This measure would require ongoing audits of state programs that are funded by “special” taxes — those earmarked for a specific purpose. It also would make any new special taxes subject to the state’s existing spending limit. Proposition 41 was written to invalidate the proposed billionaire wealth tax, Proposition 40, because that measure exempts its revenue from the state spending limit. If both measures pass but Proposition 41 receives more votes, Proposition 40 could be nullified.
Yes Argument
Proposition 41 will make state government more transparent and accountable, ensuring that taxpayer money is being spent on programs that actually work. California’s budget has surged in recent years, yet there’s little to show for that increased spending. New taxes should comply with the state’s existing spending limit, which voters approved decades ago.
No Argument
Proposition 41 is the billionaires’ attempt to avoid a new wealth tax. It’s disguised as an accountability measure but is really aimed at tricking voters into canceling Proposition 40. It will cost taxpayers money by requiring audits.
Key Supporters
In Support
- Sergey Brin, co-founder, Google
- California Chamber of Commerce
- California Taxpayers Association
In Opposition
- California Democratic Party
- California Federation of Labor Unions
- SEIU-UHW West
More Statewide Propositions
Should California issue $11.25 billion in general obligation bonds for affordable housing, homebuying opportunities and veterans and homelessness programs?
Should state and local governments have the option to provide public funding for election campaigns?
Should successor elections be eliminated from recall elections of state officials?
Should California issue $25 billion in revenue bonds to create a “middle-class” homebuyer downpayment assistance program?
Should California issue $8.4 billion in bonds to fund immunology and immunotherapy research?
Should California tax the wealth of billionaires to fund health care services?
Should the state prohibit new taxes on financial assets like stocks and investment accounts and prohibit most retroactive taxes?
Should local tax measures placed on the ballot by voter signature face a higher threshold if the tax will be used for a specific purpose?
Should certain nonprofit community health clinics be required to spend at least 90% of their revenue on healthcare services?
Should California speed up its environmental review process for certain projects?