I’m talking about skibidi toilet and people will-\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Put Harvard degree to work. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s funny because people, you know, recognize that it’s funny, but it’s serious at the same time. So by packaging something serious inside something funny, I can maybe have an impact here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What is the algospeak practice you maybe unconsciously used and caught yourself, you know, using in your own content? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve thought about this a lot with the influencer accent because part of it is conscious, part of it, is, “Alright, I’m going to try to stress certain words right now.” At the same time, an accent is not something you can consciously maintain all the time. It’s like a subconscious thing that you uphold simply because it’s like building a habit or routine. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Once you do it enough, you sort of slip into it naturally. At this point, you know, I’ve sort of trained myself into it by looking at retention rates and seeing what works and thinking about it critically. But at the same time, when I’m actually filming, I’m not thinking about all these things. I just go into a routine and I film my video and I’ve subconsciously done the influencer accent. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You know, it’s funny you mention that. I have caught myself doing the same thing where I, the voice I am using on the show is very different from the voice I use when I have to make social videos for the show. But it’s true. You are being perceived very differently. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The analogy I like for the influencer accent is broadcast TV, like TV broadcasters will use a different tone of speech. “This just in,” you know, “Breaking news,” like they’ll talk differently than they do in real life, and that’s normal because they’re accommodating for that medium. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">You can hear this in the public radio accent too. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Derry Murbles: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Welcome to Thoughts for your Thoughts. I’m Derry Murbles filling in for David Parker. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, that’s a parody of the NPR accent from Parks and Rec, but it sounds familiar, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Derry Murbles: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Join us next week when David Bianculli will be filling in for Richard Chang Jefferson, who will be filing in for me. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Right. Well, this is sort of like audience design again. There’s an expected idea of what to perceive. Audience design is an actual concept in linguistics that you are accommodating your speech for your perceived imaginary audience. And that’s what the TV people do. That’s what influencers do. And that what NPR people are doing. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So there’s an idea about what a cultured NPR accent sounds like, and then you do it. Occasionally I get like too into like talking about something and then people are like, “You’re using your influencer accent.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. All right, last last question for real. What is the big takeaway you want people to walk away with from your book? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Adam Aleksic:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Two big takeaways, one, algorithms are a new medium that are affecting every aspect of how language changes right now. Two, now that you’re aware of these things, now that your more critically informed, hopefully make your own choices about how to use language. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks so much for joining us. I have started to think about the ways that I unconsciously incorporate algospeak into my day-to-day speech. And that, maybe, for the sake of the algorithm, I should be more intentional about using it on the show. When we started developing this podcast, I did play around with the NPR accent. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">From KQED studios and the depths of the internet, it’s time to close all these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that felt weird, but maybe I’ll give the influencer accent a go. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey, tabbers, you’ll never guess what we’re doing now. We’re closing all of these tabs.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Or I’ll try Adam’s educator-creator accent? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey, fun fact! Did you know we’re at the end of the episode, and that means it’s time to close all these tabs? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But you know what? For now, I’ll stick with my own. Let’s close all of these tabs. \u003c/span>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">\u003cbr>\n\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s Director of Podcasts and helps edit the show.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song, by Chris Egusa. Sound design by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsey is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at CloseAllTabs@KQED.org. Follow us on instagram @CloseAllTabsPod Or drop it on Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. And if you’re enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple podcasts or whatever platform you use.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12051056/is-algospeak-coming-for-us",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_22973",
"news_2451",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_23393",
"news_24509",
"news_1089",
"news_1631",
"news_29435",
"news_22585"
],
"featImg": "news_12051062",
"label": "source_news_12051056"
},
"news_12050185": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_12050185",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "12050185",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1753869646000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "save-or-scroll-ice-influencers-data-hygiene-on-grindr-and-labubu-desserts",
"title": "Save or Scroll: ICE + Influencers, Data Hygiene on Grindr, and Labubu Desserts",
"publishDate": 1753869646,
"format": "audio",
"headTitle": "Save or Scroll: ICE + Influencers, Data Hygiene on Grindr, and Labubu Desserts | KQED",
"labelTerm": {},
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In another installment of \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Save or Scroll\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Morgan teams up with internet culture writers Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II to dig into the stories they can’t stop thinking about. From people calling ICE on influencers, to Grindr’s new age verification, to the Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate craze (yes, you heard that correctly), the three of them have plenty to scroll through. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Save or Scroll is our series where we team up with guests for a rapid-fire roundup of internet trends that are filling our feeds right now. At the end of each segment, they’ll decide: is the post just for the group chat, or should we save it for a future episode?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC3013135493\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.daysiatolentino.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Daysia Tolentino\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Yap Year founder and writer at Entertainment Weekly\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/moises-mendez-ii-06073b139/\">Moises Mendez II\u003c/a>, writer at Out Magazine\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://ew.com/5-reasons-love-island-usa-went-completely-off-the-rails-11768285\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">5 reasons ‘Love Island USA’ went completely off the rails this year\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Daysia Tolentino, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Entertainment Weekly \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.wired.com/story/the-obsessive-fans-playing-god-on-love-island-and-living-for-the-crash-outs/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Obsessive Fans Playing God on ‘Love Island’—and Living for the Crash-Outs \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jason Parham, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">WIRED\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.attitude.co.uk/news/grindr-introduces-age-verification-for-uk-based-users-486823/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Grindr introduces age verification for UK-based users\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Aaron Sugg, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Attitude \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/may/26/grindr-accused-of-treating-gay-man-medical-data-like-piece-of-meat\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Grindr accused of treating gay man’s medical data like ‘piece of meat’ | UK news\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Robert Booth, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Guardian \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2025/06/18/g-s1-72939/what-is-labubu-pop-mart-explained\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">‘Labubu’ is a plush toy that is causing a frenzy. Here’s its origin story\u003c/span>\u003c/a> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Juliana Kim, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NPR\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://aftermath.site/relooted-game-africa-museum-visa-nyamakop-interview\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How Relooted, A Game About Reclaiming African Artifacts From Western Museums, Ended Up Being Shown By A White Guy At Summer Game Fest\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Nathan Grayson, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aftermath \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/reddit-snark-ice-adam-mcintyre-1235383542/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Reddit Trolls Are Weaponizing Government Agencies Against Creators\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Fortesa Latifi, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rolling Stone \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\n\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey guys, welcome to Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Except today, we aren’t opening any tabs. Instead, we’re doing another Save or Scroll. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Occasionally, while scrolling online, I come across a truly wild post, but it might not make sense to spend an entire episode talking about it. Maybe I do a little digging, and it turns out the lore behind it just isn’t compelling enough to justify a deep dive. Sometimes there’s no lore at all. Not everything online is a multi-tab journey. It can just be juicy gossip for the group chat. But that doesn’t mean that these topics aren’t worth yapping about. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So joining us today to do just that are some of my favorite group chat regulars, Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II. Hey, guys. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hello. It’s good to see you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hi, thank you so much for having us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for being here. Okay, so you’re both very accomplished internet culture journalists. Do you want to introduce yourselves? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hi, my name is Moises Mendez, the second, as we are all aware now. I recently was a culture reporter at Time Magazine, and now I am a staff writer at Out Magazine, so I cover everything from movies, television, to the internet, and beyond. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yay, Daysia, what about you? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, so I’m currently working at Entertainment Weekly covering podcasts and celebrity stuff, but I historically cover internet culture and I cover the internet for my own newsletter, Yap Year. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We love Yap Year here. So we are here to play a game called Save or Scroll. Save as in, when you see a post on TikTok or Instagram or X and you bookmark it because you know you’re going to want to talk about it later. And scroll as in, you keep scrolling and it disappears into the digital ether. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, we’ve each brought a handful of posts that we cannot stop thinking about. And we’re going take turns to see if they’re just for the group chat. Or if they’re actually worth a deep dive on the show. If we decide to scroll, it means we’ve talked about it, we’re moving on. If we decided to save, it means that we may hold onto the idea for a future episode. All right, any questions? How are you feeling? Are you ready? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m so ready. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I love a game, so I’m ready. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All right, let’s jump in. Daysia, what did you bring us? Tell us about the Love Island drama. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lord, I don’t know if you guys watched this most recent season of Love Island, but it was basically a mess from the start.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Love Island: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Welcome to Love Island! Warning, the following program contains love, lust, and the most attractive unemployed people you’ve ever seen. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Love Island is a reality TV show that puts a bunch of singles together into a Fiji villa. And basically, everybody couples up over the course of six weeks. And people are obsessed with it because last season was the first USA version of Love Island, which originally started in the UK, to really take off. And then the issues started arising with Yulyssa Escobar getting kicked off early on the second episode of the show, due to resurfaced posts in which she says the N-word. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another contestant, Cierra Ortega, was also asked to exit the show because of an old Instagram story that she had posted in January 2024 saying the anti-Asian C-slur. And people were upset that action wasn’t taken sooner because apparently it had resurfaced earlier in the season. But essentially, Cierra came out of the villa. She made an apology. Sorry, not apology. She explicitly said it was not an apology video. It was an accountability video. And she agrees that she had to face the consequences and experience a punishment for her behavior. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She was getting death threats, rape threats, and ICE threats. Um, people have called ICE on her family. You know, Cierra is a Latina woman. And she was kind of talking about while showing these screenshots, “Is this still accountability? Is it accountability that you people are still looking for?” But my question is: what is enough? What is the line of punishment when somebody does something wrong? And obviously, there’s no excuse for using racial slurs, and people do need to be held accountable for the things that they say. But that doesn’t justify the messages that she got as a result of this controversy, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, for me at least, you know, being an Asian woman who has been literally called the slur, I do have to wonder how many of the people unleashing this vitriol are actual like allies to Asians, or it’s just easy engagement, you know? I’m like, a lot of times I’m kind of skeptical. I’m like, do you actually care about, you know, the people who were hurt by the use of this slur? Or is it just an outlet? You know what I mean? Moises, what do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I have only two brain cells left, so one of them is dedicated to internet, the other is dedicated to pop culture, but Love Island doesn’t fit in that. So I don’t watch Love Island. But I think that when it comes to this culture of like looking for accountability from public figures online, what is the line? Like where, like if the person is apologizing for the thing that they are being called out for. What more is next, but we’ve talked about how the accountability culture that exists online right now is more just harassment and bullying than it is people actually repenting for their sins or making any sort of tangible change. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think obviously with the calling of ICE on Cierra’s family, that to me is almost fighting racism with racism. And at that point, accountability is not the goal. And that’s how we get to a point where this idea of cancel culture or accountability has become so diluted because people would rather have blood than some sort of harm addressed and repaired. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Absolutely. So on this, do we save or do we scroll? Moises, what do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I definitely think that we should save. There’s a lot to talk about, not with just this example, but there’s so many others that we can delve into. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about you, Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I definitely think that the bones of this conversation are worth saving, which is that ultimately, these internet dogpiles happen almost every week with a different person. And it’s one of those topics where we have to figure out a solution about accountability without basically telling people to die. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. Exactly. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sorry, God forbid that’s the solution. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">God forbid we have actual change and growth. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nuance, discussion maybe? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">No, nuance on the internet? Absolutely not. I’m going with save too on this. I think we should save it. I think this is a conversation that’s going to continue happening for as long as the internet exists because no one knows how to be normal online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Unfortunately. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, let’s move on. Moises, tell us about Grindr and the current Grindr drama. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So Grindr is a queer social networking app, but it’s basically used as a queer hookup app or dating app. It’s a way for people to find the people closest to them, specifically queer people, but it is mainly for gay men, there are non-binary people and trans people that also exist on the app. The thing about Grindr, is that for as long as it’s been around since 2009, there has been some mess that’s going on in the background. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I wrote a story for the Atlantic about how minors are circumventing these age restrictions and finding their way onto these apps and having conversations with adults. It’s been a topic of conversation for child safety advocates about having age verification on these apps, and most recently Grinder announced that in the UK it would be implementing an age verification tool. There is a lot of conversations about whether this is actually to keep minors off the app, or another way to police queer bodies. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But there’s pros and cons to this issue. The pro is that maybe it’ll be a way for kids to have a roadblock to finding their way into having conversations with adults, because there has been so many reports about Grindr in the last couple of years of minors being sexually assaulted or killed through police reports that they found. But the con is, do we want Grindr to have our data? And do we these big tech companies handling our personal information? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because in the past, Grindr has not had a really great history of handling our data. Back in 2018, they admitted to sharing users’ HIV status to third-party companies. In 2021, they were fined over $6 million in Norway due to data breaches and sharing data without users’ consents. And then 2024, a gay man who is HIV positive said that the app treated user data like a “piece of meat” after his medical data was misused by the app. There’s a lot of conversations about whether or not this is a good thing. I would like for there to not be such an easy route for children to find their way onto these apps, but then I don’t want Grindr to have my personal data and it just becomes this push and pull and we just don’t know exactly how this is gonna play out until it actually is implemented. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But in the US, they said that they don’t have plans right now to implement age verification in the United States. But they said, “We’re always evaluating the best ways to ensure our app is a safe space for adults to make meaningful connections.” So who’s to say? We just have to wait and see. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My question is, how is Grindr going to conduct these age checks? Are they going to store that information? And then, great, they’re just going to have a registry of queer people? That seems safe and very normal in this current political environment. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, in the UK, Grindr said in their statement to me that, “Grindr will utilize age estimation and ID verification technology from FaceTech, while independently managing all data processing to ensure privacy is protected.” So it seems like there will be a third party involved, but who knows what that third party is gonna do with the personal data that’s being used. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So do we save or scroll on this story? What do you think Moises? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, I’m definitely gonna save. It’s something that I have saved in my back pocket because I’ve followed it for years now and there’s definitely more conversations to be had. I definitely plan to speak with data privacy experts about this issue and what’s the best route forward. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about you, Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I definitely think save. I think age verification is an ongoing issue among not just people in the UK, but in the US, especially with these anti-porn laws. I mean, data privacy is such a huge topic that we kind of fail to address time and time again, especially in America. And so I think this is definitely one of those examples of why we should be paying attention to these measures to protect kids that are also putting our data at risk. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m going with save too. I think this conversation is just going to repeat itself like over and over again until the US has any kind of comprehensive data privacy policy, which, you know, who knows if we’ll ever get that? What a pipe dream. We’ll get back to more saving and more scrolling after the break. Okay, we’re back. Daysia, will you tell us about Labubu, Matcha, Dubai chocolate? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate. I just want to say one thing really quickly, which is that I do not subscribe to the Labubu agenda. I have not fallen for the propaganda. And I say this as a Pop Mart girlie. And for those who are unfamiliar, Pop Mart is a Chinese toy company that creates these designer figurines and toys. And Labubu is just one of the characters that have really blown up from Pop Mart. But like any fad, we got to roll everything into one thing to get as much out of a trend as possible. And so we have seen Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mm-hmm. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the rise! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For those who are uninitiated into the Labubu cult or into the Pop Mart cult, Labubus are these little plush keychains that you can clip onto your bag. It’s a cute little thing. It’s like a little plosh monster toy. I’ve seen people compare them to like beanie babies or Funko Pops or like Jelly Cats and Squishmallows. But it’s a blind box. You don’t know which one you’re going to get. You just keep buying Labubus until you get the one you want. And it like incentivizes you to buy more and more and more because you’re not trying to collect them all. You’re trying to get the one you want. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One hundred percent. So, Dubai chocolate is a trendy kind of candy right now. It is chocolate that is full of pistachios and I think phyllo dough and it has kind of taken over my For You pages and everything, but people have started to mold Dubai chocolate into the shape of a Labubu. Which, you know, Labubu is a fuzzy little monster with crazy pointy teeth. So they have created these chocolate molds in the shape of the monster and you know, added them onto like matcha shakes or matcha drinks, chocolate matcha drinks. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like we have these food trends and you know icon trends, if you will, every few years. Every generation has one and now we have this one. And it’s funny because I think this idea of under-consumption core really rose last year as a way to combat these really fast trends that are just clogging up the landfills. They’re taking money out of your wallets. Like it’s very easy to fall for, you know, the hot TikTok shop item of the moment that pops up on your For You page incessantly. And so I think this is a really interesting example of both the worst impulses and maybe… weirdly the best things about microtrends. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Moises, what do you think of the Labubus? Are you a Labubu hater? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">See, I don’t know if you could tell I was a little quiet because I really don’t like Labubus. I’m trying to just take away that demonic energy out of my space. How long do you have them? How long til you get annoyed of them? They take up space. Like they’re not like family heirlooms that you can pass down to like generations. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How dare you! Say that to the woman with the 24-karat Labubu. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guys, can I confess something?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s my queen I love her. Oh God, don’t tell me you have one.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I bought a Labubu. I was back home, I was in Queens, right? Like homeland of the Labubus. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, for journalism, right, out of curiosity, I dragged my sister to Flushing to Tangram Mall. And I was like, “For this episode, I’m going to go Labubu hunting.” My sister and I went to five locations looking for a Labubu. We went to an anime store: sold out. We went to another store: sold out. We went to the Pop Mart vending machine: gone. I go to the last stop. I’m like, “I’m going to go home if this isn’t it.” So I pull up. My sister and I were like, “Okay, they have Labubus.” I bought one. I got the one I wanted. I was delirious. I was like, “Just give, hand it to me. I’m gonna pick out an outfit.” My sister, and I bought little outfits. They were also overpriced. And I took a picture, went home, it was so adorable. And then I flew back to LA yesterday, like last night. And as I was on the plane, my sister texted me, “You left your child at home,” and just sent me a picture of the Labubu left on my parents’ dining table. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">No, you know what? No \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All that toiling, all that money wasted, and it’s just sitting in its little fake Dodger’s hat on my parents’ dining table. Anyway, that was my Labubu story. My sister and I got home and she was like, “I feel sick from consumerism.” She was like, “I need to like cleanse myself. I need touch grass.”. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s what consumerism will do to you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. That’s the moral of the story here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So do we save or scroll on Labubus? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We are scrolling, girl. In a year from now, when Labubus aren’t as crazy and hyped up, are you going to want those 50 Labubus? Scroll girl. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What are you gonna do with them? Yeah. Scroll. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m I’m scrolling. I already abandoned my my Labubu child.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She can’t even take care of one Labubu, she can’t have more than one. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I can’t. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The courts will let her. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I have a story for you. Are you familiar with the video game, Relooted? It’s not out yet, but I don’t know if you’ve seen drama about this. Okay, so Relooted was one of the showcase games at Summer Game Fest last month. What stands out about it is what it’s about. Basically, it’s not repatriating artifacts that were stolen from African countries and are now being held in Western museums. So it’s a puzzle game, you know, and each level you have to go into these like fictional museums and steal back these real life artifacts. So the museums in the game are fictional, but the artifacts themselves are real. And they’re like symbols of a very violent colonial history. Yeah, I guess what do you guys think of it like so far? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it’s an interesting premise. I mean, the idea of returning artifacts back to the countries they’re from, I think, should be a no-brainer in real life, but is obviously more contentious than that in practice. I also think it could kind of raise awareness in a way about the issue if people started playing it a lot and thinking more about the actual real life situations in which, you know, artifacts are kept in colonial museums essentially. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What do you think Moises? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, I’m definitely a video game person. I talk about playing Fortnite with my friends and I love a story game. And I definitely would eat this game up just because like the premise is really fun and interesting. I think there’s a lot of games that don’t really have a larger societal issue to talk about. I think it’s definitely exciting to consider. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I saw the videos of the guy presenting it, right, at Summer Game Fest. And the guy who presented the game is the game’s creative director, Ben Myers. And he’s a white South African guy. Moises is shaking his head. And so I had the same response, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That felt like really important information. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was like, okay, who is this guy to be the face of a game about repatriation? But it turns out he was the one to present the game because the dev team is from all over Africa, like Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe. The studio itself is based in South Africa. It turns out, he was someone to present a game because the developer who was supposed to be face of it and present, couldn’t get a visa into the United States. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, Ben Myers, the creative director, thinks he got a visa because he has a South African passport, an Australian passport, and a British passport and he’s a white guy. And meanwhile, the developer who was denied, they said that the consulate in South Africa kind of like denied them instantly and that they approved a white visa applicant right after denying theirs. And so the game itself is an inherently like political statement, but the circumstances of the game’s debut have also been now the symbol of this cultural war. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This whole thing opens up a really interesting conversation about many things, right? Which is, first of all, South Africa is still contending with the aftermath of apartheid and to this day, right? And obviously seeing a white man from South Africa present this game, feelings toward that are obviously going to come up. And then you have this added context of, “No, actually, the person who was supposed to actually present the game was denied because of our racist visa system in America.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the layers of ultimately oppression in this are just so complex. I mean, the ultimate message of this game is talking about ownership and returning artifacts to where they are rightfully from and the people who want to share this message can’t even go to, like, conferences in the US or, you know, events to continue to share this message. So it’s just a double, like slap in the face of oppression there. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. Yes. So on this, save or scroll, Moises, what do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Um, I think that this is definitely a save because there definitely might be other instances like this and that are going underreported. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about you, Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m saving. I’m gonna play that game when it comes out. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m saving it, it’s called Relooted. Who knows when it’s coming out? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One day. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One day. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ll order it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yay! Okay, I’m saving. Last story for today, Moises, tell us about what’s happening with Reddit snark pages. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So right now, a Reddit snark page is at the center of a very interesting controversy. These snark pages are dedicated to specific influencers, to gossip about them, make comments about things that they’re doing, and you know, basically just there’s a community of people who like to talk about someone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So there’s this influencer named Adam McIntyre, he’s a drama influencer. So he basically recaps pop culture moments, he talks about other influencers and the dramas that they have going on. So Adam is an Irish influencer who came to the US to do a couple shows. He got an O1 visa, but some of the members on his Reddit snark page circulated the photo that he posted of his visa and said that he was issued an R1 visa, which is for people entering the United States to perform religious work, which is not exactly what he did. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the r/AdamMcIntyre snark page reported him to ICE. So he announced that he was gonna take legal action against the Reddit snark page. And two days later, the snark page was taken down. So it is this really interesting conversation about the way that, not only snark pages, but people who are not fans of certain influencers are trying to deplatform the people that they don’t like, but they’re also trying to put them in harm’s way. Because a lot of what’s going on right now with ICE, especially in Los Angeles and across the country, is a really dangerous moment for immigrants or just people who are visiting here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, this just this whole story is like horrific because I mean we’ve heard about the ways people react to people that they don’t like or disagree with — harassing people, never okay. But sending someone hate mail is one thing and then to call ICE on them as an of violence is just on another level. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It just reminds me again of the Love Island situation. We’ve gotten to a point in internet culture where being a fan of someone or being an anti of someone rather is not enough. Hating on them and talking about them negatively is not enough. I think a lot of people think this is a freaking game and it’s not because people are already being brutalized in ICE detention centers, being held in the most inhumane conditions. And then you wanna subject people to that just because you don’t like them when they’re here legally on a work visa? And whether people understand it or not, what they’re signing up for is enacting harm on these people like Adam. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So for me, this is a save. Moises, what about you? Save or scroll? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Definitely a save, for sure.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">100% a save. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And do we have any closing thoughts on the state of the internet after this wonderful Save or Scroll session? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve been so tired by the internet lately because I don’t understand how people can care this much about that many people who are honestly just random people. Especially with these Love Island people. It’s like, I dunno. That pool boy is a pool boy from Florida. Yeah, I didn’t expect him to have the perfect Instagram history. Like… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, yeah. I mean, my closing thought would be that people just need to be a little bit more normal online. But given that all of these tech billionaires that own these platforms, that allow for there to be some of the worst, most vile humans to share their opinions online, uh, it’s only gonna get worse from here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Will you be going offline, will you be logging off, given everything you said? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s hard when you’re an internet culture reporter to log off. It’s almost like throwing your job away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is. It’s physically impossible. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everybody needs a break, even if it’s a few days. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks so much for joining us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you so much, Morgan! This was so much fun! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you for having us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that’s it for Save or Scroll. We’re keeping tabs on everything we saved, so don’t be surprised if one of these stories shows up as a deep dive on your feed. We’ll be back next week with more Close All tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s Director of Podcasts and helps edit the show.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sound design by Maya Cueva and Brendan Willard. Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsay is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram at “close all tabs pod.” Or drop it on Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. And if you’re enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple podcasts or whatever platform you use.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": "Morgan and guests team up for a rapid-fire roundup of internet trends, including Labubus, Love Island, and more.",
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1753905956,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": true,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 129,
"wordCount": 5593
},
"headData": {
"title": "Save or Scroll: ICE + Influencers, Data Hygiene on Grindr, and Labubu Desserts | KQED",
"description": "In another installment of Save or Scroll, Morgan teams up with internet culture writers Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II to dig into the stories they can’t stop thinking about. From people calling ICE on influencers, to Grindr’s new age verification, to the Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate craze (yes, you heard that correctly), the three of them have plenty to scroll through. Save or Scroll is our series where we team up with guests for a rapid-fire roundup of internet trends that are filling our feeds right now. At the end of each segment, they’ll decide: is the post just for the group chat, or should we save it for a future episode?",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"socialDescription": "In another installment of Save or Scroll, Morgan teams up with internet culture writers Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II to dig into the stories they can’t stop thinking about. From people calling ICE on influencers, to Grindr’s new age verification, to the Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate craze (yes, you heard that correctly), the three of them have plenty to scroll through. Save or Scroll is our series where we team up with guests for a rapid-fire roundup of internet trends that are filling our feeds right now. At the end of each segment, they’ll decide: is the post just for the group chat, or should we save it for a future episode?",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Save or Scroll: ICE + Influencers, Data Hygiene on Grindr, and Labubu Desserts",
"datePublished": "2025-07-30T03:00:46-07:00",
"dateModified": "2025-07-30T13:05:56-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"primaryCategory": {
"termId": 33520,
"slug": "podcast",
"name": "Podcast"
},
"source": "Close All Tabs",
"sourceUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"audioUrl": "https://chrt.fm/track/G6C7C3/traffic.megaphone.fm/KQINC3013135493.mp3?updated=1753834501",
"sticky": false,
"nprStoryId": "kqed-12050185",
"templateType": "standard",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"articleAge": "1",
"path": "/news/12050185/save-or-scroll-ice-influencers-data-hygiene-on-grindr-and-labubu-desserts",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">In another installment of \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Save or Scroll\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Morgan teams up with internet culture writers Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II to dig into the stories they can’t stop thinking about. From people calling ICE on influencers, to Grindr’s new age verification, to the Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate craze (yes, you heard that correctly), the three of them have plenty to scroll through. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Save or Scroll is our series where we team up with guests for a rapid-fire roundup of internet trends that are filling our feeds right now. At the end of each segment, they’ll decide: is the post just for the group chat, or should we save it for a future episode?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!-- iframe plugin v.4.3 wordpress.org/plugins/iframe/ -->\u003cbr>\n\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" frameborder=\"0\" height=\"200\" scrolling=\"no\" src=\"https://playlist.megaphone.fm/?e=KQINC3013135493\" width=\"100%\" class=\"iframe-class\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guests: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.daysiatolentino.com/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Daysia Tolentino\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">, Yap Year founder and writer at Entertainment Weekly\u003c/span>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.linkedin.com/in/moises-mendez-ii-06073b139/\">Moises Mendez II\u003c/a>, writer at Out Magazine\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Further reading/listening: \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://ew.com/5-reasons-love-island-usa-went-completely-off-the-rails-11768285\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">5 reasons ‘Love Island USA’ went completely off the rails this year\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Daysia Tolentino, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Entertainment Weekly \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.wired.com/story/the-obsessive-fans-playing-god-on-love-island-and-living-for-the-crash-outs/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Obsessive Fans Playing God on ‘Love Island’—and Living for the Crash-Outs \u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Jason Parham, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">WIRED\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.attitude.co.uk/news/grindr-introduces-age-verification-for-uk-based-users-486823/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Grindr introduces age verification for UK-based users\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Aaron Sugg, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Attitude \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/article/2024/may/26/grindr-accused-of-treating-gay-man-medical-data-like-piece-of-meat\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Grindr accused of treating gay man’s medical data like ‘piece of meat’ | UK news\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Robert Booth, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The Guardian \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/2025/06/18/g-s1-72939/what-is-labubu-pop-mart-explained\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">‘Labubu’ is a plush toy that is causing a frenzy. Here’s its origin story\u003c/span>\u003c/a> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">— Juliana Kim, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">NPR\u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://aftermath.site/relooted-game-africa-museum-visa-nyamakop-interview\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How Relooted, A Game About Reclaiming African Artifacts From Western Museums, Ended Up Being Shown By A White Guy At Summer Game Fest\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Nathan Grayson, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Aftermath \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"https://www.rollingstone.com/culture/culture-features/reddit-snark-ice-adam-mcintyre-1235383542/\">\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Reddit Trolls Are Weaponizing Government Agencies Against Creators\u003c/span>\u003c/a>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\"> — Fortesa Latifi, \u003c/span>\u003ci>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Rolling Stone \u003c/span>\u003c/i>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Want to give us feedback on the show? Shoot us an email at \u003ca href=\"mailto:CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\">CloseAllTabs@KQED.org\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.instagram.com/closealltabspod/\">Follow us on Instagram\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003ch2>\u003c/h2>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-content post-body\">\u003ch2 id=\"episode-transcript\">Episode Transcript\u003c/h2>\n\u003cp>\u003ci data-stringify-type=\"italic\">This is a computer-generated transcript. While our team has reviewed it, there may be errors.\u003c/i>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hey guys, welcome to Close All Tabs. I’m Morgan Sung, tech journalist and your chronically online friend, here to open as many browser tabs as it takes to help you understand how the digital world affects our real lives. Except today, we aren’t opening any tabs. Instead, we’re doing another Save or Scroll. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Occasionally, while scrolling online, I come across a truly wild post, but it might not make sense to spend an entire episode talking about it. Maybe I do a little digging, and it turns out the lore behind it just isn’t compelling enough to justify a deep dive. Sometimes there’s no lore at all. Not everything online is a multi-tab journey. It can just be juicy gossip for the group chat. But that doesn’t mean that these topics aren’t worth yapping about. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So joining us today to do just that are some of my favorite group chat regulars, Daysia Tolentino and Moises Mendez II. Hey, guys. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hello. It’s good to see you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hi, thank you so much for having us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for being here. Okay, so you’re both very accomplished internet culture journalists. Do you want to introduce yourselves? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Hi, my name is Moises Mendez, the second, as we are all aware now. I recently was a culture reporter at Time Magazine, and now I am a staff writer at Out Magazine, so I cover everything from movies, television, to the internet, and beyond. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yay, Daysia, what about you? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, so I’m currently working at Entertainment Weekly covering podcasts and celebrity stuff, but I historically cover internet culture and I cover the internet for my own newsletter, Yap Year. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We love Yap Year here. So we are here to play a game called Save or Scroll. Save as in, when you see a post on TikTok or Instagram or X and you bookmark it because you know you’re going to want to talk about it later. And scroll as in, you keep scrolling and it disappears into the digital ether. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So, we’ve each brought a handful of posts that we cannot stop thinking about. And we’re going take turns to see if they’re just for the group chat. Or if they’re actually worth a deep dive on the show. If we decide to scroll, it means we’ve talked about it, we’re moving on. If we decided to save, it means that we may hold onto the idea for a future episode. All right, any questions? How are you feeling? Are you ready? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m so ready. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I love a game, so I’m ready. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All right, let’s jump in. Daysia, what did you bring us? Tell us about the Love Island drama. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Lord, I don’t know if you guys watched this most recent season of Love Island, but it was basically a mess from the start.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Love Island: \u003c/b>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Welcome to Love Island! Warning, the following program contains love, lust, and the most attractive unemployed people you’ve ever seen. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Love Island is a reality TV show that puts a bunch of singles together into a Fiji villa. And basically, everybody couples up over the course of six weeks. And people are obsessed with it because last season was the first USA version of Love Island, which originally started in the UK, to really take off. And then the issues started arising with Yulyssa Escobar getting kicked off early on the second episode of the show, due to resurfaced posts in which she says the N-word. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Another contestant, Cierra Ortega, was also asked to exit the show because of an old Instagram story that she had posted in January 2024 saying the anti-Asian C-slur. And people were upset that action wasn’t taken sooner because apparently it had resurfaced earlier in the season. But essentially, Cierra came out of the villa. She made an apology. Sorry, not apology. She explicitly said it was not an apology video. It was an accountability video. And she agrees that she had to face the consequences and experience a punishment for her behavior. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She was getting death threats, rape threats, and ICE threats. Um, people have called ICE on her family. You know, Cierra is a Latina woman. And she was kind of talking about while showing these screenshots, “Is this still accountability? Is it accountability that you people are still looking for?” But my question is: what is enough? What is the line of punishment when somebody does something wrong? And obviously, there’s no excuse for using racial slurs, and people do need to be held accountable for the things that they say. But that doesn’t justify the messages that she got as a result of this controversy, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, for me at least, you know, being an Asian woman who has been literally called the slur, I do have to wonder how many of the people unleashing this vitriol are actual like allies to Asians, or it’s just easy engagement, you know? I’m like, a lot of times I’m kind of skeptical. I’m like, do you actually care about, you know, the people who were hurt by the use of this slur? Or is it just an outlet? You know what I mean? Moises, what do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I have only two brain cells left, so one of them is dedicated to internet, the other is dedicated to pop culture, but Love Island doesn’t fit in that. So I don’t watch Love Island. But I think that when it comes to this culture of like looking for accountability from public figures online, what is the line? Like where, like if the person is apologizing for the thing that they are being called out for. What more is next, but we’ve talked about how the accountability culture that exists online right now is more just harassment and bullying than it is people actually repenting for their sins or making any sort of tangible change. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think obviously with the calling of ICE on Cierra’s family, that to me is almost fighting racism with racism. And at that point, accountability is not the goal. And that’s how we get to a point where this idea of cancel culture or accountability has become so diluted because people would rather have blood than some sort of harm addressed and repaired. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Absolutely. So on this, do we save or do we scroll? Moises, what do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I definitely think that we should save. There’s a lot to talk about, not with just this example, but there’s so many others that we can delve into. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about you, Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I definitely think that the bones of this conversation are worth saving, which is that ultimately, these internet dogpiles happen almost every week with a different person. And it’s one of those topics where we have to figure out a solution about accountability without basically telling people to die. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. Exactly. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sorry, God forbid that’s the solution. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">God forbid we have actual change and growth. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Nuance, discussion maybe? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">No, nuance on the internet? Absolutely not. I’m going with save too on this. I think we should save it. I think this is a conversation that’s going to continue happening for as long as the internet exists because no one knows how to be normal online. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Unfortunately. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay, let’s move on. Moises, tell us about Grindr and the current Grindr drama. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So Grindr is a queer social networking app, but it’s basically used as a queer hookup app or dating app. It’s a way for people to find the people closest to them, specifically queer people, but it is mainly for gay men, there are non-binary people and trans people that also exist on the app. The thing about Grindr, is that for as long as it’s been around since 2009, there has been some mess that’s going on in the background. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I wrote a story for the Atlantic about how minors are circumventing these age restrictions and finding their way onto these apps and having conversations with adults. It’s been a topic of conversation for child safety advocates about having age verification on these apps, and most recently Grinder announced that in the UK it would be implementing an age verification tool. There is a lot of conversations about whether this is actually to keep minors off the app, or another way to police queer bodies. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But there’s pros and cons to this issue. The pro is that maybe it’ll be a way for kids to have a roadblock to finding their way into having conversations with adults, because there has been so many reports about Grindr in the last couple of years of minors being sexually assaulted or killed through police reports that they found. But the con is, do we want Grindr to have our data? And do we these big tech companies handling our personal information? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Because in the past, Grindr has not had a really great history of handling our data. Back in 2018, they admitted to sharing users’ HIV status to third-party companies. In 2021, they were fined over $6 million in Norway due to data breaches and sharing data without users’ consents. And then 2024, a gay man who is HIV positive said that the app treated user data like a “piece of meat” after his medical data was misused by the app. There’s a lot of conversations about whether or not this is a good thing. I would like for there to not be such an easy route for children to find their way onto these apps, but then I don’t want Grindr to have my personal data and it just becomes this push and pull and we just don’t know exactly how this is gonna play out until it actually is implemented. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">But in the US, they said that they don’t have plans right now to implement age verification in the United States. But they said, “We’re always evaluating the best ways to ensure our app is a safe space for adults to make meaningful connections.” So who’s to say? We just have to wait and see. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">My question is, how is Grindr going to conduct these age checks? Are they going to store that information? And then, great, they’re just going to have a registry of queer people? That seems safe and very normal in this current political environment. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, in the UK, Grindr said in their statement to me that, “Grindr will utilize age estimation and ID verification technology from FaceTech, while independently managing all data processing to ensure privacy is protected.” So it seems like there will be a third party involved, but who knows what that third party is gonna do with the personal data that’s being used. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So do we save or scroll on this story? What do you think Moises? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, I’m definitely gonna save. It’s something that I have saved in my back pocket because I’ve followed it for years now and there’s definitely more conversations to be had. I definitely plan to speak with data privacy experts about this issue and what’s the best route forward. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about you, Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I definitely think save. I think age verification is an ongoing issue among not just people in the UK, but in the US, especially with these anti-porn laws. I mean, data privacy is such a huge topic that we kind of fail to address time and time again, especially in America. And so I think this is definitely one of those examples of why we should be paying attention to these measures to protect kids that are also putting our data at risk. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m going with save too. I think this conversation is just going to repeat itself like over and over again until the US has any kind of comprehensive data privacy policy, which, you know, who knows if we’ll ever get that? What a pipe dream. We’ll get back to more saving and more scrolling after the break. Okay, we’re back. Daysia, will you tell us about Labubu, Matcha, Dubai chocolate? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate. I just want to say one thing really quickly, which is that I do not subscribe to the Labubu agenda. I have not fallen for the propaganda. And I say this as a Pop Mart girlie. And for those who are unfamiliar, Pop Mart is a Chinese toy company that creates these designer figurines and toys. And Labubu is just one of the characters that have really blown up from Pop Mart. But like any fad, we got to roll everything into one thing to get as much out of a trend as possible. And so we have seen Labubu matcha Dubai chocolate. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Mm-hmm. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">On the rise! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">For those who are uninitiated into the Labubu cult or into the Pop Mart cult, Labubus are these little plush keychains that you can clip onto your bag. It’s a cute little thing. It’s like a little plosh monster toy. I’ve seen people compare them to like beanie babies or Funko Pops or like Jelly Cats and Squishmallows. But it’s a blind box. You don’t know which one you’re going to get. You just keep buying Labubus until you get the one you want. And it like incentivizes you to buy more and more and more because you’re not trying to collect them all. You’re trying to get the one you want. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One hundred percent. So, Dubai chocolate is a trendy kind of candy right now. It is chocolate that is full of pistachios and I think phyllo dough and it has kind of taken over my For You pages and everything, but people have started to mold Dubai chocolate into the shape of a Labubu. Which, you know, Labubu is a fuzzy little monster with crazy pointy teeth. So they have created these chocolate molds in the shape of the monster and you know, added them onto like matcha shakes or matcha drinks, chocolate matcha drinks. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I feel like we have these food trends and you know icon trends, if you will, every few years. Every generation has one and now we have this one. And it’s funny because I think this idea of under-consumption core really rose last year as a way to combat these really fast trends that are just clogging up the landfills. They’re taking money out of your wallets. Like it’s very easy to fall for, you know, the hot TikTok shop item of the moment that pops up on your For You page incessantly. And so I think this is a really interesting example of both the worst impulses and maybe… weirdly the best things about microtrends. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Moises, what do you think of the Labubus? Are you a Labubu hater? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">See, I don’t know if you could tell I was a little quiet because I really don’t like Labubus. I’m trying to just take away that demonic energy out of my space. How long do you have them? How long til you get annoyed of them? They take up space. Like they’re not like family heirlooms that you can pass down to like generations. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">How dare you! Say that to the woman with the 24-karat Labubu. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Guys, can I confess something?\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s my queen I love her. Oh God, don’t tell me you have one.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I bought a Labubu. I was back home, I was in Queens, right? Like homeland of the Labubus. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Okay. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, for journalism, right, out of curiosity, I dragged my sister to Flushing to Tangram Mall. And I was like, “For this episode, I’m going to go Labubu hunting.” My sister and I went to five locations looking for a Labubu. We went to an anime store: sold out. We went to another store: sold out. We went to the Pop Mart vending machine: gone. I go to the last stop. I’m like, “I’m going to go home if this isn’t it.” So I pull up. My sister and I were like, “Okay, they have Labubus.” I bought one. I got the one I wanted. I was delirious. I was like, “Just give, hand it to me. I’m gonna pick out an outfit.” My sister, and I bought little outfits. They were also overpriced. And I took a picture, went home, it was so adorable. And then I flew back to LA yesterday, like last night. And as I was on the plane, my sister texted me, “You left your child at home,” and just sent me a picture of the Labubu left on my parents’ dining table. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">No, you know what? No \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">All that toiling, all that money wasted, and it’s just sitting in its little fake Dodger’s hat on my parents’ dining table. Anyway, that was my Labubu story. My sister and I got home and she was like, “I feel sick from consumerism.” She was like, “I need to like cleanse myself. I need touch grass.”. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That’s what consumerism will do to you. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. That’s the moral of the story here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So do we save or scroll on Labubus? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">We are scrolling, girl. In a year from now, when Labubus aren’t as crazy and hyped up, are you going to want those 50 Labubus? Scroll girl. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What are you gonna do with them? Yeah. Scroll. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m I’m scrolling. I already abandoned my my Labubu child.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">She can’t even take care of one Labubu, she can’t have more than one. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I can’t. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">The courts will let her. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I have a story for you. Are you familiar with the video game, Relooted? It’s not out yet, but I don’t know if you’ve seen drama about this. Okay, so Relooted was one of the showcase games at Summer Game Fest last month. What stands out about it is what it’s about. Basically, it’s not repatriating artifacts that were stolen from African countries and are now being held in Western museums. So it’s a puzzle game, you know, and each level you have to go into these like fictional museums and steal back these real life artifacts. So the museums in the game are fictional, but the artifacts themselves are real. And they’re like symbols of a very violent colonial history. Yeah, I guess what do you guys think of it like so far? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I think it’s an interesting premise. I mean, the idea of returning artifacts back to the countries they’re from, I think, should be a no-brainer in real life, but is obviously more contentious than that in practice. I also think it could kind of raise awareness in a way about the issue if people started playing it a lot and thinking more about the actual real life situations in which, you know, artifacts are kept in colonial museums essentially. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What do you think Moises? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I mean, I’m definitely a video game person. I talk about playing Fortnite with my friends and I love a story game. And I definitely would eat this game up just because like the premise is really fun and interesting. I think there’s a lot of games that don’t really have a larger societal issue to talk about. I think it’s definitely exciting to consider. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So I saw the videos of the guy presenting it, right, at Summer Game Fest. And the guy who presented the game is the game’s creative director, Ben Myers. And he’s a white South African guy. Moises is shaking his head. And so I had the same response, right? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">That felt like really important information. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I was like, okay, who is this guy to be the face of a game about repatriation? But it turns out he was the one to present the game because the dev team is from all over Africa, like Nigeria, Ghana, Ethiopia, Zimbabwe. The studio itself is based in South Africa. It turns out, he was someone to present a game because the developer who was supposed to be face of it and present, couldn’t get a visa into the United States. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And so, Ben Myers, the creative director, thinks he got a visa because he has a South African passport, an Australian passport, and a British passport and he’s a white guy. And meanwhile, the developer who was denied, they said that the consulate in South Africa kind of like denied them instantly and that they approved a white visa applicant right after denying theirs. And so the game itself is an inherently like political statement, but the circumstances of the game’s debut have also been now the symbol of this cultural war. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">This whole thing opens up a really interesting conversation about many things, right? Which is, first of all, South Africa is still contending with the aftermath of apartheid and to this day, right? And obviously seeing a white man from South Africa present this game, feelings toward that are obviously going to come up. And then you have this added context of, “No, actually, the person who was supposed to actually present the game was denied because of our racist visa system in America.” \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And the layers of ultimately oppression in this are just so complex. I mean, the ultimate message of this game is talking about ownership and returning artifacts to where they are rightfully from and the people who want to share this message can’t even go to, like, conferences in the US or, you know, events to continue to share this message. So it’s just a double, like slap in the face of oppression there. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Exactly. Yes. So on this, save or scroll, Moises, what do you think? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Um, I think that this is definitely a save because there definitely might be other instances like this and that are going underreported. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">What about you, Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m saving. I’m gonna play that game when it comes out. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’m saving it, it’s called Relooted. Who knows when it’s coming out? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One day. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">One day. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ll order it. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yay! Okay, I’m saving. Last story for today, Moises, tell us about what’s happening with Reddit snark pages. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So right now, a Reddit snark page is at the center of a very interesting controversy. These snark pages are dedicated to specific influencers, to gossip about them, make comments about things that they’re doing, and you know, basically just there’s a community of people who like to talk about someone. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So there’s this influencer named Adam McIntyre, he’s a drama influencer. So he basically recaps pop culture moments, he talks about other influencers and the dramas that they have going on. So Adam is an Irish influencer who came to the US to do a couple shows. He got an O1 visa, but some of the members on his Reddit snark page circulated the photo that he posted of his visa and said that he was issued an R1 visa, which is for people entering the United States to perform religious work, which is not exactly what he did. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the r/AdamMcIntyre snark page reported him to ICE. So he announced that he was gonna take legal action against the Reddit snark page. And two days later, the snark page was taken down. So it is this really interesting conversation about the way that, not only snark pages, but people who are not fans of certain influencers are trying to deplatform the people that they don’t like, but they’re also trying to put them in harm’s way. Because a lot of what’s going on right now with ICE, especially in Los Angeles and across the country, is a really dangerous moment for immigrants or just people who are visiting here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, I mean, this just this whole story is like horrific because I mean we’ve heard about the ways people react to people that they don’t like or disagree with — harassing people, never okay. But sending someone hate mail is one thing and then to call ICE on them as an of violence is just on another level. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It just reminds me again of the Love Island situation. We’ve gotten to a point in internet culture where being a fan of someone or being an anti of someone rather is not enough. Hating on them and talking about them negatively is not enough. I think a lot of people think this is a freaking game and it’s not because people are already being brutalized in ICE detention centers, being held in the most inhumane conditions. And then you wanna subject people to that just because you don’t like them when they’re here legally on a work visa? And whether people understand it or not, what they’re signing up for is enacting harm on these people like Adam. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">So for me, this is a save. Moises, what about you? Save or scroll? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Definitely a save, for sure.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Daysia? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">100% a save. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And do we have any closing thoughts on the state of the internet after this wonderful Save or Scroll session? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">I’ve been so tired by the internet lately because I don’t understand how people can care this much about that many people who are honestly just random people. Especially with these Love Island people. It’s like, I dunno. That pool boy is a pool boy from Florida. Yeah, I didn’t expect him to have the perfect Instagram history. Like… \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Yeah, yeah. I mean, my closing thought would be that people just need to be a little bit more normal online. But given that all of these tech billionaires that own these platforms, that allow for there to be some of the worst, most vile humans to share their opinions online, uh, it’s only gonna get worse from here. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Will you be going offline, will you be logging off, given everything you said? \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It’s hard when you’re an internet culture reporter to log off. It’s almost like throwing your job away. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">It is. It’s physically impossible. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Everybody needs a break, even if it’s a few days. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks so much for joining us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Moises Mendez II:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you so much, Morgan! This was so much fun! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Daysia Tolentino:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thank you for having us. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">And that’s it for Save or Scroll. We’re keeping tabs on everything we saved, so don’t be surprised if one of these stories shows up as a deep dive on your feed. We’ll be back next week with more Close All tabs. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cb>Morgan Sung:\u003c/b> \u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Close All Tabs is a production of KQED Studios, and is reported and hosted by me, Morgan Sung. Our producer is Maya Cueva. Chris Egusa is our Senior Editor. Jen Chien is KQED’s Director of Podcasts and helps edit the show.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Original music, including our theme song, by Chris Egusa. Additional music by APM. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Sound design by Maya Cueva and Brendan Willard. Mixing and mastering by Brendan Willard.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Audience engagement support from Maha Sanad. Katie Sprenger is our Podcast Operations Manager and Ethan Toven-Lindsay is our Editor in Chief.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Support for this program comes from Birong Hu and supporters of the KQED Studios Fund. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Some members of the KQED podcast team are represented by The Screen Actors Guild, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists. San Francisco Northern California Local.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Keyboard sounds were recorded on my purple and pink Dustsilver K-84 wired mechanical keyboard with Gateron Red switches. \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">If you have feedback, or a topic you think we should cover, hit us up at CloseAllTabs@kqed.org. Follow us on instagram at “close all tabs pod.” Or drop it on Discord — we’re in the Close All Tabs channel at discord.gg/KQED. And if you’re enjoying the show, give us a rating on Apple podcasts or whatever platform you use.\u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cspan style=\"font-weight: 400\">Thanks for listening! \u003c/span>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>"
}
],
"link": "/news/12050185/save-or-scroll-ice-influencers-data-hygiene-on-grindr-and-labubu-desserts",
"authors": [
"11944",
"11943",
"11869"
],
"programs": [
"news_35082"
],
"categories": [
"news_33520"
],
"tags": [
"news_34645",
"news_35092",
"news_21027",
"news_35692",
"news_3137",
"news_34646",
"news_1089",
"news_1631"
],
"featImg": "news_12050194",
"label": "source_news_12050185"
}
},
"podcastsReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"podcasts": {}
},
"radioProgramsReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"radioPrograms": {}
},
"radioSearchSegmentsReducer": {},
"programsReducer": {
"all-things-considered": {
"id": "all-things-considered",
"title": "All Things Considered",
"info": "Every weekday, \u003cem>All Things Considered\u003c/em> hosts Robert Siegel, Audie Cornish, Ari Shapiro, and Kelly McEvers present the program's trademark mix of news, interviews, commentaries, reviews, and offbeat features. Michel Martin hosts on the weekends.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 1pm-2pm, 4:30pm-6:30pm\u003cbr />SAT-SUN 5pm-6pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/All-Things-Considered-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/all-things-considered/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/all-things-considered"
},
"american-suburb-podcast": {
"id": "american-suburb-podcast",
"title": "American Suburb: The Podcast",
"tagline": "The flip side of gentrification, told through one town",
"info": "Gentrification is changing cities across America, forcing people from neighborhoods they have long called home. Call them the displaced. Now those priced out of the Bay Area are looking for a better life in an unlikely place. American Suburb follows this migration to one California town along the Delta, 45 miles from San Francisco. But is this once sleepy suburb ready for them?",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/American-Suburb-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/news/series/american-suburb-podcast",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 19
},
"link": "/news/series/american-suburb-podcast/",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/RBrW",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?mt=2&id=1287748328",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/American-Suburb-p1086805/",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/series/american-suburb-podcast/feed/podcast",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkMzMDExODgxNjA5"
}
},
"baycurious": {
"id": "baycurious",
"title": "Bay Curious",
"tagline": "Exploring the Bay Area, one question at a time",
"info": "KQED’s new podcast, Bay Curious, gets to the bottom of the mysteries — both profound and peculiar — that give the Bay Area its unique identity. And we’ll do it with your help! You ask the questions. You decide what Bay Curious investigates. And you join us on the journey to find the answers.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Bay-Curious-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Bay Curious",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/news/series/baycurious",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 3
},
"link": "/podcasts/baycurious",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bay-curious/id1172473406",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/500557090/bay-curious",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/category/bay-curious-podcast/feed/podcast",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/9a90d476-aa04-455d-9a4c-0871ed6216d4/bay-curious",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/bay-curious",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/6O76IdmhixfijmhTZLIJ8k"
}
},
"bbc-world-service": {
"id": "bbc-world-service",
"title": "BBC World Service",
"info": "The day's top stories from BBC News compiled twice daily in the week, once at weekends.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 9pm-10pm, TUE-FRI 1am-2am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/BBC-World-Service-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_world_service",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "BBC World Service"
},
"link": "/radio/program/bbc-world-service",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/global-news-podcast/id135067274?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/BBC-World-Service-p455581/",
"rss": "https://podcasts.files.bbci.co.uk/p02nq0gn.rss"
}
},
"californiareport": {
"id": "californiareport",
"title": "The California Report",
"tagline": "California, day by day",
"info": "KQED’s statewide radio news program providing daily coverage of issues, trends and public policy decisions.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-California-Report-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The California Report",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/californiareport",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 8
},
"link": "/californiareport",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/kqeds-the-california-report/id79681292",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/26099305-72af-4542-9dde-ac1807fe36d5/kqed-s-the-california-report",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432285393/the-california-report",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqedfm-kqeds-the-california-report-podcast-8838",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/tcram/feed/podcast"
}
},
"californiareportmagazine": {
"id": "californiareportmagazine",
"title": "The California Report Magazine",
"tagline": "Your state, your stories",
"info": "Every week, The California Report Magazine takes you on a road trip for the ears: to visit the places and meet the people who make California unique. The in-depth storytelling podcast from the California Report.",
"airtime": "FRI 4:30pm-5pm, 6:30pm-7pm, 11pm-11:30pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-California-Report-Magazine-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The California Report Magazine",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/californiareportmagazine",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 10
},
"link": "/californiareportmagazine",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-california-report-magazine/id1314750545",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM3NjkwNjk1OTAz",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/564733126/the-california-report-magazine",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-california-report-magazine",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/tcrmag/feed/podcast"
}
},
"city-arts": {
"id": "city-arts",
"title": "City Arts & Lectures",
"info": "A one-hour radio program to hear celebrated writers, artists and thinkers address contemporary ideas and values, often discussing the creative process. Please note: tapes or transcripts are not available",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/cityartsandlecture-300x300.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.cityarts.net/",
"airtime": "SUN 1pm-2pm, TUE 10pm, WED 1am",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "City Arts & Lectures"
},
"link": "https://www.cityarts.net",
"subscribe": {
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/City-Arts-and-Lectures-p692/",
"rss": "https://www.cityarts.net/feed/"
}
},
"closealltabs": {
"id": "closealltabs",
"title": "Close All Tabs",
"tagline": "Your irreverent guide to the trends redefining our world",
"info": "Close All Tabs breaks down how digital culture shapes our world through thoughtful insights and irreverent humor.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CAT_2_Tile-scaled.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Close All Tabs",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/closealltabs",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 1
},
"link": "/podcasts/closealltabs",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/close-all-tabs/id214663465",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC6993880386",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/92d9d4ac-67a3-4eed-b10a-fb45d45b1ef2/close-all-tabs",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/6LAJFHnGK1pYXYzv6SIol6?si=deb0cae19813417c"
}
},
"code-switch-life-kit": {
"id": "code-switch-life-kit",
"title": "Code Switch / Life Kit",
"info": "\u003cem>Code Switch\u003c/em>, which listeners will hear in the first part of the hour, has fearless and much-needed conversations about race. Hosted by journalists of color, the show tackles the subject of race head-on, exploring how it impacts every part of society — from politics and pop culture to history, sports and more.\u003cbr />\u003cbr />\u003cem>Life Kit\u003c/em>, which will be in the second part of the hour, guides you through spaces and feelings no one prepares you for — from finances to mental health, from workplace microaggressions to imposter syndrome, from relationships to parenting. The show features experts with real world experience and shares their knowledge. Because everyone needs a little help being human.\u003cbr />\u003cbr />\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510312/codeswitch\">\u003cem>Code Switch\u003c/em> offical site and podcast\u003c/a>\u003cbr />\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/lifekit\">\u003cem>Life Kit\u003c/em> offical site and podcast\u003c/a>\u003cbr />",
"airtime": "SUN 9pm-10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Code-Switch-Life-Kit-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/code-switch-life-kit",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/1112190608?mt=2&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnByLm9yZy9yc3MvcG9kY2FzdC5waHA_aWQ9NTEwMzEy",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3bExJ9JQpkwNhoHvaIIuyV",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510312/podcast.xml"
}
},
"commonwealth-club": {
"id": "commonwealth-club",
"title": "Commonwealth Club of California Podcast",
"info": "The Commonwealth Club of California is the nation's oldest and largest public affairs forum. As a non-partisan forum, The Club brings to the public airwaves diverse viewpoints on important topics. The Club's weekly radio broadcast - the oldest in the U.S., dating back to 1924 - is carried across the nation on public radio stations and is now podcasting. Our website archive features audio of our recent programs, as well as selected speeches from our long and distinguished history. This podcast feed is usually updated twice a week and is always un-edited.",
"airtime": "THU 10pm, FRI 1am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Commonwealth-Club-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.commonwealthclub.org/podcasts",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "Commonwealth Club of California"
},
"link": "/radio/program/commonwealth-club",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/commonwealth-club-of-california-podcast/id976334034?mt=2",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21tb253ZWFsdGhjbHViLm9yZy9hdWRpby9wb2RjYXN0L3dlZWtseS54bWw",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Commonwealth-Club-of-California-p1060/"
}
},
"forum": {
"id": "forum",
"title": "Forum",
"tagline": "The conversation starts here",
"info": "KQED’s live call-in program discussing local, state, national and international issues, as well as in-depth interviews.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 9am-11am, 10pm-11pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Forum-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Forum with Mina Kim and Alexis Madrigal",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/forum",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 9
},
"link": "/forum",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/kqeds-forum/id73329719",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM5NTU3MzgxNjMz",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432307980/forum",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqedfm-kqeds-forum-podcast",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC9557381633"
}
},
"freakonomics-radio": {
"id": "freakonomics-radio",
"title": "Freakonomics Radio",
"info": "Freakonomics Radio is a one-hour award-winning podcast and public-radio project hosted by Stephen Dubner, with co-author Steve Levitt as a regular guest. It is produced in partnership with WNYC.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/05/freakonomicsRadio.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://freakonomics.com/",
"airtime": "SUN 1am-2am, SAT 3pm-4pm",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/freakonomics-radio",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/4s8b",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/freakonomics-radio/id354668519",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/WNYC-Podcasts/Freakonomics-Radio-p272293/",
"rss": "https://feeds.feedburner.com/freakonomicsradio"
}
},
"fresh-air": {
"id": "fresh-air",
"title": "Fresh Air",
"info": "Hosted by Terry Gross, \u003cem>Fresh Air from WHYY\u003c/em> is the Peabody Award-winning weekday magazine of contemporary arts and issues. One of public radio's most popular programs, Fresh Air features intimate conversations with today's biggest luminaries.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 7pm-8pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Fresh-Air-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/fresh-air",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/4s8b",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=214089682&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Fresh-Air-p17/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/381444908/podcast.xml"
}
},
"here-and-now": {
"id": "here-and-now",
"title": "Here & Now",
"info": "A live production of NPR and WBUR Boston, in collaboration with stations across the country, Here & Now reflects the fluid world of news as it's happening in the middle of the day, with timely, in-depth news, interviews and conversation. Hosted by Robin Young, Jeremy Hobson and Tonya Mosley.",
"airtime": "MON-THU 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Here-And-Now-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/here-and-now",
"subsdcribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?mt=2&id=426698661",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Here--Now-p211/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510051/podcast.xml"
}
},
"hidden-brain": {
"id": "hidden-brain",
"title": "Hidden Brain",
"info": "Shankar Vedantam uses science and storytelling to reveal the unconscious patterns that drive human behavior, shape our choices and direct our relationships.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/hiddenbrain.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/series/423302056/hidden-brain",
"airtime": "SUN 7pm-8pm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "NPR"
},
"link": "/radio/program/hidden-brain",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/hidden-brain/id1028908750?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Science-Podcasts/Hidden-Brain-p787503/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510308/podcast.xml"
}
},
"how-i-built-this": {
"id": "how-i-built-this",
"title": "How I Built This with Guy Raz",
"info": "Guy Raz dives into the stories behind some of the world's best known companies. How I Built This weaves a narrative journey about innovators, entrepreneurs and idealists—and the movements they built.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/05/howIBuiltThis.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510313/how-i-built-this",
"airtime": "SUN 7:30pm-8pm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/how-i-built-this",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/3zxy",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/how-i-built-this-with-guy-raz/id1150510297?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Arts--Culture-Podcasts/How-I-Built-This-p910896/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510313/podcast.xml"
}
},
"hyphenacion": {
"id": "hyphenacion",
"title": "Hyphenación",
"tagline": "Where conversation and cultura meet",
"info": "What kind of no sabo word is Hyphenación? For us, it’s about living within a hyphenation. Like being a third-gen Mexican-American from the Texas border now living that Bay Area Chicano life. Like Xorje! Each week we bring together a couple of hyphenated Latinos to talk all about personal life choices: family, careers, relationships, belonging … everything is on the table. ",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Hyphenacion_FinalAssets_PodcastTile.png",
"imageAlt": "KQED Hyphenación",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/hyphenacion",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 15
},
"link": "/podcasts/hyphenacion",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hyphenaci%C3%B3n/id1191591838",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/2p3Fifq96nw9BPcmFdIq0o?si=39209f7b25774f38",
"youtube": "https://www.youtube.com/c/kqedarts",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/6c3dd23c-93fb-4aab-97ba-1725fa6315f1/hyphenaci%C3%B3n",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC2275451163"
}
},
"jerrybrown": {
"id": "jerrybrown",
"title": "The Political Mind of Jerry Brown",
"tagline": "Lessons from a lifetime in politics",
"info": "The Political Mind of Jerry Brown brings listeners the wisdom of the former Governor, Mayor, and presidential candidate. Scott Shafer interviewed Brown for more than 40 hours, covering the former governor's life and half-century in the political game – and Brown has some lessons he'd like to share. ",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Political-Mind-of-Jerry-Brown-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Political Mind of Jerry Brown",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/jerrybrown",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 18
},
"link": "/podcasts/jerrybrown",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/790253322/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1492194549",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/series/jerrybrown/feed/podcast/",
"tuneIn": "http://tun.in/pjGcK",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/54C1dmuyFyKMFttY6X2j6r?si=K8SgRCoISNK6ZbjpXrX5-w",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/44420f75-3b0e-4301-ab3b-16da6b09e543/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown"
}
},
"latino-usa": {
"id": "latino-usa",
"title": "Latino USA",
"airtime": "MON 1am-2am, SUN 6pm-7pm",
"info": "Latino USA, the radio journal of news and culture, is the only national, English-language radio program produced from a Latino perspective.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/latinoUsa.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://latinousa.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/latino-usa",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/xtTd",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=79681317&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Latino-USA-p621/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510016/podcast.xml"
}
},
"marketplace": {
"id": "marketplace",
"title": "Marketplace",
"info": "Our flagship program, helmed by Kai Ryssdal, examines what the day in money delivered, through stories, conversations, newsworthy numbers and more. Updated Monday through Friday at about 3:30 p.m. PT.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 4pm-4:30pm, MON-WED 6:30pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Marketplace-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.marketplace.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "American Public Media"
},
"link": "/radio/program/marketplace",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=201853034&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/APM-Marketplace-p88/",
"rss": "https://feeds.publicradio.org/public_feeds/marketplace-pm/rss/rss"
}
},
"masters-of-scale": {
"id": "masters-of-scale",
"title": "Masters of Scale",
"info": "Masters of Scale is an original podcast in which LinkedIn co-founder and Greylock Partner Reid Hoffman sets out to describe and prove theories that explain how great entrepreneurs take their companies from zero to a gazillion in ingenious fashion.",
"airtime": "Every other Wednesday June 12 through October 16 at 8pm (repeats Thursdays at 2am)",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Masters-of-Scale-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://mastersofscale.com/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "WaitWhat"
},
"link": "/radio/program/masters-of-scale",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "http://mastersofscale.app.link/",
"rss": "https://rss.art19.com/masters-of-scale"
}
},
"mindshift": {
"id": "mindshift",
"title": "MindShift",
"tagline": "A podcast about the future of learning and how we raise our kids",
"info": "The MindShift podcast explores the innovations in education that are shaping how kids learn. Hosts Ki Sung and Katrina Schwartz introduce listeners to educators, researchers, parents and students who are developing effective ways to improve how kids learn. We cover topics like how fed-up administrators are developing surprising tactics to deal with classroom disruptions; how listening to podcasts are helping kids develop reading skills; the consequences of overparenting; and why interdisciplinary learning can engage students on all ends of the traditional achievement spectrum. This podcast is part of the MindShift education site, a division of KQED News. KQED is an NPR/PBS member station based in San Francisco. You can also visit the MindShift website for episodes and supplemental blog posts or tweet us \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/MindShiftKQED\">@MindShiftKQED\u003c/a> or visit us at \u003ca href=\"/mindshift\">MindShift.KQED.org\u003c/a>",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mindshift-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED MindShift: How We Will Learn",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/mindshift/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 12
},
"link": "/podcasts/mindshift",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mindshift-podcast/id1078765985",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM1NzY0NjAwNDI5",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/464615685/mind-shift-podcast",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/stories-teachers-share",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/0MxSpNYZKNprFLCl7eEtyx"
}
},
"morning-edition": {
"id": "morning-edition",
"title": "Morning Edition",
"info": "\u003cem>Morning Edition\u003c/em> takes listeners around the country and the world with multi-faceted stories and commentaries every weekday. Hosts Steve Inskeep, David Greene and Rachel Martin bring you the latest breaking news and features to prepare you for the day.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 3am-9am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Morning-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/morning-edition/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/morning-edition"
},
"onourwatch": {
"id": "onourwatch",
"title": "On Our Watch",
"tagline": "Deeply-reported investigative journalism",
"info": "For decades, the process for how police police themselves has been inconsistent – if not opaque. In some states, like California, these proceedings were completely hidden. After a new police transparency law unsealed scores of internal affairs files, our reporters set out to examine these cases and the shadow world of police discipline. On Our Watch brings listeners into the rooms where officers are questioned and witnesses are interrogated to find out who this system is really protecting. Is it the officers, or the public they've sworn to serve?",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/On-Our-Watch-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "On Our Watch from NPR and KQED",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/onourwatch",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 11
},
"link": "/podcasts/onourwatch",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1567098962",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5ucHIub3JnLzUxMDM2MC9wb2RjYXN0LnhtbD9zYz1nb29nbGVwb2RjYXN0cw",
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/onourwatch",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/0OLWoyizopu6tY1XiuX70x",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/On-Our-Watch-p1436229/",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/show/on-our-watch",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510360/podcast.xml"
}
},
"on-the-media": {
"id": "on-the-media",
"title": "On The Media",
"info": "Our weekly podcast explores how the media 'sausage' is made, casts an incisive eye on fluctuations in the marketplace of ideas, and examines threats to the freedom of information and expression in America and abroad. For one hour a week, the show tries to lift the veil from the process of \"making media,\" especially news media, because it's through that lens that we see the world and the world sees us",
"airtime": "SUN 2pm-3pm, MON 12am-1am",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/onTheMedia.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/otm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "wnyc"
},
"link": "/radio/program/on-the-media",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/on-the-media/id73330715?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/On-the-Media-p69/",
"rss": "http://feeds.wnyc.org/onthemedia"
}
},
"pbs-newshour": {
"id": "pbs-newshour",
"title": "PBS NewsHour",
"info": "Analysis, background reports and updates from the PBS NewsHour putting today's news in context.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 3pm-4pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/PBS-News-Hour-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "pbs"
},
"link": "/radio/program/pbs-newshour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/pbs-newshour-full-show/id394432287?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/PBS-NewsHour---Full-Show-p425698/",
"rss": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/feeds/rss/podcasts/show"
}
},
"perspectives": {
"id": "perspectives",
"title": "Perspectives",
"tagline": "KQED's series of daily listener commentaries since 1991",
"info": "KQED's series of daily listener commentaries since 1991.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Perspectives_Tile_Final.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Perspectives",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/perspectives/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 14
},
"link": "/perspectives",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id73801135",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432309616/perspectives",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/perspectives/category/perspectives/feed/",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93dzIua3FlZC5vcmcvcGVyc3BlY3RpdmVzL2NhdGVnb3J5L3BlcnNwZWN0aXZlcy9mZWVkLw"
}
},
"planet-money": {
"id": "planet-money",
"title": "Planet Money",
"info": "The economy explained. Imagine you could call up a friend and say, Meet me at the bar and tell me what's going on with the economy. Now imagine that's actually a fun evening.",
"airtime": "SUN 3pm-4pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/planetmoney.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/sections/money/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/planet-money",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/M4f5",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/planet-money/id290783428?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Business--Economics-Podcasts/Planet-Money-p164680/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510289/podcast.xml"
}
},
"politicalbreakdown": {
"id": "politicalbreakdown",
"title": "Political Breakdown",
"tagline": "Politics from a personal perspective",
"info": "Political Breakdown is a new series that explores the political intersection of California and the nation. Each week hosts Scott Shafer and Marisa Lagos are joined with a new special guest to unpack politics -- with personality — and offer an insider’s glimpse at how politics happens.",
"airtime": "THU 6:30pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Political-Breakdown-2024-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Political Breakdown",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/politicalbreakdown",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 5
},
"link": "/podcasts/politicalbreakdown",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/political-breakdown/id1327641087",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/e0c2d153-ad36-4c8d-901d-f1da6a724824/political-breakdown",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/572155894/political-breakdown",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/political-breakdown",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/07RVyIjIdk2WDuVehvBMoN",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/political-breakdown/feed/podcast"
}
},
"possible": {
"id": "possible",
"title": "Possible",
"info": "Possible is hosted by entrepreneur Reid Hoffman and writer Aria Finger. Together in Possible, Hoffman and Finger lead enlightening discussions about building a brighter collective future. The show features interviews with visionary guests like Trevor Noah, Sam Altman and Janette Sadik-Khan. Possible paints an optimistic portrait of the world we can create through science, policy, business, art and our shared humanity. It asks: What if everything goes right for once? How can we get there? Each episode also includes a short fiction story generated by advanced AI GPT-4, serving as a thought-provoking springboard to speculate how humanity could leverage technology for good.",
"airtime": "SUN 2pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Possible-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.possible.fm/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "Possible"
},
"link": "/radio/program/possible",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/possible/id1677184070",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/730YpdUSNlMyPQwNnyjp4k"
}
},
"pri-the-world": {
"id": "pri-the-world",
"title": "PRI's The World: Latest Edition",
"info": "Each weekday, host Marco Werman and his team of producers bring you the world's most interesting stories in an hour of radio that reminds us just how small our planet really is.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 2pm-3pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-World-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.pri.org/programs/the-world",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "PRI"
},
"link": "/radio/program/pri-the-world",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/pris-the-world-latest-edition/id278196007?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/News--Politics-Podcasts/PRIs-The-World-p24/",
"rss": "http://feeds.feedburner.com/pri/theworld"
}
},
"radiolab": {
"id": "radiolab",
"title": "Radiolab",
"info": "A two-time Peabody Award-winner, Radiolab is an investigation told through sounds and stories, and centered around one big idea. In the Radiolab world, information sounds like music and science and culture collide. Hosted by Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich, the show is designed for listeners who demand skepticism, but appreciate wonder. WNYC Studios is the producer of other leading podcasts including Freakonomics Radio, Death, Sex & Money, On the Media and many more.",
"airtime": "SUN 12am-1am, SAT 2pm-3pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/radiolab1400.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/radiolab/",
"meta": {
"site": "science",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/radiolab",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/radiolab/id152249110?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/RadioLab-p68032/",
"rss": "https://feeds.wnyc.org/radiolab"
}
},
"reveal": {
"id": "reveal",
"title": "Reveal",
"info": "Created by The Center for Investigative Reporting and PRX, Reveal is public radios first one-hour weekly radio show and podcast dedicated to investigative reporting. Credible, fact based and without a partisan agenda, Reveal combines the power and artistry of driveway moment storytelling with data-rich reporting on critically important issues. The result is stories that inform and inspire, arming our listeners with information to right injustices, hold the powerful accountable and improve lives.Reveal is hosted by Al Letson and showcases the award-winning work of CIR and newsrooms large and small across the nation. In a radio and podcast market crowded with choices, Reveal focuses on important and often surprising stories that illuminate the world for our listeners.",
"airtime": "SAT 4pm-5pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/reveal300px.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.revealnews.org/episodes/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/reveal",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/reveal/id886009669",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Reveal-p679597/",
"rss": "http://feeds.revealradio.org/revealpodcast"
}
},
"rightnowish": {
"id": "rightnowish",
"title": "Rightnowish",
"tagline": "Art is where you find it",
"info": "Rightnowish digs into life in the Bay Area right now… ish. Journalist Pendarvis Harshaw takes us to galleries painted on the sides of liquor stores in West Oakland. We'll dance in warehouses in the Bayview, make smoothies with kids in South Berkeley, and listen to classical music in a 1984 Cutlass Supreme in Richmond. Every week, Pen talks to movers and shakers about how the Bay Area shapes what they create, and how they shape the place we call home.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Rightnowish-Podcast-Tile-500x500-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Rightnowish with Pendarvis Harshaw",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/rightnowish",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 16
},
"link": "/podcasts/rightnowish",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/721590300/rightnowish",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/arts/programs/rightnowish/feed/podcast",
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rightnowish/id1482187648",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/rightnowish",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkMxMjU5MTY3NDc4",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/7kEJuafTzTVan7B78ttz1I"
}
},
"science-friday": {
"id": "science-friday",
"title": "Science Friday",
"info": "Science Friday is a weekly science talk show, broadcast live over public radio stations nationwide. Each week, the show focuses on science topics that are in the news and tries to bring an educated, balanced discussion to bear on the scientific issues at hand. Panels of expert guests join host Ira Flatow, a veteran science journalist, to discuss science and to take questions from listeners during the call-in portion of the program.",
"airtime": "FRI 11am-1pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Science-Friday-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/science-friday",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/science-friday",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=73329284&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Science-Friday-p394/",
"rss": "http://feeds.wnyc.org/science-friday"
}
},
"snap-judgment": {
"id": "snap-judgment",
"title": "Snap Judgment",
"tagline": "Real stories with killer beats",
"info": "The Snap Judgment radio show and podcast mixes real stories with killer beats to produce cinematic, dramatic radio. Snap's musical brand of storytelling dares listeners to see the world through the eyes of another. This is storytelling... with a BEAT!! Snap first aired on public radio stations nationwide in July 2010. Today, Snap Judgment airs on over 450 public radio stations and is brought to the airwaves by KQED & PRX.",
"airtime": "SAT 1pm-2pm, 9pm-10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Snap-Judgment-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Snap Judgment",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://snapjudgment.org",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 4
},
"link": "https://snapjudgment.org",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/snap-judgment/id283657561",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/449018144/snap-judgment",
"stitcher": "https://www.pandora.com/podcast/snap-judgment/PC:241?source=stitcher-sunset",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3Cct7ZWmxHNAtLgBTqjC5v",
"rss": "https://snap.feed.snapjudgment.org/"
}
},
"soldout": {
"id": "soldout",
"title": "SOLD OUT: Rethinking Housing in America",
"tagline": "A new future for housing",
"info": "Sold Out: Rethinking Housing in America",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Sold-Out-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Sold Out: Rethinking Housing in America",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/soldout",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 13
},
"link": "/podcasts/soldout",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/911586047/s-o-l-d-o-u-t-a-new-future-for-housing",
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/introducing-sold-out-rethinking-housing-in-america/id1531354937",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/soldout",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/38dTBSk2ISFoPiyYNoKn1X",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/sold-out-rethinking-housing-in-america",
"tunein": "https://tunein.com/radio/SOLD-OUT-Rethinking-Housing-in-America-p1365871/"
}
},
"spooked": {
"id": "spooked",
"title": "Spooked",
"tagline": "True-life supernatural stories",
"info": "",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Spooked-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Spooked",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://spookedpodcast.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 7
},
"link": "https://spookedpodcast.org/",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spooked/id1279361017",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/549547848/snap-judgment-presents-spooked",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/76571Rfl3m7PLJQZKQIGCT",
"rss": "https://feeds.simplecast.com/TBotaapn"
}
},
"tech-nation": {
"id": "tech-nation",
"title": "Tech Nation Radio Podcast",
"info": "Tech Nation is a weekly public radio program, hosted by Dr. Moira Gunn. Founded in 1993, it has grown from a simple interview show to a multi-faceted production, featuring conversations with noted technology and science leaders, and a weekly science and technology-related commentary.",
"airtime": "FRI 10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Tech-Nation-Radio-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://technation.podomatic.com/",
"meta": {
"site": "science",
"source": "Tech Nation Media"
},
"link": "/radio/program/tech-nation",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://technation.podomatic.com/rss2.xml"
}
},
"ted-radio-hour": {
"id": "ted-radio-hour",
"title": "TED Radio Hour",
"info": "The TED Radio Hour is a journey through fascinating ideas, astonishing inventions, fresh approaches to old problems, and new ways to think and create.",
"airtime": "SUN 3pm-4pm, SAT 10pm-11pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/tedRadioHour.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/?showDate=2018-06-22",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/ted-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/8vsS",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=523121474&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/TED-Radio-Hour-p418021/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510298/podcast.xml"
}
},
"thebay": {
"id": "thebay",
"title": "The Bay",
"tagline": "Local news to keep you rooted",
"info": "Host Devin Katayama walks you through the biggest story of the day with reporters and newsmakers.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Bay-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Bay",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/thebay",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 2
},
"link": "/podcasts/thebay",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-bay/id1350043452",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/d800ea4c-7a2c-42f2-b861-edaf78a5db0b/the-bay",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/586725995/the-bay",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-bay",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/4BIKBKIujizLHlIlBNaAqQ",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC8259786327"
}
},
"thelatest": {
"id": "thelatest",
"title": "The Latest",
"tagline": "Trusted local news in real time",
"info": "",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/The-Latest-2025-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Latest",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/thelatest",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 6
},
"link": "/thelatest",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-latest-from-kqed/id1197721799",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/1257949365/the-latest-from-k-q-e-d",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/5KIIXMgM9GTi5AepwOYvIZ?si=bd3053fec7244dba",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC9137121918"
}
},
"theleap": {
"id": "theleap",
"title": "The Leap",
"tagline": "What if you closed your eyes, and jumped?",
"info": "Stories about people making dramatic, risky changes, told by award-winning public radio reporter Judy Campbell.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Leap-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Leap",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/theleap",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 17
},
"link": "/podcasts/theleap",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-leap/id1046668171",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/447248267/the-leap",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-leap",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3sSlVHHzU0ytLwuGs1SD1U",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/programs/the-leap/feed/podcast"
}
},
"the-moth-radio-hour": {
"id": "the-moth-radio-hour",
"title": "The Moth Radio Hour",
"info": "Since its launch in 1997, The Moth has presented thousands of true stories, told live and without notes, to standing-room-only crowds worldwide. Moth storytellers stand alone, under a spotlight, with only a microphone and a roomful of strangers. The storyteller and the audience embark on a high-wire act of shared experience which is both terrifying and exhilarating. Since 2008, The Moth podcast has featured many of our favorite stories told live on Moth stages around the country. For information on all of our programs and live events, visit themoth.org.",
"airtime": "SAT 8pm-9pm and SUN 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/theMoth.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://themoth.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "prx"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-moth-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-moth-podcast/id275699983?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/The-Moth-p273888/",
"rss": "http://feeds.themoth.org/themothpodcast"
}
},
"the-new-yorker-radio-hour": {
"id": "the-new-yorker-radio-hour",
"title": "The New Yorker Radio Hour",
"info": "The New Yorker Radio Hour is a weekly program presented by the magazine's editor, David Remnick, and produced by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Each episode features a diverse mix of interviews, profiles, storytelling, and an occasional burst of humor inspired by the magazine, and shaped by its writers, artists, and editors. This isn't a radio version of a magazine, but something all its own, reflecting the rich possibilities of audio storytelling and conversation. Theme music for the show was composed and performed by Merrill Garbus of tUnE-YArDs.",
"airtime": "SAT 10am-11am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-New-Yorker-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/tnyradiohour",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-new-yorker-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1050430296",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/WNYC-Podcasts/New-Yorker-Radio-Hour-p803804/",
"rss": "https://feeds.feedburner.com/newyorkerradiohour"
}
},
"the-sam-sanders-show": {
"id": "the-sam-sanders-show",
"title": "The Sam Sanders Show",
"info": "One of public radio's most dynamic voices, Sam Sanders helped launch The NPR Politics Podcast and hosted NPR's hit show It's Been A Minute. Now, the award-winning host returns with something brand new, The Sam Sanders Show. Every week, Sam Sanders and friends dig into the culture that shapes our lives: what's driving the biggest trends, how artists really think, and even the memes you can't stop scrolling past. Sam is beloved for his way of unpacking the world and bringing you up close to fresh currents and engaging conversations. The Sam Sanders Show is smart, funny and always a good time.",
"airtime": "FRI 12-1pm AND SAT 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-Sam-Sanders-Show-Podcast-Tile-400x400-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.kcrw.com/shows/the-sam-sanders-show/latest",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "KCRW"
},
"link": "https://www.kcrw.com/shows/the-sam-sanders-show/latest",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://feed.cdnstream1.com/zjb/feed/download/ac/28/59/ac28594c-e1d0-4231-8728-61865cdc80e8.xml"
}
},
"the-splendid-table": {
"id": "the-splendid-table",
"title": "The Splendid Table",
"info": "\u003cem>The Splendid Table\u003c/em> hosts our nation's conversations about cooking, sustainability and food culture.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Splendid-Table-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.splendidtable.org/",
"airtime": "SUN 10-11 pm",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-splendid-table"
},
"this-american-life": {
"id": "this-american-life",
"title": "This American Life",
"info": "This American Life is a weekly public radio show, heard by 2.2 million people on more than 500 stations. Another 2.5 million people download the weekly podcast. It is hosted by Ira Glass, produced in collaboration with Chicago Public Media, delivered to stations by PRX The Public Radio Exchange, and has won all of the major broadcasting awards.",
"airtime": "SAT 12pm-1pm, 7pm-8pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/thisAmericanLife.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.thisamericanlife.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "wbez"
},
"link": "/radio/program/this-american-life",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=201671138&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"rss": "https://www.thisamericanlife.org/podcast/rss.xml"
}
},
"tinydeskradio": {
"id": "tinydeskradio",
"title": "Tiny Desk Radio",
"info": "We're bringing the best of Tiny Desk to the airwaves, only on public radio.",
"airtime": "SUN 8pm and SAT 9pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/300x300-For-Member-Station-Logo-Tiny-Desk-Radio-@2x.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/series/g-s1-52030/tiny-desk-radio",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/tinydeskradio",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/g-s1-52030/rss.xml"
}
},
"wait-wait-dont-tell-me": {
"id": "wait-wait-dont-tell-me",
"title": "Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!",
"info": "Peter Sagal and Bill Kurtis host the weekly NPR News quiz show alongside some of the best and brightest news and entertainment personalities.",
"airtime": "SUN 10am-11am, SAT 11am-12pm, SAT 6pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Wait-Wait-Podcast-Tile-300x300-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/wait-wait-dont-tell-me/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/wait-wait-dont-tell-me",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/Xogv",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=121493804&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Wait-Wait-Dont-Tell-Me-p46/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/344098539/podcast.xml"
}
},
"weekend-edition-saturday": {
"id": "weekend-edition-saturday",
"title": "Weekend Edition Saturday",
"info": "Weekend Edition Saturday wraps up the week's news and offers a mix of analysis and features on a wide range of topics, including arts, sports, entertainment, and human interest stories. The two-hour program is hosted by NPR's Peabody Award-winning Scott Simon.",
"airtime": "SAT 5am-10am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Weekend-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/weekend-edition-saturday/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/weekend-edition-saturday"
},
"weekend-edition-sunday": {
"id": "weekend-edition-sunday",
"title": "Weekend Edition Sunday",
"info": "Weekend Edition Sunday features interviews with newsmakers, artists, scientists, politicians, musicians, writers, theologians and historians. The program has covered news events from Nelson Mandela's 1990 release from a South African prison to the capture of Saddam Hussein.",
"airtime": "SUN 5am-10am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Weekend-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/weekend-edition-sunday/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/weekend-edition-sunday"
}
},
"racesReducer": {},
"racesGenElectionReducer": {},
"racesGenElection2026Reducer": {},
"racesGenElection2026PresidentialReducer": {},
"radioSchedulesReducer": {},
"listsReducer": {
"posts/news?program=close-all-tabs": {
"isFetching": false,
"latestQuery": {
"from": 48,
"size": 12
},
"vitalsOnly": false,
"totalRequested": 12,
"isLoading": false,
"isLoadingMore": true,
"total": {
"value": 88,
"relation": "eq"
},
"items": [
"news_12060973",
"news_12059911",
"news_12058992",
"news_12058181",
"news_12057327",
"news_12056209",
"news_12055408",
"news_12053843",
"news_12052900",
"news_12051989",
"news_12051056",
"news_12050185"
],
"complete": true
}
},
"recallGuideReducer": {
"intros": {},
"policy": {},
"candidates": {}
},
"savedArticleReducer": {
"articles": [],
"status": {}
},
"newslettersReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"newsletters": {},
"isSubscribing": false,
"isUnsubscribing": false,
"subscribedNewsletters": {}
},
"termsReducer": {
"about": {
"name": "About",
"type": "terms",
"id": "about",
"slug": "about",
"link": "/about",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"arts": {
"name": "Arts & Culture",
"grouping": [
"arts",
"pop",
"trulyca"
],
"description": "KQED Arts provides daily in-depth coverage of the Bay Area's music, art, film, performing arts, literature and arts news, as well as cultural commentary and criticism.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "arts",
"slug": "arts",
"link": "/arts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"artschool": {
"name": "Art School",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "artschool",
"slug": "artschool",
"link": "/artschool",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"bayareabites": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "bayareabites",
"slug": "bayareabites",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"bayareahiphop": {
"name": "Bay Area Hiphop",
"type": "terms",
"id": "bayareahiphop",
"slug": "bayareahiphop",
"link": "/bayareahiphop",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"campaign21": {
"name": "Campaign 21",
"type": "terms",
"id": "campaign21",
"slug": "campaign21",
"link": "/campaign21",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"careers": {
"name": "Careers",
"type": "terms",
"id": "careers",
"slug": "careers",
"link": "/careers",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"checkplease": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "checkplease",
"slug": "checkplease",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"education": {
"name": "Education",
"grouping": [
"education"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "education",
"slug": "education",
"link": "/education",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"elections": {
"name": "Elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "elections",
"slug": "elections",
"link": "/elections",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"events": {
"name": "Events",
"type": "terms",
"id": "events",
"slug": "events",
"link": "/events",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"event": {
"name": "Event",
"alias": "events",
"type": "terms",
"id": "event",
"slug": "event",
"link": "/event",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"filmschoolshorts": {
"name": "Film School Shorts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "filmschoolshorts",
"slug": "filmschoolshorts",
"link": "/filmschoolshorts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"food": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "food",
"slug": "food",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"forum": {
"name": "Forum",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/forum?",
"parent": "news",
"type": "terms",
"id": "forum",
"slug": "forum",
"link": "/forum",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"futureofyou": {
"name": "Future of You",
"grouping": [
"science",
"futureofyou"
],
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "futureofyou",
"slug": "futureofyou",
"link": "/futureofyou",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"jpepinheart": {
"name": "KQED food",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/food,bayareabites,checkplease",
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "jpepinheart",
"slug": "jpepinheart",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"liveblog": {
"name": "Live Blog",
"type": "terms",
"id": "liveblog",
"slug": "liveblog",
"link": "/liveblog",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"livetv": {
"name": "Live TV",
"parent": "tv",
"type": "terms",
"id": "livetv",
"slug": "livetv",
"link": "/livetv",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"lowdown": {
"name": "The Lowdown",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/lowdown?",
"parent": "news",
"type": "terms",
"id": "lowdown",
"slug": "lowdown",
"link": "/lowdown",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"mindshift": {
"name": "Mindshift",
"parent": "news",
"description": "MindShift explores the future of education by highlighting the innovative – and sometimes counterintuitive – ways educators and parents are helping all children succeed.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "mindshift",
"slug": "mindshift",
"link": "/mindshift",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"news": {
"name": "News",
"grouping": [
"news",
"forum"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "news",
"slug": "news",
"link": "/news",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"newsletters": {
"name": "newsletters",
"type": "terms",
"id": "newsletters",
"slug": "newsletters",
"link": "/newsletters",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"perspectives": {
"name": "Perspectives",
"parent": "radio",
"type": "terms",
"id": "perspectives",
"slug": "perspectives",
"link": "/perspectives",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"podcasts": {
"name": "Podcasts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "podcasts",
"slug": "podcasts",
"link": "/podcasts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"pop": {
"name": "Pop",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "pop",
"slug": "pop",
"link": "/pop",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"pressroom": {
"name": "Pressroom",
"type": "terms",
"id": "pressroom",
"slug": "pressroom",
"link": "/pressroom",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"quest": {
"name": "Quest",
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "quest",
"slug": "quest",
"link": "/quest",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"radio": {
"name": "Radio",
"grouping": [
"forum",
"perspectives"
],
"description": "Listen to KQED Public Radio – home of Forum and The California Report – on 88.5 FM in San Francisco, 89.3 FM in Sacramento, 88.3 FM in Santa Rosa and 88.1 FM in Martinez.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "radio",
"slug": "radio",
"link": "/radio",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"root": {
"name": "KQED",
"image": "https://ww2.kqed.org/app/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"imageWidth": 1200,
"imageHeight": 630,
"headData": {
"title": "KQED | News, Radio, Podcasts, TV | Public Media for Northern California",
"description": "KQED provides public radio, television, and independent reporting on issues that matter to the Bay Area. We’re the NPR and PBS member station for Northern California."
},
"type": "terms",
"id": "root",
"slug": "root",
"link": "/root",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"science": {
"name": "Science",
"grouping": [
"science",
"futureofyou"
],
"description": "KQED Science brings you award-winning science and environment coverage from the Bay Area and beyond.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "science",
"slug": "science",
"link": "/science",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"stateofhealth": {
"name": "State of Health",
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "stateofhealth",
"slug": "stateofhealth",
"link": "/stateofhealth",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"support": {
"name": "Support",
"type": "terms",
"id": "support",
"slug": "support",
"link": "/support",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"thedolist": {
"name": "The Do List",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "thedolist",
"slug": "thedolist",
"link": "/thedolist",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"trulyca": {
"name": "Truly CA",
"grouping": [
"arts",
"pop",
"trulyca"
],
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "trulyca",
"slug": "trulyca",
"link": "/trulyca",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"tv": {
"name": "TV",
"type": "terms",
"id": "tv",
"slug": "tv",
"link": "/tv",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"voterguide": {
"name": "Voter Guide",
"parent": "elections",
"alias": "elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "voterguide",
"slug": "voterguide",
"link": "/voterguide",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"guiaelectoral": {
"name": "Guia Electoral",
"parent": "elections",
"alias": "elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "guiaelectoral",
"slug": "guiaelectoral",
"link": "/guiaelectoral",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"news_program_close-all-tabs": {
"isLoading": true
},
"news_35082": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35082",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35082",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"slug": "close-all-tabs",
"taxonomy": "program",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Close All Tabs | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35099,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/program/close-all-tabs"
},
"source_news_12060973": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12060973",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12059911": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12059911",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12058992": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12058992",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12058181": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12058181",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12057327": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12057327",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12056209": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12056209",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12055408": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12055408",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12053843": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12053843",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12052900": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12052900",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12051989": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12051989",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12051056": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12051056",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"source_news_12050185": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "source_news_12050185",
"meta": {
"override": true
},
"name": "Close All Tabs",
"link": "https://www.kqed.org/podcasts/closealltabs",
"isLoading": false
},
"news_33520": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_33520",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "33520",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Podcast",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Podcast Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 33537,
"slug": "podcast",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/podcast"
},
"news_22973": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_22973",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "22973",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "culture",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "culture Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 22990,
"slug": "culture",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/culture"
},
"news_3137": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_3137",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "3137",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "internet",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "internet Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 3155,
"slug": "internet",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/internet"
},
"news_34646": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_34646",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "34646",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "internet culture",
"slug": "internet-culture",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "internet culture | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 34663,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/internet-culture"
},
"news_35689": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35689",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35689",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Labubus",
"slug": "labubus",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Labubus | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35706,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/labubus"
},
"news_1089": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1089",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1089",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "social media",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "social media Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1100,
"slug": "social-media",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/social-media"
},
"news_33732": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_33732",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "33732",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Technology",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "interest",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Technology Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 33749,
"slug": "technology",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/interest/technology"
},
"news_25184": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_25184",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "25184",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "AI",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "AI Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 25201,
"slug": "ai",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/ai"
},
"news_32664": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_32664",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "32664",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "AI software",
"slug": "ai-software",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "AI software | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 32681,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/ai-software"
},
"news_34755": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_34755",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "34755",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "artificial intelligence",
"slug": "artificial-intelligence",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "artificial intelligence | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 34772,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/artificial-intelligence"
},
"news_1631": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1631",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1631",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Technology",
"slug": "technology",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Technology | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 1643,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/technology"
},
"news_35092": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35092",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35092",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "closealltabs",
"slug": "closealltabs",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "closealltabs | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35109,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/closealltabs"
},
"news_28161": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_28161",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "28161",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "dating",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "dating Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 28178,
"slug": "dating",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/dating"
},
"news_23908": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_23908",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "23908",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "tariffs",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "tariffs Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 23925,
"slug": "tariffs",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/tariffs"
},
"news_2109": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2109",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2109",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "mental health",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "mental health Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2124,
"slug": "mental-health",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/mental-health"
},
"news_856": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_856",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "856",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Religion",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Religion Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 866,
"slug": "religion",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/religion"
},
"news_5345": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_5345",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "5345",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "the rapture",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "the rapture Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 5367,
"slug": "the-rapture",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/the-rapture"
},
"news_35881": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35881",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35881",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "charlie kirk",
"slug": "charlie-kirk",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "charlie kirk | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35898,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/charlie-kirk"
},
"news_22434": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_22434",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "22434",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "death",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "death Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 22451,
"slug": "death",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/death"
},
"news_35111": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35111",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35111",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "meme",
"slug": "meme",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "meme | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35128,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/meme"
},
"news_34305": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_34305",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "34305",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "political violence",
"slug": "political-violence",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "political violence | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 34322,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/political-violence"
},
"news_17968": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_17968",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "17968",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Politics",
"slug": "politics",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Politics | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 18002,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/politics"
},
"news_35194": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35194",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35194",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "23andMe",
"slug": "23andme",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "23andMe | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35211,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/23andme"
},
"news_22844": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_22844",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "22844",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Data Privacy",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Data Privacy Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 22861,
"slug": "data-privacy",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/data-privacy"
},
"news_2331": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2331",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2331",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "DNA",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "DNA Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2346,
"slug": "dna",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/dna"
},
"news_34569": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_34569",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "34569",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "DNA testing",
"slug": "dna-testing",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "DNA testing | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 34586,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/dna-testing"
},
"news_2414": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2414",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2414",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Internet Privacy",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Internet Privacy Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2429,
"slug": "internet-privacy",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/internet-privacy"
},
"news_2125": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2125",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2125",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "online privacy",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "online privacy Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2140,
"slug": "online-privacy",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/online-privacy"
},
"news_20013": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_20013",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "20013",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "education",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "education Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 20030,
"slug": "education",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/education"
},
"news_3457": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_3457",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "3457",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Students",
"slug": "students",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Students | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 3475,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/students"
},
"news_2044": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2044",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2044",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "teachers",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "teachers Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2059,
"slug": "teachers",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/teachers"
},
"news_18085": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_18085",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "18085",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "College",
"slug": "college",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "College | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 18119,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/college"
},
"news_17731": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_17731",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "17731",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "documentary",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "documentary Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 17765,
"slug": "documentary",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/documentary"
},
"news_19374": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_19374",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "19374",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "documentary film",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "documentary film Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 19391,
"slug": "documentary-film",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/documentary-film"
},
"news_6699": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_6699",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "6699",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "University",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "University Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 6723,
"slug": "university",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/university"
},
"news_2451": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2451",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2451",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Instagram",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Instagram Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2466,
"slug": "instagram",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/instagram"
},
"news_29435": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_29435",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "29435",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "tiktok",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "tiktok Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 29452,
"slug": "tiktok",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/tiktok"
},
"news_23393": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_23393",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "23393",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "language",
"slug": "language",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "language | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 23410,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/language"
},
"news_24509": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_24509",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "24509",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "linguistics",
"slug": "linguistics",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "linguistics | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 24526,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/linguistics"
},
"news_22585": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_22585",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "22585",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "YouTube",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "YouTube Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 22602,
"slug": "youtube",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/youtube"
},
"news_34645": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_34645",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "34645",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "close all tabs",
"slug": "close-all-tabs",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "close all tabs | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null,
"metaRobotsNoIndex": "noindex"
},
"ttid": 34662,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/close-all-tabs"
},
"news_21027": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_21027",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "21027",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "ICE",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "ICE Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 21044,
"slug": "ice",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/ice"
},
"news_35692": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_35692",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "35692",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "influencers",
"slug": "influencers",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "influencers | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 35709,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/influencers"
}
},
"userPermissionsReducer": {
"wpLoggedIn": false
},
"eventsReducer": {},
"fssReducer": {},
"tvDailyScheduleReducer": {},
"tvWeeklyScheduleReducer": {},
"tvPrimetimeScheduleReducer": {},
"tvMonthlyScheduleReducer": {},
"userAccountReducer": {
"user": {
"email": null,
"emailStatus": "EMAIL_UNVALIDATED",
"loggedStatus": "LOGGED_OUT",
"loggingChecked": false,
"articles": [],
"firstName": null,
"lastName": null,
"phoneNumber": null,
"fetchingMembership": false,
"membershipError": false,
"memberships": [
{
"id": null,
"startDate": null,
"firstName": null,
"lastName": null,
"familyNumber": null,
"memberNumber": null,
"memberSince": null,
"expirationDate": null,
"pfsEligible": false,
"isSustaining": false,
"membershipLevel": "Prospect",
"membershipStatus": "Non Member",
"lastGiftDate": null,
"renewalDate": null,
"lastDonationAmount": null
}
]
},
"authModal": {
"isOpen": false,
"view": "LANDING_VIEW"
},
"error": null
},
"youthMediaReducer": {},
"checkPleaseReducer": {
"filterData": {
"region": {
"key": "Restaurant Region",
"filters": [
"Any Region"
]
},
"cuisine": {
"key": "Restaurant Cuisine",
"filters": [
"Any Cuisine"
]
}
},
"restaurantDataById": {},
"restaurantIdsSorted": [],
"error": null
},
"userAgentReducer": {
"userAgent": "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)",
"isBot": true
},
"requestOutcomesReducer": {
"notFound": []
},
"navPromosReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": true,
"promos": {
"news": {
"name": "2026 Voter Guide",
"link": "/voterguide",
"imageURL": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/10/Nav-News-Nov2026ElectionCoverage@2x-7bd4aad4.png",
"description": "Get informed in minutes with our Voter Guide for California’s November 3 election."
},
"podcasts-radio": {},
"video-tv": {},
"events": {},
"support": {}
}
}
}