KQED: BAY WINDOW

You Decide in the Debate Over Involuntary Treatment

Involuntary treatment, from forced administration of medication to hospitalization, is typically ordered as an option of last resort. But its use is increasing, with several states, including California, passing new laws in recent years that broaden the criteria for court-ordered care. This fall, Governor Gray Davis signed the Assisted Outpatient Treatment Demonstration Project Act of 2002, known as Laura's Law, which expands the authority of California county courts to order outpatient treatment. It represents the most significant reform of California's involuntary treatment statute in more than 30 years.

There is strong disagreement among patients and family members, mental health professionals and judges, police officers and others, over the ethical, moral and legal basis for involuntary treatment. At the center of this debate are concerns over civil rights and self-determination, but also the desperation of family members and communities to help those who have severe mental illness avoid suicide, homelessness or jail.

In this activity, you'll answer the same question multiple times, and each time you'll be asked to consider an opposing viewpoint. Keep in mind that the activity is an interactive devil's advocate and is designed to challenge your point of view.
YOU DECIDE: SHOULD A PERSON WHO HAS A MENTAL ILLNESS RECEIVE TREATMENT WITHOUT HIS OR HER CONSENT?