Homebuyer bond. Passes with majority vote.
58.41% of votes countedAssociated PressThis percentage is an Associated Press estimate of how much of the vote in an election has been counted. It is informed by turnout in recent elections, details on votes cast in advance and – after polls close – early returns. The estimate may fluctuate as election officials report additional results and AP learns more about how many voters have cast a ballot.
The Middle Class Homeownership and Family Home Construction Act of 2026 would create a down-payment assistance program for families earning up to 200% of an area’s median income — the midpoint of family incomes in a specific area — adjusted for household size. This assistance could only be used to buy newly constructed homes. The bond would be repaid through the mortgages of participating homebuyers.
Yes Argument
For many Californians, the biggest barrier to buying a home is the down payment. This measure is designed for the “missing middle” — working families who earn too much for most other down-payment assistance programs but still cannot save enough to buy a home. Proposition 37 reduces the required down payment to just 3%.
No Argument
Proposition 37 provides taxpayer-funded subsidies to developers without reforming costly mandates that make housing expensive. Worse, Proposition 37 makes the state of California one of the biggest mortgage lenders in America overnight — and taxpayers are left holding the bag.
Key Supporters
In Support
- Xavier Becerra, candidate for California governor
- California Association of Realtors
- California Teachers Association
- Veterans Affiliated Council
In Opposition
- Carl DeMaio, California Assembly member
FundraisingCampaign finance data comes from the California Secretary of State’s office or the Federal Election Commission.
Source: California Secretary of State
More Statewide Propositions
Should California issue $11.25 billion in general obligation bonds for affordable housing, homebuying opportunities and veterans and homelessness programs?
Should state and local governments have the option to provide public funding for election campaigns?
Should successor elections be eliminated from recall elections of state officials?
Should California issue $8.4 billion in bonds to fund immunology and immunotherapy research?
Should California tax the wealth of billionaires to fund health care services?
Should California require ongoing audits of programs funded by specific taxes, and make those tax revenues subject to the state’s spending limit?
Should the state prohibit new taxes on financial assets like stocks and investment accounts and prohibit most retroactive taxes?
Should local tax measures placed on the ballot by voter signature face a higher threshold if the tax will be used for a specific purpose?
Should certain nonprofit community health clinics be required to spend at least 90% of their revenue on healthcare services?
Should California speed up its environmental review process for certain projects?