To get those costs down, the administration said it proposes cutting regulations and “compliance-driven activities,” according to a press release. Similarly, they are shifting decisions about several standards — such as student-teacher ratios, education requirements, background checks and transportation practices — back to states.
Childcare providers are not sold on the proposal.
“If we look at the previous actions of the administration, what they have done is not in favor of expanding the program,” said Yvette Sanchez Fuentes, senior vice president with Start Early, an Illinois-based Head Start partner.
“Is it enough to just bring kids in the door if we’re not actually giving kids and families what they need?”
Sanchez Fuentes said administrative costs are not only things like payroll and day-to-day operations, but also help fill gaps in care. “If you, for example, have children with disabilities you [can use] some of those funds to pay for additional special services or staff with specialties who could come in and support kids.”
The administration’s proposal also says parents are children’s primary teachers and seeks to bring in more parent opinions on “structure and curriculum” into the classrooms and emphasizes nutrition and exercise.
Loosening the standards
Head Start’s current standards are laid out in a detailed 133-page guide. The manual is used not only by the program’s centers, but also by many unaffiliated private childcare centers across the country.
These standards include safety guidelines, spell out who is eligible for Head Start and provide detailed rules — such as the requirement that kids in the program brush their teeth once daily with fluoride toothpaste.
Erica Phillips, the executive director for the National Association for Family Child Care, said about 10% of her members are Early Head Start childcare partners, while the rest are home-based providers around the country.
“The Head Start performance standards were a consistent … evidence-based set of standards,” she said. “It can be helpful to have a nationally recognized benchmark.”
Phillips said her organization will be on the lookout for variations across states. She said she worries “quality is now dependent on your ZIP code or on your geography.”
The Trump administration sees it differently.
“Flexibility is permission. It’s not a mandate,” Adams said. “The opportunity for these programs to make a different decision does not necessarily mean they must make a different decision.”
The changes did not come as a complete surprise: The conservative Heritage Foundation has long criticized the program, saying it “doesn’t work.” In Project 2025, the foundation’s policy blueprint that the Trump administration has taken many cues from, the message is clear — eliminate Head Start.
Advocates see what they characterize as the erosion of quality and decrease in standards as the first step in dismantling the program.
A long runway
Thursday’s announcement came in the form of a notice of proposed rulemaking, or NPRM. It kicks off a lengthy, formalized process of public comment and talks with stakeholders. It could be six months to a year before any new standards take effect.
“I just really want folks to know Head Start is open,” said Tommy Sheridan, deputy director at the National Head Start Association (NHSA), a nonprofit that advocates for the program. “The quality of Head Start children and families truly comes from the people that are running Head Start programs. Those folks are going to be the same. They’re going to be able to do that.”
The administration says the NPRM will be published in the Federal Register on Friday and be open to public comment for 60 days.
