window.__IS_SSR__=true
window.__INITIAL_STATE__={
"attachmentsReducer": {
"audio_0": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_0",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background0.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_1": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_1",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background1.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_2": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_2",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background2.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_3": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_3",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background3.jpg"
}
}
},
"audio_4": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "audio_4",
"imgSizes": {
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/themes/KQED-unified/img/audio_bgs/background4.jpg"
}
}
},
"placeholder": {
"type": "attachments",
"id": "placeholder",
"imgSizes": {
"thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-160x107.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 107,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"medium": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-800x533.jpg",
"width": 800,
"height": 533,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"medium_large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-768x512.jpg",
"width": 768,
"height": 512,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"large": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"1536x1536": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1536x1024.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 1024,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-lrg": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1536x1024.jpg",
"width": 1536,
"height": 1024,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-med": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"fd-sm": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-800x533.jpg",
"width": 800,
"height": 533,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"post-thumbnail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"twentyfourteen-full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1038x576.jpg",
"width": 1038,
"height": 576,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xxsmall": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-160x107.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 107,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xsmall": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"small": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-672x372.jpg",
"width": 672,
"height": 372,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"xlarge": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1020x680.jpg",
"width": 1020,
"height": 680,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"full-width": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1-1920x1280.jpg",
"width": 1920,
"height": 1280,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-32": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 32,
"height": 32,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-50": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 50,
"height": 50,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-64": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 64,
"height": 64,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-96": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 96,
"height": 96,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"guest-author-128": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 128,
"height": 128,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"detail": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-1333x1333-1-160x160.jpg",
"width": 160,
"height": 160,
"mimeType": "image/jpeg"
},
"kqedFullSize": {
"file": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/KQED-Default-Image-816638274-2000x1333-1.jpg",
"width": 2000,
"height": 1333
}
}
}
},
"audioPlayerReducer": {
"postId": "stream_live",
"isPaused": true,
"isPlaying": false,
"pfsActive": false,
"pledgeModalIsOpen": true,
"playerDrawerIsOpen": false,
"liveAudioPlayStartedAt": 0,
"liveAudioPlayContext": ""
},
"authorsReducer": {
"jbrooks": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "80",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "80",
"found": true
},
"name": "Jon Brooks",
"firstName": "Jon",
"lastName": "Brooks",
"slug": "jbrooks",
"email": "jbrooks@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": true,
"staff_mastheads": [
"science"
],
"title": "Digital Editor",
"bio": "Jon Brooks is a former Digital Editor for KQED Science. He is the former editor of KQED’s daily news blog, News Fix. In 2014, he won a California Journalism Award for his coverage of ride services like Uber and Lyft and the taxi industry. A veteran blogger, he previously worked for Yahoo! in various news writing and editing roles. Jon is also a playwright whose work has been produced in San Francisco, New York, Italy, and around the U.S. He has written about film for his own blog and studied film at Boston University.",
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98887f7ed1c876ed414d4c915e969584?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": "jbrooksfoy",
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "arts",
"roles": [
"Contributor",
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"author"
]
},
{
"site": "futureofyou",
"roles": [
"administrator"
]
},
{
"site": "mindshift",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "stateofhealth",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
},
{
"site": "science",
"roles": [
"administrator"
]
},
{
"site": "quest",
"roles": [
"editor"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Jon Brooks | KQED",
"description": "Digital Editor",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98887f7ed1c876ed414d4c915e969584?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/98887f7ed1c876ed414d4c915e969584?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/jbrooks"
},
"amystanden": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "210",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "210",
"found": true
},
"name": "Amy Standen",
"firstName": "Amy",
"lastName": "Standen",
"slug": "amystanden",
"email": "astanden@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": "KQED Contributor",
"bio": "Amy Standen (@amystanden) is co-host of #\u003ca href=\"https://ww2.kqed.org/news/programs/the-leap\">TheLeapPodcast\u003c/a> (subscribe on iTunes or Stitcher!) and host of KQED and PBSDigital Studios' science video series, \u003ca href=\"https://www.youtube.com/user/KQEDDeepLook\">Deep Look\u003c/a>. Her science radio stories appear on KQED and NPR.\r\n\r\nEmail her at astanden@kqed.org",
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3d021b72de685a788b0487b059d0a6a1?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"subscriber"
]
},
{
"site": "futureofyou",
"roles": [
"subscriber"
]
},
{
"site": "stateofhealth",
"roles": [
"subscriber"
]
},
{
"site": "science",
"roles": []
},
{
"site": "quest",
"roles": [
"subscriber"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Amy Standen | KQED",
"description": "KQED Contributor",
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3d021b72de685a788b0487b059d0a6a1?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/3d021b72de685a788b0487b059d0a6a1?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/amystanden"
},
"kqednewsstaffandwires": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "237",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "237",
"found": true
},
"name": "KQED News Staff and Wires",
"firstName": "KQED News Staff and Wires",
"lastName": null,
"slug": "kqednewsstaffandwires",
"email": "onlinenewsstaff@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": null,
"bio": null,
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/72295af8ebbfbd19a4948f5271285664?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "arts",
"roles": [
"contributor"
]
},
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"contributor"
]
},
{
"site": "lowdown",
"roles": [
"author"
]
},
{
"site": "stateofhealth",
"roles": [
"contributor"
]
},
{
"site": "food",
"roles": [
"author"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "KQED News Staff and Wires | KQED",
"description": null,
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/72295af8ebbfbd19a4948f5271285664?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/72295af8ebbfbd19a4948f5271285664?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/kqednewsstaffandwires"
},
"racheldornhelm": {
"type": "authors",
"id": "252",
"meta": {
"index": "authors_1716337520",
"id": "252",
"found": true
},
"name": "Rachel Dornhelm",
"firstName": "Rachel",
"lastName": "Dornhelm",
"slug": "racheldornhelm",
"email": "rdornhelm@kqed.org",
"display_author_email": false,
"staff_mastheads": [],
"title": null,
"bio": "\u003cp dir=\"ltr\">Rachel Dornhelm has worked as a reporter, editor and producer in public radio for the last twelve years. She got her start in New York City at WNYC and went on to work with the national business program Marketplace, WBUR’s “On Point” and KQED News in San Francisco. Her work has been honored by the LA Press Club and the SF-Peninsula Press Club.\u003c/p>\r\n\r\nRachel has a BA with honors in anthropology from Rice University and did graduate work at NYU.",
"avatar": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7eee8d9bf9f919dcc4573841641db363?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twitter": null,
"facebook": null,
"instagram": null,
"linkedin": null,
"sites": [
{
"site": "news",
"roles": [
"author"
]
},
{
"site": "stateofhealth",
"roles": [
"author"
]
},
{
"site": "quest",
"roles": [
"subscriber"
]
}
],
"headData": {
"title": "Rachel Dornhelm | KQED",
"description": null,
"ogImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7eee8d9bf9f919dcc4573841641db363?s=600&d=blank&r=g",
"twImgSrc": "https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/7eee8d9bf9f919dcc4573841641db363?s=600&d=blank&r=g"
},
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/author/racheldornhelm"
}
},
"pagesReducer": {
"news_category_transportation": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1397",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1397",
"score": 12.936693
},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Transportation",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Transportation Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1409,
"slug": "transportation",
"isLoading": false,
"title": "Transportation",
"pageMeta": {
"site": "news",
"WpPageTemplate": "page-topic-editorial",
"currentPage": 151
},
"blocks": [
{
"blockName": "kqed/post-list",
"attrs": {
"layout": "cardArticle2",
"query": "posts/news?category=transportation",
"seeMore": false,
"paginated": true,
"page": 151
}
},
{
"blockName": "kqed/ad"
}
]
}
},
"pfsSessionReducer": {},
"postsReducer": {
"stream_live": {
"type": "live",
"id": "stream_live",
"audioUrl": "https://streams.kqed.org/kqedradio",
"title": "Live Stream",
"excerpt": "Live Stream information currently unavailable.",
"link": "/radio",
"featImg": "",
"label": {
"name": "KQED Live",
"link": "/"
}
},
"stream_kqedNewscast": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "stream_kqedNewscast",
"audioUrl": "https://www.kqed.org/.stream/anon/radio/RDnews/newscast.mp3?_=1",
"title": "KQED Newscast",
"featImg": "",
"label": {
"name": "88.5 FM",
"link": "/"
}
},
"news_51954": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_51954",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "51954",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1325606823000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1325606823,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "Morning Fog Alert for Bay Area Bridges",
"title": "Morning Fog Alert for Bay Area Bridges",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cp>(Bay City News) Fog advisories have been issued throughout the early morning for many Bay Area bridges, according to the California Highway Patrol.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Drivers on the Benicia Bridge have been alerted about foggy weather as of 3:24 a.m., according to the CHP.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Earlier in the morning the CHP issued fog advisories for the San Mateo, Bay, Golden Gate and Carquinez bridges. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The National Weather Service has also issued a dense fog advisory for the San Francisco, Suisun and Monterey bays and nearby regions as of 3:55 a.m.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The advisory will be in effect until 10 a.m., weather officials said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Visibility in affected areas is at a half mile or less, according to the NWS.\u003c/p>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "51954 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=51954",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2012/01/03/morning-fog-alert-for-bay-area-bridges/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 121,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 8
},
"modified": 1325606873,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "(Bay City News) Fog advisories have been issued throughout the early morning for many Bay Area bridges, according to the California Highway Patrol. Drivers on the Benicia Bridge have been alerted about foggy weather as of 3:24 a.m., according to the CHP. Earlier in the morning the CHP issued fog advisories for the San Mateo,",
"title": "Morning Fog Alert for Bay Area Bridges | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Morning Fog Alert for Bay Area Bridges",
"datePublished": "2012-01-03T08:07:03-08:00",
"dateModified": "2012-01-03T08:07:53-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "morning-fog-alert-for-bay-area-bridges",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/51954/morning-fog-alert-for-bay-area-bridges",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>(Bay City News) Fog advisories have been issued throughout the early morning for many Bay Area bridges, according to the California Highway Patrol.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Drivers on the Benicia Bridge have been alerted about foggy weather as of 3:24 a.m., according to the CHP.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Earlier in the morning the CHP issued fog advisories for the San Mateo, Bay, Golden Gate and Carquinez bridges. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The National Weather Service has also issued a dense fog advisory for the San Francisco, Suisun and Monterey bays and nearby regions as of 3:55 a.m.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The advisory will be in effect until 10 a.m., weather officials said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Visibility in affected areas is at a half mile or less, according to the NWS.\u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/51954/morning-fog-alert-for-bay-area-bridges",
"authors": [
"237"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_19906",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_2192"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_51225": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_51225",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "51225",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1324683303000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1324683303,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose Holiday Schedule, Parking",
"title": "San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose Holiday Schedule, Parking",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cp>\u003cstrong>San Francisco \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>Parking meters, street sweeping, commuter tow away, and residential parking permits will \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfmta.com/cms/apress/SFMTAWeekendTransitAndTrafficAdvisory.htm\">not be enforced\u003c/a> Monday, Dec 26. But on Port of San Francisco property, you will have to feed the meters as usual.\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>Muni will operate on a normal weekday schedule.\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sfmta.com/cms/asystem/alerts.php\">Transit updates from SFMTA\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>City offices will observe the Christmas holiday on \u003ca href=\"http://www6.sfgov.org/index.aspx?page=143\">Monday, December 26\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Oakland\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>From the \u003ca href=\"http://www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca/groups/cityadministrator/documents/pressrelease/oak032730.pdf\">city administrator's office\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"The City of Oakland administrative offices will be closed between Monday, December 26 and Monday, January 2 for a combination of City holidays and business closure days as a result of budget cutbacks.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Parking enforcement: \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>● Saturday, December 24 is a Parking “Holiday.” Parking at all parking meters will be free for the posted period of time (30 minutes, 1 hour or 2 hours). The free parking “holiday” applies to both standard meters and the parking kiosks that are located in many commercial districts. Standard parking rules and time limits apply – if shoppers need additional parking time, they will need to move their car. The City will be monitoring parked cars on a regular basis.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>● December 25 and 26, and January 1 and 2 are parking holidays during which motorists do not need to pay for parking at City meters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>● Regular enforcement will occur throughout the City for all parking violations on December 27 – 31.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>All libraries will also be closed Dec 24 through Jan 2. More \u003ca href=\"http://www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca/groups/cityadministrator/documents/pressrelease/oak032730.pdf\">info on city services during the holidays\u003c/a> here (pdf).\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>San Jose\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>From the \u003ca href=\"https://www.piersystem.com/go/doc/1914/1259327/\">City of San Jose:\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"San José City Hall and other City offices will close on Friday, December 23, 2011 through Monday, January 2, 2012 for the holiday furlough.\" \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.piersystem.com/go/doc/1914/1259327/\">Information on libraries, community centers, and city parks here\u003c/a> (pdf)\u003c/p>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "51225 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=51225",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/23/san-francisco-oakland-san-jose-holiday-schedule-parking/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 295,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 16
},
"modified": 1324942740,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "San Francisco Parking meters, street sweeping, commuter tow away, and residential parking permits will not be enforced Monday, Dec 26. But on Port of San Francisco property, you will have to feed the meters as usual. Muni will operate on a normal weekday schedule. Transit updates from SFMTA City offices will observe the Christmas holiday",
"title": "San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose Holiday Schedule, Parking | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "San Francisco, Oakland, San Jose Holiday Schedule, Parking",
"datePublished": "2011-12-23T15:35:03-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-12-26T15:39:00-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "san-francisco-oakland-san-jose-holiday-schedule-parking",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/51225/san-francisco-oakland-san-jose-holiday-schedule-parking",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>San Francisco \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>Parking meters, street sweeping, commuter tow away, and residential parking permits will \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfmta.com/cms/apress/SFMTAWeekendTransitAndTrafficAdvisory.htm\">not be enforced\u003c/a> Monday, Dec 26. But on Port of San Francisco property, you will have to feed the meters as usual.\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>Muni will operate on a normal weekday schedule.\n\u003c/li>\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sfmta.com/cms/asystem/alerts.php\">Transit updates from SFMTA\u003c/a>\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>City offices will observe the Christmas holiday on \u003ca href=\"http://www6.sfgov.org/index.aspx?page=143\">Monday, December 26\u003c/a>.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Oakland\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>From the \u003ca href=\"http://www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca/groups/cityadministrator/documents/pressrelease/oak032730.pdf\">city administrator's office\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"The City of Oakland administrative offices will be closed between Monday, December 26 and Monday, January 2 for a combination of City holidays and business closure days as a result of budget cutbacks.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Parking enforcement: \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>● Saturday, December 24 is a Parking “Holiday.” Parking at all parking meters will be free for the posted period of time (30 minutes, 1 hour or 2 hours). The free parking “holiday” applies to both standard meters and the parking kiosks that are located in many commercial districts. Standard parking rules and time limits apply – if shoppers need additional parking time, they will need to move their car. The City will be monitoring parked cars on a regular basis.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>● December 25 and 26, and January 1 and 2 are parking holidays during which motorists do not need to pay for parking at City meters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>● Regular enforcement will occur throughout the City for all parking violations on December 27 – 31.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>All libraries will also be closed Dec 24 through Jan 2. More \u003ca href=\"http://www2.oaklandnet.com/oakca/groups/cityadministrator/documents/pressrelease/oak032730.pdf\">info on city services during the holidays\u003c/a> here (pdf).\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>San Jose\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>From the \u003ca href=\"https://www.piersystem.com/go/doc/1914/1259327/\">City of San Jose:\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"San José City Hall and other City offices will close on Friday, December 23, 2011 through Monday, January 2, 2012 for the holiday furlough.\" \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"https://www.piersystem.com/go/doc/1914/1259327/\">Information on libraries, community centers, and city parks here\u003c/a> (pdf)\u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/51225/san-francisco-oakland-san-jose-holiday-schedule-parking",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_50031": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_50031",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "50031",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1323881769000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1323881769,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "Oakland Enacts Five-Minute 'Grace Period' on Expired Parking Meters",
"title": "Oakland Enacts Five-Minute 'Grace Period' on Expired Parking Meters",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cp>(Bay City News) People who overstay their time at parking meters in Oakland will have a short grace period under a new policy approved Tuesday by the Oakland City Council's Finance Committee.\u003c/p>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_50034\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 250px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/parkingmeter.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/parkingmeter-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"parkingmeter\" width=\"250\" height=\"166\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-50034\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: compujeramey/Flickr\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>The new policy is the brainchild of Councilwoman Jane Brunner, who said she wants to provide convenient parking in front of Oakland businesses and ease friction between the city and residents over parking enforcement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Under the new policy, which takes effect immediately, people who use one of the city's pay-and-display parking meters will be given a five-minute grace period from the expiration time displayed on their receipt.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>However, the policy is more complicated for people who use old-fashioned coin-fed meters \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Brunner said the grace period depends on when parkers return to their cars and when parking meter officers check the meters because there isn't a precise way of checking the exact time at which people feed their meters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The basic idea is that a parker will get a break, rather than a ticket, if they return to their car while an officer is writing up a ticket, even if the time on the meter had been expired for a long period, Brunner said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>However, an officer could give a ticket to someone only a minute after their time expired if the person wasn't around at that time, she said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In a report to her council colleagues before the meeting, Brunner said some residents have complained that their watches show a slightly different time than those on the pay-and-display meters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>She said, \"In those cases, a person may return to their car to find a ticket being issued even though their own watch shows that they have not yet reached the time for which they paid.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Brunner said, \"It is in the best interests of the city and its businesses and residents that shoppers who drive to Oakland's commercial districts be given a reasonable accommodation by the city with regard to the variation in time-telling instruments.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>She said her proposal \"eliminates one of the 'gotcha!' aspects of parking enforcement, making it easier to shop in Oakland.\" \u003c/p>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "50031 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=50031",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/14/oakland-enacts-five-minute-grace-period-on-expired-parking-meters/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 365,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 13
},
"modified": 1323882551,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "(Bay City News) People who overstay their time at parking meters in Oakland will have a short grace period under a new policy approved Tuesday by the Oakland City Council's Finance Committee. The new policy is the brainchild of Councilwoman Jane Brunner, who said she wants to provide convenient parking in front of Oakland businesses",
"title": "Oakland Enacts Five-Minute 'Grace Period' on Expired Parking Meters | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Oakland Enacts Five-Minute 'Grace Period' on Expired Parking Meters",
"datePublished": "2011-12-14T08:56:09-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-12-14T09:09:11-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "oakland-enacts-five-minute-grace-period-on-expired-parking-meters",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/50031/oakland-enacts-five-minute-grace-period-on-expired-parking-meters",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>(Bay City News) People who overstay their time at parking meters in Oakland will have a short grace period under a new policy approved Tuesday by the Oakland City Council's Finance Committee.\u003c/p>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_50034\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 250px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/parkingmeter.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/parkingmeter-300x199.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"parkingmeter\" width=\"250\" height=\"166\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-50034\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: compujeramey/Flickr\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>The new policy is the brainchild of Councilwoman Jane Brunner, who said she wants to provide convenient parking in front of Oakland businesses and ease friction between the city and residents over parking enforcement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Under the new policy, which takes effect immediately, people who use one of the city's pay-and-display parking meters will be given a five-minute grace period from the expiration time displayed on their receipt.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>However, the policy is more complicated for people who use old-fashioned coin-fed meters \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Brunner said the grace period depends on when parkers return to their cars and when parking meter officers check the meters because there isn't a precise way of checking the exact time at which people feed their meters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The basic idea is that a parker will get a break, rather than a ticket, if they return to their car while an officer is writing up a ticket, even if the time on the meter had been expired for a long period, Brunner said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>However, an officer could give a ticket to someone only a minute after their time expired if the person wasn't around at that time, she said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In a report to her council colleagues before the meeting, Brunner said some residents have complained that their watches show a slightly different time than those on the pay-and-display meters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>She said, \"In those cases, a person may return to their car to find a ticket being issued even though their own watch shows that they have not yet reached the time for which they paid.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Brunner said, \"It is in the best interests of the city and its businesses and residents that shoppers who drive to Oakland's commercial districts be given a reasonable accommodation by the city with regard to the variation in time-telling instruments.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>She said her proposal \"eliminates one of the 'gotcha!' aspects of parking enforcement, making it easier to shop in Oakland.\" \u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/50031/oakland-enacts-five-minute-grace-period-on-expired-parking-meters",
"authors": [
"237"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_18"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_49866": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_49866",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "49866",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1323822938000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1323822938,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "Did Rank-and-File Union Members Support the Port Shutdown?",
"title": "Did Rank-and-File Union Members Support the Port Shutdown?",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cp>During our coverage of the Oakland port shutdown yesterday, we wrote a little bit about labor's decidedly tepid if not negative response to Occupy Oakland's protest on behalf of Longview, Washington ILWU workers in a \u003ca href=\"http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-longshoremen-arrests-idUSTRE78K7TC20110921\">dispute\u003c/a> with the grain exporter EGT.\u003c/p>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_49982\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 248px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/OaklandPort111212forum.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/OaklandPort111212forum.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"OaklandPort111212forum\" width=\"248\" height=\"140\" class=\"size-full wp-image-49982\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Caitlin Esch/KQED\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>The leadership of the ILWU as well as various locals declared their opposition to the action. From Chronicle columnist Andrew S. Ross this weekend, \u003ca href=\"http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-12-08/business/30489379_1_shutdown-international-longshore-warehouse-union\">Union not keen on new Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp> (T)he folks [protesters] purport to be in solidarity with don't seem hot on the idea to \"effectively shut down the hubs of commerce\" at all.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \"Any actions organized by outside groups, including the proposed Dec. 12 shutdown of various terminals on the West Coast, have not been vetted by our union's democratically led process,\" the International Longshore and Warehouse Union said. \"Any decisions made by groups outside of the union's democratic process do not hold water, regardless of the intent.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> The Occupy movements that make a fetish of applying direct democracy and near absolute consensus to its own decision making might want to take note of that.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Richard Mead, president of ILWU Local 10, which represents dockworkers at the Port of Oakland, said, \"Our position is in the international's press release. We're not facilitating (Occupy Oakland's strike call) in any way. We just want that clear.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Jeff Smith, president of ILWU Local 8 in Portland, Ore., went further, telling the Portland Tribune his union won't honor picket lines. \"This is a third-party strike. We have to go to work,\" he said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>But the Occupy movement says the union rank and file supported the protest. Occupy Oakland's Barucha Peller, who participated in the organizing of the attempted port shutdowns, said this to KQED's Mina Kim during the planning stages of the port action:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"The rank and file traditionally will honor community picket lines around social justice issues. I think the longshoremen are not unaware of the aims of the Occupy movement and a lot of those aims speak to them as well. Rank and file are also part of the Occupy movement, not separate. Across the board, rank and file union members as well as non-unionized workers, make up a large part of the Occupy movement.\" \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But whether the majority of affected union members actually supported yesterday's action -- or not -- I'm not sure anyone really knows. Here's a comment we received on the blog yesterday:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>I'm a union worker. I lost a much needed day of pay today. I went to observe the occupiers for hours today. FACT: Most workers were upset with them. FACT: There were only a handful of people that worked there involved in the protest. Most union and non union port workers were upset and negatively affected financially.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Yesterday, at the protest, KQED News Intern Rebecca Wolfson interviewed a business rep for the machinists union, which represents some port workers. Garry Horrocks had this to say: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp>I think a lot of union members are split because philosophically they believe in what's going on but there's contractual issues the unions have to recognize, and they have liabilities and assets to lose if they don't follow the legalities in the contract. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There's what they call a fiduciary responsiblity of the members of the union to protect the assets, bc if ther are no assets, there's no funding, there's no revolution, there's no unions. \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Yesterday, on KQED Radio's Forum show, ILWU Communications Director Craig Merrilees expressed support for the Occupy movement while somewhat gingerly reaffirming the union's opposition to the port action: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>I think almost everyone in the ILWU supports the goals of the 99% and nobody's done more than the Occupy movement to raise that issue. They've done a fabulous job of changing the debate in this country in a positive way so that people begin to have a sense of power. The ILWU has a long history of social justice and that kind of activism is part of the culture of this union.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As for this particular day, the union is not taking a position supporting this action, but that was really because of the lack of a process to allow the longshore workers – the rank and file, members – to participate in that decision. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But there are individuals who are exercising their First Amendment rights to take a stand, but the union itself is not in that position today.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>When asked if the union was \"ticked off\" that it wasn't consulted in the decision to demonstrate, he said, \"I don't think ticked off is the right word in any way. There's a position of respect here; I think the ILWU is grateful and respectful that people are standing up and raising concerns about the injustice that's taking place in America….there continues to be a lot of good feeling towards the thrust of what folks in the Occupy movement are trying to achieve.\"\n\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Below is Mina's Kim's interview with Occupy Oakland's Peller from a couple of weeks ago, in which Peller talks about the Occupy movement's reasons for focusing on the port. The conversation speaks to the question of and perhaps some of the contradictions inherent in an outside group taking on an issue specific to organized labor. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Edited transcript:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What is the port action about?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> It's about shutting down Wall Street on the waterfront. Shutting down Goldman Sachs, which owns a part of the SSA terminal, and EGT, a multiational grain exporter rupturing longshoremen jurisdiction in Longview, Washington.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We've identified the fact that a the 1% makes a great deal of its profit on the ports and on the backs of exploited labor.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Have you been working with longshoremen?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We've been working with rank-and-file longshoremen. Legally, no union can sanction a strike. There are no-strike clauses. But we're not asking for a strike, we're asking for a blockade like on Nov 2.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Historically, since the anti-apartheid movement, people will go down and create community pickets and shut down the ports. These ports are public, anyone can go down there and protest. We know that the longshoremen rank and file largely support the aims of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> As well, this west coast coordinated port blockade is in solidarity with the longshoremen's struggle against EGT in Longview Washington, which is ruptuing their jurisdition and is a direct threat to the survival of the ILWU. While the ILWU international may not be able to officially say anything about the port blockade, this is a large number of people taking on the issues that we all have with the 1%. EGT is not only a longshoreman issue, but they have economically plundered people from Argentina to Brazil and all around the world… And of course, Goldman Sachs owns a large part of the SSA terminal, and we all know what Goldman Sachs has done to a large part of our communities.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How would you respond to people who say that shutting down the port would hurt members of the 99% like truckers and other workers who need the shift?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> It's the same thing as in the general strike, where the right wing tried to accuse occupy Oakland of hurting small businesses. But we all have to make a sacrifice here, to strike back against the 1% and take our lives back from the 1%. This is what this movement is all about.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003cstrong>Did anyone from the Longview union ask you guys to shut down the port in solidarity with their fight?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> No. The occupation movement doesn't need to take marching orders from anyone. It's a mass of people self-organizing to get their material needs met and to strike back against he 1%. Of course we've been aware of the issue in Longview and applauding the resistance by the longshoremen up in Longview for resisting EGT, but like I said, EGT and other companies operating up there are a concern of everyone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Nobody from the longshoremen has asked the Occupy movement to do anything.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003cstrong>Are you worried about support from the union's rank and file, or do you think you definitely have their support?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> The rank and file traditionally will honor community picket lines around social justice issues. I think the longshoremen are not unaware of the aims of the Occupy movement and a lot of those aims speak to them as well. Rank and file are also part of the Occupy movement, not separate. Across the board, rank and file union members as well as non-unionized workers, make up a large part of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003cstrong>Any plans to coordinate more with the ILWU?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> It's a very sad thing what's happened to the unions in the U.S. because of no-strike clauses and different legal ramifications. It's sad that unions have to distance themselves from things like this for fear of being sued.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Nobody can speak for the leadership of the ILWU. But working class people understand that EGT and Goldman Sachs are Wall Street on the waterfront, and it's important to shut down Wall Street because of the way these big companies have plundered our lives.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Also released yesterday, \u003ca href=\"http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/\">An Open Letter from America’s Port Truck Drivers on Occupy the Ports\u003c/a>, signed by three port drivers and two other truckers:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>We are the front-line workers who haul container rigs full of imported and exported goods to and from the docks and warehouses every day.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We have been elected by committees of our co-workers at the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle, Tacoma, New York and New Jersey to tell our collective story. We have accepted the honor to speak up for our brothers and sisters about our working conditions despite the risk of retaliation we face. One of us is a mother, the rest of us fathers. Between the five of us we have 11children and one more baby on the way. We have a combined 46 years of experience driving cargo from our shores for America’s stores.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We are inspired that a non-violent democratic movement that insists on basic economic fairness is capturing the hearts and minds of so many working people. Thank you “99 Percenters” for hearing our call for justice. We are humbled and overwhelmed by recent attention. Normally we are invisible.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Today’s demonstrations will impact us. While we cannot officially speak for every worker who shares our occupation, we can use this opportunity to reveal what it’s like to walk a day in our shoes for the 110,000 of us in America whose job it is to be a port truck driver. It may be tempting for media to ask questions about whether we support a shutdown, but there are no easy answers. Instead, we ask you, are you willing to listen and learn why a one-word response is impossible? \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>The letter goes on to describe poor working conditions and a loss of labor rights in the trucking industry.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Expressing a different viewpoint yesterday were some of the truckers who told our reporter, Caitlin Esch, that they were really angry. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"A lot of the truckers came in from far away,\" Esch said. \"Nevada, Denver, Kansas, and so they're not leaving until they complete their task. The truckers say they're going to be living in their trucks until they can complete their assignments.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Related:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JUpBpZYwms&feature=player_embedded\">Video: ILWU Local 10 members speak out in support of Oakland port demonstration\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/occupy_vs_big_labor/\">Occupy vs. Big Labor\u003c/a> (Salon)\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/12/do-you-work-for-the-port-of-oakland-what-do-you-think/\">Do you work for the Port of Oakland? What do you think?\u003c/a> (News Fix)\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "49866 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=49866",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/13/did-rank-and-file-union-members-support-the-port-shutdown/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 1981,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 49
},
"modified": 1323823807,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "During our coverage of the Oakland port shutdown yesterday, we wrote a little bit about labor's decidedly tepid if not negative response to Occupy Oakland's protest on behalf of Longview, Washington ILWU workers in a dispute with the grain exporter EGT. The leadership of the ILWU as well as various locals declared their opposition to",
"title": "Did Rank-and-File Union Members Support the Port Shutdown? | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Did Rank-and-File Union Members Support the Port Shutdown?",
"datePublished": "2011-12-13T16:35:38-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-12-13T16:50:07-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "did-rank-and-file-union-members-support-the-port-shutdown",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/49866/did-rank-and-file-union-members-support-the-port-shutdown",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>During our coverage of the Oakland port shutdown yesterday, we wrote a little bit about labor's decidedly tepid if not negative response to Occupy Oakland's protest on behalf of Longview, Washington ILWU workers in a \u003ca href=\"http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-longshoremen-arrests-idUSTRE78K7TC20110921\">dispute\u003c/a> with the grain exporter EGT.\u003c/p>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_49982\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 248px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/OaklandPort111212forum.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/OaklandPort111212forum.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"OaklandPort111212forum\" width=\"248\" height=\"140\" class=\"size-full wp-image-49982\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Caitlin Esch/KQED\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>The leadership of the ILWU as well as various locals declared their opposition to the action. From Chronicle columnist Andrew S. Ross this weekend, \u003ca href=\"http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-12-08/business/30489379_1_shutdown-international-longshore-warehouse-union\">Union not keen on new Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp> (T)he folks [protesters] purport to be in solidarity with don't seem hot on the idea to \"effectively shut down the hubs of commerce\" at all.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \"Any actions organized by outside groups, including the proposed Dec. 12 shutdown of various terminals on the West Coast, have not been vetted by our union's democratically led process,\" the International Longshore and Warehouse Union said. \"Any decisions made by groups outside of the union's democratic process do not hold water, regardless of the intent.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> The Occupy movements that make a fetish of applying direct democracy and near absolute consensus to its own decision making might want to take note of that.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Richard Mead, president of ILWU Local 10, which represents dockworkers at the Port of Oakland, said, \"Our position is in the international's press release. We're not facilitating (Occupy Oakland's strike call) in any way. We just want that clear.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Jeff Smith, president of ILWU Local 8 in Portland, Ore., went further, telling the Portland Tribune his union won't honor picket lines. \"This is a third-party strike. We have to go to work,\" he said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>But the Occupy movement says the union rank and file supported the protest. Occupy Oakland's Barucha Peller, who participated in the organizing of the attempted port shutdowns, said this to KQED's Mina Kim during the planning stages of the port action:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"The rank and file traditionally will honor community picket lines around social justice issues. I think the longshoremen are not unaware of the aims of the Occupy movement and a lot of those aims speak to them as well. Rank and file are also part of the Occupy movement, not separate. Across the board, rank and file union members as well as non-unionized workers, make up a large part of the Occupy movement.\" \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But whether the majority of affected union members actually supported yesterday's action -- or not -- I'm not sure anyone really knows. Here's a comment we received on the blog yesterday:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>I'm a union worker. I lost a much needed day of pay today. I went to observe the occupiers for hours today. FACT: Most workers were upset with them. FACT: There were only a handful of people that worked there involved in the protest. Most union and non union port workers were upset and negatively affected financially.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Yesterday, at the protest, KQED News Intern Rebecca Wolfson interviewed a business rep for the machinists union, which represents some port workers. Garry Horrocks had this to say: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\n\u003cp>I think a lot of union members are split because philosophically they believe in what's going on but there's contractual issues the unions have to recognize, and they have liabilities and assets to lose if they don't follow the legalities in the contract. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There's what they call a fiduciary responsiblity of the members of the union to protect the assets, bc if ther are no assets, there's no funding, there's no revolution, there's no unions. \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Yesterday, on KQED Radio's Forum show, ILWU Communications Director Craig Merrilees expressed support for the Occupy movement while somewhat gingerly reaffirming the union's opposition to the port action: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>I think almost everyone in the ILWU supports the goals of the 99% and nobody's done more than the Occupy movement to raise that issue. They've done a fabulous job of changing the debate in this country in a positive way so that people begin to have a sense of power. The ILWU has a long history of social justice and that kind of activism is part of the culture of this union.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As for this particular day, the union is not taking a position supporting this action, but that was really because of the lack of a process to allow the longshore workers – the rank and file, members – to participate in that decision. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But there are individuals who are exercising their First Amendment rights to take a stand, but the union itself is not in that position today.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>When asked if the union was \"ticked off\" that it wasn't consulted in the decision to demonstrate, he said, \"I don't think ticked off is the right word in any way. There's a position of respect here; I think the ILWU is grateful and respectful that people are standing up and raising concerns about the injustice that's taking place in America….there continues to be a lot of good feeling towards the thrust of what folks in the Occupy movement are trying to achieve.\"\n\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Below is Mina's Kim's interview with Occupy Oakland's Peller from a couple of weeks ago, in which Peller talks about the Occupy movement's reasons for focusing on the port. The conversation speaks to the question of and perhaps some of the contradictions inherent in an outside group taking on an issue specific to organized labor. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Edited transcript:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What is the port action about?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> It's about shutting down Wall Street on the waterfront. Shutting down Goldman Sachs, which owns a part of the SSA terminal, and EGT, a multiational grain exporter rupturing longshoremen jurisdiction in Longview, Washington.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We've identified the fact that a the 1% makes a great deal of its profit on the ports and on the backs of exploited labor.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Have you been working with longshoremen?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We've been working with rank-and-file longshoremen. Legally, no union can sanction a strike. There are no-strike clauses. But we're not asking for a strike, we're asking for a blockade like on Nov 2.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Historically, since the anti-apartheid movement, people will go down and create community pickets and shut down the ports. These ports are public, anyone can go down there and protest. We know that the longshoremen rank and file largely support the aims of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> As well, this west coast coordinated port blockade is in solidarity with the longshoremen's struggle against EGT in Longview Washington, which is ruptuing their jurisdition and is a direct threat to the survival of the ILWU. While the ILWU international may not be able to officially say anything about the port blockade, this is a large number of people taking on the issues that we all have with the 1%. EGT is not only a longshoreman issue, but they have economically plundered people from Argentina to Brazil and all around the world… And of course, Goldman Sachs owns a large part of the SSA terminal, and we all know what Goldman Sachs has done to a large part of our communities.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How would you respond to people who say that shutting down the port would hurt members of the 99% like truckers and other workers who need the shift?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> It's the same thing as in the general strike, where the right wing tried to accuse occupy Oakland of hurting small businesses. But we all have to make a sacrifice here, to strike back against the 1% and take our lives back from the 1%. This is what this movement is all about.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003cstrong>Did anyone from the Longview union ask you guys to shut down the port in solidarity with their fight?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> No. The occupation movement doesn't need to take marching orders from anyone. It's a mass of people self-organizing to get their material needs met and to strike back against he 1%. Of course we've been aware of the issue in Longview and applauding the resistance by the longshoremen up in Longview for resisting EGT, but like I said, EGT and other companies operating up there are a concern of everyone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Nobody from the longshoremen has asked the Occupy movement to do anything.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003cstrong>Are you worried about support from the union's rank and file, or do you think you definitely have their support?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> The rank and file traditionally will honor community picket lines around social justice issues. I think the longshoremen are not unaware of the aims of the Occupy movement and a lot of those aims speak to them as well. Rank and file are also part of the Occupy movement, not separate. Across the board, rank and file union members as well as non-unionized workers, make up a large part of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003cstrong>Any plans to coordinate more with the ILWU?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> It's a very sad thing what's happened to the unions in the U.S. because of no-strike clauses and different legal ramifications. It's sad that unions have to distance themselves from things like this for fear of being sued.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Nobody can speak for the leadership of the ILWU. But working class people understand that EGT and Goldman Sachs are Wall Street on the waterfront, and it's important to shut down Wall Street because of the way these big companies have plundered our lives.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Also released yesterday, \u003ca href=\"http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/\">An Open Letter from America’s Port Truck Drivers on Occupy the Ports\u003c/a>, signed by three port drivers and two other truckers:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>We are the front-line workers who haul container rigs full of imported and exported goods to and from the docks and warehouses every day.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We have been elected by committees of our co-workers at the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle, Tacoma, New York and New Jersey to tell our collective story. We have accepted the honor to speak up for our brothers and sisters about our working conditions despite the risk of retaliation we face. One of us is a mother, the rest of us fathers. Between the five of us we have 11children and one more baby on the way. We have a combined 46 years of experience driving cargo from our shores for America’s stores.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> We are inspired that a non-violent democratic movement that insists on basic economic fairness is capturing the hearts and minds of so many working people. Thank you “99 Percenters” for hearing our call for justice. We are humbled and overwhelmed by recent attention. Normally we are invisible.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> Today’s demonstrations will impact us. While we cannot officially speak for every worker who shares our occupation, we can use this opportunity to reveal what it’s like to walk a day in our shoes for the 110,000 of us in America whose job it is to be a port truck driver. It may be tempting for media to ask questions about whether we support a shutdown, but there are no easy answers. Instead, we ask you, are you willing to listen and learn why a one-word response is impossible? \u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>The letter goes on to describe poor working conditions and a loss of labor rights in the trucking industry.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Expressing a different viewpoint yesterday were some of the truckers who told our reporter, Caitlin Esch, that they were really angry. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"A lot of the truckers came in from far away,\" Esch said. \"Nevada, Denver, Kansas, and so they're not leaving until they complete their task. The truckers say they're going to be living in their trucks until they can complete their assignments.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Related:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3JUpBpZYwms&feature=player_embedded\">Video: ILWU Local 10 members speak out in support of Oakland port demonstration\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.salon.com/2011/12/09/occupy_vs_big_labor/\">Occupy vs. Big Labor\u003c/a> (Salon)\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/12/do-you-work-for-the-port-of-oakland-what-do-you-think/\">Do you work for the Port of Oakland? What do you think?\u003c/a> (News Fix)\n\u003c/li>\u003c/ul>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/49866/did-rank-and-file-union-members-support-the-port-shutdown",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_19906",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_19904",
"news_18",
"news_2083",
"news_1963",
"news_854"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_49649": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_49649",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "49649",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1323735004000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1323735004,
"format": "aside",
"title": "Occupy Brings Protest to Oakland Port",
"headTitle": "Occupy Brings Protest to Oakland Port | KQED",
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_49693\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/occupyport2.jpg\">\u003cimg decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-49693\" title=\"occupyport2\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/occupyport2-300x203.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"203\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Officers from the Alameda County Sheriff Department create a line as Occupy protestors gather at berths 55 and 56 at the Port of Oakland. (Caitlin Esch/KQED)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/12/occupy-port-protest-live-tweets-from-reporters/#update\">Latest updates\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Today protesters are trying to shut down ports along the West Coast. In Oakland, protesters gathered around 5:30 a.m. at the West Oakland BART station. Our reporter Andrew Stelzer estimated about a thousand who then marched through the streets of West Oakland. From AP:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The protesters are targeting the locations because they believe American ports have become “economic engines for the elite.” They are most upset by two West Coast companies — giant West Coast port operator SSA Marine and grain exporter EGT — that they believe epitomize the big corporations that make up the “1 percent.” Goldman Sachs owns a major stake in SSA Marine, and the bank has been a repeated target of Occupy protesters since the movement began. The two port companies have also engaged in high-profile clashes with union workers lately, and the Occupy protesters want to stand up for the workers.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">\n\u003cp>More live coverage online:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.insidebayarea.com/oakland-tribune/ci_19528961\">Oakland Tribune live blog\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ustream.tv/channel/9636787\">Live video stream\u003c/a> (Spencer Mills)\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://twitter.com/#%21/search?q=%23occupytheports\">Twitter: #occupytheports\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>\u003ca name=\"update\">\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003ch1>Updates:\u003c/h1>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>10:30 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Signing Off\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’re calling it a day on the blogging Occupy front. We’ll be back tomorrow morning here on News Fix and on \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/radio/listen/\">KQED Radio\u003c/a> with the latest.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>7:40 p.m.\u003c/em> Occupy protestors decided to continue the protest during the general assembly, with some protestors staying at the berths until the 3 a.m. shift tomorrow morning.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>6:10 p.m.\u003c/em> KQED’s Caitlin Esch says that hundreds of protestors are gathered at berths 55 and 56 in Oakland. “It’s a dance party atmosphere, there trucks with huge amps on them and people are just dancing in the street,” she said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Protestors are holding a general assembly at the port at 7 p.m. to decide whether to extend the blockade until the 3 a.m. shift, since employers did not order any workers for Monday’s evening shift.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>4:58 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>The story according to the Chron…\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/12/BAJK1MBE5E.DTL\">Oakland port workers kept home as protesters march\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No longshore workers will be called in to the Port of Oakland tonight as Occupy protesters renew their efforts to blockade the docks, according to a spokesman for the International Longshore Workers Union. The decision, which could effective close port operations for the evening, came as several hundred protesters gathered outside Oakland City Hall at Frank Ogawa Plaza and began marching toward the waterfront behind a large banner that declared, “Port Closing.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>4:15 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>The story according to the Port of Oakland\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Protesters have already declared victory today; looks like the port is trying to do the same. It issued a press release this afternoon called “Myths and Facts About the Port of Oakland Protests”:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>While news reports today have for the most part accurately described protest activity at the Port of Oakland today, some incorrect information and rumors persist. The Port would like to separate fact from rumor:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: The Port of Oakland is closed.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Port is not closed. Operations have continued throughout the day after sporadic interruptions due to the morning protest activities.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As for the rest of the day and overnight, the Port anticipates very limited terminal activity.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: The Port of Oakland was shut down today.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Port remained operational today, even though there were disruptions throughout the morning that affected terminal operations and truck traffic. Trucks were moving cargo into and out of Port facilities as early as 7:00 a.m. and into and out of the majority of facilities by 10:30 a.m.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No ships were loaded or unloaded today. Yard and gate operations at some terminals continued regarding cargo that had already been unloaded. Some terminals could not operate at all because of protesters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Shifts were cancelled.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Terminal operators are responsible for ordering and cancelling shifts. No shifts were cancelled today. Some Longshoremen were unable to report to work for health and safety reasons. Some were released due to the inability to fill a labor order. As a result, some terminals were unable to operate normally.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Some or all terminals were closed today.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>All terminals opened today. Some were unable to accept cargo due to protesters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Oakland was the only west coast port impacted.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We understand from news reports that operators at the Port of Portland shut two terminals, affecting four ship operations. As a result, 200 Longshoreman were not able to work there. At the Port of LA and Long Beach, there was apparently minor operational impact and protesters were dispersed this morning. At the Port of Seattle, protest activity is expected later today and tonight.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Customs enforcement personnel were not at all terminals.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Some terminals experienced a delay in Customs personnel arrival.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: An arbitrator was called in and sent Longshoremen home.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Not true. Under the labor agreement between the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), an arbitrator may be called to determine if it is safe for workers to report to work. In this case, PMA decided not to call out the arbitrator. It remains possible that the ILWU may still request an arbitration to determine if they should to be paid for the inability to report to work but at no time today was an arbitrator called.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>4:07 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Scott Olsen speaks\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s a \u003ca href=\"http://www.twitvid.com/25KM5\">video interview with Scott Olsen\u003c/a> at today’s demonstration, giving an update on his health. The Iraqi War vet was critically injured by a projectile, ostensibly thrown by police, during a clash with Occupy Oakland protesters in October.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>3:35 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Occupy Oakland rally\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ustream.tv/occupyoakland\">\u003cstrong>Watch live here\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>2:55 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Terminal closure\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.vtnocal.com/default.asp?SiteID=TTI_OAK\">TTI’s announcement\u003c/a> that its Oakland terminal was unable to open for business today.\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Due to protesters who have congregated in front of the terminal’s main gate TTI will be unable to open for business today. We will resume operations tomorrow at the normal time.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>2:05 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Labor union support — or not\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Whether or not the affected labor unions support today’s action is a big topic of debate. On one side of the issue: An \u003ca href=\"http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/\">Open Letter from America’s Port Truck Drivers on Occupy the Ports\u003c/a>, signed by three port drivers and two other truckers:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>We are the front-line workers who haul container rigs full of imported and exported goods to and from the docks and warehouses every day.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have been elected by committees of our co-workers at the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle, Tacoma, New York and New Jersey to tell our collective story. We have accepted the honor to speak up for our brothers and sisters about our working conditions despite the risk of retaliation we face. One of us is a mother, the rest of us fathers. Between the five of us we have 11children and one more baby on the way. We have a combined 46 years of experience driving cargo from our shores for America’s stores.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We are inspired that a non-violent democratic movement that insists on basic economic fairness is capturing the hearts and minds of so many working people. Thank you “99 Percenters” for hearing our call for justice. We are humbled and overwhelmed by recent attention. Normally we are invisible.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Today’s demonstrations will impact us. While we cannot officially speak for every worker who shares our occupation, we can use this opportunity to reveal what it’s like to walk a day in our shoes for the 110,000 of us in America whose job it is to be a port truck driver. It may be tempting for media to ask questions about whether we support a shutdown, but there are no easy answers. Instead, we ask you, are you willing to listen and learn why a one-word response is impossible? \u003ca href=\"http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/\">Full letter\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>The letter goes on to describe poor working conditions and a loss of labor rights in the trucking industry.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Representing a different view: From Chronicle columnist Andrew S. Ross this weekend, \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/08/BUTP1M8VTI.DTL\">Union not keen on new Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(T)he folks [protesters] purport to be in solidarity with don’t seem hot on the idea to “effectively shut down the hubs of commerce” at all.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“Any actions organized by outside groups, including the proposed Dec. 12 shutdown of various terminals on the West Coast, have not been vetted by our union’s democratically led process,” the International Longshore and Warehouse Union said. “Any decisions made by groups outside of the union’s democratic process do not hold water, regardless of the intent.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Occupy movements that make a fetish of applying direct democracy and near absolute consensus to its own decision making might want to take note of that.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Richard Mead, president of ILWU Local 10, which represents dockworkers at the Port of Oakland, said, “Our position is in the international’s press release. We’re not facilitating (Occupy Oakland’s strike call) in any way. We just want that clear.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Jeff Smith, president of ILWU Local 8 in Portland, Ore., went further, telling the Portland Tribune his union won’t honor picket lines. “This is a third-party strike. We have to go to work,” he said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>A couple of weeks ago, KQED’s Mina Kim spoke to Occupy Oakland’s Barucha Peller, who described herself as a member of the Coordinated West Coast Port Blockade Assembly. Peller talks about the Occupy movement’s reasons for focusing on the port. The conversation speaks to the question and perhaps some of the contradictions inherent in an outside group taking on an issue specific to organized labor. Edited transcript:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What is the port action about? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s about shutting down Wall Street on the waterfront. Shutting down Goldman Sachs, which owns a part of the SSA terminal, and EGT, a multiational grain exporter rupturing \u003ca href=\"http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-longshoremen-arrests-idUSTRE78K7TC20110921\">longshoremen jurisdiction\u003c/a> in Longview, Washington.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve identified the fact that a the 1% makes a great deal of its profit on the ports and on the backs of exploited labor.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Have you been working with longshoremen? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve been working with rank-and-file longshoremen. Legally, no union can sanction a strike. There are no-strike clauses. But we’re not asking for a strike, we’re asking for a blockade like on Nov 2.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Historically, since the anti-apartheid movement, people will go down and create community pickets and shut down the ports. These ports are public, anyone can go down there and protest. We know that the longshoremen rank and file largely support the aims of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As well, this west coast coordinated port blockade is in solidarity with the longshoremen’s struggle against EGT in Longview Washington, which is ruptuing their jurisdition and is a direct threat to the survival of the ILWU. While the ILWU international may not be able to officially say anything about the port blockade, this is a large number of people taking on the issues that we all have with the 1%. EGT is not only a longshoreman issue, but they have economically plundered people from Argentina to Brazil and all around the world… And of course, Goldman Sachs owns a large part of the SSA terminal, and we all know what Goldman Sachs has done to a large part of our communities.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How would you respond to people who say that shutting down the port would hurt members of the 99% like truckers and other workers who need the shift? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s the same thing as in the general strike, where the right wing tried to accuse occupy Oakland of hurting small businesses. But we all have to make a sacrifice here, to strike back against the 1% and take our lives back from the 1%. This is what this movement is all about.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Did anyone from the Longview union ask you guys to shut down the port in solidarity with their fight? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No. The occupation movement doesn’t need to take marching orders from anyone. It’s a mass of people self-organizing to get their material needs met and to strike back against he 1%. Of course we’ve been aware of the issue in Longview and applauding the resistance by the longshoremen up in Longview for resisting EGT, but like I said, EGT and other companies operating up there are a concern of everyone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Nobody from the longshoremen has asked the Occupy movement to do anytning.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Are you worried about support from the union’s rank and file, or do you think you definitely have their support? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The rank and file traditionally will honor community picket lines around social justice issues. I think the longshoremen are not unaware of the aims of the Occupy movement and a lot of those aims speak to them as well. Rank and file are also part of the Occupy movement, not separate. Across the board, rank and file union members as well as non-unionized workers, make up a large part of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Any plans to coordinate more with the ILWU?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s a very sad thing what’s happened to the unions in the U.S. because of no-strike clauses and different legal ramifications. It’s sad that unions have to distance themselves from things like this for fear of being sued.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Nobody can speak for the leadership of the ILWU. But working class people understand that EGT and Goldman Sachs are Wall Street on the waterfront, and it’s important to shut down Wall Street because of the way these big companies have plundered our lives.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003cbr>\n\u003cem>1 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Workers sent home\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>From \u003ca href=\"http://sg.news.yahoo.com/protesters-halt-operations-western-ports-191912986.html\">AP\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>In Oakland, shipping companies and the longshoremen’s union agreed to send home about 150 workers, essentially halting operations at two terminals. In Portland, authorities shuttered two terminals after arresting two people who were carrying weapons.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>12:30 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Quan presser\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The press conference by Jean Quan and other Oakland officials was short and not particularly informative. Quan thanked police and protesters for keeping things peaceful. She asked the protesters to “respect the rights of the 99%” who are trying to work.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Quan also said the Port of Oakland is unique because it’s the “only port in the country” that exports more than imports. She said it’s particularly critical for agricultural shipments, and that 800,000 jobs across the country are linked to port shipments.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A reporter asked whether Quan has had a change of heart about actions against the port, as her husband had been out with protesters last month, during the general strike, when the port was shut down for a few hours. Quan said she has never supported any shutdown of the port, and that her husband was a “community monitor” during the first action.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Interim Police Chief Howard Jordan said there have been reports of violence or injury.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A port official said merely that there have been “impacts” at the terminals, mostly “backups” in terms of the truck traffic. He said he didn’t know if reports from protesters that “no ships were unloaded today” were true or not.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have calls out to the ILWU and the operator of one of the terminals, TTI, regarding the claim by protesters that the union has sent some workers home.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>12:15 p.m.\u003c/em> Live now from KGO, a \u003ca href=\"http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/livenow?id=8464068#&cmp=twi-kgo-livenow-8464068\">\u003cstrong>news conference regarding the Port of Oakland situation\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>. Mayor Jean Quan, City Administerator Deanna Santana, Chief of Police Howard Jordan, and port officials will speak.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>11:53 a.m.\u003c/em> \u003ca href=\"http://storify.com/kqednews/photos-dec-12-occupy-protests-at-port-of-oakland\">\u003cstrong>Photographic recap\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> put together by KQED’s Ian Hill.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>11:15 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Protesters Declare Victory\u003c/strong>\u003cem>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>KQED reporters Caitlin Esch and Andrew Stelzer report that Occupy protesters are leaving the Port of Oakland and declaring their efforts a success. The protesters blocked two terminals that were expecting shipments today. Drivers are starting to turn around their trucks and protesters are making their way back to Oakland. It is unclear whether protesters and workers will report for the Port’s second shift, which begins at 7:00 p.m. However, \u003ca href=\"http://www.hanjin.com/en/terminal/oakland.jsp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hanjin\u003c/a>, the shipping company that operates out of the blocked terminals has posted this notice \u003ca href=\"http://www.vtnocal.com/default.asp?SiteID=TTI_OAK\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> online\u003c/a>: “Due to protesters who have congregated in front of the terminal’s main gate TTI will be unable to open for business today. We will resume operations tomorrow at the normal time.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>9:45 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Former Quan Advisor at Port Protest\u003c/strong>\u003cem>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(Bay City News) – Oakland attorney Dan Siegel, Mayor Jean Quan’s former legal adviser, was among those participating in the march to the port this morning. Siegel resigned as Quan’s unpaid legal adviser on Nov. 14, the morning that police raided the Occupy Oakland encampment outside City Hall. He was leaving this morning’s protest at about 7:20 a.m., heading to a client’s court hearing.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>9:40 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Truckers Left Waiting\u003c/strong>\u003cem>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(Bay City News) – As of 9 a.m., hundreds of protesters had blocked off the entrance to Berths 30-32, and Alamed\u003cbr>\na County sheriff’s deputies were keeping an eye on hundreds more who had gathered at the entrance to Berths 55-56.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Dozens of trucks were lined up outside both entrances as drivers\u003cbr>\nwaited to get into the port. One truck driver, who declined to give his name, said he had come from Santa Rosa and had been waiting since 5 a.m. He said he anticipates that the port will be closed all day and is awaiting instructions on what to do with his cargo.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Protester Shake Anderson, who said he has been involved in the\u003cbr>\nOccupy Oakland movement since the beginning, said the demonstrators’ strategy is to keep a large crowd at the port to make it difficult for police to makearrests.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“It’s all about numbers,” he said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>9:11 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Trucker: ‘They Should Protest at the White House, Not Where I Am Trying to Make a Living’\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>8:45 a.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Report: Three Ports Blocked\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Caitlin Esch, who is at the port now, says at least three gates at the port are effectively blocked, with nothing moving in or out as protesters clog up the entrances. Trucks are lined up, some trying to drop off, some trying to pick up.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“A lot of the truckers came in from far away — Nevada, Denver, Kansas, and so they’re not leaving until they complete their task,” Esch says. The truckers say they’re going to be living in their trucks until they can complete their assignments. One trucker whom Esch talked to was trying to drop off beef from Denver; he was extremely angry.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>An Occupy Oakland organizer said the group would try to have at least 100 people marching in front of each entrance, but the three that Caitlin Esch has observed so far have had more than that number.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>8:06 a.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Protestor’s Live Stream\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Live video stream from Spencer Mills (aka \u003ca href=\"http://twitter.com/oakfosho\">OakFoSho\u003c/a> on Twitter), who has been live-streaming Occupy Oakland protests:\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align: center\">\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: 0px none transparent\" src=\"http://www.ustream.tv/embed/9636787\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" width=\"480\" height=\"296\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/div>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong> \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Occupy Movement Tries to Shut Down West Coast Ports\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(AP) OAKLAND, Calif. — Anti-Wall Street protesters along the West Coast joined an effort Monday to blockade some of the nation’s busiest docks, with the idea that if they cut off the ports, they cut into corporate profits.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The protesters are targeting the locations because they believe American ports have become “economic engines for the elite.” They are most upset by two West Coast companies — giant West Coast port operator SSA Marine and grain exporter EGT — that they believe epitomize the big corporations that make up the “1 percent.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Goldman Sachs owns a major stake in SSA Marine, and the bank has been a repeated target of Occupy protesters since the movement began. The two port companies have also engaged in high-profile clashes with union workers lately, and the Occupy protesters want to stand up for the workers.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Several hundred people began picketing at the Port of Oakland before dawn and blocked some trucks from going inside. Police are monitoring at the scene, but no major clashes have been reported so far. Occupy protesters successfully shut down the port in November.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In Southern California, as many as 400 demonstrators gathered in a park and planned to march on the Port of Long Beach. Occupy protesters said they plan to head to a dock facility owned by SSA Marine.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>About 300 people gathered at Kelly Point Park in Portland, Ore., and Kari Koch, organizer with Shut Down the Ports Working Group of Occupy Portland, said she expected hundreds more to picket the nearby terminal. Police arrested three people and seized a gun and sword from people who said they were on the way to the demonstration.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Occupy groups also planned blockades in Seattle, Tacoma, Wash., and Vancouver, British Columbia.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The protests being billed as action against “Wall Street on the waterfront” are perhaps the Occupy movement’s most dramatic gesture since police raids sent most remaining camps scattering last month. Demonstrators began forming those camps around the country about two months ago to protest what they call corporate greed and economic inequality.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“We will not stand for corporate profits at the expense of working people, we will not stand for attacks on workers, and we will not allow our schools to be closed, social services slashed, and families to be impoverished by your greed!” Koch said Monday in statement.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Related:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://westcoastportshutdown.org/sites/default/files/portmap.pdf\">Map of the Port of Oakland\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.occupyoakland.org/\">Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.occupytheports.com/\">Occupy the Ports web site\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\n",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": true,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 3720,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [
"http://www.ustream.tv/embed/9636787"
],
"paragraphCount": 111
},
"modified": 1685490609,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "Latest updates Today protesters are trying to shut down ports along the West Coast. In Oakland, protesters gathered around 5:30 a.m. at the West Oakland BART station. Our reporter Andrew Stelzer estimated about a thousand who then marched through the streets of West Oakland. From AP: The protesters are targeting the locations because they believe",
"title": "Occupy Brings Protest to Oakland Port | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Occupy Brings Protest to Oakland Port",
"datePublished": "2011-12-12T16:10:04-08:00",
"dateModified": "2023-05-30T16:50:09-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "occupy-port-protest-live-tweets-from-reporters",
"status": "publish",
"templateType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/49649/occupy-port-protest-live-tweets-from-reporters",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_49693\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/occupyport2.jpg\">\u003cimg decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-49693\" title=\"occupyport2\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/occupyport2-300x203.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"203\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Officers from the Alameda County Sheriff Department create a line as Occupy protestors gather at berths 55 and 56 at the Port of Oakland. (Caitlin Esch/KQED)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/12/occupy-port-protest-live-tweets-from-reporters/#update\">Latest updates\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>Today protesters are trying to shut down ports along the West Coast. In Oakland, protesters gathered around 5:30 a.m. at the West Oakland BART station. Our reporter Andrew Stelzer estimated about a thousand who then marched through the streets of West Oakland. From AP:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>The protesters are targeting the locations because they believe American ports have become “economic engines for the elite.” They are most upset by two West Coast companies — giant West Coast port operator SSA Marine and grain exporter EGT — that they believe epitomize the big corporations that make up the “1 percent.” Goldman Sachs owns a major stake in SSA Marine, and the bank has been a repeated target of Occupy protesters since the movement began. The two port companies have also engaged in high-profile clashes with union workers lately, and the Occupy protesters want to stand up for the workers.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003caside class=\"pullquote alignleft\">\n\u003cp>More live coverage online:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.insidebayarea.com/oakland-tribune/ci_19528961\">Oakland Tribune live blog\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ustream.tv/channel/9636787\">Live video stream\u003c/a> (Spencer Mills)\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://twitter.com/#%21/search?q=%23occupytheports\">Twitter: #occupytheports\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003c/aside>\n\u003cp>\u003ca name=\"update\">\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003ch1>Updates:\u003c/h1>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>10:30 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Signing Off\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’re calling it a day on the blogging Occupy front. We’ll be back tomorrow morning here on News Fix and on \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/radio/listen/\">KQED Radio\u003c/a> with the latest.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>7:40 p.m.\u003c/em> Occupy protestors decided to continue the protest during the general assembly, with some protestors staying at the berths until the 3 a.m. shift tomorrow morning.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>6:10 p.m.\u003c/em> KQED’s Caitlin Esch says that hundreds of protestors are gathered at berths 55 and 56 in Oakland. “It’s a dance party atmosphere, there trucks with huge amps on them and people are just dancing in the street,” she said.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Protestors are holding a general assembly at the port at 7 p.m. to decide whether to extend the blockade until the 3 a.m. shift, since employers did not order any workers for Monday’s evening shift.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>4:58 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>The story according to the Chron…\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/12/BAJK1MBE5E.DTL\">Oakland port workers kept home as protesters march\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No longshore workers will be called in to the Port of Oakland tonight as Occupy protesters renew their efforts to blockade the docks, according to a spokesman for the International Longshore Workers Union. The decision, which could effective close port operations for the evening, came as several hundred protesters gathered outside Oakland City Hall at Frank Ogawa Plaza and began marching toward the waterfront behind a large banner that declared, “Port Closing.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>4:15 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>The story according to the Port of Oakland\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Protesters have already declared victory today; looks like the port is trying to do the same. It issued a press release this afternoon called “Myths and Facts About the Port of Oakland Protests”:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>While news reports today have for the most part accurately described protest activity at the Port of Oakland today, some incorrect information and rumors persist. The Port would like to separate fact from rumor:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: The Port of Oakland is closed.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Port is not closed. Operations have continued throughout the day after sporadic interruptions due to the morning protest activities.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As for the rest of the day and overnight, the Port anticipates very limited terminal activity.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: The Port of Oakland was shut down today.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Port remained operational today, even though there were disruptions throughout the morning that affected terminal operations and truck traffic. Trucks were moving cargo into and out of Port facilities as early as 7:00 a.m. and into and out of the majority of facilities by 10:30 a.m.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No ships were loaded or unloaded today. Yard and gate operations at some terminals continued regarding cargo that had already been unloaded. Some terminals could not operate at all because of protesters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Shifts were cancelled.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Terminal operators are responsible for ordering and cancelling shifts. No shifts were cancelled today. Some Longshoremen were unable to report to work for health and safety reasons. Some were released due to the inability to fill a labor order. As a result, some terminals were unable to operate normally.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Some or all terminals were closed today.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>All terminals opened today. Some were unable to accept cargo due to protesters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Oakland was the only west coast port impacted.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We understand from news reports that operators at the Port of Portland shut two terminals, affecting four ship operations. As a result, 200 Longshoreman were not able to work there. At the Port of LA and Long Beach, there was apparently minor operational impact and protesters were dispersed this morning. At the Port of Seattle, protest activity is expected later today and tonight.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: Customs enforcement personnel were not at all terminals.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Some terminals experienced a delay in Customs personnel arrival.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Myth: An arbitrator was called in and sent Longshoremen home.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Not true. Under the labor agreement between the Pacific Maritime Association (PMA) and the International Longshore and Warehouse Union (ILWU), an arbitrator may be called to determine if it is safe for workers to report to work. In this case, PMA decided not to call out the arbitrator. It remains possible that the ILWU may still request an arbitration to determine if they should to be paid for the inability to report to work but at no time today was an arbitrator called.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>4:07 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Scott Olsen speaks\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Here’s a \u003ca href=\"http://www.twitvid.com/25KM5\">video interview with Scott Olsen\u003c/a> at today’s demonstration, giving an update on his health. The Iraqi War vet was critically injured by a projectile, ostensibly thrown by police, during a clash with Occupy Oakland protesters in October.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>3:35 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Occupy Oakland rally\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.ustream.tv/occupyoakland\">\u003cstrong>Watch live here\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>…\u003c/p>\n\u003cp> \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>2:55 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Terminal closure\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003ca href=\"http://www.vtnocal.com/default.asp?SiteID=TTI_OAK\">TTI’s announcement\u003c/a> that its Oakland terminal was unable to open for business today.\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Due to protesters who have congregated in front of the terminal’s main gate TTI will be unable to open for business today. We will resume operations tomorrow at the normal time.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>2:05 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Labor union support — or not\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Whether or not the affected labor unions support today’s action is a big topic of debate. On one side of the issue: An \u003ca href=\"http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/\">Open Letter from America’s Port Truck Drivers on Occupy the Ports\u003c/a>, signed by three port drivers and two other truckers:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>We are the front-line workers who haul container rigs full of imported and exported goods to and from the docks and warehouses every day.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have been elected by committees of our co-workers at the Ports of Los Angeles, Long Beach, Oakland, Seattle, Tacoma, New York and New Jersey to tell our collective story. We have accepted the honor to speak up for our brothers and sisters about our working conditions despite the risk of retaliation we face. One of us is a mother, the rest of us fathers. Between the five of us we have 11children and one more baby on the way. We have a combined 46 years of experience driving cargo from our shores for America’s stores.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We are inspired that a non-violent democratic movement that insists on basic economic fairness is capturing the hearts and minds of so many working people. Thank you “99 Percenters” for hearing our call for justice. We are humbled and overwhelmed by recent attention. Normally we are invisible.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Today’s demonstrations will impact us. While we cannot officially speak for every worker who shares our occupation, we can use this opportunity to reveal what it’s like to walk a day in our shoes for the 110,000 of us in America whose job it is to be a port truck driver. It may be tempting for media to ask questions about whether we support a shutdown, but there are no easy answers. Instead, we ask you, are you willing to listen and learn why a one-word response is impossible? \u003ca href=\"http://cleanandsafeports.org/blog/2011/12/12/an-open-letter-from-america%E2%80%99s-port-truck-drivers-on-occupy-the-ports/\">Full letter\u003c/a>\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>The letter goes on to describe poor working conditions and a loss of labor rights in the trucking industry.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Representing a different view: From Chronicle columnist Andrew S. Ross this weekend, \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/08/BUTP1M8VTI.DTL\">Union not keen on new Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(T)he folks [protesters] purport to be in solidarity with don’t seem hot on the idea to “effectively shut down the hubs of commerce” at all.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“Any actions organized by outside groups, including the proposed Dec. 12 shutdown of various terminals on the West Coast, have not been vetted by our union’s democratically led process,” the International Longshore and Warehouse Union said. “Any decisions made by groups outside of the union’s democratic process do not hold water, regardless of the intent.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The Occupy movements that make a fetish of applying direct democracy and near absolute consensus to its own decision making might want to take note of that.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Richard Mead, president of ILWU Local 10, which represents dockworkers at the Port of Oakland, said, “Our position is in the international’s press release. We’re not facilitating (Occupy Oakland’s strike call) in any way. We just want that clear.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Jeff Smith, president of ILWU Local 8 in Portland, Ore., went further, telling the Portland Tribune his union won’t honor picket lines. “This is a third-party strike. We have to go to work,” he said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>A couple of weeks ago, KQED’s Mina Kim spoke to Occupy Oakland’s Barucha Peller, who described herself as a member of the Coordinated West Coast Port Blockade Assembly. Peller talks about the Occupy movement’s reasons for focusing on the port. The conversation speaks to the question and perhaps some of the contradictions inherent in an outside group taking on an issue specific to organized labor. Edited transcript:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What is the port action about? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s about shutting down Wall Street on the waterfront. Shutting down Goldman Sachs, which owns a part of the SSA terminal, and EGT, a multiational grain exporter rupturing \u003ca href=\"http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/21/us-longshoremen-arrests-idUSTRE78K7TC20110921\">longshoremen jurisdiction\u003c/a> in Longview, Washington.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve identified the fact that a the 1% makes a great deal of its profit on the ports and on the backs of exploited labor.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Have you been working with longshoremen? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’ve been working with rank-and-file longshoremen. Legally, no union can sanction a strike. There are no-strike clauses. But we’re not asking for a strike, we’re asking for a blockade like on Nov 2.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Historically, since the anti-apartheid movement, people will go down and create community pickets and shut down the ports. These ports are public, anyone can go down there and protest. We know that the longshoremen rank and file largely support the aims of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>As well, this west coast coordinated port blockade is in solidarity with the longshoremen’s struggle against EGT in Longview Washington, which is ruptuing their jurisdition and is a direct threat to the survival of the ILWU. While the ILWU international may not be able to officially say anything about the port blockade, this is a large number of people taking on the issues that we all have with the 1%. EGT is not only a longshoreman issue, but they have economically plundered people from Argentina to Brazil and all around the world… And of course, Goldman Sachs owns a large part of the SSA terminal, and we all know what Goldman Sachs has done to a large part of our communities.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How would you respond to people who say that shutting down the port would hurt members of the 99% like truckers and other workers who need the shift? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s the same thing as in the general strike, where the right wing tried to accuse occupy Oakland of hurting small businesses. But we all have to make a sacrifice here, to strike back against the 1% and take our lives back from the 1%. This is what this movement is all about.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Did anyone from the Longview union ask you guys to shut down the port in solidarity with their fight? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>No. The occupation movement doesn’t need to take marching orders from anyone. It’s a mass of people self-organizing to get their material needs met and to strike back against he 1%. Of course we’ve been aware of the issue in Longview and applauding the resistance by the longshoremen up in Longview for resisting EGT, but like I said, EGT and other companies operating up there are a concern of everyone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Nobody from the longshoremen has asked the Occupy movement to do anytning.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Are you worried about support from the union’s rank and file, or do you think you definitely have their support? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The rank and file traditionally will honor community picket lines around social justice issues. I think the longshoremen are not unaware of the aims of the Occupy movement and a lot of those aims speak to them as well. Rank and file are also part of the Occupy movement, not separate. Across the board, rank and file union members as well as non-unionized workers, make up a large part of the Occupy movement.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Any plans to coordinate more with the ILWU?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It’s a very sad thing what’s happened to the unions in the U.S. because of no-strike clauses and different legal ramifications. It’s sad that unions have to distance themselves from things like this for fear of being sued.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Nobody can speak for the leadership of the ILWU. But working class people understand that EGT and Goldman Sachs are Wall Street on the waterfront, and it’s important to shut down Wall Street because of the way these big companies have plundered our lives.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003cbr>\n\u003cem>1 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Workers sent home\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>From \u003ca href=\"http://sg.news.yahoo.com/protesters-halt-operations-western-ports-191912986.html\">AP\u003c/a>:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>In Oakland, shipping companies and the longshoremen’s union agreed to send home about 150 workers, essentially halting operations at two terminals. In Portland, authorities shuttered two terminals after arresting two people who were carrying weapons.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>12:30 p.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Quan presser\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The press conference by Jean Quan and other Oakland officials was short and not particularly informative. Quan thanked police and protesters for keeping things peaceful. She asked the protesters to “respect the rights of the 99%” who are trying to work.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Quan also said the Port of Oakland is unique because it’s the “only port in the country” that exports more than imports. She said it’s particularly critical for agricultural shipments, and that 800,000 jobs across the country are linked to port shipments.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A reporter asked whether Quan has had a change of heart about actions against the port, as her husband had been out with protesters last month, during the general strike, when the port was shut down for a few hours. Quan said she has never supported any shutdown of the port, and that her husband was a “community monitor” during the first action.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Interim Police Chief Howard Jordan said there have been reports of violence or injury.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A port official said merely that there have been “impacts” at the terminals, mostly “backups” in terms of the truck traffic. He said he didn’t know if reports from protesters that “no ships were unloaded today” were true or not.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have calls out to the ILWU and the operator of one of the terminals, TTI, regarding the claim by protesters that the union has sent some workers home.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>12:15 p.m.\u003c/em> Live now from KGO, a \u003ca href=\"http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/livenow?id=8464068#&cmp=twi-kgo-livenow-8464068\">\u003cstrong>news conference regarding the Port of Oakland situation\u003c/strong>\u003c/a>. Mayor Jean Quan, City Administerator Deanna Santana, Chief of Police Howard Jordan, and port officials will speak.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>11:53 a.m.\u003c/em> \u003ca href=\"http://storify.com/kqednews/photos-dec-12-occupy-protests-at-port-of-oakland\">\u003cstrong>Photographic recap\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> put together by KQED’s Ian Hill.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>11:15 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Protesters Declare Victory\u003c/strong>\u003cem>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>KQED reporters Caitlin Esch and Andrew Stelzer report that Occupy protesters are leaving the Port of Oakland and declaring their efforts a success. The protesters blocked two terminals that were expecting shipments today. Drivers are starting to turn around their trucks and protesters are making their way back to Oakland. It is unclear whether protesters and workers will report for the Port’s second shift, which begins at 7:00 p.m. However, \u003ca href=\"http://www.hanjin.com/en/terminal/oakland.jsp\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Hanjin\u003c/a>, the shipping company that operates out of the blocked terminals has posted this notice \u003ca href=\"http://www.vtnocal.com/default.asp?SiteID=TTI_OAK\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"> online\u003c/a>: “Due to protesters who have congregated in front of the terminal’s main gate TTI will be unable to open for business today. We will resume operations tomorrow at the normal time.”\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>9:45 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Former Quan Advisor at Port Protest\u003c/strong>\u003cem>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(Bay City News) – Oakland attorney Dan Siegel, Mayor Jean Quan’s former legal adviser, was among those participating in the march to the port this morning. Siegel resigned as Quan’s unpaid legal adviser on Nov. 14, the morning that police raided the Occupy Oakland encampment outside City Hall. He was leaving this morning’s protest at about 7:20 a.m., heading to a client’s court hearing.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>9:40 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Truckers Left Waiting\u003c/strong>\u003cem>\u003cbr>\n\u003c/em>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(Bay City News) – As of 9 a.m., hundreds of protesters had blocked off the entrance to Berths 30-32, and Alamed\u003cbr>\na County sheriff’s deputies were keeping an eye on hundreds more who had gathered at the entrance to Berths 55-56.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Dozens of trucks were lined up outside both entrances as drivers\u003cbr>\nwaited to get into the port. One truck driver, who declined to give his name, said he had come from Santa Rosa and had been waiting since 5 a.m. He said he anticipates that the port will be closed all day and is awaiting instructions on what to do with his cargo.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Protester Shake Anderson, who said he has been involved in the\u003cbr>\nOccupy Oakland movement since the beginning, said the demonstrators’ strategy is to keep a large crowd at the port to make it difficult for police to makearrests.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“It’s all about numbers,” he said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>9:11 a.m. \u003c/em>\u003cstrong>Trucker: ‘They Should Protest at the White House, Not Where I Am Trying to Make a Living’\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>8:45 a.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Report: Three Ports Blocked\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Caitlin Esch, who is at the port now, says at least three gates at the port are effectively blocked, with nothing moving in or out as protesters clog up the entrances. Trucks are lined up, some trying to drop off, some trying to pick up.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“A lot of the truckers came in from far away — Nevada, Denver, Kansas, and so they’re not leaving until they complete their task,” Esch says. The truckers say they’re going to be living in their trucks until they can complete their assignments. One trucker whom Esch talked to was trying to drop off beef from Denver; he was extremely angry.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>An Occupy Oakland organizer said the group would try to have at least 100 people marching in front of each entrance, but the three that Caitlin Esch has observed so far have had more than that number.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cem>8:06 a.m.\u003c/em> \u003cstrong>Protestor’s Live Stream\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Live video stream from Spencer Mills (aka \u003ca href=\"http://twitter.com/oakfosho\">OakFoSho\u003c/a> on Twitter), who has been live-streaming Occupy Oakland protests:\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align: center\">\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" style=\"border: 0px none transparent\" src=\"http://www.ustream.tv/embed/9636787\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" width=\"480\" height=\"296\">\u003c/iframe>\u003c/div>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong> \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Occupy Movement Tries to Shut Down West Coast Ports\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>(AP) OAKLAND, Calif. — Anti-Wall Street protesters along the West Coast joined an effort Monday to blockade some of the nation’s busiest docks, with the idea that if they cut off the ports, they cut into corporate profits.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The protesters are targeting the locations because they believe American ports have become “economic engines for the elite.” They are most upset by two West Coast companies — giant West Coast port operator SSA Marine and grain exporter EGT — that they believe epitomize the big corporations that make up the “1 percent.”\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Goldman Sachs owns a major stake in SSA Marine, and the bank has been a repeated target of Occupy protesters since the movement began. The two port companies have also engaged in high-profile clashes with union workers lately, and the Occupy protesters want to stand up for the workers.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Several hundred people began picketing at the Port of Oakland before dawn and blocked some trucks from going inside. Police are monitoring at the scene, but no major clashes have been reported so far. Occupy protesters successfully shut down the port in November.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In Southern California, as many as 400 demonstrators gathered in a park and planned to march on the Port of Long Beach. Occupy protesters said they plan to head to a dock facility owned by SSA Marine.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>About 300 people gathered at Kelly Point Park in Portland, Ore., and Kari Koch, organizer with Shut Down the Ports Working Group of Occupy Portland, said she expected hundreds more to picket the nearby terminal. Police arrested three people and seized a gun and sword from people who said they were on the way to the demonstration.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Occupy groups also planned blockades in Seattle, Tacoma, Wash., and Vancouver, British Columbia.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The protests being billed as action against “Wall Street on the waterfront” are perhaps the Occupy movement’s most dramatic gesture since police raids sent most remaining camps scattering last month. Demonstrators began forming those camps around the country about two months ago to protest what they call corporate greed and economic inequality.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“We will not stand for corporate profits at the expense of working people, we will not stand for attacks on workers, and we will not allow our schools to be closed, social services slashed, and families to be impoverished by your greed!” Koch said Monday in statement.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Related:\u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://westcoastportshutdown.org/sites/default/files/portmap.pdf\">Map of the Port of Oakland\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.occupyoakland.org/\">Occupy Oakland\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://www.occupytheports.com/\">Occupy the Ports web site\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/49649/occupy-port-protest-live-tweets-from-reporters",
"authors": [
"237"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_19906",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_18",
"news_2083",
"news_1963",
"news_2140",
"news_5703"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_49093": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_49093",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "49093",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1323300345000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1323300345,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "As the High-Speed Rail Debate Rages On, Stanford Historian Becomes Big Critic",
"title": "As the High-Speed Rail Debate Rages On, Stanford Historian Becomes Big Critic",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_49259\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 288px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/high-speed-rail.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/high-speed-rail.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"high-speed-rail\" width=\"288\" height=\"162\" class=\"size-full wp-image-49259\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: California High-Speed Rail Authority\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>From AP yesterday: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood strongly defended the federal government's nearly $4 billion investment in high-speed rail in California, even as growing expenses and a longer timeline for completion have raised doubts in Congress.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>During a congressional hearing Tuesday, LaHood acknowledged that the project will be expensive, with current estimates putting the cost at nearly $100 billion over 20 years. Still, LaHood called the project essential.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>``We won't be dissuaded by the naysayers and the critics,'' LaHood said.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Speaking of naysayers and critics, you may have to include the 59 percent of California voters who just \u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/california-high-speed-rail/ci_19481327\">told the Field Poll they'd now reject the nearly $10 billion high-speed rail bond package\u003c/a> approved in 2008. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"If we're going to run our government by Field Poll, then maybe we ought to just dismantle the legislature and run everything up the ballot any time we do anything,\" Jim Earp, the chair of the bond measure's campaign in 2008, told KQED's John Myers. \"We can either throw [all the money away] and do nothing, or do what we did back in the depression, and build something like the Golden Gate Bridge or the San Francisco Bay Bridge or Shasta Dam.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Still, there are a lot of people who think the high-speed rail project is not only figuratively, but \u003ca href=\"http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/12/first-leg-of-california-high-speed-rail-project-chosen-critics-say-its-a-train-to-nowhere.html\">literally\u003c/a> something that's going nowhere fast. Adding fuel to their fire are a pair of reports critical of the project from the Legislative Analyst's Office, \u003ca href=\"http://www.lao.ca.gov/handouts/transportation/2011/HSRA_Business_Funding_plan_11_29_11.pdf\">most recently\u003c/a> on November 29.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Another perhaps less-likely HSR pessimist is \u003cstrong>Richard White, the Pulitzer-Prize-nominated Margaret Byrne Professor of American History at Stanford\u003c/strong>, whose specialty is the American West and whose current book is \u003cem>Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America\u003c/em>. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>White has become a thorn in the side of high-speed rail proponents for his vocal criticisms of the project, two of which you can read \u003ca href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/opinion/24white.html\">here\u003c/a> and \u003ca href=\"http://zocalopublicsquare.org/thepublicsquare/2011/09/19/why-not-blow-9-billion-on-a-cool-train/read/nexus/\">here\u003c/a>. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>KQED's Amy Standen interviewed White in November to find out just why he's so down on high-speed rail. Here's an edited transcript of the interview: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What's your take on high-speed rail?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It will not die, it's impossible to kill it. The state is going to lose money but construction firms are going to make a great deal of money, land developers around these stations if they ever complete them are going to make money. The governor stands to gain real political capital if they can spend 2 billion in federal dollars to improve employment -- the state needs jobs. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But it would be better to dig a very big hole and fill it up again because that won't cost you anything in the future. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The long-term danger is that you're going to create a white elephant in the San Joaquin Valley, which is essentially a line we have no need for and in fact there's no funding currently to put trains on it. It's never going to be able to sustain itself and the state is going to have to pour good money after bad. The plan now is to make it an Amtrak line, not high-speed rail. To spend $2 billion to do that is frankly ridiculous. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Do you think it's just the wrong time to build a high-speed rail system or is it the wrong thing period?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I have no objection to high-speed rail routes. You can make a good case for them between Boston and DC. The problem with this one is California is a state that is failing to fund its university system and failing to fund K-12 education. I was in LA last weekend, with infrastructure breaking down right and left. So to propose spending $100 billion on this is frankly ridiculous. Sometime in the future, if you can afford to fund it and make a good public case for doing so, I wouldn’t necessarily oppose it. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Proponents say people like you are ignoring the cost of not building the system, because we have to accommodate projected population growth. \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>What will high-speed rail do? It's not going to take pressure off the roads that are most congested. This is a proposal to shuttle people up and down the San Joaquin Valley, between SF and LA, with some stops in between. They've left out Sacramento and San Diego already.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And I don't think it's going to be able to compete with airline routes. We have fairly efficient airline transportation between the Bay Area and Los Angeles. I don't see really what good this is going to do. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>But we can't expand Bay Area airports, and flights are often delayed. Those problems aren't going to go away.\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You don’t think there will be delays on train routes? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>They're talking 30 years from now to complete it. So this will not do us any good in the short or medium term. Then you have to maintain it. The proponents act like if you build something incrementally you will not have to continue to pour money into it. But you have to make sure the rails don't deteriorate, and that the beds don't deteriorate, that storms don’t damage it. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You can't afford to build major infrastructure projects and just have them sit there and deteriorate until you're ready to use them. It's much cheaper to build them when you use them. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>So what would the right time look like?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>When Californians are ready to get onto trains. Which they're not. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It should be built after you take care of the low-hanging fruit. Why not regional transports around SF and LA, projects that will get people off the freeways where they're the most crowded? I-5 is not pleasant, but I wouldn't say that it is our major problem in California transportation and that's all this is going to fix. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Also, this does nothing about trucks. What railways have been good for is freight. That's what we should be getting off the road. I don’t see passengers as the real problem. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>But how can you expect people to want to ride trains if there aren't any trains to ride? Shouldn't California provide an environmentally responsible infrastructure, then encourage people to use it?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Anything you paint green in California is going to get you to support it. Many of my colleagues are shocked I'm against high-speed rail. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But the University of Berkeley looked at what happens to the Obama proposal to build high-speed rail across the U.S., and their analysis indicates a one-percent carbon savings. We couldn’t spend that money more effectively to reduce carbon? What you're falling for is something that looks flashy and people in France and Japan like it. But that's not the best bang for the buck to get serious about fighting global warming. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What do you think is the difference between America as opposed to Japan and France, where high-speed rail has been successful? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>When you take a high-speed rail train in France, from Paris to Lyon, you've got an infrastructure of public transportation that gets you to the rail station on time, and when you get off you can simply get on public transportation after. The same goes for Kyoto and Tokyo.\u003cbr>\nThat's not true of SF and LA. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We are building a high-speed rail network without the public transportation at either end of it. You need that because after the high-speed rail ride, people will have to get back in the car and drive a great deal. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The French and Japanese governments subsidize the fares. We have under Prop 1A agreed not to subsidize fares. Those governments also regulate their rail very heavily. We do not have such a great record of giving subsidies and getting public benefits back. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How did you go from history professor to high-speed rail critic? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I reacted to the parallel that's strong between high-speed rail and the transcontinental railroads. Those railroads were about 30 years premature; they did not make money and the US government had to sue the Central Pacific and Union Pacific in the 1890s to get the money loaned to them back. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In this case there's seemingly a bar to that happening – California high-speed rail has written into it that there will be no subsidies.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But let's imagine we have this thing built and no private capital is coming in. What prevents the state from going back to the legislature to say \"we need a subsidy to attract private capital?\" It will do what all these subsidies do –- guarantee private investors that there will be no risk for their investment. The public will get the risk; the private investors will get the benefit. And I can't imagine how this will attract private capital without going back to the legislature and guaranteeing the subsidy we promised we wouldn't. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>What drew me out of history is listening to President Obama and other figures justifying this project as a parallel to the transcontinental railroads. I realized they were right -– this was a parallel, and why would we want to make that mistake again? That's what made me write the first op-ed.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>In California we seem to have this idea that we can take on huge projects, that we're almost our own country. Is that changing? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Well, look at the big infrastructure projects that have worked in California. The interstate highway system: They had a dedicated revenue source to pay for that, plus a gas tax. The dams have subsidized major agricultural interests -- in a very unfair way, I think -- but at the same time, they built in a revenue source to pay for it, because dams produce power.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>High-speed rail says it will have a revenue source with the passengers paying the fare, but that's laughable. I don't think anyone in their right mind thinks fares are going to pay for this. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Once you exhaust the federal money and the rest of this has to be paid for by bonds, you will pay huge interest. We only have a small part of the cost funded so far. They're making up a world in which the federal government will give us more money and the counties and cities will contribute money and then private investment will come in at low interest and absorb the risk. But we'll absorb the risk; they'll take the profit, leaving us with the debt. This is a recipe for catastrophe. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Proponents would say you're making the perfect the enemy of the good.\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I'm making the good be the enemy of the impossible. If they could demonstrate that we need these lines where we're going to build them and there was any hope of paying for them I'd cut them some slack. But they've oversold this line so many times I think any California in their right mind would be extremely skeptical of anything the high-speed rail commission says. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>You say there's no good public transportation in California, even in a city like San Francisco. Explain. \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The secret to a good public transportation system is you don't have a schedule, like in NY and Chicago. You just show up and you know that within 10 or 15 minutes something will come along. When you need a schedule and you miss it and you have to wait 45 minutes or so that's not a real transportation system. In the Peninsula, bus service is for poor people, because they're the only ones who are desperate enough to wait an hour for the buses to come along. It would be a joke to try to use public transportation on the Peninsula. We should be creating a structure where these things work.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>If you want to read a refutation of some of these arguments, take a look at this \u003ca href=\"http://www.cahsrblog.com/2011/09/richard-white-doubles-down-on-his-flawed-attack-on-hsr/\">California High Speed Rail blog post\u003c/a>, by Robert Cruickshank. Cruickshank says that an \u003ca href=\"http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/assets/0/79/205/d04127b9-4b6e-4606-8d2a-b5806c959c4d.pdf\">independent peer review\u003c/a> found that contrary to White's assertion, HSR ridership projections are actually sound.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>On some of the other issues Professor White raises, Cruickshank writes:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>[White] says that the willingness of private investors to step up was overestimated, but that misreads what is going on. The private sector has shown a great deal of interest in the system. They have been consistent in saying that they will not yet step up until there is a significant state and federal contribution.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>White argues that the federal government won’t step up, even though Barack Obama has shown consistent support for federal funding, as have Democrats in Congress, and despite polls showing Democrats are likely to retake the House.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>White claims that the system will never cover its costs, even though virtually every other HSR system in the world does so, including the Acela.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Amy Standen also talked to \u003cstrong>Mike Rossi, chair of the California High Speed Rail Authority\u003c/strong>. Rossi said a lot of the criticism being levied by op-ed writers is based on a shallow reading of the issues and incorrect numbers. Edited transcript of Rossi addressing some other issues below:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong> The state is practically crippled under its financial strain right now. We've tripled tuition across the UC system. We're laying off teachers and cops. Is this the wrong time to take on something like this?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The legislature and the governor and in some cases the body politic will have to make their decision as to what they're going to do. I'm not suggesting that high-speed rail is more important than tuition at the University of California. That's not my role.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I'm putting forth, with my other board members, a realistic business plan so that people now can make whatever judgement they make. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have every assumption, every piece of data that drives this plan on record open to analysis to anyone, and I'm open to standing and having those conversations because if we're wrong better to find it out now rather than later. But we want to have that conversation with people who are as transparent as we are in what we're saying and doing. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What are the consequences of \u003cem>not\u003c/em> building high-speed rail?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>My view is that if we don’t build high-speed rail, and instead build roads -- aside from the 3.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide that we'll discharge in the air, besides the 148 million hours of standing in traffic and driving more pollution -- trains last for a hundred years and they cover their operating maintenance and capital refreshment. I don't know any road that does that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>The current business plan relies pretty heavily on private investment, which some critics say is unrealistic. What's your response?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I will tell you right now, if people can sell future revenues of Elton john concerts, we can sell future revenues of high-speed rail, and at a better discount. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>We built the transcontinental railroad in four years.This project is likely to take decades, in part because of lawsuits from communities along the proposed route. Do you ever start to wonder whether we are past the age where we can build big projects?\u003cbr>\n\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Ever watch \u003cem>The Maltese Falcon\u003c/em>? At the very end of his life, Humphrey Bogart said the last line in the movie was an ad-lib. He said, in referring to the jewel-encrusted statue, \"it's the stuff that dreams are made of.\" Well let me tell you something, California is the stuff that dreams are made of. This state is still the most innovative economy in the world and the state that still gets the most foreign investment. We Californians can do big things, period. \u003c/p>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "49093 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=49093",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/07/as-the-high-speed-rail-debate-rages-on-stanford-historian-becomes-a-critic/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 2690,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 65
},
"modified": 1323303705,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "From AP yesterday: Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood strongly defended the federal government's nearly $4 billion investment in high-speed rail in California, even as growing expenses and a longer timeline for completion have raised doubts in Congress. During a congressional hearing Tuesday, LaHood acknowledged that the project will be expensive, with current estimates putting the cost",
"title": "As the High-Speed Rail Debate Rages On, Stanford Historian Becomes Big Critic | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "As the High-Speed Rail Debate Rages On, Stanford Historian Becomes Big Critic",
"datePublished": "2011-12-07T15:25:45-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-12-07T16:21:45-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "as-the-high-speed-rail-debate-rages-on-stanford-historian-becomes-a-critic",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/49093/as-the-high-speed-rail-debate-rages-on-stanford-historian-becomes-a-critic",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_49259\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 288px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/high-speed-rail.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/12/high-speed-rail.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"high-speed-rail\" width=\"288\" height=\"162\" class=\"size-full wp-image-49259\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: California High-Speed Rail Authority\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>From AP yesterday: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood strongly defended the federal government's nearly $4 billion investment in high-speed rail in California, even as growing expenses and a longer timeline for completion have raised doubts in Congress.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>During a congressional hearing Tuesday, LaHood acknowledged that the project will be expensive, with current estimates putting the cost at nearly $100 billion over 20 years. Still, LaHood called the project essential.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>``We won't be dissuaded by the naysayers and the critics,'' LaHood said.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Speaking of naysayers and critics, you may have to include the 59 percent of California voters who just \u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/california-high-speed-rail/ci_19481327\">told the Field Poll they'd now reject the nearly $10 billion high-speed rail bond package\u003c/a> approved in 2008. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\"If we're going to run our government by Field Poll, then maybe we ought to just dismantle the legislature and run everything up the ballot any time we do anything,\" Jim Earp, the chair of the bond measure's campaign in 2008, told KQED's John Myers. \"We can either throw [all the money away] and do nothing, or do what we did back in the depression, and build something like the Golden Gate Bridge or the San Francisco Bay Bridge or Shasta Dam.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Still, there are a lot of people who think the high-speed rail project is not only figuratively, but \u003ca href=\"http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/lanow/2010/12/first-leg-of-california-high-speed-rail-project-chosen-critics-say-its-a-train-to-nowhere.html\">literally\u003c/a> something that's going nowhere fast. Adding fuel to their fire are a pair of reports critical of the project from the Legislative Analyst's Office, \u003ca href=\"http://www.lao.ca.gov/handouts/transportation/2011/HSRA_Business_Funding_plan_11_29_11.pdf\">most recently\u003c/a> on November 29.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Another perhaps less-likely HSR pessimist is \u003cstrong>Richard White, the Pulitzer-Prize-nominated Margaret Byrne Professor of American History at Stanford\u003c/strong>, whose specialty is the American West and whose current book is \u003cem>Railroaded: The Transcontinentals and the Making of Modern America\u003c/em>. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>White has become a thorn in the side of high-speed rail proponents for his vocal criticisms of the project, two of which you can read \u003ca href=\"http://www.nytimes.com/2011/04/24/opinion/24white.html\">here\u003c/a> and \u003ca href=\"http://zocalopublicsquare.org/thepublicsquare/2011/09/19/why-not-blow-9-billion-on-a-cool-train/read/nexus/\">here\u003c/a>. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>KQED's Amy Standen interviewed White in November to find out just why he's so down on high-speed rail. Here's an edited transcript of the interview: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What's your take on high-speed rail?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It will not die, it's impossible to kill it. The state is going to lose money but construction firms are going to make a great deal of money, land developers around these stations if they ever complete them are going to make money. The governor stands to gain real political capital if they can spend 2 billion in federal dollars to improve employment -- the state needs jobs. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But it would be better to dig a very big hole and fill it up again because that won't cost you anything in the future. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The long-term danger is that you're going to create a white elephant in the San Joaquin Valley, which is essentially a line we have no need for and in fact there's no funding currently to put trains on it. It's never going to be able to sustain itself and the state is going to have to pour good money after bad. The plan now is to make it an Amtrak line, not high-speed rail. To spend $2 billion to do that is frankly ridiculous. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Do you think it's just the wrong time to build a high-speed rail system or is it the wrong thing period?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I have no objection to high-speed rail routes. You can make a good case for them between Boston and DC. The problem with this one is California is a state that is failing to fund its university system and failing to fund K-12 education. I was in LA last weekend, with infrastructure breaking down right and left. So to propose spending $100 billion on this is frankly ridiculous. Sometime in the future, if you can afford to fund it and make a good public case for doing so, I wouldn’t necessarily oppose it. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Proponents say people like you are ignoring the cost of not building the system, because we have to accommodate projected population growth. \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>What will high-speed rail do? It's not going to take pressure off the roads that are most congested. This is a proposal to shuttle people up and down the San Joaquin Valley, between SF and LA, with some stops in between. They've left out Sacramento and San Diego already.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>And I don't think it's going to be able to compete with airline routes. We have fairly efficient airline transportation between the Bay Area and Los Angeles. I don't see really what good this is going to do. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>But we can't expand Bay Area airports, and flights are often delayed. Those problems aren't going to go away.\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You don’t think there will be delays on train routes? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>They're talking 30 years from now to complete it. So this will not do us any good in the short or medium term. Then you have to maintain it. The proponents act like if you build something incrementally you will not have to continue to pour money into it. But you have to make sure the rails don't deteriorate, and that the beds don't deteriorate, that storms don’t damage it. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You can't afford to build major infrastructure projects and just have them sit there and deteriorate until you're ready to use them. It's much cheaper to build them when you use them. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>So what would the right time look like?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>When Californians are ready to get onto trains. Which they're not. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It should be built after you take care of the low-hanging fruit. Why not regional transports around SF and LA, projects that will get people off the freeways where they're the most crowded? I-5 is not pleasant, but I wouldn't say that it is our major problem in California transportation and that's all this is going to fix. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Also, this does nothing about trucks. What railways have been good for is freight. That's what we should be getting off the road. I don’t see passengers as the real problem. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>But how can you expect people to want to ride trains if there aren't any trains to ride? Shouldn't California provide an environmentally responsible infrastructure, then encourage people to use it?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Anything you paint green in California is going to get you to support it. Many of my colleagues are shocked I'm against high-speed rail. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But the University of Berkeley looked at what happens to the Obama proposal to build high-speed rail across the U.S., and their analysis indicates a one-percent carbon savings. We couldn’t spend that money more effectively to reduce carbon? What you're falling for is something that looks flashy and people in France and Japan like it. But that's not the best bang for the buck to get serious about fighting global warming. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What do you think is the difference between America as opposed to Japan and France, where high-speed rail has been successful? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>When you take a high-speed rail train in France, from Paris to Lyon, you've got an infrastructure of public transportation that gets you to the rail station on time, and when you get off you can simply get on public transportation after. The same goes for Kyoto and Tokyo.\u003cbr>\nThat's not true of SF and LA. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We are building a high-speed rail network without the public transportation at either end of it. You need that because after the high-speed rail ride, people will have to get back in the car and drive a great deal. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The French and Japanese governments subsidize the fares. We have under Prop 1A agreed not to subsidize fares. Those governments also regulate their rail very heavily. We do not have such a great record of giving subsidies and getting public benefits back. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>How did you go from history professor to high-speed rail critic? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I reacted to the parallel that's strong between high-speed rail and the transcontinental railroads. Those railroads were about 30 years premature; they did not make money and the US government had to sue the Central Pacific and Union Pacific in the 1890s to get the money loaned to them back. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>In this case there's seemingly a bar to that happening – California high-speed rail has written into it that there will be no subsidies.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But let's imagine we have this thing built and no private capital is coming in. What prevents the state from going back to the legislature to say \"we need a subsidy to attract private capital?\" It will do what all these subsidies do –- guarantee private investors that there will be no risk for their investment. The public will get the risk; the private investors will get the benefit. And I can't imagine how this will attract private capital without going back to the legislature and guaranteeing the subsidy we promised we wouldn't. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>What drew me out of history is listening to President Obama and other figures justifying this project as a parallel to the transcontinental railroads. I realized they were right -– this was a parallel, and why would we want to make that mistake again? That's what made me write the first op-ed.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>In California we seem to have this idea that we can take on huge projects, that we're almost our own country. Is that changing? \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Well, look at the big infrastructure projects that have worked in California. The interstate highway system: They had a dedicated revenue source to pay for that, plus a gas tax. The dams have subsidized major agricultural interests -- in a very unfair way, I think -- but at the same time, they built in a revenue source to pay for it, because dams produce power.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>High-speed rail says it will have a revenue source with the passengers paying the fare, but that's laughable. I don't think anyone in their right mind thinks fares are going to pay for this. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Once you exhaust the federal money and the rest of this has to be paid for by bonds, you will pay huge interest. We only have a small part of the cost funded so far. They're making up a world in which the federal government will give us more money and the counties and cities will contribute money and then private investment will come in at low interest and absorb the risk. But we'll absorb the risk; they'll take the profit, leaving us with the debt. This is a recipe for catastrophe. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Proponents would say you're making the perfect the enemy of the good.\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I'm making the good be the enemy of the impossible. If they could demonstrate that we need these lines where we're going to build them and there was any hope of paying for them I'd cut them some slack. But they've oversold this line so many times I think any California in their right mind would be extremely skeptical of anything the high-speed rail commission says. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>You say there's no good public transportation in California, even in a city like San Francisco. Explain. \u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The secret to a good public transportation system is you don't have a schedule, like in NY and Chicago. You just show up and you know that within 10 or 15 minutes something will come along. When you need a schedule and you miss it and you have to wait 45 minutes or so that's not a real transportation system. In the Peninsula, bus service is for poor people, because they're the only ones who are desperate enough to wait an hour for the buses to come along. It would be a joke to try to use public transportation on the Peninsula. We should be creating a structure where these things work.\u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>If you want to read a refutation of some of these arguments, take a look at this \u003ca href=\"http://www.cahsrblog.com/2011/09/richard-white-doubles-down-on-his-flawed-attack-on-hsr/\">California High Speed Rail blog post\u003c/a>, by Robert Cruickshank. Cruickshank says that an \u003ca href=\"http://www.cahighspeedrail.ca.gov/assets/0/79/205/d04127b9-4b6e-4606-8d2a-b5806c959c4d.pdf\">independent peer review\u003c/a> found that contrary to White's assertion, HSR ridership projections are actually sound.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>On some of the other issues Professor White raises, Cruickshank writes:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>[White] says that the willingness of private investors to step up was overestimated, but that misreads what is going on. The private sector has shown a great deal of interest in the system. They have been consistent in saying that they will not yet step up until there is a significant state and federal contribution.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>White argues that the federal government won’t step up, even though Barack Obama has shown consistent support for federal funding, as have Democrats in Congress, and despite polls showing Democrats are likely to retake the House.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>White claims that the system will never cover its costs, even though virtually every other HSR system in the world does so, including the Acela.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Amy Standen also talked to \u003cstrong>Mike Rossi, chair of the California High Speed Rail Authority\u003c/strong>. Rossi said a lot of the criticism being levied by op-ed writers is based on a shallow reading of the issues and incorrect numbers. Edited transcript of Rossi addressing some other issues below:\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong> The state is practically crippled under its financial strain right now. We've tripled tuition across the UC system. We're laying off teachers and cops. Is this the wrong time to take on something like this?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The legislature and the governor and in some cases the body politic will have to make their decision as to what they're going to do. I'm not suggesting that high-speed rail is more important than tuition at the University of California. That's not my role.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I'm putting forth, with my other board members, a realistic business plan so that people now can make whatever judgement they make. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We have every assumption, every piece of data that drives this plan on record open to analysis to anyone, and I'm open to standing and having those conversations because if we're wrong better to find it out now rather than later. But we want to have that conversation with people who are as transparent as we are in what we're saying and doing. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What are the consequences of \u003cem>not\u003c/em> building high-speed rail?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>My view is that if we don’t build high-speed rail, and instead build roads -- aside from the 3.2 billion tons of carbon dioxide that we'll discharge in the air, besides the 148 million hours of standing in traffic and driving more pollution -- trains last for a hundred years and they cover their operating maintenance and capital refreshment. I don't know any road that does that. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>The current business plan relies pretty heavily on private investment, which some critics say is unrealistic. What's your response?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I will tell you right now, if people can sell future revenues of Elton john concerts, we can sell future revenues of high-speed rail, and at a better discount. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>We built the transcontinental railroad in four years.This project is likely to take decades, in part because of lawsuits from communities along the proposed route. Do you ever start to wonder whether we are past the age where we can build big projects?\u003cbr>\n\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Ever watch \u003cem>The Maltese Falcon\u003c/em>? At the very end of his life, Humphrey Bogart said the last line in the movie was an ad-lib. He said, in referring to the jewel-encrusted statue, \"it's the stuff that dreams are made of.\" Well let me tell you something, California is the stuff that dreams are made of. This state is still the most innovative economy in the world and the state that still gets the most foreign investment. We Californians can do big things, period. \u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/49093/as-the-high-speed-rail-debate-rages-on-stanford-historian-becomes-a-critic",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_18540",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_309",
"news_2127",
"news_178"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_48887": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_48887",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "48887",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1323102052000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1323102052,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "San Francisco-Bound Traffic Backed Up on Bay Bridge",
"title": "San Francisco-Bound Traffic Backed Up on Bay Bridge",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cp>(Bay City News) Traffic heading into San Francisco on the Bay Bridge is backed up this morning due to a four-vehicle crash involving an AC Transit bus and a Chevy Avalanche, according to the California Highway Patrol. The San Francisco Chronicle \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/05/BA811M8G51.DTL#ixzz1fg5Z5k2W\">reports\u003c/a> the bus was carrying 20 passengers. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The accident happened just after 6 a.m. and has blocked two lanes of westbound Interstate Highway 80 on the eastern span of the bridge.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Police and fire officials are on the scene, but it is unknown how long the two lanes of the bridge will be blocked, a CHP officer said. \u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://maps.google.com/maps?q=san+francisco+bay+bridge+traffic&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x80857ff6233f7735:0x21139edd71dd8d24,Bay+Bridge,+San+Francisco,+CA&gl=us&layer=t&ei=j-_cTqaQEsqtiAKE-az5CQ&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ8gEwAA\">Live Bay Bridge traffic from Google\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "48887 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=48887",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/12/05/san-francisco-bound-traffic-backed-up-on-bay-bridge/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 109,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 5
},
"modified": 1323102515,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "(Bay City News) Traffic heading into San Francisco on the Bay Bridge is backed up this morning due to a four-vehicle crash involving an AC Transit bus and a Chevy Avalanche, according to the California Highway Patrol. The San Francisco Chronicle reports the bus was carrying 20 passengers. The accident happened just after 6 a.m.",
"title": "San Francisco-Bound Traffic Backed Up on Bay Bridge | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "San Francisco-Bound Traffic Backed Up on Bay Bridge",
"datePublished": "2011-12-05T08:20:52-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-12-05T08:28:35-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "san-francisco-bound-traffic-backed-up-on-bay-bridge",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/48887/san-francisco-bound-traffic-backed-up-on-bay-bridge",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>(Bay City News) Traffic heading into San Francisco on the Bay Bridge is backed up this morning due to a four-vehicle crash involving an AC Transit bus and a Chevy Avalanche, according to the California Highway Patrol. The San Francisco Chronicle \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2011/12/05/BA811M8G51.DTL#ixzz1fg5Z5k2W\">reports\u003c/a> the bus was carrying 20 passengers. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The accident happened just after 6 a.m. and has blocked two lanes of westbound Interstate Highway 80 on the eastern span of the bridge.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Police and fire officials are on the scene, but it is unknown how long the two lanes of the bridge will be blocked, a CHP officer said. \u003c/p>\n\u003cul>\n\u003cli>\u003ca href=\"http://maps.google.com/maps?q=san+francisco+bay+bridge+traffic&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=0x80857ff6233f7735:0x21139edd71dd8d24,Bay+Bridge,+San+Francisco,+CA&gl=us&layer=t&ei=j-_cTqaQEsqtiAKE-az5CQ&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=title&resnum=1&ved=0CCgQ8gEwAA\">Live Bay Bridge traffic from Google\u003c/a>\u003c/li>\n\u003c/ul>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/48887/san-francisco-bound-traffic-backed-up-on-bay-bridge",
"authors": [
"237"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_231"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_48612": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_48612",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "48612",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1322612248000
]
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "caldecott-tunnel-fourth-bore-breakthrough",
"title": "Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Breakthrough",
"publishDate": 1322612248,
"format": "aside",
"headTitle": "Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Breakthrough | KQED",
"labelTerm": {
"term": 6944,
"site": "news"
},
"content": "\u003cp>It’s not quite connecting the transcontinental railroad, but for commuters who have sat in traffic for years at the Caldecott Tunnel, it’s definitely a milestone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The San Jose Mercury News is \u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/twitter/ci_19434660?source=rss&cid=dlvr.it\">reporting \u003c/a>that excavation gear in the fourth bore construction has hit the other side:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Caltrans contractors broke through the Orinda hillside on Tuesday afternoon, connecting the two sections of the tunnel being dug to create the fourth bore of the Caldecott Tunnel.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A giant excavating machine called a roadheader pierced through a wall about 2:45 p.m. deep inside the tunnel, Caltrans spokeswoman Ivy Morrision said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>The fourth bore is projected to open in late 2013.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n",
"blocks": [],
"excerpt": null,
"status": "publish",
"parent": 0,
"modified": 1721102452,
"stats": {
"hasAudio": false,
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"paragraphCount": 7,
"wordCount": 114
},
"headData": {
"title": "Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Breakthrough | KQED",
"description": "It’s not quite connecting the transcontinental railroad, but for commuters who have sat in traffic for years at the Caldecott Tunnel, it’s definitely a milestone. The San Jose Mercury News is reporting that excavation gear in the fourth bore construction has hit the other side: Caltrans contractors broke through the Orinda hillside on Tuesday afternoon,",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogDescription": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"twDescription": "",
"twImgId": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Caldecott Tunnel Fourth Bore Breakthrough",
"datePublished": "2011-11-29T16:17:28-08:00",
"dateModified": "2024-07-15T21:00:52-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"sticky": false,
"path": "/news/48612/caldecott-tunnel-fourth-bore-breakthrough",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>It’s not quite connecting the transcontinental railroad, but for commuters who have sat in traffic for years at the Caldecott Tunnel, it’s definitely a milestone.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The San Jose Mercury News is \u003ca href=\"http://www.mercurynews.com/twitter/ci_19434660?source=rss&cid=dlvr.it\">reporting \u003c/a>that excavation gear in the fourth bore construction has hit the other side:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Caltrans contractors broke through the Orinda hillside on Tuesday afternoon, connecting the two sections of the tunnel being dug to create the fourth bore of the Caldecott Tunnel.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>A giant excavating machine called a roadheader pierced through a wall about 2:45 p.m. deep inside the tunnel, Caltrans spokeswoman Ivy Morrision said.\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>The fourth bore is projected to open in late 2013.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/48612/caldecott-tunnel-fourth-bore-breakthrough",
"authors": [
"252"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_20517"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_47687": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_47687",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "47687",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1321639035000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1321639035,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "High-Speed Rail's Original Champions Now Have Doubts",
"title": "High-Speed Rail's Original Champions Now Have Doubts",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cp>If you were a reporter covering high speed rail in 2008, after voters passed Proposition 1A, two names would be at the top of your source list: Quentin Kopp and Mehdi Morshed. Both served on the High Speed Rail Authority, the body charged with overseeing the effort to build a bullet train from Anaheim to LA. Both had been championing high-speed rail for decades. \u003c/p>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47741\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 288px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/high-speed-rail1.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/high-speed-rail1.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"high-speed-rail\" width=\"288\" height=\"162\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47741\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: California High-Speed Rail Authority\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>But Kopp and Morshed sound decidedly less enthusiastic these days. They still believe high-speed rail is necessary for the state. They stand by the decision to build the initial leg of the system in the Central Valley -- a route critics have derided as the \"rail to nowhere.\" They say it's a critical piece of the line, and a good place to test the technology. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But they say the plan they envisioned – and that voters approved in 2008 – is not what's being described by the High Speed Rail Authority today. They're critical of the so-called \"blended approach\" that would force high-speed rail trains to share tracks with existing commuter services, like Caltrain, and, at least initially, require customers to make several transfers along the SF-LA route. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Officials with the High Speed Rail Authority say the \"goal\" is to have at least one train a day reach LA from San Francisco in under three hours. But given the transfers and the track-sharing, average travel times are likely to be significantly longer. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Kopp and Morshed say these concessions won't produce a system that can compete with airlines. And if passengers don't take to high-speed rail en masse, the system will falter.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I spoke to Kopp and Morshed separately, by phone. Both said they hadn't read the business plan, but had read recent news reports about it. For the sake of readability, I'm combining their answers here. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What's your objection to the \"blended plan,\" which integrates high-speed rail into existing services, like Metrolink and Caltrain?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kopp\u003c/strong>: Real high-speed rail, you get on in one place, you get off in another. Making people transfer from one train to another in my opinion is a sure recipe for discouraging ridership. That’s why I fought to have BART into SFO, not a mile and a half away, and that’s proved to be the most successful part of the entire BART system. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You have to be running, as we’ve always predicated, ten trains per hour, in the peak hours of the morning and afternoon to generate the revenue you need so you can function without a government subsidy. It’s certainly not the project which I had in mind and others had in mind. It’s a different kind of system. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There’s even a legal question as to whether this so-called blended system -- in other words, starting off with trains from San Francisco to San Jose at a top speed of 125 mph, or probably less than that if you’re using the same tracks Caltrain uses -- whether that can be legally done under the provisions of Prop 1A, which was passed by voters in 2008.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Morshed\u003c/strong>: We kept saying, over and over again: In order for high-speed rail to be successful – and this has been proven in Europe, in Japan, and, of course, China – you need it to be fast and frequent. And nonstop. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If they’re going to have only one train a day that’s three hours, you might as well forget it. If you can’t compete with airplanes, you’re going to be out of business. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>According to the plan, the initial route from Fresno to Bakersfield is going to generate positive cash flows, and also attract $11 billion in private investment, which will help get the rest of the system built. Is that realistic?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Morshed\u003c/strong>: Fresno to Bakersfield is the key connecting piece that you have to build in order to build the rest of it. You don't have any choice about it. But you have to recognize that there aren't that many people going between Bakersfield and Merced. That piece was never going to make any money. It just isn't logical. Who's going to ride it? And private investors aren't going to invest in anything that's not making money.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kopp\u003c/strong>: No way. No way. It was clear that that first leg was not for revenue service. It's for testing trains, obviously. For revenue, you’ve got to [expand the system] to LA or to San Francisco. I am skeptical about private investment until the very end of the completion of the entire first phase, from SF to Anaheim. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>So, what do you think is going to happen? Should the project be shelved?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kopp\u003c/strong>: Absolutely not. Human beings are creative. They'll come up with some other sources. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You have to take a long historical view. I-5 wasn’t built all at once. But, of course, the interstate highway system had a specific source of money, namely the federal gasoline tax. High-speed rail has got to get, if it can, a specific source of funding: federal or state. I don’t know how much regional sources can contribute. It’s gonna be a long haul. A much longer haul than I originally thought. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Morshed\u003c/strong>: I believe the same as I did three years ago or ten years ago, that given the growth of the state and our population, and the realities of our transportation needs, California has to build a high-speed network sooner or later. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I'm convinced it's going to be built. But in which way, I don't know. And with how many ups and downs, I don't know. I intentionally haven't tried to look at the details and second-guess people. Maybe they know something I didn't know. I hope they do. \u003c/p>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "47687 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=47687",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/18/high-speed-rails-original-champions-now-have-doubts/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 1011,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 22
},
"modified": 1321650531,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "If you were a reporter covering high speed rail in 2008, after voters passed Proposition 1A, two names would be at the top of your source list: Quentin Kopp and Mehdi Morshed. Both served on the High Speed Rail Authority, the body charged with overseeing the effort to build a bullet train from Anaheim to",
"title": "High-Speed Rail's Original Champions Now Have Doubts | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "High-Speed Rail's Original Champions Now Have Doubts",
"datePublished": "2011-11-18T09:57:15-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-11-18T13:08:51-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "high-speed-rails-original-champions-now-have-doubts",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/47687/high-speed-rails-original-champions-now-have-doubts",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cp>If you were a reporter covering high speed rail in 2008, after voters passed Proposition 1A, two names would be at the top of your source list: Quentin Kopp and Mehdi Morshed. Both served on the High Speed Rail Authority, the body charged with overseeing the effort to build a bullet train from Anaheim to LA. Both had been championing high-speed rail for decades. \u003c/p>\n\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47741\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 288px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/high-speed-rail1.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/high-speed-rail1.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"high-speed-rail\" width=\"288\" height=\"162\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47741\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Photo: California High-Speed Rail Authority\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>But Kopp and Morshed sound decidedly less enthusiastic these days. They still believe high-speed rail is necessary for the state. They stand by the decision to build the initial leg of the system in the Central Valley -- a route critics have derided as the \"rail to nowhere.\" They say it's a critical piece of the line, and a good place to test the technology. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But they say the plan they envisioned – and that voters approved in 2008 – is not what's being described by the High Speed Rail Authority today. They're critical of the so-called \"blended approach\" that would force high-speed rail trains to share tracks with existing commuter services, like Caltrain, and, at least initially, require customers to make several transfers along the SF-LA route. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Officials with the High Speed Rail Authority say the \"goal\" is to have at least one train a day reach LA from San Francisco in under three hours. But given the transfers and the track-sharing, average travel times are likely to be significantly longer. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Kopp and Morshed say these concessions won't produce a system that can compete with airlines. And if passengers don't take to high-speed rail en masse, the system will falter.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I spoke to Kopp and Morshed separately, by phone. Both said they hadn't read the business plan, but had read recent news reports about it. For the sake of readability, I'm combining their answers here. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>What's your objection to the \"blended plan,\" which integrates high-speed rail into existing services, like Metrolink and Caltrain?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kopp\u003c/strong>: Real high-speed rail, you get on in one place, you get off in another. Making people transfer from one train to another in my opinion is a sure recipe for discouraging ridership. That’s why I fought to have BART into SFO, not a mile and a half away, and that’s proved to be the most successful part of the entire BART system. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You have to be running, as we’ve always predicated, ten trains per hour, in the peak hours of the morning and afternoon to generate the revenue you need so you can function without a government subsidy. It’s certainly not the project which I had in mind and others had in mind. It’s a different kind of system. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There’s even a legal question as to whether this so-called blended system -- in other words, starting off with trains from San Francisco to San Jose at a top speed of 125 mph, or probably less than that if you’re using the same tracks Caltrain uses -- whether that can be legally done under the provisions of Prop 1A, which was passed by voters in 2008.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Morshed\u003c/strong>: We kept saying, over and over again: In order for high-speed rail to be successful – and this has been proven in Europe, in Japan, and, of course, China – you need it to be fast and frequent. And nonstop. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>If they’re going to have only one train a day that’s three hours, you might as well forget it. If you can’t compete with airplanes, you’re going to be out of business. \u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>According to the plan, the initial route from Fresno to Bakersfield is going to generate positive cash flows, and also attract $11 billion in private investment, which will help get the rest of the system built. Is that realistic?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Morshed\u003c/strong>: Fresno to Bakersfield is the key connecting piece that you have to build in order to build the rest of it. You don't have any choice about it. But you have to recognize that there aren't that many people going between Bakersfield and Merced. That piece was never going to make any money. It just isn't logical. Who's going to ride it? And private investors aren't going to invest in anything that's not making money.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kopp\u003c/strong>: No way. No way. It was clear that that first leg was not for revenue service. It's for testing trains, obviously. For revenue, you’ve got to [expand the system] to LA or to San Francisco. I am skeptical about private investment until the very end of the completion of the entire first phase, from SF to Anaheim. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>So, what do you think is going to happen? Should the project be shelved?\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Kopp\u003c/strong>: Absolutely not. Human beings are creative. They'll come up with some other sources. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You have to take a long historical view. I-5 wasn’t built all at once. But, of course, the interstate highway system had a specific source of money, namely the federal gasoline tax. High-speed rail has got to get, if it can, a specific source of funding: federal or state. I don’t know how much regional sources can contribute. It’s gonna be a long haul. A much longer haul than I originally thought. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Morshed\u003c/strong>: I believe the same as I did three years ago or ten years ago, that given the growth of the state and our population, and the realities of our transportation needs, California has to build a high-speed network sooner or later. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>I'm convinced it's going to be built. But in which way, I don't know. And with how many ups and downs, I don't know. I intentionally haven't tried to look at the details and second-guess people. Maybe they know something I didn't know. I hope they do. \u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/47687/high-speed-rails-original-champions-now-have-doubts",
"authors": [
"210"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_309"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_47610": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_47610",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "47610",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1321583394000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1321583394,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "Another Slowdown for High-Speed Rail?",
"title": "Another Slowdown for High-Speed Rail?",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47678\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/78027845.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/78027845-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Close-up of the front of a bullet train in the station in Zurich, Switzerland.\" title=\"swissbullet\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-47678\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Close-up of the front of a bullet train in the station in Zurich, Switzerland. (Photo: Thinkstock)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>On Thursday, Congress delivered \u003ca href=\"http://news.google.com/news/more?q=high-speed+rail&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=hQB&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=imvnsul&biw=1148&bih=669&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dlfKYOqEVr_gDJMmcUO9wHaBDCS2M&ei=yInFTuj_HuGqiALX1cjgBQ&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQqgIwAA\">another blow\u003c/a> to California’s embattled plan to build a bullet train from San Francisco to Anaheim. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>House and Senate negotiators agreed to kill President Obama’s high speed rail program, which would have funneled billions of dollars for high speed rail construction. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Obama’s plan would have provided $8 billion in funding in 2012, and then an additional $53 billion over the next six years.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>California is already poised to collect $3 billion in federal stimulus funds, which will help it build the first leg of the line -- the much-maligned “Rail to Nowhere,” from Fresno to Bakersfield. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But in order to complete the full system from San Francisco to Anaheim, rail officials are counting on an additional $55 billion of federal money, as well as private investment. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Asked how the news from Washington affects California’s plans, High Speed Rail Authority spokeswoman Rachel Wall said the project isn’t dependent on 2012 federal funding. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“Our plan assumes no federal funding before 2014,” said Wall. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Wall said the High Speed Rail Authority will continue to work with Congress to obtain federal grants or loans beginning in 2014. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“We’re looking to federal funding in the long term, but not the near term.”\u003c/p>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "47610 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=47610",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/17/another-slowdown-for-high-speed-rail/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 238,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 11
},
"modified": 1321588753,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "On Thursday, Congress delivered another blow to California’s embattled plan to build a bullet train from San Francisco to Anaheim. House and Senate negotiators agreed to kill President Obama’s high speed rail program, which would have funneled billions of dollars for high speed rail construction. Obama’s plan would have provided $8 billion in funding in",
"title": "Another Slowdown for High-Speed Rail? | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Another Slowdown for High-Speed Rail?",
"datePublished": "2011-11-17T18:29:54-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-11-17T19:59:13-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "another-slowdown-for-high-speed-rail",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/47610/another-slowdown-for-high-speed-rail",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47678\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 300px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/78027845.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/78027845-300x200.jpg\" alt=\"Close-up of the front of a bullet train in the station in Zurich, Switzerland.\" title=\"swissbullet\" width=\"300\" height=\"200\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-47678\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Close-up of the front of a bullet train in the station in Zurich, Switzerland. (Photo: Thinkstock)\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>On Thursday, Congress delivered \u003ca href=\"http://news.google.com/news/more?q=high-speed+rail&hl=en&client=firefox-a&hs=hQB&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&prmd=imvnsul&biw=1148&bih=669&um=1&ie=UTF-8&ncl=dlfKYOqEVr_gDJMmcUO9wHaBDCS2M&ei=yInFTuj_HuGqiALX1cjgBQ&sa=X&oi=news_result&ct=more-results&resnum=1&ved=0CDAQqgIwAA\">another blow\u003c/a> to California’s embattled plan to build a bullet train from San Francisco to Anaheim. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>House and Senate negotiators agreed to kill President Obama’s high speed rail program, which would have funneled billions of dollars for high speed rail construction. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Obama’s plan would have provided $8 billion in funding in 2012, and then an additional $53 billion over the next six years.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>California is already poised to collect $3 billion in federal stimulus funds, which will help it build the first leg of the line -- the much-maligned “Rail to Nowhere,” from Fresno to Bakersfield. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But in order to complete the full system from San Francisco to Anaheim, rail officials are counting on an additional $55 billion of federal money, as well as private investment. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Asked how the news from Washington affects California’s plans, High Speed Rail Authority spokeswoman Rachel Wall said the project isn’t dependent on 2012 federal funding. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“Our plan assumes no federal funding before 2014,” said Wall. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Wall said the High Speed Rail Authority will continue to work with Congress to obtain federal grants or loans beginning in 2014. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>“We’re looking to federal funding in the long term, but not the near term.”\u003c/p>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/47610/another-slowdown-for-high-speed-rail",
"authors": [
"210"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_309"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_47143": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_47143",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "47143",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1321387534000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1321387534,
"format": "aside",
"title": "Investigation Into Testing Raises Questions About Integrity of New Bay Bridge Span",
"headTitle": "Investigation Into Testing Raises Questions About Integrity of New Bay Bridge Span | KQED",
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47181\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 248px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/BayBridge2.jpg\">\u003cimg decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/BayBridge2.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"BayBridge\" width=\"248\" height=\"140\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47181\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Justin Sullivan/Getty\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>There have been a lot of \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/08/30/photos-from-top-of-the-bay-bridge-tower/\">hoopla\u003c/a> and \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/08/30/photos-from-top-of-the-bay-bridge-tower/\">photo ops\u003c/a> around the construction of the Bay Bridge’s new \u003ca href=\"http://baybridgeinfo.org/projects/sas\">East Span\u003c/a>, scheduled for completion in 2013. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But Sacramento Bee reporter Charles Piller this weekend threw cold water on the celebratory drive to completion with his \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/12/4050167/questions-raised-on-bay-bridge.html\">\u003cstrong>investigative piece\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> questioning the testing of the structural integrity of the bridge’s new Eastern Span. Caltrans has \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/15/4055349/san-francisco-bay-bridge-tests.html\">fired two employees\u003c/a> over the scandal, but the Bee report seems to indicate this may be only the beginning. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You can read Piller’s long \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/12/4050167/questions-raised-on-bay-bridge.html\">\u003cstrong>investigative report\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> here, or for a good summary, look at the edited transcript of Piller’s \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201111140930\">appearance yesterday on KQED Radio’s Forum\u003c/a>, after the audio of the show: \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\n\u003cstrong>Charles Piller\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’re talking about a variety of problems. Falsified data is the most troubling. We know in at least three circumstances that data was proved to be falsified by a technician at Caltrans responsible for testing the foundations of a variety of freeway structures. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We also know there were irregularities in both the design and the testing of the Bay Bridge main tower. There is no evidence at this point that data were falsified associated with that tower, however, because the design and the testing concerns are significant, experts I’ve spoken to suggest a review be made of this tower to ensure its safety.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Unfortunately the response from Caltrans has been mostly to assert that the structures, including the Bay Bridge tower, are safe, without providing evidence to suggest they’ve done the proper analysis to ensure that safety. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We did a close review of 50,000 testing documents, memos, personnel files, and evaluations of Caltrans data associated with bridge testing. We found many of their responses are directly contradicted by their own testing documents. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We found that structures all over the state of California were tested by an individual, Duane Wiles, known to have falsified data on at least three structures. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>He also failed to validate the function of the test instrument, a complex precision instrument that requires daily verification of its proper functioning in order to provide reliable data. Since he didn’t do that on the Bay Bridge and on many other structures over a period of years, there are experts who believe it calls into question the validity of the test results. In many cases he gave a clean bill of health to structures that were tested improperly. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There are a couple of other really troubling aspects that I’ve been hoping Caltrans can respond effectively to but haven’t so far. One is that the portions of the Bay Bridge Tower foundation tested by Wiles were not tested with a second testing technique that could have allayed many of the concerns associated with those piles. For some reason Caltrans did not test those piles that he was responsible for with a second testing technique. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Secondly, the technicians at Caltrans including, Mr. Wiles, for years and years did not save the raw data files associated with their tests. These are the most important part of determining whether other fabrications took place. So what Caltrans is asserting is that no other fabrications took place, but they don’t have the data files that could validate their claims. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Caltrans also claims a very thorough investigation was made once the first falsification was found in 2008, so that the tests were evaluated very carefully by their own internal investigators. But I have documents by the very people who were involved directly in conducting that so-called evaluation who describe it as cursory, as completely inadequate, and that Caltrans has grossly misrepresented that process. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>How safe will the bridge be? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Charles Piller\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The point here is that there’s some uncertainty in these structures in question. Caltrans disputes that strongly. But the experts we talked to were mixed on the degree of uncertainty these questions about the design and testing of the bridge piles would place on the structure itself. It’s unrealistic to retest or to replace or additionally support those piles because of the engineering difficulties and cost. No one is saying this bridge is unsafe; what we are saying is that because of these gross irregularities and irresponsible management and irresponsible testing procedures over a period of years, it’s reasonable to have an expert group take a look at this data, reassess the degree of uncertainty that might have been introduced, look at it under a worst-case scenario, and reassure the public if possible that this structure is completely safe and reliable. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Malcolm Dougherty, Interim Director of Caltrans\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It is true that we did have a problem with one individual in terms of falsification of data on three structures, none related to the Bay Bridge. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>When this came to light, we initiated an investigation internal to the Division of Engineering Services, the unit that runs the foundation testing. We also conducted an audit and investigation, internal to Caltrans. That progressed into an investigation done by the Federal Highway Administration’s Office of Inspector General. There was a progression of investigations done. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You’re pretty confident about the results?\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Malcolm Dougherty\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We reviewed everything this individual has been working on back to 2004 to see if there were any anomalies, any evidence of falsifications. We reviewed all the foundation testing on the Bay Bridge as well. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But why the firings only after the story broke?\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Malcolm Dougherty\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The firings also coincided with the conclusion of the investigation. Shortly after the first information that we had on the first falsification, he was moved from his job duty so he wasn’t completing actions related to the safety of inspections. He was reassigned. But then there was a period of letting the investigations play out before action was taken. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Tony Anziano, toll bridge program manager for Caltrans\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Obviously my focus is on the Bay Bridge. There is absolutely no evidence of any kind that there was any falsified data with respect to the testing performed on the tower foundations for the Bay Bridge. If you look at the article, it’s pretty clear they understood that, but they wanted a front page so they burrowed down into the avenue of design. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>He cited two so-called experts to support his point that there were irregularities in design. It’s kind of late in the game to be bringing that up. That design was thoroughly vetted both internally and externally and we have an independent panel of experts in place since day one who have taken a look and they’re very content with the design. So there is no evidence of any problems with respect to the Bay Bridge tower foundations. \u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Also, the Bee today held a \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/live/\">\u003cstrong>live chat\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> with Piller, who answered questions about his investigation. Click below to see a replay of the event.\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align: center\">\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=76866ef6ec/height=550/width=470\" scrolling=\"no\" height=\"550px\" width=\"470px\" frameborder=\"0\">\u003ca href=\"http://www.coveritlive.com/mobile.php/option=com_mobile/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=76866ef6ec\">The Bee’s Charles Piller hosts: Questions raised on Bay Bridge structural tests\u003c/a>\u003c/iframe>\u003c/div>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\u003cp>[ad floatright]\u003c/p>\n",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": true,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 1186,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [
"http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=76866ef6ec/height=550/width=470"
],
"paragraphCount": 37
},
"modified": 1685490901,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "There have been a lot of hoopla and photo ops around the construction of the Bay Bridge's new East Span, scheduled for completion in 2013. But Sacramento Bee reporter Charles Piller this weekend threw cold water on the celebratory drive to completion with his investigative piece questioning the testing of the structural integrity of the",
"title": "Investigation Into Testing Raises Questions About Integrity of New Bay Bridge Span | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Investigation Into Testing Raises Questions About Integrity of New Bay Bridge Span",
"datePublished": "2011-11-15T12:05:34-08:00",
"dateModified": "2023-05-30T16:55:01-07:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "bay-bridge-investigation",
"status": "publish",
"templateType": "standard",
"excludeFromSiteSearch": "Include",
"featuredImageType": "standard",
"articleAge": "0",
"path": "/news/47143/bay-bridge-investigation",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47181\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\" style=\"max-width: 248px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/BayBridge2.jpg\">\u003cimg decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/BayBridge2.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"BayBridge\" width=\"248\" height=\"140\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47181\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Justin Sullivan/Getty\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>There have been a lot of \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/08/30/photos-from-top-of-the-bay-bridge-tower/\">hoopla\u003c/a> and \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/08/30/photos-from-top-of-the-bay-bridge-tower/\">photo ops\u003c/a> around the construction of the Bay Bridge’s new \u003ca href=\"http://baybridgeinfo.org/projects/sas\">East Span\u003c/a>, scheduled for completion in 2013. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But Sacramento Bee reporter Charles Piller this weekend threw cold water on the celebratory drive to completion with his \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/12/4050167/questions-raised-on-bay-bridge.html\">\u003cstrong>investigative piece\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> questioning the testing of the structural integrity of the bridge’s new Eastern Span. Caltrans has \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/15/4055349/san-francisco-bay-bridge-tests.html\">fired two employees\u003c/a> over the scandal, but the Bee report seems to indicate this may be only the beginning. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You can read Piller’s long \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/2011/11/12/4050167/questions-raised-on-bay-bridge.html\">\u003cstrong>investigative report\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> here, or for a good summary, look at the edited transcript of Piller’s \u003ca href=\"http://www.kqed.org/a/forum/R201111140930\">appearance yesterday on KQED Radio’s Forum\u003c/a>, after the audio of the show: \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c!--more-->\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>\n\u003cstrong>Charles Piller\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We’re talking about a variety of problems. Falsified data is the most troubling. We know in at least three circumstances that data was proved to be falsified by a technician at Caltrans responsible for testing the foundations of a variety of freeway structures. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We also know there were irregularities in both the design and the testing of the Bay Bridge main tower. There is no evidence at this point that data were falsified associated with that tower, however, because the design and the testing concerns are significant, experts I’ve spoken to suggest a review be made of this tower to ensure its safety.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Unfortunately the response from Caltrans has been mostly to assert that the structures, including the Bay Bridge tower, are safe, without providing evidence to suggest they’ve done the proper analysis to ensure that safety. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We did a close review of 50,000 testing documents, memos, personnel files, and evaluations of Caltrans data associated with bridge testing. We found many of their responses are directly contradicted by their own testing documents. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We found that structures all over the state of California were tested by an individual, Duane Wiles, known to have falsified data on at least three structures. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>He also failed to validate the function of the test instrument, a complex precision instrument that requires daily verification of its proper functioning in order to provide reliable data. Since he didn’t do that on the Bay Bridge and on many other structures over a period of years, there are experts who believe it calls into question the validity of the test results. In many cases he gave a clean bill of health to structures that were tested improperly. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>There are a couple of other really troubling aspects that I’ve been hoping Caltrans can respond effectively to but haven’t so far. One is that the portions of the Bay Bridge Tower foundation tested by Wiles were not tested with a second testing technique that could have allayed many of the concerns associated with those piles. For some reason Caltrans did not test those piles that he was responsible for with a second testing technique. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Secondly, the technicians at Caltrans including, Mr. Wiles, for years and years did not save the raw data files associated with their tests. These are the most important part of determining whether other fabrications took place. So what Caltrans is asserting is that no other fabrications took place, but they don’t have the data files that could validate their claims. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Caltrans also claims a very thorough investigation was made once the first falsification was found in 2008, so that the tests were evaluated very carefully by their own internal investigators. But I have documents by the very people who were involved directly in conducting that so-called evaluation who describe it as cursory, as completely inadequate, and that Caltrans has grossly misrepresented that process. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>How safe will the bridge be? \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Charles Piller\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The point here is that there’s some uncertainty in these structures in question. Caltrans disputes that strongly. But the experts we talked to were mixed on the degree of uncertainty these questions about the design and testing of the bridge piles would place on the structure itself. It’s unrealistic to retest or to replace or additionally support those piles because of the engineering difficulties and cost. No one is saying this bridge is unsafe; what we are saying is that because of these gross irregularities and irresponsible management and irresponsible testing procedures over a period of years, it’s reasonable to have an expert group take a look at this data, reassess the degree of uncertainty that might have been introduced, look at it under a worst-case scenario, and reassure the public if possible that this structure is completely safe and reliable. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Malcolm Dougherty, Interim Director of Caltrans\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>It is true that we did have a problem with one individual in terms of falsification of data on three structures, none related to the Bay Bridge. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>When this came to light, we initiated an investigation internal to the Division of Engineering Services, the unit that runs the foundation testing. We also conducted an audit and investigation, internal to Caltrans. That progressed into an investigation done by the Federal Highway Administration’s Office of Inspector General. There was a progression of investigations done. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>You’re pretty confident about the results?\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Malcolm Dougherty\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>We reviewed everything this individual has been working on back to 2004 to see if there were any anomalies, any evidence of falsifications. We reviewed all the foundation testing on the Bay Bridge as well. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Michael Krasny\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>But why the firings only after the story broke?\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Malcolm Dougherty\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The firings also coincided with the conclusion of the investigation. Shortly after the first information that we had on the first falsification, he was moved from his job duty so he wasn’t completing actions related to the safety of inspections. He was reassigned. But then there was a period of letting the investigations play out before action was taken. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003cstrong>Tony Anziano, toll bridge program manager for Caltrans\u003c/strong>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Obviously my focus is on the Bay Bridge. There is absolutely no evidence of any kind that there was any falsified data with respect to the testing performed on the tower foundations for the Bay Bridge. If you look at the article, it’s pretty clear they understood that, but they wanted a front page so they burrowed down into the avenue of design. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>He cited two so-called experts to support his point that there were irregularities in design. It’s kind of late in the game to be bringing that up. That design was thoroughly vetted both internally and externally and we have an independent panel of experts in place since day one who have taken a look and they’re very content with the design. So there is no evidence of any problems with respect to the Bay Bridge tower foundations. \u003c/p>\n\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Also, the Bee today held a \u003ca href=\"http://www.sacbee.com/live/\">\u003cstrong>live chat\u003c/strong>\u003c/a> with Piller, who answered questions about his investigation. Click below to see a replay of the event.\u003c/p>\n\u003cdiv style=\"text-align: center\">\u003ciframe loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http://www.coveritlive.com/index2.php/option=com_altcaster/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=76866ef6ec/height=550/width=470\" scrolling=\"no\" height=\"550px\" width=\"470px\" frameborder=\"0\">\u003ca href=\"http://www.coveritlive.com/mobile.php/option=com_mobile/task=viewaltcast/altcast_code=76866ef6ec\">The Bee’s Charles Piller hosts: Questions raised on Bay Bridge structural tests\u003c/a>\u003c/iframe>\u003c/div>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "floatright"
},
"numeric": [
"floatright"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/47143/bay-bridge-investigation",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_8",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_231",
"news_18",
"news_38"
],
"label": "news_6944"
},
"news_46987": {
"type": "posts",
"id": "news_46987",
"meta": {
"index": "posts_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "46987",
"score": null,
"sort": [
1321302903000
]
},
"parent": 0,
"labelTerm": {
"site": "news",
"term": 6944
},
"blocks": [],
"publishDate": 1321302903,
"format": "aside",
"disqusTitle": "Linton Johnson Reassigned by BART; \"You'll Have to Go to the Communications Department I Built\" ",
"title": "Linton Johnson Reassigned by BART; \"You'll Have to Go to the Communications Department I Built\" ",
"headTitle": "News Fix | KQED News",
"content": "\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47000\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 120px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/lindtonjohnson.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/lindtonjohnson.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"lindtonjohnson\" width=\"120\" height=\"161\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47000\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Linton Johnson\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>BART today announced a re-organization of its communications department that does not include longtime spokesperson Linton Johnson. When contacted by the \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/bay-area/2011/11/bart-moves-spokesman-linton-johnson-new-position#ixzz1dhxnHfQZ\">San Francisco Examiner\u003c/a>, Johnson said, \"They’re telling me I no longer speak for the district. If you want answers, you’ll have to go the communications department that I built.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>BART outlined Johnson's new role in a press release announcing Jim Allison and Luna Salaver as the \"key media contact points for BART...\" Johnson had been the primary spokesperson until he went on personal leave in late August. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Johnson's new role, per BART:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Linton Johnson has been appointed to the position of Strategic Program Manager for External Affairs. He will work with BART departments to develop and implement large scale communications strategies for major\u003cbr>\nDistrict programs. Some of these programs include the planning and acquisition of a new rail car fleet for BART, a pilot project to place digital screens on station platforms to improve communication of important messages and public information, and the on-going roll out of the Clipper Card, among other initiatives.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Johnson's reassignment comes a few months after a particularly difficult period for both him and BART. In August \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/08/15/bart-decries-hacker-attack-defends-cell-phone-shutdown/\">protesters targeted the transit agency\u003c/a> over the shooting death by BART police of Charles Hill, a 45-year-old transient who police said had been brandishing a knife at them.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Anti-BART sentiment gained momentum after BART shut down cell phone service in a successful attempt to pre-emptively disrupt a planned protest. A loosely-knit group of computer activists self-identifying under the banner \"Anonymous\" took severe offense at the action, equating it to tactics used by authoritarian regimes like Egypt during this year's \"\u003ca href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring\">Arab Spring\u003c/a>.\" \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>[ad fullwidth]\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Johnson, whose job it was to \u003ca href=\"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMe22epBu54\">defend BART\u003c/a> over the Hill incident and, previously, the shooting death of Oscar Grant by BART cop Johannes Mehserle, attracted the special ire of the anonymous \"hacktivists.\" When Johnson acknowledged the idea for shutting down cell service was his, that really enflamed the group, a member of whom publicized semi-nude photos of Johnson, allegedly taken from his web site. Stating that his grandmorther was ill, Johnson then went on personal leave and has not been heard from since.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Full press release from BART: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>OAKLAND, CA ñ BART has announced a reorganization of its communication and spokesperson functions to provide more transparent and precise information about its operations. The need to provide comprehensive information on a wide range of functional areas within the organization, combined with the\u003cbr>\nsheer volume of information of interest to the public, drove the decision\u003cbr>\nto diversify the communications roles.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The restructured department now is now led by one Department Manager and\u003cbr>\ntwo communications officers (CO). The two COs will share media response\u003cbr>\nduties to ensure 24 hour coverage (after hours via pager.) The COs will\u003cbr>\nwork with subject matter experts in various departments to respond to media\u003cbr>\ninquiries. In addition, BART is implementing a recommendation made by the\u003cbr>\nNational Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE) as part\u003cbr>\nof its extensive review of the BART Police Department to establish a Media\u003cbr>\nRepresentative for the BART Police Department. The BART Police Department\u003cbr>\nMedia Representative will work with the Communications Officers to more\u003cbr>\neffectively respond to all media requests for information on BART Police\u003cbr>\nmatters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Jim Allison and Luna Salaver from the Communications Department will remain\u003cbr>\nthe key media contact points for BART and will share Communication Officer\u003cbr>\nduties for the agency. Luna Salaver, who is a Public Information Officer on\u003cbr>\nloan from Capital Corridor, will remain as a part time CO until the\u003cbr>\nposition is posted and filled. Please contact them for all your\u003cbr>\ninformation and interview requests. They will direct and facilitate\u003cbr>\ninquiries to the appropriate spokesperson if the question is to be\u003cbr>\naddressed by other functional departments or by the General Manager.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Their contact information is:\u003cbr>\nJim Allison\u003cbr>\nOffice 510 464 7110\u003cbr>\nEmail JAllis1@bart.gov\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\n",
"disqusIdentifier": "46987 http://ww2.kqed.org/news/?p=46987",
"disqusUrl": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/11/14/linton-johnson-reassigned-by-bart/",
"stats": {
"hasVideo": false,
"hasChartOrMap": false,
"hasAudio": false,
"hasPolis": false,
"wordCount": 661,
"hasGoogleForm": false,
"hasGallery": false,
"hasHearkenModule": false,
"iframeSrcs": [],
"paragraphCount": 14
},
"modified": 1321304969,
"excerpt": null,
"headData": {
"twImgId": "",
"twTitle": "",
"ogTitle": "",
"ogImgId": "",
"twDescription": "",
"description": "BART today announced a re-organization of its communications department that does not include longtime spokesperson Linton Johnson. When contacted by the San Francisco Examiner, Johnson said, "They’re telling me I no longer speak for the district. If you want answers, you’ll have to go the communications department that I built." BART outlined Johnson's new role",
"title": "Linton Johnson Reassigned by BART; \"You'll Have to Go to the Communications Department I Built\" | KQED",
"ogDescription": "",
"schema": {
"@context": "https://schema.org",
"@type": "NewsArticle",
"headline": "Linton Johnson Reassigned by BART; \"You'll Have to Go to the Communications Department I Built\" ",
"datePublished": "2011-11-14T12:35:03-08:00",
"dateModified": "2011-11-14T13:09:29-08:00",
"image": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"isAccessibleForFree": "True",
"publisher": {
"@type": "NewsMediaOrganization",
"@id": "https://www.kqed.org/#organization",
"name": "KQED",
"logo": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"url": "https://www.kqed.org",
"sameAs": [
"https://www.facebook.com/KQED",
"https://twitter.com/KQED",
"https://www.instagram.com/kqed/",
"https://www.tiktok.com/@kqedofficial",
"https://www.linkedin.com/company/kqed",
"https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeC0IOo7i1P_61zVUWbJ4nw"
]
}
}
},
"guestAuthors": [],
"slug": "linton-johnson-reassigned-by-bart",
"status": "publish",
"path": "/news/46987/linton-johnson-reassigned-by-bart",
"audioTrackLength": null,
"parsedContent": [
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003cfigure id=\"attachment_47000\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\" style=\"max-width: 120px\">\u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/lindtonjohnson.jpg\">\u003cimg src=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2011/11/lindtonjohnson.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"lindtonjohnson\" width=\"120\" height=\"161\" class=\"size-full wp-image-47000\">\u003c/a>\u003cfigcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Linton Johnson\u003c/figcaption>\u003c/figure>\n\u003cp>BART today announced a re-organization of its communications department that does not include longtime spokesperson Linton Johnson. When contacted by the \u003ca href=\"http://www.sfexaminer.com/local/bay-area/2011/11/bart-moves-spokesman-linton-johnson-new-position#ixzz1dhxnHfQZ\">San Francisco Examiner\u003c/a>, Johnson said, \"They’re telling me I no longer speak for the district. If you want answers, you’ll have to go the communications department that I built.\"\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>BART outlined Johnson's new role in a press release announcing Jim Allison and Luna Salaver as the \"key media contact points for BART...\" Johnson had been the primary spokesperson until he went on personal leave in late August. \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Johnson's new role, per BART:\u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>Linton Johnson has been appointed to the position of Strategic Program Manager for External Affairs. He will work with BART departments to develop and implement large scale communications strategies for major\u003cbr>\nDistrict programs. Some of these programs include the planning and acquisition of a new rail car fleet for BART, a pilot project to place digital screens on station platforms to improve communication of important messages and public information, and the on-going roll out of the Clipper Card, among other initiatives.\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\u003cp>Johnson's reassignment comes a few months after a particularly difficult period for both him and BART. In August \u003ca href=\"http://ww2.kqed.org/news/2011/08/15/bart-decries-hacker-attack-defends-cell-phone-shutdown/\">protesters targeted the transit agency\u003c/a> over the shooting death by BART police of Charles Hill, a 45-year-old transient who police said had been brandishing a knife at them.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Anti-BART sentiment gained momentum after BART shut down cell phone service in a successful attempt to pre-emptively disrupt a planned protest. A loosely-knit group of computer activists self-identifying under the banner \"Anonymous\" took severe offense at the action, equating it to tactics used by authoritarian regimes like Egypt during this year's \"\u003ca href=\"http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arab_Spring\">Arab Spring\u003c/a>.\" \u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\u003c/div>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
},
{
"type": "component",
"content": "",
"name": "ad",
"attributes": {
"named": {
"label": "fullwidth"
},
"numeric": [
"fullwidth"
]
}
},
{
"type": "contentString",
"content": "\u003cdiv class=\"post-body\">\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Johnson, whose job it was to \u003ca href=\"http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMe22epBu54\">defend BART\u003c/a> over the Hill incident and, previously, the shooting death of Oscar Grant by BART cop Johannes Mehserle, attracted the special ire of the anonymous \"hacktivists.\" When Johnson acknowledged the idea for shutting down cell service was his, that really enflamed the group, a member of whom publicized semi-nude photos of Johnson, allegedly taken from his web site. Stating that his grandmorther was ill, Johnson then went on personal leave and has not been heard from since.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Full press release from BART: \u003c/p>\n\u003cblockquote>\u003cp>OAKLAND, CA ñ BART has announced a reorganization of its communication and spokesperson functions to provide more transparent and precise information about its operations. The need to provide comprehensive information on a wide range of functional areas within the organization, combined with the\u003cbr>\nsheer volume of information of interest to the public, drove the decision\u003cbr>\nto diversify the communications roles.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>The restructured department now is now led by one Department Manager and\u003cbr>\ntwo communications officers (CO). The two COs will share media response\u003cbr>\nduties to ensure 24 hour coverage (after hours via pager.) The COs will\u003cbr>\nwork with subject matter experts in various departments to respond to media\u003cbr>\ninquiries. In addition, BART is implementing a recommendation made by the\u003cbr>\nNational Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives (NOBLE) as part\u003cbr>\nof its extensive review of the BART Police Department to establish a Media\u003cbr>\nRepresentative for the BART Police Department. The BART Police Department\u003cbr>\nMedia Representative will work with the Communications Officers to more\u003cbr>\neffectively respond to all media requests for information on BART Police\u003cbr>\nmatters.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Jim Allison and Luna Salaver from the Communications Department will remain\u003cbr>\nthe key media contact points for BART and will share Communication Officer\u003cbr>\nduties for the agency. Luna Salaver, who is a Public Information Officer on\u003cbr>\nloan from Capital Corridor, will remain as a part time CO until the\u003cbr>\nposition is posted and filled. Please contact them for all your\u003cbr>\ninformation and interview requests. They will direct and facilitate\u003cbr>\ninquiries to the appropriate spokesperson if the question is to be\u003cbr>\naddressed by other functional departments or by the General Manager.\u003c/p>\n\u003cp>Their contact information is:\u003cbr>\nJim Allison\u003cbr>\nOffice 510 464 7110\u003cbr>\nEmail JAllis1@bart.gov\n\u003c/p>\u003c/blockquote>\n\n\u003c/div>\u003c/p>",
"attributes": {
"named": {},
"numeric": []
}
}
],
"link": "/news/46987/linton-johnson-reassigned-by-bart",
"authors": [
"80"
],
"programs": [
"news_6944"
],
"categories": [
"news_6188",
"news_1397"
],
"tags": [
"news_1782",
"news_1683",
"news_686",
"news_2071"
],
"label": "news_6944"
}
},
"podcastsReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"podcasts": {}
},
"radioProgramsReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"radioPrograms": {}
},
"radioSearchSegmentsReducer": {},
"programsReducer": {
"all-things-considered": {
"id": "all-things-considered",
"title": "All Things Considered",
"info": "Every weekday, \u003cem>All Things Considered\u003c/em> hosts Robert Siegel, Audie Cornish, Ari Shapiro, and Kelly McEvers present the program's trademark mix of news, interviews, commentaries, reviews, and offbeat features. Michel Martin hosts on the weekends.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 1pm-2pm, 4:30pm-6:30pm\u003cbr />SAT-SUN 5pm-6pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/All-Things-Considered-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/all-things-considered/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/all-things-considered"
},
"american-suburb-podcast": {
"id": "american-suburb-podcast",
"title": "American Suburb: The Podcast",
"tagline": "The flip side of gentrification, told through one town",
"info": "Gentrification is changing cities across America, forcing people from neighborhoods they have long called home. Call them the displaced. Now those priced out of the Bay Area are looking for a better life in an unlikely place. American Suburb follows this migration to one California town along the Delta, 45 miles from San Francisco. But is this once sleepy suburb ready for them?",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/American-Suburb-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/news/series/american-suburb-podcast",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 19
},
"link": "/news/series/american-suburb-podcast/",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/RBrW",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?mt=2&id=1287748328",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/American-Suburb-p1086805/",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/series/american-suburb-podcast/feed/podcast",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkMzMDExODgxNjA5"
}
},
"baycurious": {
"id": "baycurious",
"title": "Bay Curious",
"tagline": "Exploring the Bay Area, one question at a time",
"info": "KQED’s new podcast, Bay Curious, gets to the bottom of the mysteries — both profound and peculiar — that give the Bay Area its unique identity. And we’ll do it with your help! You ask the questions. You decide what Bay Curious investigates. And you join us on the journey to find the answers.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Bay-Curious-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Bay Curious",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/news/series/baycurious",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 3
},
"link": "/podcasts/baycurious",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/bay-curious/id1172473406",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/500557090/bay-curious",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/category/bay-curious-podcast/feed/podcast",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/9a90d476-aa04-455d-9a4c-0871ed6216d4/bay-curious",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/bay-curious",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/6O76IdmhixfijmhTZLIJ8k"
}
},
"bbc-world-service": {
"id": "bbc-world-service",
"title": "BBC World Service",
"info": "The day's top stories from BBC News compiled twice daily in the week, once at weekends.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 9pm-10pm, TUE-FRI 1am-2am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/BBC-World-Service-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/live:bbc_world_service",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "BBC World Service"
},
"link": "/radio/program/bbc-world-service",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/global-news-podcast/id135067274?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/BBC-World-Service-p455581/",
"rss": "https://podcasts.files.bbci.co.uk/p02nq0gn.rss"
}
},
"californiareport": {
"id": "californiareport",
"title": "The California Report",
"tagline": "California, day by day",
"info": "KQED’s statewide radio news program providing daily coverage of issues, trends and public policy decisions.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-California-Report-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The California Report",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/californiareport",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 8
},
"link": "/californiareport",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/kqeds-the-california-report/id79681292",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/26099305-72af-4542-9dde-ac1807fe36d5/kqed-s-the-california-report",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432285393/the-california-report",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqedfm-kqeds-the-california-report-podcast-8838",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/tcram/feed/podcast"
}
},
"californiareportmagazine": {
"id": "californiareportmagazine",
"title": "The California Report Magazine",
"tagline": "Your state, your stories",
"info": "Every week, The California Report Magazine takes you on a road trip for the ears: to visit the places and meet the people who make California unique. The in-depth storytelling podcast from the California Report.",
"airtime": "FRI 4:30pm-5pm, 6:30pm-7pm, 11pm-11:30pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-California-Report-Magazine-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The California Report Magazine",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/californiareportmagazine",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 10
},
"link": "/californiareportmagazine",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-california-report-magazine/id1314750545",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM3NjkwNjk1OTAz",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/564733126/the-california-report-magazine",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-california-report-magazine",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/tcrmag/feed/podcast"
}
},
"city-arts": {
"id": "city-arts",
"title": "City Arts & Lectures",
"info": "A one-hour radio program to hear celebrated writers, artists and thinkers address contemporary ideas and values, often discussing the creative process. Please note: tapes or transcripts are not available",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/cityartsandlecture-300x300.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.cityarts.net/",
"airtime": "SUN 1pm-2pm, TUE 10pm, WED 1am",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "City Arts & Lectures"
},
"link": "https://www.cityarts.net",
"subscribe": {
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/City-Arts-and-Lectures-p692/",
"rss": "https://www.cityarts.net/feed/"
}
},
"closealltabs": {
"id": "closealltabs",
"title": "Close All Tabs",
"tagline": "Your irreverent guide to the trends redefining our world",
"info": "Close All Tabs breaks down how digital culture shapes our world through thoughtful insights and irreverent humor.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/CAT_2_Tile-scaled.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Close All Tabs",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/closealltabs",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 1
},
"link": "/podcasts/closealltabs",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/close-all-tabs/id214663465",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC6993880386",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/92d9d4ac-67a3-4eed-b10a-fb45d45b1ef2/close-all-tabs",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/6LAJFHnGK1pYXYzv6SIol6?si=deb0cae19813417c"
}
},
"code-switch-life-kit": {
"id": "code-switch-life-kit",
"title": "Code Switch / Life Kit",
"info": "\u003cem>Code Switch\u003c/em>, which listeners will hear in the first part of the hour, has fearless and much-needed conversations about race. Hosted by journalists of color, the show tackles the subject of race head-on, exploring how it impacts every part of society — from politics and pop culture to history, sports and more.\u003cbr />\u003cbr />\u003cem>Life Kit\u003c/em>, which will be in the second part of the hour, guides you through spaces and feelings no one prepares you for — from finances to mental health, from workplace microaggressions to imposter syndrome, from relationships to parenting. The show features experts with real world experience and shares their knowledge. Because everyone needs a little help being human.\u003cbr />\u003cbr />\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510312/codeswitch\">\u003cem>Code Switch\u003c/em> offical site and podcast\u003c/a>\u003cbr />\u003ca href=\"https://www.npr.org/lifekit\">\u003cem>Life Kit\u003c/em> offical site and podcast\u003c/a>\u003cbr />",
"airtime": "SUN 9pm-10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Code-Switch-Life-Kit-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/code-switch-life-kit",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/1112190608?mt=2&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cubnByLm9yZy9yc3MvcG9kY2FzdC5waHA_aWQ9NTEwMzEy",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3bExJ9JQpkwNhoHvaIIuyV",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510312/podcast.xml"
}
},
"commonwealth-club": {
"id": "commonwealth-club",
"title": "Commonwealth Club of California Podcast",
"info": "The Commonwealth Club of California is the nation's oldest and largest public affairs forum. As a non-partisan forum, The Club brings to the public airwaves diverse viewpoints on important topics. The Club's weekly radio broadcast - the oldest in the U.S., dating back to 1924 - is carried across the nation on public radio stations and is now podcasting. Our website archive features audio of our recent programs, as well as selected speeches from our long and distinguished history. This podcast feed is usually updated twice a week and is always un-edited.",
"airtime": "THU 10pm, FRI 1am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Commonwealth-Club-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.commonwealthclub.org/podcasts",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "Commonwealth Club of California"
},
"link": "/radio/program/commonwealth-club",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/commonwealth-club-of-california-podcast/id976334034?mt=2",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5jb21tb253ZWFsdGhjbHViLm9yZy9hdWRpby9wb2RjYXN0L3dlZWtseS54bWw",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Commonwealth-Club-of-California-p1060/"
}
},
"forum": {
"id": "forum",
"title": "Forum",
"tagline": "The conversation starts here",
"info": "KQED’s live call-in program discussing local, state, national and international issues, as well as in-depth interviews.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 9am-11am, 10pm-11pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Forum-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Forum with Mina Kim and Alexis Madrigal",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/forum",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 9
},
"link": "/forum",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/kqeds-forum/id73329719",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM5NTU3MzgxNjMz",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432307980/forum",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqedfm-kqeds-forum-podcast",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC9557381633"
}
},
"freakonomics-radio": {
"id": "freakonomics-radio",
"title": "Freakonomics Radio",
"info": "Freakonomics Radio is a one-hour award-winning podcast and public-radio project hosted by Stephen Dubner, with co-author Steve Levitt as a regular guest. It is produced in partnership with WNYC.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/05/freakonomicsRadio.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://freakonomics.com/",
"airtime": "SUN 1am-2am, SAT 3pm-4pm",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/freakonomics-radio",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/4s8b",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/freakonomics-radio/id354668519",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/WNYC-Podcasts/Freakonomics-Radio-p272293/",
"rss": "https://feeds.feedburner.com/freakonomicsradio"
}
},
"fresh-air": {
"id": "fresh-air",
"title": "Fresh Air",
"info": "Hosted by Terry Gross, \u003cem>Fresh Air from WHYY\u003c/em> is the Peabody Award-winning weekday magazine of contemporary arts and issues. One of public radio's most popular programs, Fresh Air features intimate conversations with today's biggest luminaries.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 7pm-8pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Fresh-Air-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/fresh-air/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/fresh-air",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/4s8b",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=214089682&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Fresh-Air-p17/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/381444908/podcast.xml"
}
},
"here-and-now": {
"id": "here-and-now",
"title": "Here & Now",
"info": "A live production of NPR and WBUR Boston, in collaboration with stations across the country, Here & Now reflects the fluid world of news as it's happening in the middle of the day, with timely, in-depth news, interviews and conversation. Hosted by Robin Young, Jeremy Hobson and Tonya Mosley.",
"airtime": "MON-THU 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Here-And-Now-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://www.wbur.org/hereandnow",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/here-and-now",
"subsdcribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?mt=2&id=426698661",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Here--Now-p211/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510051/podcast.xml"
}
},
"hidden-brain": {
"id": "hidden-brain",
"title": "Hidden Brain",
"info": "Shankar Vedantam uses science and storytelling to reveal the unconscious patterns that drive human behavior, shape our choices and direct our relationships.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/05/hiddenbrain.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/series/423302056/hidden-brain",
"airtime": "SUN 7pm-8pm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "NPR"
},
"link": "/radio/program/hidden-brain",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/hidden-brain/id1028908750?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Science-Podcasts/Hidden-Brain-p787503/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510308/podcast.xml"
}
},
"how-i-built-this": {
"id": "how-i-built-this",
"title": "How I Built This with Guy Raz",
"info": "Guy Raz dives into the stories behind some of the world's best known companies. How I Built This weaves a narrative journey about innovators, entrepreneurs and idealists—and the movements they built.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/wp-content/uploads/sites/10/2018/05/howIBuiltThis.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/510313/how-i-built-this",
"airtime": "SUN 7:30pm-8pm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/how-i-built-this",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/3zxy",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/how-i-built-this-with-guy-raz/id1150510297?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Arts--Culture-Podcasts/How-I-Built-This-p910896/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510313/podcast.xml"
}
},
"hyphenacion": {
"id": "hyphenacion",
"title": "Hyphenación",
"tagline": "Where conversation and cultura meet",
"info": "What kind of no sabo word is Hyphenación? For us, it’s about living within a hyphenation. Like being a third-gen Mexican-American from the Texas border now living that Bay Area Chicano life. Like Xorje! Each week we bring together a couple of hyphenated Latinos to talk all about personal life choices: family, careers, relationships, belonging … everything is on the table. ",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Hyphenacion_FinalAssets_PodcastTile.png",
"imageAlt": "KQED Hyphenación",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/hyphenacion",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 15
},
"link": "/podcasts/hyphenacion",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/hyphenaci%C3%B3n/id1191591838",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/2p3Fifq96nw9BPcmFdIq0o?si=39209f7b25774f38",
"youtube": "https://www.youtube.com/c/kqedarts",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/6c3dd23c-93fb-4aab-97ba-1725fa6315f1/hyphenaci%C3%B3n",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC2275451163"
}
},
"jerrybrown": {
"id": "jerrybrown",
"title": "The Political Mind of Jerry Brown",
"tagline": "Lessons from a lifetime in politics",
"info": "The Political Mind of Jerry Brown brings listeners the wisdom of the former Governor, Mayor, and presidential candidate. Scott Shafer interviewed Brown for more than 40 hours, covering the former governor's life and half-century in the political game – and Brown has some lessons he'd like to share. ",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Political-Mind-of-Jerry-Brown-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Political Mind of Jerry Brown",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/jerrybrown",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 18
},
"link": "/podcasts/jerrybrown",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/790253322/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1492194549",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/series/jerrybrown/feed/podcast/",
"tuneIn": "http://tun.in/pjGcK",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/54C1dmuyFyKMFttY6X2j6r?si=K8SgRCoISNK6ZbjpXrX5-w",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/44420f75-3b0e-4301-ab3b-16da6b09e543/the-political-mind-of-jerry-brown"
}
},
"latino-usa": {
"id": "latino-usa",
"title": "Latino USA",
"airtime": "MON 1am-2am, SUN 6pm-7pm",
"info": "Latino USA, the radio journal of news and culture, is the only national, English-language radio program produced from a Latino perspective.",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/latinoUsa.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://latinousa.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/latino-usa",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/xtTd",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=79681317&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Latino-USA-p621/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510016/podcast.xml"
}
},
"marketplace": {
"id": "marketplace",
"title": "Marketplace",
"info": "Our flagship program, helmed by Kai Ryssdal, examines what the day in money delivered, through stories, conversations, newsworthy numbers and more. Updated Monday through Friday at about 3:30 p.m. PT.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 4pm-4:30pm, MON-WED 6:30pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Marketplace-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.marketplace.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "American Public Media"
},
"link": "/radio/program/marketplace",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=201853034&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/APM-Marketplace-p88/",
"rss": "https://feeds.publicradio.org/public_feeds/marketplace-pm/rss/rss"
}
},
"masters-of-scale": {
"id": "masters-of-scale",
"title": "Masters of Scale",
"info": "Masters of Scale is an original podcast in which LinkedIn co-founder and Greylock Partner Reid Hoffman sets out to describe and prove theories that explain how great entrepreneurs take their companies from zero to a gazillion in ingenious fashion.",
"airtime": "Every other Wednesday June 12 through October 16 at 8pm (repeats Thursdays at 2am)",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Masters-of-Scale-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://mastersofscale.com/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "WaitWhat"
},
"link": "/radio/program/masters-of-scale",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "http://mastersofscale.app.link/",
"rss": "https://rss.art19.com/masters-of-scale"
}
},
"mindshift": {
"id": "mindshift",
"title": "MindShift",
"tagline": "A podcast about the future of learning and how we raise our kids",
"info": "The MindShift podcast explores the innovations in education that are shaping how kids learn. Hosts Ki Sung and Katrina Schwartz introduce listeners to educators, researchers, parents and students who are developing effective ways to improve how kids learn. We cover topics like how fed-up administrators are developing surprising tactics to deal with classroom disruptions; how listening to podcasts are helping kids develop reading skills; the consequences of overparenting; and why interdisciplinary learning can engage students on all ends of the traditional achievement spectrum. This podcast is part of the MindShift education site, a division of KQED News. KQED is an NPR/PBS member station based in San Francisco. You can also visit the MindShift website for episodes and supplemental blog posts or tweet us \u003ca href=\"https://twitter.com/MindShiftKQED\">@MindShiftKQED\u003c/a> or visit us at \u003ca href=\"/mindshift\">MindShift.KQED.org\u003c/a>",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Mindshift-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED MindShift: How We Will Learn",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/mindshift/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 12
},
"link": "/podcasts/mindshift",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/mindshift-podcast/id1078765985",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkM1NzY0NjAwNDI5",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/464615685/mind-shift-podcast",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/stories-teachers-share",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/0MxSpNYZKNprFLCl7eEtyx"
}
},
"morning-edition": {
"id": "morning-edition",
"title": "Morning Edition",
"info": "\u003cem>Morning Edition\u003c/em> takes listeners around the country and the world with multi-faceted stories and commentaries every weekday. Hosts Steve Inskeep, David Greene and Rachel Martin bring you the latest breaking news and features to prepare you for the day.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 3am-9am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Morning-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/morning-edition/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/morning-edition"
},
"onourwatch": {
"id": "onourwatch",
"title": "On Our Watch",
"tagline": "Deeply-reported investigative journalism",
"info": "For decades, the process for how police police themselves has been inconsistent – if not opaque. In some states, like California, these proceedings were completely hidden. After a new police transparency law unsealed scores of internal affairs files, our reporters set out to examine these cases and the shadow world of police discipline. On Our Watch brings listeners into the rooms where officers are questioned and witnesses are interrogated to find out who this system is really protecting. Is it the officers, or the public they've sworn to serve?",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/On-Our-Watch-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "On Our Watch from NPR and KQED",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/onourwatch",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 11
},
"link": "/podcasts/onourwatch",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/podcast/id1567098962",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5ucHIub3JnLzUxMDM2MC9wb2RjYXN0LnhtbD9zYz1nb29nbGVwb2RjYXN0cw",
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/onourwatch",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/0OLWoyizopu6tY1XiuX70x",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/On-Our-Watch-p1436229/",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/show/on-our-watch",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510360/podcast.xml"
}
},
"on-the-media": {
"id": "on-the-media",
"title": "On The Media",
"info": "Our weekly podcast explores how the media 'sausage' is made, casts an incisive eye on fluctuations in the marketplace of ideas, and examines threats to the freedom of information and expression in America and abroad. For one hour a week, the show tries to lift the veil from the process of \"making media,\" especially news media, because it's through that lens that we see the world and the world sees us",
"airtime": "SUN 2pm-3pm, MON 12am-1am",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/onTheMedia.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/otm",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "wnyc"
},
"link": "/radio/program/on-the-media",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/on-the-media/id73330715?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/On-the-Media-p69/",
"rss": "http://feeds.wnyc.org/onthemedia"
}
},
"pbs-newshour": {
"id": "pbs-newshour",
"title": "PBS NewsHour",
"info": "Analysis, background reports and updates from the PBS NewsHour putting today's news in context.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 3pm-4pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/PBS-News-Hour-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "pbs"
},
"link": "/radio/program/pbs-newshour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/pbs-newshour-full-show/id394432287?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/PBS-NewsHour---Full-Show-p425698/",
"rss": "https://www.pbs.org/newshour/feeds/rss/podcasts/show"
}
},
"perspectives": {
"id": "perspectives",
"title": "Perspectives",
"tagline": "KQED's series of daily listener commentaries since 1991",
"info": "KQED's series of daily listener commentaries since 1991.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Perspectives_Tile_Final.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Perspectives",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/perspectives/",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 14
},
"link": "/perspectives",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/id73801135",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/432309616/perspectives",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/perspectives/category/perspectives/feed/",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly93dzIua3FlZC5vcmcvcGVyc3BlY3RpdmVzL2NhdGVnb3J5L3BlcnNwZWN0aXZlcy9mZWVkLw"
}
},
"planet-money": {
"id": "planet-money",
"title": "Planet Money",
"info": "The economy explained. Imagine you could call up a friend and say, Meet me at the bar and tell me what's going on with the economy. Now imagine that's actually a fun evening.",
"airtime": "SUN 3pm-4pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/planetmoney.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/sections/money/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/planet-money",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/M4f5",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/planet-money/id290783428?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/Business--Economics-Podcasts/Planet-Money-p164680/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510289/podcast.xml"
}
},
"politicalbreakdown": {
"id": "politicalbreakdown",
"title": "Political Breakdown",
"tagline": "Politics from a personal perspective",
"info": "Political Breakdown is a new series that explores the political intersection of California and the nation. Each week hosts Scott Shafer and Marisa Lagos are joined with a new special guest to unpack politics -- with personality — and offer an insider’s glimpse at how politics happens.",
"airtime": "THU 6:30pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Political-Breakdown-2024-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Political Breakdown",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/politicalbreakdown",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 5
},
"link": "/podcasts/politicalbreakdown",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/political-breakdown/id1327641087",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/e0c2d153-ad36-4c8d-901d-f1da6a724824/political-breakdown",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/572155894/political-breakdown",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/political-breakdown",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/07RVyIjIdk2WDuVehvBMoN",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/tag/political-breakdown/feed/podcast"
}
},
"possible": {
"id": "possible",
"title": "Possible",
"info": "Possible is hosted by entrepreneur Reid Hoffman and writer Aria Finger. Together in Possible, Hoffman and Finger lead enlightening discussions about building a brighter collective future. The show features interviews with visionary guests like Trevor Noah, Sam Altman and Janette Sadik-Khan. Possible paints an optimistic portrait of the world we can create through science, policy, business, art and our shared humanity. It asks: What if everything goes right for once? How can we get there? Each episode also includes a short fiction story generated by advanced AI GPT-4, serving as a thought-provoking springboard to speculate how humanity could leverage technology for good.",
"airtime": "SUN 2pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Possible-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.possible.fm/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "Possible"
},
"link": "/radio/program/possible",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/possible/id1677184070",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/730YpdUSNlMyPQwNnyjp4k"
}
},
"pri-the-world": {
"id": "pri-the-world",
"title": "PRI's The World: Latest Edition",
"info": "Each weekday, host Marco Werman and his team of producers bring you the world's most interesting stories in an hour of radio that reminds us just how small our planet really is.",
"airtime": "MON-FRI 2pm-3pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-World-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.pri.org/programs/the-world",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "PRI"
},
"link": "/radio/program/pri-the-world",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/pris-the-world-latest-edition/id278196007?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/News--Politics-Podcasts/PRIs-The-World-p24/",
"rss": "http://feeds.feedburner.com/pri/theworld"
}
},
"radiolab": {
"id": "radiolab",
"title": "Radiolab",
"info": "A two-time Peabody Award-winner, Radiolab is an investigation told through sounds and stories, and centered around one big idea. In the Radiolab world, information sounds like music and science and culture collide. Hosted by Jad Abumrad and Robert Krulwich, the show is designed for listeners who demand skepticism, but appreciate wonder. WNYC Studios is the producer of other leading podcasts including Freakonomics Radio, Death, Sex & Money, On the Media and many more.",
"airtime": "SUN 12am-1am, SAT 2pm-3pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/radiolab1400.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/radiolab/",
"meta": {
"site": "science",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/radiolab",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/radiolab/id152249110?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/RadioLab-p68032/",
"rss": "https://feeds.wnyc.org/radiolab"
}
},
"reveal": {
"id": "reveal",
"title": "Reveal",
"info": "Created by The Center for Investigative Reporting and PRX, Reveal is public radios first one-hour weekly radio show and podcast dedicated to investigative reporting. Credible, fact based and without a partisan agenda, Reveal combines the power and artistry of driveway moment storytelling with data-rich reporting on critically important issues. The result is stories that inform and inspire, arming our listeners with information to right injustices, hold the powerful accountable and improve lives.Reveal is hosted by Al Letson and showcases the award-winning work of CIR and newsrooms large and small across the nation. In a radio and podcast market crowded with choices, Reveal focuses on important and often surprising stories that illuminate the world for our listeners.",
"airtime": "SAT 4pm-5pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/reveal300px.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.revealnews.org/episodes/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/reveal",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/reveal/id886009669",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Reveal-p679597/",
"rss": "http://feeds.revealradio.org/revealpodcast"
}
},
"rightnowish": {
"id": "rightnowish",
"title": "Rightnowish",
"tagline": "Art is where you find it",
"info": "Rightnowish digs into life in the Bay Area right now… ish. Journalist Pendarvis Harshaw takes us to galleries painted on the sides of liquor stores in West Oakland. We'll dance in warehouses in the Bayview, make smoothies with kids in South Berkeley, and listen to classical music in a 1984 Cutlass Supreme in Richmond. Every week, Pen talks to movers and shakers about how the Bay Area shapes what they create, and how they shape the place we call home.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Rightnowish-Podcast-Tile-500x500-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Rightnowish with Pendarvis Harshaw",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/rightnowish",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 16
},
"link": "/podcasts/rightnowish",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/721590300/rightnowish",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/arts/programs/rightnowish/feed/podcast",
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/rightnowish/id1482187648",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/rightnowish",
"google": "https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5tZWdhcGhvbmUuZm0vS1FJTkMxMjU5MTY3NDc4",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/7kEJuafTzTVan7B78ttz1I"
}
},
"science-friday": {
"id": "science-friday",
"title": "Science Friday",
"info": "Science Friday is a weekly science talk show, broadcast live over public radio stations nationwide. Each week, the show focuses on science topics that are in the news and tries to bring an educated, balanced discussion to bear on the scientific issues at hand. Panels of expert guests join host Ira Flatow, a veteran science journalist, to discuss science and to take questions from listeners during the call-in portion of the program.",
"airtime": "FRI 11am-1pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Science-Friday-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/science-friday",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/science-friday",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=73329284&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Science-Friday-p394/",
"rss": "http://feeds.wnyc.org/science-friday"
}
},
"snap-judgment": {
"id": "snap-judgment",
"title": "Snap Judgment",
"tagline": "Real stories with killer beats",
"info": "The Snap Judgment radio show and podcast mixes real stories with killer beats to produce cinematic, dramatic radio. Snap's musical brand of storytelling dares listeners to see the world through the eyes of another. This is storytelling... with a BEAT!! Snap first aired on public radio stations nationwide in July 2010. Today, Snap Judgment airs on over 450 public radio stations and is brought to the airwaves by KQED & PRX.",
"airtime": "SAT 1pm-2pm, 9pm-10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/Snap-Judgment-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Snap Judgment",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://snapjudgment.org",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 4
},
"link": "https://snapjudgment.org",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/snap-judgment/id283657561",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/449018144/snap-judgment",
"stitcher": "https://www.pandora.com/podcast/snap-judgment/PC:241?source=stitcher-sunset",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3Cct7ZWmxHNAtLgBTqjC5v",
"rss": "https://snap.feed.snapjudgment.org/"
}
},
"soldout": {
"id": "soldout",
"title": "SOLD OUT: Rethinking Housing in America",
"tagline": "A new future for housing",
"info": "Sold Out: Rethinking Housing in America",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Sold-Out-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Sold Out: Rethinking Housing in America",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/soldout",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 13
},
"link": "/podcasts/soldout",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/911586047/s-o-l-d-o-u-t-a-new-future-for-housing",
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/introducing-sold-out-rethinking-housing-in-america/id1531354937",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/soldout",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/38dTBSk2ISFoPiyYNoKn1X",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/sold-out-rethinking-housing-in-america",
"tunein": "https://tunein.com/radio/SOLD-OUT-Rethinking-Housing-in-America-p1365871/"
}
},
"spooked": {
"id": "spooked",
"title": "Spooked",
"tagline": "True-life supernatural stories",
"info": "",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/Spooked-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED Spooked",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://spookedpodcast.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 7
},
"link": "https://spookedpodcast.org/",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/spooked/id1279361017",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/549547848/snap-judgment-presents-spooked",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/76571Rfl3m7PLJQZKQIGCT",
"rss": "https://feeds.simplecast.com/TBotaapn"
}
},
"tech-nation": {
"id": "tech-nation",
"title": "Tech Nation Radio Podcast",
"info": "Tech Nation is a weekly public radio program, hosted by Dr. Moira Gunn. Founded in 1993, it has grown from a simple interview show to a multi-faceted production, featuring conversations with noted technology and science leaders, and a weekly science and technology-related commentary.",
"airtime": "FRI 10pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Tech-Nation-Radio-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "http://technation.podomatic.com/",
"meta": {
"site": "science",
"source": "Tech Nation Media"
},
"link": "/radio/program/tech-nation",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://technation.podomatic.com/rss2.xml"
}
},
"ted-radio-hour": {
"id": "ted-radio-hour",
"title": "TED Radio Hour",
"info": "The TED Radio Hour is a journey through fascinating ideas, astonishing inventions, fresh approaches to old problems, and new ways to think and create.",
"airtime": "SUN 3pm-4pm, SAT 10pm-11pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/tedRadioHour.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/ted-radio-hour/?showDate=2018-06-22",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/ted-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/8vsS",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=523121474&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/TED-Radio-Hour-p418021/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/510298/podcast.xml"
}
},
"thebay": {
"id": "thebay",
"title": "The Bay",
"tagline": "Local news to keep you rooted",
"info": "Host Devin Katayama walks you through the biggest story of the day with reporters and newsmakers.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Bay-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Bay",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/thebay",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 2
},
"link": "/podcasts/thebay",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-bay/id1350043452",
"amazon": "https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/d800ea4c-7a2c-42f2-b861-edaf78a5db0b/the-bay",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/586725995/the-bay",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-bay",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/4BIKBKIujizLHlIlBNaAqQ",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC8259786327"
}
},
"thelatest": {
"id": "thelatest",
"title": "The Latest",
"tagline": "Trusted local news in real time",
"info": "",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/The-Latest-2025-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Latest",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/thelatest",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 6
},
"link": "/thelatest",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-latest-from-kqed/id1197721799",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/1257949365/the-latest-from-k-q-e-d",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/5KIIXMgM9GTi5AepwOYvIZ?si=bd3053fec7244dba",
"rss": "https://feeds.megaphone.fm/KQINC9137121918"
}
},
"theleap": {
"id": "theleap",
"title": "The Leap",
"tagline": "What if you closed your eyes, and jumped?",
"info": "Stories about people making dramatic, risky changes, told by award-winning public radio reporter Judy Campbell.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Leap-Podcast-Tile-703x703-1.jpg",
"imageAlt": "KQED The Leap",
"officialWebsiteLink": "/podcasts/theleap",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "kqed",
"order": 17
},
"link": "/podcasts/theleap",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/the-leap/id1046668171",
"npr": "https://www.npr.org/podcasts/447248267/the-leap",
"stitcher": "https://www.stitcher.com/podcast/kqed/the-leap",
"spotify": "https://open.spotify.com/show/3sSlVHHzU0ytLwuGs1SD1U",
"rss": "https://ww2.kqed.org/news/programs/the-leap/feed/podcast"
}
},
"the-moth-radio-hour": {
"id": "the-moth-radio-hour",
"title": "The Moth Radio Hour",
"info": "Since its launch in 1997, The Moth has presented thousands of true stories, told live and without notes, to standing-room-only crowds worldwide. Moth storytellers stand alone, under a spotlight, with only a microphone and a roomful of strangers. The storyteller and the audience embark on a high-wire act of shared experience which is both terrifying and exhilarating. Since 2008, The Moth podcast has featured many of our favorite stories told live on Moth stages around the country. For information on all of our programs and live events, visit themoth.org.",
"airtime": "SAT 8pm-9pm and SUN 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/theMoth.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://themoth.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "prx"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-moth-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/the-moth-podcast/id275699983?mt=2",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/The-Moth-p273888/",
"rss": "http://feeds.themoth.org/themothpodcast"
}
},
"the-new-yorker-radio-hour": {
"id": "the-new-yorker-radio-hour",
"title": "The New Yorker Radio Hour",
"info": "The New Yorker Radio Hour is a weekly program presented by the magazine's editor, David Remnick, and produced by WNYC Studios and The New Yorker. Each episode features a diverse mix of interviews, profiles, storytelling, and an occasional burst of humor inspired by the magazine, and shaped by its writers, artists, and editors. This isn't a radio version of a magazine, but something all its own, reflecting the rich possibilities of audio storytelling and conversation. Theme music for the show was composed and performed by Merrill Garbus of tUnE-YArDs.",
"airtime": "SAT 10am-11am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-New-Yorker-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.wnycstudios.org/shows/tnyradiohour",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "WNYC"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-new-yorker-radio-hour",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/us/podcast/id1050430296",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/podcasts/WNYC-Podcasts/New-Yorker-Radio-Hour-p803804/",
"rss": "https://feeds.feedburner.com/newyorkerradiohour"
}
},
"the-sam-sanders-show": {
"id": "the-sam-sanders-show",
"title": "The Sam Sanders Show",
"info": "One of public radio's most dynamic voices, Sam Sanders helped launch The NPR Politics Podcast and hosted NPR's hit show It's Been A Minute. Now, the award-winning host returns with something brand new, The Sam Sanders Show. Every week, Sam Sanders and friends dig into the culture that shapes our lives: what's driving the biggest trends, how artists really think, and even the memes you can't stop scrolling past. Sam is beloved for his way of unpacking the world and bringing you up close to fresh currents and engaging conversations. The Sam Sanders Show is smart, funny and always a good time.",
"airtime": "FRI 12-1pm AND SAT 11am-12pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/The-Sam-Sanders-Show-Podcast-Tile-400x400-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.kcrw.com/shows/the-sam-sanders-show/latest",
"meta": {
"site": "arts",
"source": "KCRW"
},
"link": "https://www.kcrw.com/shows/the-sam-sanders-show/latest",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://feed.cdnstream1.com/zjb/feed/download/ac/28/59/ac28594c-e1d0-4231-8728-61865cdc80e8.xml"
}
},
"the-splendid-table": {
"id": "the-splendid-table",
"title": "The Splendid Table",
"info": "\u003cem>The Splendid Table\u003c/em> hosts our nation's conversations about cooking, sustainability and food culture.",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/The-Splendid-Table-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.splendidtable.org/",
"airtime": "SUN 10-11 pm",
"meta": {
"site": "radio",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/the-splendid-table"
},
"this-american-life": {
"id": "this-american-life",
"title": "This American Life",
"info": "This American Life is a weekly public radio show, heard by 2.2 million people on more than 500 stations. Another 2.5 million people download the weekly podcast. It is hosted by Ira Glass, produced in collaboration with Chicago Public Media, delivered to stations by PRX The Public Radio Exchange, and has won all of the major broadcasting awards.",
"airtime": "SAT 12pm-1pm, 7pm-8pm",
"imageSrc": "https://ww2.kqed.org/radio/wp-content/uploads/sites/50/2018/04/thisAmericanLife.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.thisamericanlife.org/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "wbez"
},
"link": "/radio/program/this-american-life",
"subscribe": {
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=201671138&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"rss": "https://www.thisamericanlife.org/podcast/rss.xml"
}
},
"tinydeskradio": {
"id": "tinydeskradio",
"title": "Tiny Desk Radio",
"info": "We're bringing the best of Tiny Desk to the airwaves, only on public radio.",
"airtime": "SUN 8pm and SAT 9pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/300x300-For-Member-Station-Logo-Tiny-Desk-Radio-@2x.png",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/series/g-s1-52030/tiny-desk-radio",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/tinydeskradio",
"subscribe": {
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/g-s1-52030/rss.xml"
}
},
"wait-wait-dont-tell-me": {
"id": "wait-wait-dont-tell-me",
"title": "Wait Wait... Don't Tell Me!",
"info": "Peter Sagal and Bill Kurtis host the weekly NPR News quiz show alongside some of the best and brightest news and entertainment personalities.",
"airtime": "SUN 10am-11am, SAT 11am-12pm, SAT 6pm-7pm",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Wait-Wait-Podcast-Tile-300x300-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/wait-wait-dont-tell-me/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/wait-wait-dont-tell-me",
"subscribe": {
"npr": "https://rpb3r.app.goo.gl/Xogv",
"apple": "https://itunes.apple.com/WebObjects/MZStore.woa/wa/viewPodcast?s=143441&mt=2&id=121493804&at=11l79Y&ct=nprdirectory",
"tuneIn": "https://tunein.com/radio/Wait-Wait-Dont-Tell-Me-p46/",
"rss": "https://feeds.npr.org/344098539/podcast.xml"
}
},
"weekend-edition-saturday": {
"id": "weekend-edition-saturday",
"title": "Weekend Edition Saturday",
"info": "Weekend Edition Saturday wraps up the week's news and offers a mix of analysis and features on a wide range of topics, including arts, sports, entertainment, and human interest stories. The two-hour program is hosted by NPR's Peabody Award-winning Scott Simon.",
"airtime": "SAT 5am-10am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Weekend-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/weekend-edition-saturday/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/weekend-edition-saturday"
},
"weekend-edition-sunday": {
"id": "weekend-edition-sunday",
"title": "Weekend Edition Sunday",
"info": "Weekend Edition Sunday features interviews with newsmakers, artists, scientists, politicians, musicians, writers, theologians and historians. The program has covered news events from Nelson Mandela's 1990 release from a South African prison to the capture of Saddam Hussein.",
"airtime": "SUN 5am-10am",
"imageSrc": "https://cdn.kqed.org/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/Weekend-Edition-Podcast-Tile-360x360-1.jpg",
"officialWebsiteLink": "https://www.npr.org/programs/weekend-edition-sunday/",
"meta": {
"site": "news",
"source": "npr"
},
"link": "/radio/program/weekend-edition-sunday"
}
},
"racesReducer": {},
"racesGenElectionReducer": {},
"racesGenElection2026Reducer": {},
"radioSchedulesReducer": {},
"listsReducer": {
"posts/news?category=transportation": {
"isFetching": false,
"latestQuery": {
"from": 1800,
"size": 12
},
"vitalsOnly": false,
"totalRequested": 12,
"isLoading": false,
"isLoadingMore": true,
"total": {
"value": 1930,
"relation": "eq"
},
"items": [
"news_51954",
"news_51225",
"news_50031",
"news_49866",
"news_49649",
"news_49093",
"news_48887",
"news_48612",
"news_47687",
"news_47610",
"news_47143",
"news_46987"
],
"complete": true
}
},
"recallGuideReducer": {
"intros": {},
"policy": {},
"candidates": {}
},
"savedArticleReducer": {
"articles": [],
"status": {}
},
"newslettersReducer": {
"isFetching": false,
"fetchFailed": false,
"hasFetched": false,
"newsletters": {},
"isSubscribing": false,
"isUnsubscribing": false,
"subscribedNewsletters": {}
},
"termsReducer": {
"about": {
"name": "About",
"type": "terms",
"id": "about",
"slug": "about",
"link": "/about",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"arts": {
"name": "Arts & Culture",
"grouping": [
"arts",
"pop",
"trulyca"
],
"description": "KQED Arts provides daily in-depth coverage of the Bay Area's music, art, film, performing arts, literature and arts news, as well as cultural commentary and criticism.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "arts",
"slug": "arts",
"link": "/arts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"artschool": {
"name": "Art School",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "artschool",
"slug": "artschool",
"link": "/artschool",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"bayareabites": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "bayareabites",
"slug": "bayareabites",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"bayareahiphop": {
"name": "Bay Area Hiphop",
"type": "terms",
"id": "bayareahiphop",
"slug": "bayareahiphop",
"link": "/bayareahiphop",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"campaign21": {
"name": "Campaign 21",
"type": "terms",
"id": "campaign21",
"slug": "campaign21",
"link": "/campaign21",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"careers": {
"name": "Careers",
"type": "terms",
"id": "careers",
"slug": "careers",
"link": "/careers",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"checkplease": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "checkplease",
"slug": "checkplease",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"education": {
"name": "Education",
"grouping": [
"education"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "education",
"slug": "education",
"link": "/education",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"elections": {
"name": "Elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "elections",
"slug": "elections",
"link": "/elections",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"events": {
"name": "Events",
"type": "terms",
"id": "events",
"slug": "events",
"link": "/events",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"event": {
"name": "Event",
"alias": "events",
"type": "terms",
"id": "event",
"slug": "event",
"link": "/event",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"filmschoolshorts": {
"name": "Film School Shorts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "filmschoolshorts",
"slug": "filmschoolshorts",
"link": "/filmschoolshorts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"food": {
"name": "KQED food",
"grouping": [
"food",
"bayareabites",
"checkplease"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "food",
"slug": "food",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"forum": {
"name": "Forum",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/forum?",
"parent": "news",
"type": "terms",
"id": "forum",
"slug": "forum",
"link": "/forum",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"futureofyou": {
"name": "Future of You",
"grouping": [
"science",
"futureofyou"
],
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "futureofyou",
"slug": "futureofyou",
"link": "/futureofyou",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"jpepinheart": {
"name": "KQED food",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/food,bayareabites,checkplease",
"parent": "food",
"type": "terms",
"id": "jpepinheart",
"slug": "jpepinheart",
"link": "/food",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"liveblog": {
"name": "Live Blog",
"type": "terms",
"id": "liveblog",
"slug": "liveblog",
"link": "/liveblog",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"livetv": {
"name": "Live TV",
"parent": "tv",
"type": "terms",
"id": "livetv",
"slug": "livetv",
"link": "/livetv",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"lowdown": {
"name": "The Lowdown",
"relatedContentQuery": "posts/lowdown?",
"parent": "news",
"type": "terms",
"id": "lowdown",
"slug": "lowdown",
"link": "/lowdown",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"mindshift": {
"name": "Mindshift",
"parent": "news",
"description": "MindShift explores the future of education by highlighting the innovative – and sometimes counterintuitive – ways educators and parents are helping all children succeed.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "mindshift",
"slug": "mindshift",
"link": "/mindshift",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"news": {
"name": "News",
"grouping": [
"news",
"forum"
],
"type": "terms",
"id": "news",
"slug": "news",
"link": "/news",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"newsletters": {
"name": "newsletters",
"type": "terms",
"id": "newsletters",
"slug": "newsletters",
"link": "/newsletters",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"perspectives": {
"name": "Perspectives",
"parent": "radio",
"type": "terms",
"id": "perspectives",
"slug": "perspectives",
"link": "/perspectives",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"podcasts": {
"name": "Podcasts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "podcasts",
"slug": "podcasts",
"link": "/podcasts",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"pop": {
"name": "Pop",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "pop",
"slug": "pop",
"link": "/pop",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"pressroom": {
"name": "Pressroom",
"type": "terms",
"id": "pressroom",
"slug": "pressroom",
"link": "/pressroom",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"quest": {
"name": "Quest",
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "quest",
"slug": "quest",
"link": "/quest",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"radio": {
"name": "Radio",
"grouping": [
"forum",
"perspectives"
],
"description": "Listen to KQED Public Radio – home of Forum and The California Report – on 88.5 FM in San Francisco, 89.3 FM in Sacramento, 88.3 FM in Santa Rosa and 88.1 FM in Martinez.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "radio",
"slug": "radio",
"link": "/radio",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"root": {
"name": "KQED",
"image": "https://ww2.kqed.org/app/uploads/2020/02/KQED-OG-Image@1x.png",
"imageWidth": 1200,
"imageHeight": 630,
"headData": {
"title": "KQED | News, Radio, Podcasts, TV | Public Media for Northern California",
"description": "KQED provides public radio, television, and independent reporting on issues that matter to the Bay Area. We’re the NPR and PBS member station for Northern California."
},
"type": "terms",
"id": "root",
"slug": "root",
"link": "/root",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"science": {
"name": "Science",
"grouping": [
"science",
"futureofyou"
],
"description": "KQED Science brings you award-winning science and environment coverage from the Bay Area and beyond.",
"type": "terms",
"id": "science",
"slug": "science",
"link": "/science",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"stateofhealth": {
"name": "State of Health",
"parent": "science",
"type": "terms",
"id": "stateofhealth",
"slug": "stateofhealth",
"link": "/stateofhealth",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"support": {
"name": "Support",
"type": "terms",
"id": "support",
"slug": "support",
"link": "/support",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"thedolist": {
"name": "The Do List",
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "thedolist",
"slug": "thedolist",
"link": "/thedolist",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"trulyca": {
"name": "Truly CA",
"grouping": [
"arts",
"pop",
"trulyca"
],
"parent": "arts",
"type": "terms",
"id": "trulyca",
"slug": "trulyca",
"link": "/trulyca",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"tv": {
"name": "TV",
"type": "terms",
"id": "tv",
"slug": "tv",
"link": "/tv",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"voterguide": {
"name": "Voter Guide",
"parent": "elections",
"alias": "elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "voterguide",
"slug": "voterguide",
"link": "/voterguide",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"guiaelectoral": {
"name": "Guia Electoral",
"parent": "elections",
"alias": "elections",
"type": "terms",
"id": "guiaelectoral",
"slug": "guiaelectoral",
"link": "/guiaelectoral",
"taxonomy": "site"
},
"news_category_transportation": {
"isLoading": true
},
"news_1397": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1397",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1397",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Transportation",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Transportation Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1409,
"slug": "transportation",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/transportation"
},
"news_6944": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_6944",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "6944",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": "https://ww2.kqed.org/app/uploads/sites/10/2014/10/News-Fix-Logo-Web-Banners-04.png",
"name": "News Fix",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "program",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": "The News Fix is a daily news podcast from KQED that breaks down the latest headlines and provides in-depth analysis of the stories that matter to the Bay Area.",
"title": "News Fix - Daily Dose of Bay Area News | KQED",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 6968,
"slug": "news-fix",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/program/news-fix"
},
"news_19906": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_19906",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "19906",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Environment",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Environment Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 19923,
"slug": "environment",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/environment"
},
"news_2192": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2192",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2192",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "fog",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "fog Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2207,
"slug": "fog",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/fog"
},
"news_8": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_8",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "8",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "News",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "News Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 8,
"slug": "news",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/news"
},
"news_19904": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_19904",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "19904",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"name": "Labor",
"slug": "labor",
"taxonomy": "tag",
"description": null,
"featImg": null,
"headData": {
"title": "Labor | KQED News",
"description": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogDescription": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"twDescription": null,
"twImgId": null
},
"ttid": 19921,
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/labor"
},
"news_2083": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2083",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2083",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Occupy",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Occupy Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2098,
"slug": "occupy",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/occupy"
},
"news_1963": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1963",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1963",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Occupy Oakland",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Occupy Oakland Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1978,
"slug": "occupy-oakland",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/occupy-oakland"
},
"news_854": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_854",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "854",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Poverty Issues",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Poverty Issues Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 864,
"slug": "poverty-issues",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/poverty-issues"
},
"news_5703": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_5703",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "5703",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "poverty issues",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "poverty issues Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 5727,
"slug": "poverty-issues-2",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/poverty-issues-2"
},
"news_18540": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_18540",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "18540",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Education",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Education Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2595,
"slug": "education",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/education"
},
"news_309": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_309",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "309",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "high-speed rail",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "high-speed rail Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 317,
"slug": "high-speed-rail",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/high-speed-rail"
},
"news_2127": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2127",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2127",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Richard White",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Richard White Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2142,
"slug": "richard-white",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/richard-white"
},
"news_178": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_178",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "178",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Stanford",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Stanford Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 185,
"slug": "stanford",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/stanford"
},
"news_231": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_231",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "231",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Bay Bridge",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Bay Bridge Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 239,
"slug": "bay-bridge",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/bay-bridge"
},
"news_20517": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_20517",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "20517",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "transportation",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "transportation Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 20534,
"slug": "transportation",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/transportation"
},
"news_38": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_38",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "38",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "San Francisco",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "San Francisco Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 58,
"slug": "san-francisco",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/san-francisco"
},
"news_6188": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_6188",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "6188",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Law and Justice",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "category",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Law and Justice Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 6212,
"slug": "law-and-justice",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/category/law-and-justice"
},
"news_1782": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1782",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1782",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Anonymous",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Anonymous Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1797,
"slug": "anonymous",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/anonymous"
},
"news_1683": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_1683",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "1683",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Charles Hill",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Charles Hill Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 1695,
"slug": "charles-hill",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/charles-hill"
},
"news_686": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_686",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "686",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Human Rights",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Human Rights Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 695,
"slug": "human-rights",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/human-rights"
},
"news_2071": {
"type": "terms",
"id": "news_2071",
"meta": {
"index": "terms_1716263798",
"site": "news",
"id": "2071",
"found": true
},
"relationships": {},
"featImg": null,
"name": "Linton Johnson BART",
"description": null,
"taxonomy": "tag",
"headData": {
"twImgId": null,
"twTitle": null,
"ogTitle": null,
"ogImgId": null,
"twDescription": null,
"description": null,
"title": "Linton Johnson BART Archives | KQED News",
"ogDescription": null
},
"ttid": 2086,
"slug": "linton-johnson-bart",
"isLoading": false,
"link": "/news/tag/linton-johnson-bart"
}
},
"userPermissionsReducer": {
"wpLoggedIn": false
},
"eventsReducer": {},
"fssReducer": {},
"tvDailyScheduleReducer": {},
"tvWeeklyScheduleReducer": {},
"tvPrimetimeScheduleReducer": {},
"tvMonthlyScheduleReducer": {},
"userAccountReducer": {
"user": {
"email": null,
"emailStatus": "EMAIL_UNVALIDATED",
"loggedStatus": "LOGGED_OUT",
"loggingChecked": false,
"articles": [],
"firstName": null,
"lastName": null,
"phoneNumber": null,
"fetchingMembership": false,
"membershipError": false,
"memberships": [
{
"id": null,
"startDate": null,
"firstName": null,
"lastName": null,
"familyNumber": null,
"memberNumber": null,
"memberSince": null,
"expirationDate": null,
"pfsEligible": false,
"isSustaining": false,
"membershipLevel": "Prospect",
"membershipStatus": "Non Member",
"lastGiftDate": null,
"renewalDate": null,
"lastDonationAmount": null
}
]
},
"authModal": {
"isOpen": false,
"view": "LANDING_VIEW"
},
"error": null
},
"youthMediaReducer": {},
"checkPleaseReducer": {
"filterData": {
"region": {
"key": "Restaurant Region",
"filters": [
"Any Region"
]
},
"cuisine": {
"key": "Restaurant Cuisine",
"filters": [
"Any Cuisine"
]
}
},
"restaurantDataById": {},
"restaurantIdsSorted": [],
"error": null
},
"userAgentReducer": {
"userAgent": "Mozilla/5.0 AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko; compatible; ClaudeBot/1.0; +claudebot@anthropic.com)",
"isBot": true
}
}
