Brining a turkey can help retain more moisture and flavor during the cooking process. Photo by Shawn Hatfield.

I grew up in a family of chefs. I think I was three when I cooked my first meal on our olive green gas stove. My brother proudly watched over my process as I burned scrambled eggs. Since then, my abilities have improved. Thanksgiving is one of my favorite holidays because I get to be in the kitchen for a good solid chunk of time. For those who love to cook, Thanksgiving is like the SuperBowl.

For the last couple of years, I have brined the bird. One of the things I hated growing up at Thanksgiving was overcooked turkey. It is dry, flavorless and feels like eating cardboard. I would often forgo turkey because of how dry it was. Meat, especially lean meat like turkey loses about a third of its moisture during cooking. One year, my uncle tried to alleviate this dryness by deep fat frying the turkey. However, he forgot to heat the oil before putting the bird in the cooker which is a fairly big no-no. Needless to say that year, I was very grateful that I was a practicing vegetarian.

Brining has been my preference for the past three years because it is far healthier than deep fat frying and it cuts the cooking time in half. Most importantly is creates a juicy delicious Thanksgiving turkey. Brining entails soaking the meat for a number of hours in a chilled solution of salt and water. I got my recipe off the food network site, specifically from Alton Brown on Good Eats and it includes salt, vegetable stock, brown sugar and various spices.

But how does brining work? The salt solution passes through the permeable meat cells during the soaking process using the method of osmosis. Osmosis is the diffusion of water through a semi-permeable membrane – in this case the meat cells. Through diffusion, the salt and water within the meat cells balance with the salt and water in the surrounding brine which results in a higher concentration of salt and water in the meat. Food chemists disagree about the mechanics of this diffusion and how salt travels across membranes, but at the end of the day, the diffusion results in more water and flavor within the cells of the meat.

The high concentration of salt also denatures protein strands. In their normal state, the strands are tightly wound; denatured strands unwind and tangle. During cooking, this unusual structure traps water molecules and holds onto them. The end result of this osmosis is less moisture is lost during cooking. This year, I couldn’t cook on Thanksgiving day so I invited friends over for pre-Thanksgiving. The turkey turned out just as good as last year. Even the leftover bird was moist after being reheated in a microwave. Which means that this is a recipe that will stay in the folder in my kitchen for years to come…

Happy Thanksgiving!

For more information about the science behind cooking, here are some great websites:

Cooking for Engineers
Exploratorium’s Science of Cooking
Good Eats on the Food Network

If a DNA testing company gets bought out, what happens to their customers' DNA? Image by Molly Eyres. / CC BY 2.0

One niggling worry I had when I decided to get some genetic testing from 23andMe was what would happen to my DNA if the company failed. By all accounts, 23andMe is a very healthy company* so it was more of a theoretical worry for me. Not so for deCODEme folks…

Like 23andMe, deCODEme looks at hundreds of thousands of different areas of a customer’s DNA in order to predict that customer’s future health and provide information about his or her ancestry and traits. This week deCODEme’s parent company, DeCode Genetics, filed for bankruptcy. Press reports indicate that parts of the company will go up for auction. I am not sure if that includes deCODEme but I am sure all of their customers are sweating it out right now.

The big question now isn’t whether these people will still get good service from deCODEme. Instead it is what the company that buys deCODEme will do with all those customers’ DNA. Will they maintain deCODEme’s previous privacy policies? Or, in the worst case scenario, will they connect DNA to name and sell the combination to the highest bidder?

I have to say that at first I was a little panicky when I started thinking about this. Especially when I started to contemplate what my health insurance company would do to me if they got a hold of my DNA.

Everyone has some genetic problems lurking in their DNA and I am sure that insurance companies would be happy to limit or even drop people’s coverage based on this. The new health care reform bills are supposed to prevent an insurance company from dropping someone based on a pre-existing condition but I am not sure if something like this counts. If it doesn’t, then I would probably end up with a policy that doesn’t cover conditions my DNA says that I am more likely to get. (Very useful insurance!)

If the new bill does consider potential risks from our DNA a pre-existing condition, then this isn’t really that big a worry. Except that I bet the new bills allow the insurance companies to jack up someone’s premiums based on their pre-existing conditions. In which case they’ll charge me so much I’ll have to drop my coverage anyway.

The other possible uses for my DNA that I could think of paled in comparison to this one. For example, I don’t think I’d mind if they sold my DNA to a pharmaceutical company so that the company could make a useful drug. Or to academics so that my DNA could be used to learn something about the human genome. It seems like those are sort of noble purposes for my DNA, kind of like donating it to science.

I couldn’t really think of much else that other companies might do with my DNA. Of course if the health insurance scenario were to happen, that would be plenty bad enough.

* Especially since one of the cofounders, Anne Wojcicki, is married to Sergey Brin, Google cofounder.

Quantum mechanics and Foosball? Credit: RickyDavid.

When I began this story, it seemed pretty simple. I'd heard that scientists at Lawrence Berkeley National Lab were working to mimic photosynthesis and create a man-made version of the process that could supply us with renewable energy.

The premise is to create a "closed-loop" energy system. Artificial leaves would use water, sunlight and carbon dioxide as inputs to create fuels like butane. Those fuels would be used for transportation or fuel cells. And by burning those fuels, we would produce carbon dioxide. The cycle goes on from there.

I never thought that quantum mechanics would enter the picture. That's what I discovered at the UC Berkeley lab of Graham Fleming. He says we have a lot to thank photosynthesis for. It produces the oxygen we breathe and is the basis for the entire food chain on the planet.

Fleming's lab is dedicated to understanding how photosynthesis works so well. And one of the things they've found is that plants are somehow tapping into quantum mechanics to improve their efficiency. It's pretty complicated – but with the help of the folks in Fleming's lab, they helped me understand it through, of all things, Foosball. Here's an audio version of it to help you out.

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Listen to the Building an Artificial Leaf radio report online, and listen to our Web Extra: Photosynthesis and Foosball.

The view from the control room of Chabot's planetarium during
the live LCROSS lunar impact eventIt's official: NASA's LCROSS mission found water on the Moon, no bones about it. Though NASA is still analyzing all the data they reaped from the LCROSS impact event on October 9th, and will be for a long time to come, they seem confident enough about the preliminary findings to make this a definite declaration of discovery!

Rewind to October 9th. It was a lot of fun watching the event up here at Chabot. We'd hoped to observe the impact through our 36-inch telescope, Nellie, but were clouded out. Fortunately, the main part of the show was brought to us via satellite from NASA—and from the vantage point of the LCROSS spacecraft, on its collision course with the Moon, where terrestrial weather was not a factor.

Our planetarium was filled—overfilled actually; we had to open up our theater across the hall as an overflow viewing area! Mind you, it was 3:00 in the morning on a Friday, and still over 300 people showed up in various states of caffeination.

I set up the planetarium to resemble the control room of a futuristic starship: a huge spinning animation of the Moon overhead, and several large projections showing simulations of the impending impact, recent images from other lunar missions, and, front and center, the view from NASA, which alternated between Mission Control at Ames Research Center and a live view from the LCROSS spacecraft itself.

The view from LCROSS showed an ever-nearing wall of lunar craters and topography as LCROSS homed in on its fate. The announcement was made that the primary impactor, LCROSS's Centaur upper rocket stage, had impacted, and we all strained our eyes looking for the plume of dust the impact was hoped to produce. But, the impact didn't create as visible an ejecta plume as expected; we stared on, but only saw the wall of craters loom closer and closer.

The four minutes between Centaur impact and the inevitable impact by LCROSS itself ticked by, and we held our breaths. Then, the image went blank, and NASA announced that LCROSS had impacted the Moon. Though we didn't see the plume, it was exciting to ride along with LCROSS to its end, and live to tell about it. Next better thing to being there….

Back to the water. Though no plume of dust was seen by LCROSS's main visible camera, that's not all it had in its toolbox of instruments. Most revealing was data collected by LCROSS's spectrometer—the device that sorts out the wavelengths of light and discriminates the specific wavelengths emitted by specific chemicals. Water (H2O) and hydroxyl (OH) seem to have been present in the dust plumes kicked up from the permanently shadowed floor of Cabeus crater, at the lunar south pole.

And more: other volatile chemicals—whose identities will no doubt be revealed by NASA in coming months in the due course of their data analysis—appear to have been detected in the impact plume.

How much water? Are we talking vast sheets of solid ice, glaciers, and land-locked icebergs? Well…though NASA hasn't yet characterized the quantities of water inferred by LCROSS's detection, the serene waters of Cabeus likely are a mixture of lunar soil and ice—a substance you'd have to work at to extract pure water from.

For more exciting discoveries to come, stay tuned to the Moon….

Geek Out by taking the Mars Survival Challenge

Forget the challenging landscapes of the Arctic or Everest; if you want a true survival test, how about Mars? Our red neighbor has inspired thousands of intrepid explorers (and a number of awful movies) to formulate colonization plans. With a little help from Google Mars, you can choose plot near all the important landmarks: Valles Marineris, Olympus Mons, or even the famous northern polar ice caps.

Thanks to our friends at the Lawrence Hall of Science, you too can help the colonization effort. At their Geek Out event on 11/18, you’ll be able to design your own Mars Base. There will be experts on hand from the SETI Institute and NASA to provide some info on the Martian landscape and what it takes to survive there.

You’ll be able to videotape your landscape to share with the rest of the universe. Who knows, the first ever Martian colony could be named after you!

This is the 2^nd LHS Geek Out event, a new monthly science series for adults. The evening will be full of interactive science, music, and cocktails. There is also a free shuttle from the Downtown Berkeley BART to the museum. For a primer, check out this video from the 1^st Geek Out event.

LHS Geek Out: Mars Survival Challenge
When: Wednesday 11/18, 7-10 PM
Where: Lawrence Hall of Science, Berkeley
Cost: $10, $8 for members and UC Berkeley Students
Details: Come to Lawrence Hall of Science, grab a drink and a friend, and get ready for some downright nerdy fun. All events include full access to exhibits, a cash bar, hors d’oeuvres, and of course the best view in the East Bay. Program is for adults only.

Electron microscope image of a hole embedded within a sheet of graphene. The corners of the green hexagons are carbon atoms which form graphene’s crystal structure. Image courtesy of the Zettl Research Group, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and University of California at Berkeley.

Acquiring a sample of graphene is almost comically easy. Start with an ordinary piece of graphite, which is basically the same material that is used in pencil lead. Squeeze it between two pieces of Scotch tape and tear them apart. Repeat several times until pieces of the graphite have been cleaved into sheets no more than a single atom thick. Voila – graphene! Total cost of 1 pencil plus a roll of Scotch tape: about $3.

Simple as this process is, scientists did not even know that single sheets of graphene could exist until 2004. Now that we know that we can make graphene, it turns out that it has some amazing electrical properties and someday might even replace silicon as the most important component in computer circuitry. To that end, researchers in Alex Zettl’s group at Berkeley have endeavored recently to isolate suspended membranes of graphene for study and image them at Lawrence Berkeley Lab’s TEAM 0.5, the world’s most powerful transmission electron microscope (TEM). Results were published last spring by Çaglar Ö. Girit and others in the Science.

Two aspects of the Zettl group’s recent work have been particularly interesting. First, the TEAM 0.5 microscope not only has the ability to see individual atoms of graphene, but can also take pictures in close to real time. This means that Girit was able to see dynamics of graphene as they actually happened. Other types of microscopy (scanning tunneling microscopes, for example) can take several minutes to get a single picture.

Second, Girit and others centered their images at a hole within the graphene sheet. This allowed them to observe the dynamics that occur at the material’s edge. Such edges can have a notable effect on a graphene sheet’s electrical properties and thus understanding them and controlling them would be crucial in the design of any future technology.

Aside from technological applications, graphene is a theoretical physicist’s dream system because it beautifully combines the dynamics of relativistic particles from space such as neutrinos with the experimental accessibility of an easy system to make and manipulate here on Earth. Girit thinks that this is perhaps the single most exciting aspect of the system.

Only time will tell if graphene will have a long-term impact on society, but this would not be the first time a new discovery has transformed the Bay Area. In 1955 William Shockley moved to Mountain View, CA to found a new startup developing the silicon transistor. His company’s success was ultimately marred by Shockley’s own belligerent personality (“He understood everything except people,” Charles Townes once remarked), but the invention and the industry that grew up around it have revolutionized the region. The Santa Clara Valley’s old nickname, “the Valley of Heart’s Delight,” has long since been whisked away into a memory of a distant time and setting. Today most of us know it only as Silicon Valley. Our children may know the region as something entirely different.

As the high-speed rail inches toward reality, it's encountering a thicket of NIMBYism.

We'd been wanting to do an update on the California high speed rail project for months now. (Here's David Gorn's HSR Quest Radio piece from 9/08.) Luckily, there's no bad time to cover high speed rail. The project is so huge, so expensive, so ambitious and so controversial that you could make a whole beat out of it and stay entertained for a good long time.

But if – like me – you're just taking a dip, the first place to check out is the High Speed Rail Authority site. The Authority clearly has deep pockets when it comes to producing animations of the 432-mile train line. Would that the planning process ran as smoothly as those blue and yellow trains.

Click below to use the interactive map.

Your next stop should be this great primer on the technology and issues surrounding HSR, produced by my TV colleagues at QUEST.

I also recommend Robert Cruickshank's California High Speed Rail Blog. Cruickshank makes no secret of his pro-HSR stance — nor of his irritation at those who've put up roadblocks or expressed concerns — but his site is readable and impressively comprehensive. I guess you can count on the train buffs to track every twist and turn of the most ambitious rail project since the Transcontinental Railroad.

The former Vice President Al Gore was a speaker at this year's Greenbuild International Conference and Expo.

It took me about six hours to travel from my bed in Walnut Creek to the Phoenix Convention Center, the location of this year’s Greenbuild International Conference and Expo, sponsored by the U.S. Green Building Council, and then about an hour more to make my way to the Home Energy booth in the Exposition Hall. Big event, big venue. There are more than 1,000 companies and organizations here, representing every facet of green building, from mulch to windows to lighting to HVAC to water to insulation to… I don’t know the final count, but I heard there are more than 20,000 participants.

Thank goodness I had booked a few appointments. Otherwise I wouldn’t have known where to start. I met Graham Martin, Chairman and CEO of EnOcean Alliance. The Alliance brings together companies from around the world who work in wireless devices. The group got together to ensure that Company A devices could talk to Company B devices. For example, Verve Living System is a lighting control system that allows a person to wirelessly turn on and off all the lights and outlets in a house. Goodbye wasted standby power! It is being used in new construction and is especially appropriate for multifamily buildings, but it can be installed in retrofit buildings.

With Illumra controls, you can turn on and off whatever office lights you want from your iPhone, from wherever you are. And Graham was enthusiastic to show me EnOcean switching devices that need no batteries. The mechanical energy of one finger flipping a toggle switch is enough to power a wireless signal telling your air conditioner to shut down. According to Graham, EnOcean technology will take the smart grid into the home. “ZigBee is great technology to connect homes to utilities because it can use power from the network. But once inside, EnOcean technology uses so little energy that you never even have to change a battery.” Wow, it’s like the Smart Grid is learning to talk. Its first words are “Fight global warming.”

In the evening we were inspired by Vice President Al Gore at Chase Field, where the Arizona Diamondbacks play baseball. I got to watch from the press box, and we didn’t even have to be quiet. The food was pretty good and the beer was very good and I met some interesting people who write about glass, construction processes, and international trade relations. The “former next President of the United States” warmed up the crowd with some, frankly, corny jokes. There was one about a farmer and a pickup and cow, but I won’t waste anymore of my word count on that. He said, “We have enough ideas and technology to solve three or four global climate crises, but we only have one.” I like his optimism. The former next President called for a new Marshall Plan for energy security. “With the first Marshall Plan, we made sure that there would not be another world war in Europe. There are a lot of reasons why we have gone to war there, and there is a lot of interest in the area of the world that happens to sit on two-thirds of the world’s oil supply. We need to move away from fossil fuels so that we are no longer dependent on other countries for our economic security.”

But it was Gore’s last point that gave me a big boost. “I was thirteen years old when President Kennedy challenged the nation to put a man on the moon. Most people thought that we didn’t have the technology or the knowhow to do it. “When Apollo 11 landed on the moon, the average age of the scientists and engineers manning their stations in Mission Control was 26. That means that they were 18 when President Kennedy made his speech.” I work with people every day who were part of the energy efficiency revolution of the 70s and 80s and who are still going strong. Gore asked for a show of hands of anyone 18 years old or younger. From the press box I saw a lot of hands.

Could the cosmetics in your purse be harmful to your health? Image from Wikimedia Commons. / CC BY-NC 3.0

Each October, within Breast Cancer Awareness Month, my friends and I get into a flurry organizing and putting on Beats for Boobs. Beats for Boobs is an annual fundraiser started by my friend Juliana Cochnar after finding out her mother was diagnosed with Breast Cancer. The Beats for Boobs mission is to educate the community on breast cancer through a collaborative celebration of art, fashion, food and music.

This year the fundraiser welcomed 1200 people through its doors and raised over $20,000 for local Breast Cancer organizations. The theme this year was Green is the new Pink. The education team, which I have been a member of for three years, now, was tasked with educating the public on ways to prevent breast cancer. We set up a prize wheel and gave everyone a chance to win; all they had to do was answer a question about Breast Cancer correctly.

Some of the questions posed were:

Question: Synthetic Chemicals can accumulate in body fat and remain in breast tissue for decades- some that can cause mammary tumors.

TRUE/FALSE

Answer: TRUE

Question: 80,000 chemicals have been registered for use in the United States in the last 40 years, yet _________ of them have been fully tested for their effects on our health.

10%
25%
50%
5%

Answer: 10%

Question: No more than _______ women who have Breast Cancer have a genetic history of the disease.

1:5
1:3
1:8
1:10

Answer: 1:10

Question: Which of the everyday products below can contain chemicals linked to breast cancer?

Shampoo
Deodorant
Face Cream and Make-Up
Sunscreen
All of the above

Answer: All of the above

Most of the night, I was stationed at the What’s in Your Purse Table, which used the Skin Deep: Cosmetic Safety Database Website to access the hazard of everyday products. “Now in its fourth year and third major update… Skin Deep database provides you with easy-to-navigate safety ratings for nearly a quarter of all products on the market — 52,099 products with 8,799 ingredients. At about one million page views per month, Skin Deep is the world's largest and most popular product safety guide. The database rates items on a 1 to 10 scale – 0-2 is low hazard, 3-6 is a moderate hazard, 7-10 is a high hazard. After the fundraiser, I became very well acquainted with the Skin Deep website. I went through every cosmetic item in my house and as a girl with a love of make-up that meant quite a few items! Most of the items I was using on my face were a moderate to high hazard rating. The toothpaste I used had a rating of 7. The eyeliner I used on a daily basis had a rating of 9 and the lip-gloss I wore nearly everyday had a rating of 6. At the end of my research, I had found out that my mineral make-up was low hazard but my eye shadows, sunscreen, soap and toothpaste had to go. I got rid of a full shopping bag of products that all rated 5 and above. I called my mom and told her what I found out. I am bringing over my laptop and we are going through her bathroom and toiletries next week.

Each year, on the education committee for Beats for Boobs we try to make the education fun and accessible so we can instill ways to prevent Breast Cancer. The Skin Deep website was an excellent resource to do just that. Only one person was able to get something out of it this year but I am hoping that with this blog and a new approach next year, that number will continue to rise.

This blog is in honor to my Aunt who is surviving Breast Cancer.

What would it take you to change your shower to a low-flow shower head?

Do you love a long, hot and powerful shower? What would it take you to change your shower to a low-flow shower head? Be honest.

• A. I understood the environmental impact that it would have
• B. I have knowledge of and compassion for the watershed
• C. Someone came to my house and put in a free low-flow shower head for me
• D. I would be publicly recognized
• E. I verbally committed to doing it
• F. Everyone else on my block is doing it
• G. President Obama and Jane Goodall are doing it (not together!)
• H. All of the above.

Canadian environmental psychologist Doug McKenzie-Mohr believes that the last five reasons inspire more behavior change than the first two. I recently took a workshop with McKenzie, who coined the phrase “Community Based Social Marketing”, and was amazed to learn that studies indicate that “information intensive” campaigns are not very effective. Uh-oh – time to recycle the brochures. This is the method that we have been using to influence behavior change for years.

An earlier blog of mine explored what makes a person care about nature. Now I’m compelled to explore what makes a person change a behavior for the good of nature – the outcome I ultimately desire. Perhaps Community Based Social Marketing (CBSM) is the answer.

CBSM believes that people do not change behavior or do an activity because:

• They do not know about it
• They have many perceived barriers to the activity
• They believe it is easier to continue to do their current behavior than to change

Once the targeted audience knows about the issue, and the barriers are identified with research, it is time to convince them that the benefits outweigh those barriers.

There are many tools for inspiring the change of behavior: making a commitment, copying a well-respected community leader, being reminded with prompts, realizing that the behavior is the current social norm, clear and vivid messages, incentives, ease or a combination of these concepts. CBSM also believes that requests to change behavior are the most effective when they are at the community level and involve direct contact with humans. At the end of the program, outcomes are measured, not outputs. This makes sense!

So, with this in mind, what if President Obama and Dr. Jane Goodall arrived at your door with a lovely, low-flow shower head and installed it while they told you all about the watershed and how you are helping. They then planned to install an identical shower-head in all your friend’s bathrooms followed by thanking you all in the local newspaper. Would you change your showering behavior then? I think I would – a victim to the new concept of Community Based Social Marketing.

I can’t wait to try to get influence our zoo public to compost, our staff to recycle, and my supervisor to send me to more of Doug McKenzie’s workshops. And I will await that knock on my door.