NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft at Mercury-artist concept.

Photo by: NASA

I’ve been waiting for the “whole story” on Martian ice at the Phoenix lander site to unfold more completely, but the chemical analyses have not yet run their full courses-so I’ve decided to widen the focus on this blog to give a status report on current active robotic exploration of planets going on around the Solar System.

Limiting my scope to only planetary spacecraft, the list is still respectable. In no particular order, here’s the round-up:

Spirit: Mars Exploration Rover Spirit’s activities on the Martian surface have been reduced to save on power, but the robot remains alive. With the arrival of Martian winter, Spirit spends more power running heaters to keep key electronic and power equipment healthy. Spirit remains in the giant Gusev Crater, where it will spend its entire life on Mars.

Opportunity: Exploring a much smaller crater of its own, Victoria Crater-Spirit’s twin, Opportunity, continues its investigation of the rock layers of Mars’ geological history. As of June 10, Opportunity has clocked in at 7.26 miles of total “roving” on Mars, since its landing back in 2004.

Phoenix: The brand-spankin’-new Mars Phoenix lander has been digging into one of Mars’ greatest scientific mysteries: water. Detailed chemical analysis of samples taken at Phoenix’s site near the northern polar ice cap is underway, but the big question– is Phoenix standing on frozen Martian water– has been answered: yes.

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter: The newest orbiter in the Martian fleet continues to send back its extreme-high-resolution imagery and its revealing chemical measurements, as well as to serve as a high-speed data and communication relay for other Mars-exploring robots.

Mars 2001 Odyssey: Credited with detecting the massive amounts of frozen water in Mars’ northern hemisphere-the same ice that the Phoenix lander is now scraping at, Mars 2001 Odyssey continues its surveillance of Mars’ chemistry and atmosphere.

Mars Express: The European orbiter that launched the ill-fated Beagle II lander has continued on a respectable career of exploration in its own right. Mars Express also helped support the landing of the Phoenix.

Cassini: Saturn’s first robot-in-residence, Cassini, has concluded its initial 4-year mission and is now continuing on an extended mission. Cassini has given us unprecedented close-up images and measurements of many of Saturn’s stunning moons, its complicated ring system, and the swirling, aurora-touched cloud formations of Saturn itself.

MESSENGER: The first spacecraft to visit the little-understood Mercury since 1975 made its first flyby of that planet last January, and will settle into a permanent orbit in March 2011. Even the few pics it snapped as it hurled by gave us far more detailed images of Mercury than ever before.

New Horizons: Launched a couple years ago on its outward bound, meteoric flight to Pluto, New Horizons has already performed some exploration duty, capturing images and data of Jupiter, Jupiter’s volcanic moon Io, and Jupiter’s long magnetic “tail.” Now in “cruise mode,” this little robot will fly past Pluto (dwarf planet; king of the Plutoids) in July 2015.

Voyagers 1 and 2: Do you remember the remarkable voyages of discovery made by the Voyager spacecraft, both launched in 1977? Since completing their primary missions of flying by the Gas Giant planets (Voyager 1 at Jupiter and Saturn, Voyager 2 at all four), these two veterans have continued to operate and send information back to Earth, and are now about 3 times more distant from the Sun than Pluto.

That’s the wrap. If I missed anyone, my apologies!

A patch of what might be ice, exposed by Phoenix’s
landing rockets.So, did it land on ice? Huh? Did it?

Two blogs ago I wrote about the then upcoming landing of the Phoenix spacecraft on Mars, near the Northern polar ice cap (Probing the Martian Pole). The entire point of landing on Mars’ extreme northern plains was to find and examine ice-ice we know is up there in great abundance, as detected by orbiting spacecraft (Mars Odyssey 2001).

There, frozen under the surface dust layers, is a vast deposit of ice-”enough to fill Lake Michigan twice.” So Phoenix was sent to actually land there and scrape up surface samples of the soil, and hopefully ice. The question was, would the layer of dust covering the ice be thin enough for Phoenix to reach the ice with its robotic arm and shovel?

The landing occurred on May 25th-a successful landing. NASA broadcast the drama live on NASA TV, which we shared with several hundred Chabot visitors via planetarium, theater, and closed-circuit TV. There were no actual images coming from Phoenix during the landing-after all, it was cooped up in its protective shell for much of the descent-but the excitement of the real-time drama and the nervous faces of NASA/JPL were enough to enthrall our audience. Pictures wouldn’t come form Phoenix until later that night at the earliest.

But the pictures did come in over the days following. At first they looked much like images from other Mars landers (Viking, Pathfinder, Spirit, Opportunity), only flatter. Rusty red soil, low flat horizon, a scattering of pebbles and rocks. The landscape itself appeared less interesting to me than other landing sites-but if you measure Phoenix’s success by the beauty of the scenery, you’re missing the point.

Phoenix is pretty much all about the ice, and what chemicals are frozen and preserved in it. The questions asked by the Phoenix mission are: did life ever arise on Mars, is the current climate on Mars suitable to support life, and what is Mars’ geological makeup? If the vast ice deposits of the flat northern hemisphere lowlands are the frozen leftovers of what was once a liquid sea, then are there chemical clues of past conditions-even past life-locked up and preserved there?

So, do we have answers to these questions yet? Is there ice under Phoenix within reach of its scooper? At the time of my writing this the answer is: maybe. During the first week of testing Phoenix’s systems to get it ready for full-on prospecting, a picture of the ground underneath the lander was taken using the camera attached to the robotic arm. This picture revealed a patch of solid substance that seems to have been exposed by the blast of Phoenix’s landing rockets. It looks like it could be ice, but until a sample is analyzed we won’t know for sure (because, it could be solid rock, too).

The first sample scoop of soil dug up by Phoenix’s shovel was placed in a bucket on board the lander and examined by camera, before being carefully dumped into a designated sample waste location (Mars’ first land fill). The picture revealed some white substance in the reddish soil-which could be ice, or possible salt.…

Stay tuned in the coming days and weeks for hot news from the ice as Phoenix conducts its investigations in earnest.

Artistic rendition of exoplanet Gilese 436 b, created in Celestia
In the past fifteen years, the search for other Earths– and possibly life– outside our own solar system has taken off. As of May 2008, 293 extrasolar planets have been confirmed. Most of these planets are big, gas giants like our own Jupiter but new technology is helping astronomers get closer to finding earth sized planets. To find an extrasolar planet scientists first identify a star and then, using different methods, look to see if there is a planet, or planets, orbiting the star. It’s estimated that at least 10% of sun-like stars have planets.

Once astronomers have found an extrasolar planet, also called an exoplanet, they look to see if it is in the Goldilocks zone. This is an area of space in which a planet is just the right distance from its’ parent star so that the surface is neither too hot nor too cold. A habitable temperature means that the planet could possibly host liquid water, an ingredient for life.

A number of exoplanet findings have come from astronomy teams in Switzerland and near San Jose at Lick Observatory. Astronomers at Lick made news in the fall of 2007 when they discovered 55 Cancri. The discovery of the five-planet system came after nearly 20 years of observations. Also in 2007, astronomers with the Geneva Extrasolar Planet Search Program discovered the most earth-like planet ever found. Gilese 581 c lies in the Goldilocks Zone, it’s surface temperature ranges from an estimated 32 degrees Fahrenheit to 102 degrees Fahrenheit. The research team that discovered the new planet believes it may have a developed atmosphere and be covered with oceans.

Curious to see how astronomers hunt for extrasolar planets, I took the trip up the long, windy road to the top of Mt. Hamilton. It is a beautiful drive up to the observatory and it’s wise to take your time so that you can enjoy the ideal California landscape of rolling hills dotted with oak trees and wildflowers. The 365 sharp curves along the 19 mile road will also slow you down.

At the top of Mt. Hamilton are several white domes dotting the 4,200-foot crestline. From Lick Observatory you can see forever– not just across the vast northern California landscape but out into our own galaxy and beyond. By coincidence, the night I was there astronomer Debra Fischer confirmed five new planets outside our solar system. The discovery was the culmination of five years of watching these specific planets from Lick’s 3-meter Shane Telescope. Fischer and her colleague Geoff Marcy will publish their findings soon. These two astronomers are obsessed with looking for exoplanets, they just returned from the Andes mountains in Chile, where they spent day and night for several weeks hunting for planets. But Fischer and Marcy are not the only ones who have caught the exoplanet bug.

Scientists at NASA are nearly ready to launch a bus-sized telescope into space. NASA’s Kepler Telescope which will orbit our sun, will be trained on a hundred thousand stars at a time. It may be our best chance yet for finding new life in outer space. The telescope is scheduled to launch in February. Kepler will find planets by looking for tiny dips in the brightness of a star caused by planetary transits.

Make sure to check out our photo set on Flickr which includes: photos of Lick Observatory; the Kepler testbed at NASA Ames in Mountain View; the Kepler spacecraft assembly in Boulder, Colorado; and artists’ renditions of exoplanets discussed in this report.You can also hear our radio story on the search for exoplanets, watch the Planet Hunters TV story online and find additional links and resources.

Extreme close-up of the Sun’s visible surface,
showing ‘bubbling’ cells of convecting gas–each the size of
Northern California. credit: Hinode JAXA/NASA/PPARCBy all accounts, a new cycle-Cycle 24-in solar activity has begun… something you probably didn’t notice since the beginning of a solar cycle is quite subtle….

First things first: what is a solar cycle, and why is this one number 24? You’ve probably heard of sunspots and solar flares and disturbances in radio communications caused by solar activity, but had you noticed NOT hearing much about these things in the last two or three years?

The Sun exhibits a cyclic rise and fall in its level of magnetic activity. Being an enormous ball of roiling, circulating plasma (electrically charged gas), the Sun generates powerful magnetic fields in a way similar to how the circulating electricity in an electromagnet creates one.

Over the course of a solar cycle, the intensity and amount of magnetism generated by the Sun increases, like soup warming up on the stove, reaching a violent climax in which twisting, tangling magnetic fields break loose and release their energy in the form of solar flare explosions, coronal mass ejections, and tremendous heating of the solar atmosphere.

Sunspots are surface features formed by the presence of strong magnetic fields, and in general the number of sunspots that can be seen and counted indicate the level of magnetic activity on the Sun. For 400 years, since Galileo first started counting sunspots through his telescope, observers have kept track of sunspot counts, and over time a pattern in their number emerged. On average, the number of sunspot activity peaks every 11 years at a time called solar maximum.

I remember when I first started working at Chabot Space & Science Center, back in 1999/2000, during the last solar maximum. Using our Sunspotter telescopes on public observing days, in teacher workshops, and in my solar summer camp, we could easily count many sunspots-sometimes as many as 20 or more! Those were the days!

In the past two or three summers, however, it’s a lucky week to spot just a single sunspot! Most of the time, the Sun’s face has been a bland disk with few discernible surface features.

That status quo should start to change, now that we have allegedly reached solar minimum and are stepping onto the uphill slope toward the next maximum, which should happen sometime around 2011 or 2012. If you want to keep tabs on the rising solar activity, and you like lots of graphs and numbers and stuff like that, check out the Solar Cycle 24 website.

Oh, why is this Cycle 24? A 19^th Century astronomer who studied the then newly discovered sunspot cycle, Rudolf Wolf, established the cycle that spanned 1755 to 1766 as Cycle 1…and they’ve been counting up ever since.

But even in this “nap time” of the Sun, today’s modern solar observatories and spacecraft, with their arrays of high-tech cameras and sensors, see plenty on the Sun to keep them busy.

Japan’s Hinode spacecraft, launched in 2006, has returned libraries of amazing pictures and movies of solar flares, activity around sunspots, circulating hot gases, fine details of the life and times of magnetic fields…and all of this during solar minimum! I can’t wait until the Sun really gets going and Hinode becomes like a camera-happy tourist in Tahiti….

Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.

More than meets the eye: The constellation Orion
in visible light (left) and infrared (right)
Visible light image: Akira Fujii;
Infrared image: Infrared Astronomical SatelliteSome months ago my blog, “SOFIA: Fly By Night,” talked about the up-and-coming astronomy ace of the night skies, SOFIA: the Stratospheric Observatory for Infrared Astronomy–a 2.5 meter infrared telescope built into a Boeing 747 airplane.

SOFIA’s been flying, and is gearing up to begin its first science flights in the not so distant future. SOFIA even put in an appearance in Bay Area skies a couple of weeks ago with a quick visit to NASA/Ames Research Center in Mountain View–then it was off again to its base of operations in the Mojave Desert.

Having worked on SOFIA’s predecessor, the Gerard P. Kuiper Airborne Observatory (KAO), in the last seven years of its operation, I thought I’d focus a bit on the science of airborne infrared astronomy, touching a bit on science done on the KAO over its 21-year career at NASA/Ames.

Why put a telescope on an airplane? Earth’s atmosphere, while transparent to the visible light the human eye can detect, is less so to many other wavelengths of light, including most infrared light. In fact, the water vapor in our atmosphere is pretty much opaque to a wide range of infrared wavelengths.

KAO flew at and altitude of 41,000 feet to get above as much as 99% of Earth’s atmospheric water vapor, giving astronomers a view of the infrared emissions from objects in space almost as if the telescope was out in space.

What’s so interesting about looking at infrared light? Aren’t visible light images taken from ground-based observatories enough?

Apparently not. Visible light is only a tiny fraction of the overall spectrum of electromagnetic radiation (the general term for “light” of all types–including gamma rays, X-rays, ultraviolet light, infrared light, microwaves and radio waves). There is a wealth of information contained in the entire electromagnetic spectrum that is only hinted at in the visible portion.

Visible light in our universe comes mostly from the photospheres of stars, either directly or by being reflected by objects such as dust, planets, comets, and the like; all of the light you see in the sky is starlight, either first hand or second hand.

Infrared light, however, is a lower energy form of electromagnetic radiation, and is emitted by any object or substance that is even slightly warm. So, interstellar clouds of molecules, rings of dust surrounding stars, atmospheres of planets–just about anything, in fact–emits its own infrared light, and observing the infrared emissions from these objects reveals a great deal about them: their chemical composition, their temperatures and densities, their velocities and structure–and a lot more.

One KAO astronomer observed the atmosphere of Venus to measure the relative abundance of hydrogen and deuterium (heavy hydrogen), looking for evidence of past oceans. Another observed Mars, looking for telltales of limestone (a mineral left behind by marine organisms) as evidence of past life on Mars. Others created detailed maps of clouds of complex molecules, probing the composition of the cooler material in our galaxy, as well as other galaxies.

The list goes on, as there’s plenty more cold matter in the universe than hot matter. Cooler matter can be more interesting, too, since complex molecules, like organic compounds and even life, don’t form in the sterile heat of stars.

So where KAO blazed an infrared contrail in the night skies, SOFIA may now follow and carry on the torch of astronomy, on the wing….
Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.

latitude: 37.8768, longitude: -122.251

Victoria Crater on Mars, similar in size to the crater the
near-Mars asteroid 2007 WD 5 would have produced.
Credit: NASA/Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter

The possibility that a sizable asteroid would strike the planet Mars on January 30th temporarily raised the excitement level in the astronomical community to a pretty high level in the last couple of months. We were even toying with the idea of having a 3:00 AM Mars Bashing Party at Chabot that morning.

At one point astronomers had given odds of 1 in 25 that asteroid 2007 WD 5, newly discovered in November, would collide with Mars–which are astronomically great odds for this sort of thing. Alas, further observations refined our knowledge of the big rock’s trajectory, and the probability declined, hitting rock bottom (0.0%) by January 9th.

Why blog about a non-event? I see it as an opportunity to talk about big rocks bashing planets in general–specifically, the Earth.

While we haven’t witnessed an event like this one (a big impact on a solid, Earth-like planet), we have examined the remains of past events, on Earth as well as other planets and moons—such as the hole in the Arizona desert called “Meteor Crater,” an impact basin roughly the size of what might have been gouged out on Mars by 2007 WD 5. And compared to the asteroid that is believed to have caused the extinction of the dinosaurs, the Meteor Crater impact was a pipsqueak!

Smaller objects hit the Earth, or its atmosphere, all the time: meteors and meteorites. Fortunately we haven’t experienced a larger impact for a very long time. There was a significant impact of some kind in 1908, over Siberia–but luckily that wasn’t a major catastrophe.

Nevertheless, the possibility of a big impact on Earth is something to take seriously. NASA certainly does. They even have a program for it: the Near Earth Object Program, whose goal is to detect and track Near Earth Objects (NEOs) in order to warn of those that might eventually collide with the Earth. A NEO is defined as an asteroid or comet whose orbit carries it close to Earth. The program searches for NEOs that are 1 kilometer in size or larger–objects that would cause catastrophic local devastation and “severe global consequences.”

Thus far, over 5,000 NEOs have been found, almost 800 of them 1 kilometer across or larger–and it is expected that there are plenty more out there that we haven’t found.

So, is this a good idea? Do we really want to know that the end of the world is going to occur on such and such a date in the near future–or would it be better not to know, living our daily lives in blissful ignorance right up to the last, Earth-shattering day?

Well, whatever your philosophical approach to that question might be, there is a practical side to the NEO Program. If we can predict a NEO collision with enough advance warning, there may be something we can do to avert disaster. For example, we could send Bruce Willis out to destroy it… .

Seriously, though, NASA is working on methods of diverting the course of a NEO, possibly with a spaceship that acts as a sort of tug boat, gently nudging the NEO off course far enough in advance of the impact to make it eventually miss the Earth.

This month, however, Mars 1, asteroid 0. The Martians are quite relieved…

Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.

latitude: 37.8768, longitude: -122.251

Picture of the edge of Victoria Crater superimposed with
image of the rover Opportunity.
Credit: NASA/JPLMars is not only on the horizon, it’s become a sky-high creature of the night…and so, it’s time to blog about the Red Planet once again, and to showcase a few favorite pictures from the veteran robots presently exploring that world.

Mars reaches “opposition” on December 24th. This is the time when Earth crosses directly between the Sun and Mars–in other words, when Mars is at the opposite end of the sky from the Sun and at its closest distance from Earth–this time about 55 million miles. You can see Mars yourself in the evening hours if you face east and look high: it’s that steady, bright, orange dot right between Gemini and Taurus.

So what’s been happening on Mars, exploration-wise? Here’s a quick summary on that score:

NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, have had their tours of duty extended a fifth time, which should keep the rovers going–their health willing–possibly through 2009. Having landed on Mars in January of 2004 for a nominal 90 day mission, the robot pair has now lasted almost four years.

Spirit, which landed in the huge Gusev Crater, has traveled four and a half miles from its landing point and is now exploring a range of hills on a volcanic plateau. Probably topping the list of scientific evidence it has turned up is that water, in some form, has altered the chemistry in the environment, sometime in the past.

Opportunity, on the opposite side of the planet from Spirit, is currently exploring the half-mile-wide Victoria Crater. Exposed rock layers in the walls of the crater are expected to be an excellent “book” of Mars’ geologic history for Opportunity’s various instruments to read.

In its more than seven mile journey, Opportunity has revealed even stronger evidence that Mars’ distant past may have been warmer and wetter, and that, at least in Opportunity’s neck of the woods (Meridiani Planum), there may have been extended periods with liquid surface water.

The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter spacecraft, with its array of instruments and super-powerful camera, has produced the most discerning orbital imagery of Mars’ surface to date, giving us aerial views of the Martian deserts, canyons, ice caps, plateaus, volcanoes, craters, drainage channels, sand dunes, and so on, that look like they could have been taken from the window of a small airplane flying at very low altitude.

Even as Spirit and Opportunity send back postcard after postcard from the ground, like a pair of camera-happy tourists, that tantalize us with evidence of possible lakes, seas, and oceans in Mars’ past, Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter with its more global viewpoint has revealed evidence that suggest another possibility: that the apparently periodic “bursts” of water activity might have been the work of large meteoroid impacts blasting through layers of ice and creating temporary episodes of water melt…

To round out the role-call, NASA’s 2001 Mars Odyssey and Europe’s Mars Express orbiters are also still in business and contributing to our already huge–but nowhere near complete–body of knowledge of that wandering orange dot in the sky…

Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.

latitude: 37.8148, longitude: -122.178

Artist concept of a Neptune-sized planet
orbiting the star 55 Cancri. Credit: NASAAnother milestone has been reached in the two-decade old search for “extrasolar planets,” a.k.a exoplanets– planets that orbit stars other than our Sun. In November it was announced that the leading exoplanet research team– the California and Carnegie Planet Search Team, led on the California side by U. C. Berkeley’s Dr. Geoff Marcy– has succeeded in detecting five, count ‘em, five planets orbiting the same parent star.

The star, 55 Cancri, a Sun-like star in the constellation Cancer, has been under exoplanet surveillance for 20 years, and yielded the secret of its first planet in 1996. Over the years of continued observations, one by one more planets in its retinue have been coaxed out of the data.

Personally, moments like this are an impetus to step back and reflect on the state of our understanding of the universe. How much more we know now than we did when I was a starry-eyed child back in the 1960s! We knew of no planets beyond our Solar System when I was a kid. In fact, further observation of our own Solar System has, ironically, reduced the number of planets at home from nine to eight! Even pictures of places like Mars, and certainly the moons of outer solar system planets like Jupiter and Saturn, were blurry, grainy images lacking much detail.

Now, more than 260 planets orbiting other stars have been found (although we don’t have actual pictures of them at this point). Still, going from my childhood, when exoplanets were theoretical and the question was still asked whether our Solar System is somehow special, even unique, to have planets at all, to today’s solid body count of “worlds out there”…is simply breathtaking.

Most exoplanet detections are made by the measurement of the slight wobbling motion a star makes due to the gravitational pull of any planets it might possess. You might be imagining astronomers taking video of a star and playing it back at high speed to see it slither like a snake– but that isn’t how it’s done. Instead, the measurement is made using the Doppler Shift– observing changes in the star’s speed by measuring the corresponding change in the wavelength of its light. (This is the same way that the Highway Patrol nabs speeders on the freeway, using radio-frequency waves.)

So what’s the 55 Cancri system like? Well, by virtue of the fact that current exoplanet detection techniques can only reveal large planets–gas giants like Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune– all five of the 55 Cancri planets are such. One of them, in fact, is four times the size of Jupiter–and another, Neptune-sized world orbits so close that it only takes only 2.8 days to make one circuit around its star. Not much like the Solar System we know and love–but there’s plenty of room for variety in the universe, after all.

The next big move in the exoplanet hunt will be for Earth-sized planets orbiting their stars at Earth-like distances– a feat to be attempted by NASA’s Kepler mission coming up in 2008. As always, stay tuned…

Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.

latitude: 37.8148, longitude: -122.178