QUEST Community Science Blog Author: Ben Burress

All Posts by Benjamin:

Opportunity is Still Rockin'!

August 29th, 2008 by Ben Burress

Forward camera view from Opportunity as the rover attempts to
climb up a slope toward the wall of Victoria Crater.
Photo by NASA/MER/Opportunity.Is there life on Mars? Well, that investigation is still ongoing–but from a cybernetic perspective, the surface of Mars is literally crawling with it: in the form of robots!

Four years after their planned three-month tour of duty began, NASA’s Mars Exploration Rovers (MER) Spirit and Opportunity roll doggedly on like a pair of aged, dusty desert prospectors looking for gold. In this case the “gold” is evidence for past water on Mars, and signs of that seem to abound.

What sparked this blog for me was the announcement of the plan to send Opportunity out of the depths of Victoria Crater, the half-mile impact crater that the rover has been exploring for almost a year now. Last September, when it was decided to send Opportunity into Victoria to get a close-up view of the sedimentary rock layers exposed in the crater walls, there was a lot of talk about this expedition possibly being the rover’s last–it almost sounded like the robot was being sent into its own grave, its final resting place on Mars. After all, the rover had already operated ten times longer than what it was designed for!

What did Opportunity’s year-long sojourn yield? By examining the multitude of exposed sedimentary layers, it is believed that those layers were probably originally laid down by wind (not a surprise on Mars, which even today is a world of wind-blown dust: dust devils, sand dunes, planet-wide dust storms). But there are also clues written in the rocks that the layers of sediment have been modified by the action of water.

One particular thing Opportunity has discovered are rock features dubbed “fins.” These fins are raised edges around rock boundaries that are rich in the mineral hematite–a mineral that often forms in the presence of water. Opportunity found hematite on Mars early in its exploration, which supports the speculation that at least that rover’s region on Mars (Meridiani Planum) may have harbored at least shallow and intermittent bodies of water in the past.

The “fins” may have been formed when water dissolved away areas of sediment and then “filled in the holes” with deposited minerals–forming a kind of “fossil” of what was once an empty space.

When I lived in Northern Arizona, I remember driving across the plains east of Flagstaff and finding long, wide ridges of what looked like sandstone, snaking across the dusty desert like enormous gopher trails. I learned that these were the fossil remnants of what were stream beds: the streams formed deposits of sand and mud in their bed, which over time hardened into sandstone and mudstone. Later, the softer surrounding soils and sands eroded away, leaving the hardened stream beds as raised ridges of rock–dry evidence in a dry desert of past liquid water action. Though this is not the same process that formed the fins on Mars, it is analogous.

But now Opportunity’s mission in Victoria Crater is done, and NASA is making plans to have the robot crawl back up the slope and exit the crater at the same place it entered last September. It will continue its mission by examining “cobbles”–small, loose stones on the surrounding planes, some of which were probably ejected by meteorite impacts in Mars’ distant past.

Spirit, on the other side of the planet in Gusev Crater, is also still alive, and is making ready to do a bit more roving after a Martian winter of relative inactivity. With one of its six wheels no longer functioning, Spirit will limp along and continue prospecting–next stop: some white, silica-rich material that may have formed in hot water.




37.8148, -122.178




Posted in Astronomy, Geology, KQED, Partners | Please Comment

Mars Phoenix: Is It Ice Yet?

August 15th, 2008 by Ben Burress

The ‘Snow White’ excavation trench, after rasping
and digging by Phoenix. Credit: “NASA/Mars Phoenix”

Since witnessing the historic landing of NASA’s Mars Phoenix Lander on May 25, I’ve been holding my breath to learn if Phoenix has made the discovery it set out to make: whether it landed on a vast deposit of water ice near Mars’ northern polar cap.

It took several weeks after landing for the declaration to finally be made-and without further ado, YES, definitely, water ice was found by Phoenix. But even now, in August, it seems the declaration of Phoenix’s great discovery is still in the process of unfolding, one careful and tantalizing announcement after another.

From a lay point of view one might think, why did it take weeks for Phoenix scientists to announce that, yes, the white stuff scraped up by the lander’s instruments, from under a thin topping of soil, is water ice? And why do there seem to be unanswered questions about the nature of that ice even now, three months after landing?

For those familiar with how a remote robot probe like Phoenix makes its investigation, this is not surprising at all. In fact, serious scientific measurements by Phoenix didn’t happen immediately after landing. The mission team had a lot of work to do to make sure the spacecraft was healthy and undamaged, ready to explore.

Then, the team worked Phoenix’s robot arm and soil scooper to dig, scrape, and eventually scoop up soil and bits of the white substance and drop it into Phoenix’s onboard laboratory compartments. At first, there wasn’t much of the white substance included in the scooped up samples. Then, the sample stuck to the scoop. So, just getting an adequate sample into the spacecraft where it could be analyzed wasn’t a simple matter of scoop and dump….

Eventually, though, the white substance was identified as water ice. The first clue came when the white substance was exposed to the air and sunlight after being dug up, when it began to slowly disappear: it sublimated (went directly from its solid state to a gaseous state, without passing through a liquid state, without passing Go and collecting $200…). If the white substance were, say, a type of salt, it wouldn’t have done that.

Inside Phoenix’s chemical laboratories, more definitive tests were performed. One instrument is essentially a small oven in which a sample is slowly heated and any gases that boil off (excuse me: sublimate) are identified by a gas analyzer.

But there were still plot complications! One is the possible detection of the chemical “perchlorate” in the ice sample: an oxidizing ion (a compound of chlorine and oxygen) which, if it does turn out to exist in the Martian ice, will give scientists new food for thought on Martian chemistry and the implications for possible Martian life. It wouldn’t rule out the possibility of life (past or present), but is an additional factor in the equation.

So, the search for life on Mars-the big-picture-reason we’ve been looking for water there-goes on. We have to keep in view the fact that finding microbial life, or fossils thereof, on Mars isn’t as simple a matter as snapping a picture and looking for plants and animals; it’s more like a 19^th Century story I heard of where a race of mile-high beings from Jupiter land on Earth, and at first don’t realize there is life here, under their feet….




37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners | Please Comment

Messages from Mercury

July 30th, 2008 by Ben Burress

A limb shot of Mercury’s horizon taken by the
MESSENGER spacecraft on January 14, 2008.
Photo Credit “NASA/MESSENGER”

If you can take a name like “Mercury Surface, Space Environment, Geochemistry and Ranging” and craft it into a neat acronym like MESSENGER, then you may have a future working with NASA….

And no, this blog isn’t about NASA acronymizations, but rather the heat-resistant robot behind one of them. MESSENGER is the space probe that NASA sent to Mercury to give the Solar System’s innermost planet the first up-close look since 1975, when Mariner 10 flew by.

Though MESSENGER’s main mission will begin in earnest when it returns to Mercury and finally settles into an orbit around the planet, on March 18th 2011, we were given a tantalizing peak last January 14th when the probe made its initial flyby.

What did this quick, on the fly snapshot tell us that we didn’t know before? Well-a lot, considering Mercury has been one of the least understood planets in the Solar System, and was for a long time thought to be similar in character to our own Moon. Mercury is shaping up to be a lot less like Earth’s Moon than its gray, cratered, airless appearance would mislead.

One key difference: density-how much material is packed into the planet; or how heavy a standard sized chunk of it would be. Our Moon is a lightweight on this score, with an average density of only 3.4 grams per cubic centimeter, while Mercury weighs in at a hefty 5.427 g/cc-almost as dense as Earth.

Another key difference: magnetic field. Planets like Earth and the Gas Giant worlds (Jupiter et al) generate respectable magnetic force fields, useful for everything from deflecting plasma flowing from the Sun (the “solar wind”) to properly directing magnetic compass needles. Venus, Mars, and our Moon do not possess magnetic fields worth mentioning, as it turns out.

Mercury, on the other hand, does. Planetary magnetic fields are believed to be generated by currents in a planet’s liquid outer core-like how the electric current in the wire coil of an electromagnet generates a magnetic field. Mercury’s magnetic field suggests it still has some activity in its core-molten metals circulating in currents as the core slowly cools off. And speaking of Mercury’s core, it appears to comprise 60% of the planet’s mass-about twice what is “typical” for Terrestrial (solid) planets.

I’ve often imagined Mercury to be a cosmic goldmine, with its apparent richness in metals and its density. I wonder if an astronaut could just walk along and pick up chunks of gold from its surface….

Another interesting find by MESSENGER is that some of the flat plains on Mercury may have been formed by volcanoes, long ago. In particular, MESSENGER imaged a number of volcanoes along the edge of the Caloris Basin, a large impact basin-one of the largest in the Solar System, at 1550 kilometers across.

The news coming out of the innermost region of the Solar System makes me giddy. Too bad I have to wait until 2011 for my next look at Mercury. These things take time.




37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners | Please Comment

The Asteroid Hunters

July 18th, 2008 by Ben Burress

Asteroid 35107, captured on Chabot Space
& Science Center’s telescope.

Photo By Conrad Jung and Gerald McKeegan

You must be very quiet; we are hunting…asteroids!

On July 14th, 2008, an almost Hollywood-like drama took place in space nearby: a “double,” or binary, asteroid whizzed past Earth, grazing by at a distance of only 1.4 million miles. One of the rocks is over 200 meters across, the other a whopping 600 meters-about half the size of Half Dome in Yosemite!

1.4 million miles may sound like a large distance, but by the standard of big rocks flying by the Earth, that’s breathtakingly close. Discovered only last January, this pair of asteroids went from being completely unknown to blasting by Earth’s doorstep in only months. Had they actually hit the Earth, they would have caused major devastation at and near the impact site, with very little warning.

Fortunately, there are programs to search for and track these flying mountains-also called “Near Earth Objects” (NEOs)-and I’m very pleased to announce that Chabot Space & Science Center (specifically our 36-inch reflecting telescope, “Nellie”) has very recently become an official contributor to the NEO search program of the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center (MPC)! Nellie is designated by the MPC as Observatory G58.

In this MPC program, observatories around the world contribute by searching for and tracking NEOs: asteroids, and comets, whose orbits can carry them close to Earth and which are large enough to cause catastrophic damage should they hit us.

In order to take part in the NEO program, Chabot observers Conrad Jung (on the Chabot staff) and Gerald McKeegan (of the Eastbay Astronomical Society) conducted a four-month program to develop and hone the necessary skills and data processing techniques, as well as to configure telescope equipment, to meet MPC qualifications.

To that end, they observed a set of known asteroids-some NEO’s and some “Main Belt” asteroids. (One of these Main Belt asteroids, “Carter 10683,” was named for former Chabot board member and president of the Eastbay Astronomical Society, Carter Roberts, who, sadly, passed away earlier this year.)

Chabot’s asteroid hunters will begin their tenure of official asteroid observation by verifying the orbits of recently discovered NEOs and reporting the additional observations to the MPC, where it will be used to refine our knowledge of the NEOs’ orbits. The next step in the program will ultimately be to hunt for currently undiscovered asteroids.

The process for finding, tracking, and reporting NEO observations goes something like this. With a digital (CCD) camera attached to the telescope, a section of the sky is imaged three or four times in a half-hour period. The images are processed and compared, and any star-like dots that are found to move between one image and the next become suspect asteroids. (The word “asteroid,” by the way, literally means “star-like”-so named because through most telescopes asteroids are too far away and too small to appear as anything more than points of light.)

The coordinates of any moving dots are calculated for all of the images they are in, and this information is sent to the MPC to be added to the data from other NEO hunting observatories. From the combined observations of all the observatories, a precision database of the orbits of near-Earth rocks is maintained, and with it NEOs that may pose a threat to the Earth may be identified.

Hunting NEOs may be like searching for needles in a really big haystack-but in jobs like this, the more eyes on the problem the better. Nellie is now one more eye on lookout duty…

Click here for a closer view of the asteroid shown above.





37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners | Please Comment

Planetary Robotic Roundup

July 4th, 2008 by Ben Burress

NASA’s MESSENGER spacecraft at Mercury-artist concept.

Photo by: NASA

I’ve been waiting for the “whole story” on Martian ice at the Phoenix lander site to unfold more completely, but the chemical analyses have not yet run their full courses-so I’ve decided to widen the focus on this blog to give a status report on current active robotic exploration of planets going on around the Solar System.

Limiting my scope to only planetary spacecraft, the list is still respectable. In no particular order, here’s the round-up:

Spirit: Mars Exploration Rover Spirit’s activities on the Martian surface have been reduced to save on power, but the robot remains alive. With the arrival of Martian winter, Spirit spends more power running heaters to keep key electronic and power equipment healthy. Spirit remains in the giant Gusev Crater, where it will spend its entire life on Mars.

Opportunity: Exploring a much smaller crater of its own, Victoria Crater-Spirit’s twin, Opportunity, continues its investigation of the rock layers of Mars’ geological history. As of June 10, Opportunity has clocked in at 7.26 miles of total “roving” on Mars, since its landing back in 2004.

Phoenix: The brand-spankin’-new Mars Phoenix lander has been digging into one of Mars’ greatest scientific mysteries: water. Detailed chemical analysis of samples taken at Phoenix’s site near the northern polar ice cap is underway, but the big question– is Phoenix standing on frozen Martian water– has been answered: yes.

Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter: The newest orbiter in the Martian fleet continues to send back its extreme-high-resolution imagery and its revealing chemical measurements, as well as to serve as a high-speed data and communication relay for other Mars-exploring robots.

Mars 2001 Odyssey: Credited with detecting the massive amounts of frozen water in Mars’ northern hemisphere-the same ice that the Phoenix lander is now scraping at, Mars 2001 Odyssey continues its surveillance of Mars’ chemistry and atmosphere.

Mars Express: The European orbiter that launched the ill-fated Beagle II lander has continued on a respectable career of exploration in its own right. Mars Express also helped support the landing of the Phoenix.

Cassini: Saturn’s first robot-in-residence, Cassini, has concluded its initial 4-year mission and is now continuing on an extended mission. Cassini has given us unprecedented close-up images and measurements of many of Saturn’s stunning moons, its complicated ring system, and the swirling, aurora-touched cloud formations of Saturn itself.

MESSENGER: The first spacecraft to visit the little-understood Mercury since 1975 made its first flyby of that planet last January, and will settle into a permanent orbit in March 2011. Even the few pics it snapped as it hurled by gave us far more detailed images of Mercury than ever before.

New Horizons: Launched a couple years ago on its outward bound, meteoric flight to Pluto, New Horizons has already performed some exploration duty, capturing images and data of Jupiter, Jupiter’s volcanic moon Io, and Jupiter’s long magnetic “tail.” Now in “cruise mode,” this little robot will fly past Pluto (dwarf planet; king of the Plutoids) in July 2015.

Voyagers 1 and 2: Do you remember the remarkable voyages of discovery made by the Voyager spacecraft, both launched in 1977? Since completing their primary missions of flying by the Gas Giant planets (Voyager 1 at Jupiter and Saturn, Voyager 2 at all four), these two veterans have continued to operate and send information back to Earth, and are now about 3 times more distant from the Sun than Pluto.

That’s the wrap. If I missed anyone, my apologies!




37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners | 1 Comment

Come Together, Bright Planets, Over Me….

June 20th, 2008 by Ben Burress

Depiction of a major alignment of
the five visible planets in 1059 BCE.

Photo By Ben Burress

There are some pretty good “lineups” coming soon to skies above you.

First of all, “lineups,” or alignments, go on in the heavens all the time, though most often they are alignments of objects too faint to easily notice, if at all. With that said, this summer holds some significant alignments of some of the brightest objects in the sky.

First on my hit list is the upcoming Saturn-Mars “near-miss”. Though these two planets are not coming physically close to each other (the closest actual distance they come to each other is about 750 million miles), they will align so closely along the same line of sight that on July 11^th they will appear only ¾ of a degree apart-that’s not much greater than the width of a Full Moon. The best time to see this pairing is after sunset on the evenings of July 10, 11, and 12, over the western horizon.

The next big ticket alignment is on August 1^st, when the Moon and the Sun occupy the same spot in the sky-the event we call a Total Solar Eclipse. As it happens, we won’t be able to see this eclipse directly from the United States, as it will only be visible in Asia. However, NASA will be broadcasting live coverage of the eclipse from Northern China. We’ll be showing NASA’s broadcast in our planetarium at Chabot Space and Science Center, in case you’d care to come up and enjoy the spectacle. Don’t let the fact that the live event goes on around 4:00 AM keep you away…it’s worth getting up for!

A bit further out on the calendar is the September alignment of three planets: Venus, Mars, and Mercury. In the dusky twilight of mid-September evenings the three will be gathering. The closest grouping of the trio is on September 11^th, when they will be within about three degrees of each other-close enough that you can just about cover all three with your thumb. Mercury and Mars won’t be very bright in the twilight-but Venus, bright enough to spot easily, can help guide your eye to the other two. Using a pair of binoculars will help a lot-but make sure you don’t point them that way until after the Sun sets….

In ancient times (and in some cases not so ancient times), different cultures around the world have viewed alignments like these in different ways. Eclipses-both solar and lunar-were regarded by many cultures as bad omens, or bad occurrences (such as the Sun being devoured by a celestial animal-dragon, dog or other-in the case of a solar eclipse).

Planetary alignments were also given special consideration, sometimes being regarded as auspicious (for good or bad-usually the latter). One major alignment of the five visible planets (February 26, 1953 BCE) was believed to have “mandated” the creation of the Hsia Dynasty in China-the first great Chinese Dynasty. (Then, four centuries later, Mars, Mercury, Jupiter and Saturn apparently conspired to bring down that same dynasty-at least, their alignment on December 20, 1576 BCE was interpreted as an indicator of the dynasty’s corruption, and it was overthrown by a revolt of believers…).

However you regard the lining up of celestial bodies (astronomically, astrologically, or aesthetically), these alignments are pleasing to watch, and times to reflect upon the constant and cyclic movement among the heavens. Enjoy….




37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners | Please Comment

Phoenix on Ice?

June 9th, 2008 by Ben Burress


A patch of what might be ice, exposed by Phoenix’s
landing rockets.So, did it land on ice? Huh? Did it?

Two blogs ago I wrote about the then upcoming landing of the Phoenix spacecraft on Mars, near the Northern polar ice cap (Probing the Martian Pole). The entire point of landing on Mars’ extreme northern plains was to find and examine ice-ice we know is up there in great abundance, as detected by orbiting spacecraft (Mars Odyssey 2001).

There, frozen under the surface dust layers, is a vast deposit of ice-”enough to fill Lake Michigan twice.” So Phoenix was sent to actually land there and scrape up surface samples of the soil, and hopefully ice. The question was, would the layer of dust covering the ice be thin enough for Phoenix to reach the ice with its robotic arm and shovel?

The landing occurred on May 25th-a successful landing. NASA broadcast the drama live on NASA TV, which we shared with several hundred Chabot visitors via planetarium, theater, and closed-circuit TV. There were no actual images coming from Phoenix during the landing-after all, it was cooped up in its protective shell for much of the descent-but the excitement of the real-time drama and the nervous faces of NASA/JPL were enough to enthrall our audience. Pictures wouldn’t come form Phoenix until later that night at the earliest.

But the pictures did come in over the days following. At first they looked much like images from other Mars landers (Viking, Pathfinder, Spirit, Opportunity), only flatter. Rusty red soil, low flat horizon, a scattering of pebbles and rocks. The landscape itself appeared less interesting to me than other landing sites-but if you measure Phoenix’s success by the beauty of the scenery, you’re missing the point.

Phoenix is pretty much all about the ice, and what chemicals are frozen and preserved in it. The questions asked by the Phoenix mission are: did life ever arise on Mars, is the current climate on Mars suitable to support life, and what is Mars’ geological makeup? If the vast ice deposits of the flat northern hemisphere lowlands are the frozen leftovers of what was once a liquid sea, then are there chemical clues of past conditions-even past life-locked up and preserved there?

So, do we have answers to these questions yet? Is there ice under Phoenix within reach of its scooper? At the time of my writing this the answer is: maybe. During the first week of testing Phoenix’s systems to get it ready for full-on prospecting, a picture of the ground underneath the lander was taken using the camera attached to the robotic arm. This picture revealed a patch of solid substance that seems to have been exposed by the blast of Phoenix’s landing rockets. It looks like it could be ice, but until a sample is analyzed we won’t know for sure (because, it could be solid rock, too).

The first sample scoop of soil dug up by Phoenix’s shovel was placed in a bucket on board the lander and examined by camera, before being carefully dumped into a designated sample waste location (Mars’ first land fill). The picture revealed some white substance in the reddish soil-which could be ice, or possible salt.…

Stay tuned in the coming days and weeks for hot news from the ice as Phoenix conducts its investigations in earnest.




37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners, TV | Please Comment

Young Einsteins found in Oakland

May 25th, 2008 by Ben Burress

School groups tour the Oakland Schools Science Fair
projects at Chabot. Ben Burress, Chabot Space & Science CenterIt’s the time of year again that I get a chance to peruse what our scientific-minded youth are thinking on questions of the physical world and universe around us: Oakland Unified School District Science Faire!

The science projects of students from a range of schools in Oakland are on display at Chabot Space & Science Center for a couple of days-a long-time tradition I know, because when I was in elementary school (Glenview Elementary in Oakland) I participated in the Science Faire every year and wound up with my First Grade project (Which Straw Works Best-longer or shorter?) on display at Chabot Observatory on Mountain Blvd.

So I went out into our halls to browse the rows of free-standing cardboard displays (all pre-fabbed display boards; in my day we’d make our own from boxes, staples, and glue!) to see what today’s young minds are thinking about science. In particular, I was looking for any that dealt with astronomy.

As usual, I saw a range of science topics, presentations styles, decoration, and grade levels. I saw the cadre of “standard” science projects that get done every year (the tabletop volcano, the floating egg, the electric potato, and the like).

I also saw some that I’d not seen before. There was one where the question asked was who has more germs, boys or girls? The experimenter took swab samples from behind the ears and from the hands of the students in her fourth grade class and grew germ cultures, which were all displayed before the presentation board in little plastic Petri dishes. What was the result? Do you want to know? Well, by this experiment at least, the girls won over the boys in having more germs from both sample sites….

But what of the astronomy? In all of the couple hundred project displays, only three of them were astronomy projects. This doesn’t surprise me too much, since astronomy is for the most part an observational, not experimental, science and doesn’t lend itself to the kinds of things kids like to get their hands into. And of my own elementary school science faire projects, not one of them dealt with astronomy, so I really can’t complain!

What were they? One dealt with observations of Moon phases, asking the question is there a pattern to the way in which the Moon’s shape changes from day to day. One asked why do the planets of the Solar System take different periods of time to orbit the Sun, and why do they have different temperatures. Finally, one asked the ultimate Inconvenient Truth sort of question: What would happen to Earth if the Sun suddenly turned off? (That would be inconvenient!) The answer to that one was, not long, since just about everything we do requires energy derived ultimately from the Sun.

The results of my own observation project, walking down the halls of Chabot and seeing what’s up in the minds of our youth, was a happy success: the curiosity and scientific enthusiasm of our budding scientists appears to be alive and well.




37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, Education, Partners, Physics | Please Comment

Probing the Martian Pole

May 9th, 2008 by Ben Burress

Mockup of Phoenix (top) and ‘Robinson Crusoe on Mars’
(bottom)—both set in Death Valley National Park…
Credit: NASA (top), Paramount Pictures (bottom)It’s that time of the Martian year again: when a flying saucer from Earth appears in the skies of Mars. Imagine if there actually were Martians up there: what’s science fiction here on Earth would pass for reality on the Red Planet—and a routine occurrence at that!

This time the flavor of the day is the Phoenix Lander, courtesy of NASA, scheduled to land on May 25th at about 4:38 PM PDT. We’ll be watching live NASA coverage of the landing at Chabot Space & Science Center that afternoon, if you’d care to join us…

Following somewhat in the footsteps of the Viking landers of the 1970s, Phoenix’s primary mission is to look for evidence of life, or at least the chemical conditions that might be suitable for life to exist. The two Viking landers carried small chemical laboratories that analyzed soil samples scooped up from the surface, as does Phoenix.

While its mission parallels that of Viking, one big difference from Phoenix is its destination: the Northern Polar Ice Cap of Mars. The Vikings landed much farther south in the mid latitudes. Phoenix is targeting the ices of Mars’ arctic region.

Growing up, one of my favorite sci-fi films was Robinson Crusoe on Mars. Made in 1964, the same year that Mariner 4, the first space probe to Mars, was launched, RCOM made a descent stab at imagining what it was like. So what if the main character walked around in apparent t-shirt weather and with sufficient atmospheric pressure to keep his blood from boilin–he still wore a respirator that doled out oxygen from an ever-dwindling supply tank, a nod to Mars’ thin atmosphere.

A couple of other things our astronaut Robinson Crusoe found on that fictional Mars that we are now looking for on the real one: liquid water and life…Our hero found small caches of water (with the help of a monkey) in grottos between the rocks, and, lo and behold, living in that water was a vine-like life form with edible fruit or tubers. He even took a foot-trek, along with his guy Friday, to the polar ice cap…

(I also loved the film because some of its “Martian terrain” scenes were shot in my favorite spot on Earth, Death Valley…)

Though evidence of past liquid water action seems to be all about the planet, Phoenix certainly won’t find any brooks or pools or grottos of spring water, owing at least in part to the frigid arctic region it will set feet on–an arctic zone on a world where the warmest temperatures in the tropics might reach levels of the coldest climates on Earth. What’s important about landing on Mars’ ice cap is that Phoenix is almost certain to dig up some water–albeit frozen.

And it is the chemical compounds either locked up in that ice or preserved by its proximity that Phoenix is interested in. (Similarly, climatologists on Earth study ice cores from Antarctica to analyze the trapped and preserved gases of Earth’s atmosphere of past millennia.)

We wish Phoenix a happy landing, and look forward to the first images and discoveries from the Martian North Pole. And I’m fairly confident the epic polar adventure ahead won’t resemble in the least another “great” film of 1964: Santa Claus Conquers the Martians….

Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.







37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, KQED, Partners | Please Comment

Cassini Martini: Add Water, Ammonia, Methane; Mix Well

April 25th, 2008 by Ben Burress

Artist concept of a geyser erupting on Enceladus.
Credit: David Seal.Back when I was young…okay, a previous generation might have ended that sentence with, “…I’d walk forty miles through the snow to get to school…” But I’m not exaggerating when I say, when I was young we knew next to nothing about faraway places in the Solar System…such as the moons of Saturn.

A layer of the veil around Saturn’s moons was removed when Pioneer 11 and Voyagers 1 and 2 made flybys of Saturn in the ’70s and ’80s. The Saturnian moons, it appeared, were not the lumps of rock and dust that Earth’s own Moon is made of, but objects containing no small amount of water ice. Not terribly surprising, considering the low temperatures of the outer solar system where ice-rich comets roam.

Visions of frozen alien landscapes, replete with icicles and ice cliffs and ice fields and ice ice ice! were conjured in my imagination, and in artist depictions of majestic ringed Saturn seen from moons like Rhea or Dione or Enceladus.

Four years ago, Saturn’s first permanent visitor from Earth–the Cassini spacecraft–arrived there, and since has been making extreme closeup examinations of Saturn, its rings, and its increasingly wondrous and beautiful moons. Cassini is almost literally ripping apart veil after veil of our ignorance of these little worlds.

Far from a contingent of enormous but simple snow cone balls, Cassini has shown us that some of Saturn’s moons are apparently alive with liquid motion. First, there were the surface “lakes” and “seas” on Titan, probably made of extremely cold liquid hydrocarbons like methane and ethane–the stuff that spouts out of the gas range in your kitchen. Lakes and seas and rolling waves of liquid natural gas are fine and dandy for an imagined shoreline scene–but take a dip in those “waters” and an actual water-based creature like you would freeze solid in seconds. Scenic, but not inviting for a swim…

But recent observations by Cassini have shown that Titan’s frigid unearthly lakes and Enceladus’ snowball exterior may just be additional veils that are now being lifted.

In March, Cassini flew within 30 miles of the surface of Enceladus and right through a plume of material venting into space from the moon’s interior—an enormous “geyser.” Earlier observations had sensed the presence of water in the plume, giving rise to speculation that liquid water in some form might exist beneath Enceladus’ surface—perhaps chambers of liquid heated by tidal stressing of the interior.

When Cassini flew through the plume, its chemical sensors “sniffed” more than just water in the stream, but a good deal of organic molecules as well…not unlike material found in comets, stuff left over from the formation of the Solar System that may have been the building blocks of life on Earth.

The other “water find” was that of a possible liquid ocean under the crust of Titan–similar perhaps to the deep liquid water ocean believed to exist under the surface of Jupiter’s moon Europa. Unexpected “drift” in the locations of landmarks on Titan’s surface is what suggests a liquid ocean–water with perhaps some ammonia–that the frozen crust may be floating on.

With all the liquid water and organic chemistry being revealed in the Saturn system (and elsewhere in the outer solar system), our imaginations can shift from the older standards of envisioning otherworldly landscapes of sculpted ice or even seascapes of liquid hydrocarbon lapping on shores of water ice sand, to something a little more, shall we say, “lively…”?

Benjamin Burress is a staff astronomer at The Chabot Space & Science Center in Oakland, CA.







37.7631, -122.409




Posted in Astronomy, Chemistry, KQED, Partners | Please Comment
Next Page »