|
July 1, 2002
Dear Mr. Ramirez,
I appreciate this opportunity to address the concerns
raised by one of my constituents during KQED Public Radios
The California Report. I am always pleased to hear my constituents
voicing their views and participating in a dialogue about public
policy.
Your caller asked if I would support making budget
cuts to other state programs before supporting cuts to public health.
As most KQED listeners probably know, California
faces a $23.6 billion deficit -- so cuts to the state budget seem
inevitable. However, I believe that these cuts must be balanced
with some additional revenue sources. I am urging my colleagues
to support reinstating the tax brackets for the wealthiest two percent
-- those households making more than $260,000 for the first bracket
and more than $520,000 for the second bracket.
In addition, I have proposed a plan that would cut
over $1.5 billion from prison funding. California should not be
funding the construction of a new prison in Delano or housing thousands
of foreign-born inmates. An overhaul of Californias prison
system would free up funding for essential programs like health
care and human services.
This May, I served as the acting chair of the Assembly
Budget Subcommittee on Health and Human Services while the Subcommittee
reviewed the Governor's proposed "May Revise" of the Budget.
Although the Subcommittee faced more than $1 billion in proposed
cuts to health and human services programs, we were able to restore
more than $800 million in funding to these programs. These restorations
required making cuts in other programs, overseen by separate Budget
Subcommittees.
My Subcommittee was able to restore more than $260
million for Medi-Cal "optional services" such as dental
coverage and medical supplies (including diabetes test strips and
catheters). We restored more than $50 million to fund hospital trauma
centers and hospitals that disproportionately serve individuals
on Medi-Cal. The Subcommittee restored $155 million to retain a
simplified reporting system for Medi-Cal clients, which means more
clients may stay on aid for longer periods of time. We maintained
a Medi-Cal program for clients transitioning off of public welfare
programs to increase their ability to remain employed. And lastly,
the Subcommitee restored funding to expand the Healthy Families
programs to cover low-income adults, who currently have no health
coverage.
While the majority of funding restorations made
by the Subcommittee were in health programs, we were not able to
restore all of the funding that the Governor proposed cutting. Some
of the cuts we approved included reductions in provider reimbursement
rates and reductions in the rates paid to pharmaceutical companies
for drugs that Medi-Cal patients receive. While these are not budget
cuts that I support, my goal was to do everything possible to protect
children and low-income families from proposed program cuts.
Our success in restoring funding in the Budget Subcommittee
is not the final action, however. The Budget Conference Committee
has been meeting this month to hammer out a final budget plan. To
date, the funding restorations we made have largely been maintained,
but there is still a budget gap that exceeds $4 billion. So funding
for health and human services programs continues to be at risk unless
we are able to agree upon tax increases that provide the revenue
needed to fill that gap.
Thank you again for contacting me. Please feel free
to contact me if you have additional questions.
Sincerely,
Dion Louise Aroner
14th Assembly District
|