<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Those Intermittent Renewables &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/05/13/those-intermittent-renewables-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/05/13/those-intermittent-renewables-part-2/</link>
	<description>Science, Environment, and Nature in the SF Bay Area</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 18:36:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jasmine</title>
		<link>http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/2009/05/13/those-intermittent-renewables-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-63283</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasmine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kqed.org/quest/blog/?p=2451#comment-63283</guid>
		<description>Grid Energy storage on the scale we&#039;d need with the technology we have today is prohibitively expensive but Ice for energy storage has similar benefits to the grid and is cost effective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Grid Energy storage on the scale we'd need with the technology we have today is prohibitively expensive but Ice for energy storage has similar benefits to the grid and is cost effective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
