<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QUEST Community Science Blog - KQED &#187; jupiter</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/jupiter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog</link>
	<description>Science, Environment, and Nature in the SF Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 23:34:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Jumpin&#039; Jupiter! Where Did the Galileans Go?</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/09/11/jumpin-jupiter-where-did-the-galileans-go/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/09/11/jumpin-jupiter-where-did-the-galileans-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 18:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burress</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KQED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[callisto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chabot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chabot space and science center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[europa]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[galileo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ganyemede]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[io]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupiter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=3589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Had Galileo spied the planet Jupiter with his telescope 400 years ago on a night such as a couple of Thursdays ago, would the history of modern astronomy have unfolded any differently?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Jupiter-3-2009-09-02.jpg" /><em style="margin: 5px 0px 5px 10px; width: 300px; line-height: 110%">Three views of Jupiter before, during, and after the disappearing act by its four large moons. Credit, Conrad Jung, Chabot Space &amp; Science Center</em></span>Now you see them, now you don't! Had Galileo spied the planet Jupiter with his telescope 400 years ago on a night such as a couple of Thursdays ago, would the history of modern astronomy have unfolded any differently? Would Jupiter's four large "Galilean" moons have been named so in his honor? Would we still think that everything revolves around the Earth? </p>
<p>What am I talking about? About a week ago a relatively rare alignment of Jupiter and its four Galilean moons—Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto—made for a brief time in which the moons disappeared, hidden behind and in front of their massive parent planet.  For that brief time, Earth, Jupiter, and all four Galileans coincided on a nearly perfect line. </p>
<p>The event took place late in the evening on September 2nd, a little after 10:00 PM.  <a href="http://www.solarviews.com/eng/ganymede.htm">Ganymede </a> (the Solar System's largest moon) and <a href="http://www.solarviews.com/eng/europa.htm">Europa </a>(the "snowball" with the probable deep liquid water oceans under its icy crust) crossed in front of Jupiter's disk, and the other pair, <a href="http://www.solarviews.com/eng/io.htm">Io </a>(the volcano moon) and <a href="http://www.solarviews.com/eng/callisto.htm">Callisto </a>passed behind it. </p>
<p>It's not uncommon for one of these moons to be out of view for a time when you aim a telescope at Jupiter.  Even Galileo, on his first telescopic look at Jupiter, saw only three of them.  </p>
<p>The disappearance of two or three of them at once is more rare, however, and a vanishing act by all four only happens a few times in a lifetime—every century, there are about 20 such alignments.  The last such event prior to last week's was back in the 1980's; the next one won't happen until 2019.  This event was not only <a href="http://www.chabotspace.org/vsc/observatory/nellie/astrophotos/captions/jupiter-2009-09-02.asp">observed on September 2nd</a> by Chabot Space &amp; Science Center astronomer Conrad Jung, but also in 1913 by then Chabot Observatory director Charles Burckhalter.</p>
<p>When Galileo took his newly made telescope and became the first person in history to look at Jupiter through the new invention, he saw three star-like points of light positioned around Jupiter, roughly on a common line that passed through the planet.  At first he thought they might be stars, but on subsequent nights he observed that not only did these "stars" follow Jupiter's own movement through space, they changed position relative to each other.  This led to Galileo's hypothesis that these were satellites in orbit around Jupiter.</p>
<p>The rest is history (oh, and lifelong house arrest for Galileo for suggesting that there was something in the Universe that didn't revolve directly around the Earth…). </p>
<p>I'm sure that if Galileo had first looked at Jupiter on one of these rare nights and saw no moons, he would certainly have discovered them the next time he looked at Jupiter—so maybe it wouldn't have changed the unfolding of historical events much.  But I wonder which would have been more surprising to him:  seeing the moons on the first look, or observing them to appear out of nowhere after the initial observation of a solitary Jupiter….</p>

	<br><strong>Tags:&nbsp;</strong><a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/astronomy/" title="Astronomy" rel="tag">Astronomy</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/callisto/" title="callisto" rel="tag">callisto</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/chabot/" title="chabot" rel="tag">chabot</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/chabot-space-and-science-center/" title="chabot space and science center" rel="tag">chabot space and science center</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/europa/" title="europa" rel="tag">europa</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/galileo/" title="galileo" rel="tag">galileo</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/ganyemede/" title="ganyemede" rel="tag">ganyemede</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/io/" title="io" rel="tag">io</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/jupiter/" title="jupiter" rel="tag">jupiter</a><br/>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/09/11/jumpin-jupiter-where-did-the-galileans-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<georss:point featurename="[37.8148, -122.178]">37.8148 -122.178</georss:point>

		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Jupiter-3-2009-09-02.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Jupiter-3-2009-09-02.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jupiter &quot;Nuked&quot; By Comet? (again)</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/07/31/jupiter-nuked-by-comet-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/07/31/jupiter-nuked-by-comet-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 19:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ben Burress</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Astronomy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KQED]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Partners]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[amateur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[astronomer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[impact]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jupiter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shoemaker-levy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=3225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An Earth-sized hole on Jupiter! What happened?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="left"><img src="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jupiter_boom.jpg" /><em style="margin: 5px 0px 5px 10px; width: 300px; line-height: 110%">Hot spot created by impact on Jupiter, taken by NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility in Hawaii. Picture credit, NASA. </em></span><em>An Earth-sized hole on Jupiter!</em> the email alerts, websites, and finally news channels were saying on Monday, July 20th.  At Chabot, we were polled by at least two local news channels asking what had happened.  So, what happened?</p>
<p>Evidently, the aftermath of some kind of collision on Jupiter was <a href="http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/07/21/amateur-astronomer-finds-new-earth-size-impact-mark-on-jupiter/?hp">spotted by an amateur astronomer</a> in Australia that Monday morning.  He spotted a dark marking near the planet's South Pole, and alerted NASA.  NASA in turn turned its large infrared telescope in Hawaii onto the scene of the crash.  </p>
<p>There glowed the thermal footprint of the likely impact, the affected area <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/interactive/2009/jul/21/jupiter-asteroid-comet-hole">roughly the size of the Earth</a>.  Had this impact taken place on Earth instead, the results would have been catastrophic.  Fortunately this was Jupiter, half a billion miles away and large enough to absorb the impact without lasting effects.  (And, owing to the fact that Jupiter is a gaseous planet with no solid surface, it would quickly heal from the trauma, not unlike that liquid-metal Terminator from the second movie of the same name.)</p>
<p>A significant event? Yes, in fact.  But that's not all&#8230; </p>
<p>Rewind 15 years to July 20th, 1994, the middle of the week during which twenty-something fragments of the broken <a href="http://seds.org/archive/sl9/sl9.html">comet Shoemaker-Levy 9</a> were in fact colliding with Jupiter&#8230;  An amazing coincidence? Yes; the two events likely have nothing to do with each other.  So, then, a common event, if we're seeing two of them in the span of only 15 years? Well&#8230; not really.</p>
<p>When the string of fragments of Shoemaker-Levy 9 hailed down on Jupiter, it was the first time in history that humans had observed actual impacts on a Solar System body (other than perhaps the Sun&#8211;but as it turns out comets hitting that huge target are not uncommon).  The Shoemaker-Levy 9 impacts, and the one on July 20th this year, left highly visible marks that lasted for days.  The amateur astronomer who discovered the recent scar did so with a relatively small 14.5&#8243; backyard telescope!  So, if this sort of impact were a common event, even if the impacting comets or asteroids were never seen, the gashes they leave in Jupiter's atmosphere ought to be spotted from time to time. </p>
<p>Impacts—on Jupiter, Earth, and all the bodies of the Solar System—do occur, and the smaller the impacting object, the more frequently they happen.  For a <a href="http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/target.html">planet like Earth</a>, on average a chunk of rock a few meters across <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/03/25/asteroid-apophis-hit-or-miss/">enters our atmosphere </a>about once a year, and often burns up completely or explodes before hitting the ground.  A 50 meter object, again on average, is likely to <a href="http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/30jun_tunguska.htm">strike Earth once in a century</a>.  A one-kilometer object impact averages every few hundred thousand years, and a multi-kilometer sized asteroid or comet similar to the one that wiped out the dinosaurs and which would cause global catastrophe—well, the last one of that size struck ground 65 million years ago. </p>
<p>As for Jupiter, being a larger target than Earth, having a much stronger gravitational pull, and being close to the asteroid belt—well, Jupiter's impact statistics should probably involve higher frequencies than Earth.<br />
In fact, impacts like the one on July 20th are happy events for us; every time Jupiter is hit by a large object, that's one less object in the Solar System that could potentially hit the Earth in the future.  So, on July 20th, Jupiter took another bullet for us.</p>

	<br><strong>Tags:&nbsp;</strong><a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/amateur/" title="amateur" rel="tag">amateur</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/astronomer/" title="astronomer" rel="tag">astronomer</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/comet/" title="comet" rel="tag">comet</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/impact/" title="impact" rel="tag">impact</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/jupiter/" title="jupiter" rel="tag">jupiter</a>, <a href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/tag/shoemaker-levy/" title="shoemaker-levy" rel="tag">shoemaker-levy</a><br/>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/07/31/jupiter-nuked-by-comet-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		<georss:point featurename="[37.8148, -122.178]">37.8148 -122.178</georss:point>

		<media:thumbnail url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jupiter_boom.jpg" />
		<media:content url="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/jupiter_boom.jpg" medium="image" />
	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
