upper waypoint

Judge Permanently Blocks Trump Sanctuary Cities Order

Save ArticleSave Article
Failed to save article

Please try again

U.S. President Trump displays one of the two executive orders on immigration he signed during a visit to the Department of Homeland Security in January.  ( Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images)

A federal judge on Monday permanently blocked President Trump's executive order to cut funding from cities that limit cooperation with U.S. immigration authorities.

U.S. District Court Judge William Orrick rejected the administration's argument that the executive order applies only to a relatively small pot of money and said Trump cannot set new conditions on spending approved by Congress.

The judge had previously made the same arguments in a ruling that put a temporary hold on the executive order targeting so-called sanctuary cities. The Trump administration has appealed that decision to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

"The District Court exceeded its authority today when it barred the President from instructing his cabinet members to enforce existing law," said Department of Justice spokesman Devin O'Malley in a statement late Monday. "The Justice Department will vindicate the President's lawful authority to direct the executive branch."

Orrick's ruling came in lawsuits brought by two California counties, San Francisco and Santa Clara.

Sponsored

San Francisco City Attorney Dennis Herrera said the ruling was "a victory for the American people and the rule of law."

"President Trump might be able to tweet whatever comes to mind, but he can't grant himself new authority because he feels like it," he said in a statement.

A lawyer for the DOJ argued during a hearing before Orrick in April that the executive order applied to only a few grants that would affect less than $1 million for Santa Clara County and possibly no money for San Francisco.

But the judge disagreed, saying in his rulings that the order was written broadly to "reach all federal grants" and potentially jeopardized hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to San Francisco and Santa Clara.

He cited comments by the president and Attorney General Jeff Sessions as evidence that the order was intended to target a wide array of federal funding. And he said the president himself had called it a "weapon" to use against recalcitrant cities.

The Trump administration separately has also moved to withhold one particular law enforcement grant from sanctuary cities, prompting a new round of lawsuits that are still pending.

lower waypoint
next waypoint
Should Kids Learn Financial Literacy in School? California Voters May DecideGaza War Ceasefire Talks Continue as Israel Threatens Rafah InvasionWill the U.S. Really Ban TikTok?Grooblen: 'Egg Freeze'Inheriting a Home in California? Here's What You Need to KnowCongressional Recount Drama and Questions About Campus ProtestsCalifornia Forever Shells out $2M in Campaign to Build City from ScratchThe Night the Dumbarton Rail Bridge Went Up in FlamesBuying and Selling a Home in California Is About to Change: Here's HowBerkeley Perfumer Mandy Aftel on the 'Curious and Wondrous World of Fragrance'