Identical twins are more similar to one another than a clone
will be to the person cloned.President Obama lifted the ban on federal funding of embryonic stem cell research last Monday. Many researchers breathed a sigh of relief as they could finally get to work using these cells to find treatments and even cures for many debilitating diseases and injuries.

Of course, these cells aren't any less controversial than they were eight years ago. Researchers will still need to destroy embryos to get these cells (at least until they perfect iPS cells which would make this part of the debate moot). Anyone who considers an embryo made up of a few hundred cells to be alive will protest that embryo's destruction.

This is a legitimate argument based on when someone believes life begins. But some protests I heard were from people worried about embryonic stem cells being used to clone humans. What I can't figure out is why anyone would want to clone someone.

Cloning won't be like it is in the movies. Scientists won't take a cell from someone and make an exact copy of a person who is the same age and has the same memory.

Instead, a human will be cloned like any other mammal. First they'll remove the DNA-containing nucleus from an egg. Then they'll fuse that egg with a cell from the person they want to clone.

This "fertilized egg" will then have to grow and develop in a surrogate mother, be born, and then have to grow up. The clone won't have any of the original's memories.

In essence, a clone would be more like an identical twin who has been reared apart from his or her twin. Even though identical twins reared apart have a lot of similarities, they have a lot of differences, too. One article I saw put the amount of behavior/personality similarity due to genes at something around 50%.

And a clone will probably be more different than that. When the cell's nucleus is put into the egg, scientists erase a lot of the markings on the DNA that originally turned it into an adult cell. This "fertilized egg" is now a blank cell which can be shaped by both its genes AND its environment.

Identical twins develop in the same womb at the same time and so are exposed to the same sorts of environmental effects. A clone would not be. And these environmental factors can affect how we develop. They can even alter DNA and as a result, alter who we become.

I had always thought that bringing back an extinct animal like the mammoth was impossible using today's techniques. I may have been wrong.

Maybe a clone of this guy will wander the Earth one day.A new study shows that scientists can clone a mouse that has been dead and frozen for 16 years. If they can apply what they've learned to a mammoth that has been dead and frozen for over 10,000 years, then maybe my kids can ride a mammoth one day. Or at least my grandkids can.

You Need More than DNA to Clone

Cloning isn't as simple as was shown in Jurassic Park. You can't take DNA and make a clone from it. Instead, you need an intact nucleus. And ideally, an intact nucleus in an intact cell.

The nucleus is where DNA is kept in our cells. The DNA is stored and packaged there in a way that only Mother Nature can do (for now). We can’t take our 6 feet of DNA and cram it into the tiny space of the nucleus.

Cloning 101.As I said, right now cloning uses intact cells. Here's how it works:

1) Take a cell from the animal to be cloned
2) Remove the nucleus from an egg (this is called an enucleated egg)
3) Fuse the two cells and let it divide a few times in a Petri dish
4) Implant the growing embryo into a surrogate mother
5) If everything goes well, a clone is born

This procedure requires living intact cells to be used. The problem with a frozen animal cell is that it is dead and ice crystals have torn it apart. It is not possible to fuse a beat up dead cell with an enucleated egg.

Cloning Using Frozen Cells

What the researchers in this new study did was change the protocol a bit. Instead of fusing two cells, they harvested nuclei from the frozen cells and injected them directly into the enucleated egg.

When they tried to clone the mouse that had been frozen for 16 years this way, it didn't work. But they managed to get 4 clones by adding an extra step. What they did was to make embryonic stem (ES) cells from the frozen mouse and use those cells to make a clone.

Basically they cloned the mouse but then instead of putting the embryo into a surrogate mother, they harvested its ES cells. Then they used the nuclei from these cells to create a clone in the usual way.

So we can now clone a long frozen mouse. The next step will be to try to clone an extinct animal like a mammoth.

Cloning a Mammoth is Trickier than a Mouse

Mammoth cloning will be no walk in the park. First off, we don’t have any mammoth eggs or cells to use. We'll have to use elephant ones. Hopefully, elephant eggs and/or cells will be compatible with a mammoth's nucleus. ( But there is some concern they they might not be compatible.)

Second, elephants are a lot harder to work with than mice. The experiments in this study used thousands of eggs to get a few clones. I don’t know enough about elephant biology but it seems like you'd need a lot of elephants to get that many eggs.

But this is definitely the first step in resurrecting long dead animals. For now we'll have to focus on the frozen ones. Maybe in the future researchers can figure out how to clone animals stored in formaldehyde. Or from pelts. Then we can start reviving species we humans have managed to kill off over the years.